Search

Standard posterior cervical fusion is a common surgical technique that utilizes lateral mass screws and rods for fixation. A relatively new, minimally invasive technique involving interfacet decortication and placement of spacers has shown promise in terms of outcomes. We sought to determine fusion rates and complications of this new technique at our institution to bolster current literature. We retrospectively reviewed all patients that underwent a 3-level or less minimally invasive posterior cervical fusions by a single surgeon. Patients were evaluated to determine fusion rates and postoperative complications. Twenty-eight patients underwent minimally invasive posterior cervical fusion. Twenty-seven demonstrated fusion (96%). One patient that underwent the procedure for juxta-fusional disease required additional surgery for pseudoarthrosis. The minimally invasive posterior cervical technique results in favorable fusion rates and has low complication rates. Our study strengthens current literature that this minimally invasive technique is a safe and effective alternative. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective We propose that cervical intrafacetal fusion (cIFF) using bone chip insertion into the facetal joint space additional to minimal PLF is a supplementary fusion method to conventional posterolateral fusion (PLF). Methods Patients who underwent posterior cervical fixation accompanied by cIFF with minimal PLF or conventional PLF for cervical myelopathy from 2012 to 2023 were investigated retrospectively. Radiological parameters including Cobb angle and C2–7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA) were compared between the 2 groups. In cIFF with minimal PLF group, cIFF location and PLF location were carefully divided, and the fusion rates of each location were analyzed by computed tomography scan. Results Among enrolled 46 patients, 31 patients were in cIFF group, 15 in PLF group. The postoperative change of Cobb angle in 1-year follow-up in cIFF with minimal PLF group and conventional PLF group were 0.1° ± 4.0° and -9.7° ± 8.4° respectively which was statistically lower in cIFF with minimal PLF group (p = 0.022). Regarding the fusion rate in cIFF with minimal PLF group in postoperative 6 months, the rates was achieved in 267 facets (98.1%) in cIFF location, and 244 facets (89.7%) in PLF location (p < 0.001). Conclusion Postoperative sagittal alignment was more preserved in cIFF with minimal PLF group compared with conventional PLF group. Additionally, in cIFF with minimal PLF group, the bone fusion rate of cIFF location was higher than PLF location. Considering the concerns of bone chip migration onto the spinal cord and relatively low fusion rate in PLF method, applying cIFF method using minimized PLF might be a beneficial alternative for posterior cervical decompression and fixation.

Objective Readmission rates after posterior cervical fusion (PCF) significantly impact patients and healthcare, with complication rates at 15%–25% and up to 12% 90-day readmission rates. In this study, we aim to test whether machine learning (ML) models that capture interfactorial interactions outperform traditional logistic regression (LR) in identifying readmission-associated factors. Methods The Optum Clinformatics Data Mart database was used to identify patients who underwent PCF between 2004–2017. To determine factors associated with 30-day readmissions, 5 ML models were generated and evaluated, including a multivariate LR (MLR) model. Then, the best-performing model, Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM), was compared to the LACE (Length patient stay in the hospital, Acuity of admission of patient in the hospital, Comorbidity, and Emergency visit) index regarding potential cost savings from algorithm implementation. Results This study included 4,130 patients, 874 of which were readmitted within 30 days. When analyzed and scaled, we found that patient discharge status, comorbidities, and number of procedure codes were factors that influenced MLR, while patient discharge status, billed admission charge, and length of stay influenced the GBM model. The GBM model significantly outperformed MLR in predicting unplanned readmissions (mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.846 vs. 0.829; p < 0.001), while also projecting an average cost savings of 50% more than the LACE index. Conclusion Five models (GBM, XGBoost [extreme gradient boosting], RF [random forest], LASSO [least absolute shrinkage and selection operator], and MLR) were evaluated, among which, the GBM model exhibited superior predictive performance, robustness, and accuracy. Factors associated with readmissions impact LR and GBM models differently, suggesting that these models can be used complementarily. When analyzing PCF procedures, the GBM model resulted in greater predictive performance and was associated with higher theoretical cost savings for readmissions associated with PCF complications.

Purpose: To determine if C2 pedicle versus pars screw type predicts change in fusion status, C2 screw loosening, cervical alignment, and patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) after C2–T2 posterior cervical decompression and fusion (PDCF). Methods: All adult patients who underwent C2–T2 PCDF for myelopathy or myeloradiculopathy between 2013–2020 were retrospectively identified. Patients were dichotomized by C2 screw type into bilateral C2 pedicle and bilateral C2 pars screw groups. Preoperative and short- and long-term postoperative radiographic outcomes and PROMs were collected. Univariate and multivariate analysis compared patient factors, fusion status, radiographic measures, and PROMs across groups. Results: A total of 159 patients met the inclusion/exclusion criteria (76 bilateral pedicle screws, 83 bilateral pars screws). Patients in the C2 pars relative to C2 pedicle screw group were on average more likely to have bone morphogenic protein (p = 0.001) and four-millimeter diameter rods utilized intraoperatively (p = 0.033). There were no significant differences in total construct and C2-3 fusion rate, C2 screw loosening, or complication and revision rates between C2 screw groups in univariate and regression analysis. Changes in C2 tilt, C2–3 segmental lordosis, C0–2 Cobb angle, proximal junctional kyphosis, atlanto-dens interval, C1 lamina-occiput distance, C2 sagittal vertical axis, C2–7 lordosis, and PROMs at all follow-up intervals did not vary significantly by C2 screw type. Conclusion: There were no significant differences in fusion status, hardware complications, and radiographic and clinical outcomes based on C2 screw type following C2–T2 PCDF. Accordingly, intraoperative usage criteria can be flexible based on patient vertebral artery positioning and surgeon comfort level. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Readmission rates after posterior cervical fusion (PCF) significantly impact patients and healthcare, with complication rates at 15%–25% and up to 12% 90-day readmission rates. In this study, we aim to test whether machine learning (ML) models that capture interfactorial interactions outperform traditional logistic regression (LR) in identifying readmission-associated factors. Methods: The Optum Clinformatics Data Mart database was used to identify patients who underwent PCF between 2004–2017. To determine factors associated with 30-day readmissions, 5 ML models were generated and evaluated, including a multivariate LR (MLR) model. Then, the best-performing model, Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM), was compared to the LACE (Length patient stay in the hospital, Acuity of admission of patient in the hospital, Comorbidity, and Emergency visit) index regarding potential cost savings from algorithm implementation. Results: This study included 4,130 patients, 874 of which were readmitted within 30 days. When analyzed and scaled, we found that patient discharge status, comorbidities, and number of procedure codes were factors that influenced MLR, while patient discharge status, billed admission charge, and length of stay influenced the GBM model. The GBM model significantly outperformed MLR in predicting unplanned readmissions (mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.846 vs. 0.829; p < 0.001), while also projecting an average cost savings of 50% more than the LACE index. Conclusion: Five models (GBM, XGBoost [extreme gradient boosting], RF [random forest], LASSO [least absolute shrinkage and selection operator], and MLR) were evaluated, among which, the GBM model exhibited superior predictive performance, robustness, and accuracy. Factors associated with readmissions impact LR and GBM models differently, suggesting that these models can be used complementarily. When analyzing PCF procedures, the GBM model resulted in greater predictive performance and was associated with higher theoretical cost savings for readmissions associated with PCF complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: We propose that cervical intrafacetal fusion (cIFF) using bone chip insertion into the facetal joint space additional to minimal PLF is a supplementary fusion method to conventional posterolateral fusion (PLF). Methods: Patients who underwent posterior cervical fixation accompanied by cIFF with minimal PLF or conventional PLF for cervical myelopathy from 2012 to 2023 were investigated retrospectively. Radiological parameters including Cobb angle and C2–7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA) were compared between the 2 groups. In cIFF with minimal PLF group, cIFF location and PLF location were carefully divided, and the fusion rates of each location were analyzed by computed tomography scan. Results: Among enrolled 46 patients, 31 patients were in cIFF group, 15 in PLF group. The postoperative change of Cobb angle in 1-year follow-up in cIFF with minimal PLF group and conventional PLF group were 0.1° ± 4.0° and -9.7° ± 8.4° respectively which was statistically lower in cIFF with minimal PLF group (p = 0.022). Regarding the fusion rate in cIFF with minimal PLF group in postoperative 6 months, the rates was achieved in 267 facets (98.1%) in cIFF location, and 244 facets (89.7%) in PLF location (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Postoperative sagittal alignment was more preserved in cIFF with minimal PLF group compared with conventional PLF group. Additionally, in cIFF with minimal PLF group, the bone fusion rate of cIFF location was higher than PLF location. Considering the concerns of bone chip migration onto the spinal cord and relatively low fusion rate in PLF method, applying cIFF method using minimized PLF might be a beneficial alternative for posterior cervical decompression and fixation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Posterior cervical fusion (PCF) with lateral mass screws is a favorable treatment option to revise a symptomatic pseudarthrosis due to reliable rates of arthrodesis; however, this technique introduces elevated risk for wound infection and hospital readmission. A tissue-sparing PCF approach involving facet fixation instrumentation reduces the rates of postoperative complications while stabilizing the symptomatic level to achieve arthrodesis; however, these outcomes have been limited to small study cohorts from individual surgeons commonly with mixed indications for treatment. Materials and Methods: One hundred and fifty cases were identified from a retrospective chart review performed by seven surgeons across six sites in the United States. All cases involved PCF revision for a pseudarthrosis at one or more levels from C3 to C7 following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). PCF was performed using a tissue-sparing technique with facet instrumentation. Cases involving additional supplemental fixation such as lateral mass screws, rods, wires, or other hardware were excluded. Demographics, operative notes, postoperative complications, hospital readmission, and subsequent surgical interventions were summarized as an entire cohort and according to the following risk factors: age, sex, number of levels revised, body mass index (BMI), and history of nicotine use. Results: The average age of patients at the time of PCF revision was 55 ± 11 years and 63% were female. The average BMI was 29 ± 6 kg/m2 and 19% reported a history of nicotine use. Postoperative follow-up visits were available with a median of 68 days (interquartile range = 41–209 days) from revision PCF. There were 91 1-level, 49 2-level, 8 3-level, and 2 4±-level PCF revision cases. The mean operative duration was 52 ± 3 min with an estimated blood loss of 14 ± 1.5cc. Participants were discharged an average of 1 ± 0.05 days following surgery. Multilevel treatment resulted in longer procedure times (single = 45 min, multi = 59 min, P = 0.01) but did not impact estimated blood loss (P = 0.94). Total nights in the hospital increased by 0.2 nights with multilevel treatment (P = 0.01). Sex, age, nicotine history, and BMI had no effect on recorded perioperative outcomes. There was one instance of rehospitalization due to deep-vein thrombosis, one instance of persistent pseudarthrosis at the revised level treated with ACDF, and four instances of adjacent segment disease. In patients initially treated with multilevel ACDF, revisions occurred most commonly on the caudal level (48% of revised levels), followed by the cranial (43%), and least often in the middle level (9%). Conclusions: This chart review of perioperative and safety outcomes provides evidence in support of tissue-sparing PCF with facet instrumentation as a treatment for symptomatic pseudarthrosis after ACDF. The most common locations requiring revision were the caudal and cranial levels. Operative duration and estimated blood loss were favorable when compared to open alternatives. There were no instances of postoperative wound infection, and the majority of patients were discharged the day following surgery.

Background: Posterior cervical fusion (PCF) with lateral mass screws is a favorable treatment option to revise a symptomatic pseudarthrosis due to reliable rates of arthrodesis; however, this technique introduces elevated risk for wound infection and hospital readmission. A tissue-sparing PCF approach involving facet fixation instrumentation reduces the rates of postoperative complications while stabilizing the symptomatic level to achieve arthrodesis; however, these outcomes have been limited to small study cohorts from individual surgeons commonly with mixed indications for treatment. Materials and Methods: One hundred and fifty cases were identified from a retrospective chart review performed by seven surgeons across six sites in the United States. All cases involved PCF revision for a pseudarthrosis at one or more levels from C3 to C7 following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). PCF was performed using a tissue-sparing technique with facet instrumentation. Cases involving additional supplemental fixation such as lateral mass screws, rods, wires, or other hardware were excluded. Demographics, operative notes, postoperative complications, hospital readmission, and subsequent surgical interventions were summarized as an entire cohort and according to the following risk factors: age, sex, number of levels revised, body mass index (BMI), and history of nicotine use. Results: The average age of patients at the time of PCF revision was 55 ± 11 years and 63% were female. The average BMI was 29 ± 6 kg/m2 and 19% reported a history of nicotine use. Postoperative follow-up visits were available with a median of 68 days (interquartile range = 41-209 days) from revision PCF. There were 91 1-level, 49 2-level, 8 3-level, and 2 4±-level PCF revision cases. The mean operative duration was 52 ± 3 min with an estimated blood loss of 14 ± 1.5cc. Participants were discharged an average of 1 ± 0.05 days following surgery. Multilevel treatment resulted in longer procedure times (single = 45 min, multi = 59 min, P = 0.01) but did not impact estimated blood loss (P = 0.94). Total nights in the hospital increased by 0.2 nights with multilevel treatment (P = 0.01). Sex, age, nicotine history, and BMI had no effect on recorded perioperative outcomes. There was one instance of rehospitalization due to deep-vein thrombosis, one instance of persistent pseudarthrosis at the revised level treated with ACDF, and four instances of adjacent segment disease. In patients initially treated with multilevel ACDF, revisions occurred most commonly on the caudal level (48% of revised levels), followed by the cranial (43%), and least often in the middle level (9%). Conclusions: This chart review of perioperative and safety outcomes provides evidence in support of tissue-sparing PCF with facet instrumentation as a treatment for symptomatic pseudarthrosis after ACDF. The most common locations requiring revision were the caudal and cranial levels. Operative duration and estimated blood loss were favorable when compared to open alternatives. There were no instances of postoperative wound infection, and the majority of patients were discharged the day following surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) is effective for promoting robust fusion for long-level cervical deformity and revision surgeries. However, only a few studies have reported its efficacy and complications in posterior cervical fusion (PCF). Therefore we evaluated the efficacy and complications of rhBMP-2 application in PCF surgery by searching 3 electronic databases (PubMed, Cochrane Database, and EMBASE) for studies that evaluated the use of rhBMP-2 in PCF. Five studies (1 prospective and 4 retrospective) were included in the meta-analysis. The quality of each study was assessed, and data on pseudarthrosis, wound infection, neurologic, and immediate medical complications were extracted and analyzed. We found that the use of rhBMP-2 in PCF showed significant benefits in terms of pseudarthrosis and no significant increases in the risk for neurologic and immediate medical complications regardless of the dose. However, high-dose (>2.1 mg/level) rhBMP-2 was a risk factor for wound infection after PCF. Our meta-analysis of the currently available literature suggests that patients with PCF may benefit from BMP-2 usage without increasing the risk of complications. However, dose control and containment are important to ensure a low risk of complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: While there is anecdotal evidence that the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic altered perioperative decision-making in patients requiring posterior cervical fusion (PCF), a national-level analysis to examine the significance of this hypothesis has not yet been conducted. This study aimed to determine the potential differences in perioperative variables and surgical outcomes of PCF performed before vs. during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Adults who underwent PCF were identified in the 2019 (prepandemic) and 2020 (intrapandemic) NSQIP datasets. Differences in 30-day readmission, reoperation, and morbidity were evaluated using multivariate logistic regression. On the other hand, differences in operative time and relative value units (RVUs) were estimated using quantile regression. Furthermore, the odds ratios (OR) for length of stay (LOS) were estimated using negative binomial regression. Secondary outcomes included rates of nonhome discharge and outpatient surgery. Results: A total of 3,444 patients were included in this study (50.7% from 2020). Readmission, reoperation, morbidity, operative time, and RVUs per minute were similar between cohorts (p>0.05). The LOS (OR 1.086, p

PurposePosterior cervical fusion is associated with increased rates of complications and readmission when compared to anterior fusion. Machine learning (ML) models for risk stratification of patients undergoing posterior cervical fusion remain limited. We aim to develop a novel ensemble ML algorithm for prediction of major perioperative complications and readmission after posterior cervical fusion and identify factors important to model performance.MethodsThis is a retrospective cohort study of adults who underwent posterior cervical fusion at non-federal California hospitals between 2015 and 2017. The primary outcome was readmission or major complication. We developed an ensemble model predicting complication risk using an automated ML framework. We compared performance with standard ML models and logistic regression (LR), ranking contribution of included variables to model performance.ResultsOf the included 6822 patients, 18.8% suffered a major complication or readmission. The ensemble model demonstrated slightly superior predictive performance compared to LR and standard ML models. The most important features to performance include sex, malignancy, pneumonia, stroke, and teaching hospital status. Seven of the ten most important features for the ensemble model were markedly less important for LR.ConclusionWe report an ensemble ML model for prediction of major complications and readmission after posterior cervical fusion with a modest risk prediction advantage compared to LR and benchmark ML models. Notably, the features most important to the ensemble are markedly different from those for LR, suggesting that advanced ML methods may identify novel prognostic factors for adverse outcomes after posterior cervical fusion.

