Search

BackgroundCervical nerve root cysts are rare and easily missed or misdiagnosed in clinical practice. Although conventional surgery is effective for cervical nerve root cysts, it is limited by the small surgical field of view and operating range, relatively difficult procedure, and incomplete cyst resection. Microscope-assisted magnification of the surgical field of vision reduces the difficulty and ensures complete cyst resection.Case presentationA 58-year-old male patient was diagnosed with a cervical nerve root sleeve cyst on the right C7 vertebra with neurological symptoms. Microscope-assisted surgery was used as treatment. The cyst was completely removed by the microscope-assisted surgery, with satisfactory patient recovery. The surgery did not produce complications, such as spinal cord neurovascular injury, and the patient's symptoms disappeared quickly after surgery. During the 2-year follow-up, there was no complication and no recurrence.ConclusionMicroscope-assisted surgery in treatment of the C7 nerve root cyst could achieve a complete resection.

Background: Laminectomy and laminoplasty are popularly used in posterior cervical spine surgery but still have involved complications. We aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of microscope-assisted extensor muscle-preserving laminectomy (MA-EMPL) and open-door laminoplasty (ODLP) in treating multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy (MCSM)., Methods: A prospective study was designed to enroll twenty patients with MCSM underwent MA-EMPL, and recruit twenty-four patients with MCSM received ODLP (control). Radiographic measurements, outcome indicators including Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score and visual analogue score (VAS) were used to evaluate technical effectiveness. Surgical complications were documented to assess technical safety., Results: Postoperative cervical curvature index and range of neck motion (ROM) were not significantly changed except ROM in ODLP group. Postoperative JOA score and VAS in both groups showed improvements at final follow-up. There was no statistical difference in postoperative neurological recovery rates between two groups (67.6%±17.8% vs. 70.15%±19.6%, P=0.632). However, VAS was significantly lower at postoperative 1 month in MA-EMPL group compared with ODLP group (P<0.001). The incidences of C5 palsy were 0 vs. 16.7% between MA-EMPL group and ODLP group. There was no axial symptom occurred in MA-EMPL group while six patients in ODLP group (0 vs. 25%, P=0.049). In addition, the mean blood loss and hospital stay were lesser in MA-EMPL group compared with ODLP group (P<0.001, P=0.002, respectively)., Conclusions: MA-EMPL is an effective, safe and minimally invasive method in treatment of MCSM. Compared with ODLP, MA-EMPL has advantage to decrease intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, postoperative VAS and axial symptom, as well as preserve postoperative ROM., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (2019 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved.)