Search

Transportation agencies periodically conduct signal retiming (i.e., optimization) to ensure efficient signal operations. Previous studies introduced the notion of the “resonant cycle length” (RCL), which is based on the premise that a good progression of traffic on the corridor mainline for various volume fluctuations can be achieved with an appropriate value of cycle lengths, where all other signal timing parameters (splits, offsets and phase sequences) remain unaltered. Several follow-up studies brought many inconsistencies in the previously introduced concept. For instance, authors would investigate the existence of the RCL by evaluating the performance of signal timing plans for not only coordinated movements (side streets and coordinated movements together), but would optimize all signal timing parameters (not only cycle lengths) while investigating. This study sheds light on the RCL concept and highlights the importance of all signal timing parameters for signal performance. In addition, we introduce a concept called the resonant signal timing plan (RSTP) as a refinement for the RCL, which represents a combination of signal timing parameters that (unaltered) retain an acceptable performance for a variety of traffic conditions. Results show that different sets of signal timing parameters cause plans to be resonant depending on the evaluation type.

Transportation agencies periodically conduct signal retiming (i.e., optimization) to ensure efficient signal operations. Previous studies introduced the notion of the "resonant cycle length" (RCL), which is based on the premise that a good progression of traffic on the corridor mainline for various volume fluctuations can be achieved with an appropriate value of cycle lengths, where all other signal timing parameters (splits, offsets and phase sequences) remain unaltered. Several follow-up studies brought many inconsistencies in the previously introduced concept. For instance, authors would investigate the existence of the RCL by evaluating the performance of signal timing plans for not only coordinated movements (side streets and coordinated movements together), but would optimize all signal timing parameters (not only cycle lengths) while investigating. This study sheds light on the RCL concept and highlights the importance of all signal timing parameters for signal performance. In addition, we introduce a concept called the resonant signal timing plan (RSTP) as a refinement for the RCL, which represents a combination of signal timing parameters that (unaltered) retain an acceptable performance for a variety of traffic conditions. Results show that different sets of signal timing parameters cause plans to be resonant depending on the evaluation type. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]