1. Constraining spontaneous black hole scalarization in scalar-tensor-Gauss-Bonnet theories with current gravitational-wave data
- Author
-
Eugen Radu, Leong Khim Wong, Carlos Herdeiro, Institut de Physique Théorique - UMR CNRS 3681 (IPHT), and Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
- Subjects
High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena (astro-ph.HE) ,black hole: rotation ,black hole: spin ,gravitation: model ,Astrophysics::High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena ,gravitational radiation ,FOS: Physical sciences ,General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology (gr-qc) ,Bayesian ,General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology ,Gauss-Bonnet term ,gravitation: scalar tensor ,general relativity ,[PHYS.GRQC]Physics [physics]/General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology [gr-qc] ,hair: scalar ,[PHYS.ASTR]Physics [physics]/Astrophysics [astro-ph] ,Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena - Abstract
We examine the constraining power of current gravitational-wave data on scalar-tensor-Gauss-Bonnet theories that allow for the spontaneous scalarization of black holes. In the fiducial model that we consider, a slowly rotating black hole must scalarize if its size is comparable to the new length scale $\lambda$ that the theory introduces, although rapidly rotating black holes of any mass are effectively indistinguishable from their counterparts in general relativity. With this in mind, we use the gravitational-wave event GW190814$\,\unicode{x2014}\,$whose primary black hole has a spin that is bounded to be small, and whose signal shows no evidence of a scalarized primary$\,\unicode{x2014}\,$to rule out a narrow region of the parameter space. In particular, we find that values of ${\lambda \in [56, 96]~M_\odot}$ are strongly disfavored with a Bayes factor of $0.1$ or less. We also include a second event, GW151226, in our analysis to illustrate what information can be extracted when the spins of both components are poorly measured., Comment: Version accepted for publication. 8 pages + references, 4 figures. Some minor clarifications added relative to v1
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF