Search

Abstract Background A recent Phase 2/3 study in Japanese patients showed that caplacizumab was effective in treating immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP), with a low rate of iTTP recurrence. ADAMTS13 activity is monitored weekly during caplacizumab treatment to guide discontinuation of caplacizumab and consequently avoid exacerbations or relapse. The aim of this study was to assess changes in ADAMTS13 activity/inhibitor levels during caplacizumab treatment in this patient population. Methods A post hoc analysis of the Phase 2/3 study in Japanese patients was conducted. Patients ≥ 18 years old with confirmed iTTP received 10 mg of caplacizumab daily in conjunction with therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) and immunosuppression for 30 days post-TPE. Outcomes included time to recovery of ADAMTS13 activity, ADAMTS13 activity level at treatment end, incidence of ADAMTS13 inhibitor re-elevation (ie, inhibitor boosting) during treatment, time to platelet count recovery, number of days of TPE, and safety. Outcomes according to presence of inhibitor boosting were also assessed. Results Nineteen patients had confirmed iTTP and were included in this analysis. Median (95% confidence interval) time to recovery of ADAMTS13 activity to ≥ 10%, ≥ 20%, and ≥ 60% was 14.6 (5.9–24.8), 18.5 (5.9–31.8), and 47.5 (18.5–60.9) days, respectively. Median (range) ADAMTS13 activity level at caplacizumab treatment end was 62.0% (29.0–101.0). Nine patients had ADAMTS13 inhibitor boosting. Delayed response of ADAMTS13 activity was observed in patients with inhibitor boosting. The median time to platelet count response and median number of TPE days were shorter in patients with inhibitor boosting compared with patients without inhibitor boosting. Rituximab was administered to almost all patients with inhibitor boosting (88.9%), after completion of TPE. Patients without inhibitor boosting who were treated with rituximab received it prior to completion of TPE. Only one patient experienced a recurrence, which occurred shortly after caplacizumab discontinuation due to an adverse event. Conclusions In patients with iTTP, caplacizumab with TPE and immunosuppression may reduce the risk of ADAMTS13 inhibitor boosting if rituximab is administered early in the iTTP treatment period. Early administration of rituximab in addition to caplacizumab may prevent iTTP recurrence with inhibitor boosting. Trial registration NCT04074187.

Background: A recent Phase 2/3 study in Japanese patients showed that caplacizumab was effective in treating immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP), with a low rate of iTTP recurrence. ADAMTS13 activity is monitored weekly during caplacizumab treatment to guide discontinuation of caplacizumab and consequently avoid exacerbations or relapse. The aim of this study was to assess changes in ADAMTS13 activity/inhibitor levels during caplacizumab treatment in this patient population. Methods: A post hoc analysis of the Phase 2/3 study in Japanese patients was conducted. Patients ≥ 18 years old with confirmed iTTP received 10 mg of caplacizumab daily in conjunction with therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) and immunosuppression for 30 days post-TPE. Outcomes included time to recovery of ADAMTS13 activity, ADAMTS13 activity level at treatment end, incidence of ADAMTS13 inhibitor re-elevation (ie, inhibitor boosting) during treatment, time to platelet count recovery, number of days of TPE, and safety. Outcomes according to presence of inhibitor boosting were also assessed. Results: Nineteen patients had confirmed iTTP and were included in this analysis. Median (95% confidence interval) time to recovery of ADAMTS13 activity to ≥ 10%, ≥ 20%, and ≥ 60% was 14.6 (5.9–24.8), 18.5 (5.9–31.8), and 47.5 (18.5–60.9) days, respectively. Median (range) ADAMTS13 activity level at caplacizumab treatment end was 62.0% (29.0–101.0). Nine patients had ADAMTS13 inhibitor boosting. Delayed response of ADAMTS13 activity was observed in patients with inhibitor boosting. The median time to platelet count response and median number of TPE days were shorter in patients with inhibitor boosting compared with patients without inhibitor boosting. Rituximab was administered to almost all patients with inhibitor boosting (88.9%), after completion of TPE. Patients without inhibitor boosting who were treated with rituximab received it prior to completion of TPE. Only one patient experienced a recurrence, which occurred shortly after caplacizumab discontinuation due to an adverse event. Conclusions: In patients with iTTP, caplacizumab with TPE and immunosuppression may reduce the risk of ADAMTS13 inhibitor boosting if rituximab is administered early in the iTTP treatment period. Early administration of rituximab in addition to caplacizumab may prevent iTTP recurrence with inhibitor boosting. Trial registration: NCT04074187. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis guidelines for immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP) treatment recommend concurrent therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE), immunosuppressive therapy (IST), and caplacizumab. TPE can complicate antidrug antibody (ADA) measurements by transferring pre-existing antibodies (pre-Abs) into patients via donor plasma and/or diluting treatment-emergent (TE) ADAs. Objectives: To assess the presence of ADAs in patients with iTTP who received caplacizumab. Methods: Immunogenicity data from patients with iTTP receiving caplacizumab once daily plus TPE/immunosuppressive therapy in 4 clinical trials (TITAN, HERCULES, Post-HERCULES, and a trial conducted in Japanese patients) in the clinical development program were analyzed. ADA and modified ADA assays differentiated pre-Abs from TE ADAs. A functional neutralizing antibody (NAb) assay and a neutralizing epitope characterization assay (NECA) assessed the presence of ADAs with neutralizing potential. The impact of ADAs on efficacy, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, and safety was evaluated. Results: Among 228 patients in 4 studies, prevalence of pre-Abs ranged from 17.1% (TITAN) to 56.7% (HERCULES), while TE ADA prevalence ranged from 3.1% (HERCULES) to 14.3% (Japanese study). The TE NAb-positive rate ranged from 0% (Japanese study) to 12% (Post-HERCULES) using the functional NAb assay and from 2.7% (Post- HERCULES) to 14.3% (Japanese study) using the NECA. The presence of these antibodies did not impact treatment efficacy or safety. Conclusion: A complex immunogenicity assay strategy was required to define the pre-Ab/TE ADA status of patients with iTTP treated with caplacizumab in a clinical trial setting. In addition to the wide range of pre-Abs observed, few patients had detectable TE ADAs or NAbs, neither of which affected efficacy/safety.

The cornerstone treatment for immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP) in children is a combination of therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE), corticosteroids, and rituximab. Caplacizumab is an anti-von Willebrand factor (VWF) NANOBODY molecule approved as a frontline therapy of iTTP for adults and children aged ≥12 years. Using caplacizumab in children aged

Background: Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, particularly its immune-mediated variant (iTTP), necessitates accurate diagnostic approaches for effective management. Objectives: To compare a chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA) and an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for testing ADAMTS-13 activity and detecting anti–ADAMTS-13 autoantibodies (AAbs) in patients with iTTP. Methods: This study involved 31 paired samples from 12 iTTP patients. ADAMTS-13 activity was measured using the HemosIL AcuStar (Instrumentation Laboratory, CLIA) and Technozym (Technoclone) activity assay (ELISA). The presence of AAbs was assessed using Technozym ADAMTS-13-INH assay (ELISA) and HemosIL AcuStar activity (CLIA) within a Bethesda assay following mixing with normal pool plasma. von Willebrand factor (VWF) multimers were analyzed using the HYDRASYS-2 SCAN system and the HYDRAGEL 5- or 11-VW Multimer kits (Sebia). VWF activity levels were measured with the HemosIL AcuStar VWF:GPIbR on the ACL AcuStar Analyzer (IL). Results: For ADAMTS-13 activity, a strong linear relationship and no bias between CLIA and ELISA were confirmed (slope = 1.01 [0.91, 1.11], intercept = 0.00 [−0.47, 0]). However, significant discrepancies were found in AAb detection during remission phases with ADAMTS-13 activity between 10% and 50%, with CLIA and ELISA showing significant divergence (P < .001, Cohen’s g = 0.34). Consistently, VWF multimers and activity levels exhibited significantly different values between remission samples with ADAMTS-13 activity below 50% and above 50%. In longitudinal analysis of patients with multiple iTTP relapses, positivity to CLIA appears to precede ELISA in predicting exacerbations. Conclusion: While CLIA and ELISA might be interchangeable for assessing ADAMTS-13 activity, they are not equivalent for detecting AAbs, particularly in patients in clinical remission with ADAMTS-13 activity between 10% and 50%.