Study design: Retrospective cohort. Objective: The purpose of the study was to evaluate differences across surgical approaches (anterior, posterior, or combined anterior-posterior) in terms of outcomes following treatment for floating lateral mass (FLM) fractures. Furthermore, we sought to determine whether operative approach to FLM fracture treatment remains superior to nonoperative treatment in terms of clinical outcomes. Background data: FLM fractures of the subaxial cervical spine involves separation of the lateral mass from the vertebrae via a disruption of both the lamina and pedicle, resulting in a disconnection of the superior and inferior articular processes. This subset of cervical spine fractures is highly unstable, making proper treatment selection of great importance. Methods: In this single-center, retrospective study, we identified patients meeting the definition of an FLM fracture. Radiological imaging from the date of injury was reviewed to ensure presence this injury pattern. Treatment course was assessed to determine nonoperative versus operative treatment. Operative treatment was divided into patients who underwent anterior, posterior, or combined anterior-posterior spinal fusion. We then reviewed postoperative complications among each of the subgroups. Results: Forty-five patients were determined to have a FLM fracture over a 10-year span. The nonoperative group had n=25, and evidently, there were no patients that crossed over to surgery due to subluxation of the cervical spine after nonoperative treatment. The operative treatment group had n=20, and consisted of 6 anterior, 12 posterior, and 2 combined approaches. Complications appeared in posterior and combined groups. Two hardware failures were noted in the posterior group, along with two postoperative respiratory complications in the combined group. No complications were observed for the anterior group. Conclusions: None of the nonoperative patients in this study required further operation or management of their injury, indicating nonoperative treatment as a potentially satisfactory management for appropriately selected FLM fractures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design: Retrospective Cohort Study Objectives: To determine if decreased preoperative symptom duration is associated with greater clinical improvement in function and myelopathic symptoms after posterior cervical decompression and fusion (PCDF). Methods: All patients over age 18 who underwent primary PCDF for cervical myelopathy or myeloradiculopathy at a single institution between 2014 and 2020 were retrospectively identified. Patient demographics, surgical characteristics, duration of symptoms, and preoperative and postoperative patient reported outcomes measures (PROMs) including modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA), Neck Disability Index (NDI), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Neck, VAS Arm, and SF-12 were collected. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to compare change in PROMs and minimum clinically important difference achievement (%MCID) between symptom duration groups (< 6 months, 6 months–2 years, > 2 years). Results: Preoperative symptom duration groups differed significantly by sex and smoking status. Patients with < 6 months of preoperative symptoms improved significantly in all PROMs. Patients with 6 months–2 years of preoperative symptoms did not improve significantly in mJOA, Physical Component Scores (PCS), or NDI. Patients with > 2 years of symptoms failed to demonstrate significant improvement in mJOA, NDI, or Mental Component Scores (MCS). Univariate analysis demonstrated significantly decreased improvement in mJOA with longer symptom durations. Increased preoperative symptom duration trended toward decreased %MCID for mJOA and MCS. Regression analysis demonstrated that preoperative symptom duration of > 2 years relative to < 6 months predicted decreased improvement in mJOA and NDI and decreased MCID achievement for mJOA and MCS. Conclusion: Increased duration of preoperative symptoms (> 2 years) before undergoing PCDF was associated with decreased postoperative improvement in myelopathic symptoms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study Objectives: To evaluate the effect of caudal instrumentation level on revision rates following posterior cervical laminectomy and fusion. Methods: A retrospective review of a prospectively collected database was performed. Minimum follow-up was one year. Patients were divided into two groups based on the caudal level of their index fusion construct (Group 1-cervical and Group 2- thoracic). Reoperation rates were compared between the two groups, and preoperative demographics and radiographic parameters were compared between patients who required revision and those who did not. Multivariate binomial regression analysis was performed to determine independent risk factors for revision surgery. Results: One hundred thirty-seven (137/204) patients received fusion constructs that terminated at C7 (Group 1), while 67 (67/204) received fusion constructs that terminated at T1 or T2 (Group 2). The revision rate was 8.33% in the combined cohort, 7.3% in Group 1, and 10.4% in Group 2. There was no significant difference in revision rates between the 2 groups (P =.43). Multivariate regression analysis did not identify any independent risk factors for revision surgery. Conclusion: This study shows no evidence of increased risk of revision in patients with fusion constructs terminating in the cervical spine when compared to patients with constructs crossing the cervicothoracic junction. These findings support terminating the fusion construct proximal to the cervicothoracic junction when indicated. Level of Evidence: III [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design A retrospective cohort study. Purpose To determine whether the 11-item modified frailty index (mFI) is associated with readmission rates, complication rates, revision rates, or differences in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for patients undergoing posterior cervical decompression and fusion (PCDF). Overview of Literature mFI incorporates preexisting medical comorbidities and dependency status to determine physiological reserve. Based on previous literature, it may be used as a predictive tool for identifying postoperative clinical and surgical outcomes. Methods Patients undergoing elective PCDF at our urban academic medical center from 2014 to 2020 were included. Patients were categorized by mFI scores (0–0.08, 0.09–0.17, 0.18–0.26, and ≥0.27). Univariate statistics compared demographics, comorbidities, and clinical/surgical outcomes. Multiple linear regression analysis evaluated the magnitude of improvement in PROMs at 1 year. Results A total of 165 patients were included and grouped by mFI scores: 0 (n=36), 0.09 (n=62), 0.18 (n=42), and ≥0.27 (n=30). The severe frailty group (mFI ≥0.27) was significantly more likely to be diabetic (p

Study Design.: Retrospective cross-sectional review of a large database Objective.: Little is known regarding extension K-lines for treatment of cervical myelopathy. Therefore, this study seeks to examine differences between K-lines drawn in neutral and extension. Summary of Background Data.: The modified K-line is a radiological tool used in surgical planning of the cervical spine. As posterior cervical decompression and fusion often results in patients being fused in a more lordotic position than the preoperative neutral radiograph, a K-line measured in the extension position may offer better utility for these patients. Materials and Methods.: Total of 97 patients were selected with T2-weighted, upright cervical magnetic resonance imaging taken in neutral and extension. For each patient, the K-line was drawn at the mid-sagittal position for both neutral and extension. The distance from the most posterior portion of each disk (between C2 and C7) to the K-line was measured in neutral and extension and the difference was calculated. Paired t test was used to assess significant differences. Results.: Across all levels between C2 and C7 there was an increase in the distance between the dorsal aspect of the disk and K-line when comparing neutral and extension radiographs. The average change in difference (extension minus neutral) at each cervical spinal level was 0.9 mm (C2–C3), 2.5 mm (C3–C4), 2.6 mm (C4–C5), 2.0 mm (C5–C6), and 0.9 mm (C6–C7). A paired t test showed that the K-line increase from neutral to extension was statistically significant across all disk levels (P <0.001). Conclusion.: When positioned in extension, patients experience a significant increase in distance from the dorsal aspect of a disk to the K-line compared to when positioned in neutral, especially between C3 and C6. This is clinically relevant for surgeons considering a posterior cervical decompression and fusion in patients with a negative modified K-line on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging, as these patients may have enough cervical cord drift back when fused in an extended position, maximizing likelihood of improving postoperative DSM functional outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective C2 slope (C2S), a cervical parameter mathematically approximated as T1 slope minus cervical lordosis (T1S–CL), predicts functional improvement in cervical deformity patients. Nonetheless, C2S is a positional parameter based only on the horizontal axis. The current study aims to introduce novel odontoid parameters and establish their relationships with patient-reported health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Methods Lateral plain radiographs of 32 adults who underwent multilevel posterior cervical fusion were analyzed. The odontoid parameters included odontoid incidence (OI), C2S, odontoid tilt (OT), and gravity line-C2 distance (GL-C2), while the cervical parameters were the Cobb angle at C0–1, C1–2, C0–2, C2–7, C2–7 sagittal vertical axis (cSVA), T1 slope, and T1S–CL. The range of motion (ROM) of the occipito-atlantoaxial complex was measured in flexion and extension plain radiographs. Scores on the Neck Disability Index (NDI) and visual analogue scale (VAS) for axial neck (VASn) and arm pain were measured. Results Compared to asymptomatic subjects, patients had larger C2S, cSVA, and T1S–CL, and smaller OT. Preoperatively, OI was significantly correlated with the ROM of C1–2 (r = 0.37, p < 0.05) and C0–2 (r = 0.46, p < 0.01). OT and C2S had significant correlations with the C0–1, C1–2, and C0–2 angles, GL-C2, and T1S–CL. Postoperative NDI scores were significantly correlated with OI (r = -0.40, p < 0.05) and OT (ρ = -0.37, p < 0.05). VASn was significantly correlated with GL-C2 (r = -0.35, p < 0.05). Conclusion The odontoid parameters were significantly correlated with established cervical parameters and HRQoL measures. OI is a constant parameter representing the individual's compensatory reservoir at the upper cervical spine.

