Search

Background: Dexamethasone in conjunction with type 3 serotonin receptor antagonists are being used to the prevention and treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting and postoperative nausea and vomiting in clinic. The present study aimed to investigates the stability of ramosetron with dexamethasone in infusions, with the goal of enhancing the safety and clinical applicability of their combined use. Methods: Ramosetron hydrochloride (3.0 μg/mL) combining with dexamethasone (0.05, 0.1, 0.2 mg/mL) were prepared with 0.9% sodium chloride injection and then packaged in polyolefin bags or glass bottles. The stability were investigated kept in the dark at refrigeration for 14 days and at room temperature for 48 h. Results: The concentration of both drugs maintained at least 97% in the various solutions for both storage conditions with light protection. In the light exposure conditions, as the extension of storage time, the concentration of both drugs had declined. All antiemetic mixture solutions remained clear and no changes in color, turbidity, precipitation, and the pH remained stable. The insoluble particles were in line with Chinese Pharmacopoeia. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that combinations of ramosetron hydrochloride with dexamethasone sodium phosphate in 0.9% sodium chloride injection remain stable for 14 days at 4°C and 48 h at 25°C when protected from light. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of intravenous ramosetron for pain relief in patients with fibromyalgia (FM) unresponsive to conventional treatments. Methods In this prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 80 FM patients were randomly allocated to receive either placebo (n  = 40) or ramosetron (n  = 40) at a dosage of 0.3 mg/day intravenously for five consecutive days. The primary outcome was the reduction in pain intensity at the end of the treatment period, evaluated using a visual analogue scale (VAS). Secondary outcome measures included the FM Impact Questionnaire, Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Multi-Dimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MDHAQ), EQ-5D and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory on days 5 (end of treatment), 7, 10 and 28. Safety was continuously monitored throughout the study. Results At the end of the treatment phase, the ramosetron group demonstrated a significantly greater reduction in VAS pain scores compared with the placebo group (1.18 ± 1.60 vs 0.54 ± 1.59, P  < 0.05). Additionally, the ramosetron group exhibited significant improvements in BDI (4.42 ± 5.18 vs 1.33 ± 4.87, P  < 0.05) and MDHAQ pain scale (0.37 ± 0.74 vs 0.04 ± 0.52, P  < 0.05) scores. However, these improvements in pain VAS and BDI scores were not sustained through day 28. The safety profile of ramosetron was favorable, with gastrointestinal symptoms, particularly constipation, being the most commonly reported adverse events. Conclusions Intravenous administration of ramosetron provided safe and effective short-term relief of pain intensity in FM patients with inadequate response to standard treatments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Several studies have investigated the effect of antiemetics on postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in high-risk groups. However, few studies have investigated the effect of antiemetics in patients at low risk of developing PONV. Methods In this prospective, randomized, double-blinded trial, 177 patients undergoing surgery under general anesthesia were randomly allocated to three groups. Patients allocated to group C (control group) received 2 mL of intravenous 0.9% saline, those allocated to group R (ramosetron group) received 0.3 mg of intravenous ramosetron, and those allocated to group DR (ramosetron plus dexamethasone group) received 5 mg of intravenous dexamethasone and 0.3 mg of intravenous ramosetron. Results Finally, 174 patients completed the study, and the types of surgeries were orthopedic (n = 80), rhinologic (n = 47), urologic (n = 29), and others (n = 18). The incidence of PONV up to 48 h postoperatively was significantly lower in group DR than in group C. The incidence of PONV up to 0–1 h postoperatively was significantly lower in groups R and DR than in group C. The usage pattern of rescue antiemetics was consistent with the incidence of PONV. The percentage of patients requiring rescue analgesics 0–1 h postoperatively was significantly lower in groups R and DR than in group C. Conclusions The combination of dexamethasone and ramosetron demonstrated a superior effect in preventing PONV for 48 h after surgery under general anesthesia than saline in patients at low risk of developing PONV. Compared with saline injections, ramosetron injections yielded better outcomes for the incidence of PONV and the use of rescue antiemetics and rescue analgesics 0–1 h postoperatively. Trial registration Clinical trial registration number: criskorea@korea.kr, KCT0006749.

