Search

Background: The diagnosis of graft rejection relies on the identification of donor-specific antibodies along with histological findings. Borderline changes are particularly challenging, representing non-rejection findings in up to 70% of cases. The analysis aimed to compare the results of histopathological conclusions with the findings from examination using a molecular microscope, which assesses gene expression (whole-genome microarray chip technology). Methods: Molecular microscope examination (MMDx) was applied to twelve patients (six men and six women) who underwent either indication or protocol graft biopsy. Results: The average age of patients was 46.6 years ± 4.2 (average follow-up from kidney transplantation was 6.1 months ± 1.2). MMDx examination was performed during indication biopsy in 11 patients and protocol biopsy in 1 patient. A total of 33% of the findings matched and 50% did not. Finally, we present a case of a patient with acute cellular rejection findings without clinical and laboratory correlation, where the use of MMDx significantly altered the treatment strategy. Conclusions: MMDx examination is suitable for complementing patients with ambiguous histological findings and a clinical picture not corresponding to biopsy results. The limitations of MMDx include cost and its inability to evaluate the potential recurrence of the underlying kidney disease in the graft. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic emerged in December 2019. Renal transplant recipients receiving chronic immunosuppression are considered to be at a high risk of infection. Aside from upper respiratory tract symptoms, coronavirus disease 2019 has also been reported to cause acute kidney injury in 20–50% of infected cases. Case presentation A 62‐year‐old male renal transplant recipient presented with high fever, diarrhea, and cough, concurrent with rapid deterioration of graft function. The patient tested positive for coronavirus disease 2019. The pathological findings of the graft biopsy revealed diffuse flattening of tubular epithelial cells and extensive loss of the brush border in proximal tubular cells. Mycophenolate mofetil was discontinued and sotrovimab, remdesivir, intravenous immunoglobulin, and intravenous methylprednisolone were administered, resulting in gradual improvements in clinical symptoms and renal function. Conclusion We describe a case of a coronavirus disease 2019‐infected kidney transplant recipient who developed severe acute kidney injury caused by severe acute tubular necrosis.

C3 glomerulonephritis (C3GN) is a rare cause of end-stage kidney disease and frequently recurrent in allografts following kidney transplantation (KT). Herein, we describe the case of a kidney transplant recipient who developed recurrent C3GN along with BK-virus-associated nephropathy (BKVAN) following KT. A 33-year-old man diagnosed with membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis 17 years ago underwent preemptive KT with a donor kidney from his aunt. Proteinuria gradually increased after 3 months following KT, and graft biopsy was performed 30 months after KT. Histopathological examination revealed recurrent C3GN. The dosages of triple immunosuppressive maintenance therapy agents were increased. Subsequently, serum C3 levels recovered to normal levels. However, at 33 months following KT, the BK viral load increased and graft function gradually deteriorated; a second graft biopsy was performed at 46 months following KT, which revealed BKVAN and decreased C3GN activity. The dosages of immunosuppressive agents were decreased; subsequently, BKVAN improved and graft function was maintained with normal serum C3 levels at 49 months following KT. This case indicates that C3GN is highly prone to recurrence following KT and that immunosuppressive therapy for C3GN increases the risk of BKVAN. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The diagnosis of graft rejection relies on the identification of donor-specific antibodies along with histological findings. Borderline changes are particularly challenging, representing non-rejection findings in up to 70% of cases. The analysis aimed to compare the results of histopathological conclusions with the findings from examination using a molecular microscope, which assesses gene expression (whole-genome microarray chip technology). Methods: Molecular microscope examination (MMDx) was applied to twelve patients (six men and six women) who underwent either indication or protocol graft biopsy. Results: The average age of patients was 46.6 years ± 4.2 (average follow-up from kidney transplantation was 6.1 months ± 1.2). MMDx examination was performed during indication biopsy in 11 patients and protocol biopsy in 1 patient. A total of 33% of the findings matched and 50% did not. Finally, we present a case of a patient with acute cellular rejection findings without clinical and laboratory correlation, where the use of MMDx significantly altered the treatment strategy. Conclusions: MMDx examination is suitable for complementing patients with ambiguous histological findings and a clinical picture not corresponding to biopsy results. The limitations of MMDx include cost and its inability to evaluate the potential recurrence of the underlying kidney disease in the graft.

