Search

Key summary points: Aim: To compare hand-held ultrasound (HH-US) to stationary ultrasound (S-US) in muscle assessment for detection of sarcopenia in acutely hospitalised older adults. Findings: Rater 1 had 'substantial' agreement between HH-US and S-US (κ = 0.77), whereas Rater 2 had 'almost perfect' agreement (κ = 0.92). Finally, no significant differences were seen on any US variables among the two raters when comparing the results from both HH-US and S-US. Message: HH-US scanners could be feasible, valid, and reliable for detection of loss of muscle mass associated with sarcopenia in acutely admitted older patients, in the hands of an experienced examiner. Background and purpose: Sarcopenia is a growing health concern among geriatric patients. Early diagnostics is importance to intervene and better muscle status and thus physical function. Ultrasound can be a valuable tool for patient-near diagnostics of sarcopenia. In recent time, ultrasound devices have evolved from larger stationary devices to minor hand-held devices that are more portable. However, the literature lacks research comparing quality of the different devices. The purpose of this study was to compare hand-held ultrasound (HH-US) to stationary ultrasound (S-US) in muscle assessment for detection of sarcopenia in acutely hospitalized older adults. Methods: A cross-sectional study using a convenience sample of acutely admitted older patients examined with both HH-US and S-US within a single session by the same examiner. Image analysis was performed using ImageJ, and was conducted by two raters: Rater 2 an experienced US examiner and Rater 1 an US examiner who received training from Rater 2. The Ultrasound sarcopenia index (USI) was used for evaluating sarcopenia. Validity and reliability of HH-US were analyzed using Cohen's Kappa and Student's t-test. Results: 21 participants (mean age 83.4 years, 52% female). Results showed "substantial" intra-rater reliability (κ = 0.77 for Rater 1) and 'near-perfect' validity (κ = 0.92 for Rater 2). Inter-rater comparisons revealed no significant differences (p < 0.05). Conclusion: HH-US is a potential method for detection of sarcopenia in acutely hospitalized older adults. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Ultrasound is a crucial and effective diagnostic tool in medicine. Recent advancements in technology have led to increased use of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS). Access to ultrasound equipment and training programs in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) is limited. Despite the World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations for universal antenatal ultrasounds, POCUS for reproductive health applications has not been widely used in LMICs. We describe here the feasibility of implementation of a training of obstetrics point-of-care ultrasound (OB POCUS) for high-risk conditions in rural public healthcare facilities in Kenya with partnership from Butterfly Network, Global Ultrasound Institute, and Kenyatta University. Methods As part of the initiation of a large-scale implementation study of OB POCUS, clinician trainees were recruited from rural Kenyan hospitals for participation in a series of five-day POCUS workshops held between September and December 2022. Trainers provided brief didactic lessons followed by hands-on training with live models and at regional clinical sites for 5 OB POCUS applications. Instructor-observed assessment of students’ scanning and image interpretation occurred over the training period. Assessment of knowledge and confidence was performed via an online pre-test and post-test as well as Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) was administered at course completion. Results Five hundred and fourteen mid-level Health Care Providers (HCPs) in Kenya were trained over a three-month period through in-person didactic sessions, bedside instruction, and clinical practice over a 5-day period with a trainer: trainee ratio of approximately 1:5. Out of the 514 trained HCPs, 468 were from 8 rural counties with poor maternal and neonatal outcomes, while the remaining 46 were from nearby facilities. OB POCUS topics covered included: malpresentation, multiple gestation, fetal cardiac activity, abnormalities of the placenta and amniotic fluid volume. There was marked improvement in the post training test scores compared to the pretest scores. Conclusion Our implementation description serves as a guide for successful rapid dissemination of OB POCUS training for mid-level providers. Our experience demonstrates the feasibility of a short intensive POCUS training to rapidly establish specific POCUS skills in efforts to rapidly scale POCUS access and services. There is a widespread need for expanding access to ultrasound in pregnancy through accessible OB POCUS training programs. An implementation study is currently underway to assess the patient and systems-level impact of the training.

Background: Ultrasound is a crucial and effective diagnostic tool in medicine. Recent advancements in technology have led to increased use of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS). Access to ultrasound equipment and training programs in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) is limited. Despite the World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations for universal antenatal ultrasounds, POCUS for reproductive health applications has not been widely used in LMICs. We describe here the feasibility of implementation of a training of obstetrics point-of-care ultrasound (OB POCUS) for high-risk conditions in rural public healthcare facilities in Kenya with partnership from Butterfly Network, Global Ultrasound Institute, and Kenyatta University. Methods: As part of the initiation of a large-scale implementation study of OB POCUS, clinician trainees were recruited from rural Kenyan hospitals for participation in a series of five-day POCUS workshops held between September and December 2022. Trainers provided brief didactic lessons followed by hands-on training with live models and at regional clinical sites for 5 OB POCUS applications. Instructor-observed assessment of students' scanning and image interpretation occurred over the training period. Assessment of knowledge and confidence was performed via an online pre-test and post-test as well as Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) was administered at course completion. Results: Five hundred and fourteen mid-level Health Care Providers (HCPs) in Kenya were trained over a three-month period through in-person didactic sessions, bedside instruction, and clinical practice over a 5-day period with a trainer: trainee ratio of approximately 1:5. Out of the 514 trained HCPs, 468 were from 8 rural counties with poor maternal and neonatal outcomes, while the remaining 46 were from nearby facilities. OB POCUS topics covered included: malpresentation, multiple gestation, fetal cardiac activity, abnormalities of the placenta and amniotic fluid volume. There was marked improvement in the post training test scores compared to the pretest scores. Conclusion: Our implementation description serves as a guide for successful rapid dissemination of OB POCUS training for mid-level providers. Our experience demonstrates the feasibility of a short intensive POCUS training to rapidly establish specific POCUS skills in efforts to rapidly scale POCUS access and services. There is a widespread need for expanding access to ultrasound in pregnancy through accessible OB POCUS training programs. An implementation study is currently underway to assess the patient and systems-level impact of the training. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

