Search

本調査は、テキストマイニング手法を用いて15大学969名の日本語・日本文化研修留学生(日研生)の修了研究テーマを分析することを通して、日研生の日本探究の切り口、関心を持つ学問分野及び日本研究へのアプローチを明らかにすることを目的としたものである。高頻出語、共起ネットワーク、関連語、コロケーション統計や2成分間の対応分析を基に修了研究テーマを解析した結果、日研生が取り組む主要研究分野として日本語、日本社会、日本文化、文学、教育が抽出された。日本語研究は、表現を対象に行われることが多く、アプローチとして母国語との対照研究が多いことが窺われた。更に、とりわけ身近なやは日本を探究する主たる切り口となっており、それらに対する日研生の研究方法として意識調査が頻繁に用いられることも示された。その上、修了研究テーマにおける一つのトレンドとしてが浮かび上がってきた。本調査では、更に、国籍別、論文作成年度別、在籍大学別の特徴についても考察した。, This study aims to reveal trends, approaches, and areas of interests of MEXT Japanese Studies scholars, by the way of analyzing their completion research titles using text mining analytics. The target of the survey consists of 969 research topics of Japanese Studies Students who were studying in 15 universities in Japan during 2009 to 2020. Through analysis of frequency words, co-occurrence networks, related words and by applying collocation statistics and binary correspondence analysis we revealed that the main areas of research interests of Japanese Studies Students were Japanese language, society, culture, literature, and education. Most often Japanese language studies were carried out as comparative research between Japanese language and the mother-tongue of the researcher having linguistic expressions as the target. Another frequently appearing research style was awareness surveys conducted especially to young Japanese such as university students. Females, their images and status in society, translations and dialects were also in trend as research topics. Furthermore, we analyzed how the variants such as nationality, the year when the research was carried out, and the affiliated university correlated with the frequency words., 本報告は2021年11月19日に大阪大学で行われた「令和3年度日本語・日本文化研修留学生問題に関する検討会議」にて行った口頭発表を基に、データを大幅に補充し、発展させたものである。

This study aims to reveal trends, approaches, and areas of interests of MEXT Japanese Studies scholars, by the way of analyzing their completion research titles using text mining analytics. The target of the survey consists of 969 research topics of Japanese Studies Students who were studying in 15 universities in Japan during 2009 to 2020. Through analysis of frequency words, co-occurrence networks, related words and by applying collocation statistics and binary correspondence analysis we revealed that the main areas of research interests of Japanese Studies Students were Japanese language, society, culture, literature, and education. Most often Japanese language studies were carried out as comparative research between Japanese language and the mother-tongue of the researcher having linguistic expressions as the target. Another frequently appearing research style was awareness surveys conducted especially to young Japanese such as university students. Females, their images and status in society, translations and dialects were also in trend as research topics. Furthermore, we analyzed how the variants such as nationality, the year when the research was carried out, and the affiliated university correlated with the frequency words.

The recent development of the academic field of Japanese studies towards interdisciplinary cultural studies paradigm has been causing certain downfalls of traditional philological orientations within this area of scholarship. The aim of the present paper is to reflect on the tradition of Prague school’s functional-structuralist approach to language and text and present its application on contemporary Japanese studies programs. The functional-structuralist approach presented in the paper is based on the unified dichotomy of system (of signs) and texts (as sign formations), the latter being defined by the features of genre classification, situational binding and discourse tradition. The framework of ‘Encompassing philology’ applied to the field of Japanese studies aspires to fulfill the basic needs of a modern interdisciplinary orientation and at the same time strengthen the role of the Japanese language beyond the “tool for communication”., Ovaj rad uvodi intelektualni program tzv. „obuhvatne filologije“ u kontekst japanologije i japanskih studija kao znanstvenih disciplina. Prvo se analizira razvoj proučavanja japanskih stvari, ukazujući na specifičnost filološki orijentirane japanologije i modernih japanskih studija, posebno iz pozicije nastave japanskoga jezika. Zatim se predlaže objedinjavajući i 'obuhvatni' program funkcionalne lingvistike koji će se primijeniti na japanske studije kako bi se očuvale prednosti tradicionalnoga filološkog pristupa i suvremene interdisciplinarne metodologije. Obuhvatna filologija ima snažno semiološki pristup tekstu, gradeći apstraktni jezični sustav odozdo prema gore, ujedno uzimajući u obzir tri dimenzije konkretnosti teksta: situacijsko vezivanje, žanrovsku klasifikaciju i diskurzivnu tradiciju. TEKST, pisani i govoreni, smatra se formacijom jezičnoga znaka koji bi se trebao apstrahirati u deskriptivni jezični SUSTAV. Rad predstavlja i primjenu teorije o japanskome jeziku i sugerira da je japanologija kao primjer obuhvatne filologije održiv put za japanske studije u 21. stoljeću., 本稿は日本文化・社会を研究対象とする日本学・日本研究における日本語と日本語教育を再評価することを目的とする。プラーグ学派において盛んになった「包括的な文献学」という考え方を出発点にし，日本研究における日本語教育の重要性を指摘しつつ教育のための日本語の文法／構造の組み立て方の原理をテクストの観点から紹介する。その原理は，機能構造主義言語学の言語記号の把握を示唆に，言語構造を「場面との密着」「ジャンルの属性」「ディスコースの伝統」の三つの具体性に基づいたテクストか ら抽象化することと考えられる。本稿では，以上の理論を日本語に適用した 例を紹介し，21世紀においても包括的な文献学に基づいた日本学・日本研究が実行可能な研究分野になれると唱える。

Статья посвящена памяти выдающегося японоведа ХХ в., всемирно признанного ученого и педагога, основателя дальневосточного направления исследований в США, создателя научного японоведения во Франции, одного из первых русских японистов Сергея Григорьевича Елисеева (Serge Elisséeff) (1889–1957). Осенью 1920 г. С. Г. Елисеев, выходец из богатейшей купеческой семьи, эмигрировал из Советской России, поэтому в СССР он был почти неизвестен. Очень нескоро достижения бывших российских граждан в области науки, техники, искусства и литературы были признаны на их первой родине, а сами они стали ее гордостью. Единственная в мире научная конференция, посвященная научной судьбе ученого, прошла в Москве в 1999 г. Несмотря на многочисленные доклады специалистов, журналистов и даже людей, когда-то знавших Елисеева, выяснилось, что жизненный и профессиональный путь востоковеда нуждаются в глубоком и тщательном изучении. С этой целью автором статьи был произведен сбор документальных материалов из архивов и библиотек ряда стран мира, с которыми С. Г. Елисеев так или иначе был связан. На основе этих данных удалось восстановить научную биографию знаменитого японоведа. Был рассмотрен ранний период жизни Сергея Елисеева и причины формирования у него интереса к изучению Японии. Выявлены новые детали его обучения в Императорском Токийском университете, который Елисеев окончил в 1912 г. первым среди европейцев. Была прослежена карьера молодого ученого и преподавателя в 1915–1920 гг. в Петрограде, доказано значительное влияние профессионала Елисеева на развитие японоведения во Франции. Документы из архивов США полностью подтвердили основополагающую роль Сержа Елисеева в создании научно-педагогического направления дальневосточных исследований в Гарвардском университете и в США в целом. Его недюжинные организаторские способности полностью раскрылись в его руководстве Институтом Гарвард-Яньцзин по целому ряду направлений и в США, и в Китае, и в других азиатских странах. Показаны направления деятельности Елисеева в сотрудничестве со спецслужбами США во время Второй мировой войны, его роль в спасении Киото, Нара и Камакура от конвенциональных бомбардировок. Рассмотрен вклад ученого в распространение знаний о Японии, о японской ментальности в западном мире. В статье введен в научный оборот ряд новых источников., This article was written in commemoration of Serge Elisséeff (1889– 1975) – an outstanding 20th century Japanologist, the world-famous scholar and teacher, the founder of the school of Far Eastern studies in the USA, the organizer of academic Japanology in France, one of the first Russian Japanologists. In the autumn of 1920, he emigrated from the Soviet Russia, and was practically unknown in the USSR for this reason. The recognition of the achievements of Russian emigrants in the fields of academic science, engineering, art, and literature in their motherland, when they became its pride, required a lot of time. The only international conference devoted to Elisséeff’s academic path was held in Moscow in 1999. A series of reports was presented by academicians, journalists, and persons who had known Serge Elisséeff personally. Nevertheless, it became evident that his personal and professional life still needs further profound study. For this purpose, the author collected many new documents in various archives and libraries of the countries somehow linked to Serge Elisséeff’s life. They formed a base for reconstructing the prominent scholar’s academic biography. The author reveals the early period of his life and the reasons for his interest in Japanese studies, and introduces some new details of his study at the Imperial Tokyo University (he graduated in 1912 as the first European graduate). The paper examines the Petrograd period of Elisséeff’s career in 1915–1920, when he was a young scholar and professor, and proves his considerable professional contribution to the French Japanology. Serge Elisséeff’s fundamental contribution as the organizer of Far Eastern studies at Harvard and the U.S. in general was fully confirmed by the American archive documents. His extraordinary administrative abilities were revealed during his tenure as the Director of the Harvard-Yenching Institute, when he fulfilled a number of activities at Harvard, in China, and in other Asian countries. The paper considers Elisséeff’s cooperation with the U.S. Secret Services during World War II, and shows his role in saving Kyoto, Nara, and Kamakura. The article also introduces Elisséeff’s accomplishments in spreading the Japanological expertise and the knowledge of Japanese mentality in the West. A number of new scholarly archive sources are put in scientific circulation.

Hrvatska japanologija duguje neizmjerno mnogo akademiku profesoru Vladimiru Devidéu. Matematičar po zvanju, Devidé je bio istinski zaljubljenik u Japan i neumorni promicatelj japanske kulture u Hrvatskoj i regiji. Održao je preko 200 japanoloških predavanja te napisao dvadesetak knjiga od kojih je, za japanologiju možda najznačajnija Iz japanske književnosti (1985.), jedina antologija japanske književnosti na hrvatskome jeziku i hrvatskoga autora. Izbor tekstova uvrštenih u antologiju odražava mainstream u dijakronijskim prikazima važnih autora japanske kulturne i književne povijesti, no ova je knjiga, kao i šira Devidéova japanološka ostavština, ujedno i refleksija zanimanja za Japan kakvo je prednjačilo u „zapadnome“ svijetu pedesetih, šezdesetih i sedamdesetih godina prošloga stoljeća. Devidé je u tome smislu svjedok svojega vremena, on opisuje Japan onako kako je to činila većina vodećih svjetskih japanologa spomenutoga razdoblja. Cilj je ovoga rada predstaviti dio Devidéova nasljeđa u kontekstu trendova u japanologiji u posljednjih nekoliko desetljeća., Croatian Japanology owes much to academician and professor Vladimir Devidé. Although he was a mathematician by profession, his name in Croatia is inevitably associated to Japan and Japanese culture. Devidé was tireless in his promotion of Japan in Croatia, holding more than 200 public lectures on Japan and its culture. He also wrote some of the first books on Japanology in Croatian, such as the first and, for now, only anthology of Japanese literature (From Japanese Literature, 1985). The choice of literary works listed in his anthology reflects the mainstream in diachronic representations of the most important authors in Japanese cultural and literature history. It also reflects, however, the kind of interest in Japan which was rather popular in the “western” world of the sixties and the seventies of the past century. In this sense, Devidé is a witness of his time, he writes and describes Japan in a way similar to some of the most popular Japanologists of the aforementioned decades. My aim is to present part of Devidé’s legacy in the context of changing trends in Japanese studies in past few decades.

This paper will give an overview of the ways Devide represented Japan in Croatia, pointing out that his descriptions belong to nihonjinron theories.

本稿の目的は、19-20 世紀の世紀転換期における日本に関するイギリス人とポルトガル人のディスクール（言説）を簡潔に比較検討することにある。当時、イギリスとポルトガルは、歴史上、正反対の時期にあり、そのため、外交官にせよ、文学者にせよ、日本に関する両者のディスクールには相異が生じた。本稿では、筆者は、イギリス人の外交官アーネスト・メイソン・サトウ(1843-1929)、日本学者バジル・ホール・チェンバレン(1850-1935)、およびポルトガルの外交官・作家ヴェンセスラウ・デ・モラエス(1854-1929) の目を通して見た日本の近代化に焦点を当て、考察を加えた。

Ezra F. Vogel’s Japan as Number One augured the high tide of Japan and Japanology. Subtitled “Lessons for America,” the 1979 book preceded the property and share price bubble of the 1980s that seemed to make Japan the largest and most dynamic economy in the world. Vogel’s conspectus of Japanese society delineated a well-functioning, nearly ideal society: excellent schools, good labor relations, capable bureaucrats, and much more. Indeed, many American business people and policymakers heeded “lessons” from Japan, whether the idea of kaizen [improvement] or industrial policy. American students flocked to Japanese language classes; the future of Japan Studies appeared rosy indeed. Vogel’s book tickled Japanese national pride and went on to sell over 700,000 copies, making it the bestselling social science book of all time in Japan...

書評論文, Hamaguchi Eshun is regarded as one of the most influential academics who has spoken about Japanese society and culture. His most famous proposition is kanjinshugi (contextualism), which was presented in the 1980s. While his ideas were evaluated highly by many, some questions and doubts have also been expressed. This paper takes the latter position and criticizes Hamaguchi's idea from four aspects, which provide a significant problem consciousness in the discussion of Japanology, especially as the validity of the so-called Japanese system is under serious exmamination these days., 濱口恵俊は、日本文化について、現在最も活発に発言をしている研究者のひとりだが、彼のキーアイディアは、『間人主義』である。80年代に提出されて以来、多くの論者が、その概念としての意義を高く評価する一方、同概念に疑念を挟む議論も少なからず展開されてきた。本論では、後者の視点に立ち、当時あまり顧みられなかった論評を紹介しつつ、今なお有効とされる、濱口の概念を4つの角度から批判する。ひいてはそれが、日本型システムの再考を求められている現在、日本型システムそのものが真に存在したのかという『問い』への、答えを提供する糸口に繋がると考えるからである。

[ES]Se ofrece un modelo de lectura del Man'yoshu, partiendo de la contextualidad de esta obra como algo más o diferente a una simple antología antigua de poemas. Para ello se dan unas claves de lectura que incorporan el legado crítico sobre esta obra, pero se insiste en aspectos descuidados por los historiadores literarios, como su carácter marcadamente ritual.