Search

Background: Differences in the physical characteristics of bilateral and unilateral lumbar bone stress injuries (BSIs) are unknown. Purpose: To compare bilateral and unilateral lumbar BSIs in adolescent male soccer players, with a focus on lumbopelvic alignment. Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A total of 78 players (age range, 12-15 years) from a local soccer club who had magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluations were included in the study. Lumbopelvic alignment and lumbar BSI were evaluated using short-tau inversion recovery and 3-dimensional LAVA on 3-T MRI; lumbar BSI was defined as the presence of bone marrow edema and/or the complete and incomplete fracture in the pars region on the MRI. Pelvic tilt (PT) and pelvic outflare angles were assessed on the kicking and pivoting sides, and asymmetry for each parameter was calculated by subtracting the kicking side from the pivoting side. In addition, the lumbar lordosis (LL), sacral slope (SS), and SS relative to LL (calculated by subtracting LL from the SS) were assessed. One-way analysis of variance was performed to compare lumbopelvic alignment in players with bilateral BSI, unilateral BSI, or no abnormal findings (controls). Results: No significant differences were found regarding lumbopelvic alignment between the players with bilateral versus unilateral lumbar BSI. PT asymmetry was significantly greater in both players with bilateral lumbar BSI and unilateral lumbar BSI compared with controls (P =.018 and P =.016, respectively). In addition, SS relative to LL was significantly greater in players with bilateral lumbar BSI compared with controls (P <.001). Conclusion: Although there were no significant lumbopelvic alignment differences between bilateral and unilateral BSI, players with bilateral BSI exhibited increased sacral anterior tilt relative to the LL, and the pelvis was more posterior on the pivoting side than on the kicking side in both players with bilateral BSI and unilateral BSI. Our results suggest that lumbopelvic alignment assessment may contribute to the management strategy for players with lumbar BSI and to the identification of players at high risk of lumbar BSI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To identify predictive risk factors of lumbar stress (LS) fracture developing from an asymptomatic stress reaction of the pedicle among adolescent male soccer players. Design: Prospective cohort study. Setting: Amateur Japanese adolescent male soccer team. Participants: Japanese adolescent male soccer players (n = 195) aged 12 to 13 years. Assessment of Risk Factors (Independent Variables): Height, body weight, body mass index, muscle tightness of both lower extremities (iliopsoas, hamstrings, and quadriceps), lumbar bone mineral content, developmental age, and lumbar lordosis angle were measured as baseline measurements. Main Outcome Measures (Dependent Variable): Players who were diagnosed with an asymptomatic stress reaction of the lumbar spine pedicle at baseline were followed; extension-based lumbar pain was defined 1 year after the baseline. The players were assigned to the LS fracture or control (CON) group at follow-up. Results: At baseline, 40 boys were diagnosed with an asymptomatic stress reaction of the lumbar spine pedicle. The difference in muscle tightness between the kicking leg and supporting leg was significantly different (P = 0.012) between the LS (n = 16) and CON (n = 22) groups. Increase in iliopsoas muscle tightness in the kicking leg was a predictive risk factor of developing extension-based lumbar pain after adjusting for developmental age and body mass index (odds ratio, 1.54; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-2.27). Conclusions: Development of extension-based lumbar pain from an asymptomatic stress reaction of the pedicle among adolescent male soccer players was associated with increased iliopsoas muscle tightness of the kicking leg relative to that of the supporting leg. Clinical Relevance [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Bone responds to mechanical loading by increasing bone mineral density (BMD) and/or bone area to enhance bone strength at the site of the greatest strain. Such localised adaptation has not been demonstrated at the spine. The aim of this study is to determine if BMD and/or bone mineral content (BMC) differs between dominant (ipsilateral to bowling/throwing arm) and non-dominant sides of the vertebrae in cricket fast bowlers, and whether this asymmetry differs according to stress fracture or disc injury history. A further aim was to determine if regional BMD and BMC in the lumbar spine differ between fast bowlers, other cricketers, rugby players and non-active controls, to highlight the site-specific response of lumbar vertebra to unilateral activity. 23 fast bowlers, 14 other cricketers, 22 rugby players and 20 controls underwent an antero-posterior (AP) and lateral DXA scans of their lumbar spine to assess BMD, BMC and area. A custom analysis measured BMD and BMC of the dominant and non-dominant sides (lateral 33%) of the AP lumbar spine. BMD and BMC were compared between groups, injury status, vertebrae and sides using ANOVA. Analysis of medical records showed that 6 fast bowlers had a history of lumbar stress fracture. Significantly greater BMD and BMC was found in the L4 non-dominant vertebra compared with the dominant vertebra in fast bowlers. BMD and BMC differed significantly according to vertebra, side and group, with fast bowlers having significantly greater BMD and BMC at the L3 and L4 non-dominant vertebra compared with other groups (L3: 13.3%–45.3%, L4: 15.7%–44.0%) compared with other groups. Fast bowlers who never suffered lumbar stress fracture had 3.6% and 1.7% greater BMD in the dominant and non-dominant sides of lumbar vertebrae respectively compared with those who did suffer lumbar stress fracture, but evidence of this was weaker (P = 0.08). The lumbar spine responds to a unique unilateral high loading activity through site-specific increased bone mass at the site of most strain. Fast bowlers had increased lumbar BMD, particularly on the non-dominant side of L4, although this adaptation was less marked in those with history of lumbar stress fracture. Site-specific low bone mineral density within the lumbar side may be implicated in the aetiology of lumbar stress fracture. • Cricket fast bowlers have greater BMD and BMC at the non-dominant (contralateral to bowling arm) side of the lumbar spine • This asymmetry increases in magnitude caudally, significantly differing to the dominant side at L4 • Fast bowlers have significantly greater BMD and BMC than rugby players at the non-dominant side of L2, L3 and L4 only • Reduced site-specific bone mineral accrual may be a risk factor to lumbar stress fracture in fast bowlers [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Context: Cricket is a popular global sport that requires a combination of physical fitness, skill, and strategy. Although a noncontact sport, overuse and impact injuries are common since players engage in a wide range of physical activities, including running, throwing, batting, bowling, catching, and diving. Significant or match time-loss injuries are defined as those that either prevent a player from being fully available for selection in a major match, or during a major match, cause a player to be unable to bat, bowl, or keep wicket when required by either the rules or the team's captain. This review describes the various region-wise injuries sustained in cricket along with their epidemiology, biomechanics, treatment, and prevention.Evidence Acquisition: Data were collected from peer-reviewed articles (obtained via PubMed search) published through November 2016 that involved the medical, biomechanical, and epidemiological aspects of cricket injuries.Study Design: Clinical review.Level Of Evidence: Level 4.Results: Cricket was one of the first sports to publish recommended methods for injury surveillance in 2005 from England, South Africa, Australia, the West Indies, and India. While the incidence of injuries is about the same, the prevalence of injuries has increased due to game format changes, increasing number of matches played, and decreased rest between matches. Bowling (41.3%), fielding, and wicket keeping (28.6%) account for most injuries. Acute injuries are most common (64%-76%), followed by acute-on-chronic (16%-22.8%) and chronic ones (8%-22%). The most common modern-day cricket injury is hamstring strain, and the most severe is lumbar stress fracture in young fast bowlers.Conclusion: With improved understanding of the scientific and medical aspects of cricket, along with advances in surgical and nonsurgical treatment techniques, the time to return to play has shortened considerably. While the prevalence of cricket injuries has increased, their severity has decreased over the past decades. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: We noticed that most of active sports children with low back pain (LBP) have muscle tightness around the pelvis and reduced trunk flexibility. Abnormalities in short-time inversion recovery (STIR) images on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can show stress fracture. Therefore, we investigated the associations among LBP, trunk flexibility, and lumbar stress fractures. Methods: A total of 130 patients under the age of 18 years complained of LBP were investigated in STIR MRI images. Among these 130 patients, 65 cases of lumbar stress fracture were diagnosed and 65 cases were not diagnosed as a lumbar stress fracture. We compared between a group suspected of stress fracture (suspected group) and a group of stress fracture(stress fracture group)about their trunk flexibility. These groups were investigated about their initial trunk flexibility about below items; Finger floor distance (FFD), Heel to buttock distance (HBD), straight leg raising (SLR). Results: Significant differences were observed between suspected group and stress fracture group about every items; SLR (P < 0.001), FFD (P < 0.01), HBD (P < 0.002). Most cases of stress fracture group had reduced trunk flexibility, and low flexibility in pelvic area muscles was observed in 93.8% (61/65) of cases at the initial examination. Otherwise, that of suspected group was 73.8%(48/65). Conclusions: Most patients of lumbar stress fracture had reduced trunk flexibility, and their reduced trunk flexibility might not be caused by LBP. In the early diagnosis of lumbar stress fractures using STIR MRI images, there were indicated that reduced trunk flexibility was one of helpful item for lumbar stress fracture. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The objective of the study was to determine the magnitude and side of quadratus lumborum (QL) asymmetries in elite, adult, cricket fast bowlers and the relationship with lumbar spine injury. Design: Cohort study. Setting: Cricket fast bowers had magnetic resonance (MR) scans at the start of a cricket season and their injury characteristics over the next cricket season were compared with the amount of QL asymmetry. Participants: Twenty-three elite, asymptomatic, adult, cricket fast bowlers. Assessment of Risk Factors: The cross-sectional area (CSA) of QL was measured using MR imaging. The association between side- to-side differences in CSA (asymmetry) was evaluated as a possible risk factor for development of lumbar spine injury. Main Outcome Measures: The main outcome measurements were QL CSA and asymmetry in relation to lumbar spine injury in cricket fast bowlers. Results: There were a greater proportion of dominant- (bowling arm) side asymmetries (65%). Asymmetry magnitudes that favored the dominant side were not significantly larger than those on the nondominant side. Four participants who had bone oedema on MR imaging preseason went on to develop symptomatic lumbar stress fractures. Participants with no lumbar spine injury had significantly larger QL asymmetries than those who sustained lumbar spine injury. Conclusions: Cricket fast bowlers demonstrated asymmetrical QL development, which may be related to the trunk positions adopted in the fast bowling technique. Uninjured bowlers had larger asymmetries than those who developed lumbar spine injury, which is contrary to some previous research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Stress fracture in the lumbar vertebra is a rare cause of low back pain in adult athletes. We report the case of a 32-year-old professional soccer player who returned to competitive sport 2 weeks after beingiagnosed with a fresh stress fracture in the left arch of the fifth lumbar vertebra. Three stress fractures occurred in succession in the atypical parts of the same arch of L5, not in the pars interarticularis. We discussed the developmental mechanism of these fractures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

1) Quantify the intensity of bone marrow oedema (BMO) present in the lumbar vertebrae of asymptomatic elite adult fast bowlers; 2) relate the intensity of BMO to bowling workload and lumbar bone stress injury (LBSI), and; 3) evaluate the utility of MRI screening to reduce the risk of LBSI. Thirty-eight elite Australian fast bowlers (21.6 ± 3.7 years) completed 48 screening MRI over 3 years. BMO intensity was quantified on MRI retrospectively. Standard practices for bowling workload monitoring and injury diagnosis were followed. Clinically significant BMO (signal intensity ratio ≥ 2.0) was observed in 22 (46%, 95% CI 31–61) screening MRI. These bowlers had a total of 77 (IQR 45–115) days off between seasons, compared to 66 (IQR 41–94) days off for bowlers with a BMO intensity less than 2.0 (p = 0.510). Fifteen bowlers received follow up MRI as part of individualised management based on their screening MRI, of which less than five went on to develop LBSI in the subsequent season. There was no difference in days or balls bowled in the 12 months following screening MRI between those who sustained LBSI and those who did not. BMO is common in asymptomatic bowlers. Identification of high-risk bowlers using screening MRI informs individualised management and may prevent progression to LBSI. • Bone marrow oedema is common in asymptomatic elite adult fast bowlers • Quantifying bone marrow oedema intensity on MRI has excellent reliability regardless of radiological experience • MRI may be used as a screening tool to guide individualised management and reduce the risk of severe lumbar bone stress [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Since much of the previous epidemiological research into lumbar stress fracture was conducted, there has been a marked increase in the amount of cricket being played. The aims were to determine the incidence and prevalence of lumbar stress fracture in English County Cricket fast bowlers between 2010 and 2016, determine the association with match bowling workload and observe seasonal variation in workload and injury., Methods: Lumbar stress fracture incidence and prevalence rates were calculated using new international methods for epidemiology in 368 professional English fast bowlers from 2010 to 2016. Workload variables were compared between lumbar stress fracture case and non-injured control groups, before entry in a logistic regression., Results: Fifty-seven lumbar stress fractures (mean age 22.81) were reported. Injury was most common in July and September. Match incidence was 0.16 lumbar stress fractures per 10 000 deliveries, annual incidence was 2.46 lumbar stress fractures per 100 fast bowlers and annual prevalence of lumbar stress fractures was 1.67% of squad days. Significant workload variables were observed between cases and controls. A peak 7-day workload of greater than 234 deliveries significantly increased the odds of sustaining a lumbar stress fracture 11-fold compared with bowling fewer than 197 deliveries., Conclusion: Lumbar stress fractures are common in young fast bowlers possibly due to immaturity of the lumbar spine. The condensed early and late-season schedule may be causing periods of overuse, resulting in an increase in incidence of lumbar stress fracture. Reduction of workload in young fast bowlers is needed to reduce incidence., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared.