Search

Hypomethylating agents (HMA) and venetoclax (VEN) are commonly used in patients with IDH-mutated (IDHm) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) ineligible for induction chemotherapy. While prior studies demonstrated high response and survival rates with HMA/VEN in IDHm AML, the impact of treatment modifications in real-world settings is unclear. We retrospectively reviewed 89 IDHm AML patients treated with HMA/VEN from January 2018 to June 2023. CR/CRi rates were 76% in newly diagnosed (ND) and 55% in relapsed/refractory (R/R) patients, and median overall survival was 29.2 months (ND) and 17.1 months (R/R), respectively. Treatment modifications were common. Early VEN reductions were associated with lower response rates but not worse survival. Prolonged cycles were not associated with worse response rates or survival. Significant neutropenia and ED visits or unplanned hospitalizations were considerable before and after CR/CRi, though febrile neutropenia decreased afterward. HMA/VEN is efficacious, with treatment modifications not affecting survival, though long-term toxicities are notable. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneous blood-related neoplasm that predominantly afflicts older adults with a poor prognosis due to their physical condition and the presence of medical accompanying comorbidities, adverse biological disease features, and suitability for induction intensive chemotherapy and allogenic stem cells transplantation. Recent research into the molecular and biological factors contributing to disease development and progression has led to significant advancements in treatment approaches for older patients with AML. This review article discusses the latest biological and therapeutic developments that are transforming the management of AML in older adults.

Our retrospective study (2010–2020) examined treatment patterns, outcomes, and healthcare resource utilization in Finnish acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. Data covered 153 patients diagnosed at Hospital District of Southwest Finland (HDSF) and 107 from other districts who underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation (aSCT) at HDSF. Of the 153 patients, 56.2% received intensive chemotherapy (IC), while 43.8% deemed ineligible for IC received low‐intensity therapies or best supportive care (BSC). Median overall survival for IC patients was 31.2 months, compared to 5.3 months for those under azacytidine and 1.2 months on BSC. Majority (57.5%) of patients over 60 with intermediate/high European leukemia network risk had poor outcomes with IC and couldn't proceed to aSCT. These patients carried the highest costs and hospital resource use per patient month. Most common reasons for transplant ineligibility after IC were refractory disease and infection. Our data provides a comprehensive view on AML treatment landscape from a period when the latest treatment advancements were not yet accessible. The data describes patient groups with poor prognosis and increased healthcare burden, emphasizing the need to improve treatment practices and identify better ways to get more patients to transplant, in a rapidly evolving treatment landscape. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneous blood-related neoplasm that predominantly afflicts older adults with a poor prognosis due to their physical condition and the presence of medical accompanying comorbidities, adverse biological disease features, and suitability for induction intensive chemotherapy and allogenic stem cells transplantation. Recent research into the molecular and biological factors contributing to disease development and progression has led to significant advancements in treatment approaches for older patients with AML. This review article discusses the latest biological and therapeutic developments that are transforming the management of AML in older adults. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: NPM1‐mutated (NPM1mut) myeloid neoplasms (MNs) with <20% bone marrow (BM) blasts (NPM1mut MNs<20) are uncommon, and their classification remains inconsistent. Methods: The clinicopathologic features of 54 patients with NPM1mut MNs <20 were evaluated and compared with wild‐type NPM1 MNs <20 and NPM1mut MNs≥20, respectively. Results: NPM1mut MNs had similar features regardless of blast percentage, except for higher IDH2 (29% vs 7%, p =.023) and FLT3 (70% vs 11%, p <.001) frequency in patients with ≥20% BM blasts. Thirty‐three (61%) patients with NPM1mut MNs <20 received low‐intensity chemotherapy (LIC) and 12 (22%) received intensive chemotherapy (IC). Higher complete remission rates (75% vs 27%, p =.006) and median overall survival (mOS) (not reached vs 30.4 months, p =.06) were observed with IC compared to LIC. Young patients (age <60 years) did not reach mOS either when treated with LIC or IC. Stem cell transplant was associated with increased survival only in patients treated with LIC (HR, 0.24; p =.025). No differences in mOS were observed by BM blast strata (32.2 months, not reached and 46.9 months for <10%, 10%–19%, and ≥20% blasts, p =.700) regardless of treatment modality (LIC: p =.900; IC: p =.360). Twenty‐three patients (43%) with NPM1mut MNs <20 had marrow blast progression to ≥20%. Conclusions: Overall, NPM1mut MNs define a unique entity independent of BM blast percentage. NPM1 mutations define a unique leukemia entity regardless of bone marrow blast percentage. Patients with NPM1‐mutated myeloid neoplasms benefit from intensive chemotherapy approaches even in the setting of low bone marrow blast percentage. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The document discusses the importance of antiviral prophylaxis to prevent herpes simplex virus (HSV) and varicella zoster virus (VZV) reactivation in adult patients with newly diagnosed acute leukemia. It highlights the efficacy of antiviral medications like acyclovir in reducing the incidence of symptomatic HSV reactivation during intensive chemotherapy. The study conducted in Italian centers belonging to SEIFEM group revealed a heterogeneous scenario in antiviral prophylaxis policies, with some centers not adhering to current international guidelines. The authors suggest the need for harmonization in applying antiviral prevention approaches and further prospective studies to optimize the schedule and duration of antiviral prophylaxis in different acute leukemia subgroups. [Extracted from the article]

Introduction: Triple‐ and quad‐refractory multiple myeloma patients usually have an aggressive course and a poor prognosis. Available therapeutic options are scarce. Methods: The objective of the current study was to evaluate responses and toxicities of VDTPACE or mCBAD with hematopoietic stem‐cell support as a bridge to subsequent therapies in patients with refractory/relapsed multiple myeloma. Results: Thirteen patients were included (11 mCBAD, 2 VDTPACE), and 21 cycles of chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem‐cell support were delivered. Mean number of previous therapies was 4.8. Stem cells were infused on a median day 9.9 after chemotherapy. Mean time to neutrophil recovery was 18.2 days in patients receiving the first cycle and 15.9 following subsequent cycles. Before therapy, most patients were in PD (77%), PR (15%), or VGPR (8%). Following treatment, the best responses achieved were PR (46%), VGPR (46%), and CR (8%). Median overall and progression‐free survivals were 17 and 9 months. There has been no case of non‐relapse mortality. In the 21 cycles, the main complications were infectious. Conclusion: Intensive chemotherapy can decrease disease burden in patients with relapsed/refractory MM, and stem‐cell support can successfully decrease toxicities and treatment‐related mortality associated with these regimens and may be a good bridging option. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Core‐binding factor acute myeloid leukemia (CBF‐AML) is characterized by the presence of inv(16)/t(16;16) or t(8;21) and is classified as a favorable risk by the 2022 European LeukemiaNet (ELN) guidelines. The CD33‐targeting antibody‐drug conjugate, gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO), is commonly added to intensive chemotherapy (IC) in CBF‐AML. We sought to compare outcomes in patients treated with IC with or without GO in CBF‐AML. We included 200 patients with CBF‐AML treated with IC across seven academic centers. Induction treatment regimens were categorized as IC alone, IC with GO, or IC with KIT inhibitor (dasatinib or midostaurin). Median follow‐up for the whole cohort was 2.5 years. Three‐year overall survival (OS) was 70% and 3‐year event‐free survival (EFS) was 51%. Patients treated with IC with GO experienced a 3‐year EFS of 50% compared to those treated with IC alone who experienced a 3‐year EFS of 47%, with no statistically significant difference (p = 0.62). Similarly, those treated with IC with GO did not experience an improved OS compared to those treated with IC alone (p = 0.67). Patients treated with IC with KIT inhibitor experienced a significantly improved 3‐year EFS of 85% compared to those with IC with or without GO (p = 0.04). We find in our study that there is no survival benefit in patients treated with IC with the addition of GO; improved EFS was seen in patients with CBF‐AML treated with IC plus KIT inhibitors, consistent with outcomes noted in prospective studies utilizing this approach.

