Search

Introduction: The efficacy and safety of omadacycline have been primarily documented through Phase III clinical trials; however, there are limited data from real-world clinical settings. This study aims to explore the real-world use of omadacycline in China and identify the factors associated with its efficacy. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of medical records for patients treated with omadacycline at a single center from March 2022 to March 2024. We analyzed demographic characteristics, laboratory results, antibiotic regimens, and clinical outcomes. Logistic regression was employed to identify risk factors associated with clinical treatment failure or failure of microbial clearance. Results: A total of 183 patients were included in the final analysis. Clinical success was achieved in 71.0% (130/183) of patients, with a bacterial clearance rate of 61.9% (26/42). Renal impairment was observed in 20.8% (38/183) of patients, with 39.5% (15/38) of these patients receiving nephrotoxic antibiotic treatments. Noteworthy adverse drug reactions were rare during the course of the treatment. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified several independent factors associated with treatment failure: moderate to severe liver damage (OR: 3.073, 95% CI 1.345–7.021, p = 0.008), admission to the respiratory department (OR: 2.573, 95% CI 1.135–5.834, p = 0.024), and a duration of omadacycline therapy of less than 7 days (OR: 3.762, 95% CI 1.626–8.706, p = 0.002). Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that omadacycline treatment can achieve favorable clinical success and bacterial clearance, with positive safety and tolerability outcomes. However, high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to validate these initial findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Appropriate oral antibiotic therapy for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) is a challenge, as current oral treatment guidelines do not fully cover the most common skin pathogens. Both linezolid and omadacycline are available as intravenous or bioequivalent oral formulations. Materials and methods: This post hoc analysis of the OASIS-1 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02378480) and OASIS-2 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02877927) phase 3 trials assessed safety and clinical efficacy of intravenous (IV)-start versus oral (PO)-start therapy in patients treated with omadacycline or linezolid for ABSSSI. In OASIS-1, patients were randomized to IV omadacycline or linezolid, with optional switch to oral therapy, while patients in OASIS-2 received oral omadacycline or linezolid. Treatment was provided for 7–14 days in both studies. The primary endpoint was an early clinical response (ECR) at 48 to 72 h, defined as survival and ≥ 20% reduction in lesion size, without rescue antibacterial therapy. Results: A total of 645 IV-start inpatients and 735 PO-start outpatients were assessed. Median age was 47 years for the IV-start group and 44 years for the PO-start group. Most patients had solely gram-positive infections (97% in each group; ECR [85.2% IV-start and 85.0% PO-start]), and the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) was similar between the groups. The most frequent AEs observed were nausea (11.2% [IV-start] versus 18.9% [PO-start]) and subcutaneous abscess (5.6% [IV-start] versus 1.9% [PO-start]). Discontinuation due to AEs was infrequent in both groups (2% [IV-start] versus 1.2% [PO-start]). Conclusion: Oral therapy is equally efficacious to IV therapy when omadacycline or linezolid is used to treat ABSSSIs. These data strengthen the evidence for oral omadacycline as a therapeutic option for ABSSSI, particularly for patients who have experienced treatment failure because of the limitations of other therapies. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02378480 and NCT02877927. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims/BackgroundChlamydia psittaci is an obligate intracellular bacterium that primarily infects birds, but can cause respiratory infections in humans. Clinical evidence supporting the use of omadacycline for the treatment of Chlamydia psittaci pneumonia remains limited; therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the potential of omadacycline in treating Chlamydia psittaci pneumonia by analyzing the patients' clinical outcomes and the drug safety profile. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 15 patients with Chlamydia psittaci pneumonia treated at the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine between January and December 2023. Following diagnosis with the aid of metagenomic next-generation sequencing, the patients received omadacycline for treatment, and their clinical outcomes and laboratory marker profiles were monitored to assess the treatment efficacy and safety. Results Significant improvements were observed in clinical symptoms and laboratory markers, including C-reactive protein (p < 0.001), procalcitonin (p = 0.001), neutrophil percentage (p < 0.001), and the SpO2/FiO2 ratio (p < 0.001), after treatment with omadacycline. A 100% cure rate was reported within 28 days of treatment initiation, with gastrointestinal disturbances being the most common side effect. Conclusion Omadacycline shows promise in treating Chlamydia psittaci pneumonia and is well tolerated by the users. However, further controlled trials involving larger samples are required to confirm the efficacy and safety of the drug. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Dacryocystitis, inflammation and infection of the lacrimal sac, is most commonly caused by infection from Staphylococcus and Streptococcus species. This report highlights a rare case of chronic dacryocystitis due to the atypical pathogen Mycobacterium abscessus. A 62-year-old woman presented with several months of left medial canthal pain, tenderness, and discharge. Exam demonstrated a left tender medial nodule, and imaging showed left lacrimal sac dilation and fluid collection consistent with dacryocystitis. She underwent external dacryocystorhinostomy with drainage and culture of the abscess, which was positive for M. abscessus. Her post-surgical treatment required an extended course of antibiotics, including omadacycline and azithromycin, with slow but progressive symptomatic improvement. This case is only the second reported case of dacryocystitis due to M. abscessus and suggests a role for culturing lacrimal sac abscesses intraoperatively due to the need for extended antibiotic therapy for atypical infections that may have high antibiotic resistance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: We aimed to develop a rapid, simple, and precise ultra performance liquid chromatography − tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) technique for simultaneous measurement of omadacycline (OMA) and tigecycline (TGC) in the bloodstream of individuals suffering from serious bacterial infections. Methods: All analytes were extracted using a 0.2 % formic acid–water dilution and acetonitrile plasma protein precipitation. The quantification was performed by electrospray ionization-triple quadrupole mass spectrometry with selected reaction monitoring and positive ion mode detection. Tetracycline was used as an internal standard in this experiment, with the mobile phase composed of water (with 0.1 % formic acid) and acetonitrile (using gradient elution) flowing at a rate of 0.35 ml/min, and the column temperature set at 30 °C. Each individual analysis was completed in under 3.5 min. Results: The method was validated based on FDA recommendations, including the assessment of extraction recovery (92.65–101.72 %) and matrix effects (86.22–91.12 %). The standard curve ranges for both OMA and TGC are 0.025 µg/mL to 2.5 µg/mL. The plasma samples were found to be consistent after undergoing three rounds of freezing and thawing at room temperature for 24 h, being placed in an automated sample injector for 24 h, and then frozen for 45 days. Clinical cases were used to demonstrate the application of the therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) assay, showing how an analytical test can quickly provide information on antibiotic levels in patients and impact their treatment. Conclusion: Multiplex UPLC-MS/MS assays for the simultaneous measurement of plasma OMA and TGC concentrations are the ideal choice for clinically TDM applications.

Abstract Introduction Appropriate oral antibiotic therapy for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) is a challenge, as current oral treatment guidelines do not fully cover the most common skin pathogens. Both linezolid and omadacycline are available as intravenous or bioequivalent oral formulations. Materials and methods This post hoc analysis of the OASIS-1 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02378480) and OASIS-2 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02877927) phase 3 trials assessed safety and clinical efficacy of intravenous (IV)-start versus oral (PO)-start therapy in patients treated with omadacycline or linezolid for ABSSSI. In OASIS-1, patients were randomized to IV omadacycline or linezolid, with optional switch to oral therapy, while patients in OASIS-2 received oral omadacycline or linezolid. Treatment was provided for 7–14 days in both studies. The primary endpoint was an early clinical response (ECR) at 48 to 72 h, defined as survival and ≥ 20% reduction in lesion size, without rescue antibacterial therapy. Results A total of 645 IV-start inpatients and 735 PO-start outpatients were assessed. Median age was 47 years for the IV-start group and 44 years for the PO-start group. Most patients had solely gram-positive infections (97% in each group; ECR [85.2% IV-start and 85.0% PO-start]), and the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) was similar between the groups. The most frequent AEs observed were nausea (11.2% [IV-start] versus 18.9% [PO-start]) and subcutaneous abscess (5.6% [IV-start] versus 1.9% [PO-start]). Discontinuation due to AEs was infrequent in both groups (2% [IV-start] versus 1.2% [PO-start]). Conclusion Oral therapy is equally efficacious to IV therapy when omadacycline or linezolid is used to treat ABSSSIs. These data strengthen the evidence for oral omadacycline as a therapeutic option for ABSSSI, particularly for patients who have experienced treatment failure because of the limitations of other therapies. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02378480 and NCT02877927.

