Search

Background: Ongoing global crises are forcing an increasing number of people to seek refuge in other countries. Refugees have often experienced multiple potentially traumatic events before and during their flight and are burdened by psychosocial problems in exile. Epidemiological research suggests that many refugees suffer from depression and need psychological care. Yet, a systematic review of psychological interventions for refugees with depression is lacking. Method: After registering in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO), a systematic search for trials of psychological interventions for adult refugees with depression was conducted across three electronic databases (MEDLINE, Web of Science, & PsycINFO). Relevant data reported in original journal publications were extracted, synthesized and assessed qualitatively by two independent raters. The methodological quality of included trials was assessed. Results: Of 1316 publications, a total of 20 studies met eligibility criteria. Nine of these trials were carried out in an individual setting and ten in a group setting, with one of the trials being conducted digitally. Nine studies were designed as a randomized controlled trial (RCT), with only one of them using an active control group. In nine trials, the use of an interpreter was reported. Three of the trials applied multimodal treatments, and a total of sixteen studies applied manualized treatments. Seventeen interventions were adaptations of treatment programs developed in high income countries within a western context. Overall, nineteen out of twenty trials reported a significant improvement in depressive symptoms. Culturally adapted cognitive behavioural therapy (CA-CBT) was most frequently used (4 RCTs) and produced large effect sizes. Overall, all trials had limitations in study design. Conclusions: Our current review suggests that psychological interventions, and in particular CA-CBT interventions, can significantly improve depressive symptoms in refugees. However, the small number of trials and limitations in study design underscore the need for more research in this field. The protocol for this review was registered in PROSPERO; registration number: CRD42021251943. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Including routine client feedback can increase the effectiveness of mental health interventions for children, especially when implemented as intended. Rate of implementation, or dose, of such feedback interventions has been shown to moderate results in some studies. Variation in implementation and use of client feedback may also contribute to the mixed results observed within the feedback literature. This study evaluates dose-response associations of client feedback using a novel Measurement Feedback System (MFS) within an indicated group intervention. The primary aim was to determine whether the rate of MFS implementation predicts symptom reduction in anxiety and depression among school-aged children. The secondary aim was to assess whether the rate of MFS implementation influences children's satisfaction with the group intervention or their dropout rates. Data were collected via a randomized factorial study (clinicaltrials.gov NCT04263558) across 58 primary schools in Norway. Children aged 8 to 12 years (N = 701) participated in a group-based, transdiagnostic intervention targeting elevated symptoms of anxiety or depression. Half of the child groups also received the feedback intervention using the MittEcho MFS. Group leaders (N = 83), recruited locally, facilitated the interventions. The MFS dose was measured using the Implementation Index, which combines the use of MFS by both children and providers (group leaders) into a single dose variable. Results showed no significant additional effect of dose of MFS on change in depression or anxiety scores, on user satisfaction with the intervention or on intervention dropout. The discussion addresses potential reasons for these non-significant findings and implications for MFS implementation in preventive, group-based interventions in school settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Group Radical Openness (GRO) has been shown to be a feasible and acceptable intervention for individuals who struggle with costly overcontrol. This paper explores participants' reports of attributions of change following the engagement in GRO. Method: Fourteen participants took part in qualitative interviews. An adapted version of 'The Revised Client Change Interview Schedule: Version 5' was used to capture the experiences of change following the intervention (Elliott & Rodgers, 2008). Research participants were outpatients of a psychiatric hospital who attended GRO. The sample consisted of 14 participants (6 females: 8 males); mean age 44.4 years; and age range 18–58. All participants attended 26, 3‐h group sessions. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to identify the specific aspects of the group therapy to which clients attributed change. Results: The analysis identified three superordinate themes, each with two subthemes. These included Safety and Connection (Safety and Tribe; Open and Genuine Facilitation); Understanding Overcontrol (Awareness of Overcontrol; The GRO Approach); and Carrying GRO Forward (Increased Awareness and Capacity to Reflect; Internalising GRO). Conclusion: Group Radical Openness was shown to be an acceptable group therapy treatment for people with an overcontrolled coping style. This paper further clarifies the participants' experiences of GRO and what aspects led to change from their perspective. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of International Anatolian Journal of Social Sciences / Uluslararasi Anadolu Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi is the property of Uluslararasi Anadolu Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Background: The COVID‐19 pandemic exposed a substantial portion of society to multiple stressors, while access to mental health care was limited. To address this, we introduced a digital stepped‐care program rooted in cognitive–behavioral therapy (CBT) principles, aiming to alleviate mental health distress among the general public seeking help. Methods: The program comprises a 4‐week digital application using "Aury" the chatbot, followed by an optional 6‐week online group session for those still symptomatic. A 4‐week waiting period separated these steps. Participants entered based on self‐identified mental health concerns. Interventions addressed prevalent pandemic mental health issues: sleep disturbances, anxiety, depression, worry/rumination, interpersonal issues, and resource mobilization. Outcomes focused on depressive, anxiety, and somatic symptoms, assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ). Results: Of the 1261 initial participants, postchatbot results (N = 142) indicated small to medium effects (d = 0.412 to d = 0.523). Those finishing the entire program (N = 41) saw substantial symptom decline with medium to large effects (d = 0.757 to d = 0.818). No shifts were seen in the waiting phase. At follow‐up 6 months after baseline, both groups—those who only used the chatbot (N = 60; d = 0.284 to d = 0.416) and those who completed the entire program (N = 27; d = 0.854 to d = 0.926)—showed sustained symptom reduction. Comparing groups that received no intervention, used the chatbot only, and completed the entire program, we observed a dose–response effect. Conclusions: This resource‐efficient and adaptable digital approach effectively reduced pandemic‐induced mental health issues, indicating its potential in crisis periods with limited health resources. Randomized controlled trials are recommended for further validation. Trial Registration: Clinical Trial Registry identifier: DRKS00023220. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Sleep and mental health problems are very common in university students. The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of a multi-component sleep-mood intervention on improving sleep and mental health in university students with clinically significant insomnia symptoms, and to investigate possible mediators. Methods: Thirty-five participants were randomized to the Sleep Mood Intervention: Live Effectively (SMILE) intervention (n = 23), or wait-list group (n = 12). SMILE is a multi-component group therapy and includes elements of cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I), mindfulness, and lifestyle modifications, in four weekly two-hour sessions. The primary outcome was insomnia severity. Secondary outcomes were severity of depression and anxiety, and quality of life (QoL). Dysfunctional beliefs and attitudes about sleep and pre-sleep arousal were assessed as mediators. Results: Intention-to-treat analysis showed significant time x treatment interaction on insomnia symptoms p =.02, partial η²= 0.15, d = 0.84 [95% CI: 0.63 to 1.14], with significantly lower insomnia severity for SMILE compared to waitlist at post-test. No significant effects were found on depression d = 0.02 [95% CI: -0.35 to 0.37], anxiety d = 0.15 [95% CI: -0.16 to 0.53], and QoL d = 0.09 [95% CI: -0.25 to 0.42]. Dysfunctional beliefs mediated the effect on insomnia severity, but pre-sleep arousal did not. Conclusions: This integrated group intervention is associated with reductions in insomnia symptoms in university students. Since no significant effects were detected on mood and QoL, future studies with larger sample size may explore the effects of this intervention on these outcomes. Trial registration: Registry: Overzicht van Medisch-wetenschappelijk Onderzoek. Registration number: NL-OMON46359. Date of registration: September 18th, 2018. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To explore the effect of cognitive-behavioral group intervention on social anxiety of freshmen in higher vocational colleges and the mediating role of negative automatic thinking. Methods: Eighty freshmen with high social anxiety were recruited and randomly assigned to the cognitive-behavioral group intervention group (CBGT group) and the waiting control group. The CBGT group received cognitive behavioral group intervention for 8 weeks and waited for the control group to do no intervention during this period. The Interaction Anxiety Inventory (IAS), Negative Evaluation Fear Scale (FNE), Social Avoidance and Distress Scale (SAD), and Automatic Thinking Questionnaire (ATQ) were used to evaluate the two groups at baseline, after 4 weeks of inter-venation, after 8 weeks of intervention, and at 3 months of follow-up. Results: The results of repeated measurement ANOVA showed that the interaction of each variable group and measurement time point had statistical significance (Ps < 0.05) . The results of simple effect analysis showed that the scores of each index were lower in the CBGT group than in the waiting control group from the beginning of the intervention (Ps < 0.05) The mediating effect analysis showed that the improvement of negative automatic thinking mediated the immediate and long-term changes in the group and the negative evaluation of fear symptoms (IE = 0.81, 95% * CI = 1.33 + 0.12) . Conclusion: Cognitive behavioral group intervention could improve the social anxiety symptoms of freshmen in higher vocational colleges, and the improvement of negative automatic thinking is an important intermediary factor to reduce the fear symptoms of negative evaluation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study explored the effectiveness of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) as a preventive intervention to enhance subjective well-being and resilience among emerging adults who have just graduated from high school. The research utilized a within-subject experimental design, comparing measurements from an intervention group of 8 participants, aged 17 to 20, who had recently graduated high school in the Jabodetabek area. Participants were selected based on their low to moderate scores on the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS). The intervention consisted of five offline sessions, which taught skills in mindfulness, cognitive defusion, values clarification, and committed action. Pre-test and post-test analyses using the Wilcoxon Paired Sample Test revealed no significant immediate increase in subjective well-being. However, a follow-up assessment three weeks later showed a significant improvement in subjective well-being, indicating that while initial changes were not significant, the intervention led to sustained improvements over time. In contrast, resilience scores showed no significant differences across pre-test, post-test, and follow-up measurements. These findings suggest that while ACT appears to be a promising intervention for improving subjective well-being in emerging adults, its impact on resilience may require further investigation. Future studies should consider exploring the effects of extended ACT interventions on resilience and the potential of incorporating additional methods to better capture long-term outcomes.