Background: The incidence of nausea and vomiting following laparoscopic cholecystectomy is very high. 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor antagonists are drug of choice for prevention of post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) because of their good efficacy and very few side effects in comparison to other antiemetics. Aims and Objectives: This study was undertaken to compare the efficacy and safety of intravenous ramosetron 0.3 mg and ondansetron 8 mg for prevention of PONV in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia. Materials and Methods: One hundred patients between 18 and 70 years of age with American Society of Anesthesiology Grade I and II scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly divided into two groups of 50 patients each. Group A patients were given injection ondansetron 8 mg and Group B patients were given injection ramosetron 0.3 mg approximately 5 min just before the induction of general anesthesia. Results: Difference in Nausea, vomiting/retching, and PONV score assessed at 4, 8, 12, and 24 h interval postoperatively in both groups was found to be statistically insignificant (P>0.05). The severity of nausea was assessed by visual analogue scale at various time intervals and use of rescue antiemetics in both the groups were found statistically insignificant. Incidence of side effects was also comparable in both the groups. Conclusion: Ramosetron and ondansetron are equally effective for prevention of PONV in patients who underwent elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia when used prophylactically. Both drugs are safe and have low incidence of side effects.

Background: Several studies have investigated the effect of antiemetics on postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in high-risk groups. However, few studies have investigated the effect of antiemetics in patients at low risk of developing PONV. Methods: In this prospective, randomized, double-blinded trial, 177 patients undergoing surgery under general anesthesia were randomly allocated to three groups. Patients allocated to group C (control group) received 2 mL of intravenous 0.9% saline, those allocated to group R (ramosetron group) received 0.3 mg of intravenous ramosetron, and those allocated to group DR (ramosetron plus dexamethasone group) received 5 mg of intravenous dexamethasone and 0.3 mg of intravenous ramosetron. Results: Finally, 174 patients completed the study, and the types of surgeries were orthopedic (n = 80), rhinologic (n = 47), urologic (n = 29), and others (n = 18). The incidence of PONV up to 48 h postoperatively was significantly lower in group DR than in group C. The incidence of PONV up to 0–1 h postoperatively was significantly lower in groups R and DR than in group C. The usage pattern of rescue antiemetics was consistent with the incidence of PONV. The percentage of patients requiring rescue analgesics 0–1 h postoperatively was significantly lower in groups R and DR than in group C. Conclusions: The combination of dexamethasone and ramosetron demonstrated a superior effect in preventing PONV for 48 h after surgery under general anesthesia than saline in patients at low risk of developing PONV. Compared with saline injections, ramosetron injections yielded better outcomes for the incidence of PONV and the use of rescue antiemetics and rescue analgesics 0–1 h postoperatively. Trial registration: Clinical trial registration number: criskorea@korea.kr, KCT0006749. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Post operative nausea and vomiting is one of the commonest and unpleasant complications encountered and often cause delay in the discharge of patients. It is often associated with complications like dehydration, haematoma formation, wound dehiscence resulting in prolonged hospital stay. This study aimed to compare the effect of aprepitant and ramosetron, for prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients after intra-abdominal surgeries. Materials and methods: This randomised double blinded study included patients who underwent intra-abdominal surgeries under general anaesthesia. Patients were divided into two groups, group A and B(22 patients in each group) receiving oral aprepitant(80mg) and single dose of intravenous ramosetron(0.3mg) respectively. Incidence and extent of nausea and vomiting, use of rescue antiemetics and number of post operative nausea and vomiting episodes in both the drug groups were assessed at 12,24 and 48 hours after the operation. Results: In patients receiving aprepitant(Group A) incidence and severity of post operative nausea and vomiting were found to be comparable to the same in the patients receiving ramosetron(Group B) in 12th, 24th and 48th post operative hours. Conclusion: It was found that Aprepitant and Ramosetron had comparable efficacy in preventing PONV upto 48 hrs post operatively in patients having abdominal surgeries under general anaesthesia, as well as in aspects of causing adverse effects. Number of patients who experienced nausea and vomiting postoperatively were less in the Group A population(Aprepitant group) compared to the patients in Group B(Ramosetron group). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The incidence of nausea and vomiting following laparoscopic cholecystectomy is very high. 