C3 glomerulonephritis (C3GN) is a rare cause of end-stage kidney disease and frequently recurrent in allografts following kidney transplantation (KT). Herein, we describe the case of a kidney transplant recipient who developed recurrent C3GN along with BK-virus-associated nephropathy (BKVAN) following KT. A 33-year-old man diagnosed with membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis 17 years ago underwent preemptive KT with a donor kidney from his aunt. Proteinuria gradually increased after 3 months following KT, and graft biopsy was performed 30 months after KT. Histopathological examination revealed recurrent C3GN. The dosages of triple immunosuppressive maintenance therapy agents were increased. Subsequently, serum C3 levels recovered to normal levels. However, at 33 months following KT, the BK viral load increased and graft function gradually deteriorated; a second graft biopsy was performed at 46 months following KT, which revealed BKVAN and decreased C3GN activity. The dosages of immunosuppressive agents were decreased; subsequently, BKVAN improved and graft function was maintained with normal serum C3 levels at 49 months following KT. This case indicates that C3GN is highly prone to recurrence following KT and that immunosuppressive therapy for C3GN increases the risk of BKVAN.

Abstract Background Lipofuscin deposition is a characteristic manifestation of aging. There is very limited literature in humans and in animals describing these deposits in native kidneys. Overall, it is thought to be non-pathogenic and successful transplants from a donor with lipofuscin deposits have been reported. We present the case of a patient who underwent a kidney transplant and a for-cause biopsy post-transplantation incidentally revealed lipofuscin deposition. Case presentation A 48-year old gentleman with a past medical history of diabetes, hypertension, coronary artery disease, and ischemic and then hemorrhagic cardiovascular accident underwent a successful kidney transplant. His donor was an expanded criteria donor with no major past medical history. Post-transplant course was complicated by delayed graft function requiring one dialysis treatment for hyperkalemia. After that he had an uneventful course and achieved a baseline creatinine of 1.2 mg/dL, with no proteinuria. On a routine 19-month follow-up he was noted to have proteinuria and an antibody against the major-histocompatibility-complex class I-related chain A. A graft biopsy revealed acute antibody-mediated rejection and impressive lipofuscin deposition. He was subsequently treated with an antibody-mediated rejection protocol that included high dose steroids, Rituximab, plasmapheresis, and intravenous immunoglobulin, but responded poorly to this regimen. A 6-month follow up biopsy continued to show lipofuscin deposition, with similar microvascular injury scores and 12-months later his creatinine remained stable but his proteinuria worsened. Patient was struggling with recurrent infectious episodes requiring hospitalizations and thus no further diagnostic or therapeutic treatments were pursued. Conclusions Lipofuscin deposition has been reported in solid organ transplants but the significance and cause are not well understood. Several physiologic and some pathologic causes to these deposits have been reported including age, diabetes, medications and a genetic syndrome. We propose that immunologic causes such as rejection in the presence of other risk factors could potentiate the oxidative stress leading to excessive lipofuscin deposition in kidney transplants. In the case of our patient, we conclude that these deposits were likely recipient-derived, and postulate that the cumulative burden of inflammation from rejection, and underlying medical conditions led to increased lipofuscin deposition. We speculate them to be an innocent bystander.

