Search

Primary schizophreniform psychoses are thought to be caused by complex gene–environment interactions. Secondary forms are based on a clearly identifiable organic cause, in terms of either an etiological or a relevant pathogenetic factor. The secondary or “symptomatic” forms of psychosis have reentered the focus stimulated by the discovery of autoantibody (Ab)-associated autoimmune encephalitides (AEs), such as anti-NMDA-R encephalitis, which can at least initially mimic variants of primary psychosis. These newly described secondary, immune-mediated schizophreniform psychoses typically present with the acute onset of polymorphic psychotic symptoms. Over the course of the disease, other neurological phenomena, such as epileptic seizures, movement disorders, or reduced levels of consciousness, usually arise. Typical clinical signs for AEs are the acute onset of paranoid hallucinatory symptoms, atypical polymorphic presentation, psychotic episodes in the context of previous AE, and additional neurological and medical symptoms such as catatonia, seizure, dyskinesia, and autonomic instability. Predominant psychotic courses of AEs have also been described casuistically. The term autoimmune psychosis (AP) was recently suggested for these patients. Paraclinical alterations that can be observed in patients with AE/AP are inflammatory cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pathologies, focal or generalized electroencephalographic slowing or epileptic activity, and/or suspicious “encephalitic” imaging findings. The antibody analyses in these patients include the testing of the most frequently found Abs against cell surface antigens (NMDA-R, CASPR2, LGI1, AMPA-R, GABAB-R), intracellular antigens (Hu, Ri, Yo, CV2/CRMP5, Ma2 [Ta], amphiphysin, GAD65), thyroid antigens (TG, TPO), and antinuclear Abs (ANA). Less frequent antineuronal Abs (e.g., against DPPX, GABAA-R, glycine-R, IgLON5) can be investigated in the second step when first step screening is negative and/or some specific clinical factors prevail. Beyond, tissue-based assays on brain slices of rodents may detect previously unknown antineuronal Abs in some cases. The detection of clinical and/or paraclinical pathologies (e.g., pleocytosis in CSF) in combination with antineuronal Abs and the exclusion of alternative causes may lead to the diagnosis of AE/AP and enable more causal therapeutic immunomodulatory opportunities.

The anti-CD38 antibody daratumumab is approved for treatment of refractory multiple myeloma and acts by depletion of plasma cells and modification of various T-cell functions. Its safety, immunological effects and therapeutic potential was evaluated in a 60-year old patient with life-threatening and treatment-refractory anti-CASPR2 encephalitis requiring medical care and artificial ventilation in an intensive care unit. His autoimmune dysfunction was driven by exceptional high anti-CASPR2 autoantibody titers combined with an abnormally increased T-cell activation. As he remained unresponsive to standard and escalation immunotherapies (methylprednisolone, plasma exchange, immunoadsorption, immunoglobulins, rituximab and bortezomib), therapy was escalated to 13 cycles of 16 mg/kg daratumumab. During the treatment period, clinical, radiological, histological and laboratory findings, including quantification of autoreactive and protective antibody levels and FACS-based immune phenotyping, were analyzed. Daratumumab treatment was associated with significant clinical improvement, substantial reduction of anti-CASPR2 antibody titers, especially in CSF, decrease of immunoglobulin levels and protective vaccine titers, as well as normalization of initially increased T-cell activation markers. However, the patient died of Gram-negative septicemia in a neurorehabilitation center. In conclusion, our findings suggest that daratumumab induces not only depletion of autoreactive long-lived plasma cells associated with improvements of neurological sequelae, but also severe side effects requiring clinical studies investigating efficacy and safety of anti-CD38 therapy in antibody-driven autoimmune encephalitis.

Background and ObjectivesTo determine the real-world use of rituximab in autoimmune encephalitis (AE) and to correlate rituximab treatment with the long-term outcome.MethodsPatients with NMDA receptor (NMDAR)-AE, leucine-rich glioma-inactivated-1 (LGI1)- AE, contactin-associated protein-like-2 (CASPR2)-AE, or glutamic acid decarboxylase 65 (GAD65) disease from the GErman Network for Research on AuToimmune Encephalitis who had received at least 1 rituximab dose and a control cohort of non–rituximab-treated patients were analyzed retrospectively.ResultsOf the 358 patients, 163 (46%) received rituximab (NMDAR-AE: 57%, CASPR2-AE: 44%, LGI1-AE: 43%, and GAD65 disease: 37%). Rituximab treatment was initiated significantly earlier in NMDAR- and LGI1-AE (median: 54 and 155 days from disease onset) compared with CASPR2-AE or GAD65 disease (median: 632 and 1,209 days). Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores improved significantly in patients with NMDAR-AE, both with and without rituximab treatment. Although being more severely affected at baseline, rituximab-treated patients with NMDAR-AE more frequently reached independent living (mRS score ≤2) (94% vs 88%). In LGI1-AE, rituximab-treated and nontreated patients improved, whereas in CASPR2-AE, only rituximab-treated patients improved significantly. No improvement was observed in patients with GAD65 disease. A significant reduction of the relapse rate was observed in rituximab-treated patients (5% vs 13%). Detection of NMDAR antibodies was significantly associated with mRS score improvement. A favorable outcome was also observed with early treatment initiation.DiscussionWe provide real-world data on immunosuppressive treatments with a focus on rituximab treatment for patients with AE in Germany. We suggest that early and short-term rituximab therapy might be an effective and safe treatment option in most patients with NMDAR-, LGI1-, and CASPR2-AE.Class of EvidenceThis study provides Class IV evidence that rituximab is an effective treatment for some types of AE.

A 16-year-old boy presented with a 3-week history of back pain, insomnia, profuse sweating, and constipation following a respiratory infection. Physical examination revealed tachycardia, arterial hypertension, muscle weakness, and postural tremor. After hospital admission, he showed almost complete insomnia and massive hyperhidrosis, forcing him to change clothes every 15 minutes and drink up to 12 L/d. He deteriorated, with confusion, hallucination, and additional motor symptoms like fasciculations, areflexia, and muscle cramps/stiffness of both legs that prevented walking. His modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score was 4. Initial blood chemistry only revealed mild hyponatremia. Repeated neuroimaging and extended screening for infectious and neoplastic disease were unremarkable. Electroneurography revealed demyelinating peripheral neuropathy and EMG showed rare spontaneous discharges without the full picture of peripheral nerve hyperexcitability. Serum catecholamine levels were elevated and CSF analysis revealed high protein levels with normal cell count and without oligoclonal bands. Antineuronal antibody screening in serum detected antibodies against the voltage-gated potassium channel (VGKC) complex by radioimmunoassay (RIA, 283 pmol/L) and high titers (1:10,000) against contactin-associated protein 2 (CASPR2) by a commercial cell-based assay (CBA; indirect immunofluorescence on BIOCHIP-Mosaic, Euroimmun, Lubeck, Germany). As the CNS was strongly affected, we analyzed CSF reactivity with a tissue-based assay (TBA). CSF incubation on murine brain sections and subsequent visualization with fluorescent-labeled antihuman immunoglobulin G antibodies revealed a strong signal in the neuropil, mainly of hippocampus and cerebellum (figure, A–D). The CBA confirmed a low CSF anti-CASPR2 antibody titer (1:10) without intrathecal synthesis (table e-1, [links.lww.com/WNL/A71][1], for full diagnostic results). [1]: http://links.lww.com/WNL/A71