He Chen,1 Ming Han,2 Hui Jing,1 Zhao Liu,1 Haitao Shang,1 Qiucheng Wang,1 Wen Cheng1 1Department of Ultrasound, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin City, Heilongjiang Province, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of General Surgery, Heji Hospital of Changzhi Medical College, Changzhi City, Shanxi Province, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence: Wen Cheng; Qiucheng WangDepartment of Ultrasound, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, No. 150, Haping Road, Nangang District, Harbin City, 150081, Heilongjiang Province, People’s Republic of ChinaTel +86 13313677182; +86 13836134350Fax +86 45185718392Email hrbchengwen@163.com; haerbincss@126.comPurpose: This study aimed to evaluate the dependability of automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) compared with handheld ultrasound (HHUS) and mammography (MG) on the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category and size assessment of malignant breast lesions.Patients and Methods: A total of 344 confirmed malignant lesions were recruited. All participants underwent MG, HHUS, and ABUS examinations. Agreements on the BI-RADS category were evaluated. Lesion size assessed using the three methods was compared with the size of the pathological result as the control. Regarding the four major molecular subtypes, correlation coefficients between size on imaging and pathology were also evaluated.Results: The agreement between ABUS and HHUS on the BI-RADS category was 86.63% (kappa = 0.77), whereas it was 32.22% (kappa = 0.10) between ABUS and MG. Imaging lesion size compared to pathologic lesion size was assessed correctly in 36.92%/52.91% (ABUS), 33.14%/48.84% (HHUS) and 33.44%/43.87% (MG), with the threshold of 3 mm/5 mm, respectively. The correlation coefficient of size of ABUS-Pathology (0.75, Spearman) was statistically higher than that of the MG-Pathology (0.58, Spearman) with P < 0.01, but not different from that of the HHUS-Pathology (0.74, Spearman) with P > 0.05. The correlation coefficient of ABUS-Pathology was statistically higher than that of MG-Pathology in the triple-negative subtype, luminal B subtype, and luminal A subtype (P< 0.01).Conclusion: The agreement between ABUS and HHUS in the BI-RADS category was good, whereas that between ABUS and MG was poor. ABUS and HHUS allowed a more accurate assessment of malignant tumor size compared to MG.Keywords: automated breast ultrasound, hand-held ultrasound, mammography, breast imaging reporting and data system category, size assessment

A variety of hand-held ultrasound (HHU) machines have recently become available and offer different capabilities and features. Despite the differences of the individual HHU devices, all offer the potential for faster diagnoses and are more sensitive than clinical assessment in identifying cardiovascular abnormalities. In addition, they provide enhanced transportability, can potentially reduce waiting time for full echocardiograms, and may save health-care resources. Significant potential for the growth of HHU as a tool to facilitate patient care exists when performed by well-trained and competent providers is anticipated. This paper presents the characteristics, benefits, limitations, and future perspectives of HHU devices. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background & objectives: Breast cancer being one of the most common malignant tumours among women, diagnostic modalities for early detection of the same become of paramount importance. In this context, the hand-held ultrasound (HHUS) and automated breast volume scanner (ABVS) could provide valuable information for clinicians to diagnose breast diseases. This study aimed to compare and evaluate the diagnostic performance of combined use of HHUS and ABVS for the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions. Methods: A total of 361 female patients, who underwent both HHUS and ABVS examinations were included in this study. ABVS and HHUS images were interpreted using the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS). The distributions of the BI-RADS categories and pathology results were shown as specific numbers. Kappa coefficients test (κ) was calculated to compare the diagnostic results amongst the ABVS, HHUS and ABVS combined with HHUS. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of the three diagnostic methods were calculated and their respective diagnostic performance was analyzed by receiver operator characteristic curve. Results: Of a total of 431 lesions, 153 (35.5%) were malignant and 278 (64.5%) were benign. With respect to the pathology results, the value of κ was 0.713 (P<0.001) for HHUS, κ=0.765 (P<0.001) for ABVS and κ=0.815 (P<0.001) for HHUS+ABVS. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV and NPV for HHUS combined with ABVS were 96.08 (147/153), 88.49 (246/278), 91.18 (393/431), 82.12 (147/179) and 97.62 per cent (246/252) respectively. For HHUS, these were 90.20 (138/153), 84.17 (234/278), 86.31 (372/431), 75.82 (138/182) and 93.98 per cent (234/249) respectively; and for ABVS these were 92.16 (141/153), 87.05 (242/278), 88.86 (383/431), 79.66 (141/177) and 95.28 per cent (242/254), respectively. There was no significant difference amongst these three methods, but the diagnostic performance of HHUS combined with ABVS was better than, or at least equal to, that of HHUS or ABVS alone. Interpretation & conclusions: The results of this study suggest that ABVS is a promising and advantageous modality for breast cancer detection. Furthermore, the combination of HHUS and ABVS showed a more comparable diagnostic performance than HHUS or ABVS alone for distinguishing between benign and malignant breast lesions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Data about the epidemiology of valvular heart disease (VHD) in the elderly is scarce. Hand-held ultrasound devices (HUDs) enable point-of-care ultrasound scanning (POCUS) but their use in an elderly population has not been reported for VHD screening in primary practice. Methods: One hundred consecutive subjects aged >70 years without a VHD diagnosis had 2D and colour Doppler POCUS by an accredited sonographer, using a contemporary HUD (Vscan), in a primary practice setting. Patients with left-sided valve pathology identified by Vscan were referred for formal echo in the local tertiary cardiac centre. Results: Mean age (s.d.) was 79.08 (3.74) years (72–92 years); 61 female. By Vscan, we found five patients with ≥moderate aortic stenosis (AS), eight with ≥moderate mitral regurgitation (MR) and none with ≥moderate aortic regurgitation. In the AS and MR groups each, one patient had valve intervention following from the initial diagnosis by Vscan, two and one respectively are under follow-up in the valve clinic, while two and four respectively refused TTE or follow-up. Two patients with moderate MR by Vscan had mild and mild/moderate MR respectively by TTE and were discharged. Total cost for scanning 100 patients was $18,201 – i.e. $182/patient. Conclusions: Screening with a hand-held scanner (Vscan), we identified 5/100 elderly subjects who needed valve replacement or follow-up in valve clinic, at a cost of $182/patient. These findings have potential significance for the allocation of resources in the context of an ageing population.

Purpose The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability of automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) examinations of suspicious breast masses in comparison to handheld breast ultrasound (HHUS) with regard to Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category assessment, and to investigate the factors affecting discrepancies in categorization. Methods A total of 135 masses that were assessed as BI-RADS categories 4 and 5 on ABUS that underwent ultrasound (US)-guided core needle biopsy from May 2017 to December 2017 were included in this study. The BI-RADS categories were re-assessed using HHUS. Agreement of the BI-RADS categories was evaluated using kappa statistics, and the positive predictive value of each examination was calculated. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the mammography and US findings associated with discrepancies in the BI-RADS categorization. Results The overall agreement between ABUS and HHUS in all cases was good (79.3%, kappa=0.61, P

Introduction: Hand-held imaging devices are widely used in clinical practice and are a useful tool. There is no published review examining the diagnostic parameters achieved with these devices in clinical practice. Methods: We searched three online medical literature databases (PubMed, EMBASE and MEDLINE) for all literature published up until January 2018. We selected studies that (1) were conducted in the adult population; (2) used a truly hand-held device; (3) featured sensitivities and/or specificities on the use of the hand-held scanner. We extracted and summarised the diagnostic metrics from the literature. Results: Twenty-seven articles were excluded from the initial 56 relevant articles, as the device featured was not truly hand-held. Ultimately a total of 25 studies were analysed. Sixteen studies were carried out by experienced users, seven by users with little previous experience and two studies by nurses. High diagnostic parameters were achieved by all three groups when scanning cardiac pathology and intra-abdominal structures. Training of non-expert users varied, taking a mean of 21.6 h. These hand-held devices can change diagnoses at the bedside and be used as gate-keepers to formal echocardiography. Individual studies show them to be cost-effective. Conclusion: Hand-held echocardiography is a useful tool in the hands of experts and novices alike. Studies conducted are highly heterogeneous making it difficult to pool data for the diagnostic metrics. Further studies with rigorous methodology are needed to evaluate the true diagnostic potential in the hands of non-experts and in the community as well as to validate training protocols.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, we are likely to see a significant increase in the requests for rapid assessment of cardiac function, due to the frequent pre-existence of cardiac pathologies in patients admitted to hospital, and to the emergence of specific cardiac manifestations of this infection, such as myocarditis, sepsis related cardiomyopathy, stress induced cardiomyopathy and acute coronary syndromes. Hand-held, point-of-care ultrasound (HH-POCUS) is particularly suited for the provision of rapid, focused, integrated assessments of the heart and lungs. We present a review of the indications and protocols for focused HH-POCUS use in an acute setting and formulate proposals for streamlining their application in the COVID-19 context towards guiding optimum management of these patients while at the same time allowing adherence to robust infection control measures to provide safety to both the patient and our clinical staff. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To explore the value of hand-held ultrasound (HHUS) for diagnosing complex cystic and solid breast lesions, 472 pathologically proven lesions were analyzed. The lesions were divided into four types based on ultrasound features. Positive predictive values (PPVs) for lesion types and risk factor performances were assessed. Furthermore, HHUS and mammography (MAM) performances were compared: 27 lesions missed in MAM were detected in HHUS. Ultrasound feature analysis revealed higher PPVs for type III and IV lesions than for type I and II lesions. In patients older than 51 y, a type III or IV lesion with a diameter greater than 18 mm, an irregular shape, a non-parallel orientation, an uncircumscribed margin, calcification, vascularity and abnormal axillary lymph nodes were suggestive of malignancy; the area under the curve reached 0.869. Thus, ultrasound is useful in diagnosing complex cystic and solid breast lesions, which should be categorized as Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 4B or 4C. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Accurately assessing volume status in acutely decompensated heart failure (ADHF) can be challenging. Inferior vena cava (IVC) dynamics by echocardiography allow indirect assessment of volume status in these patients. Recently introduced hand‐held ultrasound devices are promising. We aimed to describe the clinical correlates of volume status assessment using a hand‐held ultrasound device in ADHF. Methods: In this prospective study, we evaluated 106 patients admitted with ADHF. First scan was performed within 24 hours of admission and timed in reference to first dose of intravenous diuretic. Daily resting and inspiratory (sniff) IVC diameters were measured according to standard echocardiography methods during hospitalization including the day of discharge. IVC collapsibility index (IVC‐CI = Maximum IVC diameter‐Inspiratory IVC diameter/maximum diameter; <0.5 representing hypervolemia) was calculated. Primary study endpoint was 30‐day readmission. Research activities were independent of clinical decision‐making. Results: Data for 106 patients was analyzed. Mean age was 66.7 ± 13.8 years, of which 53.8% were females, and a mean ejection fraction was 39 ± 18%. Initial scan of the IVC was obtained at an average time of 5.2 ± 8.04 hours from first diuretic dose. 81.2% of patients at admission had an IVC‐CI <0.5. 63.2% patients had an IVC‐CI <0.5 at discharge. There were no significant differences in age, length of stay, diuretic dose, or 30‐day readmissions between patients with a discharge IVC‐CI <0.5 vs ≥ 0.5. Conclusion: Hand‐held ultrasound assessment of IVC‐CI in ADHF patients, although a feasible concept, is unable to predict 30‐day readmissions in our study. Further prospective studies are necessary. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The processing power in commercially available hand-held devices has improved dramatically in recent years. In parallel, techniques used in high-frame-rate medical ultrasound imaging, especially plane-wave (PW) imaging, have reduced the number of ultrasound transmissions and amount of data necessary to reconstruct an ultrasound image. In combination, the processing power and data reduction allow all of the processing steps in ultrasound image formation, from raw ultrasound channel data to final rendering, to be performed on a hand-held device. In this study, we send the raw ultrasound channel data from a research scanner wirelessly to an off-the-shelf hand-held device. The hand-held unit’s graphical processing unit is processing the raw ultrasound data into the final image, achieving real-time frame rates on the order of 60–90 frames per second (FPS) for a single-angle PW transmission. Higher quality images are achieved by trading off frame rate by coherently compounding multiple PW images, resulting in frame rates on the order of, e.g., 13 FPS when coherently compounding 7 PW transmissions. The presented setup has the potential of providing image quality which could be valuable for simple medical ultrasound diagnostic scans of, e.g., the carotid artery or thyroid. Also, since the computationally expensive beamforming can be done in off-the-shelf devices, this could reduce the price of hand-held ultrasound systems in the future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Symptomatic trapeziometacarpal osteoarthrosis can be treated with an ultrasound-guided injection in the early stages. This cadaveric study aimed to assess the hypothesis suggesting enhanced accuracy and reliability of hand-held ultrasound (HHUS) injections compared to blind injections into the trapeziometacarpal joint (TMC). Materials and method Our series included 20 fresh cadaveric hands, with a total of 20 TMC randomly assigned to two groups. In group A, 10 TMC received a blinded injection, and in group B, 10 TMC received an ultrasound-guided injection with HHUS. Methylene blue was injected, and anatomical dissection was performed to assess the intra-articular location of the dye. The injection was considered accurate if the intra-articular synovial fluid was stained after opening the articular capsule on the dorsal approach. If there was no injection, it was inaccurate. A statistical analysis was performed, and p <.05 indicated a significant difference. Results Two thumbs were excluded during the study due to an existing trapeziectomy. In group A, 10 blind injections of TMC were performed, with 70% (7/10) of injections graded as accurate. In group B, eight ultrasound-guided injections were performed, with 75% (6/8) achieving accuracy. A Fisher's exact test was performed, and the results indicated no statistically significant difference in injection accuracy between the two groups (P = 1, odds ratio = 0.788). Conclusion Hand-held ultrasound guided TMC injections were not more accurate than blind injections performed by an experienced hand surgeon. Nonetheless, additional studies with a larger sample and comparative studies with conventional cart-based machines are necessary to evaluate the potential of this newly accessible device., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright © 2023, Hamoudi et al.)

Objectives: To investigate the automated breast volume scanner (ABVS) in comparison with hand-held ultrasound (HHUS) according to the fifth edition of BI-RADS ultrasound.Material and Methods: A total of 831 lesions in 786 patients who underwent both HHUS and ABVS were included. Three radiologists independently evaluated the sonographic features of each lesion according to the fifth BI-RADS edition. The kappa coefficient (κ) was calculated for each BI-RADS descriptor and final assessment category. The accuracy of malignancy prediction and diagnostic performance of the BI-RADS descriptors were assessed using multivariate logistic regression and area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC), respectively.Results: ABVS and HHUS showed moderate to good interobserver agreement (κ = 0.53-0.67 and 0.55-0.70, respectively) except in associated features (κ = 0.31 and 0.36, respectively) for BI-RADS lexicons. Irregular shape, a non-circumscribed margin, and posterior features (combined or shadowing) were independently associated with malignancy in both ABVS and HHUS. Calcification presence on ABVS (odds ratio [OR], 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.09, 1.11-3.94) and non-parallel orientation on HHUS (OR, 95% CI: 2.04, 1.10-3.78) were independently associated with malignancy. There were no significant differences between ABVS and HHUS in sensitivity (84.2% vs. 84.2%), specificity (80.5% vs. 83.9%), or AUC (0.88 vs. 0.90).Conclusions: According to the fifth BI-RADS edition, ABVS is not statistically significantly different from HHUS with regard to interobserver variability and diagnostic performance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound imaging devices are becoming popular in clinical and teaching settings, but there is no systematic information on their use in medical education. We conducted a systematic review of hand-held ultrasound (HHU) devices in undergraduate medical education to delineate their role, significance, and limitations. METHODS: We searched Cochrane, PubMed, Embase, and Medline using the strategy: [(Hand-held OR Portable OR Pocket OR "Point of Care Systems") AND Ultrasound] AND (Education OR Training OR Undergraduate OR "Medical Students" OR "Medical School"). We retained 12 articles focusing on undergraduate medical education. We summarised the patterns of HHU use, pooled and estimated sensitivity, and specificity of HHU for detection of left ventricular dysfunction. RESULTS: Features reported were heterogeneous: training time (1-25 hours), number of students involved (1-an entire cohort), number of subjects scanned (27-211), and type of learning (self-directed vs. traditional lectures + hands-on sessions). Most studies reported cardiac HHU examinations, but other anatomical areas were examined, e.g. abdomen and thyroid. Pooled sensitivity 0.88 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.83-0.92] and specificity 0.86 (95% CI 0.81-0.90) were high for the detection of left ventricular systolic dysfunction by students. CONCLUSION: Data on HHU devices in medical education are scarce and incomplete, but following training students can achieve high diagnostic accuracy, albeit in a limited number of (mainly cardiac) pathologies. There is no consensus on protocols best-suited to the educational needs of medical students, nor data on long-term impact, decay in proficiency or on the financial implications of deploying HHU in this setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Breast ultrasound could be a valuable tool complementary to mammography in breast cancer screening. Automated 3D breast ultrasound (ABUS) addresses challenges of hand-held ultrasound and could allow double reading analysis of ultrasound images. This trial assesses the inter-rater reliability and double reading analysis of an ABUS system.Methods: To assess the reproducibility and diagnostic validity of the ABUS system, SomoV™, a blinded double reading analysis, was performed in 1019 patients (2038 breasts) by two examiners (examiner A/B) and compared to single reading results, as well as to the reference standard regarding its diagnostic validity. Cohen's kappa coefficients were calculated to measure the inter-rater reliability and agreement of the different diagnostic modalities. Patient comfort and time consumption for image acquisition and reading were analyzed descriptively as secondary objectives.Results: Analysis of inter-rater reliability yielded agreement in 81.6% (κ = 0.37; p < 0.0001) showing fair agreement. Single reading analysis of SomoV™ exams (examiner A/examiner B) compared to reference standard showed good specificity (examiner A: 88.3%/examiner B: 84.5%), fair inter-rater agreement (examiner A: κ = 0.31/examiner B: κ = 0.31), and adequate sensitivity (examiner A: 53.1%/examiner B: 64.2%). Double reading analysis yielded good sensitivity and specificity (73.7 and 77.7%). Mammography (n = 1911) alone detected 160 of 176 carcinomas (sensitivity 90.1%). Adding SomoV™ to mammography would have detected 12 additional carcinomas, resulting in a higher sensitivity of 97.7%.Conclusion: SomoV™ is a promising technique with good sensitivity, high patient comfort, and fair inter-examiner reliability. It allows double reading analysis that, in combination with mammography, could increase detection rates in breast cancer screening. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The incidence of breast cancer is increasing worldwide, reinforcing the importance of breast screening. Conventional hand-held ultrasound (HHUS) for breast screening is efficient and relatively easy to perform; however, it lacks systematic recording and localization. This study investigated an electromagnetic tracking-based whole-breast ultrasound (WBUS) system to facilitate the use of HHUS for breast screening. One-hundred nine breast masses were collected, and the detection of suspicious breast lesions was compared between the WBUS system, HHUS and a commercial automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) system. The positioning error between WBUS and ABUS (1.39 ± 0.68 cm) was significantly smaller than that between HHUS and ABUS (1.62 ± 0.91 cm, p = 0.014) and HHUS and WBUS (1.63 ± 0.9 cm, p = 0.024). WBUS is a practical clinical tool for breast screening that can be used instead of the often unavailable and costly ABUS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Hand-held ultrasound (HHUS) is gaining popularity among clinicians. Although its use for procedural guidance could have several advantages in hand surgery, other surgeons may wonder about its added benefits. This cadaveric study aimed to examine the hypothesis of increased accuracy of wireless HHUS-guided injections versus that of blind injections into the flexor sheath., Methods: Our series included 20 fresh cadaveric hands with 80 fingers randomly assigned to 2 groups. In group A, 10 hands were randomly assigned to receive a landmark injection and then received a blinded injection to the flexor tendon sheath (FTS). In group B, 10 hands were blinded in the same manner and received an ultrasound-guided injection with HHUS. Methylene blue was injected, and anatomic dissection was performed to evaluate the injection accuracy based on the dye's filling pattern in the FTS as stage I (no filling), stage II (<50% filling), and stage III (>50% filling). Statistical analysis was performed, and P <.05 indicated a significant difference., Results: One finger was excluded because of severe Dupuytren contracture. In group A, 39 blind injections of the FTS were performed, with 82% (32/39) fingers achieving stage III filling. In group B, 40 ultrasound-guided FTS injections were performed, with 90% (36/40) of fingers achieving stage III filing. Our study did not reveal any superiority in accuracy when ultrasound guidance was used ( P  = .35)., Conclusions: Hand-held ultrasound-guided FTS injections were not more accurate than blind injections performed by an experienced hand surgeon. These findings suggest that blind injections can be used as routine practice when performed by experienced operators to treat trigger finger. However, the use of HHUS may offer other advantages in hand surgery practice., Clinical Relevance: Ultimately, choosing to perform HHUS-guided injection versus blind injection to treat trigger finger depends on the surgeon's experience and preference for a particular technique., (© 2023 The Authors.)