Summary: Background: Second primary malignancies (SPMs) are a well-known, long-term complication of antineoplastic treatment. This nationwide cohort study examined the risk of non-myeloid SPMs in survivors of adult acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) treated with intensive chemotherapy and, in some cases, allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT), compared to a matched general population. Methods: Patients with incident AML between 2000 and 2018, alive and aged 18–70 years two years after start of intensive chemotherapy, were included and matched 1:10 to comparators from the general Danish population on sex, age, and the Nordic Multimorbidity Index. Exclusion criteria were non-myeloid SPMs for both AML survivors and comparators. Findings: A total of 750 AML survivors and 7500 comparators were followed for a median of 10.6 years. The hazard ratio (HR) of non-myeloid SPMs was 1.55 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.27–1.89) for AML survivors compared to comparators, driven by non-melanoma skin cancer (HR 2.52, 95% CI 1.90–3.35), not of solid cancer (HR 1.14, 95% CI 0.87–1.49). The 10-year cumulative incidences of any non-myeloid SPM were 13.5% (95% CI 10.6–16.5%) in AML survivors and 11.9% (95% CI 11.1–12.8%) in matched comparators. Additionally, AML survivors consolidated with alloSCT had a higher hazard rate of non-myeloid SPMs compared to non-transplanted AML survivors (adjusted HR 1.50, 95% CI 1.00–2.26). Interpretation: The increased rate of non-myeloid SPMs observed in this population-based cohort study of AML survivors was almost entirely driven by non-melanoma skin cancer and is thus outweighed by the importance of intensive chemotherapy. Funding: Svend Andersen, Heinrich Kopps, and Karen Elise Jensen’s Foundation.

Simple Summary: Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most common childhood malignancy. Survival rates for children with ALL have improved, and today, more than 90% of children with ALL can be successfully treated. Acute pancreatitis (AP), which develops during chemotherapy for ALL can be a serious and fatal complication. It is a widely known toxicity, and several reports indicate that AP occurs with an incidence of 2–10% in patients treated for leukemia. It is mainly, but not exclusively, associated with the administration of asparaginase (ASP), which is one of the key components of multiagent chemotherapy used in ALL. The development of AP usually delays subsequent courses of chemotherapy and is the most common reason for the discontinuation of ASP, thus increasing the potential risk of leukemia relapse in children with ALL. Therefore, both the pathogenesis of AP in ALL and its impact on long-term outcomes remain to be thoroughly investigated. Purpose: This study aimed to identify the risk factors for acute pancreatitis (AP) and its impact on outcomes in Polish children treated for ALL. Methods: The study group included 2303 children receiving intensive chemotherapy for ALL. The group was divided into patients with at least one episode of AP and those who did not develop AP after treatment for ALL. Results: The cumulative incidence of AP in the study group was 4.08%. Older age was an independent risk factor for the development of AP (OR = 1.05; 95%CI = 1.006–1.098; p = 0.03). The overall mortality associated with AP was 2.13%. The probabilities of disease-free survival (p-DFS) and event-free survival (p-EFS) in both subgroups were 0.84 vs. 0.86, log-rank p = 0.65 and 0.75 vs. 0.80, log-rank p = 0.12, respectively. A total of 22 out of 94 patients (23.4%) with AP were re-exposed to asparaginase (ASP) during the subsequent treatment phases. Only one patient re-exposed to ASP (4.5%) developed a second episode of AP. There were no significant differences in p-DFS and p-EFS between patients re-exposed and not re-exposed to asparaginase (0.78 vs. 0.86, log-rank p = 0.27 and 0.63 vs. 0.79, log-rank p = 0.09, respectively). Conclusions: The incidence of AP in children with ALL is low and related to patients' age. The development of AP does not seem to influence p-DFS and p-EFS in children with ALL. Recurrence of AP after re-exposure to asparaginase in patients with ALL and a history of AP is low (4.5%). Re-exposure to asparaginase after the first episode of AP does not improve either p-DFS or p-EFS in children with ALL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Data on posaconazole serum levels of patients on prophylaxis with delayed-release tablets or oral suspension during intensive chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome are scarce. In this analysis, the proportion of patients with acute myeloid leukemia/myelodysplastic syndrome achieving posaconazole target concentrations with delayed-release tablets was higher than with oral suspension. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with myelodysplasia‐related characteristics is a heterogeneous subset of AML that has been challenged throughout the history of myeloid malignancies classifications, considered to have similar outcomes as intermediate‐ or adverse‐risk AML depending on the subgroup. However, little is known about the fate of these patients in refractory or relapsed situation (R/R) after first line therapy. Methods: A large series of R/R AML patients, recorded in the French DATAML registry, have received either intensive chemotherapy (ICT), azacitidine (AZA) as single agent, or best supportive care (BSC). A cohort of 183 patients (median age 63‐year‐old) with what was called at the time AML‐MRC has been explored, and data are reported here. Results: Patient status was refractory for 93, while 90 had relapsed. Respectively, 88, 34, and 61 were included in the three treatment arms. The median OS of the whole cohort was 4.2 months (95%CI: 3.1–5.6) with a mean 1‐year overall survival of 24% ± 3.2%. There was no significant survival difference between refractory and relapsed patients. The BSC group had overall a significantly worse outcome (p = 0.0001), and this remained true in both refractory (p = 0.01) and relapsed (p = 0.002) patients. Similar survivals were observed in both groups comparing ICT and AZA. Conclusions: These data, reporting about an ill‐explored population, indicate the poor prognosis of this condition where both ICT and AZA can be proposed. The latter, which was demonstrated here to be a feasible option, should be added to new targeted therapies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Therapeutic regimens and outcome of acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) patients substantially improved over the past decades. However, AML in older patients is still widely understudied and therapeutic standards are far less well defined. This study provides a retrospective analysis of a cohort of AML patients above 65 years of age treated at a single university centre in Germany. Treatment regimens including intensive chemotherapy with or without subsequent allogenic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT), hypomethylating agent (HMA) or low-dose cytarabine (LD-AraC) based therapy or best supportive care (BSC) were evaluated and compared to patient-specific variables, comorbidities indices such as Haematopoietic Cell Transplantation-specific Comorbidity Index (HCT-CI) or Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), or Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status to assess their potential impact on outcome. 229 patients ≥ 65 years with newly diagnosed AML were included in this study. Patients received either intensive chemotherapy (IT) without (n = 101, 44%), or followed by allo-SCT (n = 27, 12%), HMA (n = 29, 13%), LD-Ara-C (n = 16, 7%) or best supportive care (BSC) only (n = 56, 24%). Of interest, ECOG performance status predicted overall survival in patients treated with IT, and combinatorial assessment of ECOG and HCT-CI was particularly useful to predict outcome in this subgroup of patients. Subsets of AML patients above 65 years of age benefit from intensive chemotherapy and allogenic stem cell transplantation. Combined assessment of ECOG scores and HCT-CI might help to objectively identify suitable patients, and this concept should be further investigated in a prospective manner in future studies. Selected subsets of AML patients may profit from intensive chemotherapy and allogenic stem cell transplantation. Combined analysis of ECOG performance status and HCT-CI might help to predict outcome in elderly AML patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background CPX‐351 is approved for the treatment of therapy related acute myeloid leukemia (t‐AML) and AML with myelodysplastic related changes (MRC‐AML). The benefits of this treatment over standard chemotherapy has not been addressed in well matched cohorts of real‐life patients. Methods Retrospective analysis of AML patients treated with CPX‐351 as per routine practice. A propensity score matching (PSM) was used to compare their main outcomes with those observed in a matched cohort among 765 historical patients receiving intensive chemotherapy (IC), all of them reported to the PETHEMA epidemiologic registry. Results Median age of 79 patients treated with CPX‐351 was 67 years old (interquartile range 62–71), 53 were MRC‐AML. The complete remission (CR) rate or CR without recovery (CRi) after 1 or 2 cycles of CPX‐351 was 52%, 60‐days mortality 18%, measurable residual disease

