Search

Background: In recent years, neonatal hearing screening (NHS) has gained rapid traction in both developed and developing nations. However, the efficacy of these efforts depends on comprehensive standardization across all screening facets. This study aimed to assess the status and quality of NHS by investigating the knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and practices of hearing screening practitioners regarding NHS. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted, and an online questionnaire based on the knowledge-attitude/belief (A/B)-practice model was distributed to all NHS practitioners in Luzhou, western China. Valid questionnaires were examined and uniformly graded. Results: A total of 63 valid questionnaires were collected. The practitioners were mainly female (96.83%), with nursing backgrounds (63.49%), and undergraduate degrees (66.67%). Most had ≤5 years of experience (74.60%) and had junior/intermediate titles (93.65%). The NHS within the Luzhou area started in 2006 with provincial institutions, expanding to 42 institutions by 2022. Statistically significant correlations were observed between the A/B score and the conducting years of each NHS institution (p <.05) as well as between the Knowledge (K) and Practice (P) scores (p <.01). No significant correlation was found between the K score, P score, A/B score, and working years of practitioners (p >.05), or in the total score of NHS institutions at different levels or in different counties by one-way ANOVA (p >.05). Conclusions: It has been 17 years since the first medical institution in Luzhou launched NHS, and the overall performance of practitioners from different institutions has been consistent in terms of their knowledge, attitudes, or level of practice. However, there is room for further improvement in both the professional development of individuals and aspects related to work, such as health education and long-term follow-up. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Neonatal hearing screening (NHS) is a critical public health measure for early identification of hearing loss, ensuring timely access to interventions that can dramatically improve a child's language development, cognitive abilities, and social inclusion. Beyond clinical benefits, NHS provides long-term advantages in education and quality of life. Given that congenital hearing loss affects approximately 1–2 in every 1000 newborns worldwide, the case for universal screening is clear. Countries like the United States and Australia have successfully implemented NHS, leading to earlier diagnoses, improved language development, and better educational outcomes. In Europe, while many nations have adopted NHS, consistency remains a challenge. Countries such as Norway and the United Kingdom stand out for their well-established systems, whereas others, like Greece, have made notable progress but have yet to mandate NHS nationwide. This highlights the need for cohesive national policies across Europe to ensure universal coverage. Screening methods such as Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions (TEOAE) and Automated Auditory Brainstem Response (AABR) are established tools for detecting hearing impairments in neonates. Despite their demonstrated efficacy, NHS remains inconsistent globally, particularly in low- and middle-income regions that lack mandatory policies or access to reliable screening technologies. This perspective advocates for the urgent need to make NHS mandatory in all countries, emphasizing its societal benefits and cost-effectiveness. Early diagnosis supports prompt intervention, like hearing aids or cochlear implants, which are most effective when implemented before six months. It also empowers families to make informed decisions, fosters educational inclusion, and mitigates the social and emotional challenges of undiagnosed hearing loss. Policymakers, healthcare providers, and international organizations must prioritize universal NHS to ensure no child is left behind due to unaddressed hearing loss. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Syndromic hearing loss (SHL) is characterized by distinctive clinical phenotypes as well as genetic and phenotypic heterogeneity. More than 400 species of SHL have been described, the majority of which are autosomal dominant. Methods: 11 forms of SHL were obtained from 14 unrelated families with probands ranging in age from 5 to 78 months. The results of whole exome sequencing(WES), audiological characteristics, middle and inner ear radiological findings, and additional clinical phenotype characteristics were retrospectively analyzed. Results: Fourteen people with SHL were found. Two of them had Waardenburg syndrome, two had Branchio-Oto-Renal syndrome, two had CHARGE syndrome, and one had Treacher Collins syndrome, Kleefstra syndrome, Muenke syndrome, Osteopathia Striata with Cranial Sclerosis, Ayme-Gripp syndrome, Tatton-Brown-Rahman syndrome, Stickler syndrome, or Stapes Ankylosis with Broad Thumbs and Toes. In this investigation, ten variants were first reported. Discussion: The combination of a neonatal hearing screening and WES can diagnose syndrome-type hearing loss in infancy and childhood, according to our findings, expansion of the gene variant spectrum and phenotype for various age groups of SHL is essential and can provide valuable guidelines for clinical intervention decisions. It is imperative for medical practitioners to conduct diligent and prolonged patient monitoring due to the inherent variability in both the auditory impairment and the comprehensive clinical manifestation of SHL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Universal newborn hearing screening has been successfully implemented in many places around the world, and it is recommended that cases with risk factors for hearing loss be followed-up regardless of hearing screening results. However, there is a need for clarity regarding the recommended rate of follow-up and which tests should be performed. The aim of this study was to assess the audiologic follow-up program for the group with risk factors. Method: Our retrospective study involved children of various ages with a risk factor for hearing loss who passed the initial neonatal hearing test but were later diagnosed with hearing loss. Out of 113,708 children born at Hadassah University Medical Center during the years 2013–2021, 6763 were at risk of hearing loss, and their follow-up audiologic test results were studied. Results: Audiologic testing including ABR, OAE, tympanometry and behavioral audiometry was performed in 1534 of 6763 (23%) of the risk factor group that returned to the hospital. In total, 73 children (4.7%) were diagnosed with hearing loss, 54 of whom failed the initial screening and 19 who had passed it. Further examination of the children that passed the initial screening and were later diagnosed with a hearing loss revealed that four cases had been missed in screening (one familial mild hearing loss, one familial progressive loss, one premature infant with a high tone loss, and one NICU graduate with CNS involvement). Another nine cases had late-onset hearing loss (three meningitis, five CMV, and one with a mitochondrial disease). An additional six cases were diagnosed late, and the age of onset of the hearing loss was unknown (two intubated, two with hydrocephalus, one with Cerebral Palsy, and one with general developmental delay). Conclusions: These results reveal the importance of implementing a refined protocol for monitoring hearing in the high-risk group of children that pass neonatal hearing screening with respect to which hearing tests should be conducted, at what age, and the duration of follow-up. Also, barriers to follow-up must be dealt with, and parents should be more involved in the monitoring process. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The main aim of this study was to explore the psycho-social impacts of Otoacoustic Emissions (OAE) screenings on families. This involved understanding the initial responses of parents to test results, identifying any resulting concerns, and acknowledging the coping mechanisms utilized to handle these unexpectedly encountered difficulties. This retrospective observational study was conducted from January 2021 to December 2022 at a tertiary care facility. An extensive assessment was carried out on 1100 newborns that had undergone the OAE screening. Parental emotional reactions, worries regarding their child's prospects, and employed coping mechanisms were determined using structured questionnaires and interviews. The study aimed to explore the link between socio-economic status and varying levels of post-test anxiety and to study the effect of immediate post-screening counselling. A notable emotional reaction was observed, with 85% of parents, whose neonates were advised for subsequent tests, showing signs of shock and denial. Apprehensions related to the child's growth and societal acceptance were dominant, with 70% parents concerned about potential hurdles. There was a marked correlation between a lower socio-economic status and elevated post-test anxiety. Prompt counselling post-screening resulted in a substantial reduction in parental stress and anxiety levels. While the relevance of OAE testing concerning neonatal health is unequivocal, the psycho-social repercussions it imposes on families are significant. The findings underscore the need for holistic healthcare approaches that not only focus on physiological outcomes but also prioritize the mental well-being of families. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Recent studies showed that COVID-19 infection can affect cochleo-vestibular system. The possibility of a vertical transmission is controversial. Some studies suggested that it is possible but unlikely, others find no evidence of vertical transmission. The objective of this study was to investigate whether exposure to COVID-19 during pregnancy or at birth has an impact on the hearing of the offspring. As part of the national hearing screening program, we performed in all newborns between January 2022 and February 2023, TEOAEs (Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions) at birth and at 3 months. For those "REFER" at the third month test, we performed aABR (Automatic Auditory Brainstem Response) at 6 months. We analysed separately result between infants born to COVID-positive mothers during pregnancy and those born to COVID-negative mothers. To statistical verify differences we performed "Chi-square test". We enrolled a total of 157 infants, of whom 16 were born to mothers who had a molecular PCR test positive for COVID-19. In the latter we tested a total of 32 ears and only 1 ear (3,1%) resulted "REFER". On the other hand, in the control group we tested a total of 282 ears and 22 (7,8%) were found to be "REFER". Our study showed no significant differences in audiological assessment between newborns exposed to COVID-19 infection during pregnancy or at birth compared to the unexposed group. However, further studies with a larger patient's sample will be necessary for a more comprehensive evaluation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Childhood hearing loss is a global health concern. Despite the proven benefits of neonatal hearing screening (NHS), it is not yet mandated in South Africa. The lack of awareness of hearing loss and absence of NHS leads to delayed diagnosis and adverse developmental outcomes for affected children. Aim: The study aimed to assess the availability of NHS services across primary healthcare (PHC) facilities in the City of Cape Town (CCT). Setting: Surveys were conducted with 26 PHC facilities in the CCT metropolitan areas that offer mother and child healthcare services. Methods: Surveys gathered data through online and telephone methods. The surveys aimed to assess the availability and nature of NHS services, care pathways and training of healthcare professionals regarding NHS. Results: None of the facilities used objective screening methods to screen hearing or have standardised care pathways for at-risk babies. Instead, they relied on parental concerns, with the use of the Road to Health book. None of the respondents reported having received hearing screening training, and the majority of participants (62%) lacked confidence in their knowledge of ear and hearing care. Conclusion: The absence of NHS services highlights the need for standardised protocols and increased awareness among healthcare workers and caregivers. Implementing NHS services could facilitate earlier diagnosis and intervention of hearing loss for infants in the Western Cape. Contribution: This study’s findings could guide efforts to improving access to NHS access at PHC level in Cape Town, ultimately providing early hearing screening services to infants.