Abstract Background Sleep and mental health problems are very common in university students. The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of a multi-component sleep-mood intervention on improving sleep and mental health in university students with clinically significant insomnia symptoms, and to investigate possible mediators. Methods Thirty-five participants were randomized to the Sleep Mood Intervention: Live Effectively (SMILE) intervention (n = 23), or wait-list group (n = 12). SMILE is a multi-component group therapy and includes elements of cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I), mindfulness, and lifestyle modifications, in four weekly two-hour sessions. The primary outcome was insomnia severity. Secondary outcomes were severity of depression and anxiety, and quality of life (QoL). Dysfunctional beliefs and attitudes about sleep and pre-sleep arousal were assessed as mediators. Results Intention-to-treat analysis showed significant time x treatment interaction on insomnia symptoms p = .02, partial η²= 0.15, d = 0.84 [95% CI: 0.63 to 1.14], with significantly lower insomnia severity for SMILE compared to waitlist at post-test. No significant effects were found on depression d = 0.02 [95% CI: -0.35 to 0.37], anxiety d = 0.15 [95% CI: -0.16 to 0.53], and QoL d = 0.09 [95% CI: -0.25 to 0.42]. Dysfunctional beliefs mediated the effect on insomnia severity, but pre-sleep arousal did not. Conclusions This integrated group intervention is associated with reductions in insomnia symptoms in university students. Since no significant effects were detected on mood and QoL, future studies with larger sample size may explore the effects of this intervention on these outcomes. Trial registration Registry: Overzicht van Medisch-wetenschappelijk Onderzoek. Registration number: NL-OMON46359. Date of registration: September 18th, 2018.

Frailty in later life is often associated with functional declines and reduced quality of life. A multicomponent frailty management program (mFMP) is lacking in Singapore. This study aimed to determine the feasibility and effects of an mFMP in reducing frailty and increasing participation among frail community-living older adults. Pre- and postassessments at three time points were conducted to compare the differences in body functions between the mFMP (experimental group [EG]) and a fitness program (control group [CG]). Recruitment, dropouts, and fall data were collected. Weekly field notes and semistructured interviews postintervention were thematically analyzed. Sixteen out of 23 participants (EG: eight; CG: eight) completed the 12-week interventions with reduced frailty immediately postintervention. At 3-month postintervention, 10 participants (EG: five; CG: five) being followed up had a sustained level of frailty (p <.05). The EG and CG reported zero and two falls, respectively. The mFMP demonstrated its feasibility and exhibited a trend to facilitate personal behavioral changes postintervention. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Adolescents face many challenges when coping with out-of-home placement, and life story work can be helpful in this context. Typically conducted in individual settings, life story work’s high resource requirements pose a challenge for implementation in the standard care of youth welfare institutions. To address this issue, the ANKOMMEN intervention was developed as a manualized group program for adolescents in residential care focusing on processing and coping with experiences associated with their out-of-home placement. Method The intervention was evaluated in a single-arm pilot study with questionnaires administered at three time points (pre-intervention, post-intervention, and 3-month follow-up). The primary outcome was self-efficacy, while secondary outcomes included self-esteem, depressive symptoms, posttraumatic stress symptoms, and behavioral problems. A total of 31 intervention groups with 115 adolescents (M = 14.91 years; SD = 1.45; 52.2% male) were conducted between October 2020 and September 2022 in Germany. Data were analysed using mixed effect models. Results Pre-post comparisons revealed increased self-efficacy (d = −0.80) and self-esteem (d = −0.68) among participants with below-average scores prior to the intervention. Additionally, there was a decrease in self-reported depressive symptoms (d = 0.76), self-reported posttraumatic stress symptoms (d = 0.58), self-reported internalizing behavior problems (d = 0.74), caregiver-reported internalizing behavior problems (d = 0.76), and self-reported externalizing behavior problems (d = 0.52) for participants with clinically relevant scores prior to the intervention. These improvements were stable in the 3-month follow-up assessment. Furthermore, the intervention proved its feasibility in standard care within the context of the evaluation study. Conclusions The results of the pilot study provide preliminary evidence for the feasibility and potential effectiveness of ANKOMMEN but further research is needed to obtain valid evidence for the efficacy of the intervention.

Excessive and uncontrolled use of the Internet leads to Internet addiction and negatively affects the physical and mental health of adolescents. Normalization of the Internet and electronic gadgets during the COVID-19 pandemic increased the vulnerability of adolescents to developing behavioral dependency on Internet use. Intervention is needed to protect the formative years and to grow as responsible net users. Aim To study the effectiveness of psychoeducational module-based community intervention on Internet addiction in adolescents. Method This was a quasiexperimental study with pre- and post-test design. The study subjects were homogeneous and purposively selected single group from a secondary school in a city in southern India. Group intervention was executed for 5 to 6 hours with a prevalidated psychoeducation module on Internet addiction. The intervention focused on the prevention and control of Internet addiction. The level of Internet addiction was measured by using Kimberly Young’s Internet Addiction Test-20. Results Of the total of 144 subjects, 72% were males and 28% were females. All were 14–16 years of age and were well versed with Internet gadgets and smartphone use and self-reported the use of the Internet/gadgets for at least 2 hours a day for recreational purposes. Descriptive analysis and RMANOVA show interventions were significantly effective (P < 0.001). Among total participants, the Internet addiction found at preintervention was 44.75 ± 19.69, with a postintervention at first month of 34.73 ± 16.14 and a postintervention at second month of 28.84 ± 13.98; reduced duration of Internet use was significant (P < 0.001) at postintervention. Conclusion The psychoeducation module-based group intervention in community school settings is well accepted and effective on Internet addiction in adolescents.

Abstract Background Immigrant Latinas (who are foreign-born but now reside in the USA) are at greater risk for developing postpartum depression than the general perinatal population, but many face barriers to treatment. To address these barriers, we adapted the Mothers and Babies Course—an evidence-based intervention for postpartum depression prevention—to a virtual group format. Additional adaptations are inclusion of tailored supplemental child health content and nutrition benefit assistance. We are partnering with Early Learning Centers (ELC) across the state of Maryland to deliver and test the adapted intervention. Methods The design is a Hybrid Type I Effectiveness-Implementation Trial. A total of 300 participants will be individually randomized to immediate (N = 150) versus delayed (N = 150) receipt of the intervention, Mothers and Babies Virtual Group (MB-VG). The intervention will be delivered by trained Early Learning Center staff. The primary outcomes are depressive symptoms (measured via the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale), parenting self-efficacy (measured via the Parental Cognition and Conduct Towards the Infant Scale (PACOTIS) Parenting Self-Efficacy subscale), and parenting responsiveness (measured via the Maternal Infant Responsiveness Instrument) at 1-week, 3-month, and 6-month post-intervention. Depressive episodes (Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-V- Disorders Research Version) at 3-month and 6-month post-intervention will also be assessed. Secondary outcomes include social support, mood management, anxiety symptoms, perceived stress, food insecurity, and mental health stigma at 1-week, 3-month, and 6-month post-intervention. Exploratory child outcomes are dysregulation and school readiness at 6-month post-intervention. Intervention fidelity, feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness will also be assessed guided by the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. Discussion This study will be one of the first to test the efficacy of a group-based virtual perinatal depression intervention with Latina immigrants, for whom stark disparities exist in access to health services. The hybrid effectiveness-implementation design will allow rigorous examination of barriers and facilitators to delivery of the intervention package (including supplemental components) which will provide important information on factors influencing intervention effectiveness and the scalability of intervention components in Early Learning Centers and other child-serving settings. Registration. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05873569.