Background: Posterior cervical decompression and fusion (PCF) is a common procedure for treating patients with multilevel degenerative cervical spine disease. The selection of lower instrumented vertebra (LIV) relative to the cervicothoracic junction (CTJ) remains controversial. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of PCF construct terminating at the lower cervical spine and crossing the CTJ. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed for relevant studies in the PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library database. Complications, rate of reoperation, surgical data, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and radiographic outcomes were compared between PCF construct terminating at or above C7 (cervical group) and at or below T1 (thoracic group) in patients with multilevel degenerative cervical spine disease. A subgroup analysis based on surgical techniques and indications was performed. Results: Fifteen retrospective cohort studies comprising 2071 patients (1163 in the cervical group and 908 in the thoracic group) were included. The cervical group was associated with a lower incidence of wound-related complications (RR, 0.58; 95% CI 0.36 to 0.92, p = 0.022; 831 patients in cervical group vs. 692 patients in thoracic group), a lower reoperation rate for wound-related complications (RR, 0.55; 95% CI 0.32 to 0.96, p = 0.034; 768 vs. 624 patients), and less neck pain at the final follow-up (WMD, −0.58; 95% CI −0.93 to −0.23, p = 0.001; 327 vs. 268 patients). However the cervical group also developed a higher incidence of overall adjacent segment disease (ASD, including distal ASD and proximal ASD) (RR, 1.87; 95% CI 1.27 to 2.76, p = 0.001; 1079 vs. 860 patients), distal ASD (RR, 2.18; 95% CI 1.36 to 3.51, p = 0.001; 642 vs. 555 patients), overall hardware failure (including hardware failure of LIV and hardware failure occurring at other instrumented vertebra) (RR, 1.48; 95% CI 1.02 to 2.15, p = 0.040; 614 vs. 451 patients), and hardware failure of LIV (RR, 1.89; 95% CI 1.21 to 2.95, p = 0.005; 380 vs. 339 patients). The operating time was reasonably shorter (WMD, −43.47; 95% CI −59.42 to −27.52, p < 0.001; 611 vs. 570 patients) and the estimated blood loss was lower (WMD, −143.77; 95% CI −185.90 to −101.63, p < 0.001; 721 vs. 740 patients) when the PCF construct did not cross the CTJ. Conclusions: PCF construct crossing the CTJ was associated with a lower incidence of ASD and hardware failure but a higher incidence of wound-related complications and a small increase in qualitative neck pain, without difference in neck disability on the NDI. Based on the subgroup analysis for surgical techniques and indications, prophylactic crossing of the CTJ should be considered for patients with concurrent instability, ossification, deformity, or a combination of anterior approach surgeries as well. However, long-term follow-up outcomes and patient selection-related factors such as bone quality, frailty, and nutrition status should be addressed in further studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design: A retrospective cohort study. Purpose: To determine whether the 11-item modified frailty index (mFI) is associated with readmission rates, complication rates, revision rates, or differences in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for patients undergoing posterior cervical decompression and fusion (PCDF). Overview of Literature: mFI incorporates preexisting medical comorbidities and dependency status to determine physiological reserve. Based on previous literature, it may be used as a predictive tool for identifying postoperative clinical and surgical outcomes. Methods: Patients undergoing elective PCDF at our urban academic medical center from 2014 to 2020 were included. Patients were categorized by mFI scores (0-0.08, 0.09-0.17, 0.18-0.26, and =0.27). Univariate statistics compared demographics, comorbidities, and clinical/surgical outcomes. Multiple linear regression analysis evaluated the magnitude of improvement in PROMs at 1 year. Results: A total of 165 patients were included and grouped by mFI scores: 0 (n=36), 0.09 (n=62), 0.18 (n=42), and ≥0.27 (n=30). The severe frailty group (mFI ≥0.27) was significantly more likely to be diabetic (p <0.001) and have a greater Elixhauser comorbidity index (p =0.001). They also had worse baseline Physical Component Score-12 (PCS-12) (p =0.011) and modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) (p =0.012) scores and worse 1-year postoperative PCS-12 (p =0.008) and mJOA (p =0.001) scores. On regression analysis, an mFI score of 0.18 was an independent predictor of greater improvement in ΔVisual Analog Scale neck (ß =-2.26, p =0.022) and ΔVAS arm (ß =-1.76, p =0.042). Regardless of frailty status, patients had similar 90-day readmission rates (p =0.752), complication rates (p =0.223), and revision rates (p =0.814), but patients with severe frailty were more likely to have longer hospital length of stay (p =0.006) and require non-home discharge (p <0.001). Conclusions: Similar improvements across most PROMs can be expected irrespective of the frailty status of patients undergoing PCDF. Complication rates, 90-day readmission rates, and revision rates are not significantly different when stratified by frailty status. However, patients with severe frailty are more likely to have longer hospital stays and require non-home discharge. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ObjectiveThis retrospective cohort study seeks to identify risk factors associated with complications following posterior cervical laminectomy and fusion (PCLF) surgery.MethodsAdults undergoing PCLF from 2012 through 2018 at a single center were identified. Demographic and radiographic data, surgical characteristics, and complication rates were compared. Multivariate logistic regression models identified independent predictors of complications following surgery.ResultsA total of 196 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in the study. The medical, surgical, and overall complication rates were 10.2%, 23.0%, and 29.1% respectively. Risk factors associated with medical complications in multivariate analysis included impaired ambulation status (odds ratio [OR], 2.27; p=0.02) and estimated blood loss over 500 mL (OR, 3.67; p=0.02). Multivariate analysis revealed preoperative narcotic use (OR, 2.43; p=0.02) and operative time (OR, 1.005; p=0.03) as risk factors for surgical complication, whereas antidepressant use was a protective factor (OR, 0.21; p=0.01). Overall complication was associated with preoperative narcotic use (OR, 1.97; p=0.04) and higher intraoperative blood loss (OR, 1.0007; p=0.03).ConclusionPreoperative narcotic use and estimated blood loss predicted the incidence of complications following PCLF for CSM. Ambulation status was a significant predictor of the development of a medical complication specifically. These results may help surgeons in counseling patients who may be at increased risk of complication following surgery.