Rationale and Objectives To assess how well radiologists visualize relevant features of lesions seen with automated breast volumetric scanning (ABVS) in comparison to hand-held breast ultrasound in women going to breast biopsy. Materials and Methods Twenty-five subjects were recruited from women who were scheduled to undergo a breast biopsy for at least one Breast Imaging–Reporting and Data System four or five lesion identified in a diagnostic setting. In this institutional review board–approved study, the subjects underwent imaging of the breast(s) of concern using a dedicated system that allowed both hand-held breast ultrasound and ABVS. Five experienced breast radiologists reviewed the 30 lesions in 25 subjects in a reader study. Each reader was asked to specify the lesion type, size, imaging features, Breast Imaging–Reporting and Data System, and suspicion of malignancy and to compare the lesion characteristics of shape and margins between the two modalities. Results Seven (23.3%) masses were malignant and 23 (76.4%) were benign. Across all lesions regardless of size or final pathology, there was no significant difference in sensitivity or specificity ( P > .15) between the two modalities. For malignant lesions, the reader visualization confidence scores between the two ultrasound modalities were not significantly different ( P > .1). However, analysis for nonmalignant cases showed a statistically significant increase in reader visualization confidence in lesion shape and margins ( P < .001). Conclusions Radiologists showed increased confidence in visualization of benign masses and equal confidence in suspicious masses with ABVS imaging. This information could help decrease the need for additional hand-held imaging after automated whole breast ultrasound. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The optimum management of acute medical patients requires prompt and accurate diagnosis, monitoring and treatment. The clinical history and physical examination remain central to diagnosis, but often need supplementation by laboratory testing or imaging. Echocardiographic assessment of cardiac structure and function provides valuable information that can aid diagnosis and assess clinical progress. It has many advantages as an imaging modality, and recent technological advances have resulted in hand-held, battery-powered ultrasound devices that provide high-quality images. Three broad applications of cardiac ultrasound now exist: conventional echocardiography, focussed echocardiography and the quick-scan. A quick-scan using a hand-held ultrasound device is readily integrated into the bedside clinical assessment, providing information that can be used immediately in diagnostic reasoning; it can also guide pericardiocentesis. Hand-held ultrasound devices can also be used in acute situations, as well as geographically remote areas or special situations (eg disaster zones) where other imaging is not available. However, the diagnostic yield of echocardiography is user dependent, and training is required for its benefi ts to be realised, adding to the hardware costs. More data are needed on the incremental value of hand-held ultrasonography and a quick-scan over conventional methods of assessment, their impact on clinical outcomes, and cost effectiveness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Purpose: The purpose of this work was to validate a new clinical obstetrics and gynecology (OB-GYN) application for a hand-held ultrasound (US) device. We modified the smallest hand-held device on the market and tested the system for transvaginal (TV) use. This device was originally conceived for abdominal scanning only. Methods: The validation involved 80 successive patients examined by the same operator: 25 obstetric and 55 gynecologic cases. US examination was performed transvaginally with two US systems: the hand-held Vscan (General Electrics; GE Vingmed Ultrasound; Norway) for which an intravaginal gadget TTGP-2010® (Troyano transvaginal gadget probe) was designed, and the Voluson 730 Expert (multifrequency transvaginal ultrasound of 3–9MHz; GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA). We performed the same measurements with both US systems in order to confirm whether or not their diagnostic capability was similar. Quantitative difference in measurements between the systems was assessed, as well as the overall diagnostic detection rate and suitability for telemedicine. Results: Regarding lesion visibility with Vscan, optimal distance was 8–16cm depending on the examination type, and the total detection rate was 98.7%. The exception was an ovarian endometrioma, diagnosed as a follicular cyst using the hand-held device. Assessment of reproducibility in 180 measurements showed that the measurements obtained with Vscan were 0.3–0.4cm lower than those obtained with the high resolution US device (Voluson 730 Expert). Nevertheless, Pearson’s correlation coefficient was high for biparietal diameter (0.72) and gynecological (GYN) (0.99) measurements, and for overall correlation (0.997). Image transport on USB and SD-flash cards proved convenient for telemedicine. Conclusions: A novel TV application of a hand-held US device is demonstrated for OB-GYN. Heart, abdominal and obstetrics presets of the Vscan together with color-Doppler enable a detection capability comparable to that of a high-definition US device. The lower values of the measurements obtained by the hand-held device (by 0.3–0.4cm) must be taken into account, although they have no effect on its diagnostic capability. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