ObjectivesMethodsResultsConclusionsThis study sought to design, implement, and evaluate a 6-week skills-based telehealth group for dementia caregivers within a VA setting.The protocol was designed based on a CBT skill-building approach and was evaluated using the four levels of evaluation developed by Kirkpatrick (1998). Eight spousal caregivers of individuals with MCI or dementia participated in the pilot group within a VA geriatric clinic. Methods included comparison of pre- and post-intervention outcome measures (caregiver burden, depression, anxiety, flourishing) and inductive narrative analysis of qualitative feedback from participants.Qualitatively, the intervention was well received and participants identified several areas of subjective learning and skill implementation including increased behavioral and communication skills, knowledge, and connection with resources. However, paired-sample t-tests of group outcomes revealed no significant differences on measures of caregiver burden, depression, anxiety, and flourishing pre- and post-intervention.Based on Kirkpatrick’s levels of evaluation, this study revealed positive reception of a group-based intervention for dementia caregivers within a VA setting, but further investigation of intervention effectiveness is needed given the lack of significant change found on outcome measures. A virtual skills-based group may be a feasible option for dementia caregiver intervention within VA settings that warrants further investigation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Adolescents face many challenges when coping with out-of-home placement, and life story work can be helpful in this context. Typically conducted in individual settings, life story work's high resource requirements pose a challenge for implementation in the standard care of youth welfare institutions. To address this issue, the ANKOMMEN intervention was developed as a manualized group program for adolescents in residential care focusing on processing and coping with experiences associated with their out-of-home placement. Method: The intervention was evaluated in a single-arm pilot study with questionnaires administered at three time points (pre-intervention, post-intervention, and 3-month follow-up). The primary outcome was self-efficacy, while secondary outcomes included self-esteem, depressive symptoms, posttraumatic stress symptoms, and behavioral problems. A total of 31 intervention groups with 115 adolescents (M = 14.91 years; SD = 1.45; 52.2% male) were conducted between October 2020 and September 2022 in Germany. Data were analysed using mixed effect models. Results: Pre-post comparisons revealed increased self-efficacy (d = −0.80) and self-esteem (d = −0.68) among participants with below-average scores prior to the intervention. Additionally, there was a decrease in self-reported depressive symptoms (d = 0.76), self-reported posttraumatic stress symptoms (d = 0.58), self-reported internalizing behavior problems (d = 0.74), caregiver-reported internalizing behavior problems (d = 0.76), and self-reported externalizing behavior problems (d = 0.52) for participants with clinically relevant scores prior to the intervention. These improvements were stable in the 3-month follow-up assessment. Furthermore, the intervention proved its feasibility in standard care within the context of the evaluation study. Conclusions: The results of the pilot study provide preliminary evidence for the feasibility and potential effectiveness of ANKOMMEN but further research is needed to obtain valid evidence for the efficacy of the intervention. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Intervention programs for male intimate partner violence (IPV) perpetrators mostly use the group intervention modality. Notwithstanding, the literature has neglected the study of group-related variables and their possible association with these interventions' functioning and outcomes. This systematic review aimed to analyze group-related variables, their predictors, and their relation to the functioning and outcomes of intervention programs for IPV perpetrators. The systematic review was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The following databases were searched from inception to November 2022: Web of Science, Scopus, PUBMED, and PsycINFO. Of the 5,941 identified studies, 13 were included in the review. The main predictors of group-related variables were: intervention stage, motivational strategies, and leadership (counseling approach). The group-related variables as predictors of intervention outcomes were: group management behaviors and support (facilitator behavior within the group); positive confrontation, protherapeutic behavior, active involvement, positive interaction with peers, and positive interaction with the facilitator (participant behavior within the group); and group cohesion and group climate (group dynamics). Group cohesion and participants' protherapeutic behavior stood out for their association with positive treatment outcomes (i.e., greater participation and working alliance, lower rates of violent behavior during follow-up). The findings from this review suggest that group processes are key factors in intervention programs for IPV perpetrators, and a better understanding of how these group processes are shaped, and how they can contribute to positive program outcomes, provides a new approach and insights to improve their effectiveness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Reliable and systematic qualitative methodologies to assess participants' change after group interventions are scarce. This study outlines a methodolo5gical approach to use in focus groups, allowing the elicitation and coding of participants' change talk after a group intervention. A Change Elicitation Script for Focus Groups was developed and its viability for evoking participants' discussion around change was tested. Following a self-compassion intervention for teachers, participants' dialogue was examined in three focus groups following a simplified version of Innovative Moments Coding System for groups. Results suggest that the Change Elicitation Script for Focus Groups effectively prompted participants' discussion around change. The Innovative Moments Coding System for groups allowed to reliably identify, delimit, and categorize Innovative Moments throughout these dialogues. Although preliminary, this study puts forward a mixed-method methodology, applicable to the retrospective analysis of the process of change in post-intervention focus groups, from educational to clinical settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Journal of Shanghai University of Sport is the property of Editorial Department of Journal of Shanghai University of Sport and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

ABSTRACT: Excessive and uncontrolled use of the Internet leads to Internet addiction and negatively affects the physical and mental health of adolescents. Normalization of the Internet and electronic gadgets during the COVID-19 pandemic increased the vulnerability of adolescents to developing behavioral dependency on Internet use. Intervention is needed to protect the formative years and to grow as responsible net users. Aim: To study the effectiveness of psychoeducational module-based community intervention on Internet addiction in adolescents. Method: This was a quasiexperimental study with pre- and post-test design. The study subjects were homogeneous and purposively selected single group from a secondary school in a city in southern India. Group intervention was executed for 5 to 6 hours with a prevalidated psychoeducation module on Internet addiction. The intervention focused on the prevention and control of Internet addiction. The level of Internet addiction was measured by using Kimberly Young's Internet Addiction Test-20. Results: Of the total of 144 subjects, 72% were males and 28% were females. All were 14–16 years of age and were well versed with Internet gadgets and smartphone use and self-reported the use of the Internet/gadgets for at least 2 hours a day for recreational purposes. Descriptive analysis and RMANOVA show interventions were significantly effective (P < 0.001). Among total participants, the Internet addiction found at preintervention was 44.75 ± 19.69, with a postintervention at first month of 34.73 ± 16.14 and a postintervention at second month of 28.84 ± 13.98; reduced duration of Internet use was significant (P < 0.001) at postintervention. Conclusion: The psychoeducation module-based group intervention in community school settings is well accepted and effective on Internet addiction in adolescents. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Children and young people in foster and adoptive families are considered more vulnerable to a high level of mental health need when compared to peers who are not care-experienced or adopted. Acceptance of this view amongst clinical providers and policy makers has necessitated the development of specialist provision and dedicated care pathways within child and adolescent mental health services. In this provision, practitioner-initiated quality improvement projects help in appraising the effectiveness of clinical interventions in local contexts, as well as identifying areas for service learning and practice reflection. This article reports on the evaluation of a mentalisation-based psychoeducation group intervention for adoptive parents and foster carers. The evaluation activity took place in a single child and adolescent mental health service setting, starting during the COVID-19 pandemic, with the intervention being implemented online via videoconferencing. In the article, after introducing the intervention (based on the Family Minds model), an analysis of clinical data collected pre- and post-intervention is reported. Few results of the analysis regarding the two pre- and post-measures reached statistical significance, indicating only changes in the magnitude of stress in the parent/carer-child system. A series of reflections are posed that consider what this finding means in developing fit-for-purpose support for adoptive parents and foster carers in child and adolescent mental health service contexts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Immigrant Latinas (who are foreign-born but now reside in the USA) are at greater risk for developing postpartum depression than the general perinatal population, but many face barriers to treatment. To address these barriers, we adapted the Mothers and Babies Course—an evidence-based intervention for postpartum depression prevention—to a virtual group format. Additional adaptations are inclusion of tailored supplemental child health content and nutrition benefit assistance. We are partnering with Early Learning Centers (ELC) across the state of Maryland to deliver and test the adapted intervention. Methods: The design is a Hybrid Type I Effectiveness-Implementation Trial. A total of 300 participants will be individually randomized to immediate (N = 150) versus delayed (N = 150) receipt of the intervention, Mothers