Neonatal hearing screening (NHS) is a critical public health measure for early identification of hearing loss, ensuring timely access to interventions that can dramatically improve a child’s language development, cognitive abilities, and social inclusion. Beyond clinical benefits, NHS provides long-term advantages in education and quality of life. Given that congenital hearing loss affects approximately 1–2 in every 1000 newborns worldwide, the case for universal screening is clear. Countries like the United States and Australia have successfully implemented NHS, leading to earlier diagnoses, improved language development, and better educational outcomes. In Europe, while many nations have adopted NHS, consistency remains a challenge. Countries such as Norway and the United Kingdom stand out for their well-established systems, whereas others, like Greece, have made notable progress but have yet to mandate NHS nationwide. This highlights the need for cohesive national policies across Europe to ensure universal coverage. Screening methods such as Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions (TEOAE) and Automated Auditory Brainstem Response (AABR) are established tools for detecting hearing impairments in neonates. Despite their demonstrated efficacy, NHS remains inconsistent globally, particularly in low- and middle-income regions that lack mandatory policies or access to reliable screening technologies. This perspective advocates for the urgent need to make NHS mandatory in all countries, emphasizing its societal benefits and cost-effectiveness. Early diagnosis supports prompt intervention, like hearing aids or cochlear implants, which are most effective when implemented before six months. It also empowers families to make informed decisions, fosters educational inclusion, and mitigates the social and emotional challenges of undiagnosed hearing loss. Policymakers, healthcare providers, and international organizations must prioritize universal NHS to ensure no child is left behind due to unaddressed hearing loss.

Introduction: Gestational diabetes is a potential risk factor for neonatal hearing loss. Increased circulating sugars in mothers during pregnancy can impairs the micro circulation and can cause congenital anomalies of the inner ear resulting in congenital hearing loss. This study attempts to find the incidence of neonatal hearing loss among diabetic mothers. Methodology: This was a case control study with 86 neonates of diabetic mothers as cases and neonates of non diabetic mothers(n = 86) as controls. Antenatal diabetic history and sugar values of mothers were documented. Hearing status of the neonates were tested using DPOAE test and ABR test. DPOAE test was done on 3rd day and those who did not get a positive response underwent 2nd DPOAE and also ABR test if 2nd DPOAE was negative. Results: All neonates underwent DPOAE test and few were lost on follow up. First and second DPOAE showed a statistically significant difference between cases and controls. All babies who underwent ABR test had abnormal waveforms. 98% of cases showed moderate and severe bilateral hearing loss whereas all controls had only mild bilateral hearing loss. Discussion: This study showed a significantly higher percentage of abnormal hearing outcome among neonates of diabetic mothers than non diabetic mothers. This could be because of the toxic effects of maternal hyperglycemia on developing auditory system of the fetus. This study emphasis the need for better glycaemic control in diabetic pregnancy, the importance of early and mandatory hearing screening in newborns of diabetic mothers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Universal newborn hearing screening has been successfully implemented in many places around the world, and it is recommended that cases with risk factors for hearing loss be followed-up regardless of hearing screening results. However, there is a need for clarity regarding the recommended rate of follow-up and which tests should be performed. The aim of this study was to assess the audiologic follow-up program for the group with risk factors. Method: Our retrospective study involved children of various ages with a risk factor for hearing loss who passed the initial neonatal hearing test but were later diagnosed with hearing loss. Out of 113,708 children born at Hadassah University Medical Center during the years 2013–2021, 6763 were at risk of hearing loss, and their follow-up audiologic test results were studied. Results: Audiologic testing including ABR, OAE, tympanometry and behavioral audiometry was performed in 1534 of 6763 (23%) of the risk factor group that returned to the hospital. In total, 73 children (4.7%) were diagnosed with hearing loss, 54 of whom failed the initial screening and 19 who had passed it. Further examination of the children that passed the initial screening and were later diagnosed with a hearing loss revealed that four cases had been missed in screening (one familial mild hearing loss, one familial progressive loss, one premature infant with a high tone loss, and one NICU graduate with CNS involvement). Another nine cases had late-onset hearing loss (three meningitis, five CMV, and one with a mitochondrial disease). An additional six cases were diagnosed late, and the age of onset of the hearing loss was unknown (two intubated, two with hydrocephalus, one with Cerebral Palsy, and one with general developmental delay). Conclusions: These results reveal the importance of implementing a refined protocol for monitoring hearing in the high-risk group of children that pass neonatal hearing screening with respect to which hearing tests should be conducted, at what age, and the duration of follow-up. Also, barriers to follow-up must be dealt with, and parents should be more involved in the monitoring process.