Abstract Introduction The efficacy and safety of omadacycline have been primarily documented through Phase III clinical trials; however, there are limited data from real-world clinical settings. This study aims to explore the real-world use of omadacycline in China and identify the factors associated with its efficacy. Methods We conducted a retrospective review of medical records for patients treated with omadacycline at a single center from March 2022 to March 2024. We analyzed demographic characteristics, laboratory results, antibiotic regimens, and clinical outcomes. Logistic regression was employed to identify risk factors associated with clinical treatment failure or failure of microbial clearance. Results A total of 183 patients were included in the final analysis. Clinical success was achieved in 71.0% (130/183) of patients, with a bacterial clearance rate of 61.9% (26/42). Renal impairment was observed in 20.8% (38/183) of patients, with 39.5% (15/38) of these patients receiving nephrotoxic antibiotic treatments. Noteworthy adverse drug reactions were rare during the course of the treatment. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified several independent factors associated with treatment failure: moderate to severe liver damage (OR: 3.073, 95% CI 1.345–7.021, p = 0.008), admission to the respiratory department (OR: 2.573, 95% CI 1.135–5.834, p = 0.024), and a duration of omadacycline therapy of less than 7 days (OR: 3.762, 95% CI 1.626–8.706, p = 0.002). Conclusions Our study demonstrates that omadacycline treatment can achieve favorable clinical success and bacterial clearance, with positive safety and tolerability outcomes. However, high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to validate these initial findings.

Abstract Background Omadacycline is a new generation of tetracycline antibiotics, and its clinical application is increasing. We report the first case of acute pancreatitis possibly induced by omadacycline. Case presentation The patient was admitted to the emergency intensive care unit due to community-acquired pneumonia. The initial treatment consisted of meropenem combined with levofloxacin, and the regimen was subsequently switched to omadacycline combined with cefoperazone/sulbactam due to sputum culture showing carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Seven days after the administration of omadacycline, abdominal tenderness occurred, and CT scan revealed an enlarged gallbladder with exudation from the pancreatic head. The patient was diagnosed with acute pancreatitis and improved after dis-continuing omadacycline. Conclusions Omadacycline, like other tetracycline antibiotics, may cause pancreatitis. Combination medications can be an important factor in this adverse reaction.

Yan Chen,1 Jiahuan Tong,2 Jianfeng Wang2 1Department of General Practice, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Hangzhou, 310018, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Respiratory Diseases, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Hangzhou, 310018, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence: Jianfeng Wang, Department of Respiratory Diseases, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, 54 Youdian Road, Shangcheng District, Hangzhou, 310018, People’s Republic of China, Email 2001m@163.comAbstract: The clinical severity of Chlamydia psittaci infection ranges from asymptomatic to severe pneumonia. Diagnosis poses challenges due to its similarity to other respiratory infections. Treatment includes tetracyclines, macrolides, and fluoroquinolones, with limited evidence on the efficacy of omadacycline. We report a case of an 86-year-old male with severe psittacosis treated with omadacycline, resulting in significant improvement. This highlights the necessity for further research on omadacycline’s role in psittacosis treatment.Keywords: Chlamydia psittaci, omadacycline, pneumonia

Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates from the United States (n = 1038; 2019–2021) were susceptible to omadacycline (99.8%), levofloxacin (99.7%), and ceftriaxone (98.1%), whereas doxycycline (80.2%), oral penicillin (63.5%), cefpodoxime (76.8%), and azithromycin (54.4%) activity was limited. Tet (M) did not affect omadacycline activity but altered activity of older tetracyclines including doxycycline, suggesting omadacycline is an important option for treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Tetracyclines constitute a unique class of antibiotic agents, widely prescribed for both community and hospital infections due to their broad spectrum of activity. Acting by disrupting protein synthesis through tight binding to the 30S ribosomal subunit, their interference is typically reversible, rendering them bacteriostatic in action. Resistance to tetracyclines has primarily been associated with changes in pump efflux or ribosomal protection mechanisms. To address this challenge, tetracycline molecules have been chemically modified, resulting in the development of third-generation tetracyclines. These novel tetracyclines offer significant advantages in treating infections, whether used alone or in combination therapies, especially in hospital settings. Beyond their conventional antimicrobial properties, research has highlighted their potential non-antibiotic properties, including their impact on immunomodulation and malignancy. This review will focus on third-generation tetracyclines, namely tigecycline, eravacycline, and omadacycline. We will delve into their mechanisms of action and resistance, while also evaluating their pros and cons over time. Additionally, we will explore their therapeutic potential, analyzing their primary indications of prescription, potential future uses, and non-antibiotic features. This review aims to provide valuable insights into the clinical applications of third-generation tetracyclines, thereby enhancing understanding and guiding optimal clinical use. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Infections due to drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii strains are increasing and cause significant morbidity and mortality, especially in hospitalized and critically ill patients. A. baumannii rapidly develops resistance to numerous antibiotics, and antibiotics traditionally used against this deadly pathogen have been failing in recent years, highlighting the need to identify new treatment strategies. Treatment options that have shown promise include revisiting common antibiotics not typically used against A. baumannii, evaluating new antibiotics recently introduced to market, and identifying combinations of antibiotics that display synergistic interactions. In this study, we characterized the antibiotic susceptibility profiles of extensively (XDR) and pandrug-resistant (PDR) A. baumannii patient isolates. We examined the potency of 22 standard-of-care antibiotics and the newer antibiotics eravacycline, omadacycline, and plazomicin against these strains. Furthermore, we examined combinations of these antibiotics against our collection to identify synergistic effects. We found that this collection is highly resistant to most or all standard-of-care antibiotics, except for minocycline and rifampin. We show that eravacycline and omadacycline are effective against these strains based on minimum inhibitory concentrations. We also identified two highly effective combinations, cefepime and amikacin and cefepime and ampicillin–sulbactam, which exhibited high rates of synergy against this collection. This information is valuable in our battle against highly drug resistant and virtually untreatable A. baumannii infections. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Mycoplasma hominis, a commensal organism, is potentially pathogenic; its role in postoperative infections might be underestimated in cardiac surgery. Results: We reported two cases of postoperative M. hominis mediastinitis in immunocompetent patients with a DeBakey grade I aortic dissecting aneurysm and reviewed 10 other cases previously described. Among the 10 reviewed cases and our two cases, 11 patients were men (median age, 59 years; median onset of clinical symptoms time, 14.5 d after surgery; and mean peak of temperature, 38.5 ± 0.8 °C). In our reports, two patients underwent sternotomy site reopening and debridement before diagnosis was confirmed. Diagnosis was confirmed by prolonged culture and by performing metagenomic next-generation sequencing directly using the clinical samples. M. hominis was difficult to cover with initial empirical antibiotic therapy; the patient in this study showed complete improvement with long-term antimicrobial therapy. The targeted treatment duration for surviving patients among the reviewed cases ranged from three weeks to 16 months. Conclusions: The diagnosis of extragenital M. hominis infections is difficult. Therefore, the role of M. hominis as a cause of postoperative infections during cardiac surgery should be considered. Diagnosis requires molecular techniques to complement culture.

