Search

Patellofemoral pain (PFP) has poor long-term recovery outcomes. Central sensitization describes central nervous system changes altering pain modulation, which can complicate recovery (poorer prognosis and worse function). Signs of central sensitization include amplified pain facilitation, pain hypersensitivity, and impaired pain inhibition, which can be measured with temporal summation of pain (TSP), pressure pain thresholds (PPTs), and conditioned pain modulation (CPM), respectively. Sex differences exist for these test responses, but female-only PFP investigations of sensitization are uncommon. Understanding pain modulation in females with PFP could improve treatment protocols. To determine whether females with PFP exhibit signs of central sensitization (greater TSP, lower PPTs, and reduced CPM) compared with pain-free females. Cross-sectional study. Laboratory. Thirty-three females ([20 PFP, 13 pain free]; age: PFP 29.2 ± 7 years, pain free 28 ± 7 years; height: PFP 166.7 ± 5.9 cm, pain free 166 ± 9.5 cm; mass: PFP 66.7 ± 9.6 kg, pain free 69.3 ± 7.5 kg). Temporal summation of pain was assessed with 10 punctate stimuli applied to the knee and calculated by the difference in pain intensity between beginning and end responses. Pressure pain thresholds were tested at 4 sites (3 for local hypersensitivity [knee] and 1 for widespread hypersensitivity [hand]). Conditioned pain modulation was conducted by comparing PPTs during 2 conditions (baseline and ice immersion). Conditioned pain modulation response was defined as the percent difference between conditions. Between-groups differences in TSP response were analyzed with a Welch test. Separate Welch tests analyzed group comparisons of PPTs and CPM responses at 4 sites. Females with PFP exhibited greater TSP response (P =.019) and lower CPM response at patella center (P =.010) and hand sites (P =.007) than pain-free females. Pressure pain thresholds group differences were not observed at any site (P >.0125). Females with PFP modulate pain differently than pain-free females. Clinicians should recognize signs of central sensitization and their potential effect on treatment options. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Achilles tendinopathy is a common overuse condition that can become persistent despite conservative treatment. Sensitization of both the peripheral and central nervous systems may contribute to the persistent pain. Both exercise and electrical stimulation have the potential to modulate the nervous system's sensitivity to painful stimuli. Hypothesis/Purpose: The purpose of this study was to describe the changes in pain sensitivity and self-reported function in runners with chronic Achilles tendon pain following sequential treatment with noxious electrical stimulation (NxES) and eccentric plantarflexion exercise. Study Design: Single group, repeated measures design. Methods: Sixteen participants with chronic Achilles tendinopathy completed the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) and the Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment-Achilles scale (VISA-A) and quantitative sensory tests (pressure pain threshold, heat temporal summation, and heat pain threshold) at baseline, one week, seven weeks, and then at a one month post intervention follow-up. The NxES was applied for one week, then followed by plantarflexion eccentric exercise for six weeks. Changes across timepoints were assessed using repeated measures ANOVA and post hoc analysis to describe differences. Hedges g effect sizes were also calculated. Results: There was a significant improvement in LEFS (p < 0.001) and VISA-A (p < 0.001) from baseline to one month follow-up, with a mean change of 9.6 ± 7.7 and 19.4 ± 17.7 points respectively. Pressure pain threshold of the involved Achilles tendon increased over time (p < 0.001) with significant improvements after NxES application (p = 0.002) and after six weeks of eccentric exercise (p < 0.001). There were significant improvements from baseline to one month follow-up for heat temporal summation (p = 0.001) and heat pain threshold (p < 0.001). Conclusions: For individuals with chronic Achilles tendinopathy, a sequential treatment of NxES followed by eccentric exercise resulted in a clinically significant improvement in self-reported pain and function. During the first week of treatment there was a reduction in mechanical hyperalgesia during the NxES-only phase, while a large reduction in primary heat hyperalgesia and additional desensitization to mechanical pain occurred during the eccentric training phase of treatment. Level of Evidence: 2b [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The home quantitative sensory testing tool-kit presented may help to provide tools for future research requiring cost-effective sensory testing that can be offered through telehealth. Quantitative sensory testing (QST) is a set of methods for quantifying somatosensory functioning. Limitations of laboratory-based QST (LQST) include high cost, complexity in training, lack of portability, and time requirements for testing. Translating QST to a home setting could facilitate future research and clinical care. The objective of this study was to develop a home QST (HQST) tool-kit that is cost-effective, easy to use, and detects changes in sensory and pain processing. Thirty-two young healthy adults underwent sensory testing on their nondominant forearm using standard in-person LQST, followed by "simulated HQST" using video guidance in a separate room from the investigator before and after application of either a lidocaine or capsaicin cream. We observed good agreement between HQST and LQST scores, with significant correlations observed between the pinprick, pressure, cold and heat measures (|ρ| range = 0.36-0.54). The participants rated the HQST protocol as highly acceptable and safe but can be improved in future implementations. Home QST was able to detect hypoesthesia to vibration after lidocaine cream application (P = 0.024, d = 0.502) and could detect hypoalgesia and hyperalgesia to pressure and heat pain sensitivity tests after application of lidocaine and capsaicin creams, respectively (P -value range = <0.001-0.036, d -value range = 0.563-0.901). Despite limitations, HQST tool-kits may become a cost-effective, convenient, and scalable approach for improving sensory profiling in clinical care and clinical research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: This study aimed to assess subclinical peripheral diabetic neuropathy (PDN) in adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). Methods: Subjects included 53 T1DM patients (age (mean ± SE): 15.8 ± 0.54 years, disease duration: 6.0 ± 0.51 years and HbA1c: 7.9 ± 0.19%), and 37 healthy gender matched controls (age: 15.6 ± 0.52 years). PDN was assessed by vibration perception threshold (VPT) and by quantitative sensory testing (QST). In controls, 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Results: Among patients, VPT prevalence of abnormality ranged from 60–73.4% on different sites. Higher VPT was found in patients on all examined sites (p < 0.01). In controls, VPT correlated with height (r = 0.48, p = 0.05). Regarding QST prevalence of abnormality, cold detection threshold (CDT) ranged 7.3–39.0%, cold pain threshold (CPT) ranged 22.22–29.63%, hot detection threshold (HDT) ranged 34.14–63.41%, and hot pain threshold (HPT) ranged 15.79–36.84%. In patients, CPT correlated with BMI (r = 0.42, p = 0.05) and diabetes duration, (r = 0.40, p = 0.05), HPT correlated with age (r = 0.36, p = 0.05) and height (r = 0.35, p = 0.05), while in controls with BMI (r = 0.51, p = 0.05). No correlation of VPT or QST with HbA1c was observed. Conclusion: Adolescents with T1DM in this study, although asymptomatic, showed a high prevalence of impaired indices of PDN, highlighting potential clinical implications of early identification of PDN. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis (hATTR) is a rare autosomal dominant disease with high clinical variability, influenced by both genotype and the geographic origins of carriers. There is a limited understanding of the Val142Ile and Ser43Asn recognised mutations in Ecuador and Colombia. Therefore, the objective of this study is to describe the neurological and functional characteristics of patients with hATTR associated with the Val142Ile and Ser43Asn mutations, as well as to identify possible differentiating factors between the two mutations. Methods This cross-sectional, multicenter study included 35 hATTR patients from rehabilitation centers in Ecuador and Colombia. Patients had confirmed Val142Ile or Ser43Asn mutations. Neurological and functional assessments included the Neurological Impairment Scale, Norfolk Quality of Life-Diabetic Neuropathy (QOL-DN), Composite Autonomic Symptom Score-31, and various motor function tests as nine-hole peg test (NHP). Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) evaluating small fiber function, while ultrasound measured the cross-sectional area (CSA) of peripheral nerves. Statistical analysis employed nonparametric tests and random forest classifiers, using SHAP values to identify differentiating variables. Results Val142Ile carriers showed lower performance in the right NHP test and greater sensitivity to cold pain in hand and leg. Ultrasound revealed increased CSA of the median nerve at the elbow and arm and the ulnar nerve at the arm in Val142Ile carriers compared to Ser43Asn carriers. The final random forest model identified the NHP test, Norfolk QOL-DN score, and CSA of the median and ulnar nerves as key discriminating variables. Conclusion This study identified significant neurophysiological and ultrasound markers differentiating Val142Ile and Ser43Asn mutations in hATTR-PN patients. Increased nerve CSA and specific motor and sensory impairments highlight the need for comprehensive evaluations to guide diagnosis and treatment.

