Search

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether different radiographic clusters of adult spinal deformity identified using artificial intelligence-based clustering are associated with distinct surgical outcomes. METHODS: Patients were classified based on the results of a previously conducted analysis that examined clusters of deformity, including Moderate Sagittal (Mod Sag), Severe Sagittal (Sev Sag), Coronal, and Hyper-Thoracic Kyphosis (Hyper-TK). The surgical data, HRQOL, and complication outcomes of these clusters were then compared. RESULTS: The final analysis included 1062 patients. Similar to published results on a different patient sample, Mod Sag and Sev Sag patients were older, more likely to have a history of previous spine surgery, and more disabled. By 2-year, all clusters improved in HRQOL and reached a similar rate of minimal clinically important difference (MCID).The Sev Sag cluster had the highest rate major complications (53% vs 34-40%), and complications leading to reoperation (29% vs 17-23%), implant failures (20% vs 8-11%), and operative complications (27% vs 10-17%). Coronal patients had the highest rate of pulmonary complications (9% vs 3-6%) but the lowest rate of X-ray imbalance (10% vs 19-21%). No significant differences were found in neurological complications, infection rate, gastrointestinal, or cardiac events (all P > .1). Kaplan-Meier survival curves demonstrated a lower time to first complications for the Sev Sag cluster. CONCLUSIONS: All clusters of adult spinal deformity benefit similarly from surgery as they all achieved similar rates of MCID. Although the rates of complications varied among the clusters, the types of complications were not significantly different.

Anterior Column Realignment (ACR) was introduced to serve as a powerful segmental kyphosis correction technique in minimally invasive Adult Spinal Deformity (ASD) surgery. Releasing the Anterior Longitudinal Ligament (ALL) and annulus allows opening of the disc space to accommodate hyperlordotic cages. The overall safety and efficacy of ACR has been difficult to determine due to the heterogenicity of surgical techniques, complications reporting, and a paucity of published studies leading to preliminary and controversial conclusions. To determine the efficacy and complications rates associated with ACR. Systematic review. We queried the MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and EMBASE databases for all literature related to ACR procedure with a publication cutoff start date of January 1, 2010. This systematic review was performed utilizing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. nonEnglish, nonhuman, case reports and review article publications were excluded. A total of 298 studies were identified. Following screening of title, abstract, and full text, 16 articles were included in the review with a total 756 patients. All the studies included in this systematic review were retrospective case series with a level of evidence IV. Ten studies reported ACR-related complications, with an average rate of 27.2%. The rate of reoperations was reported in 5 studies, for which the average reoperation rate was 9.5%. Cage Subsidence (CS) occurred in 13.7%, Proximal Junctional Kyphosis (PJK) in 12.2%, neurologic injury in 7.3%, and Proximal Junctional Failure (PJF) in 2.7%. The vascular injury rate was 0.5%, with bowel perforation and ureteric injury occurring in 0.2%. For the Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) and radiological outcome analysis we excluded studies with less than 12 months follow up leaving 8 studies eligible for the analysis. There was a significant improvement of both local Motion Segment Angle (MSA) and Intra Discal Angle (IDA) with a mean segmental correction of 20° lordosis in the 3 studies that reported these parameters. Based on the limited data available in this systematic review, the ACR technique has significant ability to restore and, when needed, correct the local segmental intervertebral angulation and thereby influencing the overall regional and global sagittal alignment. The associated risk of vascular, bowel, and nerve injury did not seem to be significantly higher in this review than other alternative lumbar interbody fusion techniques. Additional higher quality studies, including a consensus for reporting complications is required to reach definitive conclusions regarding its possible associated risks. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) can be combined with posterior column osteotomies (PCOs) to maximize lordotic correction. This study compares radiographic changes in regional and segmental lordosis in patients undergoing ALIF with and without PCOs. Patients >18 years old who underwent ALIF at 1 or 2 segments at a single institution (January 2014–July 2020) were included. Preoperative and postoperative radiographic parameters were determined, and a propensity-matched analysis was performed. Ninety-nine patients (53 [54%] men) underwent ALIF at 129 levels (mean [SD], 1.3 [0.46] levels; median [range] age, 61 [32–83] years). PCOs were performed in 13 (13%) patients at 19 (15%) segments. PCOs included 13 Schwab grade 1 and 6 grade 2 osteotomies. All measures, including lumbar lordosis, segmental lordosis, disc angle, and neural foramen height, increased significantly after surgery (P ≤ 0.003). In the propensity-matched analysis, PCO was associated with greater increases in lumbar lordosis (14.9° vs. 8.2°, P = 0.02), segmental lordosis (14.0° vs. 9.6°, P = 0.03), and disc angle (15.0° vs. 10.2°, P = 0.046). The change in disc angle more closely approximated the inherent lordosis of the cage when PCO was performed (94% vs. 62%, P = 0.004). Performing PCOs and ALIFs significantly increased the radiographic correction of overall and segmental lordosis in the selected patient cohort. The disc angle achieved with ALIF without PCOs was approximately 60% of the cage lordosis. The addition of PCO allowed for greater segmental compression, enabling the disc angle to reach nearly 100% of the inherent interbody cage lordosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: Deep learning (DL) algorithms can be used for automated analysis of medical imaging. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of an innovative, fully automated DL algorithm for analysis of sagittal balance in adult spinal deformity (ASD). Material and methods: Sagittal balance (sacral slope, pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence, lumbar lordosis and sagittal vertical axis) was evaluated in 141 preoperative and postoperative radiographs of patients with ASD. The DL, landmark-based measurements, were compared with the ground truth values from validated manual measurements. Results: The DL algorithm showed an excellent consistency with the ground truth measurements. The intra-class correlation coefficient between the DL and ground truth measurements was 0.71–0.99 for preoperative and 0.72–0.96 for postoperative measurements. The DL detection rate was 91.5% and 84% for preoperative and postoperative images, respectively. Conclusion: This is the first study evaluating a complete automated DL algorithm for analysis of sagittal balance with high accuracy for all evaluated parameters. The excellent accuracy in the challenging pathology of ASD with long construct instrumentation demonstrates the eligibility and possibility for implementation in clinical routine. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design: This was a retrospective cohort radiographic study. Objective: To determine the age- and gender-related normative values and correlation of cervical sagittal parameters in asymptomatic Chinese adults, and to explore the changes and compensating mechanisms across different age groups. Methods: The asymptomatic subjects were divided into 6 groups according to age and then one-way analysis of variance was used to compare the multiple sets of cervical sagittal parameters among the different age groups. Independent t-tests were performed to compare the sagittal parameters among different gender and different cervical spine alignments. Relationships between each parameter were tested by Pearson's correlation. Linear regression analysis based on T1 slope (T1S) and C2 slope (C2S) was used to provide an equation to predict normal cervical alignment. Results: Mean values of each cervical sagittal parameter were presented based on age and gender. There were positive correlations between age and cervical lordosis (CL) (r = -.278, P <.001), T1S (r =.271, P <.001), cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA) (r =.218, P <.001), C2-C4 Cobb angle (r = -.283, P <.001), horacic inlet angle (TIA) (r =.443, P <.001), and neck tilt (NT) (r =.354, P <.001). Older groups (aged >50 years) had greater T1 Slope, C2S, and TIA. The C2-C4 Cobb angle maintained a steadily increasing trend and significantly increased in the older adult groups (P <.05), while the C5-C7 Cobb angle was relatively constant. Mean values of parameters were larger in males (P >.05). Linear regression analysis indicated a strong association between T1S and CL (R2 =.551, standard error 1.16°), T1S and C5-7 (R2 =.372; P <.001), and C2S and C2-4 (R2 =.309; P <.001). Conclusions: Normative values of cervical sagittal parameters vary by age and sex. The CL, cSVA, and T1S, C2-4 Cobb angle changed with increasing age, and it can influence the recruitment of compensation mechanism. Normative CL of Chinese adults was predicted by the equation CL = T1S-14.7° ± 1.2°, which could serve as a reference when planning for cervical surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Traditional thoracolumbosacral orthosis fabrication involves truncal casting (traditionally fabricated [TF] Wilmington brace [WB]), whereas the newer Chêneau-style brace (computer-aided design [CAD]) involves three-dimensional truncal scanning technology. We sought to evaluate how these two brace styles affect the position of the spine in the coronal and sagittal plane. Materials and Methods: Inclusion criteria included adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated with WB or CAD Chêneau-style brace, major curve Cobb angle 20°–45°, age 10–15 years, Risser 0–3, and radiographs (prebrace and in-brace posteroanterior and lateral). Analysis included 28 CAD Chêneau-style braces and 56 WB patients. Results: There was no difference between groups regarding age, sex, body mass index, major curve location, major curve degree, sagittal plane curvature, and pelvic parameters. In-brace analysis demonstrated decreased sagittal plane curvatures and increased T1 pelvic angle in both groups; both had significantly reduced major curve correction. Coronal plane major curve correction ratio of the two groups was similar (P = 0.236). In the CAD Chêneau-style brace group, the thoracolumbar junction became more kyphotic (P = 0.03). In the WB group, both coronal balance and thoracic trunk shift were leftward (P = 0.001). Both groups had a significant increase in T1 pelvic angle, but this increase was higher in the CAD Chêneau-style brace group (P = 0.045). Conclusions: Both braces exert a flattening effect on the spine and positive global sagittal balance. Coronal plane major curve correction was similar for both groups. Coronal plane trunk shift and C7 coronal balance were significantly changed leftward after WB application. Kyphotic thoracolumbar transition and forward tilt of the spine (T1 pelvic angle) were significantly greater in CAD Chêneau-style brace than WB. Clinical Relevance: A Chêneau-style brace fabricated with CAD/computer-aided manufacturing technology can produce a brace comparable to one fabricated by traditional methods using cast molding. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To investigate the improvement of spinopelvic parameters and therapeutic efficacy in the treatment of complex degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (CDLS) after oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). From January 2018 to December 2020, 71 patients with CDLS underwent OLIF or TLIF at the same hospital: 31 in the OLIF group and 40 in the TLIF group. The spinopelvic parameters, perioperative data, and clinical outcomes were elected and compared between the 2 groups. There were no statistic differences in demographic perioperative complication rates and preoperative spinopelvic parameters between the two groups. OLIF group showed lower serum C-reactive protein in the early postoperative stage, shorter length of stay, less estimated blood loss and larger slippage correction rate (88.05 vs. 62.37%) (all P ＜ 0.05). There was no significant difference in the visual analog scale and Oswestry disability index scores before operation and three and six months after surgery, but OLIF group was better in the long-term with visual analog scale and Oswestry disability index (1.7/13.2 vs. 2.3/16.5). And it was significantly different in the lumbar lordosis angle, segmental lordosis angle, pelvic tilt, sacral slope (46.0°/9.3°/18.2°/35.9° vs. 40.4°/7.2°/23.9°/31.1°), and sagittal vertical axis (21.6 vs. 31.7mm) after surgery between OLIF and TLIF groups (all P ＜ 0.05). In the therapy of CDLS, OLIF can better reduce pelvic tilt, L1 axis S1 distance, and sagittal vertical axis, and increase lumbar lordosis angle and sacral slope, showing advantages over TLIF in improving and maintaining spinopelvic parameters. Although there was no difference in complication rates between OLIF and TLIF, OLIF was more minimally invasive, had less tissue damage, had faster recovery, and had better long-term outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction Surgical methods for osteoporotic burst vertebral body fracture repair have their advantages and shortcomings. The use of circumferential stabilization and corrective vertebrotomies in elderly patients is highly invasive and carries great surgical risk. On the other hand, minimally invasive methods lead to recurrence of the deformity. Thus, in the treatment of patients with such pathology, it is necessary to choose a surgical method that allows achieving optimal results. Purpose of the work was to compare the results of surgical treatment for osteoporotic burst fractures in thoracolumbar vertebral bodies using the developed method and methods of circular and hybrid stabilization based on clinical and radiological criteria. Materials and methods The study was retrospective. Three groups of patients were formed according to the type of surgical intervention. Inclusion criteria were patients with primary osteoporosis who did not receive osteotropic therapy before surgery, with osteoporotic fractures (type OF3 and OF4) of the vertebral bodies of the thoracolumbar location (Th10–L2). The follow-up period was 12 months. The following criteria were assessed: the amount of kyphosis correction (according to the Cobb method), the amount of residual postoperative kyphotic deformity, as well as its recurrence in the long-term postoperative period; sagittal balance of the torso (Barrey index), subjective evaluation of the patient’s condition (VAS). Quality of life assessment was not performed. Results There were no statistically significant differences in the dynamics of sagittal balance during the follow‑up period between the groups (p > 0.99). There was no difference between groups in clinical outcomes (VAS) at follow-up (p > 0.05). A statistically significant difference in the magnitude of kyphotic deformity and its correction in the specified postoperative periods was revealed between the hybrid fixation groups and the corrective vertebrotomy group. No difference was found with the circular stabilization group. Discussion Due to the high risks of poor outcomes of anterior spinal fusion, in particular, implant subsidence, to avoid anterior spinal fusion, we used a method of focal kyphosis correction and posterior spinal fusion with autologous bone. The method proposed by the authors for the correction of focal kyphotic deformity in the treatment of patients with osteoporotic burst fractures of the vertebral bodies combines satisfactory correction of focal kyphosis with minimal surgical invasiveness, which reduces the risks of complications and poor outcomes. The proposed method may also be combined with hybrid fixation. Conclusion The developed method for focal kyphotic deformity correction in the treatment of osteoporotic burst fractures of vertebral bodies provides satisfactory correction of focal kyphosis, reduces the risks of complications and poor outcomes in comparison with circular and hybrid stabilization.

