Search

Background: The role of quantitative flow ratio (QFR) in the treatment of nonculprit vessels of patients with myocardial infarction (MI) is a topic of ongoing discussion., Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the predictive capability of QFR for adverse events and its noninferiority compared to wire-based functional assessment in nonculprit vessels of MI patients., Methods: The FIRE (Functional Assessment in Elderly MI Patients With Multivessel Disease) trial randomized 1,445 older MI patients to culprit-only (n = 725) or physiology-guided complete revascularization (n = 720). In the culprit-only arm, angiographic projections of nonculprit vessels were prospectively collected, centrally reviewed for QFR computation, and associated with endpoints. In the complete revascularization arm, endpoints were compared between nonculprit vessels investigated with QFR or wire-based functional assessment. The primary endpoint was the vessel-oriented composite endpoint (VOCE) at 1 year., Results: QFR was measured on 903 nonculprit vessels from 685 patients in the culprit-only arm. Overall, 366 (40.5%) nonculprit vessels showed a QFR value ≤0.80, with a significantly higher incidence of VOCEs (22.1% vs 7.1%; P < 0.001). QFR ≤0.80 emerged as an independent predictor of VOCEs (HR: 2.79; 95% CI: 1.64-4.75). In the complete arm, QFR was used in 320 (35.2%) nonculprit vessels to guide revascularization. When compared with propensity-matched nonculprit vessels in which treatment was guided by wire-based functional assessment, no significant difference was observed (HR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.28-1.15) in VOCEs., Conclusions: This prespecified subanalysis of the FIRE trial provides evidence supporting the safety and efficacy of QFR-guided interventions for the treatment of nonculprit vessels in MI patients. (Functional Assessment in Elderly MI Patients With Multivessel Disease [FIRE]; NCT03772743)., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures The data supporting this paper are accessible upon reasonable request to the FIRE Study Executive Committee. Sahajanand Medical Technologies Ltd, Medis Medical Imaging Systems, Eukon S.r.l., Siemens Healthineers, General Electric Healthcare, and Insight Lifetech provided unrestricted funding to the study sponsor for the conduction of the trial. These companies had no involvement in the trial design, data collection, analysis, interpretation, or writing of the manuscript. Dr Campo has received research grants and personal fees from Abbott Vascular, GADA, Menarini, Amgen, Daichii-Sankyo, and Sanofi outside of the submitted work. Dr Moreno has received speaker/consulting fees from Abbott Vascular, AMGEN, AstraZeneca, Biosensors, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Daiichi-Sankyo, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, and Philips outside of the submitted work. Dr Barbato declares speaker fees from Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Insight Lifetech, outside of the submitted work. Dr Biscaglia has received funding from the Italian Health Minister (Ricerca Finalizzata 2021, GR-2021-12372516) for the conduction of the Functional Coronary Angiography Guided Revascularization in STEMI trial; and has received personal fees from Abbott Vascular outside of the submitted work., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Revascularization of nonculprit arteries in patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) is now recommended based on several trials. However, the optimal therapeutic strategy of nonculprit lesions remains unknown. Murray law-based Quantitative Flow Ratio (μQFR) is a novel, non-invasive, vasodilator-free method for evaluating the functional severity of coronary artery stenosis, which has potential applications for nonculprit lesion assessment in STEMI patients., Material and Methods: Patients with STEMI who received staged PCI before hospital discharge were enrolled retrospectively. μQFR analyses of nonculprit vessels were performed based on both acute and staged angiography., Results: Eighty-four patients with 110 nonculprit arteries were included. The mean acute μQFR was 0.76 ± 0.18, and the mean staged μQFR was 0.75 ± 0.19. The average period between acute and staged evaluation was 8 days. There was a good correlation (r = 0.719, P < 0.001) between acute μQFR and staged μQFR. The classification agreement was 89.09%. The area under the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve for detecting staged μQFR ≤ 0.80 was 0.931., Conclusions: It is feasible to calculate the μQFR during the acute phase of STEMI patients. Acute μQFR and staged μQFR have a good correlation and agreement. The μQFR could be a valuable method for assessing functional significance of nonculprit arteries in STEMI patients.

Background: Nonculprit lesions are closely related to the prognosis of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Our previous research found that ischemic postconditioning (IP) could inhibit the progression of nonculprit lesions. However, the mechanism by which IP regulates the occurrence and development of nonculprit lesions remains unclear., Methods: Firstly, a rabbit ischemia-reperfusion (IR) model was constructed. Next, the morphological characteristics of the coronary arterial tissues and myocardial tissues of the rabbits were observed using hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) staining. Then, western blot was performed to detect the expressions of AT1, Cx43, β-tubulin, Bax, Bcl-2 and cleaved caspase 3. Finally, to further confirm the effect of IP on nonculprit coronary arterial tissues, an in vitro model of oxygen and glucose deprivation/reperfusion (OGD/R) was established., Results: IR notably induced the cells apoptosis in nonculprit coronary arterial tissues and in myocardial tissues, while IR-induced cell apoptosis was significantly inhibited by IP. In addition, IP protected nonculprit coronary arterial tissues against IR via downregulating miR-92a, miR-328 and miR-494 and mRNA AT1, Cx43 and β-tubulin. Consistently, OGD/R-induced injury of Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) was reversed by IP., Conclusions: In this study, IP could protect nonculprit coronary arteries against IR injury via downregulating miR-92a, miR-328 and miR-494. Our findings may provide new directions for the treatment of nonculprit lesions.

