Search

Background: Near-peer teaching is increasingly used in medical education, supporting or replacing faculty teaching. It has positive aspects for learners and tutors, some of which are explained by higher social and cognitive congruence between learners and near-peer tutors (NPTs). This study investigates the optimal combination of faculty tutors (FTs) and NPTs in an abdominal ultrasound course. Methods: Sixty-four third-year medical students underwent a basic ultrasound course, with 75% of lessons taught by NPTs and 25% by FTs. Each of four groups had a different faculty teaching timing. A mixed methods approach used a survey and semi-structured interviews at the course end to elicit learners' preferences, and end-of-course examination scores to look for differences in outcomes. Results: Most learners preferred having faculty teaching in the second half of the course, saying it would be overwhelming to start with FTs. Learners preferred between a quarter and a third of the teaching to be from FTs, with NPTs rated better at teaching basics, and FTs contributing unique, helpful clinical knowledge. There was no significant between-group difference in examination scores. Conclusions: Medical students preferred most of their teaching to be from NPTs, with some faculty input in the second half of the course. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To explore the future of former anatomy tutors, their perception of the impact that the anatomy near-peer teaching (NPT) program have had on them, in terms of academic performance, professional development, personal growth, long-term anatomical knowledge, and views on body donor ethics. Additionally, we compared their academic performance with non-tutor peers in terms of ranking at the National Qualifying Examination (NQE). Methods: A voluntary survey was emailed to all anatomy tutors from 2005 to 2024, using an online Google Forms questionnaire including closed and open-ended questions across four themes. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively, while qualitative responses underwent thematic analysis. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test was performed to compare former tutors' NQE rankings to their peers. Results: Forty-seven out of 48 tutors responded. Tutors reported a positive program impact, including improvements in technical skills (100%), teamwork (97.9%), communication (89.4%), and organizational skills (76.6%), and good long-term anatomical knowledge retention (85.7%). Dissection on body donors was deemed essential for anatomy learning while shaping professional and ethical values. Of the 36 residents/specialists, 38.9% ranked in the top 10% at the NQE, with a statistically significant higher rank than their peers (p = 0.0011), and 100% obtained their desired specialty. Conclusion: This results suggest that the anatomy NPT program significantly enhanced tutors' academic performance, technical skills, personal and professional development, and was useful to foster a positive perception of dissection on body donors and reinforced the importance of anatomical knowledge in clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To compare Manual Small Incision Cataract Surgery (MSICS) microsurgical performance in course participants who received virtual reality simulation‐based training by either a surgical expert or a non‐ophthalmologist instructor. Setting: Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation, Copenhagen, Denmark. Design: Randomized controlled trial. Methods: Residents and specialists in ophthalmology with no prior MSICS experience were included to receive virtual reality simulation training in MSICS using the HelpMeSee simulator. The participants were randomly allocated to receive training from either an experienced MSICS surgeon or a non‐ophthalmologist, also known as near‐peer teaching. The performances of the participants were evaluated at baseline and post‐training using a MSICS proficiency‐based test with evidence of validity. Results: Thirty participants were included in the study and 29 completed the course. There was no significant difference in final test score between the two groups (p = 0.13). The performance score of both groups of participants increased significantly after receiving the training (p < 0.001). All participants passed the proficiency‐based test after receiving the training. Conclusion: We found no significant difference in surgical proficiency‐level whether the participants were trained by a surgical expert or a non‐ophthalmologist instructor for MSICS in a virtual‐reality based setting. The findings of this study suggest that near‐peer teaching within microsurgical performance potentially could be applied with teaching outcomes comparable to a surgical expert‐instructor. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Teaching helps the teacher’s own learning as a professional—as the saying goes, ‘to teach is to learn twice’. Near-peer teaching in clinical practice has been shown to contribute to the development of both teaching skills and necessary competencies for doctors. Research on how near-peer teachers learn through their teaching roles has mainly focused on classroom learning. However, understanding how the phenomenon of ‘teaching is learning twice’ occurs in clinical settings and its influencing factors is important for the development of a quality workplace learning environment. Therefore, this study investigated how residents learn through teaching in clinical practice and the factors influencing this process. Methods This study’s methodology is based on the constructivist grounded theory from a social constructivist perspective. Several teaching hospitals in Japan were included, and the study participants were post-graduate year 2 residents (PGY2s) from these hospitals. The interviews were recorded, transcribed into text, and analysed by the first author. Results From January 2016 to July 2022, 13 interviews were conducted with 11 PGY2s from nine educational hospitals. The PGY2s played diverse educational roles in clinical settings and learned competencies as physicians in almost all areas through such roles. We found that knowledge transfer and serving as role models stimulated PGY2s’ intrinsic motivation, encouraged reflection on their own experiences, and promoted self-regulated learning. Further, educating about procedural skills and clinical reasoning prompted reflection on their own procedural skills and thought processes. Supporting post-graduate year 1 residents’ reflections led to the refinement of PGY2s’ knowledge and thought processes through the verbal expression of their learning experiences. Such processes required the formation of a community of practice. Thus, education promoted learning through reflection and clarified the expert images of themselves that PGY2s envisaged. Conclusions The study found that residents acquire various physician competencies through multiple processes by teaching as near-peer teachers in clinical settings, that a community of practice must be formed for near-peer teaching to occur in a clinical setting, and that teaching brings learning to those who teach by promoting reflection and helping them envision the professionals they aim to be.