Abstract Background Pain, the primary complaint in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), is multifaceted, and may be driven by inflammatory disease activity and central sensitisation. We aimed to ascertain what proportion of RA pain severity is explained by markers of inflammation and quantitative sensory testing (QST) indices of central sensitisation. Methods This was a cross-sectional analysis of data from individuals with clinically active RA. Pain severity was assessed using numerical rating scales and inflammation via 28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28) and Ultrasound (Greyscale, Power Doppler). Pain sensitivity was assessed by ‘static’ (tibialis anterior or brachioradialis pressure pain detection threshold-PPT-TA/PPT-BR) and ‘dynamic’ (temporal summation-TS, conditioned pain modulation-CPM) QST. Bivariate associations used Spearman’s correlation coefficients, and multivariable linear regression models determined relative contributions to pain severity. Results In bivariate analyses of N = 96 (age 65 ± 10y, 77% females) people with RA, pain severity was significantly associated with inflammation indices (r = 0.20 to 0.55), and CPM (r=-0.26). In multivariable models that included TS, CPM, age, sex, and body mass index, inflammation indices remained significantly associated with pain severity. Multivariable models explained 22 to 27% of pain variance. Heterogeneity was apparent for associations with pain between subscores for pain now, strongest or average over the past 4-weeks. Conclusions In individuals with clinically active RA, markers of inflammatory disease activity best explain RA pain with only marginal contributions from QST indices of central sensitisation. Although inflammation plays a key role in the experience of RA pain, the greater proportion of pain severity remains unexplained by DAS28 and ultrasound indices of inflammation.

Introduction: Painful idiopathic distal sensory polyneuropathy (IDSP) and fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) are cryptogenic chronic pain syndromes. The contribution of small fibre pathology (SFP) in FMS remains controversial. This study aims to quantify small nerve pathology in participants with IDSP and FMS and identify relationships of SFP with sensory phenotypes. Methods: In this study, 73 individuals (FMS: 25, IDSP: 23, healthy volunteers: 25) underwent comprehensive assessment, including neurological exams, questionnaires, sensory tests, and corneal confocal microscopy. Results: IDSP participants displayed lower wind-up ratio (WUR) relative to FMS (p < 0.001), loss of function to thermal and mechanical stimuli and elevated neuropathy disability scores compared to FMS and healthy volunteers (all p < 0.001). FMS participants demonstrated gain of function to heat and blunt pressure pain responses relative to IDSP, and healthy volunteers (heat: p = 0.002 and p = 0.003; pressure: both p < 0.001) and WUR (both p < 0.001). FMS participants exhibited reduced corneal nerve fibre density (p = 0.02), while IDSP participants had lower global corneal nerve measures (density, branch density, and length) relative to healthy volunteers (all p < 0.001). Utilising corneal nerve fibre length, SFP was demonstrated in 66.6% of participants (FMS: 13/25; IDSP: 22/23). Conclusion: Participants with SFP, in both FMS and IDSP, reported symptoms indicative of small nerve fibre disease. Although distinctions in pain distributions are evident between individuals with FMS and IDSP, over 50% of participants between the two conditions displayed both a loss and gain of thermal and mechanical function suggestive of shared mechanisms. However, sensory phenotypes were associated with the presence of SFP in IDSP but not in FMS. Plain Language Summary: In people with painful idiopathic neuropathy (pain related to nerve damage where the cause of nerve damage is unknown), fibromyalgia syndrome (a long-term condition causing widespread pain), and healthy volunteers, the small nerve fibres of the peripheral nervous system, which may be involved in generating pain were assessed. These nerve fibres can be measured at the front of the eye (cornea) which can provide details on whether they are damaged in the body. The response to temperature, light touch, pressure and pinprick stimuli can also be used to determine if there is a loss or gain of sensation, which may contribute to pain. The aim of this study was to identify the degree of damage to these nerve fibres and to determine whether this damage is associated with a loss (cannot feel or requires more intense stimulus to feel) or gain (stimulus is felt earlier or is painful earlier at lower intensity) of sensory function. The pattern of loss or gain in sensory function is known as a sensory phenotype. It was found that people with painful idiopathic neuropathy had more severe nerve damage, loss of function to temperature and touch, and fewer small nerve fibres in the cornea compared to those with fibromyalgia syndrome and healthy volunteers. People with fibromyalgia syndrome were more sensitive to heat and pressure and had fewer corneal nerve fibres relative to healthy volunteers. The presence of corneal nerve fibre damage was associated with sensory phenotypes (types of sensation felt) in painful idiopathic neuropathy but not in fibromyalgia syndrome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pruritus in peripheral neuropathy is associated with small-fiber dysfunction and pathology and impacts on depression and anxiety levels. Pruritus often escapes physicians' attention in patients with peripheral neuropathy (PNP). Here we aimed to characterize neuropathic pruritus in a cohort of 191 patients with PNP (large, mixed, or small fiber) and 57 control subjects with deep phenotyping in a multicenter cross-sectional observational study at 3 German sites. All participants underwent thorough neurological examination, nerve conduction studies, quantitative sensory testing, and skin biopsies to assess intraepidermal nerve fiber density. Patients filled in a set of questionnaires assessing the characteristics of pruritus and pain, the presence of depression and anxiety, and quality of life. Based on the severity of pruritus and pain, patients were grouped into 4 groups: "pruritus," "pain," "pruritus and pain," and "no pruritus/no pain." Although 11% (21/191) of patients reported pruritus as their only symptom, further 34.6% (66/191) reported pruritus and pain. Patients with pain (with or without pruritus) were more affected by anxiety, depression, and reduced quality of life than control subjects. Patients with pruritus (with and without pain) had increases in cold detection threshold, showing Aδ-fiber dysfunction. The pruritus group had lower intraepidermal nerve fiber density at the thigh, concomitant with a more proximal distribution of symptoms compared with the other PNP groups. Stratification of patients with PNP by using cross-sectional datasets and multinominal logistic regression analysis revealed distinct patterns for the patient groups. Together, our study sheds light on the presence of neuropathic pruritus in patients with PNP and its relationship with neuropathic pain, outlines the sensory and structural abnormalities associated with neuropathic pruritus, and highlights its impact on anxiety levels. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction/Aims: Limitations exist in evaluating mechanical detection thresholds (MDTs) due to a lack of dependable electronic instruments designed to assess Aβ fibers and measure MDTs across different body areas. This study aims to evaluate the test–retest and inter‐rater reliability of the cutaneous mechanical stimulator (CMS), an electronic tactile stimulator, in quantifying MDTs. Methods: Using a test–retest design, participants underwent assessments of MDTs using Semmes–Weinstein monofilaments (SWM) and the CMS. This study included 27 healthy volunteers (mean age 24.07 ± 3.76 years). Two raters assessed MDTs using SWM and the CMS at two stimulation sites (the left hand and foot) in two experimental sessions approximately 2 weeks apart. Results: MDTs using SWM and the CMS showed excellent reliability on the hand (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] =.84) and foot (ICC =.90). A comparison of results obtained at the two sessions showed that MDTs on the hand displayed good reliability for both SWM (ICC =.63) and the CMS (ICC =.73), whereas MDTs on the foot displayed fair reliability for SWM (ICC =.50) and the CMS (ICC =.42). MDTs exhibited good inter‐rater reliability with SWM (ICC =.66) and excellent inter‐rater reliability with the CMS (ICC =.82) on the hand, as well as showing fair inter‐rater reliability with SWM (ICC =.53) and good inter‐rater reliability with the CMS (ICC =.60) on the foot. Discussion: The CMS showed superior inter‐rater reliability, indicating its potential as a valuable tool for assessing tactile sensitivity in research and clinical settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective This study examined the role of central sensitization in the experience of pain among adolescents and young adults with the most severe genotypes of sickle cell disease (SCD). We hypothesized that adolescents and young adults with chronic SCD pain would demonstrate a higher perceptual response to repeated stimulation of identical intensity (i.e. temporal summation of pain, TSP) compared to counterparts with infrequent pain. We also examined psychological risk factors that can impact pain sensitivity. Methods Patients ages 12–21 years, diagnosed with SCD type Hb SS or Hb S Beta0Thalasemia, who reported infrequent pain (≤2 pain days/month; n  = 25) or met AAPT criteria for chronic SCD pain (n  = 25) were enrolled. Patients were age- and sex-matched, with similar proportions receiving chronic blood transfusion and hydroxyurea. Patients completed static quantitative sensory testing (QST) and dynamic TSP testing to assess pain sensitivity. Patients and a caregiver completed demographic and psychological measures (depression, anxiety, pain interference, pain catastrophizing). Results Simple slope analysis revealed differentially elevated heat TSP among adolescents and young adults with chronic SCD pain (b  = 3.14, p  = .002) but not those with infrequent pain (b  = 0.45, p  = .61). Faster habituation was further observed for those with chronic compared to infrequent pain. Adolescents and young adults with chronic pain reported more frequent depression, anxiety, and pain interference symptoms; however, psychological symptoms and pain catastrophizing were not associated with QST or TSP (p s >.17). Conclusion Current results demonstrate that a well-established, prognostic, QST risk marker (i.e. TSP) may distinguish chronic from infrequent pain subgroups of adolescents and young adults with SCD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Objectives: Variability in biopsychosocial factors can explain the interindividual variability in pain. One factor that can impact pain is the pain catastrophizing level. Interestingly, parental pain catastrophizing is related to the severity of the clinical pain of their children. This study explored whether parental pain catastrophizing is also associated with their children's experimental pain sensitivity. Methods: Forty-five healthy girls (mean age 12.07 ± 1.47 years) and one of their parents participated in this study. Parents completed the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) about their child's pain (PCS-Parentchild) as well as their pain (PCS-Parent). Children completed the PCS about their pain (PCS-Child) and the Pubertal Developmental Scale (PDS). Children underwent psychophysical tests, including paradigms of temporal summation, heat- and pressure-conditioned pain modulation, offset analgesia, and cold pain tolerance. Correlations and regression models were conducted to assess the relationships between parental pain catastrophizing scales (separately for PCS-Parentchild and PCS-Parent) and experimental pain sensitivity with and without controlling for PCS-Child and PDS. T-tests were used to compare pain sensitivity between participants with vs. without a family history of psychiatric disorder. Results: No significant relationships were found between the experimental pain sensitivity measures and either PCS-Parentchild or PCS-Parent with and without controlling for PCS-Child and PDS. No differences were found in experimental pain sensitivity between participants with and without a family history of psychiatric disorder. Conclusions: Parental pain catastrophizing may contribute minimally to the individual variability in experimental pain sensitivity of healthy adolescent girls. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Objectives: To identify clinical phenotypes of hip osteoarthritis (OA) within a biopsychosocial framework. Methods: A cross-sectional analysis of 143 individuals with hip OA awaiting total hip arthroplasty (THA) was performed. Phenotyping features included sociodemographic and biomedical information, pain-related cognitions and emotions, mental disorders, traumatic experiences, self-efficacy, social support, perceived stress, and somatosensory function. Outcome measures included the hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score and the numeric pain-rating scale. Decision tree learning was used to select the most important phenotyping features. K-means clustering analyses were performed to identify clinical phenotypes and a decision tree algorithm was trained to classify individuals in the identified clinical phenotypes. Results: Selected phenotyping features associated with pain and disability included a combination of biomedical, psychological, and social variables. Two distinct clinical phenotypes were identified. Individuals within the maladaptive phenotype (34%) reported more comorbidities, less self-efficacy and higher levels of anxiety, depression, pain-related fear-avoidance, and feelings of injustice. No differences were found regarding social support and somatosensory function. Regarding the outcome measures, individuals within the maladaptive phenotype reported higher levels of pain and disability. Finally, based on the Fear-Avoidance Components Scale (FACS) and the anxiety subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-A), individuals could be classified into the clinical phenotypes with 87.8% accuracy. Conclusions: Two clinical phenotypes, an adaptive and a maladaptive phenotype, can be identified in individuals with hip OA using the FACS and HADS-A. The identification of these clinical phenotypes represents a crucial step toward precision medicine, enabling the development of targeted treatment pathways tailored to the distinct biomedical and psychological features of each phenotype. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ABSTRACT Aims Protocol and Methods Results Conclusions To investigate the effect of a lingual nerve block on spontaneous pain in patients with burning mouth syndrome (BMS) and to estimate associated somatosensory abnormalities by quantitative sensory testing (QST).A standardised QST battery including cold detection threshold (CDT), warmth detection threshold (WDT), thermal sensory limen (TSL), paradoxical heat sensation (PHS), cold pain threshold (CPT), heat pain threshold (HPT), mechanical pain threshold (MPT), wind‐up ratio (WUR) and pressure pain threshold (PPT) was performed at the oral mucosa of the most painful site and intraoral control site in 20 BMS patients, and at the tongue and cheek mucosa in 22 age‐ and gender‐matched healthy controls. The effect of a lingual nerve block on spontaneous burning pain reported by the BMS patients on a 0–10 cm visual analogue scale (VAS) was investigated in a randomised double‐blind crossover design using (1 mL) lidocaine (lido) or saline (sal) with an interval of 1 week. The BMS patients were grouped into ‘central’ and ‘peripheral’ mechanisms based on the effect of the lingual nerve injections. For each BMS patient, Z‐scores and Loss/Gain scores were computed. Differences among groups and sites were analysed using a two‐way ANOVA. Differences within group were assessed by paired t‐test.The 20 BMS patients were characterised on the basis of VAS changes (ΔLido—ΔSal) as a peripheral BMS subgroup (n = 9) with pain relief more than 1 cm on the VAS and a central BMS subgroup (n = 11) with pain relief less than 1 cm. BMS patients (n = 20) had lower sensitivity to thermal stimuli (i.e., CDT, WDT, TSL, CPT, HPT and PPT) and higher sensitivity to mechanical stimuli (i.e., PPT) compared with controls (p ≤ 0.007). Based on Loss/Gain coding, L1G0 (loss of thermal somatosensory function with no somatosensory gain, 55.0%) was the most frequent coding in the BMS group, which was higher than 11.4% in the control group (p < 0.001). Surprisingly, there was no significant difference between the peripheral and central BMS subgroups with regard to the Z‐scores of any of the nine QST parameters (p > 0.097).The results of the lingual nerve blocks demonstrated two distinct phenotypes with either peripheral or central mechanisms but no direct impact on somatosensory function. Overall, somatosensory function in BMS patients seems abnormal in the painful areas compared to matched controls with a conspicuous loss of thermosensory function. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ABSTRACT Aim Materials and Methods Results Conclusions To evaluate conditioned pain modulation (CPM) in burning mouth syndrome (BMS) patients with different pain mechanisms.Twenty BMS patients (52.0 ± 6.8 years, 17 women and 3 men) and age‐ and gender‐matched 22 healthy controls were enrolled in this randomised controlled trial. The patients received an active lingual nerve block (lidocaine) and a placebo injection (saline) randomly with an interval of 1 week in a double‐blinded manner. Patients evaluated their pain intensity on a 0‐ to 10‐cm visual analogue scale (VAS) before and after each injection, with or without CPM. Based on the anaesthesia effect, BMS patients were divided into two groups with presumed different pain mechanisms; a ‘central subgroup (n = 11)’ with pain relief less than 1 cm and ‘peripheral subgroup (n = 9)’ with pain relief more than 1 cm on the VAS. Mechanical pain threshold (MPT) and wind‐up ratio (WUR) were investigated at two oral mucosa regions: the region with most intense symptoms and a control region for the patient group; tongue and buccal region for the control group. CPM was induced by immersing the left hand into cold water. A moderate level of pain (around five on the VAS) was obtained by adjusting the water temperature. MPT and WUR were measured twice for all the participants with and without CPM, which was analysed and presented as relative change in MPT and WUR. Differences between groups were analysed using two‐way ANOVA. Differences within group between tests were assessed by paired t‐test.At baseline, there were no significant group differences for MPT or WUR between BMS patients and healthy controls (p ≥ 0.156). The mean bath temperature to evoke moderate pain for the BMS group was significantly lower than that for the healthy control group (8.9°C vs. 11.9°C, p = 0.003). The CPM evoked an inhibitory modulation in 18.2%–44.4% of BMS patients, while for the healthy group, the ratio was 68.2%–81.8%. Central BMS patients had smaller CPM effects than healthy participants at the painful site and control site, which indicated a decreased CPM function (p ≤ 0.034). Peripheral BMS patients had lower CPM effects than healthy participants only at the painful site (p = 0.037).The present findings documented impairment of central nociceptive inhibition processing in BMS patients which was more extensive in central BMS than peripheral BMS. These findings add to the suggestion that BMS may a heterogeneous pain condition with at least two different phenotypes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Chronic pain is a constantly recurring and persistent illness, presenting a formidable healthcare challenge for patients and physicians alike. Current first‐line analgesics offer only low‐modest efficacy when averaged across populations, further contributing to this debilitating disease burden. Moreover, many recent trials for novel analgesics have not met primary efficacy endpoints, which is particularly striking considering the pharmacological advances have provided a range of highly relevant new drug targets. Heterogeneity within chronic pain cohorts is increasingly understood to play a critical role in these failures of treatment and drug discovery, with some patients deriving substantial benefits from a given intervention while it has little‐to‐no effect on others. As such, current treatment failures may not result from a true lack of efficacy, but rather a failure to target individuals whose pain is driven by mechanisms which it therapeutically modulates. This necessitates a move towards phenotypical stratification of patients to delineate responders and non‐responders in a mechanistically driven manner. In this article, we outline a bench‐to‐bedside roadmap for this transition to mechanistically informed personalised pain medicine. We emphasise how the successful identification of novel analgesics is dependent on rigorous experimental design as well as the validity of models and translatability of outcome measures between the animal model and patients. Subsequently, we discuss general and specific aspects of human trial design to address heterogeneity in patient populations to increase the chance of identifying effective analgesics. Finally, we show how stratification approaches can be brought into clinical routine to the benefit of patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study aimed to quantify somatosensory profiles in individuals with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). We included 28 participants with genetically confirmed DMD (aged 8–17 years), 14 with chronic pain (DMD-CP), and 14 without pain (DMD-NP), compared to 13 healthy controls (HC) matched for age and sex. Three quantitative sensory testing (QST) modalities were examined: pressure pain threshold (PPT), temporal summation of pain (TSP) and conditioned pain modulation (CPM). Characteristics related to chronic pain, fatigue, psychological distress, and health-related quality of life were assessed using questionnaires. Decreased PPTs were found in both DMD cohorts across body areas commonly affected by pain (rectus femoris, medial gastrocnemius, paraspinal muscles, upper trapezius), as well as in a less frequently affected remote area (thenar eminence), compared to HCs (p < 0.001). The DMD-CP group exhibited greater TSP compared to HCs (p = 0.025). There were no differences in CPM effects between DMD groups and HCs. No differences were detected in all QST measures between DMD-CP and DMD-NP. This study is the first to explore the somatosensory profile in DMD. Preliminary evidence suggests that generalized hyperalgesia may be a common feature in DMD regardless of pain status. QST measures appear to not distinguish individuals with chronic pain from those without and thus are not recommended for assessing pain in DMD or guiding treatment. • This study marks the first step investigating somatosensory profile in DMD. • Generalized hyperalgesia is common in DMD regardless of pain status. • QST measures cannot differentiate between individuals with chronic pain and those without. • QST is not recommended for assessing pain or guiding treatment in DMD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Context Due to the heterogenous clinical symptoms and deficits, the diagnosis of diabetic polyneuropathy (DPN) is still difficult in clinical routines, leading to increased morbidity and mortality. Objective We studied the correlation of phase angle (PhA) of bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) with clinical, laboratory, and physical markers of DPN to evaluate PhA as a possible diagnostic method for DPN. Materials and methods In this cross-sectional observational study as part of the Heidelberg Study on Diabetes and Complications, we examined 104 healthy individuals and 205 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D), among which 63 had DPN. The PhA was calculated from multifrequency BIA. Nerve conduction studies, quantitative sensory testing (QST) and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance neurography to determine fractional anisotropy (FA) reflecting peripheral nerve integrity were performed. Results T2D patients with DPN had lower PhA values (5.71 ± 0.10) compared to T2D patients without DPN (6.07 ± 0.08, P =.007, + 6.1%) and healthy controls (6.18 ± 0.08, P <.001, + 7.9%). Confounder-adjusted analyses showed correlations of the PhA with conduction velocities and amplitudes of the peroneal (β=.28; β=.31, P <.001) and tibial nerves (β=.28; β=.32, P <.001), Z-scores of QST (thermal detection β=.30, P <.05) and the FA (β=.60, P <.001). Receiver-operating characteristic analysis showed similar performance of PhA in comparison to the mentioned diagnostic methods. Conclusion The study shows that PhA is, in comparison to other test systems used, at least an equally good and much easier to handle investigator-independent marker for detection of DPN. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Objectives: Conditioned pain modulation (CPM) is a psychophysical experimental measure of the endogenous pain inhibitory pathway in humans, wherein one pain stimulus (the conditioning stimulus) is used to inhibit an individual's perception of a second painful (test) stimulus. Research provides evidence of impaired endogenous inhibitory pain responses in adults with chronic pain. CPM is now increasingly applied in paediatric research and clinical practice. The primary aim of this systematic review was to examine the efficacy of CPM in paediatric chronic pain populations (6–24-year-olds) compared to pain-free children and young people (CYP). Methods: The protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42020221927). A systematic search of seven databases was conducted from database inception to 20th June 2024. Study inclusion criteria were as follows: (i) recruited a sample of CYP aged 6 to 24 (inclusive) with chronic pain or who were pain-free; and (ii) applied a CPM paradigm comprising both a painful test and conditioning stimuli that were sufficiently detailed to allow for replication,(iii) adhered to a study design of randomised control trial, case control or cohort study, including cross-sectional or longitudinal; (iv) available in the English language. Study exclusion criteria were: (i) The CPM paradigm used a non-painful test or conditioning stimulus only; and (ii) was only available as an abstract, letter, poster, editorial, case report, or review with or without meta-analyses. Risk of bias was assessed using the Appraisal Tool for Cross Sectional Studies (AXIS). Meta-analyses were conducted in Comprehensive Meta Analysis 3.0 using random effects models to compare the overall CPM responses in CYP with chronic pain conditions to healthy control CYP. Results: Thirty-two studies were eligible for inclusion, six of which were included in one or more meta-analysis (n = 407 chronic pain, n = 205 control). Meta-analysis revealed significantly weaker CPM responses in CYP with a variety of chronic pain conditions compared to healthy controls (standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.352), and significantly weaker CPM responses in CYP with abdominal pain conditions compared to healthy controls (SMD = 0.685). No significant difference in CPM response was found between CYP with migraine and healthy controls (SMD = −0.201). Conclusions: Variable results were found across individual studies, and the meta-analysis of the small number of eligible studies provides tentative evidence for impaired CPM in CYP with chronic pain compared to healthy controls. Further research is clearly needed. In particular, studies should present CPM results separately for different age groups, ethnic groups, and sexes, as these variables shape clinical pain responses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To investigate the relationship between sacroiliac joint (SIJ) involvement and central sensitization (CS) in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). Patients and Methods: Twenty-four patients with axSpA were included in this study. CS was investigated via pressure pain threshold (PPT), temporal summation (TS), conditional pain modulation (CPM), and the central sensitization inventory (CSI). Sacroiliac joint involvement was assessed using the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based Canadian Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium (SPARCC) scoring system. CS-related parameters and SPARCC score correlations were analyzed. Results: The median (IQR) sacroiliac PPT score for the right SIJ was calculated as 17.47 (4.43) and 17.67 (4.57) for the left SIJ. In the TS measurement, the right SIJ TS median (IQR) value was calculated as 4.0 (3.5) and 4.0 (2.75) for the left side. The median (IQR) value was 149.67 (107.5) for CPM and 45.0 (27.75) for CSI. The median (IQR) sacroiliac inflammation score was calculated as 3.0 (8.75), and the median (IQR) structural score was calculated as 7.0 (11.5). No correlation was found between SPARCC scores and PPT, TS, CPM, and CSI values. Conclusion: In axSpA patients, there was no association observed between pain sensitivity measures and sacroiliac involvement. Further comprehensive studies are required, taking into account the complex nature of CS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Recent evidence suggests that both serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) levels and small fiber related diagnostic variables may be valuable disease biomarkers of hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis with polyneuropathy (ATTRv-PN). Our study aimed to explore the relations between sNfL and small fiber related skin biopsy and quantitative sensory testing (QST) parameters in a cohort of ATTRv-PN patients and pre-symptomatic carriers. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from 13 ATTRv patients and 21 pre-symptomatic carriers who underwent sNfL dosage, skin biopsy, and QST, and analyzed correlations between sNFL, intraepidermal nerve fiber density (IENFD), and cold (CDT) and warm detection thresholds (WDT). Results: Both sNfL and small fiber related parameters significantly differed between carriers and patients (sNfL: p < 0.0001; IENFD: p = 0.0008; CDT, WDT: < 0.0001). sNFL levels were normal in all carriers, altered in 85% of patients, negatively correlated with distal IENFD (r = -0.47, p = 0.005), and significantly correlated with CDT (r = -0.68; p < 0.0001) and WDT (r = 0.57; p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Our study showed that sNfL reliably discriminates symptomatic ATTRv-PN patients from pre-symptomatic carriers, and found significant relations between sNfL, skin biopsy, and QST small fiber related parameters, suggesting that sNfL might be a valuable biomarker of peripheral nerve involvement in ATTRv-PN and a supportive criterion for symptomatic disease transition. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

* OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to compare sensory processing measures in people attending specialist orthopaedic consultation for management of persistent shoulder pain with control participants. The secondary objective was to compare the groups' sociodemographic, clinical, general health and lifestyle, and psychological characteristics. * DESIGN: Observational cross-sectional. * METHODS: Participants with shoulder pain for ≥3 months, who attended a public hospital orthopaedic department (n = 119), and community participants without shoulder pain (n = 44) underwent a standardized quantitative sensory testing protocol, measuring pressure pain threshold, temporal summation, and conditioned pain modulation. Sociodemographic, clinical, general health and lifestyle, and psychological characteristics were also collected. * RESULTS: Participants with shoulder pain had significantly lower pressure pain thresholds at all sites (ie, local and widespread mechanical hyperalgesia) and significantly decreased conditioned pain modulation effect (ie, descending inhibition of nociception) than control participants. There was no significant difference between groups for temporal summation. Participants with shoulder pain had decreased general health and function, less healthy lifestyles, and poorer psychological health compared with controls. * CONCLUSION: People referred to specialist orthopaedic care for management of persistent shoulder pain had clinical signs of altered sensory processing and poor health outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

INTRODUCTION: Prior research suggests that African Americans (AAs) have more frequent, intense, and debilitating pain and functional disability compared with non-Hispanic Whites (NHWs). Potential contributing factors to this disparity are physical activity and sedentary behavior, given that AAs are less physically active, and physical activity is associated with antinociception (whereas sedentary behavior is linked to pronociception). However, impact of these factors on pain processing has largely been unexplored in AAs, especially before chronic pain onset. OBJECTIVE: This study examined relationships between physical activity, sedentary behavior (sitting time), and laboratory measures of pain and pain modulation in adult AAs. These included heat pain threshold and tolerance, temporal summation of pain (TSP, a marker of central sensitization), and conditioned pain modulation (CPM, a marker of descending pain inhibition). METHODS: Multiple regressions were conducted to examine the effects of physical activity and sitting time on heat threshold and tolerance. Multilevel models were conducted to assess the relationship between physical activity, sitting time, and temporal summation of pain. Additional multilevel models were conducted to assess the relationship between physical activity, sitting time, and conditioned pain modulation. RESULTS: Higher level of physical activity, but not sitting time, was associated with reduced TSP slopes. Neither physical activity nor sitting time was associated with CPM slopes. No significant relationships between physical activity or sitting time and heat pain threshold or tolerance were detected. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that physical activity is associated with reduced TSP, an effect which may be driven by reduced spinal hyperexcitability in more active individuals. Thus, structural and individual interventions designed to increase physical activity in healthy, young AAs may be able to promote antinociceptive processes (ie, reduced TSP/reduced pain facilitation) potentially protective against chronic pain.

AbstractUrologic chronic pelvic pain syndrome (UCPPS) is a complex, debilitating condition in which patients often report nonpelvic pain in addition to localized pelvic pain. Understanding differential predictors of pelvic pain only vs widespread pain may provide novel pathways for intervention. This study leveraged baseline data from the Multidisciplinary Approach to the Study of Chronic Pelvic Pain (MAPP) Research Network's Symptom Pattern Study to investigate the impact of childhood sexual and nonsexual violent trauma on pelvic and nonpelvic pain sensitivity among adult patients with UCPPS, as well as potential mediators of this association. Study participants who met inclusion criteria for UCPPS completed questionnaires assessing childhood and recent trauma, affective distress, cognitive dysfunction, and generalized sensory sensitivity. Experimental pain sensitivity was also evaluated using standardized pressure pain applied to the pubic region and the arm. Bivariate analyses showed that childhood violent trauma was associated with more nonviolent childhood trauma, more recent trauma, poorer adult functioning, and greater pain sensitivity at the pubic region, but not pain sensitivity at the arm. Path analysis suggested that childhood violent trauma was indirectly associated with pain sensitivity at both sites and that this indirect association was primarily mediated by generalized sensory sensitivity. More experiences of recent trauma also contributed to these indirect effects. The findings suggest that, among participants with UCPPS, childhood violent trauma may be associated with heightened pain sensitivity to the extent that trauma history is associated with a subsequent increase in generalized sensory sensitivity.

The Biobehavioral Working Group of BACPAC was charged to evaluate a range of psychosocial, psychophysical, and behavioral domains relevant to chronic low back pain, and recommend specific assessment tools and procedures to harmonize biobehavioral data collection across the consortium. Primary references and sources for measure selection were the Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials, the Minimum Data Set from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Research Task Force on Standards for Chronic Low Back Pain, the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System, and NeuroQOL. The questionnaire's recommendations supplemented the NIH HEAL Common Data Elements and BACPAC Minimum Data Set. Five domains were identified for inclusion: Pain Characteristics and Qualities; Pain-Related Psychosocial/Behavioral Factors; General Psychosocial Factors; Lifestyle Choices; and Social Determinants of Health/Social Factors. The Working Group identified best practices for required and optional Quantitative Sensory Testing of psychophysical pain processing for use in BACPAC projects.

Abstract Background The motor neuron survival protein performs numerous cellular functions; hence, spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is considered to be a multi-organ disease with possible sensory system damage. The controversy surrounding the presence of sensory disturbances, prompted us to conduct standard electrophysiological studies and assess the sensory thresholds for different modalities in adults with SMA types 2 and 3. The study group consisted of 44 adult SMA patients (types 2 and 3). All patients underwent neurological examination using the Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale – Expanded (HFMSE). Standard sensory electrophysiological studies in the ulnar nerve and the estimation of vibratory, temperature, and warm- and cold-induced pain thresholds with temperature dispersion assessment were performed using quantitative sensory testing (QST). Results The most repeatable result was the high amplitude of the sensory nerve action potentials (SNAP) in SMA patients compared to controls. This was higher in type 2 patients compared to type 3a and 3b patients and patients with low HFSME scores. Patients with SMA, especially type 3b presented a longer sensory latency and slower conduction velocity than did controls. Cold pain threshold was higher and warm dispersion larger in SMA. The vibratory limit was higher in patients with high HFSME scores. Conclusions A high SNAP amplitude suggests sensory fibre hyperactivity, which may be based on overactivation of metabolic pathways as an adaptive mechanism in response to SMN protein deficiency with additionally coexisting small C- and A-delta fibre damage. SMA patients seem to have a concomitant, mild demyelinating process present at the early SMA stage.

Abstract Background Pediatric headache is an increasing medical problem that has adverse effects on children’s quality of life, academic performance, and social functioning. Children with primary headaches exhibit enhanced sensory sensitivity compared to their healthy peers. However, comprehensive investigations including multimodal sensory sensitivity assessment are lacking. This study aimed to compare sensory sensitivity of children with primary headaches with their healthy peers across multiple sensory domains. Methods The study included 172 participants aged 6 to 17 years (M = 13.09, SD = 3.02 years; 120 girls). Of these 80 participants were patients with migraine, 23 were patients with tension-type headache, and 69 were healthy controls. The following sensory measures were obtained: Mechanical Detection Threshold (MDT), Mechanical Pain Threshold (MPT), Mechanical Pain Sensitivity (MPS), detection and pain threshold for Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS), olfactory and intranasal trigeminal detection threshold, and odor identification ability. Sensory sensitivity was compared between groups with a series of Kruskal-Wallis tests. Binomial regression models were used to compare the relative utility of sensory sensitivity measures in classifying participants into patients and healthy controls, as well as into patients with migraine and tension-type headache. Results Patients with migraine had lower MPT measured at the forearm than patients with tension-type headaches and healthy controls. MPS was higher in patients with migraine than in healthy controls. All patients with headaches had lower detection threshold of TENS and higher olfactory sensitivity. Healthy controls showed increased intranasal trigeminal sensitivity. Scores in MPS, TENS, and olfactory and trigeminal thresholds were significantly predicting presence of primary headaches. Additionally, scores in MPT, olfactory and trigeminal threshold were positive predictors of type of headache. Conclusions Children with primary headaches exhibit different sensory profiles than healthy controls. The obtained results suggest presence of increased overall, multimodal sensitivity in children with primary headaches, what may negatively impact daily functioning and contribute to further pain chronification. Trial registration The study was registered in the German Registry of Clinical Trials (DRKS) DRKS00021062.

Abstract Background Physiotherapeutic management is the first-line intervention for patients with entrapment neuropathies such as carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). As part of physiotherapy, neurodynamic interventions are often used to treat people with peripheral nerve involvement, but their mechanisms of action are yet to be fully understood. The MONET (mechanisms of neurodynamic treatment) study aims to investigate the mechanisms of action of neurodynamic exercise intervention on nerve structure, and function. Methods This mechanistic, randomised, single-blind, controlled trial will include 78 people with electrodiagnostically confirmed mild or moderate CTS and 30 healthy participants (N = 108). Patients will be randomly assigned into (1) a 6-week progressive home-based neurodynamic exercise intervention (n = 26), (2) a steroid injection (= 26), or (3) advice (n = 26) group. The primary outcome measure is fractional anisotropy of the median nerve at the wrist using advanced magnetic resonance neuroimaging. Secondary outcome measures include neuroimaging markers at the wrist, quantitative sensory testing, electrodiagnostics, and patient reported outcome measures. Exploratory outcomes include neuroimaging markers at the cervical spine, inflammatory and axonal integrity markers in serial blood samples and biopsies of median nerve innervated skin. We will evaluate outcome measures at baseline and at the end of the 6-week intervention period. We will repeat questionnaires at 6-months. Two-way repeated measures ANCOVAs, followed by posthoc testing will be performed to identify differences in outcome measures among groups and over time. Discussion This study will advance our understanding of the mechanisms of action underpinning neurodynamic exercises, which will ultimately help clinicians to better target these treatments to those patients who may benefit from them. The inclusion of a positive control group (steroid injection) and a negative control group (advice) will strengthen the interpretation of our results. Trial registration NCT05859412, 20/4/2023.