The coronavirus pandemic abruptly halted all in-person clerkships, or clinical rotations, for clinical veterinary students across the United States. Online clerkships in radiology offered the opportunity to expand the student's ability to interpret medical images but did not allow for the development of physical hands-on imaging skills recognized as core competencies in veterinary medicine. The present report highlights the value of providing veterinary students with a smartphone-associated Butterfly iQ point-of-care ultrasound during a 3-week self-driven virtual clerkship. During the virtual rotation, the student was able to develop the skills required to generate sufficient quality images using three horses residing on her property. The affordability, portability, ease of use of the Butterfly iQ and availability of animals made it possible to develop hands-on imaging skills when distance learning was required.

Background: The purpose of this study was to assess the repeatability and limits of agreement of corneal thickness values measured by a high-frequency ultrasound (Artemis-2), hand-held ultrasound pachymeter (DGH-500) and a specular microscope (SP-3000P). Methods: Central corneal thickness (CCT) was analyzed in this prospective randomized study that included 32 patients (18 men and 14 women) aged 21-24 years. Measurements were obtained in two sessions, one week apart, by two examiners with three devices in a randomized order. Nine measurements were taken (three with each device) on one randomly selected eye of each patient in each measurement session. The coefficient of repeatability and interobserver reproducibility for the values of each method were calculated. The limits of agreement between techniques were also evaluated. Results: There were no significant differences in CCT values between sessions for each of the three devices (P > 0.05). The repeatability coefficients for the Artemis-2 (±8 μm/±9 μm) were superior to those of the SP-3000P (±9 μm/±11 μm) and DGH 500 (±12 μm/±12 μm) in session 1/session 2 respectively, while the interobserver reproducibility index (differences between session 1 and session 2) was superior for the SP-3000P (±17 μm) with respect to DHG-500 (±29 μm) and the Artemis-2 (±31 μm). In session 1 and session 2, the limits of agreement between the techniques were 35 μm to -31 μm and 34 to -20 μm, respectively, for DGH-500 versus Artemis-2, 73 μm to 3 μm and 60 μm to 9 μm for Artemis-2 versus SP-3000P, and 58 μm to 22 μm and 72 μm to 10 μm for DGH-500 versus SP-3000P comparisons. The DGH-500 and Artemis-2 gave similar values (P > 0.05) in both sessions, but both (Artemis-2 and DGH-500) values were significantly greater than that of the SP-3000P (P < 0.05) in both sessions. Conclusion: Repeatability was comparably good for the three techniques. However, interobserver reproducibility was approximately twice as good with the SP-3000P compared with the other two devices. The Artemis-2 CCT values consistently agreed with the DGH-500 and less so with the SP-3000P. The Artemis-2 provided CCT values that were, on average, 38 μm and 34 μm greater than that of the SP-3000P in session 1 and session 2, respectively. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Objectives: To retrospectively evaluate the detection performance of benign and malignant breast masses using 3D volume data obtained by ABUS and to determine lesion variables which affect detectability. Methods: Between November and December of 2007, bilateral whole breast US images were obtained using ABUS in 67 consecutive women who were scheduled to undergo US-guided needle biopsy due to suspicious breast masses. Twenty-four invasive ductal cancers in 23 breasts, 46 benign breast lesions in 44 breasts and 38 normal breasts were included. Three breast radiologists (experience range, 8–16 years) who did not perform the examinations and were blinded to the histology independently reviewed the ABUS data of the 105 breasts to detect suspicious solid masses with pathology as the standard of reference. Sensitivity and specificity in detecting benign and malignant masses were calculated, and lesion characteristics affecting detectability were analyzed. Results: Sensitivities for benign and malignant mass detections were 65.2% (30/46), 95.8% (23/24) for reader 1 (p =0.007), 66.7% (31/46), 87.5% (21/24) for reader 2 (p =0.087), and 56.3% (24/46), 91.7% (22/24), for reader 3 (p =0.001), respectively. Logistic analysis showed that mass size (odds ratio, 95% CI; 1.12, 1.02–1.24), surrounding tissue changes (odds ratio, 95% CI; 0.11, 0.02–0.47), and shape of the mass (odds ratio, 95% CI; 3.12, 1.02–9.55) were the variables associated with detectability at ABUS. Conclusion: In reader studies using ABUS data, significantly higher sensitivity was noted for malignant breast masses than for benign masses. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background and Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility and clinical influence of carotid artery examinations in patients admitted with stroke or TIA with hand-held ultrasound by experts, to identify individuals not in need of further carotid artery diagnostics.Materials and Methods: Cardiologists experienced in carotid ultrasound examined 80 patients admitted to a stroke unit with suspected stroke or TIA with hand-held ultrasound devices (HUD). Grey scale and color Doppler images were stored using a GE Vscan with dual probe (phased array and linear transducer). High-end triplex ultrasound performed by a cardiologist, blinded to the details of the HUD study, was performed in all patients and used as reference. Computer tomography angiography was performed when clinically indicated.Results: Stroke or TIA was diagnosed in 62 (78%) patients. Age was median (range) 72 (23-93) years. A significant stenosis (> 50% diameter reduction) was ruled out in 61 (76%) of patients by the HUD examinations. Sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing a significant stenosis was 92% and 93%, respectively. One of 12 significant stenoses was missed by HUD. All four patients in need of surgery were identified by the HUD examination. Sensitivity and specificity to identify a significant stenosis by HUD was 87% and 83%, respectively, compared to CT angiography.Conclusion: HUD examinations of the carotid arteries by experts, using hand-held ultrasound devices, were feasible and may reduce the need for high-end diagnostic imaging of the carotid vessels in patients with stroke and TIA. Thus, HUD may improve diagnostic workflow in stroke units in the future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

It has been well established that X‐ray modality when combined with ultrasound modality increases sensitivity and specificity of breast lesion detections. Under the NIH grant, Fischer has developed a fused full‐field digital mammography and ultrasound system (FFDMUS), which has ability to acquire 2‐D X‐ray mammogram and 3‐D ultrasound images simultaneously. This novel technology generates co‐registered breast images of X‐ray and ultrasound images. The co‐registration error between X‐ray and ultrasound images acquired is within 2.00 mm in scan direction, and is 0.5 mm in anterior‐posterior direction. We did the performance evaluation of the system, and concluded that the ultrasound image qualities from FFDMUS and Hand‐held ultrasound (HHUS) are comparable, and the X‐ray image qualities from FFDMUS and SenoScan® are also comparable. We also developed a preliminary CAD registration and segmentation system for FFDMUS datasets. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ultrasound has been accepted as an important initial screening tool for diagnosing severely traumatized patients. The discovery of free fluid in the abdomen and chest can lead to appropriate and timely definitive care. Mass trauma in disasters may occur in remote places where routine radiological diagnostic tools are not available. The portability, small size, light weight, improved quality and low price are advantages of the new hand-held portable ultrasound machines. Focused Assessment Sonography for Trauma (FAST) can be used as a quick adjuvant method for triaging patients. It accurately, and rapidly provides objective information on injured victims, which ultimately aids in assessment, triage and allocation of resources. Furthermore, it can be repeated during transportation. Satellite and mobile wireless transmission of FAST has also been tested using hand-held units. Interpretation of these images was correct in more than 90% of the studied cases. These new developments in technology have a tremendous potential in disaster situations, allowing accurate field triage and direction of patient care, in even the most austere of environments. Ultrasound use can be maximized with adequate training, experience, and appreciation of its technical limitations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The present study aimed to evaluate the students’ progress in evaluating ultrasound (US) and cadaveric cardiac images and long-time retention of information. First-year medical students were invited to participate in four two-hour online lectures during one week voluntarily. The students were trained to recognize cardiovascular anatomical structures on US and cadaveric images during the intervention. The participants’ abilities to identify specific anatomical structures were tested before, immediately after and six months after the training. A group of second-year students without US training participated as a control group and filled the same test once. Ninety-one first-year students agreed to participate, and forty-nine completed all three tests. The performances in the correct identification of cardiovascular structures on the US images significantly improved after the training but significantly decreased after six months. In the intervention group, the accurate identification of cardiovascular structures was significantly higher on cadaveric images (80% vs. 53%, p-value < 0.0001, n = 91 at post-training; 70% vs. 33%, p-value < 0.0001, n = 49 at 6 months after training). The correct answers percentage score in the control group varied from 6.7% to 66.7% for US cardiovascular anatomical without a significant difference than the intervention group (p-value = 0.7651). First-year students’ knowledge of heart US anatomy proved less effective than cadaveric images, significantly improved after training and decreased over time, indicating the need for repetition reinforcement.

Background & Objectives: Breast cancer being one of the most common malignant tumours among women, diagnostic modalities for early detection of the same become of paramount importance. In this context, the hand-held ultrasound (HHUS) and automated breast volume scanner (ABVS) could provide valuable information for clinicians to diagnose breast diseases. This study aimed to compare and evaluate the diagnostic performance of combined use of HHUS and ABVS for the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions., Methods: A total of 361 female patients, who underwent both HHUS and ABVS examinations were included in this study. ABVS and HHUS images were interpreted using the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS). The distributions of the BI-RADS categories and pathology results were shown as specific numbers. Kappa coefficients test (κ) was calculated to compare the diagnostic results amongst the ABVS, HHUS and ABVS combined with HHUS. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of the three diagnostic methods were calculated and their respective diagnostic performance was analyzed by receiver operator characteristic curve., Results: Of a total of 431 lesions, 153 (35.5%) were malignant and 278 (64.5%) were benign. With respect to the pathology results, the value of κ was 0.713 (P<0.001) for HHUS, κ=0.765 (P<0.001) for ABVS and κ=0.815 (P<0.001) for HHUS+ABVS. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV and NPV for HHUS combined with ABVS were 96.08 (147/153), 88.49 (246/278), 91.18 (393/431), 82.12 (147/179) and 97.62 per cent (246/252) respectively. For HHUS, these were 90.20 (138/153), 84.17 (234/278), 86.31 (372/431), 75.82 (138/182) and 93.98 per cent (234/249) respectively; and for ABVS these were 92.16 (141/153), 87.05 (242/278), 88.86 (383/431), 79.66 (141/177) and 95.28 per cent (242/254), respectively. There was no significant difference amongst these three methods, but the diagnostic performance of HHUS combined with ABVS was better than, or at least equal to, that of HHUS or ABVS alone., Interpretation & Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that ABVS is a promising and advantageous modality for breast cancer detection. Furthermore, the combination of HHUS and ABVS showed a more comparable diagnostic performance than HHUS or ABVS alone for distinguishing between benign and malignant breast lesions.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability of automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) examinations of suspicious breast masses in comparison to handheld breast ultrasound (HHUS) with regard to Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category assessment, and to investigate the factors affecting discrepancies in categorization., Methods: A total of 135 masses that were assessed as BI-RADS categories 4 and 5 on ABUS that underwent ultrasound (US)-guided core needle biopsy from May 2017 to December 2017 were included in this study. The BI-RADS categories were re-assessed using HHUS. Agreement of the BI-RADS categories was evaluated using kappa statistics, and the positive predictive value of each examination was calculated. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the mammography and US findings associated with discrepancies in the BI-RADS categorization., Results: The overall agreement between ABUS and HHUS in all cases was good (79.3%, kappa=0.61, P<0.001). Logistic regression analysis revealed that accompanying suspicious microcalcifications on mammography (odds ratio [OR], 4.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.83 to 11.71; P=0.001) and an irregular shape on US (OR, 5.59; 95% CI, 1.43 to 21.83; P=0.013) were associated with discrepancies in the BI-RADS categorization., Conclusion: The agreement between ABUS and HHUS examinations in the BI-RADS categorization of suspicious breast masses was good. The presence of suspicious microcalcifications on mammography and an irregular shape on US were factors associated with ABUS yielding a lower level of suspicion than HHUS in terms of the BI-RADS category assessment.