Background: The therapeutic management of immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP) has recently benefited from the introduction of caplacizumab, an agent directed at the inhibition of platelet aggregation. This real-world analysis investigated the epidemiology and the demographic and clinical characteristics of iTTP patients in Italy before and after caplacizumab introduction in 2020. Methods: Hospitalized adults with iTTP were included using the administrative databases of healthcare entities covering 17 million residents. Epidemiological estimates of iTTP considered the 3-year period before and after caplacizumab introduction. After stratification by treatment with or without caplacizumab, iTTP patients were characterized for their baseline features. Results: The annual incidence before and after 2020 was estimated in the range of 4.3–5.8 cases/million and 3.6–4.6 cases/million, respectively. From 2018 to 2022, 393 patients with iTTP were included, and 42 of them were treated with caplacizumab. Caplacizumab-treated patients showed better clinical outcomes, with tendentially shorter hospital stays and lower mortality rates (no treated patients died at either 1 month or 3 months after caplacizumab treatment initiation, compared to 10.5% and 11.1% mortality rates at 1 and 3 months, respectively, of the untreated ones). Conclusions: These findings may suggest that caplacizumab advent provided clinical and survival benefits for patients with iTTP. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article explores the use of plasma cell-directed therapies, such as bortezomib and daratumumab, in the treatment of refractory immune thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP). The authors analyze case studies and discuss the effectiveness of these therapies in various clinical scenarios. They conclude that plasma cell-directed therapies hold potential as treatment options for iTTP, but more research is needed to establish optimal use and standardized protocols. The article emphasizes the importance of considering the underlying cause of iTTP when tailoring treatment. [Extracted from the article]

Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) during pregnancy is life‐threatening. We encountered two pregnant women with immune‐mediated TTP (iTTP). A 40‐year‐old primigravida woman was referred at 19 gestational weeks (GWs) owing to iTTP. She received plasma exchange (PE) and steroid therapies and delivered a live infant at 27 GWs by cesarean delivery. A 29‐year‐old primigravida woman was referred owing to intrauterine fetal death and thrombocytopenia at 20 GWs. She was diagnosed with iTTP and received PE therapy. She required additional PE and steroid therapies owing to relapse. Before her second pregnancy, she received prednisolone and hydroxychloroquine according to the therapy for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). She had induced labor at 37 GWs owing to decrease plasma level of a disintegrin‐like and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin type 1 motif 13 (ADAMTS13) activity. Close monitoring of plasma ADAMTS13 activity level and treatments for underlying SLE may prevent iTTP relapse and lead to a good prognosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP) is a rare medical emergency for which a correct and early diagnosis is essential. As a severe deficiency in A Disintegrin And Metalloproteinase with ThromboSpondin type 1 repeats, member 13 (ADAMTS13) is the underlying pathophysiology, diagnostic strategies require timely monitoring of ADAMTS13 parameters to differentiate TTP from alternative thrombotic microangiopathies (TMAs) and to guide initial patient management. Assays for conventional ADAMTS13 testing focus on the enzyme activity and presence of (inhibitory) anti-ADAMTS13 antibodies to discriminate immune-mediated TTP (iTTP) from congenital TTP and guide patient management. However, diagnosis of iTTP remains challenging when patients present borderline ADAMTS13 activity. Therefore, additional biomarkers would be helpful to support correct clinical judgment. Over the last few years, the evaluation of ADAMTS13 conformation has proven to be a valuable tool to confirm the diagnosis of acute iTTP when ADAMST13 activity is between 10 and 20%. Screening of ADAMTS13 conformation during long-term patient follow-up suggests it is a surrogate marker for undetectable antibodies. Moreover, some non-ADAMTS13 parameters gained notable interest in predicting disease outcome, proposing meticulous follow-up of iTTP patients. This