Background: The aim of this study was to analyze the feasibility of a physiological coronary evaluation with the instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) of nonculprit lesions in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) successfully revascularized., Methods: A multicenter registry including patients of four high-volume PCI centers with ACS and underwent successful revascularization of the culprit vessel and had other nonculprit lesions that were physiologically evaluated with the iFR between January 2017 and December 2019. The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, probable or definitive stent thrombosis and new revascularization (MACEs)., Results: A total of 356 patients with 472 nonculprit lesions were included. The mean age was 66 ± 11 years. The clinical presentation was ACS without persistent ST-segment elevation (NSTE-ACS) in 235 patients (66%) and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in 121 patients (34%). After a median follow-up period of 21 (14-30) months, the primary endpoint occurred in 32 patients (9%). There were no differences in outcomes regarding clinical presentation (NSTEMI vs. NSTE-ACS, 9.1 vs. 8.9%, p adj  = 0.570) or iFR induced treatment strategy (patients with all lesions revascularized vs. patients with at least one lesion with an iFR > 0.89 deferred for revascularization, 10.5 vs. 8.4%, p adj  = 0.476)., Conclusions: The use of the iFR to guide percutaneous coronary intervention decision making in nonculprit lesions seems to be feasible, with an acceptable percentage of MACEs at the mid-term follow-up. Patients with deferred revascularization of lesions without physiological significance and patients undergoing complete revascularization had a similar risk of MACEs., (© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the prognostic value of fractional flow reserve (FFR) in non-infarct-related arteries (IRAs) in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (MI)., Background: Patients with ST-segment elevation MI often present with multivessel disease. The treatment of non-IRAs is debated. The applicability of FFR has not been widely proved., Methods: Outcomes were analyzed in all patients in the Compare-Acute (Comparison Between FFR Guided Revascularization Versus Conventional Strategy in Acute STEMI Patients With MVD) trial in whom, after successful primary percutaneous coronary intervention, non-IRAs were interrogated using FFR and treated medically. The treating cardiologist was blinded to the FFR value. The primary endpoint was the composite of cardiovascular mortality, target vessel-related (non-IRA with FFR measurement at primary percutaneous coronary intervention) nonfatal MI, and target vessel revascularization: major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 24 months., Results: A total of 751 patients (963 vessels) were included. Target non-IRAs with MACE had lower FFR compared with those without (0.78 vs. 0.84, respectively; p < 0.001). The median FFR of non-IRAs with TVR was lower than that of those without (0.79 vs. 0.85, respectively; p < 0.001). The difference was significant in all vessels. The median FFR of target non-IRAs with MI was lower than that of those without (0.79 vs. 0.84, respectively; p = 0.016). The MACE rate was significantly (p < 0.001) higher in the lowest of FFR tertiles (<0.80) compared with the others (0.80 to 0.87 and ≥0.88)., Conclusions: In patients with ST-segment elevation MI with multivessel disease, FFR measured in the medically treated non-IRA immediately after successful primary percutaneous coronary intervention shows a nonlinear and inverse risk continuum of MACE. Importantly, worsening prognosis is demonstrated around the cutoff of 0.80., (Copyright © 2020 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess whether residual nonculprit (NC) lesions, defined as visual diameter stenosis ≥30% after successful percutaneous coronary intervention, affect the rate of future events in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Background: In patients with acute coronary syndromes, approximately one-half of recurrent events after percutaneous coronary intervention arise from untreated lesions. Methods: Patients enrolled in PROSPECT (Providing Regional Observations to Study Predictors of Events in the Coronary Tree) were divided into 3 groups: those with no NC lesions, 1 NC lesion, or ≥2 NC lesions. Time to events for major adverse cardiac events was estimated up to 3 years. Results: Among 697 patients, 13.3% had no NC lesions, 19.7% had 1 NC lesion, and 67.0% had ≥2 NC lesions. The median diameter stenoses of the NC lesions in the latter 2 groups were 36.7% (interquartile range: 31.0% to 43.4%) and 37.4% (interquartile range: 32.0% to 46.5%), respectively (p = 0.22). At least 1 thin-cap fibroatheroma was present in one-half the patients in each group. At 3 years, the incidence of major adverse cardiac events was 8.5%, 15.2%, and 24.3%, respectively (p = 0.0009). NC lesion–related events occurred in 0%, 5.0%, and 15.9% of patients, respectively (p < 0.0001). Of 105 NC lesion–related clinical events occurring during follow-up, 73 (69.5%) originated from angiographically evident baseline NC lesions (of which 36 had diameter stenosis >50%), while the other 32 arose from normal or near normal segments. Conclusions: Residual NC lesions are common after percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndromes and portend a higher rate of recurrent ischemic events within 3 years, especially when angiographically more severe. Conversely, the absence of NC lesions by angiography is highly predictive of freedom from events not related to the originally treated culprit lesion(s). [Copyright &y& Elsevier]