Background: Teaching helps the teacher's own learning as a professional—as the saying goes, 'to teach is to learn twice'. Near-peer teaching in clinical practice has been shown to contribute to the development of both teaching skills and necessary competencies for doctors. Research on how near-peer teachers learn through their teaching roles has mainly focused on classroom learning. However, understanding how the phenomenon of 'teaching is learning twice' occurs in clinical settings and its influencing factors is important for the development of a quality workplace learning environment. Therefore, this study investigated how residents learn through teaching in clinical practice and the factors influencing this process. Methods: This study's methodology is based on the constructivist grounded theory from a social constructivist perspective. Several teaching hospitals in Japan were included, and the study participants were post-graduate year 2 residents (PGY2s) from these hospitals. The interviews were recorded, transcribed into text, and analysed by the first author. Results: From January 2016 to July 2022, 13 interviews were conducted with 11 PGY2s from nine educational hospitals. The PGY2s played diverse educational roles in clinical settings and learned competencies as physicians in almost all areas through such roles. We found that knowledge transfer and serving as role models stimulated PGY2s' intrinsic motivation, encouraged reflection on their own experiences, and promoted self-regulated learning. Further, educating about procedural skills and clinical reasoning prompted reflection on their own procedural skills and thought processes. Supporting post-graduate year 1 residents' reflections led to the refinement of PGY2s' knowledge and thought processes through the verbal expression of their learning experiences. Such processes required the formation of a community of practice. Thus, education promoted learning through reflection and clarified the expert images of themselves that PGY2s envisaged. Conclusions: The study found that residents acquire various physician competencies through multiple processes by teaching as near-peer teachers in clinical settings, that a community of practice must be formed for near-peer teaching to occur in a clinical setting, and that teaching brings learning to those who teach by promoting reflection and helping them envision the professionals they aim to be. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

IntroductionMethodsResultsConclusionsNear-peer teaching offers mutual benefits for clinical trainees and the students they teach. However, General Practice Speciality Trainees (GPSTs) are typically less involved in community-based teaching than their hospital-based peers and often do so without formal pedagogical training. This study details the immediate and longer-term evaluation of a teaching skills course delivered to final year GPSTs. It addresses a gap within existing near-peer literature which, although extensive, is predominantly hospital-based and limited to short-term outcomes.The course was designed and delivered to all local final year GPST schemes. Pre- and post-course questionnaires scoring confidence, comfort, and understanding of teaching roles were analysed across two years’ delivery. Furthermore, individual interviews of participants 4–6 months after attendance were thematically analysed to explore how GPSTs translated course content into practice.GPSTs reported a decline in their teaching activities as they embarked on their final year of GP teaching. Immediate post-course teaching-related confidence and knowledge scores increased. However, follow-up interviews revealed that GPSTs’ initial enthusiasm was short-lived and outweighed by competing demands within an intensive short-duration training scheme. They expressed concerns about their own learner status as they themselves developed competency in a vast and varied speciality, and cited a lack of support from their trainers.Teaching skill courses alone are insufficient to address the ongoing challenges of enhancing the teaching role of GPSTs. Further work is now needed to explore multi-level interventions to promote the role of GPSTs as near-peer teachers to harness the mutual benefits to all involved. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: This study evaluates the perceptions and experiences of students in the role of near‐peer teachers in a psychomotor skills course. Materials and Methods: Final year BDS students were invited to participate as near‐peer teachers in a 4th‐year conventional bridges course. Near‐peer teachers attended eight sessions (3 h) of simulation laboratory teaching relating to conventional bridge tooth preparations and provided feedback on near‐peer tooth preparations and answered their questions. Interviews were conducted with all near‐peer teachers to evaluate their perceptions of this novel teaching and learning experience and a thematic analysis was performed to analyse the data. Results: Near‐peer teachers reported this to be a rewarding, enjoyable and challenging experience. They benefited from learning and revising content‐related materials as well as gained insights and teaching skills through the peer teaching process. Students felt supported and learned from peers and teaching staff and some used dyad teaching as a strategy to overcome perceived challenges. Students also reported the benefits of social and cognitive congruence in interacting with junior peers. However, students reported the feeling of inadequacy or lack of confidence and suggested the need for a training to prepare them better for the course. Conclusion: This paper reports on the benefits as well as challenges perceived by near‐peer teachers during simulation laboratory teaching experience. We provide solutions into how to better prepare students for such teaching experience. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Phenomenon: Ultrasound skills are becoming increasingly important in clinical practice but are resource-intensive to teach. Near-peer tutors often alleviate faculty teaching burden, but little is known about what teaching methods near-peer and faculty tutors use. Using the lens of cognitive apprenticeship, this study describes how much time faculty and near-peer tutors spend on different teaching methods during abdominal ultrasound skills training. Approach: Sixteen near-peer and 16 faculty tutors were videotaped during one 55-min practical ultrasound lesson with randomly assigned students. Videos were directly coded using Cognitive Apprenticeship teaching methods and activities. Segment durations were summed up and compared quantitatively. Findings: All 32 tutors spent most of the time on observing and helping students (Coaching, Median 29:14 minutes), followed by asking open and stimulating questions (Articulation, 12:04 minutes and demonstrating and giving explanations (Modeling, 04:50 minutes). Overall, distributions of teaching methods used were similar between faculty and near-peer tutors. However, faculty tutors spent more time on helping students manually, whereas near-peer tutors spent more time on exploring students' learning gaps and establishing a safe learning climate. Cognitive Apprenticeship was well suited as observational framework to describe ultrasound skills. Insights: Ultrasound train-the-tutor programs should particularly focus on coaching and articulation. Near-peers' similar use of teaching methods adds to the evidence that supports the use of near-peer teaching in ultrasound skills education. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Transitioning from classroom learning to clerkships presents a challenge for medical students because there is often sparse preparation material on how to effectively contribute to the medical team as a clerkship student. Although some medical schools have implemented transition-to-clerkship sessions, they often are led by faculty and lack the practical and contemporary guidance from students who have recently completed clerkships themselves. Methods: Using a sideways mentorship approach, we implemented a 1-hour near-peer Internal Medicine (IM) clerkship orientation bootcamp at our medical school and wrote an accompanying survival guide to teach students how to function as part of a medical team and to increase the transparency of student expectations and evaluations during the clerkship. The 1-hour session covered the following core topics: clerkship logistics, how to gather/present clinical information, a resident/student question-and-answer panel, and how to contribute to the medical team. A postclerkship medical student and second-year IM resident conducted the bootcamp for four student cohorts (105 students total) during the January to December 2022 clerkship year before the IM rotation of each cohort. After the bootcamp, students received a copy of the survival guide to solidify concepts covered in the session. Results: A preclerkship survey included questions to assess student confidence in 10 core IM clerkship domains pre- and postbootcamp. Both pre- and postclerkship surveys asked students to provide feedback on bootcamp strengths and weaknesses. Wilcoxon signed rank tests revealed a significant increase in postbootcamp student confidence rating for all 10 clerkship domains in the early clerkship cohort and in the late clerkship cohort for all of the domains, except finding clinical reference resources (P = 0.15). The bootcamp had the largest effect size (r) on student confidence in both early and late clerkship cohorts for the following clerkship domains: familiarity with IM clerkship evaluation (early: r = 0.61, P < 0.001; late: r = 0.56, P = 0.002), identification of ways to contribute to the medical team (early: r = 0.58, P < 0.001; late: r = 0.63, P < 0.001), and prerounding/chart checking (early r = 0.52, P < 0.001; late: r = 0.55, P = 0.001). The percentage of students rating the helpfulness of both the