ABSTRACT Cystic fibrosis (CF) is characterized by chronic airway obstruction, infection, and inflammation leading to progressive loss of lung function and eventual respiratory failure. Omadacycline, a tetracycline antibiotic, demonstrates in vitro activity against key CF pathogens, substantial lung penetration, and increasing clinical evidence for the treatment of lung infections in people with CF (PwCF). Preliminary in vitro data demonstrate that omadacycline exhibits anti-inflammatory activity. This study aims to determine the anti-inflammatory effects of omadacycline in vitro and in a murine model of lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced lung neutrophilia. In vitro, THP-1-derived macrophages were treated with omadacycline (20–100 µg/mL) 30 minutes prior to LPS stimulation. Pro-inflammatory cytokine (TNF-α, IL-1β/6), chemokine (CXCL-1/2), and MMP-9 levels were analyzed after 24 hours by ELISA. Omadacycline’s effects on IL-8-induced human neutrophil chemotaxis were also investigated. In vivo, omadacycline (2.5–30 mg/kg), comparators dexamethasone (1 mg/kg), and azithromycin (30 mg/kg) were administered 1 hour before and 6 hours after intranasal LPS challenge, respectively. Leukocyte counts and differentials in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF), inflammatory mediator levels in BALF and lung homogenates, pulmonary edema markers, and the severity of lung injury were evaluated 24 hours or 48 hours post-challenge. Treatment with omadacycline in vitro resulted in significant, dose-dependent reductions in IL-6, CXCL-1, and MMP-9 expression and inhibition of IL-8-induced neutrophil chemotaxis. In vivo, omadacycline yielded protective and therapeutic effects by reducing the production of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines and neutrophil infiltration into the lungs, along with modestly improving lung injury severity. These preclinical results suggest that omadacycline may provide dual anti-bacterial and anti-inflammatory activities relevant to chronic lung infection treatment in PwCF.IMPORTANCENontuberculous mycobacteria, particularly Mycobacterium abscessus complex (MABSC), are a major concern for people with cystic fibrosis (PwCF) due to their association with deteriorating lung function. A substantial barrier to effective treatment is the limited number of safe and effective antibiotics. Omadacycline offers a potential advancement in managing MABSC infections in cystic fibrosis due to its activity, effective penetration into pulmonary secretions, improved tolerability, and good oral bioavailability as shown in healthy volunteers. Our study is the first to explore omadacycline’s effects in a model of sterile lung inflammation and acute lung injury. We found that omadacycline not only has potent anti-bacterial properties but also exhibits anti-inflammatory effects, reducing lung inflammation and injury in our preclinical models. These findings underscore omadacycline’s potential as a dual-action therapy for lung infections in PwCF, indicating significant potential to improve patient outcomes and guide more effective antimicrobial therapy decisions.

Biofilm-associated infections lead to substantial morbidity. Omadacycline (OMC) is a novel aminomethylcycline with potent in vitro activity against Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis, but data surrounding its use in biofilm-associated infections are lacking. We investigated the activity of OMC alone and in combination with rifampin (RIF) against 20 clinical strains of staphylococci in multiple in vitro biofilm analyses, including an in vitro pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) CDC biofilm reactor (CBR) model (simulating human exposures). The observed MICs for OMC demonstrated potent activity against the evaluated strains (0.125 to 1 mg/L), with an increase of MICs generally observed in the presence of biofilm (0.25 to >64 mg/L). Furthermore, RIF was shown to reduce OMC biofilm MICs (bMICs) in 90% of strains, and OMC plus RIF combination in biofilm time-kill analyses (TKAs) exhibited synergistic activity in most of the strains. Within the PK/PD CBR model, OMC monotherapy primarily displayed bacteriostatic activity, while RIF monotherapy generally exhibited initial bacterial eradication, followed by rapid regrowth likely due to the emergence of RIF resistance (RIF bMIC, >64 mg/L). However, the combination of OMC plus RIF produced rapid and sustained bactericidal activity in nearly all the strains (3.76 to 4.03 log10 CFU/cm2 reductions from starting inoculum in strains in which bactericidal activity was reached). Furthermore, OMC was shown to prevent the emergence of RIF resistance. Our data provide preliminary evidence that OMC in combination with RIF could be a viable option for biofilm-associated infections with S. aureus and S. epidermidis. Further research involving OMC in biofilm-associated infections is warranted.

Scrub typhus is one of the most underdiagnosed and unreported febrile illnesses caused by an obligate intracellular bacterium named Orientia tsutsugamushi and the antibiotics were the commonly prescribed drugs to treat the condition. Due to the widespread development of antimicrobial resistance to the standard drugs, the new therapeutic approach is warranted. The drug repurposing approach plays a novel concept in identifying alternative therapies to fight against pathogens. To investigate the anti-scrub typhus activity of nine newly FDA-approved antibiotics from 2018-2019 against Orientia tsutsugamushi deubiquitylase (OtDUB) compared with standard drugs. The structure of ligands was retrieved from the PubChem database and the crystal structure of target OtDUB (PDB ID: 6UPU) with a resolution of 2.2 Ao was retrieved from the Protein data bank. Molecular docking studies were performed using PyRx version 0.8 and the amino acid interactions were visualized using BIOVIA Discovery studio and the pharmacokinetic properties of the drugs were analysed by SWISS ADME software. The binding affinity of the drugs to deubiquitylase and amino acids was determined using the In silico approach, the drug Omadacycline shows superior activity when compared with other drugs. Based on our preliminary in-silico docking studies, we conclude that Omadacycline may be repurposed for the treatment of scrub typhus as it shows a higher binding affinity of -8.6 kcal/mol when compared to the standard drugs. For the further advancement of the study, in vitro and in vivo studies should be performed.

Introduction: Antibiotics frequently induce abnormal liver function. Omadacycline is a novel aminomethylcycline antibiotic, which shows potent activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative aerobic, anaerobic, and atypical (including Legionella pneumophila) bacteria. Of note, omadacycline is tolerable in most patients with liver impairment. However, evidence regarding the application of omadacycline in patients with Legionella pneumophila pneumonia after experiencing liver dysfunction is scarce. Methods: The current study reported 6 cases of patients with Legionella pneumophila pneumonia receiving omadacycline as subsequent antibiotics after experiencing liver dysfunction. Results: These 6 cases were admitted to the hospital for pneumonia and received antibiotic therapy, including piperacillin-tazobactam, imipenem, meropenem, and moxifloxacin. After receiving these antibiotics, increased liver enzymes were noted. Although hepatoprotective therapy (such as magnesium isoglycyrrhizinate and glutathione) was given, the liver function was still abnormal. According to metagenomic next-generation sequencing, these patients were diagnosed with Legionella pneumophila pneumonia. Considering the abnormal liver function, the antibiotic therapy was switched to omadacycline-containing antibiotic therapy. After that, liver function was improved, and the infection was ameliorated. Ultimately, all patients discharged from the hospital, including 2 patients who achieved complete clinical symptomatic improvement and 4 patients who achieved partial clinical symptomatic improvement. Discussion: This study emphasizes the successful treatment of switching to omadacycline after experiencing abnormal liver function in patients with Legionella pneumophila pneumonia. This study suggests that omadacycline may serve as an optional antibiotic for patients with Legionella pneumophila pneumonia, especially when occurring liver dysfunction. However, more clinical studies are required to validate our findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Scrub typhus is one of the most underdiagnosed and unreported febrile illnesses caused by an obligate intracellular bacterium named Orientia tsutsugamushi and the antibiotics were the commonly prescribed drugs to treat the condition. Due to the widespread development of antimicrobial resistance to the standard drugs, the new therapeutic approach is warranted. The drug repurposing approach plays a novel concept in identifying alternative therapies to fight against pathogens. To investigate the anti-scrub typhus activity of nine newly FDA-approved antibiotics from 2018-2019 against Orientia tsutsugamushi deubiquitylase (OtDUB) compared with standard drugs. The structure of ligands was retrieved from the PubChem database and the crystal structure of target OtDUB (PDB ID: 6UPU) with a resolution of 2.2 Ao was retrieved from the Protein data bank. Molecular docking studies were performed using PyRx version 0.8 and the amino acid interactions were visualized using BIOVIA Discovery studio and the pharmacokinetic properties of the drugs were analysed by SWISS ADME software. The binding affinity of the drugs to deubiquitylase and amino acids was determined using the In silico approach, the drug Omadacycline shows superior activity when compared with other drugs. Based on our preliminary in-silico docking studies, we conclude that Omadacycline may be repurposed for the treatment of scrub typhus as it shows a higher binding affinity of -8.6 kcal/mol when compared to the standard drugs. For the further advancement of the study, in vitro and in vivo studies should be performed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Legionella, one of the main pathogens that causes community-acquired pneumonia, can lead to Legionella pneumonia, a condition characterized predominantly by severe pneumonia. This disease, caused by the bacterium Legionella pneumophila, can quickly progress to critical pneumonia and is often associated with damage to multiple organs. As a result, it requires close attention in terms of clinical diagnosis and treatment. Omadacycline, a new type of tetracycline derivative belonging to the aminomethylcycline class of antibiotics, is a semi-synthetic compound derived from minocycline. Its key structural feature, the aminomethyl modification, allows omadacycline to overcome bacterial resistance and broadens its range of effectiveness against bacteria. Clinical studies have demonstrated that omadacycline is not metabolized in the body, and patients with hepatic and renal dysfunction do not need to adjust their dosage. This paper reports a case of successful treatment of Legionella pneumonia with omadacycline in a patient who initially did not respond to empirical treatment with moxifloxacin. The patient also experienced electrolyte disturbance, as well as dysfunction in the liver and kidneys, delirium, and other related psychiatric symptoms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction Combat-related wound infections complicate the recovery of wounded military personnel, contributing to overall morbidity and mortality. Wound infections in combat settings present unique challenges because of the size and depth of the wounds, the need to administer emergency care in the field, and the need for subsequent treatment in military facilities. Given the increase in multidrug-resistant pathogens, a novel, broad-spectrum antibiotic is desired across this continuum of care when the standard of care fails. Omadacycline was FDA-approved in 2018 for treatment of adults with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI), as well as community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP). It is a broad-spectrum antibiotic with activity against gram-positive, gram-negative, and atypical bacterial pathogens, including multidrug-resistant species. Omadacycline can overcome commonly reported tetracycline resistance mechanisms, ribosomal protection proteins, and efflux pumps, and is available in once-daily intravenous or oral formulations. In this review, we discuss the potential role of omadacycline, which is included in the Department of Defense Formulary, in the context of combat wound infections. Materials and Methods A literature review was undertaken for manuscripts published before July 21, 2023. This included a series of publications found via PubMed and a bibliography made publicly available on the Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Inc. website. Publications presenting primary data published in English on omadacycline in relation to ESKAPEE (Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli , and Enterobacter species) pathogens and Clostridioides difficile, including in vitro, in vivo , and clinical data were included. Results Of 260 identified records, 66 were included for evidence review. Omadacycline has in vitro activity against almost all the ESKAPEE pathogens, apart from P. aeruginosa. Importantly, it has activity against the four most prevalent bacterial pathogens that cause wound infections in the military healthcare system: S. aureus , including methicillin-resistant S. aureus, A. baumannii, K. pneumoniae , and E. coli. In vivo studies in rats have shown that omadacycline is rapidly distributed in most tissues, with the highest tissue-to-blood concentration ratios in bone mineral. The clinical efficacy of omadacycline has been assessed in three separate Phase 3 studies in patients with ABSSSI (OASIS-1 and OASIS-2) and with CABP (OPTIC). Overall, omadacycline has an established safety profile in the treatment of both ABSSSI and CABP. Conclusions Omadacycline has broad-spectrum activity, the option to be orally administered and an established safety profile, making it a potentially attractive replacement for moxifloxacin in the military individual first aid kit, especially when accounting for the increasing resistance to fluoroquinolones. Further studies and clinical evaluation are warranted to support broader use of omadacycline to treat combat wound infections in the military healthcare system. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ABSTRACT Omadacycline and eravacycline are gradually being used as new tetracycline antibiotics for the clinical treatment of Gram-negative pathogens. Affected by various tetracycline-inactivating enzymes, there have been reports of resistance to eravacycline and omadacycline in recent years. We isolated a strain carrying the mobile tigecycline resistance gene tet(X4) from the feces of a patient in Zhejiang Province, China. The strain belongs to the rare ST485 sequence type. The isolate was identified as Klebsiella pneumoniae by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS). The MICs of antimicrobial agents were determined using either the agar dilution method or the micro broth dilution method. The result showed that the isolate was resistant to eravacycline (MIC = 32 mg/L), omadacycline (MIC > 64 mg/L), and tigecycline (MIC > 32 mg/L). Whole-genome sequencing revealed that the tet(X4) resistance gene is located on the IncFII(pCRY) conjugative plasmid. tet(X4) is flanked by ISVsa3, and we hypothesize that this association contributes to the spread of the resistance gene. Plasmids were analyzed by S1-nuclease pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (S1-PFGE), Southern blotting, and electrotransformation experiment. We successfully transferred the plasmid carrying tet(X4) to the recipient bacteria by electrotransformation experiment. Compared with the DH-5α, the MICs of the transformant L3995-DH5α were increased by eight-fold for eravacycline and two-fold higher for omadacycline. Overall, the emergence of plasmid-borne tet(X4) resistance gene in a clinical isolate of K. pneumoniae ST485 underscores the essential requirement for the ongoing monitoring of tet(X4) to prevent and control its further dissemination in China.IMPORTANCEThere are still limited reports on Klebsiella pneumoniae strains harboring tetracycline-resistant genes in China, and K. pneumoniae L3995hy adds a new example to those positive for the tet(X4) gene. Importantly, our study raises concerns that plasmid-mediated resistance to omadacycline and eravacycline may spread further to a variety of ecological and clinical pathogens, limiting the choice of medication for extensively drug-resistant bacterial infections. Therefore, it is important to continue to monitor the prevalence and spread of tet(X4) and other tetracyclines resistance genes in K. pneumoniae and diverse bacterial populations.