Study Design: Systematic review and Meta-analysis. Objective: This systematic review seeks to compare fusion, reoperation and complication rates, estimated blood loss (EBL), and surgical time between multi-level instrumented fusions with LIVs (lowest instrumented vertebra) in the cervical spine and those that extend into the thoracic spine. Summary of Background Data: Several studies address the question of whether to extend a long-segment, posterior cervical fusions, performed for degenerative disease, into the upper thoracic spine. Recommendations for appropriate LIV continue to vary. Methods: A comprehensive computerized literature search through multiple electronic databases without date limits up until April 3rd, 2020 using combinations of key search terms and sets of inclusion/exclusion criteria was performed. Results: Our comprehensive literature search yielded 3852 studies. Of these, 8 articles consisting of 1162 patients were included in the meta-analysis. In 61.2% of the patients, the fusion did not cross the cervicothoracic junction (CTJ) (cervical LIV, CLV). In the remaining 38.8%, the fusion extended into the upper thoracic spine (thoracic LIV, TLV). Overall, mean patient age was 62.5 years (range: 58.8-66.1 years). Our direct analysis showed that odds of fusion were not statistically different between the CLV and TLV groups (OR:.648, 95% CI:.336-1.252, P =.197). Similarly, odds of reoperation (OR: 0.726, 95% CI: 0.493-1.068, P =.104) and complication rates were similar between the 2 groups (OR: 1.214, 95% CI: 0.0.750-1.965, P =.430). Standardized mean difference (SMD) for the blood loss (SMD:.728, 95% CI: 0.554-.901, P =.000) and operative (SMD: 0.653, 95% CI:.479-.826, P =.000) differed significantly between the 2 groups. The indirect analysis showed similar fusion (Effect Size (ES)TLV:.892, 95% CI:.840-.928 vs ESCLV:0.894, 95% CI:0.849-.926); reoperation rate (ESTLV:0.112, 95% CI: 0.075-.164 vs ESCLV:.125, 95% CI:.071-.211) and complication rates (ESTLV:.108, 95% CI:.074-.154 vs ESCLV:0.081, 95% CI:.040-.156). Conclusions: Our meta-analysis showed that fusion, complication, and reoperation rates did not differ significantly between patients in whom multi-level posterior fusions ended in the cervical spine vs those of which was extended into the thoracic spine. The mean blood loss, operative time and length of stay were significantly lower in patients with CLV at C6 or C7, compared to their counterparts. These data suggest that, absent focal, C7-T1 pathology, extension of long, posterior cervical fusions into the thoracic spine may not be necessary. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Retrospective. In multilevel posterior cervical fusion, whether to stop distal fixation at C7 or T1, remains a matter of debate. We aimed to assess clinical feasibility of C7 as distal fixation point and sought to compare complication rates and radiological outcome between lateral mass screws and pedicle screws at C7. Current literature remains inconclusive regarding need for thoracic extension of instrumentation in multilevel posterior cervical fusion. We did a retrospective review of 44 consecutive patients who underwent posterior instrumented cervical decompression and fusion for degenerative cervical myelopathy with C7 as distal fixation point, and a minimum follow-up period of two years. We had two groups of patients based on C7 instrumentation. Lateral mass screw fixation. Pedicle screw fixation. Post-operative clinico-radiological evaluation of whole study population Secondary outcome : Comparison of complication rates and radiological outcome between groups 1 and 2. Mean age was 58.06 ± 14.4 years with average follow-up duration of 35.4 ± 4.5 months. There were 18 patients in Group 1 and 26 patients in Group 2. Mean pre-operative mJOA score was 10.51 and post-operative mJOA score was 15.74 with mean recovery rate (RR) 69.82%, of which 30 patients (70.23%) had good recovery and 14 patients (29.77%) had fair recovery at final follow up. The two groups didn't show any significant difference in complication rates and outcome. C7 as distal fixation anchor is safe and effective in maintaining cervical sagittal balance following multilevel posterior cervical fusion. C7 lateral mass screws are found to be equally efficacious as pedicle screws in preventing worsening of sagittal profile. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design: A retrospective cohort study.Objective: To determine if depression and/or anxiety significantly affect patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after posterior cervical decompression and fusion (PCDF).Summary Of Background Data: Mental health diagnoses are receiving increased recognition for their influence of outcomes after spine surgery. The magnitude that mental health disorders contribute to patient-reported outcomes following PCDF requires increased awareness and understanding.Materials and Methods: A review of electronic medical records identified patients who underwent a PCDF at a single institution during the years 2013-2020. Patients were placed into either depression/anxiety or nondepression/anxiety group based on their medical history. A delta score (∆) was calculated for all PROMs by subtracting postoperative from preoperative scores. χ 2 tests and t tests were utilized to analyze categorical and continuous data, respectively. Regression analysis determined independent predictors of change in PROMs. Alpha was set at 0.05.Results: A total of 195 patients met inclusion criteria, with 60 (30.8%) having a prior diagnosis of depression/anxiety. The depression/anxiety group was younger (58.8 vs . 63.0, P =0.012), predominantly female (53.3% vs . 31.9%, P =0.007), and more frequently required revision surgery (11.7% vs . 0.74%, P =0.001). In addition, they had worse baseline mental component (MCS-12) (42.2 vs . 48.6, P <0.001), postoperative MCS-12 (46.5 vs . 52.9, P =0.002), postoperative neck disability index (NDI) (40.7 vs . 28.5, P =0.001), ∆NDI (-1.80 vs . -8.93, P =0.010), NDI minimum clinically important difference improvement (15.0% vs . 29.6%, P =0.046), and postoperative Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Neck scores (3.63 vs . 2.48, P =0.018). Only the nondepression/anxiety group improved in MCS-12 ( P =0.002) and NDI ( P <0.001) postoperatively. Depression and/or anxiety was an independent predictor of decreased magnitude of NDI improvement on regression analysis (β=7.14, P =0.038).Conclusion: Patients with history of depression or anxiety demonstrate less improvement in patient-reported outcomes and a higher revision rate after posterior cervical fusion, highlighting the importance of mental health on clinical outcomes after spine surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Context: Arthrodesis is important for the success of posterior cervical fusion (PCF), however, there exists limited data regarding the safety and efficacy of bone morphogenic protein (BMP) in PCF.Purpose: The primary objective was to evaluate early postoperative complications associated with BMP in PCF and determine whether BMP leads to adverse early clinical outcomes. A secondary objective was to determine the optimal location for BMP sponge placement, within the facet joint (IF) or elsewhere, and the optimal dosage/level.Design: Retrospective, consecutive case-control study.Patient Sample: Seven hundred sixty-five patients who underwent PCF OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs), complications, arthrodesis, optimum dose/level of BMP METHODS: Surgical data, including preoperative diagnosis, levels fused, type of bone graft, BMP dose (when used), and fusion technique were recorded. Complications were assessed by reviewing the medical record encompassing the first 6-weeks postoperative. These included medical, neurological, and wound-related complications and reoperation. Neurological complications were defined as any new weakness, radicular pain, or numbness. PROs were collected, including SF36, VAS, EQ-5D, and NDI scores. To determine the optimal dosage and location for BMP placement, a sub-analysis was performed.Results: There were no significant differences between the BMP and no BMP group with regards to wound complications, neurological complications, or reoperation. There were no differences in PROs between BMP and no BMP. Placement of BMP for IF and at a dose of 0.87 mg/level minimized wound-related complications. The BMP group had a higher fusion rate compared to the no BMP group (96% vs. 91%, p=.02) when assessed 1 year post-operatively.Conclusion: BMP was not associated with a higher rate of early complications after PCF when the dose was minimized. Complications thought to be associated with BMP, such as compressive seroma, radiculitis, and wound-related complications were not seen at a higher rate. PROs at early follow-up were similar. Placement of BMP for IF and at lower doses than previously reported may minimize complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The purpose of this retrospective cohort study was to investigate the impact of smoking on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) following elective posterior cervical decompression and fusion (PCF). Electronic medical records at a single institution were reviewed for patients undergoing elective PCF. Patients were grouped based on smoking history: current smokers, former smokers, and never smokers. A delta score (Δ) was calculated for all PROMs (postoperative minus preoperative scores). Continuous and categorical data were compared using analysis of variance or χ2 tests. Regression analysis controlled for demographics. Patients were then regrouped into current smokers and nonsmokers for reanalysis. A total of 195 patients were included, of whom 35 (22.1%) were current smokers, 51 (26.2%) were former smokers, and 101 (51.8%) were never smokers. Preoperative and postoperative Short-Form 12 Mental Component Score (MCS-12) were significantly lower in the current smoker group (preoperative: current 42.7, former 49.9, and never 46.6; P = 0.024; postoperative: current 44.6, former 53.7, and never 52.2; P = 0.003). Only never smokers improved in MCS-12 and Neck Disability Index following surgery. On regrouping, current smokers had significantly lower preoperative MCS-12 (42.7 vs. 47.7, P = 0.031), lower preoperative modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (12.2 vs. 14.0, P = 0.039), greater preoperative visual analog scale Arm (6.39 