Study Design. Retrospective cohort. Objective. Examine the relationship between compensatory pelvic retroversion, positive sagittal imbalance (measured by C2 tilt), and the C2 pelvic angle (C2PA) in patients before long spinal fusions; and to determine the association between changes in C2PA and pelvic tilt (PT) following long spinal fusions. Background. Adult spinal deformity surgical goals often include a PT target, yet patients frequently demonstrate persistent compensatory pelvic retroversion following surgery. Methods. Adults above 18 years old undergoing long spinal fusions (> 4 levels) with standing preoperative and postoperative radiographs were included. To examine drivers of preoperative sagittal balance, regression models were fit to estimate the association between preoperative C2PA and pelvic incidence with preoperative PT and C2 tilt. To predict postoperative change in PT, multivariable regression was used to estimate change in PT, adjusting for change in C2PA and preoperative C2 tilt. Results. Among the 80 patients identified, the median age was 61 (IQR: 45-72) and 46 (58%) were female. The median number of levels fused was 10 (IQR: 8-13) and 55 (69%) were instrumented to the sacrum/pelvis. Preoperative C2PA had a significant nonlinear association with preoperative PT (r2=0.81, P<0.001) and preoperative C2 tilt (r2= 0.41, P= 0.002). Postoperative change in PT was strongly associated with change in C2PA (β=0.81; P<0.001) and preoperative C2 tilt (β= 0.55; P< 0.001). Conclusions. Following long spinal fusions, change in PT (or lack thereof) can be reliably predicted based on change in C2PA and preoperative C2 tilt. In patients with normal preoperative C2 tilt, the change in C2PA is nearly equivalent to the change in PT, but in patients with more positive C2 tilt (sagittal imbalance), a greater change in C2PA will be required to achieve an equivalent change in PT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Atlantoaxial instability is the most common cervical instability in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Its course may differ in different patients and may have different degrees of severity and symptoms. Methods: There are a number of studies on systemic factors associated with the development of this instability, but there are few publications in the scientific literature on the influence of biomechanical factors on the development of cervical instability. One of the areas that allows the study of biomechanical factors influencing spine pathologies is the analysis of sagittal balance using radiological parameters. The study of radiological parameters of sagittal balance has contributed to understanding the pathology of selected spine diseases and is currently an indispensable tool in planning surgical treatment. Results: The presented study, conducted on a group of RA patients with cervical instability, was performed to look for a relationship between C1–C2 instability and sagittal balance parameters. Conclusions: Among the examined selected parameters, a statistically relationship between C1–C2 instability and the Cobb angle C1–C7 and OD-HA parameters has been found. This confirms the need for further in-depth research on this areas. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine decrease lumbar lordosis (LL). Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) at the L5-S1 disc space improves segmental lordosis, LL, and sagittal balance. This study investigated reciprocal changes in spinopelvic alignment after L5-S1 ALIF. A retrospective chart review identified patients who underwent L5-S1 ALIF with or without posterior fixation at a single institution (November 1, 2016 to October 1, 2021). Changes in pelvic tilt, sacral slope, proximal LL (L1-L4), distal LL (L4-S1), total LL (L1-S1), segmental lordosis, pelvic incidence–LL mismatch, thoracic kyphosis, cervical lordosis, and sagittal vertical axis were measured on preoperative and postoperative radiographs. Forty-eight patients were identified. Immediate postoperative radiographs were obtained at a mean (SD) of 17 (20) days after surgery; delayed radiographs were obtained 184 (82) days after surgery. After surgery, patients had significantly decreased pelvic tilt (15.71° [7.25°] vs. 17.52° [7.67°], P = 0.003) and proximal LL (11.86° [10.67°] vs. 16.03° [10.45°], P < 0.001) and increased sacral slope (39.49° [9.27°] vs. 36.31° [10.39°], P < 0.001), LL (55.35° [13.15°] vs. 51.63° [13.38°], P = 0.001), and distal LL (43.17° [9.33°] vs. 35.80° [8.02°], P < 0.001). Segmental lordosis increased significantly at L5-S1 and decreased significantly at L2-3, L3-4, and L4-5. Lordosis distribution index increased from 72.55 (19.53) to 81.38 (22.83) (P < 0.001). L5-S1 ALIF was associated with increased L5-S1 segmental lordosis accompanied by pelvic anteversion and a reciprocal decrease in proximal LL. These changes may represent a reversal of compensatory mechanisms, suggesting an overall relaxation of spinopelvic alignment after L5-S1 ALIF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Bipedalism was a significant milestone in the evolutionary development of Homo sapiens sapiens, influencing neocortical evolution and subsequent behavioral changes. Coordinated visual and sensory inputs are crucial for posture, environmental interaction, and surgical planning, with horizontal gaze being a pivotal parameter. This narrative review aims to explore various geometric measures used to assess horizontal gaze in patients, highlighting their applications in surgical planning. A literature review was conducted in indexed databases using Mesh terms like "Cervical Vertebrae" and "Visual Fields" along with keywords such as "horizontal gaze" and "sagittal spine parameters." Among 477 initially identified articles, 41 were selected for inclusion after rigorous filtering. The most recognized method for assessing horizontal gaze is the Chin Brow Vertical Angle (CBVA), initially described in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Clinical photography is employed as a tool for CBVA calculation, while other measures like McGregor slope and Slope of the Line of Sight have been considered as alternatives to CBVA. Each method presents its unique advantages and limitations. This review highlights the need for further research into horizontal gaze measurement methods. Developing novel approaches to determine horizontal gaze can significantly enhance surgical planning and, consequently, improve patient outcomes. The ongoing exploration of these geometric measures offers promising prospects for advancing the field and optimizing patient care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The curvature of the lumbar spine plays a critical role in maintaining spinal function, stability, weight distribution, and load transfer. We have developed a mathematical model of the lumbar spine curve by introducing a novel mechanism: minimization of the elastic bending energy of the spine with respect to two biomechanical parameters: dimensionless lumbosacral spinal curvature cLS and dimensionless curvature increment along the spine CI. While most of the biomechanical studies focus on a particular segment of the spine, the distinction of the presented model is that it describes the shape of the thoracolumbar spine by considering it as a whole (non-locally) and thus includes interactions between the different spinal levels in a holistic approach. From radiographs, we have assessed standard geometrical parameters: lumbar lordosis LL, pelvic incidence PI, pelvic tilt PT, sacral slope ψ0 and sagittal balance parameter SB = sagittal vertical axis (SVA)/sacrum-bicoxofemoral distance (SFD) of 42 patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (SS) or degenerative spondylolisthesis (SL) and 21 radiologically normal subjects. SB statistically significantly correlated with model parameters cL5 (r = −0.34, p = 0.009) and −CI (r = 0.33, p = 0.012) but not with standard geometrical parameters. A statistically significant difference with sufficient statistical power between the patients and the normal groups was obtained for cLS, CI, and SB but not for standard geometrical parameters. The model provides a possibility to predict changes in the thoracolumbar spine shape in surgery planning and in assessment of different spine pathologies.

Abstract Background Lumbar spondylolysis is a bone defect in the pars interarticularis of the lumbar vertebral, which is a common cause of low back pain in youth. Although non-surgical treatment is a mainstream option, surgery is necessary for patients with persistent symptoms. Buck technique is widely used as a classical direct repair technique, but it cannot achieve reduction of low-grade spondylolisthesis and reconstruction of lumbosacral sagittal balance. We have described a novel surgical procedure based on Buck technique with temporary intersegmental pedicle screw fixation, and report a series of clinical outcomes in 5 patients to provide a reference for the clinical treatment of young lumbar spondylolysis. Methods Five young patients with symptomatic lumbar spondylolysis with a mean age of 19.20 ± 5.41 years underwent surgical treatment after an average of 7.60 ± 1.52 months of failure to respond to conservative treatment, using a new surgical procedure based on Buck technique combined with temporary intersegmental pedicle screw fixation. Results Five patients were successfully operated without serious complications such as nerve and vascular injury. The average operation time was 109.00 ± 7.42 min, the interpretative average blood loss was 148.00 ± 31.14 ml, and the average fusion time was 11.20 ± 1.64 months. All patients were followed up for 2 years after surgery, and the visual analogue score (VAS) of low back pain and Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores were significantly improved compared with those before surgery, and the Henderson’s evaluation were rated excellent or good. After the removal of the internal fixation, it was observed that temporary intersegmental fixation could repair the isthmus, reduce lumbar spondylolisthesis, and reconstruct the sagittal balance of the lumbosacral vertebrae while preserving lumbar motion and preventing intervertebral disc degeneration. Postoperative MRI indicated the Pfirrmann classification of the affected discs: 1 case from grade III to grade II, 3 cases from grade II to grade I, and 1 case remained grade II. Conclusions Buck technique supplemented by temporary intersegmental pedicle screw fixation is a highly applicable and effective method for the treatment of adolescent lumbar spondylolysis. The isthmic fusion is accurate, and temporary intersegmental fixation can effectively prevent disc degeneration and reconstruct the sagittal balance of lumbosacral vertebra.