Second-level hospitals face peculiarities that make it difficult to implement hearing rescreening protocols, which is also common in other settings. This study analyzes the hearing rescreening process in these kinds of hospitals. A total of 1130 individuals were included; in this cohort, 61.07% were hospital newborns who failed their first otoacoustic emission test after birth (n = 679) or were unable to perform the test (n = 11), and who were then referred to an outpatient clinic. The remaining 38.93% were individuals born in another hospital with their first test conducted in the outpatient clinic (n = 440). A high number of rescreenings were made outside of the recommended time frame, mainly in children referred from another hospital. There was a high lost-to-follow-up rate, especially regarding otolaryngologist referrals. Neonatal hearing screening at second-level hospitals is difficult because of staffing and time constraints. This results in turnaround times that are longer than recommended, interfering with the timely detection of hearing loss. This is particularly serious in outpatient children with impaired screening. Referral to out-of-town centers leads to unacceptable follow-up loss. Legislative support for all these rescreening issues is necessary. In this article, these findings are discussed and some solutions are proposed.

Abstract Background To evaluate the incidence of hearing loss in neonates in our secondary care hospital under pilot UNHS programme. To assess association between various risk factors and neonatal hearing loss. Methods Prospective, observational cohort study was done in a secondary level hospital in North India after ethical approval, for 1 year. Inclusion criteria are as follows: neonates born in hospital during study period, consenting to testing. Exclusion criteria are as follows: sick neonates, non-consenting parents. Neonates underwent TEOAE at 48 h of birth; those failing retested at 1 month. Neonates failing 2nd stage are tested after 3 months using BERA. Neonates were evaluated for the presence of maternal/neonatal high-risk factors. Results Out of 506 neonates, 143 passed 1st OAE screening, 363 were refer, and referral rate is 71.7%. A total of 341/345 neonates passed 2nd stage; 4 were diagnosed with hearing loss on BERA at 3 months. (18 neonates lost to follow-up, excluded from final cohort.) Overall incidence of hearing loss was 0.82%, 1.08% for males and 0.44% for females (p = 0.87, NS). One-hundred nine neonates were high risk (prematurity, 36; consanguinity, 4; caesarean section for relevant indications, 68; craniofacial abnormalities, 1). Incidence of hearing loss for high-risk group was 1.83% and 0.53% for well-born neonates (p = 0.19, NS). Conclusion Incidence of hearing loss in our district in North India is as follows: 8.2 per 1000 live births for well neonates, 18.3 per 1000 live births for high-risk neonates, and respective overall national incidence rates were 1.59 to 8.8 per 1000 and 7 to 49 per 1000. UNHS programmes must be implemented in all hospitals; protocol may be varied according to local population profile and resources available.

Background To evaluate the incidence of hearing loss in neonates in our secondary care hospital under pilot UNHS programme. To assess association between various risk factors and neonatal hearing loss. Methods Prospective, observational cohort study was done in a secondary level hospital in North India after ethical approval, for 1 year. Inclusion criteria are as follows: neonates born in hospital during study period, consenting to testing. Exclusion criteria are as follows: sick neonates, non-consenting parents. Neonates underwent TEOAE at 48 h of birth; those failing retested at 1 month. Neonates failing 2nd stage are tested after 3 months using BERA. Neonates were evaluated for the presence of maternal/neonatal high-risk factors. Results Out of 506 neonates, 143 passed 1st OAE screening, 363 were refer, and referral rate is 71.7%. A total of 341/345 neonates passed 2nd stage; 4 were diagnosed with hearing loss on BERA at 3 months. (18 neonates lost to follow-up, excluded from final cohort.) Overall incidence of hearing loss was 0.82%, 1.08% for males and 0.44% for females (p = 0.87, NS). One-hundred nine neonates were high risk (prematurity, 36; consanguinity, 4; caesarean section for relevant indications, 68; craniofacial abnormalities, 1). Incidence of hearing loss for high-risk group was 1.83% and 0.53% for well-born neonates (p = 0.19, NS). Conclusion Incidence of hearing loss in our district in North India is as follows: 8.2 per 1000 live births for well neonates, 18.3 per 1000 live births for high-risk neonates, and respective overall national incidence rates were 1.59 to 8.8 per 1000 and 7 to 49 per 1000. UNHS programmes must be implemented in all hospitals; protocol may be varied according to local population profile and resources available. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Second-level hospitals face peculiarities that make it difficult to implement hearing rescreening protocols, which is also common in other settings. This study analyzes the hearing rescreening process in these kinds of hospitals. A total of 1130 individuals were included; in this cohort, 61.07% were hospital newborns who failed their first otoacoustic emission test after birth (n = 679) or were unable to perform the test (n = 11), and who were then referred to an outpatient clinic. The remaining 38.93% were individuals born in another hospital with their first test conducted in the outpatient clinic (n = 440). A high number of rescreenings were made outside of the recommended time frame, mainly in children referred from another hospital. There was a high lost-to-follow-up rate, especially regarding otolaryngologist referrals. Neonatal hearing screening at second-level hospitals is difficult because of staffing and time constraints. This results in turnaround times that are longer than recommended, interfering with the timely detection of hearing loss. This is particularly serious in outpatient children with impaired screening. Referral to out-of-town centers leads to unacceptable follow-up loss. Legislative support for all these rescreening issues is necessary. In this article, these findings are discussed and some solutions are proposed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective To establish a monitoring system and a standard database system for neonatal hearing screening program and evaluate its effect. Methods The hearing screening data of newborns in Nanjing in 2021 from the neonatal hearing screening information system of Jiangsu Province were selected as the experimental group, and the manual registration data of neonatal hearing screening in Nanjing in 2020 were selected as the control group. The initial screening rate, re-screening rate, referral rate and hearing impairment disease management rate of neonates were compared between two groups. Results The initial screening rate, re-screening rate and referral rate of neonatal hearing screening in the information management system were 99.27%,85.73% and 91.60% respectively, which were significantly higher than those in the manual registration control group (96.94%, 68.36% and 66.20%, P