review summarizes non-ADAMTS13 biomarkers for which inclusion in routine clinical testing could largely benefit differential diagnosis and follow-up of iTTP patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP) patients are not responsive to standard rituximab in approximately 10% to 15% of cases, and oral immunosuppressants showed controversial results with significant toxicity. Targeting plasma cells with bortezomib appears promising, but the available evidence is scarce and stems only from isolated reports in the precaplacizumab era., Objectives: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of bortezomib in rituximab-refractory iTTP patients., Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational multicenter study among 13 Italian iTTP treating centers, collecting data from May 2017 to May 2023 (caplacizumab was licensed in Italy in January 2020)., Results: Bortezomib was effective in 10/17 patients (59%). Eleven were treated in the acute phase (9/11 responders, 82%, allowing discontinuation of caplacizumab in 5/6 treated patients), and 7 during clinical remission (2/7 responders, 28%). Responses occurred at a median time of 30 days, but 3 patients responded after 4 months. The median duration of response was 22 months (IQR, 10-38), still ongoing in 6 patients at the time of data cutoff. Responders had fewer previous acute iTTP episodes than nonresponders (median [IQR], 1 [1,2] vs 5.5 [2-7]; P = .03). Eight subjects (47%) reported toxicities, mostly in those treated with ≥2 cycles., Conclusion: Durable responses to bortezomib were registered in about 60% of multirefractory iTTP patients with mild to moderate toxicities. The occurrence of late responses (ie, after 30 days) suggests a "watchful waiting" approach after bortezomib treatment., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interests A.A., P.A., M.C., and B.F. received honoraria for participating as a speaker at educational meetings organized by Sanofi; I.M. received honoraria for participating as a speaker at educational meetings organized by Instrumentation Laboratory and Sanofi; M.B. received conference fees from Novartis, Incyte, and AbbVie; M.N. acted as a consultant for Bayer, CSL Behring, and Novo Nordisk and received speaker fees from Bayer, Takeda, Sobi, Novo Nordisk, CSL Behring, Sanofi, Amgen, Novartis, and Grifols; F.P. has received honoraria for participating as a speaker in education meetings organized by Sanofi, Spark, and Takeda and she is member of scientific advisory boards of CSL Behring, BioMarin, Roche, Sanofi, and Sobi. The other authors do not have any conflict of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis guidelines for immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP) treatment recommend concurrent therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE), immunosuppressive therapy (IST), and caplacizumab. TPE can complicate antidrug antibody (ADA) measurements by transferring pre-existing antibodies (pre-Abs) into patients via donor plasma and/or diluting treatment-emergent (TE) ADAs., Objectives: To assess the presence of ADAs in patients with iTTP who received caplacizumab., Methods: Immunogenicity data from patients with iTTP receiving caplacizumab once daily plus TPE/immunosuppressive therapy in 4 clinical trials (TITAN, HERCULES, Post-HERCULES, and a trial conducted in Japanese patients) in the clinical development program were analyzed. ADA and modified ADA assays differentiated pre-Abs from TE ADAs. A functional neutralizing antibody (NAb) assay and a neutralizing epitope characterization assay (NECA) assessed the presence of ADAs with neutralizing potential. The impact of ADAs on efficacy, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, and safety was evaluated., Results: Among 228 patients in 4 studies, prevalence of pre-Abs ranged from 17.1% (TITAN) to 56.7% (HERCULES), while TE ADA prevalence ranged from 3.1% (HERCULES) to 14.3% (Japanese study). The TE NAb-positive rate ranged from 0% (Japanese study) to 12% (Post-HERCULES) using the functional NAb assay and from 2.7% (Post- HERCULES) to 14.3% (Japanese study) using the NECA. The presence of these antibodies did not impact treatment efficacy or safety., Conclusion: A complex immunogenicity assay strategy was required to define the pre-Ab/TE ADA status of patients with iTTP treated with caplacizumab in a clinical trial setting. In addition to the wide range of pre-Abs observed, few patients had detectable TE ADAs or NAbs, neither of which affected efficacy/safety., (© 2024 The Authors.)