Background: Lumbar spondylolysis is a bone defect in the pars interarticularis of the lumbar vertebral, which is a common cause of low back pain in youth. Although non-surgical treatment is a mainstream option, surgery is necessary for patients with persistent symptoms. Buck technique is widely used as a classical direct repair technique, but it cannot achieve reduction of low-grade spondylolisthesis and reconstruction of lumbosacral sagittal balance. We have described a novel surgical procedure based on Buck technique with temporary intersegmental pedicle screw fixation, and report a series of clinical outcomes in 5 patients to provide a reference for the clinical treatment of young lumbar spondylolysis. Methods: Five young patients with symptomatic lumbar spondylolysis with a mean age of 19.20 ± 5.41 years underwent surgical treatment after an average of 7.60 ± 1.52 months of failure to respond to conservative treatment, using a new surgical procedure based on Buck technique combined with temporary intersegmental pedicle screw fixation. Results: Five patients were successfully operated without serious complications such as nerve and vascular injury. The average operation time was 109.00 ± 7.42 min, the interpretative average blood loss was 148.00 ± 31.14 ml, and the average fusion time was 11.20 ± 1.64 months. All patients were followed up for 2 years after surgery, and the visual analogue score (VAS) of low back pain and Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores were significantly improved compared with those before surgery, and the Henderson's evaluation were rated excellent or good. After the removal of the internal fixation, it was observed that temporary intersegmental fixation could repair the isthmus, reduce lumbar spondylolisthesis, and reconstruct the sagittal balance of the lumbosacral vertebrae while preserving lumbar motion and preventing intervertebral disc degeneration. Postoperative MRI indicated the Pfirrmann classification of the affected discs: 1 case from grade III to grade II, 3 cases from grade II to grade I, and 1 case remained grade II. Conclusions: Buck technique supplemented by temporary intersegmental pedicle screw fixation is a highly applicable and effective method for the treatment of adolescent lumbar spondylolysis. The isthmic fusion is accurate, and temporary intersegmental fixation can effectively prevent disc degeneration and reconstruct the sagittal balance of lumbosacral vertebra. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of this study was to explore the effectiveness of a less-invasive posterior spine decompression in complex deformities. We studied the potential advantages of the microendoscopic approach, supplemented by the piezoelectric technique, to decompress both sides of the vertebral canal from a one-sided approach to preserve spine stability, ensuring adequate neural decompression. A series of 32 patients who underwent a tailored stability-preserving microendoscopic decompression for lumbar spine degenerative disease was retrospectively analyzed. The patients underwent selective bilateral decompression via a monolateral approach, without the skeletonization of the opposite side. For omo- and the contralateral decompression, we used a microscopic endoscopy-assisted approach, with the assistance of piezosurgery, to work safely near the exposed dura mater. Piezoelectric osteotomy is extremely effective in bone removal while sparing soft tissues. In all patients, adequate decompression was achieved with a high rate of spine stability preservation. The approach was essential in minimizing the opening, therefore reducing the risk of spine instability. Piezoelectric osteotomy was useful to safely perform the undercutting of the base of the spinous process for better contralateral vision and decompression without damaging the exposed dura. In all patients, a various degree of neurologic improvement was observed, with no immediate spine decompensation. In selected cases, the tailored microendoscopic monolateral approach for bilateral spine decompression with the assistance of piezosurgery is adequate and safe and shows excellent results in terms of spine decompression and stability preservation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Individuals involved in body building frequently experience sagittal imbalance, a prevalent issue observed in the spinal setting. Nevertheless, there has been a lack of adequate evidence to enhance the understanding of the matter among sports organisations, coaches, and body builders. Furthermore, individuals diagnosed with lumbar disc herniation (LDH) who participate in body building have shown a high prevalence of this issue. Therefore, microdiscectomy is a highly efficacious surgical intervention for the treatment of this medical issue. The primary objective of this research is to assess the impact of microdiscectomy on the sagittal vertical axis and sagittal balance in a cohort of 102 body builders with sagittal imbalance in Turkey. The study aims to shed light on the significant consequences for sports health in this setting. The study examined several spinopelvic characteristics, including sacral slope (SS), pelvis incidence (PI), pelvis tilt (PT), thoracic kyphosis (TK), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), and lumbar lordosis (LL). However, we only considered the degree of trunk shift to assess coronal alignment. Furthermore, the researchers also documented the "electromyography (EMG) index’’. The findings derived from this investigation demonstrated that all participants successfully regained their sagittal and coronal balances after undergoing discectomy. A notable disparity was noted in the sagittal vertical axis (SVA) across the entire spinal column, both prior to (11.7 ± 6.7) and after the surgical procedure (0.51 ± 2.7) (p < 0.050). Significant outcomes were observed in both the parameters related to the pelvic region and the spine. Following the surgical intervention, there was a notable decrease in the angle of TK, namely from 24.8 ± 11.4 to 22.1 ± 9.7 (p < 0.050). Simultaneously, the angle of LL exhibited a notable enhancement from an initial value of 25.4 ± 14.1 to 42.5 ± 10.4 following the surgical intervention (p < 0.050). However, following the surgical procedure, there was a noticeable increase in the average angle of SS, which rose from 25.7 ± 9.6 to 30.41 ± 8.8 (p < 0.050). The angle of PT exhibited a drop from 20.8 ± 7.9 to 15.7 ± 5.6, indicating statistically significant results (p < 0.050). Therefore, the findings of this study demonstrate the efficacy of micro-discectomy in ameliorating sagittal imbalance among body builders diagnosed with LDH following surgical intervention. This study has also yielded valuable insights into the sports' health implications for enhancing the overall performance of body builders. It has achieved this by implementing diverse rehabilitation protocols and ensuring the long-term monitoring of athletes with LDH who are undergoing treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The biomechanical analysis of spine and postural misalignments is important for surgical and non-surgical treatment of spinal pain. We investigated the examiner reliability of sagittal cervical alignment variables compared to the reliability and concurrent validity of computer vision algorithms used in the PostureRay® software 2024. Methods: A retrospective database of 254 lateral cervical radiographs of patients between the ages of 11 and 86 is studied. The radiographs include clearly visualized C1–C7 vertebrae that were evaluated by a human using the software. To evaluate examiner reliability and the concurrent validity of the trained CNN performance, two blinded trials of radiographic digitization were performed by an extensively trained expert user (US) clinician with a two-week interval between trials. Then, the same clinician used the trained CNN twice to reproduce the same measures within a 2-week interval on the same 254 radiographs. Measured variables included segmental angles as relative rotation angles (RRA) C1–C7, Cobb angles C2–C7, relative segmental translations (RT) C1–C7, anterior translation C2–C7, and absolute rotation angle (ARA) C2–C7. Data were remotely extracted from the examiner's PostureRay® system for data collection and sorted based on gender and stratification of degenerative changes. Reliability was assessed via intra-class correlations (ICC), root mean squared error (RMSE), and R2 values. Results: In comparing repeated measures of the CNN network to itself, perfect reliability was found for the ICC (1.0), RMSE (0), and R2 (1). The reliability of the trained expert US was in the excellent range for all variables, where 12/18 variables had ICCs ≥ 0.9 and 6/18 variables were 0.84 ≤ ICCs ≤ 0.89. Similarly, for the expert US, all R2 values were in the excellent range (R2 ≥ 0.7), and all RMSEs were small, being 0.42 ≤ RMSEs ≤ 3.27. Construct validity between the expert US and the CNN network was found to be in the excellent range with 18/18 ICCs in the excellent range (ICCs ≥ 0.8), 16/18 R2 values in the strong to excellent range (R2 ≥ 0.7), and 2/18 in the good to moderate range (R2 RT C6/C7 = 0.57 and R2 Cobb C6/C7 = 0.64. The RMSEs for expert US vs. the CNN network were small, being 0.37 ≤ RMSEs ≤ 2.89. Conclusions: A comparison of repeated measures within the computer vision CNN network and expert human found exceptional reliability and excellent construct validity when comparing the computer vision to the human observer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