ABSTRACT Treatment outcomes for Mycobacteroides abscessus (Mab, also known as Mycobacterium abscessus) disease are still unsatisfactory, mainly due to issues with drug toxicity, tolerability, and efficacy. Treating Mab disease is challenging due to its high baseline antibiotic resistance, initial requirement for intravenous therapy, and poor medication tolerance. Omadacycline, a new tetracycline, is active against Mab. Since any new antibiotic effective against Mab is expected to be used in combination with other antibiotics, we evaluated the efficacy of two triple-drug combinations comprising omadacycline, omadacycline + amikacin + imipenem, and omadacycline + clofazimine + linezolid against two contemporary Mab clinical isolates in a mouse model of Mab lung disease. Antibiotic administration was initiated 1-week post-infection and was given daily, with Mab burden in the lungs at treatment completion serving as the endpoint. Omadacycline alone moderately reduced Mab levels and maintained better health in mice compared to untreated ones, which typically suffered from the infection. The omadacycline + clofazimine + linezolid combination showed immediate bactericidal activity and enhanced efficacy over 6 weeks, particularly against the more resistant strain (M9507). However, the clofazimine + linezolid combination lacked early bactericidal activity. When combined with amikacin and imipenem, omadacycline did not improve the regimen’s effectiveness over 4 weeks of treatment. Our study showed that omadacycline + clofazimine + linezolid exhibited significant bactericidal activity over an extended treatment duration. However, adding omadacycline to amikacin and imipenem did not improve regimen effectiveness against the evaluated clinical isolates within 4 weeks. Further research in Mab disease patients is needed to determine the most effective omadacycline-containing regimen.IMPORTANCEMycobacteroides abscessus is a common environmental bacterium that causes infections in people with compromised lung function, including those with bronchiectasis, cystic fibrosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and weakened immune systems, especially among older individuals. Treating M. abscessus disease is challenging due to the limited effectiveness and toxicity of current antibiotics, which often require prolonged use. Omadacycline, a new antibiotic, shows promise against M. abscessus. Using a mouse model that mimics M. abscessus disease in humans, we studied the effectiveness of including omadacycline with recommended antibiotics. Adding omadacycline to clofazimine and linezolid significantly improved treatment outcomes, rapidly clearing the bacteria from the lungs and maintaining effectiveness throughout. This oral combination is convenient for patients. However, adding omadacycline to amikacin and imipenem did not improve treatment effectiveness within 4 weeks. Further study with M. abscessus patients is necessary to optimize omadacycline-based treatment strategies for this disease.

The crystal structure of the title compound {systematic name: (4S,4aS,5aR,12aR)-4,7-bis(dimethylamino)-9-[(2,2-dimethylpropylamino)methyl]-1,10,11,12a-tetrahydroxy-3,12-dioxo-4a,5,5a,6-tetrahydro-4H-tetracene-2-carboxamide dihydrate, C29H40N4O7·2H2O} has been solved and refined using synchrotron X-ray powder diffraction data: it crystallizes in space group R3 with a = 24.34430 (7), c = 14.55212 (4) Å, V = 7468.81 (2) Å3 and Z = 9. Most of the hydrogen bonds are intramolecular, but two classical N—H...O intermolecular hydrogen bonds (along with probable weak C—H...O and C—H...N hydrogen bonds) link the molecules into a three-dimensional framework. The framework contains voids, which contain disordered water molecules. Keto–enol tautomerism is apparently important in this molecule, and the exact molecular structure is ambiguous.

Abstract Objective In the present study, we aimed to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of omadacycline (OMC) with its comparators for the treatment of complicated skin and soft tissue infections (cSSTIs) in adult patients. Methods Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating OMC for cSSTIs were searched in databases of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Clinical Trial, up to July 2022. The primary outcomes were clinical efficacy and microbiological response, with secondary outcome was safety. Results Four RCTs consisting of 1,757 patients were included, with linezolid (LZD) as a comparator drug. For clinical efficacy, OMC was not inferior to LZD in the modified intent-to-treat (MITT) (OR: 1.24, 95% Cl: [0.93, 1.66], P = 0.15) and clinically evaluable (CE) populations (OR: 1.92, 95% Cl: [0.94, 3.92], P = 0.07). For microbiological response, OMC was numerically higher than LZD in the microbiologically evaluable (ME) (OR: 1.74, 95% Cl: [0.81, 3.74], P = 0.16) and microbiological MITT (micro-MITT) populations (OR: 1.27, 95% Cl: [0.92, 1.76], P = 0.14). No significant difference was found in subpopulations of monomicrobial or polymicrobial mixed infection populations. The mortality and adverse event rates were similar between OMC and LZD. Conclusions OMC was as good as LZD in terms of clinical efficacy and microbiological response, and has similar safety issues in treating cSSTIs. OMC might be a promising option for treating cSSTIs in adult patients.

Juan Wang, Shuangyong Dong, Mengjuan Fang, Zhiyan Fan, Yuansheng Xu Department of Emergency, Affiliated Hangzhou First People`s Hospital, School of Medicine, Westlake University, Hangzhou, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence: Yuansheng Xu, Department of Emergency, Affiliated Hangzhou First People`s Hospital, School of Medicine, Westlake University, No. 261 Huansha Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, 310006, People’s Republic of China, Email xys0912@163.comBackground: Chlamydia psittaci (C. psittaci) is a pathogen that is seldom implicated in community-acquired pneumonia and is rarely linked to severe pneumonia. Reports of severe C. psittaci pneumonia accompanied by Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS) are scarce. Tetracyclines are the preferred therapeutic approach for psittacosis. Omadacycline, a novel tetracycline, demonstrates strong antibacterial efficacy against typical bacteria and atypical pathogens, including C. psittaci. However, its application in the treatment of psittacosis pneumonia remains constrained.Case Presentation: A 77-year-old female patient was admitted to the hospital presenting with symptoms of fever, low back pain, and headache. The diagnosis of C. psittaci was established through the utilization of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS). Initial administration of moxifloxacin, meropenem, piperacillin-tazobactam, and doxycycline proved to be ineffective. Subsequent omadacycline leaded to the successful resolution of fever and dyspnea. However, after the endotracheal tube was removed, the patient experienced a rapid decline in symmetrical limb strength, leading to a diagnosis of GBS based on clinical manifestations, cerebrospinal fluid analysis, and electromyography. Following a 5-day course of immunoglobulin therapy and nutritional nerve treatment, the patient’s condition ameliorated, culminating in an uncomplicated discharge.Conclusion: This case provides evidence supporting the potential use of omadacycline as a therapeutic option for the treatment of severe C. psittaci pneumonia. The utilization of mNGS technology is of paramount importance in the prompt identification of uncommon pathogens, including C. psittaci. Nevertheless, the occurrence of GBS should be taken into consideration when C. psittaci pneumonia is accompanied by symmetrical limb weakness. These findings have important implications for the diagnosis, treatment, and management of patients with C. psittaci pneumonia.Keywords: Chlamydia psittaci pneumonia, Guillain-Barre syndrome, omadacycline, metagenomic next‑generation sequencing