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor antagonists are drug of choice for prevention of post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) because of their good efficacy and very few side effects in comparison to other antiemetics. Aims and Objectives: This study was undertaken to compare the efficacy and safety of intravenous ramosetron 0.3 mg and ondansetron 8 mg for prevention of PONV in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia. Materials and Methods: One hundred patients between 18 and 70 years of age with American Society of Anesthesiology Grade I and II scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly divided into two groups of 50 patients each. Group A patients were given injection ondansetron 8 mg and Group B patients were given injection ramosetron 0.3 mg approximately 5 min just before the induction of general anesthesia. Results: Difference in Nausea, vomiting/retching, and PONV score assessed at 4, 8, 12, and 24 h interval postoperatively in both groups was found to be statistically insignificant (P>0.05). The severity of nausea was assessed by visual analogue scale at various time intervals and use of rescue antiemetics in both the groups were found statistically insignificant. Incidence of side effects was also comparable in both the groups. Conclusion: Ramosetron and ondansetron are equally effective for prevention of PONV in patients who underwent elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia when used prophylactically. Both drugs are safe and have low incidence of side effects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Postoperative delirium (POD) occurs commonly in older adults, resulting in unfavorable outcomes. Several recent clinical studies have suggested that 5-hydroxytryptamine 3 (5-HT3) receptor antagonists can treat and prevent POD. In this retrospective study, the association between 5-HT3 receptor antagonists and POD was investigated in older adults who underwent hip fracture surgery. Methods: The electronic medical records of older adults aged ≥ 65 years who underwent hip fracture surgery between January 2011 and June 2018 were reviewed retrospectively. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to investigate the association between 5-HT3 receptor antagonists and the occurrence of POD. In addition to the incidence of POD, anesthesia-, surgery-, and patient-related factors related to POD were evaluated. Results: Of the 1025 patients included, 813 (79.3%) were administered 5-HT3 receptor antagonists intraoperatively; 471 (45.9%) were administered ramosetron, and 342 (33.4%) were administered palonosetron. POD was identified in 242 patients (23.6%). Ramosetron and palonosetron reduced the POD incidence by 53% (odds ratio [OR] 0.47; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.32‒0.71; P < 0.001) and 41% (OR 0.59; 95% CI 0.39‒0.89; P = 0.011), respectively. Additionally, age, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status class 4, and male were confirmed as risk factors for POD. Conclusion: Intraoperative 5-HT3 receptor antagonists may be associated with a reduced risk of POD and can be considered one of the preventive strategies for POD in older adults undergoing hip fracture surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a common complaint, with an incidence of up to 80% in high-risk patients. The present study was conducted to compare ramosetron with ondansetron for the prevention of post-operative nausea and vomiting in high-risk patients. Materials & Methods: 100 adults undergoing surgeries of both genders were divided into 2 groups of 50 each. Group I received ramosetron 0.3 mg and group II received ondansetron 8 mg, 30 min before the end of surgery. The incidence of PONV, severity of nausea and need for rescue antiemetic were recorded over the next 24 hours. Results: Group I had 26 males and 24 females and group II had 25 males and 25 females. Nausea was seen in 36% and 39%, retching in 9% and 16%, emesis in 13% and 10% and rescue anti- emetic in 24% and 30% in group I and II respectively. The difference was significant (P< 0.05). Nausea was none in 45% in group I and 70% in group II, mild in 30% in group I and 20% in group II and normal in 25 %in group I and 10% in group II. The difference was significant (P< 0.05). Conclusion: Both Ramosetron 0.3 mg and ondansetron 8 mg were equally effective in reducing the incidence of PONV in high- risk patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background This study was performed to evaluate the effectiveness of ramosetron orally disintegrating tablets (ODTs) in preventing post-discharge nausea and/or vomiting (PDNV) in female patients following outpatient surgery under general anesthesia. Methods This multicenter randomized study included three South Korean tertiary hospitals. Before surgery, 138 patients were randomly allocated into two groups. In the ramosetron group, ramosetron ODT 0.1 mg was administered after discharge in the morning of postoperative days 1 and 2. Metoclopramide 10 mg was administered as a rescue antiemetic (capped at 30 mg per day). In the control group, patients were administered only metoclopramide 10 mg when nausea and/or vomiting occurred. The primary outcome was the incidence of nausea during 24 h after discharge. Results We found significant differences in the incidence (13% vs. 33%, P = 0.008) and severity (P = 0.011) of nausea between the ramosetron and the control groups during 24 h after discharge. In addition, the rate of rescue antiemetic (metoclopramide) administration during 24 h after discharge was lower in the ramosetron group (6%) than in the control group (18%) (P = 0.033). Patient satisfaction score was higher in the ramosetron group than in the control group (P < 0.001). Conclusion Ramosetron ODT reduces the incidence and severity of postoperative nausea after discharge during the first 24 h and may be a valuable option for the prevention of PDNV in female patients after day surgery under general anesthesia. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04297293 . Registered on 05 March 2020