The development of an arteriovenous fistula (AVF) after renal graft biopsy is a rare complication, it is associated in most cases with spontaneous resolution. However, interventional therapies are required in some cases, to prevent graft loss. Selective embolization has been described as an alternative treatment. In the present study, we describes our experience on AVF after biopsy in kidney transplant patients, which was managed with selective embolization. From 2005 to 2015, a total of 452 kidney transplant biopsies were performed, 12 had an AVF requiring embolization. In 92% of cases, this was successful. Beforehand, mean serum creatinine levels were 2.45 mg/dL, after the procedure, that increased to 3.05, however, 3 months later, mean creatinine levels dropped to 1.85 mg/dL. Graft survival after 2 follow-up years was 72%. Our experience demonstrates that selective embolization of the AVF after kidney transplant biopsy is a safe procedure, and that transplant function can be maintained in patients with this complication. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The clinical course after liver transplantation (LT) in progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis type 1 (PFIC1) is complicated by intractable diarrhoea, growth failure, graft steatosis and cirrhosis. Recent evidence from Japan suggests the role of genotype to predict outcome after LT. We report a case with pathogenic frameshift mutation who had failed partial external biliary diversion, underwent LT and his post-LT course has been complicated by intractable diarrhoea, growth failure, steatosis and fibrosis. This case highlights the fact that homozygous frameshift p.Gly197LeufsTer10 mutation in ATP8B1 is associated with poor outcome and genetic evaluation should be mandatory before subjecting the patient to LT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Digital pathology has progressed over the last two decades, with many clinical and nonclinical applications. Transplantation pathology is a highly specialized field in which the majority of practicing pathologists do not have sufficient expertise to handle critical needs. In this context, digital pathology has proven to be useful as it allows for timely access to expert second-opinion teleconsultation. The aim of this study was to review the experience of the application of digital pathology to the field of transplantation. Methods: Papers on this topic were retrieved using PubMed as a search engine. Inclusion criteria were the presence of transplantation setting and the use of any type of digital image with or without the use of image analysis tools; the search was restricted to English language papers published in the 25 years until December 31, 2018. Results: Literature regarding digital transplant pathology is mostly about the digital interpretation of posttransplant biopsies (75 vs. 19), with 15/75 (20%) articles focusing on agreement/reproducibility. Several papers concentrated on the correlation between biopsy features assessed by digital image analysis (DIA) and clinical outcome (45/75, 60%). Whole-slide imaging (WSI) only appeared in recent publications, starting from 2011 (13/75, 17.3%). Papers dealing with preimplantation biopsy are less numerous, the majority (13/19, 68.4%) of which focus on diagnostic agreement between digital microscopy and light microscopy (LM), with WSI technology being used in only a small quota of papers (4/19, 21.1%). Conclusions: Overall, published studies show good concordance between digital microscopy and LM modalities for diagnosis. DIA has the potential to increase diagnostic reproducibility and facilitate the identification and quantification of histological parameters. Thus, with advancing technology such as faster scanning times, better image resolution, and novel image algorithms, it is likely that WSI will eventually replace LM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Macrophage infiltration is associated with unfavorable kidney graft outcome in protocol biopsies, but few studies have evaluated its impact on clinical practice. We therefore prospectively evaluated 37 kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) who underwent kidney biopsy due to slight increases in serum creatinine, or mild proteinuria (>0.3 g/24 hr), in the first post‐transplant year. Banff score, CD68+ count (score 0‐3) by immunohistochemistry, and 1‐year DSA were assessed. DGF was reported in 10 (27%) patients, 6 (16%) had normal biopsy, 7 (19%) borderline lesions, 13 (35%) IFTA, and 11 (30%) other lesions. Fifteen KTRs had grade 3 CD68+ infiltration, and 47% developed de novo DSA. During a 6.2 ± 2.7 year follow‐up, four patients (11%) suffered from biopsy‐proven T‐cell rejection, 17 KTRs (46%) lost their graft (12 in the grade 3 CD68+ group). Graft survival was lower in KTRs with grade 3 CD68+ infiltration (P = 0.0074; log‐rank test). Grade 3 CD68+ infiltrate was an independent predictor of graft loss (HR 5.41, 95% CI 1.74‐16.8; P = 0.003), together with more severe graft dysfunction at biopsy (HR 6.41, 95% CI 2.57‐16; P < 0.001). We conclude that grade 3 CD68+ interstitial infiltration is associated with increased risk of subsequent graft loss independent of other factors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) is a common cause of delayed allograft failure throughout the world. Its prevalence and risk factors vary depending on a number of factors. There is little information on the prevalence and risk factors for early CAN in live related renal transplant patients. Objectives: We aimed to determine the prevalence and the risk factors of early CAN in our setup. Patients and Methods: The study was conducted at Sindh Institute of Urology & Transplantation (SIUT), Karachi, from 2002 to 2005 on patients who had live related kidney transplantation and underwent at least one allograft biopsy within 18 months of transplantation. The biopsies were performed and prepared in accordance with established indications and guidelines. The Banff 97 classification and its updates were used to diagnose and categorize the biopsy pathology. Patients were divided into two groups depending on the presence or absence of CAN on biopsies. Following parameters were compared among the groups: age, sex, human leukocyte antigen (HLA) match, immunosuppression used, acute rejection (AR) episodes, urinary tract infections (UTIs), viral infections, cyclosporine levels, early and late graft function monitored by serum creatinine. Results: A total of 164 patients fulfilled the study inclusion criteria. The mean age of recipients and donors was relatively young. The majority of the donors were siblings. The overall prevalence of CAN was 25.6% (42/164), between 3 and 18 months post transplantation. The median time to the appearance of CAN was 9 months post-transplant. The prevalence of CAN increased as post-transplant duration increased. In 39 (92.8%) subjects, CAN was detected on the second or subsequent graft biopsy. Only 3 (7.2%) patients showed CAN on the first graft biopsy. The majority of cases belonged to moderate degree or grade II CAN. The mean serum creatinine values were higher in the CAN group at the time of discharge and all times post-transplantation. Conclusions: In conclusion, the results show that serum creatinine at the time of discharge is a useful predictor of later development of chronic changes in the allograft. Further studies are needed to identify the risk factors for the early development of chronic changes in living related renal transplant program.