Introduction: Previously, we had observed that immediate pain reduction after one acupuncture treatment was associated with high temporal summation of pain (TS) at a pain free control site and younger age in a mixed population of chronic pain patients. The aim of the present study was to verify these results in chronic non-specific low back pain (LBP) and to collect pilot data on the association between TS and the response to an acupuncture series. Methods: TS at a pain free control site (back of dominant hand) and at the pain site was quantified by the pin-prick induced wind-up ratio (WUR) in 60 LBP patients aged 50 years or younger. Response to one acupuncture treatment was assessed by change in pain intensity and pressure pain threshold (PPT) at the pain site. The primary hypothesis was that a high TS (WUR > 2.5) would be associated with a clinically relevant reduction in pain intensity of at least 30%. In study part two, 26 patients received nine additional treatments. Response to the acupuncture series was assessed by the pain intensity during the last week, the PPT and the Hannover functional ability questionnaire (FFbH-R). Results: An immediate reduction in pain intensity of at least 30% was frequent irrespective of TS at the control site (low vs. high TS 58% vs. 72%, p = 0.266). High TS at the pain site was also not significantly associated with a clinically relevant immediate reduction in pain intensity (low vs. high TS 46% vs. 73%, p = 0.064). The PPT was not changed after one acupuncture treatment. Study part two did not reveal a consistent association between TS at the control site and any of the outcome measures but also a trend toward a higher chance for a clinically relevant response along with low TS at the pain site. Conclusion: Our results do not suggest an important role of TS for predicting a clinically important acupuncture effect or the response to a series of 10 acupuncture treatments in patients with chronic non-specific LBP. Overall high response rates imply that acupuncture is a suitable treatment option for LBP patients irrespective of their TS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Objectives: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) often causes damage to small nerve fibers, leading to distressing painful and autonomic symptoms. Despite this, Small Fiber Neuropathy (SFN) remains an underrecognized complication for SLE patients. In this cross‐sectional study, we aimed to assess SFN in patients with SLE and to explore its correlations with immunologic disease features and clinical manifestations. Methods: We recruited 50 SLE patients (1 male to 12.5 females, aged 20–80 years) reporting painful disturbances. We conducted a comprehensive clinical and neurophysiological evaluation, using Nerve Conduction Studies and Quantitative Sensory Testing. Additionally, we carried out an extensive laboratory assessment of disease‐related serological parameters. We also performed a thorough skin biopsy analysis, investigating somatic and autonomic innervation while detecting complement and inflammatory cell infiltrates within the skin. Results: Out of 50 patients, 19 were diagnosed with SFN, primarily characterized by a non‐length‐dependent distribution; 7 had a mixed neuropathy, with both large and small fiber involvement. Patients with SFN were younger than patients with a mixed neuropathy (p =.0143); furthermore, they were more likely to have a history of hypocomplementemia (p =.0058) and to be treated with cyclosporine A (p =.0053) compared to patients without neuropathy. However, there were no significant differences in painful and autonomic symptoms between patients with and without SFN. Discussion: This study highlights the relevant frequency of SFN with a non‐length‐dependent distribution among SLE patients experiencing painful symptoms. Indeed, SFN emerges as an early manifestation of SLE‐related neuropathy and is closely associated with hypocomplementemia, suggesting a potential pathogenic role of the complement system. Moreover, SFN may be influenced by disease‐modifying therapies. However, the precise role of SFN in shaping painful and autonomic symptoms in patients with SLE remains to be fully elucidated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Rodents and human studies indicate that the hippocampus, a brain region necessary for memory processing, responds to noxious stimuli. However, the hippocampus has yet to be considered a key brain region directly involved in the human pain experience. One approach to answer this question is to perform quantitative sensory testing on patients with hippocampal damage--ie, medial temporal lobe epilepsy. Some case studies and case series have performed such tests in a handful of patients with various types of epilepsy and have reported mixed results. Here, we aimed to determine whether mechanical pain sensitivity was altered in patients diagnosed with temporal lobe epilepsy. We first investigated whether mechanical pain sensitivity in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy differs from that of healthy individuals. Next, in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy, we evaluated whether the degree of pain sensitivity is associated with the degree of hippocampal integrity. Structural integrity was based on hippocampal volume, and functional integrity was based on verbal and visuospatial memory scores. Our findings show that patients with temporal lobe epilepsy have lower mechanical pain sensitivity than healthy individuals. Only left hippocampal volume was positively associated with mechanical pain sensitivity--the greater the hippocampal damage, the lower the sensitivity to mechanical pain. Hippocampal measures of functional integrity were not significantly associated with mechanical pain sensitivity, suggesting that the mechanisms of hippocampal pain processing may be different than its memory functions. Future studies are necessary to determine the mechanisms of pain processing in the hippocampus. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In humans and animals, high-frequency electrocutaneous stimulation (HFS) induces an "early long-term potentiation-like" sensitisation, where synaptic plasticity is underpinned by an ill-defined interaction between peripheral input and central modulatory processes. The relative contributions of these processes to the initial pain or nociceptive response likely differ from those that underpin development of the heightened response. To investigate the impact of HFS-induced hyperalgesia on pain and nociception in perception and neural terms, respectively, and to explore the impact of descending inhibitory pathway activation on the development of HFS-induced hyperalgesia, we performed parallel studies utilising identical stimuli to apply HFS concurrent to (1) a conditioned pain modulation paradigm during psychophysical testing in healthy humans or (2) a diffuse noxious inhibitory controls paradigm during in vivo electrophysiological recording of spinal neurones in healthy anaesthetised rats. High-frequency electrocutaneous stimulation alone induced enhanced perceptual responses to pinprick stimuli in cutaneous areas secondary to the area of electrical stimulation in humans and increased the excitability of spinal neurones which exhibited stimulus intensity-dependent coded responses to pinprick stimulation in a manner that tracked with human psychophysics, supporting their translational validity. Application of a distant noxious conditioning stimulus during HFS did not alter perceived primary or secondary hyperalgesia in humans or the development of primary or secondary neuronal hyperexcitability in rats compared with HFS alone, suggesting that, upon HFS-response initiation in a healthy nervous system, excitatory signalling escapes inhibitory control. Therefore, in this model, dampening facilitatory mechanisms rather than augmenting top-down inhibitions could prevent pain development. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The motor neuron survival protein performs numerous cellular functions; hence, spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is considered to be a multi-organ disease with possible sensory system damage. The controversy surrounding the presence of sensory disturbances, prompted us to conduct standard electrophysiological studies and assess the sensory thresholds for different modalities in adults with SMA types 2 and 3. The study group consisted of 44 adult SMA patients (types 2 and 3). All patients underwent neurological examination using the Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale – Expanded (HFMSE). Standard sensory electrophysiological studies in the ulnar nerve and the estimation of vibratory, temperature, and warm- and cold-induced pain thresholds with temperature dispersion assessment were performed using quantitative sensory testing (QST). Results: The most repeatable result was the high amplitude of the sensory nerve action potentials (SNAP) in SMA patients compared to controls. This was higher in type 2 patients compared to type 3a and 3b patients and patients with low HFSME scores. Patients with SMA, especially type 3b presented a longer sensory latency and slower conduction velocity than did controls. Cold pain threshold was higher and warm dispersion larger in SMA. The vibratory limit was higher in patients with high HFSME scores. Conclusions: A high SNAP amplitude suggests sensory fibre hyperactivity, which may be based on overactivation of metabolic pathways as an adaptive mechanism in response to SMN protein deficiency with additionally coexisting small C- and A-delta fibre damage. SMA patients seem to have a concomitant, mild demyelinating process present at the early SMA stage. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Chronic muscle pain is common in myotonic dystrophies (DM). Little is known about its pathophysiology. We aimed to investigate the characteristics of the neuropathic pain component contributing contributes to the pathogenesis of chronic pain in DM. Methods: Twenty-one DM1 and 32 DM2 patients completed pain questionnaires (Brief pain inventory--BPI, PAIN-DETECT, pain disability index--PDI) and underwent neurological examination, nerve conduction studies (NCS), quantitative sensory testing (QST, dorsum of the right hand and right thigh) and skin biopsy to determine the intraepidermal nerve fiber density (IENFD, distal and proximal site of lower extremity). NCS and QST results at the thigh were compared to 27 healthy controls and IENFD and QST at the dorsum of the hand to published reference values. Results: The sensory profile of DM2 patients was characterized by a loss in thermal and mechanical detection, while DM1 patients showed reduced mechanical and heat pain thresholds and higher mechanical pain sensitivity. Both DM groups showed pressure hyperalgesia. IENFD was reduced in 63% of DM1 patients and 50% of DM2. The slightly higher pain interference and disability found in DM2 was rather due to age difference than disease. Conclusion: Similar pain mechanisms likely occur in both DM1 and DM2, even though a tendency toward more pain sensitivity was observed in DM1 and more sensory loss in DM2. Both QST and reduced IENFD highlight the presence of peripheral nerve damage in DM. This must be considered for the best pain management strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Micro-RNAs could provide great insights about the neuropathological mechanisms associated with osteoarthritis (OA) pain processing. Using the validated Montreal Induction of Rat Arthritis Testing (MIRAT) model, this study aimed to characterize neuroepigenetic markers susceptible to correlate with innovative pain functional phenotype and targeted neuropeptide alterations. Methods: Functional biomechanical, somatosensory sensitization (peripheral--via tactile paw withdrawal threshold; central--via response to mechanical temporal summation), and diffuse noxious inhibitory control (via conditioned pain modulation) alterations were assessed sequentially in OA (n = 12) and Naïve (n = 12) rats. Joint structural, targeted spinal neuropeptides and differential expression of spinal cord micro-RNAs analyses were conducted at the sacrifice (day (D) 56). Results: The MI-RAT model caused important structural damages (reaching 35.77% of cartilage surface) compared to the Naïve group (P < 0.001). This was concomitantly associated with nociceptive sensitization: ipsilateral weight shift to the contralateral hind limb (asymmetry index) from -55.61% ± 8.50% (D7) to -26.29% ± 8.50% (D35) (P < 0.0001); mechanical pain hypersensitivity was present as soon as D7 and persisting until D56 (P < 0.008); central sensitization was evident at D21 (P = 0.038); pain endogenous inhibitory control was distinguished with higher conditioned pain modulation rate (P < 0.05) at D7, D21, and D35 as a reflect of filtrated pain perception. Somatosensory profile alterations of OA rats were translated in a persistent elevation of pro-nociceptive neuropeptides substance P and bradykinin, along with an increased expression of spinal miR-181b (P = 0.029) at D56. Conclusion: The MI-RAT OA model is associated, not only with structural lesions and static weight-bearing alterations, but also with a somatosensory profile that encompasses pain centralized sensitization, associated to active endogenous inhibitory/facilitatory controls, and corresponding neuropeptidomic and neuroepigenetic alterations. This preliminary neuroepigenetic research confirms the crucial role of pain endogenous inhibitory control in the development of OA chronic pain (not only hypersensitivity) and validates the MI-RAT model for its study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Irritability is a foundational clinical reasoning concept in rehabilitation to evaluate reactivity of the examination and treatment. While originally theorized to reflect tissue damage, a large body of evidence supports pain is a biopsychosocial experience impacted by pain sensitivity and psychological factors. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine biopsychosocial contributors to irritability. Methods: 40 patients with shoulder (n = 20) and low back (n = 20) pain underwent Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) (Pressure Pain Threshold, Heat Pain Threshold, Conditioned Pain Modulation, Temporal Summation), completed pain-related psychological questionnaires, an Exercise-Induced Hypoalgesia protocol, and standardized irritability assessment based on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Participants were then categorized as irritable or not irritable based on Maitland's criteria and by irritability level based on Clinical Practice Guidelines. An independent samples t-test examined for differences in QST and psychological factors by irritability category. A MANOVA examined for differences in QST and psychological factors by irritability level (high, moderate, low). Results: Significantly lower heat and pressure pain thresholds at multiple locations (p < 0.05), as well as less efficient conditioned pain modulation (p = 0.02), were demonstrated in individuals categorized as irritable. Heat and pressure pain thresholds were also significantly lower in patients with high irritability compared to other levels. Significantly higher depression and anger, as well as lower self-efficacy, were reported in individuals with an irritable presentation. Discussion/Conclusion: Biopsychosocial factors, including widespread hyperalgesia and elevated psychological factors, may contribute to an irritable presentation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Psychosocial function of Chinese temporomandibular disorders (TMD) pain patients and the correlation with somatosensory function has not been sufficiently studied. Objective: The study aims at assessing the psychosocial function of Chinese TMD pain patients by visualisation method and evaluating the correlations with somatosensory function quantitatively. Methods: The Symptom Checklist 90 (SCL‐90) questionnaire and standardised quantitative sensory testing (QST) were administered to 70 Chinese TMD pain patients and age‐ and gender‐matched healthy controls (HCs). Of these, 40 TMD arthralgia patients received QST before and after medication. Psychosocial and somatosensory parameters were transformed into standardised scores. Differences within groups were assessed through t tests. Correlations between psychosocial and somatosensory profiles were explored through correlation analyses with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. Results: 100% of the Chinese TMD pain patients exhibited psychosocial distress in contrast to HCs. Anger and hostility showed negative correlation with the thermal nonnociceptive parameter (thermal sensory limen, p =.002) and nociceptive parameters (cold pain threshold and pain pressure threshold, p<.001). Correlation analysis indicated that cold detection threshold was negatively correlated with somatization and mechanical pain sensitivity had a negative correlation with anger and hostility through medical treatment (p <.001). Conclusions: Visual psychosocial profiles provided an easy overview of psychosocial function in Chinese TMD pain patients. Anger and hostility was associated with increased thermal nonnociceptive and nociceptive sensitivity to stimuli. Psychosocial distress might be negatively associated with TMD treatment response which indicated a possible need for psychological intervention during treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Physiotherapeutic management is the first-line intervention for patients with entrapment neuropathies such as carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). As part of physiotherapy, neurodynamic interventions are often used to treat people with peripheral nerve involvement, but their mechanisms of action are yet to be fully understood. The MONET (mechanisms of neurodynamic treatment) study aims to investigate the mechanisms of action of neurodynamic exercise intervention on nerve structure, and function. Methods: This mechanistic, randomised, single-blind, controlled trial will include 78 people with electrodiagnostically confirmed mild or moderate CTS and 30 healthy participants (N = 108). Patients will be randomly assigned into (1) a 6-week progressive home-based neurodynamic exercise intervention (n = 26), (2) a steroid injection (= 26), or (3) advice (n = 26) group. The primary outcome measure is fractional anisotropy of the median nerve at the wrist using advanced magnetic resonance neuroimaging. Secondary outcome measures include neuroimaging markers at the wrist, quantitative sensory testing, electrodiagnostics, and patient reported outcome measures. Exploratory outcomes include neuroimaging markers at the cervical spine, inflammatory and axonal integrity markers in serial blood samples and biopsies of median nerve innervated skin. We will evaluate outcome measures at baseline and at the end of the 6-week intervention period. We will repeat questionnaires at 6-months. Two-way repeated measures ANCOVAs, followed by posthoc testing will be performed to identify differences in outcome measures among groups and over time. Discussion: This study will advance our understanding of the mechanisms of action underpinning neurodynamic exercises, which will ultimately help clinicians to better target these treatments to those patients who may benefit from them. The inclusion of a positive control group (steroid injection) and a negative control group (advice) will strengthen the interpretation of our results. Trial registration: NCT05859412, 20/4/2023. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]