An early diagnosis and intervention for congenital cytomegalovirus infection can reduce long‐term disability; however, the introduction of universal neonatal screening has been controversial worldwide. The present study clarified the outcome of a targeted screening protocol for detecting congenital cytomegalovirus infection based on suggestive perinatal conditions. In addition, the positive rate was compared to those from the reported studies and the validity of the targeted screening criteria was discussed. A total of 2121 newborn infants were admitted to our hospital between October 2018 and October 2021. Cytomegalovirus DNA was examined by the isothermal nucleic acid amplification method for urine samples from newborns with any of the following: microcephaly, abnormal ultrasound findings in the brain and visceral organs, repeated failure in neonatal hearing screening, suspicious maternal cytomegalovirus infection during pregnancy, and other abnormal findings suggestive of congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Among 2121 newborns, 102 (4.8%) were subject to the urine cytomegalovirus DNA test based on the abovementioned criteria. Of them, three were cytomegalovirus DNA‐positive. According to the protocol, the cytomegalovirus DNA‐positive rates were 0.14% among the total enrollment of 2121 newborns and 2.9% (3/102) among the targeted newborns. This protocol may overlook congenital cytomegalovirus infection that is asymptomatic or exhibits inapparent clinical manifestations only at birth; however, it is feasible and helps lead to the diagnosis of congenital cytomegalovirus infection that may otherwise be overlooked. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Early identification of hearing loss through newborn hearing screening followed by an early start of intervention has proven to be effective in promoting speech and language development in children with hearing loss. During the COVID-19 pandemic, newborn hearing screening was postponed for a group of newborns in the Netherlands. Therefore, meeting the guidelines for early identification was at risk. In this study, we examine parental attitudes, beliefs, and experiences concerning the hearing screening during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our results indicated that parents (n = 1053) were very positive about newborn hearing screening and their experiences with the screening, even during the COVID-19 pandemic. Parents’ beliefs on the information provision around newborn hearing screening were more inconsistent. The results showed that parents with a postponed hearing screening felt less informed about the hearing screening than parents without a postponed screening. Furthermore, child and family characteristics affected how parents experienced newborn hearing screening. Parents with a premature child were more worried about the hearing abilities of their child before the screening took place. The results also indicate that deafness in the family might lead to parental worries around newborn hearing screening.

IntroductionNeonates undergo neonatal hearing screening to detect congenital hearing loss at an early stage. Once confirmed, it is necessary to perform an etiological workup to start appropriate treatment. The study objective was to assess the different etiologies, risk factors, and hearing results of infants with permanent hearing loss and to evaluate the efficacy and consequences of the different screening devices over the last 21 years.MethodsWe conducted a single-center retrospective cohort analysis for all neonatal hearing screening program referrals and performed an etiological workup in case of confirmed hearing loss. We analyzed the evolution of the etiological protocols based on these results.ResultsThe governmental neonatal hearing screening program referred 545 infants to our center. Hearing loss was confirmed in 362 (66.4%) infants and an audiological workup was performed in 458 (84%) cases. 133 (24.4%) infants were diagnosed with permanent hearing loss. Ninety infants (56 bilateral and 34 unilateral) had sensorineural hearing loss, and the degree was predominantly moderate or profound. The most common etiology in bilateral sensorineural hearing loss was a genetic etiology (32.1%), and in unilateral sensorineural hearing loss, an anatomical abnormality (26.5%). Familial history of hearing loss was the most frequently encountered risk factor.ConclusionThere is a significant number of false positives after the neonatal hearing screening. Permanent hearing loss is found only in a limited number of infants. During the 21 years of this study, we noticed an increase in etiological diagnoses, especially genetic causes, due to more advanced techniques. Genetic causes and anatomical abnormalities are the most common etiology of bilateral and unilateral sensorineural hearing loss, respectively, but a portion remains unknown after extensive examinations.

Congenital hearing loss is hearing loss present in a child at birth or soon after birth. It is a debilitating condition with the potential for lifelong disability. It is thought to be multifactorial in aetiology with both genetic (autosomal and X-linked) and acquired causes (such as maternal infections, drug intake, trauma). Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) is a relatively common condition found in pregnant females but is a rather understudied risk factor in terms of congenital hearing loss. GDM is easily treatable which makes the hearing loss due to it easily preventable. (1) Determine correlation between Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and congenital hearing loss in neonates. (2) Calculate the prevalence of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus related congenital hearing loss. A two-step screening process was used for hearing evaluation of neonates with normal mothers (non-exposed) and neonates with mothers suffering from GDM (exposed) through Otoacoustic emission (OAE) and Brainstem Evoked Response Audiometry (BERA). (1) The difference of neonates diagnosed with hearing impairment in exposed and non-exposed group was statistically significant with a p-value of 0.024. OR 2.1538 95% CI 0.6120–7.5796, p < 0.05. (2) Prevalence of hearing loss in neonates of GDM mothers: 13.3%. Through rigorous exclusion of the already known risk factors for congenital hearing loss, Gestational Diabetes Mellitus has been isolated as an independent risk factor for neonatal hearing impairment. We hope to identify additional cases of congenital hearing loss early leading to a decrease in disease burden. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To evaluate the impact of the Universal Neonatal Hearing Screening (UNHS) on the age at diagnosis, beginning of treatment, and first cochlear implant surgery. Methods: A retrospective cohort study with children up to 12 years old with bilateral hearing loss were divided into two groups: patients who underwent UNHS and the ones who didn't. The groups were compared according to their age at the beginning of the evaluation at a specialized center, at the beginning of the intervention, and, for the ones who had indication, at the cochlear implant surgery. The group who underwent UNHS was divided between the ones who passed the screening test and the ones who didn't. They were compared according to their ages at the same moments as the first two groups. Results: 135 patients were included. The median age at the first appointment in a specialized center was 1.42 (0.50 and 2.50) years, at the beginning of treatment 2.00 (1.00 and 3.52) years, and the cochlear implant surgery 2.83 (1.83 and 4.66) years. Children who underwent UNHS were younger than those who didn't, at the three evaluated moments (p < 0.001). In a subanalysis, children who passed the UNHS but were later diagnosed with hearing loss reached the first appointment with a specialist and started treatment older than those who failed the tests. Conclusion: Performing UNHS interfered with the timing of deafness diagnosis and treatment. However, children who passed the screening but were later diagnosed with hearing loss were the category with the most important delay.

Background: Hearing loss is one of the most common congenital disorders. The Early Diagnosis and Intervention Process is designed for the early diagnosis and intervention of hearing loss in infants. The present study aimed to examine the results of Early Hearing Detection and Intervention (EHDI) in northeastern Iran from 2005 to 2019. Setting: Northeastern Iran. Methods: In most cases, the two-stage protocol (otoacoustic emissions [OAE] and automated auditory brainstem response [AABR]) has been used. Infant assessment methods included the use of OAE, ABR, auditory steady-state response, high-frequency tympanometry, and behavioral audiometry. Interventions included medical interventions, hearing rehabilitation, hearing aids, and cochlear implants. Results: 1,162,821 infants were screened. The screening coverage increased from less than 1% in 2005 to about 99% in 2018. The referral rate has been about 1%. 2.17 out of every 1000 infants are hearing impaired, and the most common cases are bilateral hearing loss and mild to moderate hearing loss. Conclusions: During 2005 to 2019 the coverage rate reached to more than 95% of live births. To improve the EHDI process in this population, better follow-up of diagnosed neonates and expansion of diagnostic and intervention services are needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Currently, the neonatal hearing screening program in our country is of great relevance for the early detection of hearing disorders in newborns and can be performed from the first hours of life in the nursery, providing the mother with information about the hearing status of her little newborn and in case of hearing loss, carry out an early diagnosis that allows the specialist to provide specific treatment and / or auditory rehabilitation to the pediatric patient for the acquisition and development of oral language that will allow him to integrate into the world of listeners. From 2007 to 2021, a total of 3,496 neonates have been evaluated at the «Federico Gómez» Children's Hospital of Mexico (HIMFG) within the Neonatal Hearing Screening program. In the present study, a retrospective and descriptive review of the results obtained in the screened patients from 2019 to 2021 was carried out, which demonstrates the relevance of implementing neonatal hearing screening and early intervention (TANIT) programs in all the institutions of first, second and third level of attention to maternal and child health, that allows to channel the neonate with the specialist doctor Audiologist reducing the time to carry out an early diagnosis and a treatment and/or auditory rehabilitation of patients with hearing loss. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Hearing loss has long been associated with congenital hypothyroidism and, if not noticed and treated early, may result in delayed language acquisition and difficulties in comprehension. In light of the implications of congenital hypothyroidism and its associated hearing loss, we decided to conduct this study. The aim of this study was to identify the prevalence of hearing loss in congenital hypothyroidism and its relation to the severity of the disease and age of initiation of treatment. This study was conducted from July 2016 to June 2021 at a tertiary care hospital in Bhopal. The hearing status of congenital hypothyroid children and matched controls was assessed by pure tone audiometry or free field audiometry and, in selected cases, with brainstem evoked response audiometry. Eight children (25%) with congenital hypothyroidism had hearing loss, compared to one (3.12%) in the control group (p < 0.05). No statistically significant difference has been found in the gender, mean age of diagnosis, mean age of initiation of levothyroxine treatment, mean screening FT4 levels, and mean screening TSH levels between congenital hypothyroid children with and without hearing loss. Due to the high prevalence of hearing loss in congenital hypothyroidism and its impact on language and cognitive development, it is critical to create awareness among healthcare professionals that children diagnosed with congenital hypothyroidism must undergo audiological evaluation at the time of diagnosis and periodically thereafter. Alternatively, children with unexplained hearing loss must be screened for congenital hypothyroidism. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: In 2015 a new regulation and guidelines for the universal newborn hearing screening by AABR measurement have been implemented in Hungary. The aim of our study was to analyse (1) the past 5 years of data from our diagnostic centre about the incidence and types of congenital hearing losses, and (2) the first experiences with the National Newborn Hearing Screening Registry, started in 2019, and (3) the influence of the screening on the pediatric cochlear implant program. Methods: 1269 children referred to our diagnostic centre between 2017 and 2021 were investigated. A third AABR measurement and full audiological evaluation were performed. Furthermore, one-year period data of the screening registry, and the number of implanted children at or under the age of 3 were analysed using the national databases. Results: Altogether 276 newborns (22% of the referred cases after the two-stage screening) had hearing loss, 134 (49%) out of them was conductive origin, almost twice frequent in male as in female. Permanent sensorineural hearing impairment was found in 142 (51%), 58 (40%) of them had bilateral, severe to profound hearing loss, occurring more frequently in male as in female. The national digital registration of the screening data within 12 months concerned 68%. The number of early cochlear implantation in one year increased from 1 to 23 children in the past 15 years. Conclusion: A third AABR after the two-stage screening increased the efficiency and filtered the 78% false-positive cases. The audiological diagnostics verified and typed the hearing losses ensuring the early intervention. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study aims to find out the prevalence of hearing impairment in neonates of mothers with diabetes mellitus. The objective is to assess any correlation between the glycemic control and the development of neonatal hearing impairment. A total of 120 neonates of diabetic mothers were included in the study. Data was collected from hospital medical records, direct interview of parent or care taker and clinical examination of child done whenever possible. 120 Neonates were evaluated by OAE soon after birth. Those who failed the test are evaluated with BERA and results were statistically analysed. In our study prevalence of deafness in neonates of mothers with diabetes mellitus was 4.16%. Prevalence of hearing impairment was higher in neonates of mothers with pre gestational diabetes (9.09%) than gestational diabetes mellitus (3.06%). Mean of HbA1c was higher in mothers of neonates with hearing impairment than those without hearing impairment. Prevalence of deafness in neonates of mothers with diabetes mellitus was 4.16%, which is about sevena times higher than the prevalence of deafness in neonates without any risk factors. Prevalence was higher in neonates of mothers with pre gestational diabetes than neonates of mothers with gestational diabetes mellitus. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Both auditory brainstem response audiometry (ABR) and otoacoustic emission (OAE) are two widely used tests for a neonatal hearing screening. The OAE is easier to perform, faster, and cost-effective. However, ABR is precise with few false-positive results. We intended to know the sensitivity and specificity of OAE compared to ABR. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 282 neonates in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) at Dhaka. All the neonates had one or more risk factors for hearing impairment (as defined by The Joint Committee of Infant Hearing). All the study subjects were screened by an expert team with a proper environment and machine (GSI AUDIOscreener, Denmark). Initial DPOAE was done within 30 days of age and then ABR, at three months. The results were expressed as “Pass” (probably no hearing impairment) or “Refer” (further evaluation is needed). Results: Among the 282 neonates, 44(15.6%) neonates were referred at the initial screening. However, at ABR it was found that 27 (9.5%) had a hearing impairment. Among these 27, twenty-four were also referred at DPOAE (true positive). But 3 were not detected by DPOAE (false-negative). Other 20 neonates who were referred at DPOAE, were normal at ABR (false-positive). So it was estimated that the sensitivity of DPOAE for identifying hearing loss was 88.9% and the specificity was 92.2%. Conclusion: The DPOAE is a good screening test for neonatal hearing screening with high sensitivity and specificity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To evaluate the impact of the Universal Neonatal Hearing Screening (UNHS) on the age at diagnosis, beginning of treatment, and first cochlear implant surgery. Methods: A retrospective cohort study with children up to 12 years old with bilateral hearing loss were divided into two groups: patients who underwent UNHS and the ones who didn't. The groups were compared according to their age at the beginning of the evaluation at a specialized center, at the beginning of the intervention, and, for the ones who had indication, at the cochlear implant surgery. The group who underwent UNHS was divided between the ones who passed the screening test and the ones who didn’t. They were compared according to their ages at the same moments as the first two groups. Results: 135 patients were included. The median age at the first appointment in a specialized center was 1.42 (0.50 and 2.50) years, at the beginning of treatment 2.00 (1.00 and 3.52) years, and the cochlear implant surgery 2.83 (1.83 and 4.66) years. Children who underwent UNHS were younger than those who didn't, at the three evaluated moments (p < 0.001). In a subanalysis, children who passed the UNHS but were later diagnosed with hearing loss reached the first appointment with a specialist and started treatment older than those who failed the tests. Conclusion: Performing UNHS interfered with the timing of deafness diagnosis and treatment. However, children who passed the screening but were later diagnosed with hearing loss were the category with the most important delay. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Few studies report prevalence rates of hearing loss in newborns for nationwide populations. The Dutch well-baby newborn hearing screening covers almost all eligible children and has high participation rates for follow-up screening rounds and diagnosis. This allows calculating reliable prevalence rates of permanent neonatal hearing loss specified by severity. Methods: Results from the well-baby newborn hearing screening program and diagnostic follow-up of referred children from 2015 to 2019 were included in calculating prevalence rates. Hearing loss was classified according to the degree of severity. Results: A total of 99.7% of 833,318 children eligible for screening were included. A total of 0.3% were referred for audiological diagnostics. Permanent bilateral hearing loss of ≥40 dB was diagnosed in 23.7% of them and unilateral hearing loss in 14.4%. A prevalence rate of 1.23 per 1000 children was found, 0.46 for unilateral hearing loss and 0.76 for bilateral hearing loss. Moderate hearing loss is most common in children with bilateral hearing loss (0.47), followed by profound (0.21) and severe (0.06) hearing loss. In children with unilateral hearing loss, prevalence rates are the highest for profound hearing loss (0.21), followed by moderate (0.16) and severe (0.09) hearing loss. A total of 87.5% of the children were diagnosed within the age of 3 months. Conclusions: Because of the high quality of the Dutch well-baby hearing screening program, reported results approximate true prevalence rates of permanent hearing loss by severity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Literature shows that lower gestational age leads to greater delays in the auditory conduction, which suggests atypical maturation of the brainstem in normal-hearing premature newborns. Our aim is to investigate if there is a difference between the extrauterine and intrauterine maturation of the auditory system in normal-hearing newborns with a very premature (28–31 weeks) or extremely premature (

Background: Hearing loss is one of the most common congenital disorders. The Early Diagnosis and Intervention Process is designed for the early diagnosis and intervention of hearing loss in infants. The present study aimed to examine the results of Early Hearing Detection and Intervention (EHDI) in northeastern Iran from 2005 to 2019. Setting: Northeastern Iran. Methods: In most cases, the two-stage protocol (otoacoustic emissions [OAE] and automated auditory brainstem response [AABR]) has been used. Infant assessment methods included the use of OAE, ABR, auditory steady-state response, high-frequency tympanometry, and behavioral audiometry. Interventions included medical interventions, hearing rehabilitation, hearing aids, and cochlear implants. Results: 1,162,821 infants were screened. The screening coverage increased from less than 1% in 2005 to about 99% in 2018. The referral rate has been about 1%. 2.17 out of every 1000 infants are hearing impaired, and the most common cases are bilateral hearing loss and mild to moderate hearing loss. Conclusions: During 2005 to 2019 the coverage rate reached to more than 95% of live births. To improve the EHDI process in this population, better follow-up of diagnosed neonates and expansion of diagnostic and intervention services are needed.

Introduction: Recently, Interacoustics presented a new otoacoustic emission protocol where the probe pressurizes the ear cavity, thus eliminates the risk of non-assessment (REFER outcome) due to a negative middle ear pressure. This study evaluated the characteristics and the performance of this new protocol on a newborn well-baby population. Methods: One hundred sixty-three newborns (age 2.7 ± 1.1 days) for a total of 294 ears were assessed randomly. Transiently evoked otoacoustic responses were acquired by the Titan device (Interacoustics), using the default and a pressurized TEOAE protocol. The data were analyzed in terms of signal to noise ratios (S/Ns) at 5 frequencies, namely, 0.87, 1.94, 2.96, 3.97, and 4.97 kHz. To assess any possible gestational age (GE) effects on the TEOAE variables, the responses were subdivided in 4 different age subgroups. Results: There were no significant differences between the left and right ear TEOAE responses, for age (in days), GE (in weeks), weight (in grams), and S/N at all 5 frequencies. Considering the pooled 294 ears, paired t tests between the default and the pressurized TEOAE data showed significant differences across all 5 frequencies (p < 0.01). The pressurized protocol generated TEOAE responses presenting larger S/Ns, and a positive additive effect of approximately 2.31 dB was observed at all tested frequencies. There were no significant GE effects on the pressurized TEOAE responses. In terms of performance, both protocols performed equally (same number of PASSes). Conclusion: The pressurized TEOAE protocol generates responses with higher S/Ns which might be useful in borderline cases where the middle ear status might cause a REFER screening outcome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Increased neonatal referral rate of conductive hearing loss (CHL) related to otitis media with effusion (OME) following universal neonatal hearing screening (UNHS) may cause an unnecessary clinical, emotional, and financial burden. This study analyzes the long-term, audiological, and medical characteristics of CHL associated with OME in neonates in order to establish a standardized protocol following technology-driven improvements in detection and referral rates in UNHS. A retrospective study of all neonates with OME-related CHL referred to the University Hospital of Leuven (Belgium) after failing UNHS with the MAICO devices between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2021 was performed. Follow-up consultations, auditory tests, referral side, birth month, hearing loss degree, underlying pathologies and risk factors, time to normalization, and need for ventilation tubes were assessed. The incidence of CHL related to OME was stable between 2013 and 2021. Of all referred infants with OME, 52.3 % demonstrated spontaneous recovery. The average time to hearing normalization was significantly longer in children with underlying congenital pathologies compared to those without. Moreover, 74.4 % of these children received ventilation tubes compared to 32.0 % of children without underlying pathologies. No correlation was found between the incidence of OME-related CHL with either a hearing loss degree, admission to neonatal intensive care, or history of a nasogastric feeding tube. In children who failed UNHS due to OME, hearing recovers spontaneously without surgical intervention in 2/3 of the infants without underlying conditions within one year. In children with underlying congenital disorders, the time to hearing recovery is longer and the risk for surgical intervention is higher, underlining the need for implementing a UNHS standardized protocol. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background The sensorineural hearing loss incidence (SNHL) ranges from 1 to 3 per 1000 live births in term healthy neonates, and 2–4 per 100 in high-risk infants, a 10-fold increase. Objective The aim was to estimate the incidence of SNHL among newborns in NICU at Ahmed Maher Teaching Hospital, Cairo, Egypt, and to describe the distribution of risk factors associated with SNHL and the effects of their interaction. Patients and methods The study was carried out on 710 neonates in a hospital in Cairo, Egypt. A total of 710 (401 males and 309 females) neonates were included in the study and had a birth weight ranging from 680 to 5500 g, and the mean gestational age was 35.8 ± 3 weeks. All the cases were screened for hearing loss using the transient evoked otoacoustic emission device, followed by a second-stage screening for those who failed, and cases were given a Refer then underwent an automated auditory brainstem response test. Results In the studied cases, 76.7% had hyperbilirubinemia, 8.73% were of low birth weight (

Objective: To compare the hearing screening results of two-step transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and one-step automatic auditory brainstem response (AABR) in non-risk newborns, and to explore a more suitable hearing screening protocol for infants discharged within 48 h after birth in remote areas of China.Methods: To analyze the age effect on pass rate for hearing screening, 2005 newborns were divided into three groups according to screening time after birth:

BACKGROUND: In Mexico in 2012, a prevalence of pediatric hearing loss of 1.4 per 1000 births was reported. Early diagnosis, medical follow-up and therapeutic treatment are essential for the optimal integral development of children with hearing loss, thus, the diagnosis before 6 months of age is promoted by means of a neonatal hearing screening. OBJECTIVE: To analyze and evaluate frequent behaviors for which hearing loss is identified in infants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Descriptive cross-sectional study done in April 2019, in which relatives of patients with a diagnosis of hearing loss from a National Health Institute answered a questionnaire whose objective was to know the form and time of detection of hearing impairment. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, joint probability, conditional probability and X2. RESULTS: The modal variables were schooling, mother's age, type of family nucleus, pregnancy number, absence of communicative intention, age at diagnosis by audiological test and auditory perception capacity. The determining behavioral factor for detection was the absence of communicative intention after 12 months of age. CONCLUSIONS: It is necessary to develop campaigns aimed at parents based on behaviors for which hearing loss should be suspected. A relative efficiency of the neonatal hearing screen is perceived in Mexico. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the results of neonatal hearing screening in our hospital with the help of literature and to question and reveal the risk factors to gain healthy individuals and to raise awareness for all health workers and the public who are interested in this subject. METHODS: A total of 16,388 newborn infants were evaluated between October 2009 and January 2018. All newborns were screened with transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) test. Risk factors were investigated. The test repetition and auditory brainstem response (ABR) measurements were performed on newborns who could not pass the TEOAE test and the newborns in the risky group after 15 days. RESULTS: A total of 116 newborns (0.7%) were suspected to have hearing loss. Twenty-seven newborns (0.16%) were found to be in intensive care unit. Twelve newborns (0.07%) had permanent hearing loss. Then, in order: 9 newborns (0.05%) had received phototherapy and 7 newborns (0.04%) were born to consanguineous marriages. In addition, 3 newborns (0.02%) had a low birth weight and 1 newborn (0.006%) had a history of fever. CONCLUSION: Screening tests should be performed in all newborns for early detection of hearing loss. Even though frequency of hearing loss is higher in newborns with risk factors, the treatment should be started within 6 months, the latest, and newborns should be referred for rehabilitation and training. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Universal hearing screening offers unique possibilities for detection of congenital deafness as a consequence of congenital cytomegalovirus (CMVc) infection, so its selective study in the case of a failed test could be a non-negligible screening opportunity while other guidelines covering the possibility of universal screening are adopted. The aim of this study is to analyse the possibility of selective screening for CMVc after an altered hearing test in a regional hospital. During the period studied, the results obtained were unsatisfactory, especially in children born outside the hospital of residence, showing an excessive delay in hearing screening in many cases and in the few cases where CMVc screening could be performed, only 30% had the test ordered in a timely manner. The reasons for this are varied and the solution is to include selective screening for CMVc in the hearing screening programme. This implies shortening the timing of the hearing screening protocol to allow CMVc testing in saliva or urine (preferably) before 21 days of age and providing screening programmes with the necessary staff and time to perform it properly., (Copyright © 2023 Sociedad Española de Otorrinolaringología y Cirugía de Cabeza y Cuello. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Background: Few studies report prevalence rates of hearing loss in newborns for nationwide populations. The Dutch well-baby newborn hearing screening covers almost all eligible children and has high participation rates for follow-up screening rounds and diagnosis. This allows calculating reliable prevalence rates of permanent neonatal hearing loss specified by severity. Methods: Results from the well-baby newborn hearing screening program and diagnostic follow-up of referred children from 2015 to 2019 were included in calculating prevalence rates. Hearing loss was classified according to the degree of severity. Results: A total of 99.7% of 833,318 children eligible for screening were included. A total of 0.3% were referred for audiological diagnostics. Permanent bilateral hearing loss of ≥40 dB was diagnosed in 23.7% of them and unilateral hearing loss in 14.4%. A prevalence rate of 1.23 per 1000 children was found, 0.46 for unilateral hearing loss and 0.76 for bilateral hearing loss. Moderate hearing loss is most common in children with bilateral hearing loss (0.47), followed by profound (0.21) and severe (0.06) hearing loss. In children with unilateral hearing loss, prevalence rates are the highest for profound hearing loss (0.21), followed by moderate (0.16) and severe (0.09) hearing loss. A total of 87.5% of the children were diagnosed within the age of 3 months. Conclusions: Because of the high quality of the Dutch well-baby hearing screening program, reported results approximate true prevalence rates of permanent hearing loss by severity.

Background: Nigeria reportedly has one of the highest incidences of congenital hearing loss and the Universal Neonatal Hearing Screening (UNHS) offers a potential for early detection and intervention. Objectives: To determine the awareness and acceptability of newborn hearing screening among the antenatal clinic attendees of a Nigerian Teaching Hospital. Methods: This study was a cross-sectional survey among the pregnant women attending the antenatal clinic. Data were obtained using semi-structured interviewer-administered questionnaire Results: A total of 114 women aged 18 and 45 years participated in the survey; 51/114 (44.7%) were aware of hearing screening with most of them 39/51 (76.5%) having health workers as their first source of knowledge. A high acceptance rate was obtained among 97/114 (85.1%), and this was notably independent (p = 0.399) of awareness; 14/114 (12.2%) rejected UNHS and the commonest reason for rejection was lack of enough information among 10/14 (71.4%) on the existence and use of UNHS. Health care workers were the commonest source of information [39/51(76.5%)]. A majority [51/58 (87.9%)] thought that the best time to initiate treatment is early in life, before speech development, only 4/114 (3.5%) had relatives who had ever undergone UNHS and all were done abroad. Conclusions: Less than half of the participants attending ANC were aware of hearing screening and acceptance was high despite this low awareness rate. Parental awareness appeared to depend on contact with healthcare workers. Community education may increase awareness and demand for UNHS.