and Babies Virtual Group (MB-VG). The intervention will be delivered by trained Early Learning Center staff. The primary outcomes are depressive symptoms (measured via the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale), parenting self-efficacy (measured via the Parental Cognition and Conduct Towards the Infant Scale (PACOTIS) Parenting Self-Efficacy subscale), and parenting responsiveness (measured via the Maternal Infant Responsiveness Instrument) at 1-week, 3-month, and 6-month post-intervention. Depressive episodes (Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-V- Disorders Research Version) at 3-month and 6-month post-intervention will also be assessed. Secondary outcomes include social support, mood management, anxiety symptoms, perceived stress, food insecurity, and mental health stigma at 1-week, 3-month, and 6-month post-intervention. Exploratory child outcomes are dysregulation and school readiness at 6-month post-intervention. Intervention fidelity, feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness will also be assessed guided by the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. Discussion: This study will be one of the first to test the efficacy of a group-based virtual perinatal depression intervention with Latina immigrants, for whom stark disparities exist in access to health services. The hybrid effectiveness-implementation design will allow rigorous examination of barriers and facilitators to delivery of the intervention package (including supplemental components) which will provide important information on factors influencing intervention effectiveness and the scalability of intervention components in Early Learning Centers and other child-serving settings. Registration.: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05873569. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Although Schema Therapy has emerged as an effective treatment for a large range of psychopathology, there is limited research on its effectiveness with children and adolescents, especially for preventive purposes, in individual or group settings and with the involvement of parents. Therefore, the aim of this study was to conduct a preliminary evaluation of a newly developed group prevention program based on Schema Therapy (rationale, principles, and techniques) for children and their parents. It is a psychoeducational, developmentally-appropriate program addressing core emotional needs, early maladaptive schemas, schema modes, coping styles, and parent-child relationship with the aim of preventing the emergence of psychopathology in children. Participants were 90 Greek children (aged 9-13) who attended 16 weekly meetings and their parents who attended 10 biweekly meetings. The effectiveness of the program was evaluated with pre-and-post-intervention assessment (i.e., pre-experimental design). Children's early maladaptive schemas (self-reports) and strengths and difficulties (self- and parent-reports), as well as parents' early maladaptive schemas (self-reports) were assessed. Results showed a significant decrease in most early maladaptive schemas of children and in many early maladaptive schemas of parents. A significant decrease was found in children's emotional symptoms, peer relationship problems and total difficulties score and a significant increase in prosocial behavior. The supporting evidence for the effectiveness of the program and the necessity of evidence-based prevention programs based on Schema Therapy for children and parents are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Dysregulated eating behaviors, comprising subthreshold and clinical binge-eating disorder (BED) and bulimia nervosa (BN), are increasing among the general population, with a consequent negative impact on one's health and well-being. Despite the severity of these outcomes, people with BED and BN often face a delay in receiving a diagnosis or treatment, often due to difficulties in accessing care. Hence, evidence-based and sustainable interventions for eating symptomatology are needed. The present study aims to assess the effectiveness of a web-based 10-session multidisciplinary group intervention based on Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) for BED and BN, aimed at reducing psychological distress and binge-eating-related symptomatology in a sample of patients with dysregulated eating behaviors and including one session of nutritional therapeutic education. A total of 65 participants (84.6% F; age M = 38.5 ± 13.2; experimental group, N = 43; treatment-as-usual group, TAU, N = 22) took part in the study. The results show, after the 9 weekly sessions, a significant reduction in binge-eating-related symptomatology and general psychopathology and an increased self-esteem and eating self-efficacy in social contexts in the experimental group compared to the treatment-as-usual group (T0 vs. T1). Improvements in the experimental group were significantly maintained after one month from the end of the intervention (T2) in terms of binge-eating symptoms, general psychopathology, and eating self-efficacy in social contexts. This study supports the effectiveness of a brief web-based multidisciplinary group intervention in reducing eating symptomatology and psychological distress and enhancing self-esteem and eating self-efficacy in a group of people with dysregulated eating behaviors. Brief web-based interventions could represent an accessible and sustainable resource to address binge-eating-related symptomatology in public clinical settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: This study evaluated the acceptance, feasibility and safety of a short-term group program for adults (18 years and older) and youth (16 to 18 years) with borderline personality disorder (BPD) symptoms. Termed Road Maps, the content and development were informed by common treatment factors identified from evidence-based therapies for BPD. Method: Two-hundred and eight people consented to participate in the research trial and completed baseline measures. Intervention participants rated the acceptability and subjective experience of the group. Attrition rates informed feasibility, and serious adverse events were tracked to identify potential harms. Results: Participant post-group ratings of the group's acceptability and subjective experience were above average across both adult and youth populations. Attrition rate after commencement of group was 38% for adults and 27% among youth. The incidence rate of emergency department presentations was reduced by 41% in the 6 months post-group, relative to 6 months pre-group. Conclusions: The current study provides preliminary support for the acceptability and feasibility of a short-term group therapy program for people with a diagnosis of BPD. Road Maps may be a useful intermediate intervention in a broader model of stepped care. Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, https://www.anzctr.org.au/ACTRN12622000849796.aspx, (ACTRN12622000849796) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Patients living with various rare or orphan diseases (ROD) experience common psychosocial difficulties. Those need emerge from a combination of factors, such as the large variety of patients and the rarity of resources, as well as concentrated efforts on physical health needs that yielded increases in life expectancy and quality in patients. A gap is therefore rising in the consideration of psychosocial needs of patients, such as coping with the impacts of physical limitations, reducing social isolation and distress. To contribute to address this gap, we developed, pilot-tested and evaluated the acceptability, feasibility, implementation, and short-term effects of Connect-ROD, an online group intervention to support adult patients with a ROD (AP-ROD), which aims to improve coping mechanisms, reinforce sense of control, and support personal goals of AP-ROD. A qualitative study comprising of in-depth pretests, post-test interviews and standardized questionnaires, was conducted with 14 participants in two consecutive intervention groups. Results The Connect-ROD intervention is strongly anchored in acceptance and commitment therapy as well as community psychology approaches. A pilot test allowed us to improve on the initial structure and to produce a manualized 10-week program delivered online, made up of 2-h sessions comprising formal activities, exchanges and homework. The evaluation showed satisfactory acceptability and accessibility, compliant delivery by facilitators, and promising short-term effects on personal objectives, sense of control, coping mechanisms, symptom management, acceptance of the emotions associated with the disease, distress, self-efficacy, social support and connectedness. The program did not show short-term effects on overall quality of life. Conclusion It is recommended that Connect-ROD is evaluated on a larger scale. It seems promising to support various AP-ROD who live with the complex psychosocial consequences of their disease.

Abstract Background Children and adolescents growing up in child welfare institutions have been frequently exposed to traumatic events and psychosocial stress and show elevated rates of mental disorders. Yet, there is a lack of empirically supported treatments to provide adequate mental health care for children in care suffering from trauma-related mental disorders such as posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, and anxiety. The Cognitive Behavioral Intervention for Trauma in Schools (CBITS) is an evaluated trauma-focused cognitive-behavioral group intervention, which has proven to be effective in reducing symptoms of PTSD, depression, and anxiety for traumatized children in group settings. The trial will evaluate the effectiveness of the CBITS intervention as an outreach treatment compared with an enhanced treatment-as-usual condition (TAU +) within the German mental health and child welfare system. Methods In a randomized controlled trial (RCT) involving N = 90 children and adolescents, we will compare CBITS with TAU + . Participants between 8 and 16 years, reporting at least one traumatic event and moderate posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS), will be randomized within their child welfare institution to either one of the conditions using a CATS-2 severity-stratified block randomization. Assessments will take place at baseline, as well as 4 months and 10 months after baseline. The primary outcome is the severity of PTSS after 4 months. Secondary outcomes are depression, anxiety, irritability/anger, quality of life, and global functioning level. Discussion The results of our trial will provide evidence regarding effective treatment options for traumatized children in care, which represent an understudied population with limited access to mental health care. Additionally, it could serve as a blueprint for implementing trauma-focused outreach group treatments for children in care and increase the accessibility to appropriate treatment. Trial registration Clinical Trials.gov NCT06038357 D. September 13, 2023.