Although salvage therapy with rituximab is effective in some cases of immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP) refractory to standard plasma exchange (PEX) and glucocorticoid treatment or relapsed after treatment, protocols to address the subsequent high recurrence rate have not been established. We describe the use of cyclosporine (CSA) to prevent recurrence in a patient with iTTP relapse after rituximab therapy, and present a literature review. A 24-year-old woman was diagnosed with iTTP and initially received PEX and high-dose methylprednisolone therapy. However, weekly rituximab therapy was also needed for inhibitor boosting to achieve additional immunosuppression during the initial treatment. Although the patient achieved clinical remission after weekly rituximab therapy, iTTP relapsed twice when glucocorticoids were tapered, and was treated with a triplet regimen consisting of PEX, high-dose methylprednisolone, and weekly rituximab. CSA was administered along with glucocorticoids as prophylaxis against iTTP relapse. The additional CSA therapy successfully maintained iTTP remission and allowed reduction of the corticosteroid dose. Our findings demonstrate that prophylactic CSA can potentially prevent iTTP recurrence in patients with a history of multiple relapses. Data from more cases must be accumulated to establish a useful prophylactic therapy for iTTP that is refractory even to rituximab. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Selin Kucukyurt, Ahmet Emre Eskazan Division of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Cerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, TurkeyCorrespondence: Ahmet Emre EskazanIstanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, Fatih, Istanbul, TurkeyTel +90 533 722 73 76Fax +90 212 589 79 34Email emre.eskazan@istanbul.edu.trBackground: Acquired or immune-mediated TTP (iTTP) is a life-threatening thrombotic microangiopathy, characterized by the presence of microangiopathic hemolytic anemia and severe thrombocytopenia, and a variable degree of ischemic organ damage, related to a severe deficiency of ADAMTS13, which is a serine metalloprotease necessary for cleavage of large vWF multimers. There has been a dramatic decrease in mortality rates with the recognition of the pathophysiology of iTTP over the years. Although therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) together with corticosteroids are the backbone of the upfront treatment of patients with iTTP with successful outcomes, patients may remain refractory and/or relapse following an initial response to this treatment.Methods: We performed a review regarding the pathogenesis, diagnosis, treatment strategies, monitoring, and prognosis of iTTP.Results: There are several new treatment strategies, which can be used among these patients, helping in improving outcomes of iTTP. Rituximab has been shown to be a safe and effective adjunct to TPE, especially in patients with refractory and/or relapse as well as it is increasingly used preemptively to prevent exacerbation or recurrence. Recently, caplacizumab, a nanobody targeting vWF, was approved as an addition to the current regimen of TPE and immunomodulation for patients of iTTP.Conclusion: Specific predictors of relapse in patients in remission can be relevant for an optimal patient management. Different models including ADAMTS13 biomarkers can provide a new screening strategy to identify patients who may predict outcomes and the risk of relapse, benefit from preemptive therapy prior to relapse.Keywords: immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, ADAMTS13, caplacizumab, monitorization, outcome, TTP

