1. تحلیل و ترسیم شبکه مفهومی پژوهشهای حوزه م...
- Author
-
حمید احمدی and فرشاد پرهام نیا
- Subjects
SCIENTIFIC knowledge ,CONCEPTUAL structures ,DATABASES ,DATA visualization ,SCIENTIFIC method - Abstract
In this research, the conceptual dimensions of research in the field of scientific authority were analyzed with the aim of analysis of the conceptual structure of knowledge in this field in Iran. In order to achieve this goal, the main questions is: What is the conceptual structure of “scientific authority” knowledge in Iran based on existing scientific documents? In this research, the technique of co-word analysis, information clustering and social network analysis were used. The study population of this research includes all scientific documents including Persian articles, books, theses and research projects from the beginning to January 2023. Research tools include software in the field of scientometrics such as Ravar_matrix, Ucinet, NetDraw, and VOSviewer. To collect data from databases such as Noormags Database, Magiran Database, Magiran, ISC Database and SID Database, List of National and University Libraries, GANJ Database, other specific indexes, search engines such as Google, etc. were used. To retrieve documents related to scientific authority, from all search strategies including advanced, simple and review, and sometimes semi-automatic text mining with keywords “scientific authority”, “scientific originality”, “scientific leadership”, “academic leadership”, “scientific reviewer”, and “university professors” were used to extract related scientific documents. The results related to co-lexical analysis showed that more than 241 concepts or keywords were mentioned in this field and the concepts of “scientific authority” in particular with the highest frequency, Ahl al-Bayt, Holy Qur’an, gaining or achieving authority, University of Medical Sciences, University “Leadership perspective and higher education” have had the most frequency among all concepts. Also, 30 concepts such as “indigenization of science”, “scientific dynamism”, “scientific vitality”, “scientific capital”, “scientific authority”, “civilization-building research”, “scientific authority”, “scientism”, “scientific flow”, “promotion chair”, “frontiers of knowledge”, “social innovation”, “scientific heritage”, “leaders of science” were identified as emerging concepts in the researches. The results related to clustering showed that the knowledge of this field in Iran consists of 13 main clusters. Drawing conceptual maps of the field of knowledge of scientific authority showed that the formed network of concepts has discontinuity and its concepts are less connected with each other. Considering that its density is around 0.0268, it cannot be said that its conceptual network is dense. Network density is a number that is in the range between one and zero. The closer the network density score is to one, it indicates more density and the closer to zero, it indicates the laxity and disconnection of the network. According to the density of the network, it can be concluded that the number of 20 to 30 concepts has caused cohesion in a part of the conceptual network of this field. In this regard, the density map visualized this situation well and showed where the hot spots in the field of scientific authority are concentrated in the network and in the vicinity of what concepts. The term scientific authority was first proposed by the Supreme Leader and after that it was explained many times and various researchers have defined, interpreted and explained the concept of scientific authority. This research was done on the basis of what has been written so far about the scientific authority of research and writing, not what it should be. In this study, an attempt was made to express the concepts from the point of view of information visualization technology, and by drawing conceptual maps, their relationships were depicted. Surely, readers and those interested in this field can find more conceptual relationships governing the field. This research is done for the first time with this method. Also, no research has been done with this method in the field of scientific authority so far. Therefore, matching the findings with some of the previous results of this research are not equivalent. Therefore, the findings were also different from them. Perhaps it can be claimed that these findings were the result of the activities of Iranian researchers in the field of scientific authority from the time it was raised by the Supreme Leader in 2014 until today. This research provided a conceptual macro picture of the field of scientific authority. It is hoped that officials, curators and researchers who work for the development of this field will use the results of this research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF