Search

The brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) based on steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP) have been extensively explored due to their advantages in terms of high communication speed and smaller calibration time. The visual stimuli in the low- and medium-frequency ranges are adopted in most of the existing studies for eliciting SSVEPs. However, there is a need to further improve the comfort of these systems. The high-frequency visual stimuli have been used to build BCI systems and are generally considered to significantly improve the visual comfort, but their performance is relatively low. The distinguishability of 16-class SSVEPs encoded by the three frequency ranges, i.e., 31-34.75 Hz with an interval of 0.25 Hz, 31-38.5 Hz with an interval of 0.5 Hz, 31-46 Hz with an interval of 1 Hz, is explored in this study. We compare classification accuracy and information transfer rate (ITR) of the corresponding BCI system. According to the optimized frequency range, this study builds an online 16-target high frequency SSVEP-BCI and verifies the feasibility of the proposed system based on 21 healthy subjects. The BCI based on visual stimuli with the narrowest frequency range, i.e., 31-34.5 Hz, have the highest ITR. Therefore, the narrowest frequency range is adopted to build an online BCI system. An averaged ITR obtained from the online experiment is 153.79 ±6.39 bits/min. These findings contribute to the development of more efficient and comfortable SSVEP-based BCIs.

The brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) based on steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP) have been extensively explored due to their advantages in terms of high communication speed and smaller calibration time. The visual stimuli in the low- and medium-frequency ranges are adopted in most of the existing studies for eliciting SSVEPs. However, there is a need to further improve the comfort of these systems. The high-frequency visual stimuli have been used to build BCI systems and are generally considered to significantly improve the visual comfort, but their performance is relatively low. The distinguishability of 16-class SSVEPs encoded by the three frequency ranges, i.e., 31-34.75 Hz with an interval of 0.25 Hz, 31-38.5 Hz with an interval of 0.5 Hz, 31-46 Hz with an interval of 1 Hz, is explored in this study. We compare classification accuracy and information transfer rate (ITR) of the corresponding BCI system. According to the optimized frequency range, this study builds an online 16-target high frequency SSVEP-BCI and verifies the feasibility of the proposed system based on 21 healthy subjects. The BCI based on visual stimuli with the narrowest frequency range, i.e., 31-34.5 Hz, have the highest ITR. Therefore, the narrowest frequency range is adopted to build an online BCI system. An averaged ITR obtained from the online experiment is 153.79 ±6.39 bits/min. These findings contribute to the development of more efficient and comfortable SSVEP-based BCIs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Brain–computer interface (BCI) systems use brain activity as an input signal and enable communication without movement. This study is a successor of our previous study (BCI demographics I) and examines correlations among BCI performance, personal preferences, and different subject factors such as age or gender for two sets of steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP) stimuli: one in the medium frequency range (13, 14, 15 and 16 Hz) and another in the high-frequency range (34, 36, 38, 40 Hz). High-frequency SSVEPs (above 30 Hz) diminish user fatigue and risk of photosensitive epileptic seizures. Results showed that most people, despite having no prior BCI experience, could use the SSVEP-based Bremen-BCI system in a very noisy field setting at a fair. Results showed that demographic parameters as well as handedness, tiredness, alcohol and caffeine consumption, etc., have no significant effect on the performance of SSVEP-based BCI. Most subjects did not consider the flickering stimuli annoying, only five out of total 86 participants indicated change in fatigue during the experiment. 84 subjects performed with a mean information transfer rate of 17.24 \pm 6.99 bit/min and an accuracy of 92.26 \pm 7.82\\% with the medium frequency set, whereas only 56 subjects performed with a mean information transfer rate of 12.10 \pm 7.31 bit/min and accuracy of 89.16 \pm 9.29\\% with the high-frequency set. These and other demographic analyses may help identify the best BCI for each user. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]