bootcamp and survival guide as a 3 to 5 on a 5-point Likert scale in the postclerkship survey was highest for the following domains: being familiar with the structure of a subjective, objective, assessment, and plan presentation (88% and 97%), prerounding/chart checking (82% and 95%), writing progress notes (82% and 92%), and identifying ways to contribute to the medical team (82% and 95%). Students commented that the main strengths of the bootcamp included its specific tips on synthesizing and presenting clinical information and its transparency about student expectations and experiences. Conclusions: A structured student-led bootcamp can increase clerkship preparation in core domains. The bootcamp is now part of mandatory clerkship didactics at our medical school, given its success during the 2022 clerkship year, and its content is continuing to be expanded upon by postclerkship students and residents. In addition, the format of the bootcamp also is being adapted to other clerkships, including surgery and obstetrics/gynecology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: This paper evaluates the perceptions and experience of students, in the role of both near‐peer teacher and learner who participated in the clinical dental photography course, using a mixed‐method analysis with focus group interviews of student tutors and a questionnaire of learner perceptions. Methods: A student‐led course on Digital Clinical Photography took place with BDS 5 and 6 students as near‐peer teachers (NPTs) and BDS 2 and 3 students as learners. Interviews were conducted with near‐peer teachers, and a questionnaire was distributed to learners to evaluate students' perceptions of this novel teaching and learning experience. Results: Near‐peer teaching has proven to be a beneficial alternative teaching pedagogy which was well‐received by NPTs and student learners. The content creation and teaching experience deepened NPTs' understanding on the subject matter and were motivated given the autonomous nature of the project. NPTs enjoyed and benefited from the collaborative nature of the project and the relevance of the subject matter and improved their clinical skills. The student learners enjoyed the learning experience and benefits of learning from NPTs which is supported by social and cognitive congruence. The positive perception of teaching and learning in pairs were also described. Conclusion: This project demonstrates the perceived benefits of near‐peer teaching for clinical photography skills for student experiential learning and highlights key elements on how to structure such an activity to engage and support students to participate in such future activities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Neuroanatomy is a complex and fascinating subject that is often a daunting prospect for medical students. In fact, the fear of learning neuroanatomy has gained its own name – "neurophobia." This widespread phenomenon among medical students poses a challenge to medical teachers and educators. To tackle "neurophobia" by summarising tips for dynamic and engaging neuroanatomy teaching formulated based on our experiences as medical students and evidence-based techniques. Focusing on the anatomical, physiological, and clinical aspects of neurology and their integration, here we present 12 tips which are [1] Teach the basic structure before fine details, [2] Supplement teaching with annotated diagrams, [3] Use dissections for haptic learning, [4] Teach form and function together, [5] Group anatomy into systems, [6] Familiarise students with neuroimaging, [7] Teach from clinical cases, [8] Let the patient become the teacher, [9] Build from first principles, [10] Try working in reverse, [11] Let the student become the teacher, [12] Let the student become the examiner. These 12 tips can be used by teachers and students alike to provide a high-yield learning experience. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Near‐peer teaching has been widely implemented in medical schools and the benefits for the near‐peer teachers (NPTs), the students, and the institution have been well documented. However, NPT training methods and perceptions of such have been limited. A four‐year clinical anatomy and surgical training program was established (est. 2019) as part of the continuous training timeline for NPTs (n > 60 total) formation at the Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, in Mexico. The program provides various training courses for the NPTs according to their hierarchy, including teaching skills, professional development, psychosocial aspects, and career objectives. A "Clinical Anatomy and Surgical Training Diploma" was planned with 12 modules to aid in developing these abilities, along with a higher understanding of clinical anatomy shared by expert clinical specialists, and diverse clinical and surgical skills such as suturing, catheterization, and basic surgical procedures. The program has a completion rate of approximately 15 NPTs/year. All, while creating an environment with a sense of belonging, and facilitating mentorship between fellow NPTs and educators. Near‐peer teachers develop leadership, communication, and teaching skills. The program has provided a constant source of anatomy educators, avoiding any shortage. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Near-peer teaching within healthcare education has numerous benefits, but there is limited literature to assess the impact that these experiences have on skill development and future teaching roles. This study describes the impact of serving as a near-peer teaching assistant on both former and current pharmacy students. The University of Texas at Austin College of Pharmacy implemented the Academic Assistant (AA) program in 2009 to provide an opportunity for students to participate as near-peer educators in a variety of courses. To determine the impact of these AA positions on current and former students, participants from five years of the program were surveyed regarding the impact of the program on skill development and current or future interest in teaching/mentoring. Current students in the AA program reported that participation increased the likelihood of pursuing a career with teaching/mentoring roles. A majority (65%) of alumni who participated in the program reported being in a current teaching/mentoring role with 42% responding that the AA program was impactful to their career choice. The qualitative analysis showed that direct impact to respondents included validating career goals and increasing interests in teaching/mentoring roles. Those who reported no direct impact on their career still gained valuable professional skills that included: public speaking, time management, broadened perspectives, and increased understanding of academia career expectations. Providing opportunities for pharmacy students to serve in near-peer teaching roles increased students' interest in pursuing teaching/mentoring roles and offered valuable professional experiences. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Introduction Peer-assisted learning programs have been focused on providing students with competencies to deliver lectures and facilitate workshops, whereas involvement of students as co-developers of educational programmes has been relatively under-described in the literature. Likewise, the use of students as facilitators in simulation-based training and debriefing is also scarce. In this paper, we describe how medical students were co-developers of a novel course on patient safety and how they were trained as student facilitators to conduct simulation-based training and debriefing, as well as workshops. Methods Medical students co-developed a course in patient safety consisting of three simulation-based scenarios and three workshops. The students were educated in relevant patient safety topics. They were trained to become student facilitators to conduct workshops, simulations and debriefings at a patient safety course for medical students. A questionnaire was developed to evaluate the course participants´ perception of the learning objectives and the student facilitators following the latest course in 2020. In addition, semi-structured interviews with the student facilitators were conducted to explore their perceptions of being part of the course. Results A total of 92% of the course participants completed the evaluation of the course. The majority of the course participants found that the student facilitators created a safe learning environment and had the necessary skills to teach. The learning objectives for the course were found to be useful. A total of 10 interviews with the student facilitators were conducted. We found that the student facilitators were motivated to teach in the course, as a way of improving their teamwork, leadership qualities and communication skills, as well as their resume. Some of the student facilitators mentioned that they were able to create a safe learning environment, whereas others mentioned a feeling of inadequacy for their teacher role. In addition to developing their teaching skills, they mentioned that they developed their medical expertise, alongside their communication-, collaboration-, leadership- and professional skills. Conclusion This study illustrates how medical students were involved in the co-development, delivery and implementation of a course in patient safety. The evaluation of the course shows that student facilitators succeeded in creating a safe learning environment. The interviews of the student facilitators reveal their various motivations for teaching, in addition to different perceptions of their experience as a student facilitator. Some expressed a positive feeling of being able to establish a safe learning environment, whilst others expressed a feeling of inadequacy when facilitating peers. In addition, the student facilitators indicated that they developed themselves both professionally and personally.