This updated systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis aimed to compare the efficacy of the perioperative administration of palonosetron with that of ramosetron in preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). A total of 17 randomized controlled trials comparing the efficacy of the perioperative administration of palonosetron to that of ramosetron for preventing PONV were included. The primary outcomes were the incidences of postoperative nausea (PON), postoperative vomiting (POV), and PONV, which were measured in early, late, and overall phases. Subgroup analysis was performed on the basis of the administration time of the 5-HT3 receptor antagonist and divided into two phases: early phase and the end of surgery. A total of 17 studies with 1823 patients were included in the final analysis. The incidence of retching (relative risk [RR] = 0.525; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.390 to 0.707) and late POV (RR = 0.604; 95% CI = 0.404 to 0.903) was significantly lower in the palonosetron group than in the ramosetron group. No significant differences were demonstrated in the incidence of PON, PONV, complete response, use of antiemetics, and adverse effects. Subgroup analysis showed that palonosetron was superior to ramosetron in terms of early PON, late PON, overall POV, and use of rescue antiemetics when they were administered early; in terms of retching, regardless of the timing of administration. Ramosetron was superior to palonosetron in terms of early PON when they were administered late. The prophylactic administration of palonosetron was more effective than that of ramosetron in preventing the development of retching and late POV. In this meta-analysis, no significant differences in PONV prevention between the two drugs were demonstrated. Further studies are required to validate the outcomes of our study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Patients with quiescent inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) frequently suffer diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D)-like symptoms, such as abdominal pain or stool irregularities. Here, we assessed the effect of ramosetron, a serotonin type 3 (5-HT3) receptor antagonist, on IBS-D-like symptoms in patients with quiescent IBD. Seventy patients with quiescent IBD, who met the Rome III diagnostic criteria for IBS-D, were randomly assigned to receive either ramosetron (5 μg; n = 35) or a placebo (n = 35) orally once daily for 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was the responder rate for global assessment of relief from overall IBS-D-like symptoms. The responder rates for relief of abdominal pain/discomfort and improvement of bowel habits were also evaluated. The responder rate for relief from overall IBS-D-like symptoms at the final evaluation point was significantly higher in the ramosetron group (35.5%) than in the placebo group (11.4%) (p = 0.037). The responder rate for improvement of bowel habits was significantly higher in the ramosetron group (38.7%) than in the placebo group (14.3%) (p = 0.028). The reduction of stool frequency was significantly greater in the ramosetron group than in the placebo group (p = 0.044). Ramosetron is effective for relief of overall IBS-D-like symptoms in patients with quiescent IBD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The entorhinal cortex (EC) plays a pivotal role in epileptogenesis and seizures. EC expresses high density of serotonergic receptors, especially 5-HT3 receptors. Cognitive impairment is common among people with epilepsy. The present study investigated the role of 5-HT3 receptor on the severity of seizures and learning and memory impairment by electrical kindling of amygdala in rats. The amygdala kindling was conducted in a chronic kindling manner in male Wistar rats. In fully kindled animals, ramosetron (as a potent and selective 5-HT3 receptor antagonist) was microinjected unilaterally (ad doses of 1, 10 or 100 µg/0.5 µl) into the EC 5 min before the novel object recognition (NOR) and Y-maze tests or kindling stimulations. Applying ramosetron at the concentration of 100 μg/0.5 µl (but not at 1 and 10 µg/0.5 µl) reduced afterdischarge (AD) duration and increased stage 4 latency in the kindled rats. Moreover, the obtained data from the NOR test showed that treatment by ramosetron (10 and 100 µg/0.5 µl) increased the discrimination index in the fully kindled animals. Microinjection of ramosetron (10 and 100 µg/0.5 µl) in fully kindled animals reversed the kindling induced changes in the percentage of spontaneous alternation in Y-maze task. The findings demonstrated an anticonvulsant role for a selective 5-HT3 receptor antagonist microinjected into the EC, therefore, suggesting an excitatory role for the EC 5-HT3 receptors in the amygdala kindling model of epilepsy. This anticonvulsive effect was accompanied with a restoring effect on cognitive behavior in NOR and Y-maze tests. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Spinal anesthesia (SA) has many advantages in lower segment caesarean section (LSCS), but hypotension is the main issue that can be managed in different ways. This study was conducted to know the effectiveness of three intravenous serotonin receptor antagonists (ramosetron, ondansetron, and granisetron) in the prevention of bradycardia and hypotension during LSCS under SA. Patients and Methods: A total of 160 parturients posted for LSCS under SA were enrolled in this study and divided equally into four groups. Five minutes before SA, Group R received intravenous (IV) 0.3 mg ramosetron, Group O received 4 mg ondansetron IV, Group G received 1 mg granisetron IV, and Group S received IV normal saline. All solutions were diluted with normal saline to 5 mL to blind the drugs. Heart rate (HR), systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and mean arterial pressure were recorded. The total consumption of vasopressor and side effects were recorded. Results: The decrease in mean arterial pressure and mean HR was significantly lower in group R than other groups at all intervals (P < 0.05). The incidence of hypotension was 25% in group R compared with 42.5%, 55%, and 72.5% in groups O, G, and S, respectively. Conclusion: Premedication with intravenous ramosetron significantly reduced hypotension, HR, and total vasopressor usage in LSCS parturients. Intravenous ondansetron and granisetron had lesser effects than ramosetron.

