Search

• Laser-paired associative stimulation elicits abnormal primary motor cortex (M1) plasticity in patients with chronic pain. • In chronic pain, impaired M1 plasticity reflects abnormal pain-motor integration. • Abnormal pain-motor integration plays a prominent role in the pathophysiology of chronic pain. Chronic pain may lead to functional changes in several brain regions, including the primary motor cortex (M1). Our neurophysiological study aimed to probe M1 plasticity, through a non-invasive transcranial magnetic stimulation protocol, in a cohort of patients with chronic pain. Twenty patients with chronic pain (age ± SD: 62.9 ± 9.9) and 20 age- and sex-matched healthy controls (age ± SD: 59.6 ± 15.8) were recruited. Standardized scales were used for the evaluation of pain severity. Neurophysiological measures included laser-evoked potentials (LEPs) and motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) collected at baseline and over 60 minutes following a standardized Laser-paired associative stimulation (Laser-PAS) protocol. LEPs and MEPs were comparable in patients with chronic pain and controls. The pain threshold was lower in patients than in controls. Laser-PAS elicited decreased responses in patients with chronic pain. The response to Laser-PAS was similar in subgroups of patients with different chronic pain phenotypes. M1 plasticity, as tested by Laser-PAS, is altered in patients with chronic pain, possibly reflecting abnormal pain-motor integration processes. Chronic pain is associated with a disorder of M1 plasticity raising from abnormal pain-motor integration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background In Parkinson's disease (PD), the influence of chronic pain on motor features has never been investigated. We have recently designed a technique that combines nociceptive system activation by laser stimuli and primary motor cortex (M1) activation through transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), in a laser-paired associative stimulation design (Laser-PAS). In controls, Laser-PAS induces long-term changes in motor evoked potentials reflecting M1 long-term potentiation-like plasticity, arising from pain-motor integration. Objective We here examined the possible influence of chronic pain on motor responses to Laser-PAS in patients with PD, with and without chronic pain. Methods We compared motor responses to Laser-PAS in healthy subjects and in patients with PD, with and without chronic pain. Results Unlike controls, we found reduced responses to Laser-PAS in patients with PD, with and without pain. Patients off and on dopaminergic therapy had similar responses to Laser-PAS. When comparing responses to Laser-PAS in patients with and without pain, the two patients' subgroups had similar abnormalities. When we compared patients with pain in the body region investigated with Laser-PAS, with those with pain in other body regions, we found prominent changes in patients with homotopic pain. Finally, when comparing Laser-PAS with the original PAS protocol, which combines electric peripheral nerve stimuli and TMS, in patients without pain and those with homotopic pain, we found similar responses to both techniques in patients without pain, whereas Laser-PAS induced greater abnormalities than PAS in patients with pain. Conclusions In PD, chronic pain degrades response to Laser-PAS through abnormal pain-motor integration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background The distinctive feature of unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS) is the dissociation between arousal and awareness. Cortico-cortical and thalamo-cortical connectivity and plasticity play a key role in consciousness. UWS patients do not usually show any “cortical” behavioral sign in response to painful stimulation. Nevertheless a “focal conscious” pain perception has been hypothesized. Hypothesis Since defective plasticity and connectivity within pain matrix could be striking mechanisms of non-conscious pain perception and, consequently, of non-cortical responses in UWS subjects, aim of our study was to investigate pain-motor plasticity in such patients through a specific paired laser associative stimulation protocol (L-PAS). Methods We enrolled 10 post-anoxic subjects and 10 healthy controls evaluating clinical and electrophysiological parameters before and after the application of such protocol. Results Some patient showed a restored pain-motor integration with a partial motor cortex excitability modification. Conclusions Although we studied a small cohort of post-anoxic UWS patients and the results obtained were short-lasting, L-PAS seems a feasible and suitable technique in order to induce plastic change within pain matrix in some UWS patients, allowing the production of “cortical” responses to painful stimuli, which are signs of at least partially (“focal”) preserved consciousness. Cortico-thalamic plasticity could have also an important role in the emergence of pain perception as compared to other sensory modalities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]