Abstract Background The training of near-peer (NP) teachers and junior faculty instructors received major attention as a possible solution for the shortage of experienced anatomy instructors in faculties of medicine and health professions. Several studies described the training of NP teachers and junior instructors (≤ 2 years of teaching experience) using various methods. However, few publications include On the Job Training (OJT), which enables reflection and performance evaluation and encourages professionals to cope with their blind spots. Previous publications describing OJT did not include formal observation of the NP teacher or junior instructor. Therefore, this study aimed to present a novel approach to OJT inclusion during prosection laboratories based on the Lewinian experiential model. Methods Eight physical therapy (PT) graduates were recruited as junior anatomy instructors into the prosection laboratories. All participated in a unique training program during two consecutive academic years (2017, 2018) and received OJT during the teaching sessions. Two questionnaires were filled out to evaluate the educational impact of the training program. Eighty-three first-year PT students participated in prosection laboratories in anatomy taught by junior instructors, and filled out a questionnaire evaluating the performance of both junior and senior instructors. In addition, we compared the final grades in anatomy obtained by students taught by senior instructors to the grades of those taught by junior instructors. Results Each junior anatomy instructor participated in four OJT sessions. Based on self-reported measures, all professional and didactic aspects of the training program received a median score of 4.5 or higher on a five-point Likert scale. Students obtained similar grades in anatomy when taught by junior instructors compared with senior ones, and were similarly satisfied from the teaching performance of both senior and junior anatomy instructors. Conclusions OJT is applicable in a small-sized PT program facing a shortage of anatomy instructors. Including junior anatomy instructors in prosection laboratories for PT students is a viable solution to the shortage of experienced anatomy instructors. Further study, involving a larger cohort with a longer follow up will strengthen the preliminary results presented here.

Near-peer teaching is an innovative approach to teaching the skills of supervising and precepting while benefiting students with different levels of experience and academic training. This study describes near-peer activities in skills-based laboratory courses that provided opportunities for one-on-one teaching to benefit learners in the introductory lab courses while simultaneously training more advanced students for future supervisory and precepting roles. Three community pharmacy near-peer teaching simulations were designed and implemented: 1) Patient Counseling and Medication Adherence, 2) Dispensing and Patient Counseling, and 3) Drug Utilization Review and Prescriber Calls. These activities took place over two semesters of a pharmacy skills lab with all first- and third-year Doctor of Pharmacy students. In Autumn 2019, 80% (111/139) of P1s and 67% (80/119) of P3s responded to the course evaluation survey. In Spring 2020, 73% (100/137) of P1s and 68% (80/118) of P3s responded to the course evaluation survey. The P3s reported increased confidence in their ability to provide meaningful feedback, while P1s reported increased confidence in communicating with patients and healthcare providers. Performance data revealed that most P1s and P3s completed dispensing and communication activities accurately using a near-peer approach. Overall, the P1s and P3s felt the activities were valuable learning experiences. The near-peer activities described in this study fill a gap in the training of pharmacy graduates for future precepting and supervisory roles. Evaluation of these near-peer activities suggest that both junior and senior learners benefit from simulated preceptor-intern interactions, supporting this innovative approach to address supervisory and precepting responsibilities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Radiotherapy techniques are expanding in range and complexity; therefore, protecting learning environments where residents nurture treatment planning skills is critical. The evidence base for 'near-peer' teaching (NPT), where professionals at a similar career stage assist in each other's learning, is growing in hospital-based disciplines, but has not been reported in radiation oncology. The feasibility of a resident-led teaching programme for developing treatment planning skills was investigated herein with quality improvement (QI) methodology. Following consultation with attendings (n = 10) and all residents (n = 17) at the two cancer centres in the region, a regular NPT session focused on planning skills was initiated at the largest centre, with video-linking to the second centre. Tutorials were case-based and pitched at the level of qualifying examinations. Plan–Do–Study–Act (PDSA) cycles were designed based on primary and secondary improvement drivers derived by group consensus among residents, with tutorials adopted accordingly. Participation, content, and satisfaction were monitored for 20 months. Six PDSA cycles reformed the tutorial format, leading to logistical and pedagogical benefits including interprofessional contributions and enhanced interactivity. Tutorials occurred on 85% prescribed occasions (n = 45) during the subsequent 18-month follow-up, with 25 distinct tumour sites featured. Resident participation and satisfaction increased, independent of resident seniority. Tutorials were paused for the first 2 months of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic only. A high-quality and cost-effective regional, trainee-led teaching programme on treatment planning was feasible and cost-effective in this study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

" The COVID-19 pandemic significantly changed the way anatomy classes were carried out, depriving students of practical learning using real anatomical specimens. Once COVID restrictions were lifted and students returned to a normal class setting a randomized study was carried out to elevate effectiveness of practical anatomy didactics. " The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of an anatomy workshop based on demonstrating anatomical structures delivered in a face-to-face format, and to compare it with a standard course based on online learning. " The randomization involved 350 students from whom 80 participants were drawn to form both a study and control group. " The study consisted of three parts: exam 1, workshop, exam 2. " The study group participated in all parts of the project, while the control group participated only in the exam. " The workshop was held by near peer teachers (NPT). Statistical analysis showed that participation in the workshop had an effect on the passing score of exam 2 (p=0.039). It was also shown that the difference in scores was significantly higher (p=0.049) in the study group compared to the control group. " The study proved that the workshops which were based on demonstrating anatomical structures by NPT significantly affected the scores obtained by trainees. In conclusion, the project confirmed the importance of student interaction with anatomical specimens and that online teaching is not a substitute for teaching in a dissecting room. Additionally, this study confirmed the high usefulness of NPT as a support for the didactic process conducted by experts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Near-peer teaching, a type of peer teaching traditionally used in medical education, has gained popularity as a way of enhancing students' learning in undergraduate health disciplines such as nursing, physiotherapy and paramedicine. Research has established the positive impact of near-peer teaching on health professional students' cognitive and psychomotor outcomes; however, little is known about its influence on students' self-efficacy beliefs, which are important predictors of future clinical performance. To determine the influence, if any, of near-peer teaching participation on undergraduate health professional students' self-efficacy beliefs. Whittemore and Knafl's integrative review framework was used as a guide to synthesise diverse literature including quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods peer-reviewed studies and grey literature. A search was conducted of published literature prior to October 2023 using the MEDLINE, Embase, SCOPUS, ERIC, PsycINFO and CINAHL databases; 1376 non-duplicate studies were identified. Following independent screening by two authors, nine studies were included in the review. Critical appraisal of studies was performed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Data were extracted and compared to generate themes related to students' self-efficacy outcomes. Seven included studies were quantitative survey-based; five were from medicine. Two studies met all methodological quality criteria. In seven studies, near-peer teaching participation positively influenced junior (i.e., first- and second-year) health professional students' self-efficacy in three domains – psychomotor skills, interprofessional skills and critical thinking. In four studies, near-peer teaching participation enhanced senior (i.e., final- or penultimate-year) health professional students' self-efficacy in teaching. Few high-quality studies with a focus on near-peer teaching's influence on health professional students' self-efficacy beliefs were found. Available evidence suggests that near-peer teaching may positively impact health professional students' self-efficacy beliefs across several domains. More rigorous, multi-perspective investigations are needed from various health disciplines to build upon this evidence. • Near-peer teaching may positively influence junior health professional students' self-efficacy beliefs in several domains • Near-peer teaching may positively influence senior health professional students' self-efficacy in teaching • Health professional students may benefit from repeated near-peer interactions in various settings • Research examining near-peer teaching and students' self-efficacy beliefs is needed in various health disciplines [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Rationale and Objectives We aimed to assess the impact of our institution's recently created point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) course for preclinical medical students by examining its effect on first–year-level medical knowledge, self-reported skill level, and beliefs regarding the importance of ultrasound in future clinical practice. Materials and Methods A total of 18 first-year medical students completed a 5-month near–peer-led training program in POCUS consisting of 3-hour teaching sessions (7), 4-hour clinical sessions (10–12), and an independent study. Students completed pre- and postprogram assessments examining (1) student perceptions about ultrasound and its importance to future careers, (2) students' self-reported skill level with ultrasound, and (3) performance on an anatomy and physiology knowledge quiz. Scores and responses were compared to 20 controls. Results The majority of students believed that ultrasound was useful for learning anatomy and would be important in their future clinical practice. Students who completed our training program tended to perform better than controls on a test of medical knowledge. Despite reporting far fewer hours of formal ultrasound training, control students rated their skill level comparably to POCUS-trained students. Conclusions This study provides evidence that ultrasound is well received by medical students and may be useful for teaching basic anatomy concepts.

Abstract Background Near-peer teaching (NPT) is a special way of teaching where the tutor is one or more academic years ahead of the person being tutored. The literature agrees on the benefits of the method, but there are only a few publications examining its effectiveness using objective methods. The aim of our study was to examine the effectiveness of NPT in the training of basic surgical skills. Methods We included 60 volunteer students who participated in a 20 × 45 min long surgical skills course. Based on the results of a pre-course test, we randomly divided the students into six equal groups. All groups completed the same curriculum, with three groups being assisted by a NPT tutor. After the course, they completed the same test as at the beginning. The exams were recorded on anonymized videos and were blindly evaluated. The students’ satisfaction was monitored using a self-administered online anonymous questionnaire. Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney and Wilcoxon tests. Results Overall, student performance improved with completion of the course (from 119.86 to 153.55 points, p

Human anatomy is crucial in the current medical curriculum, being fundamental for the development of a solid knowledge background for medical students. However, there is an ongoing debate concerning the optimal method of anatomical learning. This study aimed to investigate the peer tutors' perceptions regarding their participation in anatomy near-peer teaching (NPT) and to assess a newly established Social Media Team (SMT) dedicated to online anatomy education by its members. Overall, 28 undergraduate medical students participated in the study. Students were assigned into two groups. Group 1 (n=12) comprised third- and fourth-year undergraduate medical students participating as peer tutors aiding the laboratory exercises of Topographical Anatomy. Group 2 (n=16) were third-year undergraduate medical students, who were exposed to the full first-year operation of the SMT. Students' perceptions were investigated via anonymous 5-point Likert-scale questionnaires. Peer tutors' responses indicate positive effects on all aspects of NPT (mean score > 3), especially concerning anatomical understanding and the experience regarding the educational environment (mean score > 4). Moreover, members' responses indicate positive effects on all aspects of SMT (mean score > 4). The findings suggest that the proper integration of such modalities could greatly enhance anatomy education, expanding the anatomical knowledge beyond the course's scope. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The training of near-peer (NP) teachers and junior faculty instructors received major attention as a possible solution for the shortage of experienced anatomy instructors in faculties of medicine and health professions. Several studies described the training of NP teachers and junior instructors (≤ 2 years of teaching experience) using various methods. However, few publications include On the Job Training (OJT), which enables reflection and performance evaluation and encourages professionals to cope with their blind spots. Previous publications describing OJT did not include formal observation of the NP teacher or junior instructor. Therefore, this study aimed to present a novel approach to OJT inclusion during prosection laboratories based on the Lewinian experiential model. Methods: Eight physical therapy (PT) graduates were recruited as junior anatomy instructors into the prosection laboratories. All participated in a unique training program during two consecutive academic years (2017, 2018) and received OJT during the teaching sessions. Two questionnaires were filled out to evaluate the educational impact of the training program. Eighty-three first-year PT students participated in prosection laboratories in anatomy taught by junior instructors, and filled out a questionnaire evaluating the performance of both junior and senior instructors. In addition, we compared the final grades in anatomy obtained by students taught by senior instructors to the grades of those taught by junior instructors. Results: Each junior anatomy instructor participated in four OJT sessions. Based on self-reported measures, all professional and didactic aspects of the training program received a median score of 4.5 or higher on a five-point Likert scale. Students obtained similar grades in anatomy when taught by junior instructors compared with senior ones, and were similarly satisfied from the teaching performance of both senior and junior anatomy instructors. Conclusions: OJT is applicable in a small-sized PT program facing a shortage of anatomy instructors. Including junior anatomy instructors in prosection laboratories for PT students is a viable solution to the shortage of experienced anatomy instructors. Further study, involving a larger cohort with a longer follow up will strengthen the preliminary results presented here. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The benefits of near-peer learning are well established in several aspects of undergraduate medical education including preparing students for Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs). The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in a paradigm shift to predominantly online teaching. Objective: This study aims to demonstrate the feasibility and benefits of an exclusively online near-peer OSCE teaching program in a time of significant face-to-face and senior-led teaching shortage. Methods: A teaching program was delivered to penultimate-year students by final-year students at Manchester Medical School. Program development involved compiling a list of salient topics and seeking senior faculty approval. Teachers and students were recruited on Facebook. In total, 22 sessions and 42 talks were attended by 72 students and taught by 13 teachers over a 3-month period. Data collection involved anonymous weekly questionnaires and 2 separate anonymous student and teacher postcourse questionnaires including both quantitative and qualitative components. Results: On a scale of 1-10, students rated the quality of the program highly (mean 9.30, SD 1.15) and felt the sessions were highly useful in guiding their revision (mean 8.95, SD 0.94). There was a significant increase in perceived confidence ratings after delivery of the program (P<.001). Teachers felt the program helped them better understand and retain the subject material taught (mean 9.36, SD 0.81) and develop skills to become effective clinical teachers (mean 9.27, SD 0.79). Conclusions: This is the first study demonstrating the efficacy of a near-peer OSCE teaching program delivered exclusively online. This provides an exemplary framework for how similar programs should be encouraged given their efficacy and logistical viability in supplementing the undergraduate curriculum. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper reports on a study of student peer mentorship in the context of nursing education in a higher education program in Canada. The study used an embodied hermeneutic phenomenological methodology to investigate student peer mentors' perceptions of teaching during peer mentorship. The data were collected over one calendar year (2019) and involved analysis of 10 participants' interview data and their 'body maps,' produced in response to guided questions. Through the data analysis a core theme of 'commitment to mentee growth' was identified, along with seven interrelated themes: sharing responsibility for learning, moderating stress, mediating power relations, navigating unknown processes, valuing creative approaches, offering generous acceptance, and facilitating confidence. Student peer mentorship has the potential to contribute to health professions education in a number of unique ways including through embodied attunement, trusting intersubjective relations, and dialogic education. This study is innovative in its purposeful design and aim to investigate both cognitive and embodied perceptions of student peer mentors. The findings point to the promise of student peer mentorship for advancing health sciences education. Implications for peer mentorship program development in health professions education are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Teaching with real patients in the clinical setting lies at the heart of health professional education, providing an essential component to clinical training. This is true of all the health disciplines – particularly medicine, nursing, dentistry, physiotherapy, and dietetics. Clinical tutorials orientate students to the culture and social aspects of the healthcare environment, and shape their professional values as they prepare for practice. These patient-based tutorials introduce students to the clinical environment in a supervised and structured manner, providing opportunities to participate in communication skills, history taking, physical examination, clinical reasoning, diagnosis and management. It is only through participation that new practices are learnt, and progressively, new tasks are undertaken. The aim of this paper is to provide health professional students and early career health professionals involved in peer and near peer teaching, with an overview of approaches and key tips for teaching in the clinical setting. Although there are many competencies developed by students in the clinical setting, our tips for teaching focus on the domains of medical knowledge, interpersonal and communication skills, and professionalism.

Student-as-teacher electives are increasingly offered at medical schools, but little is known about how medical education experiences among enrolled students compare with those of their peers. The study's aim was to characterize medical students' education-related experiences, attitudes, knowledge, and skills based on their enrollment status in a student-as-teacher course. We conducted four focus groups at a medical school in the United States: two with graduating students in a student-as-teacher elective (n = 11) and two with unenrolled peers (n = 11). Transcripts were analyzed using the Framework Method to identify themes. Four themes emerged: interest in and attitudes towards medical education; medical education skills, knowledge, and frameworks; strategies for giving/receiving feedback; medical education training as part of medical school. Course participants demonstrated higher-level education-related knowledge and skills. Both groups endorsed teaching skills as important and identified opportunities to incorporate medical education training into medical school curricula. Medical education knowledge and teaching skills are self-reported as important learning outcomes for medical students, independent of enrollment status in a student-as-teacher course. The structure of such courses, best understood through a deliberate practice-based model, supports students' achievement of key learning outcomes. Certain course elements may warrant inclusion in standard medical school curricula. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Vertically integrating physiology into patient care has the potential to improve clinical reasoning. Clinical Physiology Grand Rounds (CPGR) is a case-based teaching method that brings together students from all years of medical school to focus on linking clinical presentations to core basic science concepts including anatomy, physiology, and pathophysiology. In this study, we describe the implementation of CPGR at two different institutions in the United States and assess student-reported outcomes. Methods: We survey students who participated in CPGR at Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons (P&S) and Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC). Subjects were queried across three domains: the benefits of attending, the impact of concept maps, and the impact of the mixed-learner environment. Results: Despite differences in session leadership and the underlying medical school curricula, conference attendees reported similar benefits at the two schools included in this study. Students overwhelmingly (92.9%) reported that remembering clinical presentations was easier when they understood the underlying physiology. They also reported gaining a true understanding of concepts that were previously memorized (87.5%). Both clinical (92.5%) and preclinical students (93.1%) valued the mixed-learner environment as a component of the conference. Discussion: By assuring a mixed-learner environment with near-peer interactions, using concept maps as a teaching tool, and rigorously linking clinical presentation and management to physiological concepts, we found that the key benefits of CPGR were replicable across different institutions, despite several local differences in how CPGR was implemented, led, and conducted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Neurophobia, a well-described fear of neurology, affects medical students worldwide and may be one of the factors contributing to a shortage of neurologists in the United States. Residents spend a considerable amount of time with medical students; therefore, we sought to understand better the impact neurology residents have on medical students during their neurology clerkship and their subsequent interest in neurology. We aimed to identify and implement strategies to decrease neurophobia and increase the number of students pursuing neurology as a career. Methods Third-year medical students (n = 234) of UTHealth’s McGovern Medical School rotating through their neurology core clerkship completed two surveys regarding their rotation experiences. Surveys were completed anonymously before and after the clerkship to measure their interest and confidence in neurology and the impact of their interactions with the neurology residents during the clerkship. In parallel, residents participated in a teaching workshop focused on small group teaching to improve their teaching effectiveness. Non-parametrical comparison and ordinal regression analyses were utilized for data analyses. Results Medical students reported a statistically significant increase in their confidence in managing neurological conditions and interest in pursuing a neurology residency after their clerkship. There was a significant association between the medical students’ overall rotation experience and the residents’ teaching effectiveness. The overall clerkship experience correlated with the medical students’ interest and confidence in neurology. There was a trend towards an increase in residents’ teaching effectiveness and students’ rotation experience after a resident teaching workshop. Additionally, of note, students who rotated on both and outpatient and inpatient sites during their clerkship reported an increased interest in neurology. Conclusion Our study supports that resident-led teaching efforts are important in improving medical students’ neurologic education and their interest in neurology. Our data also supports that the interest in neurology increased for medical students after their neurology clerkship. We examined future strategies to implement “near-peer” teaching activities to enhance the medical students’ neurologic educational experience. These strategies could potentially mitigate neurophobia and ultimately lead to a much-needed increase in future neurologists.