Objective : This prospective, randomized, double-blinded trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of prophylactic ramosetron administration against postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in patients undergoing microvascular decompression (MVD). Methods : In this study, 100 patients undergoing MVD were randomly allocated to the control (normal saline, 2 mL) or ramosetron (ramosetron, 0.3 mg) groups at the end of surgery. The incidence and severity of PONV, need for rescue antiemetics, patient satisfaction score, duration of hospital stay, and the occurrence of adverse events were evaluated 48 hours post-surgery. Results : Data obtained from 97 patients were included in the final analysis. The incidence of PONV was significantly lower in the ramosetron group than in the control group throughout the 48-hour postoperative period (29.2% vs. 51.0%, p=0.028). A similar trend was observed with regard to PONV severity (p=0.041). The need for rescue antiemetics, satisfaction score, duration of hospital stays, and the occurrence of adverse events did not significantly differ between the groups. Conclusion : Prophylactic ramosetron administration reduced the incidence and severity of PONV in patients undergoing MVD without causing serious adverse events. Thus, ramosetron use may improve patient recovery following MVD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To investigate the effect of ramosetron after gynecological laparoscopic surgery on the recovery of bowel function. Methods: A prospective randomized controlled trial conducted at Kyung Hee University hospital, South Korea, from August 2016 to September 2017. Patients were randomized to receive either 10 mg dexamethasone before induction of anesthesia (control group C), followed by intravenous administration of patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) or 2 ml normal saline before induction of anesthesia and 0.6 mg ramosetron (study group R) administered with IV-PCA. Results: A total of 88 patients were enrolled. Times to first flatus (group C 23.98 ± 6.31 vs. group R 27.14 ± 9.56 h; P = 0.148) and first defecation (group C 36.16 ± 16.04 vs. group R 43.41 ± 20.01 h; P = 0.138) showed no statistically significant differences. No significant differences were observed in the frequency of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and demand for additional analgesics. Multiple linear regression for analysis of factors affecting time to first flatus revealed no significant results. Conclusion: Ramosetron did not delay bowel movement recovery after gynecologic laparoscopic surgery and was as effective as dexamethasone in regulating PONV. Ramosetron can be used with IV- PCA without concerns about delay in recovery of bowel function. Clini calTr ials.gov registration number: NCT02849483. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) continues to be common complication of anesthesia and surgery in spite of availability of so many antiemetic drugs and regimens for prevention. This study compared Ramosetron and Levosulpiride in terms of efficacy for PONV prevention after laparoscopic surgery. Aim: To compare the efficacy of intravenous (i.v.) Levosulpiride 25 mg with i.v. Ramosetron 0.3 mg in preventing PONV. Setting: S. D. M. College of Medical Sciences and Hospital, Sattur, Dharwad from November 2018 to June 2020. Design: It is a prospective randomized double-blind study. Statistical Analysis: All the data were collected, tabulated, and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Data were analyzed using IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS 22.0 Evaluation version). Unpaired sample t-test and Chi-square test have been used for the quantitative and qualitative data, respectively. A P value of 0.05 was considered statistically insignificant. Materials and Methods: This prospective randomized, double-blind study was conducted in 200 patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery falling under the inclusion criteria are numbered and every nth patient selected by systemic random sampling procedure and allocated into two groups of 100 each, group Levosulpiride (Group L) and group Ramosetron (group R) study drugs givenwithin 30 min induction of anesthesia. Group L will receive LEVOSULPIRIDE 25 mg i.v. Group R will receive RAMOSETRON 0.3 mg i.v. Results: The incidence of vomiting in the Levosulpiride group and in the Ramosetron groupduring 0-4 h (20% vs. 30%, P = 0.1110), 4-8 h (4% vs. 5%, P = 0.7450), 8-12 h (5% vs. 4% P = 0.7210) and 12-24 h (0% vs. 0%). The incidence of nausea and overall PONV and the use of rescue antiemetic was not significantly different during all time intervals. The severity of nausea was not different between the two groups. Difference in the efficacy of Levosulpiride and Ramosetron was statistically insignificant (P > 0.05) in the prevention of PONV. Conclusion: Levosulpiride 25 mg or Ramosetron 0.3 mg given intravenously to prevent PONV inpatients undergoing elective laparoscopic surgery under general anesthesia are equally effective in controlling PONV. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aims: For prevention of Postoperative nausea vomiting (PONV) in laparoscopic surgery, ramosetron is a selective 5-HT3 receptor antagonist with higher receptor affinity and slow dissociation than ondansetron. We compared these 2 drugs with propofol which has also shown antiemetic properties.The aim was to study ondansetron, ramosetron, and propofol with respect to incidence of PONV, its severity and the need for rescue antiemetic along with the side effects. Prospective, randomized, double blind study. Material and Methods: We compared antiemetic properties of ondansetron (4 mg i.v; n = 40) and ramosetron (0.3 mg i.v; n = 40) with propofol (0.5 mg/kg i.v; n = 40) on 120 ASA I/II patients scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The side effects associated with study drugs, time to recovery from anesthesia, readiness for PACU discharge and patient satisfaction was also compared. Qualitative data variables are expressed by using frequency and percentage and quantitative data variables are expressed by using mean and SD. Quantitative data variables were compared using ANOVA test and others were compared by post hoc ANOVA Tukey's test. Results: Incidence of vomiting and need for rescue antiemetic was lowest with Ramosetron and highest in Propofol group. Time to recovery was more in Propofol group which was statistically significant. Readiness for PACU discharge was comparable in all the three groups. Conclusion: Subhypnotic dose of propofol requires more rescue antiemetic than Ondansetron and Ramosetron because of its short duration of action. Between Ondansetron and Ramosetron the latter is more effective in PONV prevention.

Background: This study was performed to evaluate the effectiveness of ramosetron orally disintegrating tablets (ODTs) in preventing post-discharge nausea and/or vomiting (PDNV) in female patients following outpatient surgery under general anesthesia. Methods: This multicenter randomized study included three South Korean tertiary hospitals. Before surgery, 138 patients were randomly allocated into two groups. In the ramosetron group, ramosetron ODT 0.1 mg was administered after discharge in the morning of postoperative days 1 and 2. Metoclopramide 10 mg was administered as a rescue antiemetic (capped at 30 mg per day). In the control group, patients were administered only metoclopramide 10 mg when nausea and/or vomiting occurred. The primary outcome was the incidence of nausea during 24 h after discharge. Results: We found significant differences in the incidence (13% vs. 33%, P = 0.008) and severity (P = 0.011) of nausea between the ramosetron and the control groups during 24 h after discharge. In addition, the rate of rescue antiemetic (metoclopramide) administration during 24 h after discharge was lower in the ramosetron group (6%) than in the control group (18%) (P = 0.033). Patient satisfaction score was higher in the ramosetron group than in the control group (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Ramosetron ODT reduces the incidence and severity of postoperative nausea after discharge during the first 24 h and may be a valuable option for the prevention of PDNV in female patients after day surgery under general anesthesia. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04297293. Registered on 05 March 2020 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ramosetron, often used to prevent postoperative nausea and vomiting, might cause heart-rate-corrected (QTc) interval prolongation, as might robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP), which requires a steep Trendelenburg position and CO2 pneumoperitoneum. This study aimed to determine how ramosetron administration affects the QTc interval in patients treated with RALP. Fifty-six subjects were randomly assigned to ramosetron (n = 28) or control (n = 28) groups. The ramosetron group received 0.3 mg of ramosetron after anesthetic induction, whereas the control group received normal saline. The QTc interval was measured before and after induction; after 5, 30, and 60 min of being placed in the Trendelenburg position; immediately after being returned to a supine position; and at the end of surgery. Linear mixed models were used to compare QT intervals between groups. QTc intervals did not differ significantly between groups over time (Pgroup×time = 0.111). However, they increased significantly in both groups after placement in the Trendelenburg position compared with before induction (Ptime < 0.001). This increase in QTc continued until the end of surgery in both groups. Based on these findings, ramosetron can be safely administered for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting among patients undergoing RALP. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is a painful procedure, and treatment of emetic events associated with drugs used in the current multimodal pain management remains challenging. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of ramosetron or ondansetron to relieve postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and pain after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Methods In total, 122 consecutive patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were randomly allocated into three groups: ramosetron group (n = 39), ondansetron group (n = 43), and control group (n = 40). Then, 0.3 mg of ramosetron or 8 mg of ondansetron was administered intravenously at the end of surgery according to group. All patients received general anesthesia and multimodal pain management protocol including preemptive analgesic medication, fentanyl-based intravenous patient-controlled analgesia, and postoperative analgesic medication. Incidence of emetic events, rescue antiemetic requirements (10 mg of metoclopramide, IV), complete response, pain level, and side effects were recorded in three periods: 0–6, 6–24, and 24–48 h postoperatively. The severity of nausea and pain was evaluated using a visual analog scale. Results The ramosetron group tended to have a lower incidence and severity of nausea during the 6- to 24-h postoperative period and fewer rescue antiemetic drug requirements during the 0- to 48-h period than the control group, showing statistical significance. Additionally, the frequency of complete response of the ramosetron and ondansetron groups was significantly higher than that of the control group. No difference was found among the groups in the pain level except during the 0- to 6-h period. The two groups have a higher complete response during the 6- to 24-h period than the control group. Conclusions Ramosetron use led to a lower incidence, mild severity of nausea, and reduced use of rescue antiemetic drug after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair during the 6- to 24-h postoperative period than the control. Level of evidence Level I, randomized controlled trials, treatment study