AbstractPurposeMaterials and MethodsResultsConclusions\nIMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONPeople who survive a subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) often face enduring health challenges including physical disability, fatigue, cognitive impairments, psychological difficulties, and reduced quality of life. While group interventions have shown positive results in addressing similar issues in chronic conditions, the evidence involving SAH specifically is still sparse. This service evaluation aimed to explore SAH survivors’ experiences of attending a multidisciplinary group-based support programme tailored to address unmet needs identified in previous literature, with the ultimate aim to refine future iterations of the programme and improve quality of care post-SAH.Semi-structured interviews were carried out with 12 individuals who attended the programme. The resulting data were analysed thematically.Four overarching themes emerged from the analysis: (1) Barriers to accessing support after a SAH, (2) Factors acting as enablers of recovery, (3) Sharing lived experience to support one another, (4) Feeling connected while navigating a group format.Lack of communication, fear, loneliness, and cognitive impairments can act as barriers to engagement with support, while acceptance and adjustment, holistic multidisciplinary input, and psychological support may represent successful enablers of recovery. Implications for future iterations of the programme as well as clinical rehabilitation and service development are discussed.A multidisciplinary group-based support programme may help rehabilitation following a subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH).Factors such as lack of communication, fear, loneliness, and cognitive impairments may act as barriers to engagement, while acceptance and adjustment, holistic multidisciplinary team input, and psychological support may enable recovery.Services may wish to monitor the effectiveness and frequency of their communication while making sure a clear pathway of support and established referral routes are in place when SAH patients are discharged from hospital.Providing participants with written materials to use during each session as well as allowing for more time to connect with one another other may help with cognitive difficulties during group sessions.A multidisciplinary group-based support programme may help rehabilitation following a subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH).Factors such as lack of communication, fear, loneliness, and cognitive impairments may act as barriers to engagement, while acceptance and adjustment, holistic multidisciplinary team input, and psychological support may enable recovery.Services may wish to monitor the effectiveness and frequency of their communication while making sure a clear pathway of support and established referral routes are in place when SAH patients are discharged from hospital.Providing participants with written materials to use during each session as well as allowing for more time to connect with one another other may help with cognitive difficulties during group sessions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This work aims to examine the identities communicated prior to and during a role-playing game (RPG) for individuals with acquired brain injury (ABI). Appraisal, an analysis tool of Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL), that allows one to examine the interpersonal metafunction, was applied to interview and RPG group treatment conversations. This allowed for the investigation of the evaluative language of five individuals with ABI. The analysis revealed that individuals were capable of using various resources of appraisal to communicate their identities and did so differently across contexts. SFL, specifically the analysis of appraisal, is a useful resource for examining the communication and negotiation of identity after ABI. This has implications for interventions that support and facilitate positive identity negotiation and thus, enhanced rehabilitation outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study examined the meaning of an eight-week group art therapy intervention with student veterans in a large public university in California. We focused on grounded theory methodology, to evaluate the meaning of the program for participants while bringing their art and narratives as active contributors to the formation of the theoretical frame relevant to their unique lived experience. A systemic analysis integrated clinical notes from the art therapist facilitating the group, pre- and post-intervention semi-structured interviews with all participants, and a systematic exploration of participants' art responses. Findings indicate that the group art therapy intervention reduced isolation and increased overall well-being while supporting the veterans' need to process trauma and grief through visual narratives and identity formation. The findings also suggest the need to reconsider the timing of trauma processing and the potential benefit of forming groups based on types of trauma experiences and gender-specific needs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Patients living with various rare or orphan diseases (ROD) experience common psychosocial difficulties. Those need emerge from a combination of factors, such as the large variety of patients and the rarity of resources, as well as concentrated efforts on physical health needs that yielded increases in life expectancy and quality in patients. A gap is therefore rising in the consideration of psychosocial needs of patients, such as coping with the impacts of physical limitations, reducing social isolation and distress. To contribute to address this gap, we developed, pilot-tested and evaluated the acceptability, feasibility, implementation, and short-term effects of Connect-ROD, an online group intervention to support adult patients with a ROD (AP-ROD), which aims to improve coping mechanisms, reinforce sense of control, and support personal goals of AP-ROD. A qualitative study comprising of in-depth pretests, post-test interviews and standardized questionnaires, was conducted with 14 participants in two consecutive intervention groups. Results: The Connect-ROD intervention is strongly anchored in acceptance and commitment therapy as well as community psychology approaches. A pilot test allowed us to improve on the initial structure and to produce a manualized 10-week program delivered online, made up of 2-h sessions comprising formal activities, exchanges and homework. The evaluation showed satisfactory acceptability and accessibility, compliant delivery by facilitators, and promising short-term effects on personal objectives, sense of control, coping mechanisms, symptom management, acceptance of the emotions associated with the disease, distress, self-efficacy, social support and connectedness. The program did not show short-term effects on overall quality of life. Conclusion: It is recommended that Connect-ROD is evaluated on a larger scale. It seems promising to support various AP-ROD who live with the complex psychosocial consequences of their disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Social skills support the development of a positive self-concept and engagement in a variety of life roles, habits, and routines. The Occupational Therapy Practice Framework clearly defines the occupational therapist’s role in working with children with difficulties in social skills; however, little research exists examining the effectiveness of occupational therapy-led group interventions to support social skills development. Incorporating parent training into social skill development can improve overall outcomes and reinforce skill development across contexts. Objective: The purpose of this pilot study was to determine whether an occupational therapy-led social skill group, combined with parent training, was effective in improving social skill outcomes in children with parent-reported social skill delays. Method: Occupational therapists developed collaborative social goals and implemented a social skills group intervention with eight school-aged children presenting with parent-reported social skill delays. In addition, occupational therapists provided parent training to support onsite interventions. Pretest and posttest data was collected and analyzed. Results: The results of this pilot study indicate that 8/8 children demonstrated progress in social skills on outcome measures including the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure and Goal Attainment Scaling. Conclusion: This pilot study supports the premise that occupational therapy-led social skills intervention groups, combined with parent training, are effective in promoting social skills. Occupational therapists and occupational therapy assistants have a clear role in designing and implementing group interventions to support social skill development. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Multilingual children living in areas with low socioeconomic status (SES) are at an increased risk of having speech, language and communication needs (SLCN). Many multilingual children with SLCN in Sweden have insufficient basic vocabulary knowledge in the majority language, preventing them from achieving the school's learning goals. However, there is a lack of studies of interventions that could improve vocabulary development in this group, and that can be delivered in an everyday educational setting. This pilot study evaluates the effect of a school-based vocabulary group intervention, which combines elements from shared book reading and the Lexicon Pirate method, on vocabulary skills. A non-randomised pretest–posttest control group design was used. Eighteen six- to seven-year-old multilingual children attending preschool class in low SES areas either received intervention (n = 9) or were included in a control group (n = 9). The intervention group participated in 12 intervention sessions over six weeks. Word knowledge, semantic fluency, and comprehension of semantic relations were assessed pre- and post-intervention. Results revealed that children in the intervention group demonstrated significant gains in knowledge of both trained and untrained words, compared to the control group. No effects were found on semantic fluency or comprehension of semantic relations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Stigma contributes to the negative social conditions persons with intellectual disabilities are exposed to, and it needs