In response to the Covid‐19 pandemic, medical educators have transformed pre‐clerkship anatomy curricula into online formats. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and student perceptions of an online near‐peer anatomy curriculum. The classes of 2022 and 2023 completed identical foundational anatomy curricula in‐person, whereas the class of 2024 completed an adapted curriculum for remote online learning. Quantitative and qualitative responses were used to compare attitudes between instructional methods. Assessment scores and evaluation survey responses were collected from the classes of 2022 (n = 185), 2023 (n = 184), and 2024 (n = 183). Mean assessment scores (±SD) for the classes of 2022, 2023, and 2024 were 93.64% (±5.86), 93.75% (±4.09), and 92.04% (±4.83), respectively. Post hoc group comparisons showed the class of 2024 scored significantly lower than the two previous classes [2022: (H(1) = 18.58, P < 0.001), 2023: (H(1) = 18.65, P < 0.001)]. Mean survey results concerning curriculum quality were 4.06/5.00 for the class of 2023 and 3.57/5.0 for the class of 2024 (t(365) = 2.67, P = 0.008). Considering a small effect size (η2 = 0.034), there was no meaningful difference in student assessment scores. A potential drawback of online near‐peer anatomy teaching remains in student perceptions of course quality; qualitative feedback suggested technological limitations and perceptions of online course instructors were partly responsible for lower student satisfaction. Following the Covid‐19 pandemic, medical educators should incorporate the lessons learned from this unique educational inflection point to improve curricula moving forward. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Near-peer teaching (NPT) has been identified as a contemporary and valued pedagogical approach in higher education health programs, and it has recently gained momentum in paramedicine education. The objective of this study was to investigate the perceived experience of student paramedics involved in a near-peer teaching program over two academic trimesters. A cross-sectional study design was utilised in the form of an online questionnaire. The questionnaire contained a variety of questions that related to the experience of student paramedics involved in paramedicine near-peer programs. Of the 65 students enrolled, 34 completed the questionnaire (52.3% response rate). The results indicated that NPT was overwhelmingly considered a valuable and positive pedagogical method for use in paramedicine education. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Clinical teachers receive little training in the actual practice of teaching, often lacking any pedagogical framework by which to approach learners. The Center for Research in Education, Diversity, and Excellence (CREDE) offers an evidence‐based pedagogical framework from our experience in primary and secondary education that can transform the clinician's teaching practice. The CREDE standards of effective pedagogy provide concrete guidance for a clinician's interactions with trainees, peers, and patients. This framework can support clinical teachers to be more effective when working with the diverse set of trainees, peers, and patients that our fields must engage. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

While many medical undergraduate ultrasound teaching programmes combine teaching from both physician and student ('near-peer') tutors, there has been little research on how these can be optimally combined. In this study, four groups of 16 medical undergraduates each received twelve lessons from student tutors and four lessons from physician tutors as part of their basic ultrasound course. Each group's physician tutor lessons took place in a different quarter of the course timetable. Quantitative and qualitative data were then collected through an online questionnaire, and 15 participants had 1:1 interviews. This interim analysis shows that, when designing combined ultrasound teaching for medical undergraduates, student tutors should be used at the start and physician tutors in the second half of the programme. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Teaching and learning of anatomy for medical students have been extensively studied. However, we believe that a 'gold-standard' of an anatomy teaching and learning model is difficult to establish as every educational institution faces unique. For the past ten years at the University of Notre Dame Australia, School of Medicine Sydney, the anatomy faculty has implemented evidence-based teaching strategies adopted from medical schools around the world and supported by timely student feedback to deliver cost-effective and sustainable anatomy learning. Student evaluations of this program have been positive and associated with improved summative anatomy results. This article describes ten principles pursued by our faculty, which we hope will help others in restructuring or enhancing their anatomy teaching and learning program.