Background: Chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) is a common cause of delayed allograft failure throughout the world. Its prevalence and risk factors vary depending on a number of factors. There is little information on the prevalence and risk factors for early CAN in live related renal transplant patients. Objectives: We aimed to determine the prevalence and the risk factors of early CAN in our setup. Patients and Methods: The study was conducted at Sindh Institute of Urology & Transplantation (SIUT), Karachi, from 2002 to 2005 on patients who had live related kidney transplantation and underwent at least one allograft biopsy within 18 months of transplantation. The biopsies were performed and prepared in accordance with established indications and guidelines. The Banff 97 classification and its updates were used to diagnose and categorize the biopsy pathology. Patients were divided into two groups depending on the presence or absence of CAN on biopsies. Following parameters were compared among the groups: age, sex, human leukocyte antigen (HLA) match, immunosuppression used, acute rejection (AR) episodes, urinary tract infections (UTIs), viral infections, cyclosporine levels, early and late graft function monitored by serum creatinine. Results: A total of 164 patients fulfilled the study inclusion criteria. The mean age of recipients and donors was relatively young. The majority of the donors were siblings. The overall prevalence of CAN was 25.6% (42/164), between 3 and 18 months post transplantation. The median time to the appearance of CAN was 9 months post-transplant. The prevalence of CAN increased as post-transplant duration increased. In 39 (92.8%) subjects, CAN was detected on the second or subsequent graft biopsy. Only 3 (7.2%) patients showed CAN on the first graft biopsy. The majority of cases belonged to moderate degree or grade II CAN. The mean serum creatinine values were higher in the CAN group at the time of discharge and all times post-transplantation. Conclusions: In conclusion, the results show that serum creatinine at the time of discharge is a useful predictor of later development of chronic changes in the allograft. Further studies are needed to identify the risk factors for the early development of chronic changes in living related renal transplant program. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A large body of evidence has been accumulated from experimental models in the past decade to support the critical role of Foxp3-expressing regulatory T cells (Tregs) in the suppression of alloimmune responses. This has prompted transplant clinicians to investigate whether Foxp3 analysis might be used as an immunodiagnostic tool for better assessment of the significance of graft infiltrate and to predict its impact on graft outcome. However, conflicting results have emerged from these studies and may have generated more confusion than clarification. Foxp3 expression has been antagonistically correlated with either good or poor prognosis. We discuss here how methodological issues and specific clinical settings may have accounted for the discrepancies between the results of these studies. Depending on many factors, including the techniques used, the method of sampling normalization, the extent of intra-graft inflammation, the immunosuppressive regimen and the depletion or repletion of T lymphocyte compartment, the significance of Foxp3 expression may vary. We propose here the conditions to be fulfilled in order to use Foxp3 analysis as a relevant biomarker for graft outcome assessment. Far from challenging the key role of Tregs in dampening alloimmune responses, this review highlights the need for technical harmonization and standards. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We report a case of type 1 diabetes mellitus who was successfully treated with simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK) transplantation and both grafts survived for 16 yr. A 30-yr-old woman underwent SPK transplantation from a non-heart-beating donor in January 1992. She was treated with combined immunosuppressive therapy consisting of cyclosporine, azathioprine, methylprednisolone, and anti-lymphocyte globulin. Allograft kidney biopsy was performed 10 yr after transplantation to determine the cause of proteinuria, which revealed no recurrence of diabetic nephropathy, suggesting that long-term normalization of glycemic control achieved by successful pancreas transplantation can prevent recurrence of diabetic nephropathy in the kidney allograft. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The purpose of this symposium was to evaluate the reproducibility of a histological diagnosis in renal allograft nephropathy according to the Banff classification. Seven transplant nephrologists and pathologists independently diagnosed the same glass slide specimens from 10 cases (five cases of acute rejection and five cases of chronic allograft nephropathy). Their diagnoses were collated and analyzed for the reproducibility of histological diagnosis. Consequently, several issues that hinder diagnostic reproducibility were identified. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Katafuchi R, Morozumi K, Sugitani A, Horita S, Ito H. How quickly can a renal transplant pathological diagnosis be completed? The demands of clinicians and the objections of pathologists. Clin Transplant 2005: 19 (Suppl. 14): 86–96.© Blackwell Munksgaard, 2005 This analyzer symposium was held in order to clarify whether pathologists were satisfying the demands of clinicians in renal transplant care in Japan. Thirty-one questions were prepared as to“Background”,“Transplant results”,“Basic issues concerning renal transplant biopsy diagnoses”,“Renal transplant biopsy and diagnosis, and actual treatment”, and“Diagnostic support”. By analyzing the answers of all the questions, the current status of renal transplant treatment in Japan has been clarified as follows. Most institutions can produce a renal transplant optical microscope section 1 or 2 days after the biopsy. Over 90% of those on the clinical side would like to have the diagnosis on the same day as the biopsy or at the latest the day after. Therefore, in fact a 24 hour time lag was observed between the pathological diagnosis and the request from the clinical side. No clinicians required a pathologist to decide whether to perform a transplant or not. Nearly all clinicians provide treatment based on the renal transplant biopsy diagnosis. As renal transplant pathological diagnosis is difficult, all pahtologists need a diagnostic support system. The creation of this system was thought to be a pressing matter. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We describe a cadaveric kidney transplant recipient with graft dysfunction after Norovirus infection. The graft biopsy specimen revealed no acute rejection findings, including antibody-mediated rejection in light microscopy. However, immunofluorescent study showed the linear and bright deposition of C4d along peritubular and glomerular capillaries. Norovirus brings formation of infection by binding to the histo-blood group antigens in epithelial cells of small intestine, and uses secretory H-antigen or A-antigen as a receptor. The recipient and donor had blood type A; the virus possibly bound to the histo-blood A-antigen in endothelial cells of vasculature in his graft after viremia. We consider Norovirus infection a possible cause of linear deposition of C4d in peritubular capillaries as a result of activation of complement pathways in endothelial cells of graft vasculature. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Lipofuscin deposition is a characteristic manifestation of aging. There is very limited literature in humans and in animals describing these deposits in native kidneys. Overall, it is thought to be non-pathogenic and successful transplants from a donor with lipofuscin deposits have been reported. We present the case of a patient who underwent a kidney transplant and a for-cause biopsy post-transplantation incidentally revealed lipofuscin deposition.Case Presentation: A 48-year old gentleman with a past medical history of diabetes, hypertension, coronary artery disease, and ischemic and then hemorrhagic cardiovascular accident underwent a successful kidney transplant. His donor was an expanded criteria donor with no major past medical history. Post-transplant course was complicated by delayed graft function requiring one dialysis treatment for hyperkalemia. After that he had an uneventful course and achieved a baseline creatinine of 1.2 mg/dL, with no proteinuria. On a routine 19-month follow-up he was noted to have proteinuria and an antibody against the major-histocompatibility-complex class I-related chain A. A graft biopsy revealed acute antibody-mediated rejection and impressive lipofuscin deposition. He was subsequently treated with an antibody-mediated rejection protocol that included high dose steroids, Rituximab, plasmapheresis, and intravenous immunoglobulin, but responded poorly to this regimen. A 6-month follow up biopsy continued to show lipofuscin deposition, with similar microvascular injury scores and 12-months later his creatinine remained stable but his proteinuria worsened. Patient was struggling with recurrent infectious episodes requiring hospitalizations and thus no further diagnostic or therapeutic treatments were pursued.Conclusions: Lipofuscin deposition has been reported in solid organ transplants but the significance and cause are not well understood. Several physiologic and some pathologic causes to these deposits have been reported including age, diabetes, medications and a genetic syndrome. We propose that immunologic causes such as rejection in the presence of other risk factors could potentiate the oxidative stress leading to excessive lipofuscin deposition in kidney transplants. In the case of our patient, we conclude that these deposits were likely recipient-derived, and postulate that the cumulative burden of inflammation from rejection, and underlying medical conditions led to increased lipofuscin deposition. We speculate them to be an innocent bystander. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]