Introduction: Adult T-cell leukemia lymphoma (ATLL) is an aggressive mature T-cell neoplasm caused by human T-cell lymphotropic virus type 1 (HTLV-1) infection. Despite its poor prognosis, there is no standard therapy for ATLL due to its low incidence and the disease affecting only endemic geographical clusters. Methods: A retrospective evaluation of patients with the diagnosis of ATLL at Moffitt Cancer Center and Memorial Healthcare System was done to identify patients and disease characteristics along with the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for the different therapies used. Results: The 61 patients analyzed showed a median age of 58 with 82.5% of them being of African American descent. The acute variant contributed to the majority of cases (43.9%), followed by 36.8% presenting as a lymphoma variant. There was no statistical difference in the PFS (6.4 m, 3.1 m, 2.1 m; p = 0.23) or OS (14 m, 8.9 m, 18.5 m; p = 0.14) between cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP), intensive chemotherapy regimens, and other modalities, respectively. However, the patients who had complete or partial remission with first-line therapy had better OS (15.9 m vs. 7.2 m; p = 0.004). Conclusions: The study highlighted the poor outcome of the current regimens and the lack of a unifying protocol for this vicious disease. The acute variants were treated with more intensive regimens, but there was no difference in the OS between the three major options of CHOP, intensified chemotherapy, and others. This underscores the need for more clinical trials to develop better outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background BRAF mutation occurs in 5%–10% of metastatic colorectal cancers (mCRCs). Patients with BRAF mutant mCRC exhibit a specific metastatic pattern and poor prognosis. Survival outcomes are heterogeneous in cases of mCRC with a BRAF mutation. The optimal first‐line therapy is still controversial. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with mCRC between June 2010 and December 2021. Clinicopathologic characteristics, treatment and BRAF mutation testing results were collected. Patients with a BRAF mutation were included. Kaplan–Meier methods and log‐rank tests were used to analyze and compare survival. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to establish the predictive nomogram model. Results Of the 4475 mCRC, 261 have a BRAF mutation, including 240 V600E and 21 non‐V600E mutants. The median overall survival (OS) was 18.2 months in the BRAF V600E mutant group versus 38.0 months in the non‐V600E mutant group (p = 0.022). ECOG score, tumor differentiation, liver metastasis, bone metastasis and primary tumor resection were independent prognostic factors for the OS of BRAF V600E mutant mCRC. A nomogram model was established using these factors. The median OS was 39.3 m, 18.2 m and 10.7 m for the low‐risk, intermediate‐risk and high‐risk groups defined by this model, respectively (p

Abstract Background TP53 mutations, which are present in 5% to 10% of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), are associated with treatment resistance and poor outcomes. First-line therapies for TP53-mutated (TP53m) AML consist of intensive chemotherapy (IC), hypomethylating agents (HMA), or venetoclax combined with HMA (VEN + HMA). Methods We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to describe and compare treatment outcomes in newly diagnosed treatment-naïve patients with TP53m AML. Randomized controlled trials, single-arm trials, prospective observational studies, and retrospective studies were included that reported on complete remission (CR), CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi), overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), duration of response (DoR), and overall response rate (ORR) among patients with TP53m AML receiving first-line treatment with IC, HMA, or VEN + HMA. Results Searches of EMBASE and MEDLINE identified 3006 abstracts, and 17 publications describing 12 studies met the inclusion criteria. Random-effects models were used to pool response rates, and time-related outcomes were analyzed with the median of medians method. IC was associated with the greatest CR rate of 43%, and CR rates were 33% for VEN + HMA and 13% for HMA. Rates of CR/CRi were comparable for IC (46%) and VEN + HMA (49%) but were lower for HMA (13%). Median OS was uniformly poor across treatments: IC, 6.5 months; VEN + HMA, 6.2 months; and HMA, 6.1 months. For IC, the EFS estimate was 3.7 months; EFS was not reported for VEN + HMA or HMA. The ORR was 41% for IC, 65% for VEN + HMA, and 47% for HMA. DoR was 3.5 months for IC, 5.0 months for VEN + HMA, and was not reported for HMA. Conclusions Despite improved responses seen with IC and VEN + HMA compared to HMA, survival was uniformly poor, and clinical benefits were limited across all treatments for patients with newly diagnosed, treatment-naïve TP53m AML, demonstrating a significant need for improved treatment for this difficult-to-treat population.

