Search

Abstract Background The main barriers keeping individuals with high-risk of angle closure from seeking eye-care service are the absence of both disease awareness and convenient and low-cost access to the ocular health care system. Present study described the efficacy of a health examination center-based screening model designed to detect eyes with high risk of angle closure (HRAC) among healthy individuals using anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT). Methods From March 1 to April 30, 2017, consecutive individuals aged ≥ 40 years undergoing routine physical examinations at a health examination center were invited to enroll. Presenting visual acuity (PVA), intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement, non-mydriatic fundus photography and AS-OCT were performed by three trained nurses. Participants with PVA

Background: The main barriers keeping individuals with high-risk of angle closure from seeking eye-care service are the absence of both disease awareness and convenient and low-cost access to the ocular health care system. Present study described the efficacy of a health examination center-based screening model designed to detect eyes with high risk of angle closure (HRAC) among healthy individuals using anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT). Methods: From March 1 to April 30, 2017, consecutive individuals aged ≥ 40 years undergoing routine physical examinations at a health examination center were invited to enroll. Presenting visual acuity (PVA), intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement, non-mydriatic fundus photography and AS-OCT were performed by three trained nurses. Participants with PVA < 6/12 in the better-seeing eye, IOP ≥ 24 mmHg, or abnormal fundus photography in either eye were referred to the outpatient clinic, but not included in the analysis. Eyes with HRAC were defined as having trabecular-iris angle < 12 degrees in ≥ 3 quadrants. Configuration of the iris was classified into flat, bowing, bombe, thick peripheral iris and mixed mechanism. Results: Altogether, 991 participants (77.3%) with readable OCT images (mean age 55.5 ± 9.0 years; 58.4% men) were included. HRAC was diagnosed in 78 eyes (7.9%, 61.3 ± 8.2 years, 41.0% men). The prevalence of HRAC increased with age (p < 0.001) and was much higher among women (11.2%) than men (5.5%) (p = 0.001). The mixed mechanism iris configuration was most common among eyes with HRAC (37/78, 47.4%). Conclusion: HRAC is prevalent among asymptomatic Chinese adults undergoing routine health screening. Health examination center-based eye screening with AS-OCT administered by non-specialists may be a good model to screen narrow angles in the population at large. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

“Health examinations” means medical examinations conducted by health examination institutions, including a physical examination, consultation, physical measurement, diagnostic laboratory test (also known as clinical laboratory test, clinical pathology test), pathology test, and Imaging test for checking the health condition and the prevention and early detection of diseases. The types of health examinations include general health examinations, comprehensive health examinations, special health examinations, and other health examinations. The proportion of the general health examination work of medical technologists working at health examination centers has been estimated to comprise more than 50% of the total work. The cost aspect of suspicious diseases can be estimated to be more than 25%. The cost of diagnostic laboratory test has been estimated to be approximately 5%, and the proportion of medical diagnosis use is 70%. The results show that it is time to revisit whether medical technologists are receiving appropriate social, economic, and reasonable policy treatment in health examination work. The future of medical technologists will further expand their professionalism in diagnostic laboratory test and quality control in precision medicine and telemedicine in the future. Therefore, medical technologists will need to participate proactively in government policy decisions related to national health examinations and make efforts to improve treatment.

Purpose: To assess the potential of a health examination center-based screening model in improving service for uncorrected refractive error.Methods: Individuals aged ≥18 years undergoing the routine physical examinations at a tertiary hospital in the northeast China were invited. Presenting visual acuity, noncycloplegic autorefraction, noncontact tonometry, fundus photography, and slit-lamp examination were performed. Refractive error was defined as having spherical equivalent ≤ -0.75 D or ≥ +1 D and uncorrected refractive error was considered as refractive error combined with presenting visual acuity < 6/12 in the better eye. Costs for the screening were assessed.Results: A total of 5,284 participants (61 ± 14 years) were included. The overall prevalence of myopia and hyperopia was 38.7% (95% CI, 37.4–40.0%) and 23.5% (95% CI, 22.3–24.6%), respectively. The prevalence of uncorrected refractive error was 7.85% (95% CI, 7.13–8.58%). Women (p < 0.001 and p = 0.003), those with age ≥ 70 years (p < 0.001 and p = 0.003), and myopia (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001) were at higher risk of uncorrected refractive error and uncorrected refractive error-related visual impairment. Spectacle coverage rate was 70.6% (95% CI, 68.2–73.0%). The cost to identify a single case of refractive error and uncorrected refractive error was US$3.2 and US$25.2, respectively.Conclusion: The prevalence of uncorrected refractive error is high in the urban Chinese adults. Health examination center-based refractive error screening is able to provide an efficient and low-cost model to improve the refractive services in China.

Objective: To investigate the effect of management measures based on the "1+X" model in physical examination centers., Methods: This retrospective study was conducted on 5362 individuals who underwent physical examinations in Heping Hospital Affiliated to Changzhi Medical College from January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2022. These subjects were divided into an observation group (n=2681) and a control group (n=2681) according to the different management measures. Subjects from the control group were given routine management measures, while those from the observation group were given management measures based on the "1+X" model. The scores of negative emotions, waiting time for physical examination, acquisition of health knowledge, satisfaction for the physical examinations, and efficiency and degree of credibility in medical management were evaluated and compared between the two groups., Results: After management, the scores of anxiety and depression in both groups were significantly reduced in contrast to before management, and the two scores were significantly lower in the observation group than those in the control group (P<0.05). The observation group experienced significantly shorter waiting time for routine urination, blood sampling, internal and surgical examinations, and electrocardiogram than the control group (all P<0.001). The acquisition of health knowledge in the observation group was significantly better than that in the control group (P<0.05). The satisfaction rates of the observation group in the terms of service attitude, examination environment, health education, and follow-up services were significantly better than those in the control group (all P<0.05). Moreover, the efficiency and degree of credibility in medical management in the observation group were better than those in the control group., Conclusion: The application of management measures based on the "1+X" model has a good effect in our physical examination center. On the one hand, it can significantly reduce the waiting time for various physical examinations and alleviate the negative emotions of physical examinees. On the other hand, it can effectively enhance the overall acquisition of health knowledge, the satisfaction of physical examination, and the efficiency and degree of credibility in medical management. This management model is worthy of clinical promotion and application., Competing Interests: None., (AJTR Copyright © 2023.)