Terbium- and nitrogen-doped carbon quantum dots (Tb,N@CQDs) were greenly created employing microwave synthesis from plum juice with terbium nitrate. The synthesis of Tb,N@CQDs was fast (7 min) with a high quantum yield (35.44%). Tb,N@CQDs were fully characterized using transmission electron microscopy, Zeta potential analysis, fluorescence, and ultraviolet spectroscopy. Omadacycline (OMC) is a broad-spectrum tetracycline that has been recently approved by the United States Food and Drug Act (FDA) in October 2018. OMC is the first oral aminomethylcycline class antibiotic drug that was authorized for the treatment of acute skin structure infections and community-acquired pneumonia. Tb,N@CQDs exhibited emission at 440 nm after excitation at 360 nm, where their fluorescence intensity showed a reduction upon addition of OMC. The experimental parameters were further studied and optimized. The linear range was between 40 and 60 parts per billion (ppb), with (limit of quantitation) equal to 34.78 ppb. The proposed approach was validated for bioanalytical purposes using FDA guidelines and proved to be straightforward, cheap, highly sensitive, and very selective, which can be used in clinical studies. The developed approach proved to be green using some current assessment metrics and was applied successfully for the determination of OMC in human plasma, milk, and pharmaceutical formulations as well as pharmacokinetic study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The crystal structure of the title compound {systematic name: (4S,4aS,5aR,12aR)-4,7-bis(dimethylamino)-9-[(2,2-dimethylpropylamino)meth-yl]-1,10,11,12a-tetrahydroxy-3,12-dioxo-4a,5,5a,6-tetrahydro-4#-tetracene-2-carboxamide dihydrate, C29H40N4O7⋅2H2O} has been solved and refined using synchrotron X-ray powder diffraction data: it crystallizes in space group R3 with α = 24.34430 (7), c = 14.55212 (4) Å, V = 7468.81 (2) ų and Z = 9. Most of the hydrogen bonds are intramolecular, but two classical N--H…O intermolecular hydrogen bonds (along with probable weak C--H…O and C--H…N hydrogen bonds) link the molecules into a three-dimensional framework. The framework contains voids, which contain disordered water molecules. Keto-enol tauto-merism is apparently important in this molecule, and the exact molecular structure is ambiguous. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Infections due to drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii strains are increasing and cause significant morbidity and mortality, especially in hospitalized and critically ill patients. A. baumannii rapidly develops resistance to numerous antibiotics, and antibiotics traditionally used against this deadly pathogen have been failing in recent years, highlighting the need to identify new treatment strategies. Treatment options that have shown promise include revisiting common antibiotics not typically used against A. baumannii, evaluating new antibiotics recently introduced to market, and identifying combinations of antibiotics that display synergistic interactions. In this study, we characterized the antibiotic susceptibility profiles of extensively (XDR) and pandrug-resistant (PDR) A. baumannii patient isolates. We examined the potency of 22 standard-of-care antibiotics and the newer antibiotics eravacycline, omadacycline, and plazomicin against these strains. Furthermore, we examined combinations of these antibiotics against our collection to identify synergistic effects. We found that this collection is highly resistant to most or all standard-of-care antibiotics, except for minocycline and rifampin. We show that eravacycline and omadacycline are effective against these strains based on minimum inhibitory concentrations. We also identified two highly effective combinations, cefepime and amikacin and cefepime and ampicillin–sulbactam, which exhibited high rates of synergy against this collection. This information is valuable in our battle against highly drug resistant and virtually untreatable A. baumannii infections.

IntroductionApproximately 3% of hospitalized patients with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) develop healthcare-associated Clostridioides difficile infection (HCA-CDI). The validated Davis risk score (DRS) indicates that patients with a DRS ≥ 6 are at an increased risk of 30-day HCA-CDI. In the phase 3 OPTIC CABP study, 14% of CABP patients with DRS ≥ 6 who received moxifloxacin developed CDI vs. 0% for omadacycline. This study assessed the potential economic impact of substituting current guideline-concordant CABP inpatient treatments with omadacycline in hospitalized CABP patients with a DRS ≥ 6 across US hospitals.MethodsA deterministic healthcare-decision analytic model was developed. The model population was hospitalized adult CABP patients with a DRS ≥ 6 across US hospitals (100,000 patients). In the guideline-concordant arm, 14% of CABP patients with DRS ≥ 6 were assumed to develop an HCA-CDI, each costing USD 20,100. In the omadacycline arm, 5 days of therapy was calculated for the entire model population.ResultsThe use of omadacycline in place of guideline-concordant CABP inpatient treatments for CABP patients with DRS ≥ 6 was estimated to result in cost savings of USD 55.4 million annually across US hospitals.ConclusionThe findings of this simulated model suggest that prioritizing the use of omadacycline over current CABP treatments in hospitalized CABP with a DRS ≥ 6 may potentially reduce attributable HCA-CDI costs. The findings are not unique to omadacycline and could be applied to any antibiotic that confers a lower risk of HCA-CDI relative to current CABP inpatient treatments.

IntroductionChlamydia psittaci infection in humans is a rare cause that mainly present as community-acquired pneumonia. Severe Chlamydia psittaci pneumonia can lead to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), septic shock, or multiple organ dysfunction with a mortality rate of 15%–20% before accurate diagnosis and targeted treatment. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) has an advantage in achieving early diagnosis. In the study, omadacycline implementation was described to provide a better understanding of effectiveness in severe psittacosis pneumonia with ARDS.MethodsSixteen patients with severe psittacosis pneumonia with ARDS were selected between September 2021 and October 2022. They were diagnosed using mNGS and treated with omadacycline. Retrospective analysis of clinical manifestations, laboratory data, disease progression, diagnostic tool, treatment, and prognosis was summarized.ResultsCommon symptoms included fever, dyspnea, and cough. All patients developed ARDS, accompanied by septic shock (43.7%) and pulmonary embolism (43.7%). Laboratory data showed normal leucocytes, increased creatine kinase isoenzyme, and decreased albumin with liver dysfunction in most patients. All patients had increased neutrophils, C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, and D-dimer with decreased lymphocytes. Airspace consolidation, ground glass opacity, and pleural effusion were found on chest CT. mNGS results were obtained in 24–48 h to identify the diagnosis of Chlamydia psittacosis. All patients received mechanical ventilation with omadacycline treatment. Fourteen patients experienced complete recovery, while the other two patients died from multidrug-resistant bacterial infection and renal failure.ConclusionmNGS has a significant value in the diagnosis of Chlamydia psittaci infection. Timely treatment of omadacycline can improve prognosis and provide a promising new option for the treatment of severe Chlamydia psittaci pneumonia with ARDS.

Background: Antimicrobial resistance and therapy‐related adverse effects make Mycobacterium abscessus treatment challenging. Omadacycline is a novel, bioavailable aminomethylcycline with favourable in vitro activity against M. abscessus. Aims: To describe a case report and review the published literature describing outcomes for M. abscessus infections treated with omadacycline. Methods: Systematic literature review. Results: We identified three articles that, in addition to our case report, describe 18 patients. Pulmonary infections were most frequent. Minimum inhibitory concentrations were reported for two isolates (0.25 and 0.5 mg/L). Despite half the patients starting omadacycline because of failure of prior therapy, 15 (83%) had a favourable outcome, defined as 'cure', 'improvement' or 'clinical success' as determined by the primary study authors. One patient (6%) discontinued omadacycline because of gastrointestinal intolerance. Conclusions: Although the limited observational data and in vitro susceptibility results are encouraging, randomised control trials are required to determine the role of omadacycline as part of combination therapy for this most difficult‐to‐treat pathogen. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Omadacycline is a novel tetracycline antibiotic that exhibits good in vitro antibacterial activity against atypical pathogens such as Mycoplasma pneumoniae. It is approved for the treatment of adults with communityacquired bacterial pneumonia. However, the safety and efficacy of omadacycline in pediatric patients under 18 years of age have not yet been established. In the present paper, we report a case of pediatric communityacquired pneumonia in which initial empirical anti-infective therapy had failed. The patient received empirical anti-infective therapy with azithromycin and other antimicrobial agents upon admission but showed a poor clinical response and developed secondary tinnitus and liver dysfunction. After the confirmation of M. pneumoniae infection through metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, an antibiotic switch to omadacycline was made. Thereafter, the patient's condition improved, and no adverse reactions were observed. These findings demonstrate that mNGS enables the identification of infection-causing pathogens in patients with unresponsive pneumonia. Omadacycline can be considered as an alternative option for antiinfective therapy in pediatric M. pneumoniae pneumonia, especially when the presence of bacterial resistance, adverse drug reactions, or organ failure are taken into consideration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Objective This study aims to assess the clinical efficacy and safety of omadacycline for the treatment of acute bacterial infections. Methods A search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Clinical Trials was conducted up to July 1, 2022. We included only randomized controlled trials (RCTs), in which omadacycline and other antibiotics were evaluated for treating acute bacterial infections in adults. The primary outcomes were clinical response and microbiological response, whereas the secondary outcome was the risk of adverse events (AEs). Results A total of seven RCTs involving 2841 patients with acute bacterial infection were included. Overall, our study illustrated that the clinical cure ratio of omadacycline was similar to the comparators in the treatment of acute bacterial infections (OR = 1.18, 95%CI = 0.96, 1.46, I2 = 29%). Omadacycline had a microbiological eradication rate similar to comparators in the treatment of acute bacterial infections (OR = 1.02, 95%CI = 0.81, 1.29, I2 = 42%). No statistical differences were observed between omadacycline and the comparators in terms of infection caused by Staphylococcus aureus (OR = 1.14, 95%CI = 0.80, 1.63, I2 = 0%), methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA, OR = 1.28, 95%CI = 0.73, 2.24, I2 = 0%), methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA, OR = 1.12, 95%CI = 0.69, 1.81, I2 = 0%), and Enterococcus faecalis (OR = 2.47, 95%CI = 0.36, 16.97, I2 = 7%). A significant difference was found between omadacycline and the comparators for the risk of any AEs and treatment related AEs. The risk of discontinuation of the study drug due to an AEs was lower for omadacycline than for the comparators. Conclusion Omadacycline is as good as comparators in terms of efficacy and tolerance in the treatment of acute bacterial infections in adult patients. Thus, omadacycline is an appropriate option for antibiotic therapy in adult patients with acute bacterial infections.