The cornerstone treatment for immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP) in children is a combination of therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE), corticosteroids, and rituximab. Caplacizumab is an anti-von Willebrand factor (VWF) NANOBODY molecule approved as a frontline therapy of iTTP for adults and children aged ≥12 years. Using caplacizumab in children aged <12 years remains a gray area based on recommendations but with no marketing authorization. We report the first case of a pediatric patient with iTTP successfully treated with a caplacizumab dose adjustment of 5 mg daily based on ADAMTS13 activity. We also review all published cases of iTTP in children aged <12 years treated with caplacizumab. This is a 7-year-old girl with clinical thrombotic microangiopathy, in the absence of diarrhea and kidney injury. With a French score of 2 and a PLASMIC score of 7 (high risk), the diagnosis of TTP was suspected and later confirmed by severely low ADAMTS13 activity (<5%). Immune-mediated TTP was distinguished from the congenital one due to the presence of a functional ADAMTS13 inhibitor. Daily TPE and intravenous corticosteroids were started on day 0 (D0). Rituximab was added on D4, and due to refractoriness under daily TPE, we considered off-label administration of caplacizumab from D12. A clinical answer, with a significant increase in the platelet count, was observed within 48 h. A complete ADAMTS13 recovery was reached on D62. No major adverse events were observed during the treatment. She was discharged from the hospital over 3 months ago with a platelet count still within normal ranges. In the literature, we identified a total of four case reports describing five iTTP patients aged <12 years treated with caplacizumab, with a 100% success and tolerability rate. These published data attest to the efficacy and safety of the systematic use of caplacizumab and rituximab as frontline therapy in pediatric iTTP under 12 years of age. Therefore, prospective data are needed to support commercial authorization of caplacizumab in this subpopulation. Close monitoring of ADAMTS13 activity is particularly of interest among children to limit the number of caplacizumab injections., Competing Interests: Caplacizumab treatment was financed by Sanofi. JK is a member of the advisory board of Takeda, a member of the Takeda group of companies, for the development of recombinant ADAMTS13, and of Ablynx, now part of Sanofi for the development of caplacizumab, and has received lecture fees from Takeda and Sanofi. All honoraria are paid to her employer, Insel Gruppe AG, Bern, Switzerland. PC is a member of Sanofi's advisory board and has received honoraria for participating in symposia. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (© 2024 Chavaz, Cimasoni, Kremer Hovinga, Coppo and Ansari.)

Background: Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, particularly its immune-mediated variant (iTTP), necessitates accurate diagnostic approaches for effective management., Objectives: To compare a chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA) and an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for testing ADAMTS-13 activity and detecting anti-ADAMTS-13 autoantibodies (AAbs) in patients with iTTP., Methods: This study involved 31 paired samples from 12 iTTP patients. ADAMTS-13 activity was measured using the HemosIL AcuStar (Instrumentation Laboratory, CLIA) and Technozym (Technoclone) activity assay (ELISA). The presence of AAbs was assessed using Technozym ADAMTS-13-INH assay (ELISA) and HemosIL AcuStar activity (CLIA) within a Bethesda assay following mixing with normal pool plasma. von Willebrand factor (VWF) multimers were analyzed using the HYDRASYS-2 SCAN system and the HYDRAGEL 5- or 11-VW Multimer kits (Sebia). VWF activity levels were measured with the HemosIL AcuStar VWF:GPIbR on the ACL AcuStar Analyzer (IL)., Results: For ADAMTS-13 activity, a strong linear relationship and no bias between CLIA and ELISA were confirmed (slope = 1.01 [0.91, 1.11], intercept = 0.00 [-0.47, 0]). However, significant discrepancies were found in AAb detection during remission phases with ADAMTS-13 activity between 10% and 50%, with CLIA and ELISA showing significant divergence ( P  < .001, Cohen's g  = 0.34). Consistently, VWF multimers and activity levels exhibited significantly different values between remission samples with ADAMTS-13 activity below 50% and above 50%. In longitudinal analysis of patients with multiple iTTP relapses, positivity to CLIA appears to precede ELISA in predicting exacerbations., Conclusion: While CLIA and ELISA might be interchangeable for assessing ADAMTS-13 activity, they are not equivalent for detecting AAbs, particularly in patients in clinical remission with ADAMTS-13 activity between 10% and 50%., (© 2024 The Authors.)

Background: Immune‐mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP) is a rare disease characterized by the presence of anti‐ADAMTS13 autoantibodies. Achieving accurate information on incidence and customary disease management is important to provide appropriate diagnostic and therapeutic resources. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence and outcomes of iTTP in Spain. Study design and methods: A cross‐sectional survey was carried out among Spanish hospitals, focused on iTTP patients ≥16 years old attended between 2015 and 2017, and those at follow‐up before that interval. Incidence, prevalence, mortality, refractoriness, exacerbations, treatment complications, relapses, and sequelae were estimated. Results: Forty‐two hospitals covering roughly 20 million inhabitants answered the survey and reported 203 episodes (138 newly‐diagnosed and 65 relapses), of which 193 (95.1%) were treated. Incidence was 2.67 (95% CI 1.90‐3.45) patients per million inhabitants per year and prevalence 21.44 (95% CI% 19.10‐23.73) patients per million inhabitants. At diagnosis, ADAMTS13 activity and anti‐ADAMTS13 autoantibody were measured in 97% and 84.3% of reported episodes, respectively. Fifteen patients (7.4%) died as a direct consequence of iTTP, 6 of them before receiving any iTTP‐specific treatment. Thirty‐one (16.1%) of the 193 treated episodes were refractory to plasma exchange and corticosteroids, and 51 (26.4%) suffered at least one exacerbation. Conclusion: iTTP incidence and prevalence were somewhat higher than those documented in neighboring countries. Together with data on treatments and outcomes, this information will allow us to better estimate what is needed to improve diagnosis and prognosis of iTTP patients in Spain. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP) is a rare hematologic disease caused by autoantibodies against ADAMTS-13 that trigger microangiopathic hemolytic anemia. Therapeutic plasma exchange and glucocorticoids have been the mainstay of treatment for the past 30 years. In 2019, caplacizumab was approved as an addition to this regimen for the acute treatment of iTTP. Randomized controlled trials and real-world evidence have shown that caplacizumab reduces the time to platelet count normalization, refractoriness, and exacerbations of the disease, with an acceptable safety profile. In the past 5 years, there have been arguments against the upfront use of caplacizumab in all patients with iTTP, particularly related to the perceived lack of clinical benefit, safety concerns related to bleeding risk, and high costs. This perspective aimed to address these concerns in the context of the experience of expert centers that have used the drug for >5 years., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interests L.A.V. received research funding and consulting fees from Alexion, AstraZeneca, Bayer, and Sanofi-Genzyme. C.M. received consulting fees from Takeda and Sanofi-Genzyme. P.T.B. received speaker honoraria and consultant fees from AstraZeneca, Alexion, Bayer, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, Travere, Vifor CSL and participated in advisory boards for Alexion, Sanofi-Genzyme, Novartis, Travere, Takeda, Vifor CSL and Bayer. P.T.B. declares research funding from the German Research Foundation BR-2955/8. S.R.C. received consulting fees from Takeda and Sanofi-Genzyme., (Copyright © 2023 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Keywords: cerebral MRI abnormality; cognitive impairment; immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura EN cerebral MRI abnormality cognitive impairment immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura 671 672 2 12/07/20 20201201 NES 201201 Immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP) is a life-threatening thrombotic disorder caused by the production of anti-ADAMTS13 antibodies that leads to a severe decline in ADAMTS13 activity. Although some iTTP patients may relapse and receive additional treatments, the overall treatment outcomes for iTTP have improved significantly in the past three decades--from an unknown fetal disease to a well-understood and treatable autoimmune disorder. Alwan I et al i . investigated cerebral magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings in 131 patients (119 iTTP and 12 congenital TTP) who complained of various neurological symptoms, ranging from persistent headache to seizures, during acute episodes of TTP. [Extracted from the article]

Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) is an extremely rare and fatal thrombotic disorder characterized by impaired enzyme activity of von Willebrand factor cleaving protease, also known as ADAMTS13. Immune-mediated TTP (iTTP) is an acquired form of TTP caused by the production of auto-antibodies against ADAMTS13. The pathophysiology of autoimmune disorders is multifactorial, with several human leukocyte antigen (HLA) alleles identified as a genetic risk factor for autoimmune diseases known as susceptible HLA. In the early 2010s, three distinct European groups revealed that DRB1 * 11 is one of the most susceptible alleles in acquiring iTTP among Caucasians based on HLA typing data. Several in silico predictions for allele-restricted ADAMTS13 epitopes against T cells are made in this context, followed by an in vitro validation employing mass spectrometry using eluted peptides and T-cell assays. However, similar analyses in a genetically distinct Japanese population have not yet been conducted. We used next-generation sequencing to perform HLA typing for 52 Japanese patients with iTTP from 19 institutes. Our detailed analysis revealed that the specific allele DRB1 * 08:03 was identified as a genetic risk factor for iTTP in Japanese patients, but there were no statistically significant differences in the allele frequency of DRB1 * 11 between iTTP and healthy controls.