tackling at multiple levels. Standing Up for Myself is a psychosocial group intervention designed to enable individuals with intellectual disabilities to discuss stigmatising encounters in a safe and supportive setting and to increase their self-efficacy in managing and resisting stigma. Objectives: To adapt Standing Up for Myself to make it suitable as a digital intervention; to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of Digital Standing Up for Myself and online administration of outcome measures in a pilot; to describe usual practice in the context of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic to inform future evaluation. Design: Adaptation work followed by a single-arm pilot of intervention delivery. Setting and participants: Four third and education sector organisations. Individuals with mild-to-moderate intellectual disabilities, aged 16+, members of existing groups, with access to digital platforms. Intervention: Digital Standing Up for Myself intervention. Adapted from face-to-face Standing Up for Myself intervention, delivered over four weekly sessions, plus a 1-month follow-up session. Outcomes: Acceptability and feasibility of delivering Digital Standing Up for Myself and of collecting outcome and health economic measures at baseline and 3 months post baseline. Outcomes are mental well-being, self-esteem, self-efficacy in rejecting prejudice, reactions to discrimination and sense of social power. Results: Adaptation to the intervention required changes to session duration, group size and number of videos; otherwise, the content remained largely the same. Guidance was aligned with digital delivery methods and a new group member booklet was produced. Twenty-two participants provided baseline data. The intervention was started by 21 participants (four groups), all of whom were retained at 3 months. Group facilitators reported delivering the intervention as feasible and suggested some refinements. Fidelity of the intervention was good, with over 90% of key components observed as implemented by facilitators. Both facilitators and group members reported the intervention to be acceptable. Group members reported subjective benefits, including increased confidence, pride and knowing how to deal with difficult situations. Digital collection of all outcome measures was feasible and acceptable, with data completeness ≥ 95% for all measures at both time points. Finally, a picture of usual practice has been developed as an intervention comparator for a future trial. Limitations: The pilot sample was small. It remains unclear whether participants would be willing to be randomised to a treatment as usual arm or whether they could be retained for 12 months follow-up. Conclusions: The target number of groups and participants were recruited, and retention was good. It is feasible and acceptable for group facilitators with some training and supervision to deliver Digital Standing Up for Myself. Further optimisation of the intervention is warranted. Future work: To maximise the acceptability and reach of the intervention, a future trial could offer the adapted Digital Standing Up for Myself, potentially alongside the original face-to-face version of the intervention. Study registration: This study was registered as ISRCTN16056848. Funding: This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Public Health Research programme (NIHR award ref: 17/149/03) and is published in full in Public Health Research; Vol. 12, No. 1. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information. Plain language summary: People with intellectual disabilities (or 'learning disabilities' in United Kingdom language) are more likely to experience poor physical and mental health than the general population. Stigma (negative stereotypes, prejudice and discrimination) has been linked to lower self-esteem, quality of life, and mental and physical ill health. Efforts to empower people with intellectual disabilities themselves to challenge stigma with a view to improving well-being, health and self-esteem are lacking. In 2017, we developed Standing Up for Myself, a brief group-based programme for people with mild-to-moderate intellectual disabilities aged 16+ to address this gap. As this study got underway, face-to-face meetings were suspended due to the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. We used the opportunity to assess whether Standing Up for Myself could be delivered through web-based meetings. We adapted Standing Up for Myself for digital delivery, with close input from advisors with intellectual disabilities and experienced group facilitators. We then tested the digital version in charity and education settings to evaluate if Digital Standing Up for Myself could be delivered as planned and how acceptable it was to group facilitators and participants. Four groups, with a total of 22 members, signed up to try Digital Standing Up for Myself. One participant dropped out before starting Standing Up for Myself, and the other 21 continued until the end of the programme. Retention and attendance were good; participants on average attended four of the five sessions. Ninety per cent of the core programme requirements were fully delivered as detailed in the Digital Standing Up for Myself manual. Problems with technology were manageable, although facilitators found using the Standing Up for Myself Wiki platform (an online platform for storage and sharing of resources) difficult, particularly when sharing video content. Facilitators felt acceptable levels of privacy were achieved and there were no reports of undue distress. All facilitators and many group members said they would recommend Digital Standing Up for Myself to others. Group members shared how the programme benefitted them, noting increased awareness about disabilities, and for some increased confidence, pride and independence. Some had learnt how to stand up for themselves and manage difficult situations and took pride in this. Completing outcome and health cost measures via web-based meetings was acceptable and data were largely fully complete and useable. Scientific summary: Background: Approximately 1.4–2% of the UK population have an intellectual disability. Individuals with intellectual disabilities face substantial social and health inequalities and are at increased risk of experiencing mental health problems. One factor compounding these inequalities is the impact of stigma, whereby individuals experience negative stereotyping, prejudice and discrimination associated with intellectual disability. Interventions that seek to reduce stigma are needed at multiple levels. The Standing Up for Myself (STORM) programme targets the person with an intellectual disability themselves and seeks to empower them as agent of positive change. It seeks to empower individuals with intellectual disabilities to challenge stigma they face in everyday encounters, thus potentially improving well-being and reducing inequalities, alongside interventions at community and institutional/societal levels to reduce stigma. An earlier pilot of the STORM programme showed it to be a promising intervention which could be delivered in community, third sector (i.e. 'charities' that typically provide services to achieve social goals) and education settings to existing groups of individuals with intellectual disabilities, aged 16 years and above. Some issues were highlighted which were to be addressed as part of a feasibility study with the intention of progressing to a fully powered randomised controlled trial (RCT). The start of the feasibility study coincided with the outbreak of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and the first national lockdown during month 6 of the original project. Following a necessary pause, the study management team saw a unique opportunity to revise the study to examine the potential of STORM as a digital intervention. Adapting STORM to make it suitable for digital delivery would allow the programme to be available to a much wider audience and potentially future-proof it in the context of the ongoing pandemic. Extensive patient and public involvement (PPI) work generated evidence in line with the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (Evidence Standards Framework for Digital Health Technologies, 2019, www.nice.org.uk/Media/Default/About/what-we-do/our-programmes/evidence-standards-framework/digital-evidence-standards-framework.pdf) framework for digital health technologies and indicated that the creation of a digital version of STORM was important to potential future users and professionals. We, therefore, proposed to adapt the STORM programme for digital delivery to groups of individuals with mild-to-moderate intellectual disabilities. Working closely with PPI partners we planned, following adaptation of the intervention, to deliver the digital programme to four groups as part of a small pilot study. We also engaged experts on digital inclusion and learning design to ensure that the adapted digital version of STORM was optimised for engagement of people with intellectual disabilities and delivery by group facilitators with varying experience and skills in digital delivery. Objectives: to adapt the existing STORM intervention for online delivery (Digital STORM), ensuring the content, number of sessions and direct contact time were the same for both STORM and Digital STORM ; to pilot the Digital STORM intervention in order to investigate the feasibility of recruitment to and retention of participants in Digital STORM ; and adherence, fidelity and acceptability of Digital STORM , when delivered to groups of people with mild-to-moderate intellectual disabilities online; to test digital administration of the study outcome and health economics measures; to build on community assessments to describe what usual practice might look like for groups of people with mild-to-moderate intellectual disabilities in the wake of COVID-19, to inform a potential future trial. Methods: Design and procedure: Digital STORM was an adaptation of the original STORM intervention, designed for online delivery, piloted with four groups of young people and adults with mild-to-moderate intellectual disabilities. Adaptation and pilot work took place during months 14–21 of the overall 24-month project in distinct phases of work: Intervention adaptation (months 14–17) An Intervention Adaptation Group (IAG) was established to oversee the adaptation and report progress to oversight committees. The group included all members of the PPI advisory group (people with intellectual disabilities, the independent co-chair), experienced group facilitators from third and education sector organisations (from our stakeholder group), Mencap as our intervention delivery partner, digital inclusion experts and members of the research team. The focus of this group was to maximise access to and engagement with Digital STORM to ensure it would be inclusive and to address potential barriers to access to and/or engagement with the intervention. Pilot of Digital STORM (months 18–21) The adapted intervention was then piloted with four groups (N = 22). Priority was given to groups that had expressed interest in participating in STORM at the point of having to pause the original study in March 2020 due to the first national coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) lockdown. Of the four pilot groups, at least one would need to do some additional work to allow all its group members to access Digital STORM. This would allow us to explore 'live' how issues relating to access to technology, support, and provisions to ensure privacy are managed. Following delivery of the adapted digital intervention, pilot group facilitators were interviewed about their experiences to assess barriers and facilitators to implementation. Participants took part in focus groups to access their views on the intervention, the delivery mechanisms, and the intervention's subjective impact. The focus groups were co-led by a member of the PPI advisory group and a researcher in three cases and by a researcher alone in one case and recorded. Decision phase (month 22) Oversight committees met at regular intervals throughout the adaptation and pilot phases to monitor progress. They reviewed findings from the pilot against the progression criteria and made recommendations to the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) regarding the potential for a future funding application. Inclusion and exclusion criteria: Groups from third and education sector organisations were included where they had a willing facilitator and organisational support in place, were meeting or restarting meetings as a group for at least 3 further months and were willing to replace five of their meetings with Digital STORM. Groups needed at least three and no more than eight members with intellectual disabilities to participate. Groups were excluded if they were run as part of the National Health Service, or if some of their regular members declined taking part in Digital STORM and if it was not possible to find alternative meeting times for those who wanted to participate. Individual participants were included if they were aged 16 years or older, had mild-to-moderate intellectual disabilities, capacity to provide informed consent, were able to complete the outcome measures and could engage with the intervention in English. They needed to be a member of an established (educational, activity, social or self-advocacy focused) group; to have access to the internet, a device to join web meetings, and support to access web-based meetings when needed. Participants were excluded from the research if they did not provide consent. Intervention: Adaptation of the STORM intervention for delivery using web-based video meetings (Digital STORM), consisting of four weekly 90-minute sessions and a 90-minute follow-up session (delivered around 4 weeks after session four). An intervention manual and a Wiki (a web platform designed as both a repository of intervention resources and an aide to delivering session content) was provided to facilitators. Outcomes: The primary outcome of the adaptation phase was the feasibility and acceptability of delivering STORM to groups in a web-delivered format (Digital STORM). Secondary outcomes of the adaptation phase were the feasibility of remotely collecting outcomes, health economics and process data and the description of 'Usual practice', that is, activities usually undertaken within the group setting, in a changed service delivery context. Analyses: Pilot data (baseline demographics, responses to outcome measures, adherence and fidelity ratings) were described descriptively. The feasibility of economic evaluation was assessed using completion rates of included measures [Service Information Schedule (SIS), EuroQol-Youth version, and Client Service Receipt Inventory]. Intervention costs were calculated using SIS data. Qualitative interviews and focus groups were conducted to explore barriers and facilitators to participation in the intervention. Interview and focus group transcripts were analysed thematically using Framework analysis; a sample of transcripts was double coded. Progression criteria were included to determine suitability for moving to a future trial of Digital STORM. Results: The STORM intervention was successfully adapted for online delivery (objective 1). The IAG addressed issues such as access to the digital intervention, engagement with it and potential risks to managing participant privacy. Minor adjustments were made to the STORM intervention to allow for digital delivery. Content was slightly streamlined to ensure each session could be covered within the 60-minute sessions. Resources were created to support participation in online group work (for participants) and for running sessions (for facilitators). A revised intervention logic model for Digital STORM was also created. Digital STORM was both feasible and acceptable when delivered to groups online (objective 2). Targets for recruitment into the pilot of Digital STORM were met with 4 groups taking part and 22 participants providing informed consent, 1 of whom dropped out before starting the intervention. There was good attendance across sessions (median attendance 5 out of 5 sessions, with 20 of 21 participants attending 3 or more sessions) and the majority of participants missed no more than 15 minutes of any one intervention session due to technical difficulties. Accordingly, there was a strong indicator of feasibility for progression to a future trial. There was also a strong indicator for the acceptability of Digital STORM. Facilitators found the recording of sessions acceptable and over 90% of the core intervention requirements were met in full. Feasibility and acceptability were also examined through interviews (with facilitators) and focus groups (with participants). Resources supported facilitators' delivery of sessions though some reported challenges when playing and sharing videos in online meetings and with trying to co-ordinate moving between video sharing via the STORM Wiki platform, the manual and operating the meeting platform. Feasibility of administering study outcome measures was also demonstrated (objective 3). Participants completed outcome measures via web-based platforms at baseline and post intervention. This enabled the research team to recruit from a wider geographical area than would have been possible using face-to-face data collection methods. Data completeness was very high – only one response was missing across all measures. Similarly, data completeness for economic evaluation was very good with no barriers to future data collection identified. Group members' experience of completing measures was positive and they felt positive about the digital approach as a method for data collection in future. Finally, it was determined that many organisations delivering group sessions had made the transition to online delivery and were running virtual groups. This supports the possibility of including a control arm that described 'usual practice' as part of a future trial (objective 4). Conclusions: The STORM digital adaptation and pilot was a well-delivered package of work. Results evidence that all progression criteria were achieved in full. Oversight committees therefore recommend progression to a full trial. Strengths and limitations: The key strength of this work was the ability of the team to work flexibly and creatively to adapt to the changing situation of the pandemic. Involvement of experts by experience meant the rationale for creating a digital version of STORM was supported by all stakeholders and the accessibility of the processes and resources was considered carefully from a user perspective. A number of limitations need noting. These include the small sample size for the pilot; long-term retention was not established; those taking part all did so with the knowledge they would receive the intervention, thus the ability to randomise was not confirmed; the video sharing platform was not optimal – other approaches might have worked better; qualitative work could not capture the views of all those who took part in the pilot. Study registration: This study was registered as ISRCTN16056848. Funding: This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Public Health Research programme (NIHR award ref: 17/149/03) and is published in full in Public Health Research; Vol. 12, No. 1. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Psychological Science is the property of Psychological Science Editorial Office and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of European Journal of Social Work is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Background: Although the survival rates of childhood cancer are increasing, children diagnosed as having cancer experience psychological and physical problems and a declining quality of life (QOL). Methods: A systematic review of PubMed databases was conducted up to September 2023 to identify studies reporting the effects of group exercise intervention in children with cancer. The inclusion criteria were pre-specified, including children aged ≤19 years old who received group exercise intervention and interventional studies written in English. Studies involving non-exercise intervention or non-group intervention were excluded. Results: Five studies were included in the present review. In three studies, QOL and physical parameters were improved after group exercise intervention, and in two studies, only physical parameters were improved. Improvements in QOL were achieved through psychosocial variables, improved scores of subscales of pain and hurt, nausea, and procedure-related anxiety, and reduced cancer-related fatigue. All studies had high numbers of participants who completed the intervention. However, all studies showed a high risk of bias regarding the selection of the reported results, and most studies showed a high risk of bias regarding deviations from the intended intervention and outcome measurement. Conclusion: The reviewed studies showed that group exercise intervention for children with cancer could improve their QOL and/or physical parameters.

Human rights education has an encouraging effect on children's school routine. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effectiveness of a 12‐session transformative human rights education intervention in improving children's school adjustment. Participants were 340 Greek primary school students assigned to intervention group (n = 187) and control group (n = 153). All members completed a written questionnaire 1 week before the implementation of the intervention, measuring their knowledge of human rights, school engagement, perceptions of the school environment, interpersonal relationships, empathy and perceptions, attitudes and feelings towards school. The completion process of the same questionnaire was repeated 1 week after the termination of the intervention and 4 months later. The results showed that the intervention was particularly beneficial as the intervention group members demonstrated a significant increase in their knowledge of human rights, school engagement, perceptions of the school environment, empathy and school liking, while experiencing a significant decrease in school avoidance and loneliness. Members of the control group did not report any significant improvement over time. The study's implications for future research on school‐based human rights interventions are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Metacognitive Training for Depression (D-MCT) is a highly structured group therapy that has been shown to be effective in reducing depressive symptoms. First evidence suggests that need for control represents a mechanism of change. However, more research is needed to evaluate the mode of action of each module and identify predictors of treatment response. Two sequential studies (one naturalistic pilot study [study I, N = 45] and one randomized controlled trial [study II, N = 32]) were conducted to evaluate the session-specific effects and predictors of D-MCT in patients with depression. The D-MCT was conducted over eight weeks, and patients answered a questionnaire on dysfunctional beliefs (e.g., negative filter) and depressive symptoms (e.g., lack of energy, self-esteem) before and after each session. Linear mixed-effects models showed that several dysfunctional beliefs and symptoms improved over the course of the treatment; three modules were able to evoke within-session effects, but no between-session effects were found. The improvement in lack of energy in one module was identified as a relevant predictor in study I via lasso regression but was not replicated in study II. Exploratory analyses revealed further predictors that warrant replication in future studies. The identified predictors were inconclusive when the two studies were compared, which may be explained by the different instruments administered. Even so, the results may be used to revise questionnaires and improve the intervention. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

AbstractBackground: This study pilot tested Moving On In My Recovery (MOIMR), a 12-session, acceptance-based, cognitive-behavioral, manual-guided group program for individuals in recovery from substance use. MOIMR aims to bridge the gap between formal treatment and sustained recovery. Method: Participants were 61 people in recovery from substance use and in the catchment area of the Betsi Cadwaladr Health Board, North Wales, United Kingdom. Using a variety of questionnaires, participants’ psychological flexibility and wellbeing were assessed at baseline, post-treatment, and a three-month follow-up. Participants who dropped out were contacted at the follow-up and interviewed about their experience. Results: The study successfully recruited participants from real-world treatment services. During the study, significant improvements were observed in participants’ social functioning, experiential avoidance, recovery capital, low mood, and anxiety. The proportion of participants who achieved abstinence also improved. Qualitative feedback confirmed the benefits that participants derived from attending the MOIMR groups. Conclusion: The program offered significant benefits for the participants despite many of them having apprehensions about undertaking a group-based approach. The gains established by quantitative analysis appeared to be supported by the qualitative findings. These findings suggest that a full randomized controlled trial of MOIMR would be feasible. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Large numbers of people showing complex presentations of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in the NHS Talking Therapies services routinely require multi-faceted and extended one-to-one National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) recommended treatment approaches. This can lead to longer waits for therapy and prolong patient suffering. We therefore evaluated whether a group stabilisation intervention delivered to patients on the waitlist for individual trauma-focused psychological treatment could help address this burden. Aims: The study aimed to ascertain a trauma-focused stabilisation group's acceptability, feasibility, and preliminary clinical benefit. Method and results: Fifty-eight patients with PTSD waiting for trauma-focused individual treatment were included in the study. Two therapists delivered six 5-session groups. The stabilisation group was found to be feasible and acceptable. Overall, PTSD symptom reduction was medium to large, with a Cohen's d of.77 for intent-to-treat and 1.05 for per protocol analyses. Additionally, for depression and anxiety, there was minimal symptom deterioration. Conclusions: The study provided preliminary evidence for the acceptability, feasibility and clinical benefit of attending a psychoeducational group therapy whilst waiting for one-to-one trauma therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Adolescence represents a critical period of development for forming a sense of self. Though many studies have focused on the negative effects of racism and discrimination on the identity development of Black youth, little research has been conducted on the protective nature of culture and racial socialization. Fewer studies describe interventions for healthy racial socialization. This study seeks to address this gap by evaluating the acceptability of a pilot multifamily group intervention focusing on positive racial socialization. Three adolescent and caretaker families took part in this pilot program. Acceptability and feasibility were measured through attendance rates and scores on satisfaction questionnaires completed by all participants. Findings suggest that the group was well-received as evidenced by attendance rates and feedback. Both youths and parents demonstrated strong attendance, rated the intervention highly, and expressed that the group both facilitated and increased confidence in discussing race, pride, and coping with discrimination. This study is the first multifamily group intervention aimed at improving racial pride in adolescents to our knowledge and opens the door to the development of similar interventions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Mental health and quality of life are commonly affected following a stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA) diagnosis, although many people are discharged without clear information about their psychological impact. Evidence suggests psychological interventions can be successfully delivered via remote methods (e.g. videoconferencing, telephone). However, it is unclear whether such interventions are effective for people post-stroke/TIA. This scoping review aimed to identify current evidence for remote group-based psychological interventions for people following TIA and stroke. Methods: Four electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Scopus) were searched for articles on online group psychological interventions post-TIA and stroke. Four reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts and full texts, then two authors extracted data for included studies. A bespoke data extraction form was used to describe interventions, informed by Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklists. Results: The search yielded 1333 studies, from which six were included in the review. Four were feasibility studies (two randomised controlled trials, two single-group pre-/post-design). All interventions targeted stroke survivors; no studies targeted people with TIA. Delivery methods included teleconferencing, videoconferencing, an online platform (virtual multiuser world) and a hybrid approach using videoconferencing and face-to-face visits. Remote intervention components were delivered in the community or at participants' homes. All studies included a mood measure. Improvement in mood and/or quality of life was reported across the four studies. Conclusions: More research is needed to explore and confirm the potential benefits of remote delivery of group psychological interventions following stroke and TIA. Better reporting of implementation barriers/facilitators and more high-quality research are required to determine the effectiveness of remote interventions. Evidence suggests remotely delivered interventions can support psychological issues following stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA). However, it is unclear whether this approach is effective and acceptable. This review aimed to identify current evidence for remote group-based psychological interventions post-TIA/stroke. Six studies involving stroke patients were reviewed. No studies included TIA patients. Improved mood and/or quality of life was reported in the four studies. More research is needed to explore the potential benefits of, and barriers to, remote group-based interventions in this population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Acta Comportamentalia is the property of Instituto de Psicologia y Educacion de la Universidad Veracruzana and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Long-Covid symptoms and increased psychological distress have been recognised to have had a significant longterm impact on those who were hospitalised due to Covid-19. To address the needs of this population, the Lothian Mental Health after Covid-19 Hospitalisation (MACH) Service developed and delivered a pilot group intervention which offered psychoeducation and a space to connect with others. The present article seeks to evaluate this group intervention, learning from its successes and challenges to better inform future interventions for this population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Enhancing personal recovery in persons with personality disorders is an important but understudied topic. Guided by the framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions of the U.K. Medical Research Council, this study follows a qualitative approach with the first aim of using the best scientific, professional, and client expertise to design a narrative intervention aiming for personal recovery in persons with personality disorders. The second aim was to assess the feasibility of the intervention in a practice setting before an effectiveness study can be conducted. The prototype included a 12-week intervention "An Empowering Story" consisting of weekly group sessions with homework and a life story book as final product. Both studies show that the overall aim and structure of the intervention are highly appreciated by professionals as well as clients. The preliminary findings pave the way to examine the effectiveness of "An Empowering Story" in a controlled study. Public Significance Statement: The present study suggests that a 12-week group narrative intervention may be helpful in enhancing personal recovery in individuals with personality disorders. Writing assignments support the exploration of new perspectives on their lives, which are shared within the group and documented in a digital application to print a unique life story book. Both patients and clinicians appreciate the intervention, which is especially appropriate during the last part of a psychotherapeutic treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background : Nearly a quarter of Canada's population suffers from chronic pain, a long-lasting medical condition marked by physical pain and psychological suffering. Opioids are the primary treatment for pain management in this condition; yet, this approach involves several undesirable side effects. In contrast to this established approach, non-pharmacological interventions, such as medical hypnosis, represent an efficient alternative for pain management in the context of chronic pain. HYlaDO is a self-hypnosis program designed to improve pain management for people with chronic pain. Purpose : This research aimed to evaluate the HYlaDO program based on the proof-of-concept level of the ORBIT model and investigated participants' subjective experience. Research design : Qualitative study. Study sample : Seventeen participants with chronic pain took part in this study. Data collection : We conducted individual semi-structured interviews with patients who had participated in HYlaDO to identify the three targets of desired change: pain, anxiety and autonomy in self-hypnosis practice. Results : Thematic analysis revealed that the practice of hetero-hypnosis and self-hypnosis decreased (i) pain and (ii) anxiety. Also, it (iii) indicated the development of an independent and beneficial self-hypnosis practice by having integrated the techniques taught. Conclusion : These results confirm that the established targets were reached and support further development, implementation and scaling up of this program. Consequently, we believe it is justified to move to the next step of program development. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Although the survival rates of childhood cancer are increasing, children diagnosed as having cancer experience psychological and physical problems and a declining quality of life (QOL). Methods: A systematic review of PubMed databases was conducted up to September 2023 to identify studies reporting the effects of group exercise intervention in children with cancer. The inclusion criteria were pre-specified, including children aged ≤19 years old who received group exercise intervention and interventional studies written in English. Studies involving non-exercise intervention or non-group intervention were excluded. Results: Five studies were included in the present review. In three studies, QOL and physical parameters were improved after group exercise intervention, and in two studies, only physical parameters were improved. Improvements in QOL were achieved through psychosocial variables, improved scores of subscales of pain and hurt, nausea, and procedure-related anxiety, and reduced cancer-related fatigue. All studies had high numbers of participants who completed the intervention. However, all studies showed a high risk of bias regarding the selection of the reported results, and most studies showed a high risk of bias regarding deviations from the intended intervention and outcome measurement. Conclusion: The reviewed studies showed that group exercise intervention for children with cancer could improve their QOL and/or physical parameters. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]