Introduction: Third-year medical students traditionally receive their didactic or small group teaching sessions from clinical faculty during clerkship rotations. Near-peer teaching is increasingly recognized as an acceptable method for teaching, however most near-peer teaching takes place during the pre-clinical curriculum. We sought to determine if fourth year medical students were noninferior to faculty in facilitating small group discussions during clerkship rotations. Methods: Seventy-five third-year medical students participated in a small group session focused on rheumatologic diseases during their internal medicine clerkship rotation. Students were taught by fourth-year medical students who self-selected to participate as near-peer teachers at 1 clinical site (near-peers, N = 36) and by clinical faculty at another site (N = 39). At the end of the session, third-year medical students completed a survey evaluating teacher performance and effectiveness. Results: There was no significant difference between the 2 groups on each of the 17 survey items assessing teacher performance, the total teaching performance score, and the teaching effectiveness rating (all P -values >.05). A mean between-group difference of 2% in favor of the near-peers indicated noninferiority of the near-peer teachers compared with faculty teachers on the total teaching performance score. An absolute difference of 14% in favor of the near-peers indicated noninferiority of the near-peer teachers compared with faculty teachers on the teaching effectiveness score. Near-peer teachers reported several benefits, including improving their own medical knowledge and skills as a future educator. Discussion: Our data supports the noninferiority of the perceived performance and effectiveness of near-peer teachers compared to faculty teachers in the clerkship setting. Adding near-peer teachers to the clerkship setting is feasible and can be beneficial to all stakeholders. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Near-peer teaching (NPT) is a special way of teaching where the tutor is one or more academic years ahead of the person being tutored. The literature agrees on the benefits of the method, but there are only a few publications examining its effectiveness using objective methods. The aim of our study was to examine the effectiveness of NPT in the training of basic surgical skills. Methods: We included 60 volunteer students who participated in a 20 × 45 min long surgical skills course. Based on the results of a pre-course test, we randomly divided the students into six equal groups. All groups completed the same curriculum, with three groups being assisted by a NPT tutor. After the course, they completed the same test as at the beginning. The exams were recorded on anonymized videos and were blindly evaluated. The students' satisfaction was monitored using a self-administered online anonymous questionnaire. Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney and Wilcoxon tests. Results: Overall, student performance improved with completion of the course (from 119.86 to 153.55 points, p < 0.01). In groups where a NPT tutor assisted, students achieved a significantly better score (37.20 vs. 30.18 points improvement, p = 0.036). The difference was prominent in surgical knotting tasks (14.73 vs. 9.30 points improvement, p < 0.01). In cases of suturing (15.90 vs. 15.46 points) and laparoscopy (7.00 vs. 4.98 points), the presence of the NPT tutor did not significantly affect development. Based on student feedback, although students positively assessed the presence of NPT, it did not significantly improve students' overall satisfaction since it was already 4,82 on a scale of 5 in the control group. Conclusions: Overall, involving a NPT tutor had a positive impact on student development. An outstanding difference was observed in connection with knotting techniques. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Vertically integrating physiology into patient care has the potential to improve clinical reasoning. Clinical Physiology Grand Rounds (CPGR) is a case-based teaching method that brings together students from all years of medical school to focus on linking clinical presentations to core basic science concepts including anatomy, physiology, and pathophysiology. In this study, we describe the implementation of CPGR at two different institutions in the United States and assess student-reported outcomes. Methods: We survey students who participated in CPGR at Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons (P&S) and Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC). Subjects were queried across three domains: the benefits of attending, the impact of concept maps, and the impact of the mixed-learner environment. Results: Despite differences in session leadership and the underlying medical school curricula, conference attendees reported similar benefits at the two schools included in this study. Students overwhelmingly (92.9%) reported that remembering clinical presentations was easier when they understood the underlying physiology. They also reported gaining a true understanding of concepts that were previously memorized (87.5%). Both clinical (92.5%) and preclinical students (93.1%) valued the mixed-learner environment as a component of the conference. Discussion: By assuring a mixed-learner environment with near-peer interactions, using concept maps as a teaching tool, and rigorously linking clinical presentation and management to physiological concepts, we found that the key benefits of CPGR were replicable across different institutions, despite several local differences in how CPGR was implemented, led, and conducted.

Rationale and objectivesTeaching is an important skill. Academic physicians teach on a daily basis, and nearly all physicians occasionally teach colleagues and patients. There are generally few opportunities for medical students to learn teaching skills. We developed a novel "near-peer" teaching program in which fourth-year students cotaught first-year students.Materials and methodsEighteen fourth-year students enrolled in our institution's primary senior radiology elective learned the basics of ultrasound through a series of lectures and hands-on scanning sessions. Each fourth-year student, paired with a radiology resident or attending, then cotaught a first-year anatomy small group session. After instruction, voluntary surveys were administered to assess the perceived value of the "near-peer" teaching experience.ResultsSeventeen of 18 (94%) and 104 of 120 (87%) administered surveys were returned by fourth- and first-year students, respectively. Sixteen (94%) and 99 (95%) of the fourth- and first-year students reported they "enjoyed" or "really enjoyed" the near-peer teaching experience. Fourteen (82%) of the fourth years perceived improvement in their teaching skills and an increase in their knowledge. Only 8 (47%) of the fourth years thought they were "helpful" or "very helpful," though 92 (88%) of the first years identified their fourth-year co-instructors as "helpful" or "very helpful."ConclusionsWe piloted a novel "near-peer" program. Both senior and freshman students enjoyed the experience, and fourth years thought the session was educational for them as well. Although most fourth years did not judge themselves as helpful, first-year students overwhelmingly considered them a useful addition to the session.

Background: Near-peer teaching (NPT) has a longstanding history within medical education. While it is becoming increasingly recognized within medical curricula, its beginnings can be traced back to informal teaching among medical students. Informal NPT such as this is still commonplace. However, it is often overlooked within the literature and has remained hidden from the scrutiny of evidence-based education. There has been minimal research conducted surrounding NPT outside of formal teaching sessions. Methods: A scoping PubMed search was conducted after identifying appropriate search terms. Directly relevant and high quality articles were included. Results/Synthesis: Within this scoping review, we discuss the potential benefits and shortfalls of such teaching. Results: Benefits include the opportunity for tutors to consolidate their own learning while contributing to the medical school community. Their learners benefit from the opportunity for small group learning focused on a relevant level of knowledge. However, shortfalls include the lack of prerequites, lack of content monitoring, and lack of resources. These should be considered when discussing the efficacy of this teaching. Conclusion: We also explore the wider culture of this informal NPT within medical education. We hope to promote further thought into this area, considering how guidance can be given to support both the near-peer teachers and their learners. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Interprofessional attitudes existing between healthcare disciplines can negatively impact communication and collaboration in the clinical setting. While human anatomy is a topic central to healthcare trainees, the potential of the anatomy laboratory to minimize negative interprofessional attitudes has yet to be characterized. This study aimed to assess the effects of an anatomy interprofessional near‐peer learning activity (AIP‐NPLA) on medical and nursing students' interprofessional attitudes at McGill University. The authors employed a convergent parallel mixed methods study to explore participants' AIP‐NPLA experiences. The Attitudes to Health Professionals Questionnaire (AHPQ) was used pre‐ and post‐AIP‐NPLA to assess participants' attitudes toward their own and their counterpart profession. In addition, a focus group was held immediately following the AIP‐NPLA to explore participants' experiences and interprofessional perceptions. Quantitative results using a principal components analysis demonstrated significant changes in nursing students' responses between pre‐ and post‐AIP‐NPLA scoring, rating the medical profession as being more caring overall. Medical students' responses pre‐ and post‐AIP‐NPLA demonstrated no significant differences. Qualitative results also suggested a breakdown of negative attitudes, an increased understanding of inter‐ and intra‐professional roles, and the importance of interprofessional collaboration and mutual learning for their careers. These findings revealed that attitudes among healthcare trainees may be positively restructured in the anatomy laboratory, allowing for collaborative care to predominate in current and future clinical practices. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]