Jingsheng Xia,1 Peng Chen2 1Department of Pharmacy, Wuhan Third Hospital, Tongren Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430060, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Pharmacy, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430060, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence: Jingsheng XiaDepartment of Pharmacy, Wuhan Third Hospital, Tongren Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430060, People’s Republic of ChinaEmail 461981818@qq.comBackground: Combination antiemetic therapy has become a common practice for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). The aim of the present study was to evaluate the stability and compatibility of ramosetron hydrochloride and midazolam in 0.9% sodium chloride injection when stored at 4°C and 25°C for up to 14 days.Methods: Admixtures were assessed initially and for 14 days after preparation in polyolefin bags and glass bottles using 0.9% sodium chloride injection as the diluent and stored at 4°C or 25°C. The initial concentrations were 0.3 mg/100 mL ramosetron hydrochloride and 0.5 mg/100 mL midazolam hydrochloride. For all samples, the compatibility parameters (including precipitation, cloudiness, discoloration and pH values) were evaluated. Chemical stability was also determined using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis.Results: After a 14-day period of storage at 4°C or 25°C, the percent of the initial concentration of ramosetron hydrochloride and midazolam hydrochloride in the various solutions were maintained at a minimum of 97%. All of the mixtures remained clear and colourless throughout the observation period, and no colour change or precipitation was observed.Conclusion: The results indicate that admixtures of 0.3 mg/100 mL ramosetron hydrochloride and 0.5 mg/100 mL midazolam hydrochloride in normal saline were stable for 14 days at 4°C or 25°C when packaged in polyolefin bags or glass bottles and protected from light.Keywords: ramosetron, midazolam, drug stability, postoperative nausea and vomiting

Background: One of the most troublesome complications after middle-ear surgeries has been postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). A notable decrease in PONV has been observed with the use of 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 receptor antagonists and glucocorticoids. Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the combination of intravenous methylprednisolone and ondansetron with ramosetron alone in preventing PONV in patients undergoing middle-ear surgeries. Settings and Design: This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind study that comprised sixty patients in the age group of 18–60 years belonging to the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification I or II and undergoing middle-ear surgery. Materials and Methods: With the help of computer-generated randomization table, sixty patients in the age group of 18–60 years belonging to ASA physical status classification I or II and undergoing middle-ear surgery were randomly allotted to receive a combination of methylprednisolone 40 mg (given at the beginning of surgery) and ondansetron 4 mg (given near the end of surgery) (Group MO, n = 30) or ramosetron 0.3 mg (near the end of surgery) (Group R, n = 30). In both the groups, the incidence of PONV was studied. Statistical Analysis: Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test was utilized to analogize the categorical variables. Independent t-test was utilized to analogize the continuous variables. Results: In the first 2 h after the surgery, the difference between the two groups regarding the incidence of PONV was insignificant. Between 2 h and 24 h, the incidence of nausea was lowered significantly in the group MO compared to the group R (P = 0.01). Between 24 h and 48 h, the incidence of nausea was more in group R compared to the combination therapy group, which was statistically significant. Conclusion: The combination therapy is better than ramosetron alone for the prevention of PONV after middle-ear surgery. Therefore, we advocate a combination of methylprednisolone and ondansetron for prophylaxis for PONV in middle-ear surgeries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVE: Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is caused by injuries from fracture after trauma and orthopaedic surgical procedures in the hind limbs. The symptoms of CRPS include warmth, pain, allodynia, and hyperalgesia. It is known that 5-hydroxytryptamine 3 (5-HT3) receptors contribute to hyperalgesia, but their role has not yet been fully elucidated. This study investigated the mechanism of pain relief when a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist was administered in a CRPS animal model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To establish a CRPS animal model, 10-week-old Sprague-Dawley rats were used in the experiment. On the fourth week post tibial fracture surgery, we performed the von Frey test to measure mechanical allodynia. After performing behavioural tests, we collected blood and tissue samples after sacrificing the animals. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and western blot were also performed. RESULTS: The experimental tibia fracture model-induced CRPS animals elicited increased 5-HT3 receptor expression, and the 5-HT transporter was decreased in the brain stem after 4 weeks of surgical intervention. Additionally, in CRPS-induced animals, both the concentration of substance P and the level of interleukin 6 were increased peripherally and centrally. Treatment with the 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, ramosetron, exerted an analgesic effect in the paw withdrawal test and was dependent on the attenuation of the 5-HT3 receptor population with inflammatory pain mediators. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that treatment with the 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, ramosetron, in experimental CRPS animal models alleviated pain-related behaviours and may be a new therapeutic option or potential therapeutic agent for patients with CRPS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aims: For prevention of Postoperative nausea vomiting (PONV) in laparoscopic surgery, ramosetron is a selective 5-HT3 receptor antagonist with higher receptor affinity and slow dissociation than ondansetron. We compared these 2 drugs with propofol which has also shown antiemetic properties.The aim was to study ondansetron, ramosetron, and propofol with respect to incidence of PONV, its severity and the need for rescue antiemetic along with the side effects. Prospective, randomized, double blind study. Material and Methods: We compared antiemetic properties of ondansetron (4 mg i.v; n = 40) and ramosetron (0.3 mg i.v; n = 40) with propofol (0.5 mg/kg i.v; n = 40) on 120 ASA I/II patients scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The side effects associated with study drugs, time to recovery from anesthesia, readiness for PACU discharge and patient satisfaction was also compared. Qualitative data variables are expressed by using frequency and percentage and quantitative data variables are expressed by using mean and SD. Quantitative data variables were compared using ANOVA test and others were compared by post hoc ANOVA Tukey's test. Results: Incidence of vomiting and need for rescue antiemetic was lowest with Ramosetron and highest in Propofol group. Time to recovery was more in Propofol group which was statistically significant. Readiness for PACU discharge was comparable in all the three groups. Conclusion: Subhypnotic dose of propofol requires more rescue antiemetic than Ondansetron and Ramosetron because of its short duration of action. Between Ondansetron and Ramosetron the latter is more effective in PONV prevention. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of scheduled ramosetron injections for controlling postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) after single-port access total laparoscopic hysterectomy (SPA-TLH).MethodsNinety patients who underwent SPA-TLH at the Korean National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital between June 2013 and July 2014 were enrolled in this prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. The patients were divided into 2 groups as follows: the ramosetron group (0.3 mg intravenously [IV]; n=45) and the placebo group (normal saline IV; n=45). Both groups received their respective injections 12 and 24 hours post surgery. The incidence and severity of PONV (numerical rating scale, 0–10), and the use of rescue antiemetics post surgery were evaluated.ResultsDemographic and perioperative statistically significant differences were not observed between the 2 groups. The incidence of PONV in the ramosetron and placebo groups was 46.7% and 51.1%, respectively (P=0.51). We found significant differences in the severity of PONV between the 24- to 48-hour postoperative periods in both groups (ramosetron group, P=0.04 and placebo group, P=0.03). The use of rescue antiemetics was significantly lower in the ramosetron group than in the placebo group (P=0.02).ConclusionAfter general anesthesia, scheduled injections of ramosetron 12 and 24 hours after SPA-TLH reduced the severity of PONV and the use of rescue antiemetics. Administration of ramosetron can be considered not only immediately after SPA-TLH but also during the first 24-hour recovery period.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT 02011659

Background Because of its efficacy and safety, polyethylene glycol (PEG) is generally used to prepare for colonoscopy. However, the side effects of PEG, including nausea, vomiting, abdominal discomfort, pain, and general weakness, tend to decrease patient compliance and satisfaction. The aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of PEG with 0.1 mg ramosetron on colonoscopy patients who had difficulty taking PEG due to side effects or large volume. Methods From January to August in 2012, 28 patients who visited Yeungnam University hospital for a colonoscopy were prospectively enrolled. All enrolled patients were previous history underwent colonoscopy using PEG only in our hospital. The efficacy and safety of ramosetron were assessed through the use of a questionnaire, and compared previous bowel preparation. Results Compared to previous examination, the patients using the ramosetron reported less nausea, vomiting, abdominal discomfort, and abdominal pain, as well as a higher degree of compliance and satisfaction of the patient. There were no side effects reported with the use of ramosetron. However, overall bowel preparation quality was not better than the previous examination. Conclusion In case of the use of ramosetron in combination with PEG for bowel preparation, patients experienced a higher rate of compliance and tolerance. Looking forward, ramosetron may become an option of pretreatment for bowel preparation.