(1) Background: This study assessed the relationship between cervical spine parameters taken on standing full-spine lateral radiographic images compared to sectional lateral cervical radiographs. (2) Methods: Full-spine (FS) and sectional lateral cervical (LC) radiographs from four spine treatment facilities across the USA retrospectively provided data collected on 220 persons to assess the comparison of three sagittal cervical radiographic measurements between the two views. The measures included cervical lordosis using the absolute rotation angle from C2-C7, sagittal cervical translation of C2-C7, and atlas plane angle to horizontal. Linear correlation and R2 models were used for statistical comparison of the measures for the two views. (3) Results: The mean values of the three measurements were statistically different from each other: C2-C7 translation (FS = 19.84 ± 11.98 vs. LC = 21.18 ± 11.8), C2-C7 lordosis (FS = −15.3 ± 14.63 vs. LC = −18.32 ± 13.16), and atlas plane (FS = −19.99 ± 8.88 vs. LC = −22.56 ± 8.93), where all values were p < 0.001. Weak-to-moderate-to-strong correlations existed between the full-spine and sectional lateral cervical radiographic variables. The R2 values varied based on the measurement were R2 = 0.768 (p < 0.001) for sagittal cervical translation of C2-C7 (strong), R2 = 0.613 (p < 0.001) for the absolute rotation angle C2-C7 (moderate), and R2 = 0.406 (p < 0.001) for the atlas plane line (weak). Though a linear correlation was identified, there were consistent intra-person differences between the measurements on the full spine versus sectional lateral cervical radiographic views, where the full-spine view consistently underestimated the magnitude of the variables. (4) Conclusion: Key sagittal cervical radiographic measurements on the full spine versus sectional lateral cervical radiographic views show striking intra-person differences. The findings of this study confirm that full spine versus sectional lateral cervical radiographic views provide different biomechanical magnitudes of cervical sagittal alignment, and caution should be exercised by health care providers as these are not interchangeable. We recommend the LC view for measurement of cervical sagittal alignment variables. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Spinal alignment intricately influences functional independence, particularly in older women with osteopenia experiencing mild neck and back pain. This study elucidates the interplay between spinal alignment, bone mineral density (BMD), and muscle strength in elderly women presenting with mild neck and back pain. Focusing on a cohort of 189 older women, we examined the associations among global tilt (GT), coronal and sagittal alignment, BMD, grip strength, and functional independence as gauged by the Barthel index. Our findings indicate significant associations between functional capacity and grip strength, bone density, GT, and pelvic tilt (PT). Elderly women with a Barthel Index above 80 demonstrated higher grip strength and better bone quality, reflected by less negative average T scores. These individuals also exhibited lower values of GT and PT, suggesting a better sagittal alignment compared to those with a Barthel index of 80 or below. The results highlight that deviations in GT and PT are significantly associated with decreased functional independence. These insights emphasize the importance of maintaining optimal spinal alignment and muscle strength to support functional independence in elderly women. This study underscores the potential for targeted interventions that improve postural stability and manage pain effectively in this vulnerable population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To review existing classification systems for degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS), propose a novel classification designed to better address clinically relevant radiographic and clinical features of disease, and determine the inter- and intraobserver reliability of this new system for classifying DS. Methods: The proposed classification system includes four components: 1) segmental dynamic instability, 2) location of spinal stenosis, 3) sagittal alignment, and 4) primary clinical presentation. To establish the reliability of this system, 12 observers graded 10 premarked test cases twice each. Kappa values were calculated to assess the inter- and intraobserver reliability for each of the four components separately. Results: Interobserver reliability for dynamic instability, location of stenosis, sagittal alignment, and clinical presentation was 0.94, 0.80, 0.87, and 1.00, respectively. Intraobserver reliability for dynamic instability, location of stenosis, sagittal alignment, and clinical presentation were 0.91, 0.88, 0.87, and 0.97, respectively. Conclusion: The UCSF DS classification system provides a novel framework for assessing DS based on radiographic and clinical parameters with established implications for surgical treatment. The almost perfect interobserver and intraobserver reliability observed for all components of this system demonstrates that it is simple and easy to use. In clinical practice, this classification may allow subclassification of similar patients into groups that may benefit from distinct treatment strategies, leading to the development of algorithms to help guide selection of an optimal surgical approach. Future work will focus on the clinical validation of this system, with the goal of providing for more evidence-based, standardized approaches to treatment and improved outcomes for patients with DS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: In order for a person to stand in a balanced way, the pelvis and spine must be in harmony. The aim of this study was to determine the normal ranges of spinopelvic parameters in children and adolescents in Türkiye. Material and Method: In our study, computed tomography images of 1018 healthy 7-17 year olds were examined. As a result of this examination, sacrum pubic incidence, lumbar lordosis, sacral slope, sacral kyphosis, pelvic tilt and pelvic incidence were measured. Results: The sacrum pubic incidence was 58.71±6.17°, sacral slope 37.26±5.77, lumbar lordosis 42.98±8.06°, sacral kyphosis 21.27±9.96°, pelvic incidence 46.77±6.38, and pelvic tilt 9.51±5.06°. The calculations revealed that, with age, all parameters except pelvic tilt increased significantly. A statistically significant difference was found between the age groups. Conclusion: The results of this study will contribute to the existing literature and may give clinicians insight into sagittal corrections in spine and pelvic surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Forward head posture (FHP) and altered cervical lordotic curvatures are common spine displacements often associated with neck pain and disability. Two primary categories for determining FHP exist: radiographic and postural measurements. Methods: This study investigated the correlation between the craniovertebral angle (CVA), the radiographically measured C2–C7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA), and cervical lordosis (absolute rotation angle: ARA C2–C7) in a sample of participants with chronic myofascial pain (CMP). In 120 participants, we performed both a postural measurement of the CVA and a lateral cervical radiograph, where the C2–C7 SVA and ARA C2–C7 were measured. A linear-regression R2 value to assess the correlation between the CVA, C2–C7 SVA, and ARA C2–C7 was sought. Results: A statistically significant weak linear fit was identified (Spearman's r = 0.549; R2 = 0.30, p < 0.001) between the CVA and C2–C7 SVA, having considerable variation between the two measures. A statistically significant linear fit (very weak) was identified for the lordosis ARA C2–C7 and the CVA: Spearman's r = 0.524; R2 = 0.275; p < 0.001. A value of 50° for the CVA corresponded to a value of 20 mm for the C2–C7 SVA on an X-ray. Conclusion: While the CVA and radiographic C2–C7 SVA are weakly correlated in an individual, they seem to represent different aspects of sagittal cervical balance. The CVA cannot replace radiographically measured cervical lordosis. We recommend that more emphasis be given to radiographic measures of sagittal cervical alignment than the CVA when considering patient interventions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Surgical indications for thoraco-lumbar fractures are driven both by neurological status, fractures instability and kyphotic deformity. Regarding kyphotic deformity, an angulation superior to 20° is considered by many surgeons as a surgical indication to reduce the disability induced by post-traumatic kyphosis. However, there is a lack of data reporting the ideal or theoretical lordosis that one must have in a particular lumbar segment on CT-scan. The main goal of this study was to determine the mean value for segmental lumbar lordosis according to pelvic incidence (PI) on a cohort of normal subjects. Methods: The consecutive CT-scan of 171 normal adult subjects were retrospectively analyzed. The PI and the segmental lordosis (L4S1, L3L5, L2L4, L3L1, L2T12 and T11-L1) were measured on all CT-scan. The mean values were calculated for the global cohort and a sub-group analysis according to IP ranges (< 45°, 45 < IP < 60° and > 60°) was performed. Results: The mean angular values for the whole cohort were IP: 54, 9°; L4S1: − 38, 1°; L3L5: − 30, 6°; L2L4: − 14, 1°; L1L3: − 4, 9°; T12L2: + 1, 9° and T11L1: + 5, 4°. The segmental values vary significatively with PI ranges, as for L3L5: − 26, 8° (PI < 45°); − 30° (45 < PI < 60°) and − 35, 1° (PI > 60°). Conclusion: These results provide a referential of theoretical values of segmental lordosis according to PI. This abacus may help spinal surgeon in their decision-making process regarding lumbar fractures, to determine the amount of sagittal correction needed, according to the PI range, to be adapted to the sagittal morphology of the patient. Level of evidence: III. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Sagittal parameters are significantly correlated with health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in adult spinal deformity patients. Their association with HRQoL in patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain (NSCLBP) is unclear. To analyze the correlation between sagittal parameters and disability in NSCLBP patients. A cross-sectional study. Subjects included 435 patients with NSCLBP divided into low disability and high disability groups. Function was measured using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Pain intensity was measured using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) and HRQoL was measured using 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). Sagittal parameters, demographic data, ODI, SF-36 eight-dimensional scores and NRS scores of patients with NSCLBP were collected. Taking ODI=20 as the cut-off value, patients were divided into low disability group (ODI≤20) and high disability group (ODI>20), and ODI were converted to Ranked ODI (RODI) accordingly. Univariate analysis of the correlation among age, gender, body mass index (BMI), sagittal parameters, RODI, SF-36 eight-dimensional scores, NRS scores were then conducted. The variables related to RODI were analyzed by logistic regression to discover their independent influence on RODI. p<.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. A total of 435 patients with NSCLBP were included. Univariate correlation analysis showed that the correlation coefficients between age, sacral slope-pelvic tilt (SS-PT), spinosacral angle (SSA) and RODI were (r=0.126, p<.01), (r=−0.115, p<.05), (r=−0.116, p<.05), respectively. The logistic regression analysis indicated that the regression coefficients of age and SSA were 0.030 (p=.001), −0.044 (p=.002), respectively, and the odds ratio and 95% confidence interval (CI) were 1.031 (1.012, 1.050), 0.957 (0.930, 0.985). Age and SSA are independent factors for disability of NSCLBP. SSA can comprehensively reflect the sagittal balance of the spine of patients with NSCLBP. Decreased SSA represents poor sagittal balance, which will increase the disability of NSCLBP. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis have only normative values for spines comprising five lumbar and five sacral vertebrae. However, it is unclear how pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis are affected by the common segmentation anomalies at the lumbo‐sacral border leading to lumbosacral transitional vertebrae, including lumbarisations and sacralisations. In lumbosacral transitional vertebrae it is not trivial to identify the correct vertebral endplates to measure pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis because ontogenetically the first sacral vertebra represents the first non‐mobile sacral segment in lumbarisations, but the second segment in sacralisations. We therefore assessed pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis with respect to both of these vertebral endplates. The type of segmentation anomaly was differentiated using spinal counts, spatial relationship with the iliac crest and morphological features. We found significant differences in pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis between lumbarisations, sacralisations and the control group. The pelvic incidence in the sacralised group was mostly below the range of the lubarisation group and the control group when measured the traditional way at the first non‐mobile segment (30.2°). However, the ranges of the sacralisation and lubarisation groups were completely encompassed by the control group when measured at the ontogenetically true first sacral vertebra. The mean pelvic incidence of the sacraliation group thus increased from 30.2° to 58.6°, and the mean pelvic incidence of the total sample increased from 45.6° to 51.2°, making it statistically indistinguishable from the control sample, whose pelvic incidence was 50.2°. Our results demonstrate that it is crucial to differentiate sacralisations from lumbarisation in order to assess the reference vertebra for pelvic incidence measurement. Due to their significant impact on spino‐pelvic parameters, lumbosacral transitional vertebrae should be evaluated separately when examining pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ABSTRACT: Background: Transforaminal anterior release (TFAR) is a technical extension of the transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) procedure with deliberate release of the anterior longitudinal ligament (ALL). Methods: In a retrospective, single-center observational cohort study, consecutive adult patients undergoing TLIF surgery at L4/L5 and/or L5/S1 between 01/2018 and 12/2022 for degenerative disc disease or deformity were considered. The TFAR group (with ALL release) was compared to a standard TLIF group (without ALL release), matched in a 1:3 ratio. Uni- and multivariable logistic regression models were built to estimate the likelihood of any adverse event (AE), reoperation, and excellent/good clinical outcome at 12 months. Results: Of 438 patients, 18 undergoing TFAR were matched to 53 undergoing standard TLIF. TFAR procedures were frequently part of extensive, anterior-posterior or multilevel fusion procedures with longer surgery time and higher blood loss. The rates of intraoperative surgical AEs were similar (16.7 vs. 11.3%, p=.789). The rates and severities of surgical AEs, as well as reoperation rates and clinical outcomes were similar at time of discharge, 90 days, and 12 months postoperatively (all p>.05). TFAR allowed for an increase in total lumbar lordosis of 16.1° and in lumbar lordosis between L4 and S1 of 16.3° at discharge, which was maintained during follow-up. In both the uni- and multivariable models, patients undergoing TFAR were as likely as patients undergoing standard TLIF to experience any AE (adjusted OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.21–2.94), any reoperation (aOR 0.46, 95% CI 0.11–1.90) or excellent/good clinical outcome at 12 months (aOR 2.01, 95% CI 0.52–7.74). Conclusions: The TFAR technique has a safety profile which is comparable to the standard TLIF procedure, but it allows for a greater restoration of lumbar lordosis at L4-S1. We suggest considering the TFAR technique in selected patients with sagittal imbalance and mobile segments for restoration of lumbar lordosis.

Abstract Background Sagittal and coronal standing radiographs have been the standard imaging for assessing spinal alignment. However, their disadvantages include distortion at the image edges and low interobserver reliability in some parameters. EOS® is a low-dose biplanar digital radiographic imaging system that can avoid distortion by obtaining high-definition images. Methods This study aimed to evaluate spinopelvic parameters in conventional lateral C1S1 upright radiographs and EOS® images and compare them. Patients with non-deformity changes were subjected to routine clinical examinations. Plain AP and lateral X-ray radiographs were obtained along the entire spine length. Patients were also referred for full-length EOS® of the spine. Thoracic Kyphosis (TK), Lumbar Lordosis (LL), Pelvic Tilt (PT), Sacral Slope (SS), Pelvic Incidence (PI), and Sagittal Vertical Axis (SVA) were measured in the two studies by an orthopedic surgeon and a radiologist using PACS software. Also, the orthopedic surgeon evaluated the studies again after two weeks. Intra- and inter-observer reliability was then assessed using the interclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Also, the coefficient of variation was used to assess intra- and inter-observer reliability. Bland-Altman plots were drawn for each parameter. Results The mean age was 48.2 ± 6.6 years. Among the 50 patients, 30 (60%) were female. The mean ICC for TK, LL, PT, SS, PI, and SVA in EOS® images are 0.95, 0.95, 0.92, 0.90, 0.94, and 0.98, respectively, and in C1S1 radiography images, it was 0.92, 0.87, 0.94, 0.88, 0.93, and 0.98, respectively which shows good to excellent results. The coefficient of variation for intraobserver reliability was relatively low (

Transitional lumbosacral vertebra presents in 2 forms based on its origin: sacralization and lumbarization. These patients have 2 options for sacral endplates (upper and lower) and consequently, 2 sets of values for spinopelvic parameters and lumbar lordosis (LL). This study aimed to evaluate these parameters in asymptomatic patients with sacralization and lumbarization and compare them with each other and normative values. Spinopelvic parameters and LL according to upper and lower endplate were measured using abdominal computed tomography in 1420 asymptomatic patients, of which 108 had Transitional lumbosacral vertebra. These parameters were compared among patients with lumbarization and sacralization and with normal controls. In addition, correlations between the upper and lower endplate parameters were determined. As compared to the control group, upper endplate measurements yielded lower spinopelvic parameters and LL values while lower endplate values yielded higher values. While these values were significantly different from normative values, these parameters were similar in both lumbarization and sacralization groups. Furthermore, most spinopelvic parameters of both upper and lower endplates were strongly correlated, and the differences between the upper and lower PI and LL values are relatively constant (27° and 14°, respectively. Upper and lower endplate parameters are comparable in patients with sacralization and lumbarization; therefore, the average spatial position of a sacralized L5 and a lumbarized S1 within the pelvis is similar and either parameter can be used for radiological measurements. Further studies with symptomatic patients are warranted to confirm these results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of our study is to investigate the effect of acute low back pain on spinopelvic parameters. Pre-pain and post-pain scoliosis radiographs of the patients who applied with the complaint of low back pain of acute onset (less than 12 weeks) were taken. Measurements of the spinopel-vic parameters were performed for each patient, including pelvic incidence (PI), sacral slope (SS), pelvic tilt (PT), lumbar lordosis (LL), and the sagittal vertical axis (SVA). 65 patients were included in the study. In the statistical study in acute low back pain, changes in SVA, PT, LL, and SS were found to be significant (p = 0.014, 0.006, 0.003, 0.003) Lumbar lordosis decreases as a result of pathologies, such as asymmetric disc degeneration and facet joint hypertrophy that occur in a chronic process, and the sagittal imbalance appears as a consequence of all these. After that, the mechanisms utilized to compensate for the resulting sagittal imbalance led to low back pain. However, differently, in the case of acute low back pain, the patient changes the sagittal alignment first, to yield a less painful posture. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design: Retrospective Cohort Study Objectives: To determine the effect of interbody cages inserted via posterior approach on segmental lordosis in the setting of preoperative lordotic vs kyphotic discs in patients with lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis (LDS). Methods: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data on assessment and management of LDS patients from 2 contributing centres. Patients were analyzed preoperatively and at 12-month follow-up with standing lumbar radiographs. Index level segmental lumbar lordosis (SLL), disc angle and global lumbar lordosis was measured. Patients were stratified into 4 groups based on index level disc angle and procedure: preoperative lordotic posterolateral fusion (group L-PLF); preoperative kyphotic PLF (group K-PLF); preoperative lordotic interbody fusion (IF) (group L-IF); preoperative kyphotic IF (group K-IF). Results: A total of 100/111 (90%) patients completed follow-up with 40 in group L-IF and 48 in group K-IF. There were 18 patients in group L-PLF and 5 in group K-PLF. Among patients with preoperatively lordotic disc angles who had a worsening of SLL, group L-IF had worse SLL than group L-PLF patients, with differences persisting at one-year (mean difference 2.30, 95% CI,.3, 4.3, P =.029). Patients in group K-IF achieved improvement in SLL at one-year more frequently than group L-IF (67% vs 44%, P =.046), with similar mean improvement magnitude between groups L-IF and K-IF (−1.1, 95% CI, −3.7, 1.6, P =.415). Conclusion: Segmental lordosis worsening was greater with preoperative index lordotic disc angles when an interbody cage was used. Patients who have a kyphotic disc preoperatively gain more lordosis with interbody cage use. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design: Retrospective Radiographic Review. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate the correlation between the sacral slope (SS) and pedicle morphological parameters of the fourth lumbar vertebra in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS). Methods: Our study included 134 patients with L4-5 DLS. We used preoperative multi-slice spiral computed tomography to measure a range of pedicle morphological parameters, and the SS and percentage of slip distance (SDP) of the L4 vertebra were measured on preoperative standing neutral lumbar radiography. Patients were divided into three groups based on their degree of SS: the low sacral slope (LSS) group with SS values of <35°, the mean sacral slope (MSS) group with SS of 35°–45°, and the high sacral slope (HSS) group with SS > 45°. Results: As the SS increased across groups, the pedicles of L4 became longer and thinner and the pedicle camber angle was smaller. The SDP, pedicle length parameters were positively correlated with the SS, while pedicle width, height, and camber angle were negatively correlated with the SS in the three groups. Conclusions: SS had an impact on the degree of spondylolisthesis and on pedicle morphological parameters in patients with DLS, with greater slope resulting in greater impact. The progression of DLS occurred due to the increasing forward shear force of the vertebra being greater than the reverse resistance. The pedicle at the slip level adaptively remodeled, becoming slenderer and tilting inward due to the long-term traction of the two opposing forces. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) is a commonly used technique for treating lumbar degenerative diseases. In this study, we developed a fully computer-supported pipeline to predict both the cage height and the degree of lumbar lordosis subtraction from the pelvic incidence (PI-LL) after TLIF surgery, utilizing preoperative X-ray images. The automated pipeline comprised two primary stages. First, the pretrained BiLuNet deep learning model was employed to extract essential features from X-ray images. Subsequently, five machine learning algorithms were trained using a five-fold cross-validation technique on a dataset of 311 patients to identify the optimal models to predict interbody cage height and postoperative PI-LL. LASSO regression and support vector regression demonstrated superior performance in predicting interbody cage height and postoperative PI-LL, respectively. For cage height prediction, the root mean square error (RMSE) was calculated as 1.01, and the model achieved the highest accuracy at a height of 12 mm, with exact prediction achieved in 54.43% (43/79) of cases. In most of the remaining cases, the prediction error of the model was within 1 mm. Additionally, the model demonstrated satisfactory performance in predicting PI-LL, with an RMSE of 5.19 and an accuracy of 0.81 for PI-LL stratification. In conclusion, our results indicate that machine learning models can reliably predict interbody cage height and postoperative PI-LL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery gives good clinical outcomes but has a high rate of mechanical complications (MC). In 2016, Lafage described the age-adjusted alignment thresholds (AAAT) to adapt the correction in relation to patient's age proposing less aggressive corrections for the elderly population. The aim of this review was to clarify the effectiveness of AAAT to achieve good health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and their relationship with post-operative MC. Materials and methods: We performed a review of the literature, including articles reporting data on post-operative HRQoL and MC rates in relation to the AAAT. Data were stratified according to whether they matched the AAAT, dividing the population in undercorrected (U), matched (M) and overcorrected (O). The quality of the included studies was assessed using the GRADE and MINORS systems. Results: Six articles reporting data from 1,825 patients were included. The different categories (U, M and O) had homogeneous pre-operative sagittal parameters (p > 0.05) that became statistically different after surgeries (p < 0.05). Proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) was more frequent in the O group compared to U (p = 0.05). Post-operative HRQoL parameters were similar in the 3 groups (p > 0.05). The quality of the included studies was generally low with a high bias risk. Conclusion: The results extrapolated from this review are interesting, as for the same HRQoL the U group had a lower MC rate. Unfortunately, the results are inconsistent, mainly because of the low quality of the included studies and the lack of reporting of some important patient- and surgery-related factors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background The impact of minimally invasive decompression (MID) techniques on spinopelvic parameters and on the sagittal alignment remains a controversial topic. Here we studied the changes in clinical and radiologic parameters and their relationships in a series of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) submitted to MID with a minimum follow-up (FU) of 24 months. Methods We prospectively collected clinical and radiologic data of 20 consecutive patients who were evaluated preoperatively, at the 6-month FU, and at the 24-month FU. Visual analog scale (VAS) for back and leg pain, Oswestry disability index (ODI), neck disability index (NDI), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), C7 slope (C7S), lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), and sacral slope (SS) were assessed for each patient. Moreover, the percentage variation of clinical and radiologic factors at the 24-month FU compared with the preoperative factors was calculated to perform correlation studies among these variables. Results We reported a significant improvement of all clinical parameters. A significant increase of LL and SS and a significant decrease of PT and SVA were observed. The preoperative values of ODI, LL, SS, PT, and SVA significantly affect the 24-month FU values, and the percentage improvement of SVA at the 24-month FU compared with the preoperative values was significantly related to the percentage improvement of LL. Conclusions MID is clinically effective in patients with LSS and improves the spinopelvic parameters and the global sagittal balance of the spine. The preoperative spinal alignment affects the spinal alignment at FU. The improvement of SVA was strictly related to the improvement of LL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To conduct a more comprehensive study of sagittal alignment in patients with thoracolumbar/lumbar (TL/L) degenerative kyphosis. Methods: A total of 133 consecutive patients from September 2016 to March 2019 with degenerative spinal kyphosis were enrolled. These patients were divided into different types according to sagittal alignment, including thoracolumbar junctional kyphosis (TLJK). Then, we divided the patients with TLJK into two groups: the Sagittal Balance group (C7-SVA < 50 mm) and the Sagittal Imbalance group (C7-SVA ≥ 50 mm). The sagittal parameters of each type or group were compared and correlation analysis was conducted. Results: Thoracolumbar/lumbar degenerative kyphosis consists of four types: Type I, lumbar kyphosis; Type II, degenerative flat back; Type III, thoracolumbar junctional kyphosis; and Type IV, global kyphosis. According to different sagittal alignments, Type III can further be divided into three subtypes: IIIA, with smooth kyphosis of thoracic and upper lumbar; IIIB, like a clasp knife, with a flat thoracic and lumbar angle; and IIIC, with bigger thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis. The thoracolumbar kyphosis angle (°) of the three subtypes were −23.61 ± 5.37, −25.40 ± 7.71, and −40.01 ± 8.40, respectively. Lumbar lordosis was correlated with thoracic kyphosis (IIIA, r = −0.600, p = 0.005; IIIB, r = −0.312, p = 0.046; IIIC, r = −0.657, p = 0.015), and correlated with sacral slope (IIIA, r = 0.537, p = 0.015; IIIB, r = 0.654, p = 0.000; IIIC, r = 0.578, p = 0.039). All spinopelvic parameters were compared between the Sagittal Balance group and the Sagittal Imbalance group, and only the thoracolumbar kyphosis angle showed statistical difference (t = −2.247, p = 0.028). Conclusions: The common characteristics of thoracolumbar junctional kyphosis were found to be a bigger thoracolumbar junctional angle and vertex of kyphosis located in the thoracolumbar junction (T10-L2). Despite TLJK, a change in the thoracic angle was still important to maintain sagittal balance. The thoracolumbar junction plays an important role in sagittal alignment and balance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study design: Retrospective review. Objective: To assess the change in pelvic incidence (PI) after lumbo-pelvic fixation and the differential impact of the type of pelvic fixation: S2-alar-iliac screws (S2AI) versus Iliac screws (IS) on postoperative PI. Summary of background data: Recent studies suggest that changes occur to the previously assumed fixed PI after spino-pelvic fixation. Methods: Adult spine deformity (ASD) patients who underwent spino-pelvic fixation with≥4 levels of fusion were included. Preoperative and postoperative PI, lumbar lordosis (LL), thoracic kyphosis, pelvic tilt, sacral slope, PI-LL mismatch, and the Sagittal Vertical Axis (SVA) were analyzed on EOS imaging. A significant PI change was established at≥6°. Patients were categorized based on the type of pelvic fixation (S2AI vs. IS). Results: One-hundred-forty-nine patients were included. Of these, 77(52%) had a>6° change in their PI postoperatively. In patients with high preoperative PI (>60°), 62% had a significant PI change compared with 33% of patients with normal PI (40°-60°) and 53% in patients with low PI (<40°; P =0.01). PI was likely to decrease in patients with high baseline PI (>60°) and to increase in patients with low baseline PI (<40°). Patients with a significant PI change had a higher PI-LL. Patients in the S2AI group (n=99) and those in the IS group (n=50) were comparable at baseline. In the S2AI group, 50 (51%) patients had>6° change in their PI compared with 27(54%) patients in the IS group(P =0.65). In both groups, patients with high preoperative PI were more prone to significant postoperative changes (P =0.02 in IS, P =0.01 in S2AI). Conclusion: PI changed significantly in 50% of patients postoperatively, especially in those with high/low preoperative PI and those with severe baseline sagittal imbalance. This occurs similarly in patients with S2AI and those with IS screws. Surgeons should keep in mind these anticipated changes while planning ideal LL, as this impacts postoperative PI-LL mismatch. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: According to previous studies, the relationship between lumbar lordosis and thoracic kyphosis or that between pelvic parameters and thoracic kyphosis have been inconsistent. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate spinal sagittal alignment and its relationship to global and regional lumbar and thoracic angles, pelvic and sway angles, and C7–S1 distance measurements, followed by a detailed subgroup analysis using an inertial measurement unit system. METHODS: A total of 51 asymptomatic volunteers stood in a comfortable posture with inertial measurement units attached to the T1, T7, T12, L3, and S2 vertebrae. T1, T7, T12, L3, and S2 sagittal angles were acquired during standing posture using the Eulerian angle coordinate system. All angles are reported as the mean of three 5-s measurements. Following the measurement of lumbar lordosis angles (T12 relative S2), participants were divided into the flat lumbar and normal lordosis groups. RESULTS: There were different correlation patterns between groups because of spinal sagittal imbalance, which was greater in the flat lumbar group than in the normal lordosis group. In addition, sacral inclination proved the ideal parameter to evaluate reciprocal balance in lumbar lordosis, showing a stronger correlation with lower than with upper lumbar lordosis. T1 was the key element in assessing thoracic kyphosis, which showed a stronger correlation with upper than with lower thoracic kyphosis. CONCLUSION: We suggest that when assessing posture, it is necessary to identify the global and regional angles and it is useful to classify spinal sagittal alignment into subgroups according to lumbar lordosis and evaluate the groups separately. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design: A prospective study of healthy volunteers Objectives: The influence of the sagittal alignment of the spine and its influence on the extension reserve have been reported in the literature. However, specific analysis of the intrinsic coxofemoral and extrinsic pelvic component in subjects without any spinal or hip pathologies remains poorly reported. The aim of this study was to categorize the hip extension capacity, or extension reserve (ER), in relation to spinal sagittal alignment whilst standing, in a young healthy population. We hypothesized that the global extension reserve (GER) of the hip joint was influenced by the sagittal spinopelvic alignment. Methods: We evaluated the ER of 120 healthy Caucasian volunteers (56 females (46.7%), 74 males (53.3%); mean age 25.6 years), using low dose radiographs from an EOS® X-ray imaging system in 2 functional positions; neutral standing position and in a forward lunge position. The GER is defined as the sum of the intrinsic (hip) extension reserve (IER) and the extrinsic (pelvic) extension reserve (EER). Cases were grouped into 4 sagittal alignment subtypes according to the Roussouly classification, and analyzed. Results: Global extension reserve values were not significantly different between the 4 Roussouly subtypes (P =.094), nor between patients with a sacral slope (SS) <35° (types 1/2) and ≥ 35° (type 3/4) (P =.837). Statistically significant differences were seen between IER in each subtype (P =.015), and EER (P =.006). No difference in ER was seen between subtypes regarding pelvic incidence (PI). Conclusion: An inverse relationship was found between IER and EER among Roussouly subtypes. The range of motion of the pelvis and the hip joint was higher in patients with a greater sacral slope. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective of this retrospective study was to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of PKP in elderly patients with thoracic OVCFs, with or without IVC.Methods: A total of 106 patients were enrolled in this study and divided into two groups: the IVC group and the NIVC group (without IVC). Radiographic measures included anterior vertebral height (AVH), thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), and sacral slope (SS). Clinical function measures included Oswestry disability index (ODI) and visual analog scale (VAS) scores.Results: There were no significant differences in the preoperative basic data between the groups classified as IVC and NIVC. However, both groups showed significant improvements in AVH and TK throughout the follow-up periods compared to the preoperative measurements (P< 0.05). The recovery of AVH in the IVC group was found to be inferior to that in the NIVC group at 3 years after operation (P< 0.05). There were no significant differences in LL, PI, PT and SS in both groups compared with the preoperative results and no statistically significant differences between the two groups at the same follow-up time (P 0.05). The VAS and ODI scores during all follow-up periods were significantly lower than those before operation (P< 0.05). At 3 years after operation, the VAS and ODI scores of the IVC group were higher than those of the NIVC group (P< 0.05).Conclusion: PKP is an adoptable measure to treat thoracic OVCFs with or without IVC. Our study revealed that the NIVC group was superior to the IVC group in terms of improved vertebral height and pain recovery at long-term follow-up (3 years). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design This study adopted a retrospective study design. Purpose Our study aimed to investigate the impact of central canal stenosis severity on surgical outcomes and lumbar sagittal correction after lumbar decompression. Overview of Literature Studies have evaluated sagittal correction in patients with central canal stenosis after lumbar decompression and the association of stenosis severity with worse preoperative sagittal alignment. However, none have evaluated the impact of spinal stenosis severity on sagittal correction. Methods Patients undergoing posterior lumbar decompression (PLD) of ≤4 levels were divided into severe and non-severe central canal stenosis groups based on the Lee magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) grading system. Patients without preoperative MRI or inadequate visualization on radiographs were excluded. Surgical characteristics, clinical outcomes, and sagittal measurements were compared. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to determine the predictors of pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), lumbar lordosis (LL), and pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis (PI–LL). Results Of the 142 patients included, 39 had severe stenosis, and 103 had non-severe stenosis. The mean follow-up duration for the cohort was 4.72 months. Patients with severe stenosis were older, had higher comorbidity indices and levels decompressed, and longer lengths of stay and operative times (p0.05). On multivariate regression, severe stenosis was a significant predictor of a lower preoperative LL (estimate=−5.243, p=0.045) and a higher preoperative PI–LL mismatch (estimate=6.192, p=0.039). No differences in surgical or clinical outcomes were observed (p>0.05). Conclusion Severe central lumbar stenosis was associated with greater spinopelvic mismatch preoperatively. Sagittal balance improved in both patients with severe and non-severe stenosis after PLD to a similar degree, with differences in sagittal parameters remaining after surgery. We also found no differences in postoperative outcomes associated with stenosis severity.