Literature shows that lower gestational age leads to greater delays in the auditory conduction, which suggests atypical maturation of the brainstem in normal-hearing premature newborns. Our aim is to investigate if there is a difference between the extrauterine and intrauterine maturation of the auditory system in normal-hearing newborns with a very premature (28–31 weeks) or extremely premature (<28 weeks) birth. Results of the Automated Auditory Brainstem Response Newborn Hearing Screening Program in Dutch Neonatal Intensive Care Units and diagnostic examinations were centrally registered from 1998 to 2016. Normal-hearing newborns with a gestational age of 25–31 weeks were included. Screening results at 32–45 weeks of postmenstrual age were compared between newborns born with different gestational ages. Multiple imputation was used to predict missing screening results. Small for gestational age was defined as birth weight corrected for gestational age < −1.6 standard deviation. Descriptive and (pooled) logistic regression analyses were performed. 23,964 newborns with 28,754 screening results were eligible. At the same postmenstrual age, pass rates were lower when gestational age was lower in normal-hearing newborns with a very and extremely preterm birth. Pass rates of 80% could be obtained at 34–35, 32–33, and 30–32 weeks' postmenstrual age in newborns with 25, 26–27, 28–31 weeks gestational age, respectively. Small for gestational age had an additional negative effect on pass rates. Analysis of hearing screening data suggests that extrauterine maturation of the auditory system is delayed in normal-hearing newborns with a very or extremely premature birth. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To investigate the Barriers and Priorities accorded by hospital and health administrators to neo-natal hearing screening. Methods: This qualitative exploratory descriptive study employing purposive sampling technique was conducted in Islamabad, over a period of 18 months from 1st August 2015 to 31st January 2017. Sample included the stakeholders i.e., Heads of public sector hospitals of Islamabad including Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences, Capital Hospital, and Federal Government Services Hospital, Islamabad. Study included in depth interviews using a self-structured interview guide and audio recording. Recorded data was transcribed followed by thematic analyses which was manually drawn and verified. Results: The Outcomes from thematic analysis were drawn as Planning, Essential requirements for NNHS, High risk screening, education, Existence of skilled maternal & newborn health workers. Hearing screening equipment//facility instrumentation, Logistic support, Health ministry support and Financial cover are also significant outcomes. Lack of awareness in the public and professionals regarding the importance of early identification of HI, poor health infrastructure, burden on tertiary care and lack of referral top the list of barriers to initiation of NNHS program at hospital administrative level. Conclusion: The Barriers to NNHS identified at Hospital and Health care administrator level include lack of awareness, poor health infrastructure, burden on tertiary care and lack of referrals. Inherent barriers to NNHS cover the spectrum of lack of liaison/linkages between obstetrics and other departments, deliveries at homes especially in rural areas, poor follow-up, scarcity of technical and adequately trained manpower. Intangible barriers to NNHS comprise lack of health care information system, attitudinal barriers, inadequate fiscal resources, and lack of integrated approach at intra departmental levels. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To investigate the variance in reported prevalence rates of permanent neonatal hearing impairment (HI) worldwide. Design: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed on reported prevalence rates of sensorineural and permanent conductive or mixed HI worse than 40 dB in neonates, detected as a result of a screening programme or audiometric study. Study sample: For meta-analysis, 35 articles were selected, 25 from high-income countries and 10 from middle-income countries according to the world bank classification system. Results: The prevalence rate of permanent uni- and bilateral HI worse than 40 dB in neonates varied from 1 to 6 per 1000, the overall prevalence was 2.21 per 1000 [1.71, 2.8]. In NICU populations the prevalence rate was higher with a larger fraction of bilateral cases. Although not significant, prevalence rates were slightly higher in Asia compared to Europe and the number of infants lost to follow-up appeared higher in countries with lower gross national income. Conclusion: Substantial variations exist in prevalence rates of neonatal permanent HI across countries and regions. There is a strong need for more data from low-income countries to identify demographic factors that account for this variability in reported prevalence rates. Reporting these data in a uniform way is advocated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Hearing impairment can have a negative impact on an individual's social, educational, and emotional life. If not detected early, it can affect the speech and language development. This delay in diagnosis and intervention can be mitigated by mandatorily implementing newborn hearing screening protocols. Objective: The primary objective of this study was to find the incidence of hearing loss in normal and high-risk neonates and recommend a protocol for the detection of hearing loss in the neonate. Materials and Methods: The study was carried out in a tertiary care teaching hospital over a period of 12 months. A total of 1000 babies including 693 normal and 307 high-risk babies were enrolled into the study. All neonates underwent otoacoustic emission (OAE) within the first 3 days of birth. Those who failed in this test underwent repeated OAE after 6 weeks, followed by brain stem-evoked response audiometry (BERA) if the second OAE was negative. Results: Of 307 high-risk babies, 48 showed absent OAE on initial screening. On follow-up, 10 babies still showed absent OAE. BERA was positive for hearing loss in five and normal in the other five babies. Among 693 normal neonates, 71 had absent OAE during the first test. On subsequent OAE test, seven babies failed whose BERA showed hearing loss in five and normal hearing in two babies. Conclusion: A proper protocol and methodology is required for the early detection of hearing loss so that rehabilitation can be started at the earliest. In this study, the incidence of hearing loss is found to be more in high-risk neonates as compared to normal ones. As OAE is simple and quick, it is preferred for screening, but BERA is required for the definitive diagnosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Congenital hearing loss is a multifactorial disease that affects mostly premature newborns exposed to certain risk factors. The recent widespread introduction of newborn hearing screening in Tîrgu Mureş, Romania prompted the need for a multidisciplinary centralized study on the subject.

According to the World Health Organization, the incidence of hearing impairment in newborn population is 1-3 per 1000 (WHO, 2012). Apart from that, many authors have found that the incidence of hearing impairment is twenty times higher, 2-4%, in neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Thus, a congenital hearing loss is the most frequent sensory or motor deficit that could be diagnosed immediately upon birth. The objective of this study was to determine the incidence of risk factors for hearing impairment in the population of preterm babies. We were especially interested in the impact of gestational age at birth on the incidence of risk factors for hearing loss. A cohort of 150 preterm babies was enrolled in the study. They were hospitalized in the Institute for Neonatology in Belgrade during 2014 and 2015 and the data were obtained from their medical files. The results of this study indicate high incidence of risk factors for hearing impairment in this population of babies. Gestational age at birth had a strong, statistically significant, correlation with risk factor incidence in lower gestational age and vice versa. High incidence of risk factors and their interaction could account for twenty times higher occurrence of congenital and early acquired hearing loss in population of preterm babies compared to term neonates. These results imply the need for systematic audiological surveillance of prematurely born babies at least until 12 months of corrected age.