vs. 4.94, P = 0.025), and lower postoperative MCS-12 (44.6 vs. 52.7, P = 0.001). Only the nonsmokers improved in MCS-12 and Neck Disability Index following surgery. On regression analysis, smoking was not an independent predictor of ΔPROMs. Univariate analysis found that smokers have worse symptoms at baseline. However, smoking status was not an independent predictor of improvement in ΔPROMs following elective PCF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) is useful during spinal cord operations, but whether IONM is necessary for posterior cervical surgeries for degenerative conditions is unknown. We evaluated the utility of somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) and motor evoked potential (MEP) monitoring as a tool for predicting new postoperative neurologic deficits during posterior decompression and fusion for degenerative cervical spine conditions. We retrospectively reviewed posterior cervical operations performed at our institute over a 4-year period. Patients with postoperative neurologic deficits were identified, and a detailed analysis performed to ascertain whether SSEP or MEP monitoring accurately predicted the onset of new postoperative deficits. Overall, 498 patients were included in the analysis (median age 66 years; range: 22–93 years). SSEP monitoring was performed in all patients, and both SSEP and MEP monitoring were performed in 121 patients (24%). Twenty-one patients (4.2%) had new postoperative neurologic deficits. SSEP had significantly higher specificity (90%) but lower sensitivity (33%) than MEP (74% specificity [ P = 0.008], 50% sensitivity [ P = 0.01]) for detecting neurologic compromise intraoperatively. For SSEP, the positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) in detecting intraoperative changes that translated to new postoperative neurological deficits were 12% and 97%, respectively, whereas for MEP, the PPV and NPV were 6% (P = 0.009) and 98% (P = 0.20), respectively. IONM during posterior cervical operations for degenerative conditions of the spine is not reliable at predicting new postoperative neurologic deficits in patients treated for degenerative conditions, but may provide peace of mind to the surgeon intraoperatively when no abnormalities are detected. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Previous literature has associated increased body mass index (BMI) with risk of surgical site infection (SSI) after posterior cervical fusion (PCF) surgery. However, few studies have examined the association between local adiposity and risk of SSI, re-admission, and re-operation after PCF. Local adiposity is easily measured on pre-operative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and may act as a more accurate predictor compared with BMI. Patients and Methods: Subjects undergoing PCF from 2013-2018 at a single institution were identified retrospectively. Posterior cervical subcutaneous fat thickness, paraspinal muscle thickness, and lamina-to-skin distance measurements were obtained from computed tomography (CT) or MRI scans. Subjects with active infection, malignancy, or revision procedures were excluded. Results: Two hundred five patients were included with 20 developing SSIs. Subjects with SSIs had a longer fusion construct (4.90 vs. 3.71 levels; p = 0.001), higher Elixhauser comorbidity index (ECI; 2.05 vs. 1.34; p = 0.045), had a history of diabetes mellitus (30% vs. 10.8%; p = 0.026), higher subcutaneous fat thickness (30.5 vs. 23.6 mm; p = 0.013), and higher lamina-to-skin distance (66.4 vs. 57.9 mm; p = 0.027). Subcutaneous fat thickness (odds ratio [OR], 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.10]; p = 0.026) and lamina-to-skin distance (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.01-1.09]; p = 0.014) were associated with SSI in multivariable analysis. A subcutaneous fat thickness cutoff value of 23.2 mm had 90% sensitivity and 54.1% specificity for prediction of SSI. There was no association need for re-admission or re-operation. Conclusions: Increased posterior cervical fat may increase the risk of SSI after PCF. Pre-operative advanced imaging may be a valuable tool for assisting with patient counseling, optimization, and risk stratification. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To compare patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) following posterior cervical decompression and fusion (PCDF) based on changes in perioperative cervical sagittal alignment. We reviewed patients who underwent PCDF from C2 to T2 between the years 2015 and 2020. C2 sagittal vertical axis (SVA) and C2–C7 lordosis were assessed preoperatively and 1-year postoperatively. Neck Disability Index (NDI) and visual analog scale (VAS) Neck scores were collected preoperatively, 3 months' postoperatively, and 1-year postoperatively. PROMs were compared based on perioperative radiographic parameters. Eighty-five patients were included in this study. Patients with preoperative C2 SVA <40 mm had a larger improvement in VAS Neck pain scores at 3 months' postoperatively (–4.9 vs. –3.0, P = 0.03) and a larger decrease in NDI scores at 1-year postoperatively (7.2 vs. 3.1, P = 0.04) than patients with C2 SVA ≥40 mm. Patients with postoperative C2 SVA <40 mm demonstrated lower VAS Neck pain scores at 3 months' postoperatively (2.0 vs. 3.4, P = 0.049). The cohort of patients with a decrease of C2 SVA by ≥5 mm demonstrated lower NDI at 3 months' postoperatively but not at 1-year postoperatively in comparison with patients whose C2 SVA increased or remained unchanged (11.7 vs. 23.8 vs. 18.2; P < 0.001). Patients in whom both C2 SVA and C2–C7 lordosis improved demonstrated superior NDI (P < 0.001) and VAS Neck (P = 0.007) at 3 months' but not at 1-year postoperatively. In a uniform cohort of patients undergoing PCDF from C2 to T2, improvements in C2 SVA and C2–C7 lordosis were associated with improved early postoperative PROMs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study.Objective: (a) Compare operative variables, complications, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients with an upper instrumented vertebrae (UIV) of C2 versus C3/4, and (b) assess outcomes based on C2 screw type.Summary Of Background Data: When performing elective posterior cervical laminectomy and fusion (PCLF), spine surgeons must choose the upper instrumented vertebrae (UIV) at the subaxial cervical spine (C3/4) versus C2. Differences in long-term complications and PROs remain unknown.Methods: A single-institution, retrospective cohort study from a prospective registry was conducted. All patients undergoing elective, degenerative PCLF from December 2010 to June 2018 were included. Patients were divided into a UIV of C2 versus C3/4. Groups were 2:1 propensity matched for fusion extending to the thoracic spine. Demographics, operative, perioperative, complications, and 1-year PRO data were collected.Results: One hundred seventeen patients underwent elective PCLF and were successfully propensity matched (39 C2 vs. 78 C3/4). Groups were similar in fusion extending to the thoracic spine (P = 0.588). Expectedly, the C2 group had more levels fused (5.63 ± 1.89) compared with the C3/4 group (4.50 ± 0.91) (P = 0.001). The C2 group had significantly longer operative time (P < 0.001), yet no differences were seen in estimated blood loss (EBL) (P = 0.494) or length of stay (LOS) (P = 0.424). Both groups significantly improved all PROs at 1-year (EQ-5D; NRS-NP/AP; NDI). Both groups had the same percentage of surgical adverse events at 6.8% (P = 1.00). Between C2 screw type, no differences were seen in operative time, EBL, LOS, complications, or PROs.Conclusion: In patients undergoing elective PCLF, those instrumented to C2 had only longer operative times compared with those stopping at C3/4. No differences were seen in EBL, LOS, 1-year PROs, and complications. Type of C2 screw had no impact on outcomes. Besides increased operative time, instrumenting to C2 had no detectable difference on surgical outcomes or adverse event rates.Level of Evidence: 3. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The goal of this study was to compare rates of dysphagia and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) following long-segment (≥ 3 levels) anterior cervical spinal fusion (ACF) and posterior cervical spinal fusion (PCF) at 3 and 12 months postoperatively. PROs were also compared for patients with dysphagia versus those without dysphagia., Methods: A prospectively collected quality improvement database was used to identify patients who had a long-segment cervical spinal fusion. Cohorts were divided into ACF and PCF groups. Eating Assessment Tool-10 scores and PROs were obtained for all patients preoperatively and at 3 and 12 months postoperatively to compare. Multivariate analysis was also performed to evaluate risk factors for dysphagia., Results: A total of 132 patients met the inclusion criteria, 77 of whom had undergone ACF and 55 of whom had undergone PCF. Dysphagia rates between ACF and PCF cohorts were similar at baseline (13.0% vs 18.2%, p = 0.4). New-onset dysphagia rates were also comparable at 3-month follow-up (39.7% vs 23.1%, p = 0.08) and 12-month follow-up (32.6% vs 32.4%, p > 0.99). Patients who underwent PCF had worse Neck Disability Index (NDI) scores at 3 months than did patients with ACF (13.67 ± 9.49 vs 10.55 ± 6.24, respectively; p = 0.03). There were significantly higher NDI scores for patients with dysphagia at 3 months in both the ACF and PCF groups and at 12 months for those in the PCF group. Analogously, EuroQol-5 Dimensions scores were worse for patients with dysphagia; however, this was only significant for patients in the ACF group at 3 months. There were no significant risk factors for the development of dysphagia found on multivariate analysis., Conclusions: Similar rates and severity of dysphagia were seen following ACF and PCF at 3- and 12-month follow-up. This suggests that long-term dysphagia following cervical fusion surgery may be due to structural changes from the fusion rather than the surgical approach. However, the ACF cohort was significantly younger, and this may have partially accounted for the findings. PROs were also compared for patients with and without dysphagia, demonstrating worsened outcomes in some domains for patients who presented with dysphagia at 3- and 12-month follow-up. This suggests that dysphagia may be associated with a decreased quality of life after cervical fusion.

Mucus plug obstruction is a common complication in prone patients associated with loss of ventilation and hemodynamic instability. This case presents a 62-year-old female with chronic bronchitis who underwent posterior cervical fusion for a type III dens fracture with extension into the pars articularis and pedicles. Glycopyrrolate was administered to assist with fiberoptic intubation. After successful intubation, bronchoscopy revealed copious endotracheal secretions requiring preoperative therapeutic removal. Despite extensive removal of thick endotracheal secretions preoperatively, obstructive mucus plugging developed intraoperatively with complete loss of end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO 2 ) while the patient was in Mayfield head pins. With limited airway access, suctioning and prone flexible bronchoscopy were performed, successfully restoring ETCO 2 . This experience underscores the need for heightened awareness and preparedness for mucus plug obstruction in chronic bronchitis patients undergoing prone cervical spine surgeries., Competing Interests: Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work., (Copyright © 2024, Veligandla et al.)

The posterior ligamentous complex plays a pivotal role in spinal stability during complex movements, especially at the cervical vertebral level. Its disruption leads to the development of post-laminectomy kyphosis. The present case emphasizes the challenges in managing post-laminectomy kyphosis, restoring spinal alignment, and the importance of the posterior tension band as a spine stabilizer. A 19-year-old male underwent C2-C5 laminectomy for cervical C3 neurofibroma at an outside hospital. The patient remained stable for five months and then developed cervical kyphosis, leading to myelopathy. Clinical examination revealed significant neurological deficits, including spasticity, clonus, loss of hand dexterity, and sensory abnormalities. Imaging revealed C3 retrolisthesis with severe cervical kyphosis, cord compression, and myelomalacia. The management involved cervical traction with gradual increments in the weight and correction of the cervical sagittal balance. Principles of kyphotic deformity correction were applied, and C2 pedicle with C3-C5 lateral mass fixation was performed. The patient's modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association score improved from 10 to 16 at six months' follow-up. Post-laminectomy, the disruption of the posterior ligamentous complex increases the range of motion, particularly in the cervical spine, leading to instability and kyphosis. Surgical interventions such as laminoplasty, laminotomy, and laminectomy with posterior cervical fusion aim to mitigate the risk of kyphosis, with techniques such as bone-to-bone ligament-preserving laminoplasty and ultrasonic bone scalpel showing promise in further reducing the risk of kyphosis. The key determinant for the prevention of kyphosis is the integrity of the posterior ligamentous complex. The management of cervical kyphosis includes appropriate pre-operative planning, which includes the evaluation of cervical and spinopelvic parameters. For a posterior spinal approach, one may choose to consider laminotomy, laminoplasty, or laminectomy along with posterior cervical fusion., Competing Interests: Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work., (Copyright © 2024, Mittal et al.)

Study Design: Retrospective analysis.Objective: To compare perioperative outcomes and hospitalization costs between patients undergoing primary or revision posterior cervical discectomy and fusion (PCDF).Summary Of Background Data: While prior studies found differences in outcomes between primary and revision anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), risk, and outcome profiles for posterior cervical revision procedures have not yet been elucidated.Methods: Institutional records were queried for cases involving isolated PCDF procedures to evaluate preoperative characteristics and outcomes for patients undergoing primary versus revision PCDF between 2008 and 2016. The primary outcome was perioperative complications, while perioperative and resource utilization measures such as hospitalization length, required stay in the intensive care unit (ICU), direct hospitalization costs, and 30-day emergency department (ED) admissions were explored as secondary outcomes.Results: One thousand one hundred twenty four patients underwent PCDF, with 218 (19.4%) undergoing a revision procedure. Patients undergoing revision procedures were younger (53.0 vs. 60.5 yrs), but had higher Elixhauser scores compared with the non-revision cohort. Revision cases tended to involve fewer spinal segments (3.6 vs. 4.1 segments) and shorter surgical durations (179.3 vs. 206.3 min), without significant differences in estimated blood loss. There were no significant differences in the overall complication rates (P = 0.20), however, the primary cohort had greater rates of required ICU stays (P = 0.0005) and non-home discharges (P = 0.0003). The revision cohort did experience significantly increased odds of 30-day ED admission (P = 0.04) and had higher direct hospitalization (P = 0.03) and surgical (P < 0.0001) costs.Conclusion: Complication rates, including incidental durotomy, were similar between primary and revision PCDF cohorts. Although prior surgery status did not predict complication risk, comorbidity burden did. Nevertheless, patients undergoing revision procedures had decreased risk of required ICU stay but greater risk of 30-day ED admission and higher direct hospitalization and surgical costs.Level of Evidence: 3. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a multifaceted strategy, involving all phases of surgical care, intended to mitigate the stress response of surgery and optimize patient outcomes. A growing number of publications have demonstrated the benefits of ERAS protocols in specific populations of spine surgery patients. ERAS protocols have yet to be studied in patients undergoing posterior cervical decompression and fusion (PCDF) surgery. In this study, we compared the length of stay (LOS) and discharge disposition between two groups of patients that had PCDF surgery for degenerative pathologies. The pre-ERAS group consisted of 74 patients that had surgery between 2012 and 2017. The post-ERAS group included 25 patients that had surgery between 2017 and 2019. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of age, gender, and diagnosis (p greater than 0.05). The post-ERAS group had statistically non-significant, positive trends for LOS and discharge disposition. Implementation of an ERAS protocol for PCDF patients is feasible, however, future studies are needed to refine ERAS protocols and confirm the benefits.

Computer-assisted navigation (CAN) has been shown to improve accuracy of screw placement in procedures involving the posterior cervical spine, but whether the addition of CAN affects complication rates, neurologic or otherwise, is presently unknown. The objective of this study is to determine the effect of spinal CAN on short-term clinical outcomes following posterior cervical fusion. The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried from 2011 to 2018. Patients receiving posterior cervical fusion were identified and separated into CAN and non-CAN cohorts on the basis of a propensity score matching algorithm to select similar patients for comparison. Rates of 30-day unplanned readmission, reoperation, and other complications were evaluated. A separate matching algorithm was used to generate a subgroup of patients undergoing C1-C2 or occiput-C2 fusion for comparison of the same outcomes. A total of 12,578 patients met inclusion criteria, of which 689 received CAN and 11,889 did not. After adjusting for baseline differences, patients receiving CAN experienced longer operations and had higher total relative value units associated with care. There were no significant differences in 30-day complication, readmission, or revision rates. At the occipitocervical junction, there were more hardware revisions in the non-CAN group, but this effect did not reach statistical significance (2 vs. 0; P = 0.155). Surgeons should embrace navigation in the cervical spine at their own discretion, as use of CAN does not appear to be associated with increased rates of surgical complications or readmissions despite longer operative time. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective This retrospective cohort study seeks to identify risk factors associated with complications following posterior cervical laminectomy and fusion (PCLF) surgery. Methods Adults undergoing PCLF from 2012 through 2018 at a single center were identified. Demographic and radiographic data, surgical characteristics, and complication rates were compared. Multivariate logistic regression models identified independent predictors of complications following surgery. Results A total of 196 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in the study. The medical, surgical, and overall complication rates were 10.2%, 23.0%, and 29.1% respectively. Risk factors associated with medical complications in multivariate analysis included impaired ambulation status (odds ratio [OR], 2.27; p=0.02) and estimated blood loss over 500 mL (OR, 3.67; p=0.02). Multivariate analysis revealed preoperative narcotic use (OR, 2.43; p=0.02) and operative time (OR, 1.005; p=0.03) as risk factors for surgical complication, whereas antidepressant use was a protective factor (OR, 0.21; p=0.01). Overall complication was associated with preoperative narcotic use (OR, 1.97; p=0.04) and higher intraoperative blood loss (OR, 1.0007; p=0.03). Conclusion Preoperative narcotic use and estimated blood loss predicted the incidence of complications following PCLF for CSM. Ambulation status was a significant predictor of the development of a medical complication specifically. These results may help surgeons in counseling patients who may be at increased risk of complication following surgery.

Study Design: Retrospective comparative study.Objective: The aim of this study was to compare cervical sagittal alignment after posterior fusion surgery with lateral mass screw (LMS) and cervical pedicle screw (CPS) fixation.Summary Of Background Data: LMS fixation in the subaxial cervical spine has become the preferred method of posterior cervical fusion. Although CPS has biomechanical benefits, it also has neurovascular risks. Few studies to date have compared sagittal alignment changes after posterior cervical fusion using CPS and LMS fixation.Methods: From 2006 to 2017, 71 consecutive patients underwent posterior cervical fusion using CPS (n = 51) or LMS (n = 20) fixation. Patients who underwent fusion with both types of screws and those who planned to undergo additional anterior fusion surgery were excluded. The minimum follow-up period was 12 months. C2-C7 Cobb angle for cervical lordosis (CL), fusion segmental angle (SA), C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA), and T1 slope (T1S) were measured.Results: Immediate postoperative SA and SVA differed significantly in patients who underwent CPS and LMS fixation. SA changes were more substantial after CPS fixation, with a significant difference maintained until final follow-up. Over time, CL, SVA, and T1S tended to return to their preoperative states regardless of screw type. Two patients who underwent LMS fixation, but none who underwent CPS fixation, required unplanned or additional anterior fusion surgery for revision.Conclusion: The present study is the first radiologic comparison of LMS and CPS fixation after posterior-only fusion surgery. CPS resulted in more reliable and well-preserved SA correction, whereas CL and SVA did not differ between the two groups over time due to loss of correction.Level of Evidence: 4. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design: Retrospective.Objective: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of posterior cervical fusion lowest instrumented vertebra (PCF LIV) selection on incidence of mechanical failure, revision surgery, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs).Summary Of Background Data: Recent studies indicate that the LIV in PCF may contribute to the risk of mechanical failure. To date, the evidence available to guide spine surgeons in the selection of PCF LIV remains limited.Methods: All patients undergoing PCF at a single institution were prospectively entered into a spine registry which was retrospectively queried. Data collection included demographics, pathology, operative variables, construct LIV, outcomes of mechanical failure, revision surgery, and patient-reported disability, pain, and quality of life.Results: Of 438 patients undergoing PCF from 2006 to 2019, 106 patients had an LIV of C7, T1, or T2, a minimum of 1-year follow-up, and met all study inclusion criteria. LIV cohorts were C7 LIV (36), T1 LIV (42), and T2 LIV (28). There were no between-group differences in patient demographics, operative variables, or postoperative follow-up across the three LIV cohorts. Mechanical failure rates for C7, T1, and T2 LIV were 30.6%, 23.8%, and 0%, respectively (P = 0.007). Revision rates for C7, T1, and T2 LIV were 25.0%, 11.9%, and 0%, respectively (P = 0.013). No difference was noted in average time to revision/failure between C7 (39.68 months) and T1 (29.85 months) LIV cohorts. No differences in baseline, 3-month, and 12-month postoperative PRO measures were noted in the C7 and T1 LIV cohort when compared to the T2 LIV cohort.Conclusion: The findings in this study indicate that PCF LIV selection may play a significant role in the development of mechanical complications and need for revision surgery. T2 LIV selection demonstrated a significantly lower rate of mechanical failure and revision surgery. Postoperative PROs up to 36 months are needed to evaluate effect of LIV selection on PROs.Level of Evidence: 3. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Context: Despite a number of studies addressing the anatomical and biomechanical challenges of long segment, posterior cervical fusion surgery, recommendations for appropriate caudal "end level" vary widely.Purpose: Compare revision rates, patient reported outcomes and radiographic outcomes in patients in whom 3+ level posterior fusions ended in the cervical spine versus those in whom the fusion was extended into the thoracic spine.Study Design: Multicenter retrospective analysis.Outcome Measures: Visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), cervical lordosis, C2-C7 sagittal plumbline, T1 slope, and revision rate.Methods: We assembled a radiographic and clinical database of patients that had undergone three or more level posterior cervical fusions for degenerative disease from January 2013 to May 2015 at one of four busy spine centers. Only those patients with at least 2 years of postoperative (postop) follow-up were included. Patients were divided into two groups: group I (fusion ending at C6 or C7) and group II (fusion extending into the thoracic spine). All radiographic measurements (cervical lordosis, T1 slope, and C2-C7 sagittal plumbline) were performed by an independent experienced clinical researcher.Results: Two hundred and sixty-four patient cases were reviewed and sorted into the two outlined groups, Group I (n=168) and Group II (n=96). Demographically, mean age, percentage of females, non-smokers and anterior support were greater in Group II than in Groups I (p<.05). Mean estimated blood loss (EBL), operative time (OR) and length of hospital stay (LOS) were significantly higher in Group II (p<.05). Rate of revision was not clinically or statistically significantly different (p>.05) between Group I (11.1%) and Group II (9.4%). The majority of the revision surgeries occurred between 2 to 5 years postop. A greater number of subjacent degeneration/spondylolisthesis events were noted in Group I compared with Group II (3.6% vs. 1.2%). There were significant improvements in mean clinical outcomes (ie, VAS and ODI) at two years postop in both groups, but there were no statistically significant differences between the groups (p>.05). Mean cervical lordosis at 2 years postop improved in all groups (12.8° vs. 14.1°); however, there was no significant statistical difference in change for mean cervical lordosis (2 weeks vs. 2 year postop) between the two groups. Similary, there were no significant statistical differences in change for mean C2-C7 sagittal plumbline and T1 slope (2 weeks vs. 2 year postop) between the two groups(p>.05).Conclusions: Caudal end level did not significantly affect revision rates, patient reported outcomes or radiographic outcomes. Higher EBL, OR, and LOS in group II suggest that, absent focal C7-T1 pathology, extension of posterior cervical fusions into the thoracic spine may not be necessary. Extension of posterior cervical fusions into the thoracic spine may be recommended for higher risk patients with limitations to strong C7 bone anchorage. In others, it is safe to stop at C7. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The objective was to describe the indications, technique, and initial outcomes of autologous rib graft with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein (rhBMP) in pediatric patients undergoing posterior cervical fusion., Methods: A retrospective study was performed of all pediatric patients who underwent autologous rib grafting with extra-small rhBMP-2 for posterior craniocervical or cervical arthrodesis at a single institution between May 2020 and July 2023. Patients with less than 3 months of postoperative follow-up and no postoperative CT data were excluded. Primary outcomes included presence of fusion on CT, 30-day perioperative complications, and rib harvest complications., Results: Twenty-eight sequential patients met inclusion criteria. Thirteen were male, 15 were female, and the average age was 9 years. There were no surgical site infections or instances of postoperative seroma or unplanned return to the operating room. All patients had solid fusion on postoperative CT at 3 months. The average follow-up was 14.5 months, with a range of 4 months to 3 years. There were no complications associated with the rib harvest, including no instances of harvest site pain, and all patient incisions healed well., Conclusions: The authors' preliminary results demonstrate that autologous rib graft with extra-small rhBMP-2 is an effective strategy to achieve a high rate of fusion in pediatric patients undergoing posterior instrumented craniocervical or cervical fusion. In this series, the authors found an acceptable safety profile, without seroma, surgical site infection, unplanned return to the operating room, or rib harvest complications.

Objective: Use of bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)-an osteoinductive agent commonly used in lumbar arthrodesis-is off-label for cervical arthrodesis. This study aimed to identify the effect of BMP use on clinical and radiological outcomes in instrumented cervical arthrodesis., Methods: A comprehensive systematic review of the literature was performed to identify studies directly comparing outcomes between cervical arthrodeses with and without using BMP. Outcomes were analyzed separately for cases of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and posterior cervical fusion (PCF)., Results: A total of 20 studies with 5828 patients (1948 with BMP and 3880 without BMP) were included. In the ACDF cases, BMP use was associated with higher fusion rates (98.9% vs 93.6%, risk difference [RD] 8%; risk ratio [RR] 1.12, p = 0.02), lower reoperation rates (2.2% vs 3.1%, RD 3%; RR 0.48, p = 0.04), and higher risk of dysphagia (24.7% vs 8.1%, RD 11%; RR 1.93, p = 0.02). No significant differences in the Neck Disability Index, neck pain, or arm pain scores were associated with the use of BMP. On subgroup meta-analysis of ACDF cases, older age (≥ 50 years) and higher BMP dose (≥ 0.9 mg/level) were associated with significantly higher fusion rates and relatively lower risk for dysphagia, whereas arthrodesis of fewer segments (< 2 levels) showed significantly higher dysphagia rates without a significant increase in fusion rates. In the PCF cases, the use of BMP was not associated with significant differences in fusion (p = 0.38) or reoperation (p = 0.61) rates but was associated with significantly higher blood loss during surgery (mean difference 146.7 ml, p ≤ 0.01)., Conclusions: Use of BMP in ACDF offers higher rates of augmented fusion and lower rates of all-cause reoperation but with an increased risk of dysphagia. The benefit of fusion outweighs the risk of dysphagia with a higher BMP dose in older patients being operated on for < 2 levels. The use of BMP in PCF seems to have a less important effect on clinical and radiological outcomes.

Objective: Postoperative length of stay (LOS) significantly contributes to healthcare costs and resource utilization. The primary goal of this study was to identify patient, clinical, surgical, and institutional variables that influence LOS after elective surgery for degenerative conditions of the cervical spine. The secondary objectives were to examine the variability in LOS and institutional practices used to decrease LOS., Methods: This was a multicenter observational retrospective cohort study of patients enrolled in the Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network (CSORN) between January 2015 and October 2020 who underwent elective anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) (1-3 levels) or posterior cervical fusion (PCF) (between C2 and T2) with/without decompression for degenerative conditions of the cervical spine. Prolonged LOS was defined as LOS greater than the median for the ACDF and PCF populations. The principal investigators at each participating CSORN healthcare institution completed a survey to capture institutional practices implemented to reduce postoperative LOS., Results: In total, 1228 patients were included (729 ACDF and 499 PCF patients). The median (IQR) LOS for ACDF and PCF were 1.0 (1.0) day and 5.0 (4.0) days, respectively. Predictors of prolonged LOS after ACDF were female sex, myelopathy diagnosis, lower baseline SF-12 mental component summary score, multilevel ACDF, and perioperative adverse events (AEs) (p < 0.05). Predictors of prolonged LOS after PCF were nonsmoking status, education less than high school, lower baseline numeric rating scale score for neck pain and EQ5D score, higher baseline Neck Disability Index score, and perioperative AEs (p < 0.05). Myelopathy did not significantly predict prolonged LOS within the PCF cohort after multivariate analysis. Of the 8 institutions (57.1%) with an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol or standardized protocol, only 3 reported using an ERAS protocol specific to patients undergoing ACDF or PCF., Conclusions: Patient and clinical factors predictive of prolonged LOS after ACDF and PCF are highly variable, warranting individual consideration for possible mitigation. Perioperative AEs remained a consistent independent predictor of prolonged LOS in both cohorts, highlighting the importance of preventing intra- and postoperative complications.