Tetracyclines constitute a unique class of antibiotic agents, widely prescribed for both community and hospital infections due to their broad spectrum of activity. Acting by disrupting protein synthesis through tight binding to the 30S ribosomal subunit, their interference is typically reversible, rendering them bacteriostatic in action. Resistance to tetracyclines has primarily been associated with changes in pump efflux or ribosomal protection mechanisms. To address this challenge, tetracycline molecules have been chemically modified, resulting in the development of third-generation tetracyclines. These novel tetracyclines offer significant advantages in treating infections, whether used alone or in combination therapies, especially in hospital settings. Beyond their conventional antimicrobial properties, research has highlighted their potential non-antibiotic properties, including their impact on immunomodulation and malignancy. This review will focus on third-generation tetracyclines, namely tigecycline, eravacycline, and omadacycline. We will delve into their mechanisms of action and resistance, while also evaluating their pros and cons over time. Additionally, we will explore their therapeutic potential, analyzing their primary indications of prescription, potential future uses, and non-antibiotic features. This review aims to provide valuable insights into the clinical applications of third-generation tetracyclines, thereby enhancing understanding and guiding optimal clinical use.

Antibiotic resistance is a public health problem with increasingly alarming data being reported. Gram-positive bacteria are among the protagonists of severe nosocomial and community infections. The objective of this review is to conduct an extensive examination of emerging treatments for Gram-positive infections including ceftobiprole, ceftaroline, dalbavancin, oritavancin, omadacycline, tedizolid, and delafloxacin. From a methodological standpoint, a comprehensive analysis on clinical trials, molecular structure, mechanism of action, microbiological targeting, clinical use, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic features, and potential for therapeutic drug monitoring will be addressed. Each antibiotic paragraph is divided into specialized microbiological, clinical, and pharmacological sections, including detailed and appropriate tables. A better understanding of the latest promising advances in the field of therapeutic options could lead to the development of a better approach in managing antimicrobial therapy for multidrug-resistant Gram-positive pathogens, which increasingly needs to be better stratified and targeted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of China Tropical Medicine is the property of China Tropical Medicine Editorial Office and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is an opportunistic pathogen and frequent cause of serious nosocomial infections. Patient populations at greatest risk for these infections include the immunocompromised and those with chronic respiratory illnesses and prior antibiotic exposure, notably to carbapenems. Its complex virulence and resistance profile drastically limit available antibiotics, and incomplete breakpoint and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) data to inform dose optimization further complicates therapeutic approaches. Clinical comparison data of first‐line agents, including trimethoprim‐sulfamethoxazole (TMP‐SMX), quinolones, and minocycline, are limited to conflicting observational data with no clear benefit of a single agent or combination therapy. Newer antibiotic approaches, including cefiderocol and aztreonam‐ avibactam, are promising alternatives for extensively drug‐resistant isolates; however, clinical outcomes data are needed. The potential clinical utility of bacteriophage for compassionate use in treating S. maltophilia infections remains to be determined since data is limited to in‐vitro and sparse in‐vivo work. This article provides a review of available literature for S. maltophilia infection management focused on related epidemiology, resistance mechanisms, identification, susceptibility testing, antimicrobial PK/PD, and emerging therapeutic strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Non‐tuberculous mycobacterial infections are gradually increasing worldwide, with slow‐growing mycobacteria such as Mycobacterium avium, Mycobacterium intracellulare and Mycobacterium kansasii accounting for the majority of cases. The use of tetracyclines has received renewed attention in recent years, and this study was designed to investigate the antibacterial activity of omadacycline, eravacycline, tigecycline, sarecycline, minocycline and doxycycline against M. avium, M. intracellulare and M. kansasii. Susceptibility testing of six tetracyclines was conducted against M. avium, M. intracellulare and M. kansasii isolates, and all the clinical isolates were collected from January 2012 to December 2018. All six agents exhibited poor antibacterial activity against slowly growing mycobacteria (SGM) isolates of three subspecies with MIC50 and MIC90 ≥8 μg/mL. M. intracellulare and M. kansasii had lower resistance rates to omadacycline than the other five drugs. The severe resistance of SGM to tetracycline suggests that developing tetracycline‐class antibiotics needs to overcome existing resistance mechanisms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The progressive increase in antibiotic resistance in recent decades calls for urgent development of new antibiotics and antibiotic stewardship programs to help select appropriate treatments with the goal of minimising further emergence of resistance and to optimise clinical outcomes. Three new tetracycline-class antibiotics, eravacycline, omadacycline, and tigecycline, have been approved within the past 15 years, and represent a new era in the use of tetracyclines. These drugs overcome the two main mechanisms of acquired tetracycline-class resistance and exhibit a broad spectrum of in vitro activity against gram-positive, gram-negative, anaerobic, and atypical pathogens, including many drug-resistant strains. We provide an overview of the three generations of tetracycline-class drugs, focussing on the efficacy, safety, and clinical utility of these three new third-generation tetracycline-class drugs. We also consider various scenarios of unmet clinical needs where patients might benefit from re-engagement with tetracycline-class antibiotics including outpatient treatment options, patients with known β-lactam antibiotic allergy, reducing the risk of Clostridioides difficile infection, and their potential as monotherapy in polymicrobial infections while minimising the risk of any potential drug-drug interaction. KEY MESSAGESThe long-standing safety profile and broad spectrum of activity of tetracycline-class antibiotics made them a popular choice for treatment of various bacterial infections; unfortunately, antimicrobial resistance has limited the utility of the early-generation tetracycline agents.The latest generation of tetracycline-class antibiotics, including eravacycline, tigecycline, and omadacycline, overcomes the most common acquired tetracycline resistance mechanisms.Based on in vitro characteristics and clinical data, these newer tetracycline agents provide an effective antibiotic option in the treatment of approved indications in patients with unmet clinical needs – including patients with severe penicillin allergy, with renal or hepatic insufficiency, recent Clostridioides difficile infection, or polymicrobial infections, and those at risk of drug–drug interactions.