Background: CPX‐351 is approved for the treatment of therapy related acute myeloid leukemia (t‐AML) and AML with myelodysplastic related changes (MRC‐AML). The benefits of this treatment over standard chemotherapy has not been addressed in well matched cohorts of real‐life patients. Methods: Retrospective analysis of AML patients treated with CPX‐351 as per routine practice. A propensity score matching (PSM) was used to compare their main outcomes with those observed in a matched cohort among 765 historical patients receiving intensive chemotherapy (IC), all of them reported to the PETHEMA epidemiologic registry. Results: Median age of 79 patients treated with CPX‐351 was 67 years old (interquartile range 62–71), 53 were MRC‐AML. The complete remission (CR) rate or CR without recovery (CRi) after 1 or 2 cycles of CPX‐351 was 52%, 60‐days mortality 18%, measurable residual disease <0.1% in 54% (12 out of 22) of them. Stem cell transplant (SCT) was performed in 27 patients (34%), median OS was 10.3 months, and 3‐year relapse incidence was 50%. Using PSM, we obtained two comparable cohorts treated with CPX‐351 (n = 52) or IC (n = 99), without significant differences in CR/CRi (60% vs. 54%) and median OS (10.3 months vs. 9.1 months), although more patients were bridged to SCT in the CPX‐351 group (35% vs. 12%). The results were confirmed when only 3 + 7 patients were included in the historical cohort. In multivariable analyses, SCT was associated with better OS (HR 0.33 95% CI: 0.18–0.59), p < 0.001. Conclusion: Larger post‐authorization studies may provide evidence of the clinical benefits of CPX‐351 for AML in the real‐life setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cranial imaging (CI) is a widely used diagnostic procedure, especially in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients with suspected bleeding or infection. However, common clinical decision rules to guide CI do not apply to AML patients and the diagnostic yield and outcomes of CI for AML patients are largely unknown. We retrospectively evaluated all CI from newly diagnosed non-promyelocytic AML patients receiving intensive induction or consolidation chemotherapy between 2007 and 2019 for imaging indications, diagnostic yield, and consequences. A total of 110 of 462 patients (24%) received CI for 152 imagings in distinct clinical situations. Forty-four patients (40%) had at least one new and acute pathological finding. Main indication was focal neurologic deficit, craniocerebral trauma, and suspected cerebral hypertension. The most common new finding was intracranial hemorrhage (13% of all imagings), followed by sinusitis (9%). CI led to therapy change in 21 patients. There were no clear associations between indications, laboratory values, and a positive imaging. Positive imaging was associated with adverse overall survival. Our study suggests that the overall rate of ordered CI was appropriate and that CI should generally be performed at a low threshold. A systematized approach to CI may further increase diagnostic yield but is complicated by variable clinical presentation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: BRAF mutation occurs in 5%–10% of metastatic colorectal cancers (mCRCs). Patients with BRAF mutant mCRC exhibit a specific metastatic pattern and poor prognosis. Survival outcomes are heterogeneous in cases of mCRC with a BRAF mutation. The optimal first‐line therapy is still controversial. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with mCRC between June 2010 and December 2021. Clinicopathologic characteristics, treatment and BRAF mutation testing results were collected. Patients with a BRAF mutation were included. Kaplan–Meier methods and log‐rank tests were used to analyze and compare survival. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to establish the predictive nomogram model. Results: Of the 4475 mCRC, 261 have a BRAF mutation, including 240 V600E and 21 non‐V600E mutants. The median overall survival (OS) was 18.2 months in the BRAF V600E mutant group versus 38.0 months in the non‐V600E mutant group (p = 0.022). ECOG score, tumor differentiation, liver metastasis, bone metastasis and primary tumor resection were independent prognostic factors for the OS of BRAF V600E mutant mCRC. A nomogram model was established using these factors. The median OS was 39.3 m, 18.2 m and 10.7 m for the low‐risk, intermediate‐risk and high‐risk groups defined by this model, respectively (p < 0.0001). Patients who received first‐line triplet chemotherapy ± bevacizumab had comparable progression free survival (PFS) and OS compared with those treated with doublets ± bevacizumab. Conclusion: BRAF V600E mutant mCRCs exhibit unfavorable and heterogeneous prognosis. The first‐line intensive chemotherapy did not confer a marked impact on the PFS and OS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Intensive chemotherapy (IC) is commonly used to achieve remission in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Venetoclax plus azacitidine (VEN-AZA) is FDA-approved to treat patients with AML aged ≥ 75 years or who are ineligible for IC. This retrospective analysis used de-identified electronic health records from the US-based Flatiron Health database from patients diagnosed 11/21/2018 to 10/31/2021 to compare treatment outcomes with VEN-AZA vs. IC. Patients were 1:1 propensity score-matched ( N = 276 ). Assessments included rates of complete remission (CR) and hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT), overall survival (OS), and relapse-free survival (RFS). CR and HSCT rates were higher with IC than with VEN-AZA (60.9% vs. 44.2% [P = 0.006] and 18.1% vs. 8.0% [P = 0.012], respectively). Median OS was 17.7 months in patients treated with IC and 11.3 months with VEN-AZA without censoring (P = 0.278) and 13.7 vs. 10.6 months, respectively, with censoring at HSCT (P = 0.584). Median RFS was 12.0 months in patients treated with IC vs. 9.5 months with VEN-AZA without censoring (P = 0.431) and 6.4 vs. 7.4 months, respectively, with censoring at HSCT (P = 0.444). No OS or RFS differences observed between the two arms reached statistical significance. Randomized controlled trials comparing the two approaches are warranted, as are novel approaches to reduce relapse rates following CR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: TP53 mutations, which are present in 5% to 10% of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), are associated with treatment resistance and poor outcomes. First-line therapies for TP53-mutated (TP53m) AML consist of intensive chemotherapy (IC), hypomethylating agents (HMA), or venetoclax combined with HMA (VEN + HMA). Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to describe and compare treatment outcomes in newly diagnosed treatment-naïve patients with TP53m AML. Randomized controlled trials, single-arm trials, prospective observational studies, and retrospective studies were included that reported on complete remission (CR), CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi), overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), duration of response (DoR), and overall response rate (ORR) among patients with TP53m AML receiving first-line treatment with IC, HMA, or VEN + HMA. Results: Searches of EMBASE and MEDLINE identified 3006 abstracts, and 17 publications describing 12 studies met the inclusion criteria. Random-effects models were used to pool response rates, and time-related outcomes were analyzed with the median of medians method. IC was associated with the greatest CR rate of 43%, and CR rates were 33% for VEN + HMA and 13% for HMA. Rates of CR/CRi were comparable for IC (46%) and VEN + HMA (49%) but were lower for HMA (13%). Median OS was uniformly poor across treatments: IC, 6.5 months; VEN + HMA, 6.2 months; and HMA, 6.1 months. For IC, the EFS estimate was 3.7 months; EFS was not reported for VEN + HMA or HMA. The ORR was 41% for IC, 65% for VEN + HMA, and 47% for HMA. DoR was 3.5 months for IC, 5.0 months for VEN + HMA, and was not reported for HMA. Conclusions: Despite improved responses seen with IC and VEN + HMA compared to HMA, survival was uniformly poor, and clinical benefits were limited across all treatments for patients with newly diagnosed, treatment-naïve TP53m AML, demonstrating a significant need for improved treatment for this difficult-to-treat population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treatment relied on anthracyclines and cytarabine based intensive chemotherapy. However, clinical outcomes are unsatisfied for patients with intermediate/adverse cytogenetics based on European Leukemia Net (ELN) risk stratification 2022 (ELN 2022), and relapses also remain common even in patients with favorable-risk cytogenetics with measurable residual disease (MRD). There is an urgent unmet need for optimizing intensive chemotherapy regimens with novel agents, to enhance the MRD-negative rate, achieve durable remission, and improve the prognosis of AML. Preliminary results showed that adding a B-cell lymphoma-2 (BCL-2) inhibitor to intensive chemotherapy could improve treatment efficacy. Sonrotoclax is a potent, selective, next-generation BCL-2 inhibitor that effectively inhibits both the wide-type BCL-2 and several BCL-2 mutants. We hypothesize that the addition of sonrotoclax to intensive chemotherapy may enhance the treatment efficacy for AML without untoward toxicity. Here, we describe the rationale and design of a single-arm, multicenter, phase 2 study evaluating the efficacy and safety of sonrotoclax combined with chemotherapy as an induction therapy in newly diagnosed patients with AML who are fit for intensive chemotherapy, followed by stratified subsequent consolidation and maintenance treatment based on patients' ELN2022 at diagnosis and MRD results after induction. Clinical Trail Registration : NCT06497062.

Introduction: Febrile neutropenia is one of the most serious complications in patients with hematological malignancies and chemotherapy. Channa striata is a freshwater fish belonging to the family Channidae. This study aims to determine whether the administration of channa striata extract can increase neutrophil count, neutrophil function and prevent incidence of febrile neutropenia in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients receiving chemotherapy., Method: A randomized, single-blind, controlled study compared a standard nutrition from hospital with a channa striata extract-supplemented per oral containing 6 grams of channa striata extract in patients with acute myeloid leukemia undergoing intensive chemotherapy. To analyze the effects of channa striata extract on function of neutrophil, Interleukin (IL)-6 and nitric oxide (NO) levels which are the result of neutrophil phagocytosis were assessed., Results: A total of 32 AML patients were randomized to receive per oral supplementation of channa striata extract (6 g/day) or nutrition from the hospital during intensive chemotherapy and after chemotherapy. The median onset of neutropenia was 6.1 + 3.37 in the channa striata extract group and 8.8 + 4.59 in the control group (p=0.109). The median duration of neutropenia was 12.8 + 6.20 d in the channa striata group and 17.2 + 11.06 d in the control group (p=0.281), whereas the incidence of febrile neutropenia were 85,7% in the channa striata extract group and 43,8% in the control group with median duration of neutropenic fever were 5.7 + 3.56 and 4.7 + 4.57, respectively. The chi-square test in the IL-6 delta category showed a tendency for IL-6 levels to rise in 61.5% of subjects in the Channa striata group compared to the control group (p=0.182)., Conclusion: Channa striata extract supplementation did not influence neutropenia onset, duration, neutrophil function, or neutropenic fever in AML patients.

Purpose of Review: Treatment of elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia is a known challenge for hematologists due to patient diversity, heterogeneous disease biology, and a rapidly evolving treatment landscape. Here, we highlight the importance of determining fitness, review the latest therapeutic developments, and discuss clinical scenarios to provide guidance on individualized treatment for older AML patients. Recent Findings: Several factors, like age, performance status, and comorbidities, play a role in fitness and are associated with outcome. Comorbidity scoring systems and geriatric assessments are tools to help physicians select the most appropriate treatment for each patient. The addition of venetoclax, targeted therapy with IDH1/2 and FLT3 inhibitors, and enhanced formulas of existing drugs like CPX-351 and oral azacitidine have improved responses and outcomes. Summary: New drugs and combination therapies have increased the therapeutic options for elderly AML patients but determination of fitness and disease biology is essential to select patient-tailored treatments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The United States Food and Drug Administration has approved several oral, targeted therapies for the treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) in recent years. These agents are approved in patients with relapsed/refractory disease or as frontline therapy in patients who are ineligible for intensive chemotherapy based on age, performance status, or comorbidities. They are also being increasingly utilized frontline in patients of all ages and fitness levels through clinical trials and off label prescribing, but comparative treatment outcomes associated with intensive versus targeted therapy have not been extensively studied. We conducted a single center, retrospective analysis to address the impact of treatment intensity on survival in patients with AML aged 60-75 at diagnosis. This study included 127 patients, 73 of whom received high intensity chemotherapy at any point during treatment (any HiC) and 54 of whom received only low intensity targeted therapy (LITT only). Overall survival (OS) from treatment initiation did not differ significantly between the any HiC and LITT only groups (hazard ratio (HR) for death, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.41 to 1.09; P=0.11). The only three variables that were independently associated with superior OS were lower European Leukemia Net (ELN) risk classification, TP53 unmutated status, and receipt of transplant. Our data suggest that baseline genomic features and receipt of transplant are more important than treatment intensity in predicting survival in this patient population. They also highlight the vital role of transplant in older patients with AML regardless of treatment intensity utilized for remission induction. Larger studies are needed to further address this question, including prospective randomized trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The United States Food and Drug Administration has approved several oral, targeted therapies for the treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) in recent years. These agents are approved in patients with relapsed/refractory disease or as frontline therapy in patients who are ineligible for intensive chemotherapy based on age, performance status, or comorbidities. They are also being increasingly utilized frontline in patients of all ages and fitness levels through clinical trials and off label prescribing, but comparative treatment outcomes associated with intensive versus targeted therapy have not been extensively studied. We conducted a single center, retrospective analysis to address the impact of treatment intensity on survival in patients with AML aged 60-75 at diagnosis. This study included 127 patients, 73 of whom received high intensity chemotherapy at any point during treatment (any HiC) and 54 of whom received only low intensity targeted therapy (LITT only). Overall survival (OS) from treatment initiation did not differ significantly between the any HiC and LITT only groups (hazard ratio (HR) for death, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.41 to 1.09; P=0.11). The only three variables that were independently associated with superior OS were lower European Leukemia Net (ELN) risk classification, TP53 unmutated status, and receipt of transplant. Our data suggest that baseline genomic features and receipt of transplant are more important than treatment intensity in predicting survival in this patient population. They also highlight the vital role of transplant in older patients with AML regardless of treatment intensity utilized for remission induction. Larger studies are needed to further address this question, including prospective randomized trials.

Venetoclax in combination with intensive therapies is explored in both the upfront and relapse/refractory (R/R) setting, and available data suggest that such regimens are effective albeit with added hematological and infectious toxicity. We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treated with venetoclax in combination with FLAG-IDA protocol. Twenty-five patients were included in this analysis (median age 53.4 years). Most patients were treated for R/R AML (n = 24, 96%) with a median of one (range 0–3) previous lines of therapy and 44% of patients (n = 11) having prior allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Median follow-up was 10 (range, 4–26) months. Platelet and neutrophil recovery were observed at a median of 31 (95% CI 17.6–38.3) and 23 (95% CI 20–28) days, respectively. The most common adverse events were infectious (blood stream infections, 48% and invasive fungal infections, 32%). Thirty-day mortality was 12%. Composite complete remission (CRc) was 72% for the entire cohort and 91% in patients treated for post-HCT relapse. Incidences of relapse-free and overall survival at 12 months were 67% (95% CI 58–76%) and 50% (95% CI 31–69%), respectively. Real-world data show that the addition of venetoclax to FLAG-IDA protocol is effective in patients with high-risk AML, most notably in the post-HCT relapse setting. Prophylaxis and surveillance for infections are crucial. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are routinely treated with either intensive chemotherapy or DNA hypomethylating agents (HMA) in combination with the Bcl-2 inhibitor, venetoclax. While both treatment regimens are highly cytotoxic to the aggressive AML tumor cells, they are also toxic to immune cells. Therefore, we sought to establish the detrimental impacts of these therapies on lymphocytes and their recovery over time in AML patients. Even prior to treatment initiation, the patients were found to have exhausted lymphocytes in peripheral blood, and additional signs of exhaustion were noted after treatment with HMA/venetoclax. In fact, the lymphocytes were still suppressed for two to three months after the initiation of induction therapy. Furthermore, T cells in a subset of patients subsequently found to be resistant to venetoclax therapy exhibited a higher expression of perforin and CD39 and more pronounced IFN-γ production. Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is an aggressive malignancy that requires rapid treatment with chemotherapies to reduce tumor burden. However, these chemotherapies can compromise lymphocyte function, thereby hindering normal anti-tumor immune responses and likely limiting the efficacy of subsequent immunotherapy. To better understand these negative impacts, we assessed the immunological effects of standard-of-care AML therapies on lymphocyte phenotype and function over time. When compared to healthy donors, untreated AML patients showed evidence of lymphocyte activation and exhaustion and had more prevalent CD57+NKG2C+ adaptive NK cells, which was independent of human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) status. HMA/venetoclax treatment resulted in a greater fraction of T cells with effector memory phenotype, inhibited IFN-γ secretion by CD8+ T cells, upregulated perforin expression in NK cells, downregulated PD-1 and 2B4 expression on CD4+ T cells, and stimulated Treg proliferation and CTLA-4 expression. Additionally, we showed increased expression of perforin and CD39 and enhanced IFN-γ production by T cells from pre-treatment blood samples of venetoclax-resistant AML patients. Our results provide insight into the lymphocyte status in previously untreated AML patients and the effects of standard-of-care treatments on their biology and functions. We also found novel pre-treatment characteristics of T cells that could potentially predict venetoclax resistance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is heterogeneous myeloid disorder with multifactorial pathogenic mechanisms and a broad range of prognosis. AML is characterized by clonal proliferation of poorly differentiated cells of the myeloid lineage. Objective: This study aimed to detect Isocitrate Dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) mutation in adult Egyptian AML patients and to find correlation between the mutation and prognosis & survival in those patients after intensive chemotherapy. Patients and Methods: Our study included 98 subjects with newly diagnosed AML. They all presented to Ain Shams University Hospital (Hematology Unit). All Patients included in the study were subjected to: History taking and clinical examination, laboratory investigations including routine investigations and cytogenetic studies for detection of IDH 1 mutation. All patients were followed up for their response to treatment for a period of 6 months. Results: IDH1 mutation occurs in a considerable percentage of Egyptian AML patients that shows independent bad prognostic impact on the clinical outcome. Conclusion: IDH1 mutation occurred in a considerable percentage of Egyptian AML patients that showed independent bad prognostic impact on the clinical outcome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We analyzed 526 consecutive acute myeloid leukemia patients refractory to or relapsing after chemotherapy. 270 patients received intensive salvage chemotherapy (IC), 97 azacitidine (AZA) and 159 best supportive care (BSC). Complete response was obtained in 37/19/0% (p =.0008). Allogeneic stem-cell transplantation (alloSCT) was performed in 39.3/10.3/0%. Median overall survival (OS) and 5-year OS were 8.2/9.6/2.2 months and 16/6/2% (p <.0001). Predictive factors of worse OS were post-myelodysplastic/chronic myelomonocytic leukemia, bone marrow blasts ≥20%, adverse cytogenetics, AZA cycle ≥2 and no alloSCT at R/R for AZA and age, performance status, white blood cell count and myelodysplasia-related changes for IC. The impact of treatment was time-dependent: adjusted hazard ratio for OS was in favor of AZA up to 1 month, was not different between 1 and 7 months, then was in favor of IC after 7 months. While AZA represents a therapeutic option for the oldest patients, it does not lead to long-term survivors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction. The standard intensive chemotherapy in acute leukemia patients will cause severe neutropenia and infection (febrile neutropenia) with high fatality rate. The availability of accurate data on causative pathogens is essential to the appropriate selection of empirical therapy and usually obtained from bacterial surveillance. This study was intended to evaluate bacterial pathogens found on surveillance and during febrile neutropenia in acute leukemia patients undergoing chemotherapy at Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital and to provide information for antimicrobial policy in the hospital. Methods. A retrospective study from data of bacterial surveillance of acute leukemia patients undergoing chemotherapy during 2008-2010 in isolation room for acute leukemia patients at 8th floor of ‘Gedung A’ Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta. The isolates for surveillance data were obtained from cultures from feces culture, nasal and throat swab, preputium swab and other sites (urine, sputum, skin infection - as indicated) from acute leukemia patients before and during intensive chemotherapy. Blood sample for blood culture was collected from central venous catheter and peripheral veins using BactecÒduring febrile neutropenia, and the other specimens (swab, urine, feces cultures) were collected according to the standard laboratory procedure. All specimens were collected by nurses in isolation room and bacterial cultures were performed at microbiology division of Clinical Pathology Department Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital. Results. There were 1,127 isolates of acute leukemia patients (acute myeloid leukemia - AML or acute lymphocytic leukemia - ALL) that could be analyzed. Gram positive bacteria was significantly higher than gram negative bacteria from all cultures, from respiratory tract (514 out of 675 isolates; 76.1%) and blood culture (Staphylococcus epidermidis and Streptococcus anhemolyticus – 81 out of 103 isolates; 78.7%). Regarding bacterial surveillance in colon, only 8 out of 45 E. coli isolates from feces can be analyzed for sensitivity to ciprofloxacin/cotrimoxazole and the other 37 isolates were sensitive to other antimicrobials that not commonly used for gut decontamination in acute leukemia. The sensitivity pattern of the other isolates could not be analyzed to the antibiotics recommended for the management of febrile neutropenia due to wide range of antibiotics tested. Conclusion. From 1,127 isolates found among acute leukemia patients undergoing intensive chemotherapy at Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, it was found that gram positive was the most common bacteria found on upper respiratory tract from bacterial surveillance and from blood culture during febrile neutropenia.

Background. The use of modern induction chemotherapy programs for primary Hodgkin’s lymphoma allows achievement of high long-term outcomes even in patients with initially poor prognosis. However, the toxicity of treatment is quite high. Despite the effectiveness of chemotherapy, the frequency of relapses and resistant forms varies from 20 to 30 %. In extremely rare cases, the use of intensive chemotherapy regimens, including high-dose chemotherapy, leads to long-term remissions.Description of the clinical case. We present a case of advanced-stage Hodgkin’s lymphoma in a young patient with symptoms of intoxication and adverse risk factors, such as: massive lesion in the mediastinum, increased ES R, infiltration of soft tissues, pleura, pericardium, multiple lesions of both lungs, damage to more than 3 areas of the lymphatic collectors. Given all these factors, the disease prognosis was extremely unfavorable, with a low probability of achieving remission and a high risk of early progression. The use of the intensive EACOPP -14 program allowed the achievement of short-term partial remission. Due to poor treatment tolerance, but taking into account the achievement of a partial response, further treatment was continued using the ABVD chemotherapy regimen. Follow-up examination revealed disease progression. Further courses of chemotherapy using various combinations of chemotherapy drugs resulted in a short-term positive effect with subsequent disease progression. Considering the fact that the disease was resistant to most basic chemotherapeutic agents, immunotherapy with nivolumab (PD -1 inhibitor) was administered. This alternative treatment method allowed the disease to be stabilized.Conclusion. The use of the immunological drug in a patient with chemoresistant Hodgkin’s lymphoma made it possible to stop the progression of the disease and to improve the patient’s quality of life, without significant infectious complications and adverse events.

Value of bone marrow biopsy in Hodgkin lymphoma patients staged by FDG PET: results from the German Hodgkin Study Group trials HD16, HD17, and HD18. Keywords: bone marrow involvement; Hodgkin lymphoma; intensive chemotherapy; positron emission tomography; prognosis EN bone marrow involvement Hodgkin lymphoma intensive chemotherapy positron emission tomography prognosis e5 e8 4 03/30/22 20220401 NES 220401 Newly diagnosed advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) has become a curable malignancy in the vast majority of patients.1,2 With response-adapted treatment comprising four or six cycles of bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (BEACOPP) in escalated dose (eBEACOPP), outstanding cure rates are achieved through a comparatively short and safe treatment approach.3,4 Around 5 to 15% of HL patients present with bone marrow (BM) involvement, as assessed by conventional biopsy.5-7 According to the Ann Arbor classification, BM involvement reflects a high tumour burden and therefore defines stage IV disease.8 Positron emission tomography (PET) using SP 18 sp F-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (FDG) has demonstrated superior sensitivity compared to BM biopsy.9-11 In paediatric advanced HL, only individuals showing three or more BM lesions were assumed to be at higher risk for progression or relapse.12 Yet, there are insufficient data available to establish whether this also holds true for adult patients receiving intensive first-line treatment. PET imaging was shown to identify BM lesions at a higher sensitivity than biopsy of the iliac bone and has become part of diagnostic work-up in most countries.15 Current study protocols no longer recommend BM biopsy in PET-negative individuals. [Extracted from the article]

Locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) represents a major urgency in oncology. Due to the massive involvement of the peripancreatic vessels, a curative-intent surgery is generally precluded. Historically, LAPC has been an indication for palliative systemic therapy. In recent years, with the introduction of intensive multi-agent chemotherapy regimens and aggressive surgical approaches, the survival of LAPC patients has significantly improved. In this complex and rapidly evolving scenario, the role of radiotherapy is still debated. The use of standard-dose conventional fractionated radiotherapy in LAPC has led to unsatisfactory oncological outcomes. However, technological advances in radiation therapy over recent years have definitively changed this paradigm. The use of ablative doses of radiotherapy, in association with image-guidance, respiratory organ-motion management, and adaptive protocols, has led to unprecedented results in terms of local control and survival. In this overview, principles, clinical applications, and current pitfalls of ablative radiotherapy (ART) as an emerging treatment option for LAPC are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The frequency of thrombosis in AML has been evaluated only in a few studies and no validated predictive model is currently available. Recently, DIC score was shown to identify patients at higher thrombotic risk. We aimed to evaluate the frequency of thromboembolism in AML patients treated with intensive chemotherapy and to assess the ability of genetic and clinical factors to predict the thrombotic risk. We performed a retrospective observational study including 222 newly diagnosed adult AML (210) and high-risk MDS (12), treated with intensive chemotherapy between January 2013 and February 2020. With a median follow-up of 44 months, we observed 50 thrombotic events (90% were venous, VTE). The prevalence of thrombosis was 22.1% and the 6-months cumulative incidence of thrombosis was 10%. The median time to thrombosis was 84 days and 52% of the events occurred within 100 days from AML diagnosis. Khorana and DIC score failed to stratify patients according to their thrombotic risk. Only history of a thrombotic event (p = 0.043), particularly VTE (p = 0.0053), platelet count above 100 × 109/L at diagnosis (p = 0.036) and active smoking (p = 0.025) significantly and independently increased the risk of thrombosis, the latter particularly of arterial events. AML genetic profile did not affect thrombosis occurrence. Results were confirmed considering only thromboses occurring within day 100 from diagnosis. DIC score at diagnosis, but not thrombosis, was independently associated with reduced survival (p = 0.004). Previous VTE, platelet count above 100 × 109/L and active smoking were the only factors associate with increased thrombotic risk in AML patients treated intensively, but further studies are needed to validate these results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Despite advances in supportive measures, acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remission induction still has a high mortality rate in real-world studies as compared to prospective reports. We analyzed data from 206 AML adult patients treated with conventional chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was the 60-day mortality rate, aiming to find risk factors and to examine the role of anti-infection prophylaxis. The 60-day mortality rate was 26%, raising to 41% among those older than 60 years. Complete response was documented at the end of induction in 49%. The final survival model showed that age > 60 years (HR 3.2), Gram-negative colonization (HR 3), monocytic AML (HR 1.8), C-reactive protein (CRP) > 15 mg/dL (HR 10), and an adverse risk in the genetic stratification (HR 3) were associated with induction death. Multidrug-resistant bacteria colonization, thrombosis, and AKI were documented in 71%, 12%, and 66% of the cohort, respectively. Antibacterial and antifungal prophylaxis did not improve outcomes in this study. Our report corroborated the higher mortality during AML induction compared to real-world data from the USA and Europe. In line with other publications, age and cytogenetic stratification influenced early death in this cohort. Noticeably, Gram-negative colonization, monocytic AML, and CRP were also significant to early mortality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has poor outcomes. Although lower-intensity venetoclax-containing regimens are standard for older/unfit patients with newly diagnosed AML, it is unknown how such regimens compare with intensive chemotherapy (IC) for R/R AML.Methods: Outcomes of R/R AML treated with 10-day decitabine and venetoclax (DEC10-VEN) were compared with IC-based regimens including idarubicin with cytarabine, with or without cladribine, clofarabine, or fludarabine, with or without additional agents. Propensity scores derived from patient baseline characteristics were used to match DEC10-VEN and IC patients to minimize bias.Results: Sixty-five patients in the DEC10-VEN cohort were matched to 130 IC recipients. The median ages for the DEC10-VEN and IC groups were 64 and 58 years, respectively, and baseline characteristics were balanced between the 2 cohorts. DEC10-VEN conferred significantly higher responses compared with IC including higher overall response rate (60% vs 36%; odds ratio [OR], 3.28; P < .001), complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi, 19% vs 6%; OR, 3.56; P = .012), minimal residual disease negativity by flow cytometry (28% vs 13%; OR, 2.48; P = .017), and lower rates of refractory disease. DEC10-VEN led to significantly longer median event-free survival compared with IC (5.7 vs 1.5 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.46; 95% CI, 0.30-0.70; P < .001), as well as median overall survival (OS; 6.8 vs 4.7 months; HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.37-0.86; P = .008). DEC10-VEN was independently associated with improved OS compared with IC in multivariate analysis. Exploratory analysis for OS in 27 subgroups showed that DEC10-VEN was comparable with IC as salvage therapy for R/R AML.Conclusion: DEC10-VEN represents an appropriate salvage therapy and may offer better responses and survival compared with IC in adults with R/R AML. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract A recent phase 3 trial showed that outcome of older patients with secondary acute myeloid leukemia (AML) may be improved by a liposomal encapsulation of cytarabine and daunorubicin (CPX‐351). This phase 3 study represents a unique example of prospective data in this rare subgroup providing basis for comparison with real life data. Here, we retrospectively assessed characteristics and outcome of patients aged 60‐75 years with secondary or therapy‐related AML in real life. Out of 218 patients that fulfilled CPX‐351 study criteria, 181 patients (83.0%) received antileukemic treatment either intensive chemotherapy (n = 121) or hypomethylating agents (HMA, n = 60). As compared with patients treated by chemotherapy, HMA‐treated patients were older, had lower WBC, more often AML with antecedent myelodysplastic syndrome and adverse cytogenetic risk. In chemotherapy‐treated patients, the complete response rate was 69%, median overall survival (OS) was 11 months whereas 3‐year and 5‐year OS was 21% and 17%, respectively. In HMA‐treated patients, the complete response rate was 15%, median OS was 11 months whereas 3‐year and 5‐year OS was 15% and 2%, respectively. In conclusion, although outcome of older patients with high‐risk AML is very poor, a significant proportion of patients treated by standard intensive chemotherapy but not HMA are long‐term survivors.

Résumé: La chimiothérapie intensive est le traitement de référence de la leucémie aiguë myéloïde. La sélection des patients âgés pouvant en bénéficier s'est améliorée ces dernières années, et la gestion de la chimiothérapie intensive a permis à plus de patients d'accéder à ce traitement permettant également une augmentation de l'accès à l'allogreffe de cellules souches hématopoïétiques. Le développement se fait majoritairement grâce aux groupes coopérateurs français (Acute Leukemia French Association et French Innovative Leukemia Organization) et à des études académiques permettant d'améliorer les stratégies thérapeutiques en intégrant de nouvelles thérapeutiques. Cette revue fait le point sur les standards actuels et les perspectives futures pour la chimiothérapie intensive dans la leucémie aiguë myéloïde. Intensive chemotherapy is the standard treatment for acute myeloid leukemia. The selection of elderly patients who can benefit from this treatment has improved in recent years and the management of intensive chemotherapy has allowed more patients to access this treatment also allowing an increase in access to allogeneic cell transplantation. hematopoietic strains. Development is mainly carried out thanks to the French cooperative groups (ALFA and FILO) and thanks to academic studies making it possible to improve therapeutic strategies by integrating new therapies. This review provides an update on current standards and future prospects for intensive chemotherapy in acute myeloid leukemia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Older acute myeloid leukemia patients usually experience a bleak outcome, especially those in the unfit group. For this unfit category, intensive chemotherapy and allogeneic stem cell transplantation are usually accompanied by higher early mortality, which results from higher risk genetic profiles and worse psychological and physiological conditions. The significant improvement in genetic technology recently has driven the appearance of several mutation-targeted therapies, such as FLT3, Bcl-2, IDH and Hedgehog pathway inhibitors and an anti-CD33 antibody-drug conjugate, which have changed enormously the therapeutic landscape of acute myeloid leukemia. This review describes the treatment dilemma of the unfit group and discusses the objective clinical data of each targeted drug and mechanisms of resistance, with a focus on combination strategies with fewer toxicities and abrogation of drug resistance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The treatment outcomes for Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ALL) have improved with various tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and bispecific T-cell engagers. Although allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) is the standard treatment for young patients with Ph+ALL, its role remains debatable in the era of TKIs and blinatumomab., Areas Covered: There are some issues regarding Ph+ALL. First, do young patients require intensive chemotherapy (IC) in the era of multitarget agents? Second, which TKI is preferred for frontline therapy? Third, should allo-SCT be performed in patients achieving complete remission with ponatinib and IC? Fourth, can chemo-free treatment lead to a cure without allo-SCT? We searched relevant literature from the last 30 years on PubMed; reviewed the role of chemo-free therapies and combinations of ponatinib and IC; and assessed the necessity of allo-SCT in young patients with Ph+ALL., Expert Opinion: Allo-SCT may not be needed, even in young patients with Ph+ALL treated with ponatinib-based IC or combined ponatinib and blinatumomab as frontline therapy. When adopting a ponatinib-based chemo-minimized regimen for induction, allo-SCT is needed with posttransplant ponatinib maintenance. Continuous exposure to ponatinib at pre- or post-transplant is regarded as one of the most important factor for the success of treatment.

Anna Forsythe,1 Christina S Kwon,1 Timothy Bell,2 T Alexander Smith,3 Bhakti Arondekar4 1Purple Squirrel Economics, New York, NY, USA; 2Pfizer Inc, New York, NY, USA; 3Pfizer Ltd, Walton Oaks, UK; 4Pfizer Inc, Collegeville, PA, USA Background: AML is a rapidly progressing bone marrow cancer, with poor survival rates compared to other types of leukemia. IC and NIC as well as BSC treatment options are available; however, there is scant published literature on the impact of disease and treatment on the HRQoL in patients receiving NIC.Aim: This study determined the HRQoL among NIC AML patients.Materials and methods: Embase, Medline, Cochrane database, and conference abstracts were searched using the prespecified PICOS criteria from January 2000 to November 2017 for studies reporting HRQoL and patient preference utilities in NIC AML. Studies on patients with RAEB-t MDS, randomized clinical trials (RCTs), prospective observational studies, and patient surveys were included, while systematic reviews and meta-analyses were used for bibliographic searching.Results: Thirteen records from 12 original studies were identified. These included five records from four RCTs, three prospective studies, four patient survey studies, and one cost-effectiveness analysis. At baseline, NIC AML patients had poor HRQoL scores especially in fatigue (33) and GHS (50) on a 0–100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health. Low baseline HRQoL scores, especially PF and fatigue (

Summary: After decades when intensive chemotherapy remained the only effective anti‐acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) treatment, a torrent of novel, less toxic agents are about to revolutionise AML therapy. Prolonged remissions with good quality of life become achievable for many patients previously considered only for palliative care because they could not tolerate intensive therapy. As treatment options multiply, the importance of genetic profile is recognised, even for advanced‐age patients for whom cure is unlikely. With lack of randomised comparative trials for most treatment regimens, one can only extrapolate data from existing studies to make evidence‐based decisions. We herein present seven common clinical scenarios illustrating the complexity of treating older AML patients and describe our approach to their management. In each case, up‐to‐date data on relevant agents to be offered to a particular patient are discussed. The current review is limited to the drugs, available and approved in the Western world and many promising agents, still under investigation, are not discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The majority of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are aged 70 and over. However, there is uncertainty about how and whether older patients with AML should receive cytotoxic treatment. Medline and Cochrane library search was performed for studies in newly diagnosed AML which enrolled at least 20 patients per arm (for randomized controlled trials), or 50 patients (for non-randomized studies) over the age of 70. References were hand searched for additional eligible studies. Study investigators were contacted to maximize relevant data. Dual independent data extraction was done using standardized data collection forms. Data was collected on study and treatment characteristics, baseline patient information, and outcomes. Study methodological quality was assessed. The primary outcome was 1 year overall survival (OS). Impact of treatment [intensive chemotherapy (INT), low-dose chemotherapy (LOW), hypomethylating agents (HMA), or best supportive care (BSC)], cytogenetics, performance status, and comorbidity were assessed. The search produced 11,846 references of which 38 randomized controlled trials and 30 non-randomized studies met inclusion criteria, representing 13,381 patients, with a worldwide distribution. One-year OS with INT was 37% (31–42%), with LOW 11% (6–18%), with HMA 35% (18–54%) and with BSC 17%(13–21%). Two-year OS was 22% (18–26%), 11% (7–15%), 22% (16–28%), 6% (2–12%), respectively. We present subgroup data based on the studies including cytogenetics, performance status, and comorbidity. Formal direct comparisons with adjustment for all prognostic factors were not possible. In this largest to date series of AML patients aged 70 and older, we provide benchmarks for treatment efficacy and effectiveness that may be used for decision analysis models and for the future development of clinical trials focusing on these patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are usually treated with intensive chemotherapy, leading to prolonged bone marrow aplasia. It is usually assumed that a short duration of aplasia could be a surrogate marker of poor therapeutic efficacy in clearing bone marrow blasts, especially in older patients. No studies have evaluated the usefulness of such a surrogate marker in younger AML patients treated with intensive chemotherapy. Materials and Methods: In the present study, we retrospectively assessed the role of white blood cell (WBC) count nadir and duration of aplasia in 68 patients with AML treated with intensive chemotherapy and potentially candidate to stem cell transplantation. Results: The median (interquartile range) bone marrow aplasia was 25 days, and the mean WBC count nadir from chemotherapy start was at day +12, whereas the median neutrophil recovery occurred at day +24. No significant differences were found between responders and nonresponders for mean aplasia duration (25 vs. 26 days, p value = 0.76), mean WBC count nadir (12 vs. 12 days, p value = 0.86), and median neutrophil recovery (24 vs. 24, p value = 0.67). Discussion: The present study evaluated the potential prognostic role of WBC count nadir and duration of aplasia, demonstrating that they are not associated with treatment outcomes in adult patients with AML treated with intensive chemotherapy. Therefore, a short duration of aplasia seems not linked to poor therapeutic efficacy in clearing bone marrow blasts. Our findings, although needing validation in larger and more homogeneous cohorts, may offer helpful clues in the management of aplasia of AML patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In a meta-analysis of 5 trials, the addition of gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) to intensive induction chemotherapy led to a survival benefit in patients with core-binding factor (CBF) acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Given the heterogeneous incorporation of GO in clinical trials, the ideal dose and schedule remains unclear. We conducted a single-center retrospective analysis to compare outcomes of patients with CBF-AML treated with intensive induction chemotherapy, with or without a single dose of GO 3 mg/m2, during induction only. We included 87 patients (GO=32, control=55). The composite complete remission (cCR) rate was higher in the control group (93%) compared to the GO group (82%) (p<0.001). The rate of measurable residual disease (MRD) negative cCR, by flow cytometry, was similar between both groups. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of toxicity. The 3-year relapse-free survival (RFS) for both groups was similar (71% vs 68%, p=0.5). The 3-year overall survival (OS) for the GO group was 68%, compared to 66% for the control group (p=0.9).In multivariable analysis, age and MRD positive status were risk factors for inferior outcomes. We find that survival of patients with CBF-AML is favorable in the real-world setting. The addition of single-dose GO, during induction, did not lead to a higher remission rate or survival benefit, when compared to intensive chemotherapy without GO. Further investigation into the incorporation of GO in the treatment algorithm for CBF-AML is needed. • A single-dose of GO plus 7+3 did not improve outcomes, compared to 7+3 alone. • Outcomes of CBF-AML appear to be relatively favorable in real-world studies. • Post-consolidation MRD predicts for inferior outcomes in CBF-AML. • Increasing age predicts for inferior outcomes in CBF-AML. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]