This article was migrated. The article was marked as recommended. Background: As ultrasound offers students an opportunity to study anatomy, physiology and pathophysiology actively, we used hand-held ultrasound (HHU) devices to augment current teaching of cardiac murmurs and pathology. Methods : Three types of teaching sessions (of different duration) were explored: 1) compulsory teaching on cardiac murmurs (n=40); 2) extra-curricular teaching of cardiac murmurs (n=8); 3) extra-curricular ultrasound course (n=6). We assessed students' ability to identify valvular lesions on auscultation, and anatomy and pathology on echocardiography, and sought qualitative feedback. Results: Using echocardiography to teach murmurs improved murmur recognition by auscultation alone from 23% pre-test to 93% post-test (p=0.017). Students were able to identify major cardiac anatomical landmarks on echo images (57% vs 98% ( p =0.027) in the voluntary teaching session lasting 90 minutes, and 40% vs 82% ( p =0.027) after the 3 week cardiac ultrasound course. The mean accuracy for diagnosing cardiac pathology on a printed image alone after the 3 week ultrasound course was 71%. Students unanimously found the sessions useful and engaging, and reported they would like further teaching about using ultrasound. Conclusion: Medical students found the sessions engaging, enjoyed this novel way of teaching and would like further teaching using ultrasound. Using hand-held ultrasound scanners to augment the teaching of cardiac murmurs to medical students is feasible and effective., (Copyright: © 2018 Galusko V et al.)

Background: Automated breast ultrasonography (ABUS) has the potential to be an important adjunct to mammography in women with dense breasts., Purpose: To compare reader performance and inter-observer variation of ABUS alone and in combination with mammography., Material and Methods: This retrospective study had ethical committee approval. All women gave written informed consent. One hundred and fourteen breasts in 90 women examined by digital mammography and ABUS were interpreted by five radiologists using BI-RADS categories. The 114 breasts included 38 cancers and 76 normal or benign findings. In the first reading session ABUS only was interpreted, and in the second ABUS plus digital mammography. Image interpretations were done without knowledge of clinical or imaging results. A consensus panel analyzed false negative and false positive interpretations. Reading time was recorded for one radiologist. AUC was used for performance measurement, and kappa statistic for inter-observer variability., Results: Mean size for cancers was 16.2 mm; area under the curve (AUC) values for ABUS alone and for combined reading were, respectively: reader A, 0.592-0.744; reader B, 0.740-0.947; reader, C 0.759-0.823; reader D, 0.670-0.688; reader E, 0.904-0.923; and all readers combined 0.730-0.823. The higher AUC for combined reading was statistically significant (P < 0.05) for reader B and for all readers. There was a considerable inter-observer variability. Observer agreement revealed following kappa values for ABUS alone and combined reading, respectively: reader A, 0.22-0.30; reader B, 0.33-0.44; reader C, 0.32-0.39; reader D, 0.07-0.14; and reader E, 0.34-0.43. Shadowing from dense parenchyma was the most common cause of false positive ABUS interpretations. Mean interpretation time for a bilateral normal ABUS examination was 9 min., Conclusion: Observer agreement was higher and all radiologists improved diagnostic performance using combined ABUS and mammography interpretation. Combined reading should be standard if ABUS is implemented in screening of women with dense breasts., (© The Foundation Acta Radiologica 2014 Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav.)

The optimum management of acute medical patients requires prompt and accurate diagnosis, monitoring and treatment. The clinical history and physical examination remain central to diagnosis, but often need supplementation by laboratory testing or imaging. Echocardiographic assessment of cardiac structure and function provides valuable information that can aid diagnosis and assess clinical progress. It has many advantages as an imaging modality, and recent technological advances have resulted in hand-held, battery-powered ultrasound devices that provide high-quality images. Three broad applications of cardiac ultrasound now exist: conventional echocardiography, focussed echocardiography and the quick-scan. A quick-scan using a hand-held ultrasound device is readily integrated into the bedside clinical assessment, providing information that can be used immediately in diagnostic reasoning; it can also guide pericardiocentesis. Hand-held ultrasound devices can also be used in acute situations, as well as geographically remote areas or special situations (eg disaster zones) where other imaging is not available. However, the diagnostic yield of echocardiography is user dependent, and training is required for its benefits to be realised, adding to the hardware costs. More data are needed on the incremental value of hand-held ultrasonography and a quick-scan over conventional methods of assessment, their impact on clinical outcomes, and cost effectiveness., (© 2014 Royal College of Physicians.)