Abstract The Mycobacterium abscessus complex (MABC) is a group of acid-fast, rapidly dividing non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) that include a number of clinically important subspecies, including M. abscessus, M. bolletii, and M. massiliense. These organisms are prevalent in the environment and are primarily associated with human pulmonary or skin and skin structure infections (SSSI) but may cause more deep-seeded disseminated infections and bacteremia in the immunocompromised. Importantly, these NTM are resistant to most first-line anti-tuberculous agents and, due to intrinsic or acquired resistance, exhibit exceedingly low, variable, and geographically distinct susceptibilities to commonly used antibacterial agents including older tetracyclines, macrolides, aminoglycosides, cephalosporins, carbapenems, and sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim. Omadacycline is a novel third-generation member of the tetracycline family of antibacterials that has recently been demonstrated to have potent anti-NTM effects and clinical efficacy against MABC, including M. abscessus. The purpose of this review is to present a comprehensive and up-to-date assessment on the body of literature on the role of omadacycline for M. abscessus infections. Specifically, the in vitro and in vivo microbiology, mechanisms of action, mechanisms of resistance, clinical pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, adverse effects, dosage and administration, and place in therapy of omadacycline in management of M. abscessus infections will be detailed.

Background/purpose: This study aimed to investigate the in vitro susceptibilities of carbapenem-non-susceptible Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CNSPA) and Acinetobacter baumannii (CNSAB) isolates to cefiderocol, novel β-lactamase inhibitor (BLI) combinations, new tetracycline analogues, and other comparative antibiotics. Methods: In total, 405 non-duplicate bacteremic CNSPA (n = 150) and CNSAB (n = 255) isolates were collected from 16 hospitals in Taiwan between 2018 and 2020. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined using the broth microdilution method, and susceptibilities were interpreted according to the relevant guidelines or in accordance with results of previous studies and non-species-related pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic data. Results: Among the isolates tested, cefiderocol demonstrated potent in vitro activity against CNSPA (MIC50/90, 0.25/1 mg/L; 100% of isolates were inhibited at ≤4 mg/L) and CNSAB (MIC50/90, 0.5/2 mg/L; 94.9% of isolates were inhibited at ≤4 mg/L) isolates. More than 80% of CNSPA isolates were susceptible to cefiderocol, ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam, and amikacin, based on breakpoints established by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Activities of new BLI combinations varied significantly. Tetracycline analogues, including tigecycline (MIC50/90, 1/2 mg/L; 92.5% of CNSAB isolates were inhibited at ≤2 mg/L) and eravacycline (MIC50/90, 0.5/1 mg/L; 99.6% of CNSAB isolates were inhibited at ≤2 mg/L) exhibited more potent in vitro activity against CNSAB than omadacycline (MIC50/90, 4/8 mg/L). Conclusions: The spread of CNSPA and CNSAB poses a major challenge to global health. Significant resistance be developed even before a novel agent becomes commercially available. The development of on-site antimicrobial susceptibility tests for these novel agents is of great clinical importance.

Changquan Fang,1,&ast; Limin Xu,2,&ast; Jiarong Tan,1 Hongyi Tan,1 Junhong Lin,1 Ziwen Zhao3 1Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Huizhou Central People’s Hospital, Huizhou, Guangdong Province, Peoples’ Republic of China; 2Department of Geriatrics, Huizhou First People’s Hospital, Huizhou, Guangdong Province, Peoples’ Republic of China; 3Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Guangzhou First People’s Hospital Affiliated to South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, Peoples’ Republic of China&ast;These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Junhong Lin, Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Huizhou Central People’s Hospital, No. 41 Eling North Road, Huicheng District, Huizhou City, Guangdong Province, 516000, Peoples’ Republic of China, Tel +86 130-7528-2839, Email hz_ljh@163.com Ziwen Zhao, Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Guangzhou First People’s Hospital Affiliated to South China University of Technology, No. 1 Panfu Road, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province, 510180, Peoples’ Republic of China, Tel +86 130-0687-2260, Email zhaozw@yeah.netAbstract: Psittacosis is a rare zoonotic disease caused by Chlamydia psittaci infection, and tetracyclines are the preferred treatment. Omadacycline is a novel tetracycline that has a strong in vitro antibacterial activity against atypical pathogens, including C. psittaci; however, clinical data for its usage are lacking. We report a patient with severe C. psittaci-induced pneumonia presenting with a high fever, muscle aches, severe hepatic and renal insufficiency, and acute respiratory failure requiring tracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation. The condition was diagnosed using metagenomic next-generation sequencing. The patient was discharged after treatment with omadacycline. The findings of this study suggest that metagenomic next-generation sequencing is valuable for the rapid and accurate diagnosis of psittacosis. With its good safety profile and no requirement for dose adjustment in special populations, omadacycline is a new option for the treatment of severe C. psittaci pneumonia. However, additional case reports are needed to support this conclusion.Keywords: Chlamydia psittaci, pneumonia, omadacycline, multiple organ failure, metagenomic next-generation sequencing

Limited oral antibiotic options exist for urinary tract infections (UTI) caused by ESBL-producing Enterobacterales. The aim of the study was to evaluate in vitro activity of omadacycline and comparator antibiotics against clinical ESBL-producing and non-ESBL-producing E. coli and K. pneumoniae urinary isolates. 102 isolates each of E. coli and K. pneumoniae were collected from clinical urine specimens in 2019. By design, an equal number of each species were included that tested positive and negative for ESBL production. Omadacycline MICs were determined using gradient test strips and compared to MICs of comparator antibiotics as determined by an automated broth microdilution system. Isolates were considered susceptible to omadacycline if the MIC was ≤4 µg/mL for each species. 54.9% of all ESBL-producing isolates were susceptible to omadacycline, but better susceptibility was observed for ESBL-producing E. coli (74.5%). Omadacycline MICs were 2–4 fold lower for E. coli and K. pneumoniae strains not producing ESBL. The omadacycline MIC 50 and 90 values were 4 and 16 µg/mL, respectively, for all isolates studied. 74.5% of all isolates were considered susceptible to omadacycline. MICs were generally lower for E. coli strains with MIC 50 and 90 values of 4 and 8 µg/mL, respectively (87.3% susceptible), compared with K. pneumoniae. Overall, the most active agents were omadacycline and nitrofurantoin, while other comparator antibiotics were less active. Omadacycline represents a promising oral antibiotic for treating UTI caused by ESBL-producing E. coli, particularly when resistance limits other oral options. Prospective, controlled clinical trials are needed to validate these in vitro results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: This study aims to assess the clinical efficacy and safety of omadacycline for the treatment of acute bacterial infections. Methods: A search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Clinical Trials was conducted up to July 1, 2022. We included only randomized controlled trials (RCTs), in which omadacycline and other antibiotics were evaluated for treating acute bacterial infections in adults. The primary outcomes were clinical response and microbiological response, whereas the secondary outcome was the risk of adverse events (AEs). Results: A total of seven RCTs involving 2841 patients with acute bacterial infection were included. Overall, our study illustrated that the clinical cure ratio of omadacycline was similar to the comparators in the treatment of acute bacterial infections (OR = 1.18, 95%CI = 0.96, 1.46, I2 = 29%). Omadacycline had a microbiological eradication rate similar to comparators in the treatment of acute bacterial infections (OR = 1.02, 95%CI = 0.81, 1.29, I2 = 42%). No statistical differences were observed between omadacycline and the comparators in terms of infection caused by Staphylococcus aureus (OR = 1.14, 95%CI = 0.80, 1.63, I2 = 0%), methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA, OR = 1.28, 95%CI = 0.73, 2.24, I2 = 0%), methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA, OR = 1.12, 95%CI = 0.69, 1.81, I2 = 0%), and Enterococcus faecalis (OR = 2.47, 95%CI = 0.36, 16.97, I2 = 7%). A significant difference was found between omadacycline and the comparators for the risk of any AEs and treatment related AEs. The risk of discontinuation of the study drug due to an AEs was lower for omadacycline than for the comparators. Conclusion: Omadacycline is as good as comparators in terms of efficacy and tolerance in the treatment of acute bacterial infections in adult patients. Thus, omadacycline is an appropriate option for antibiotic therapy in adult patients with acute bacterial infections. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]