Search

This article explores the use of stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) as a potential treatment option for secondary central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma before chimeric antigen receptor modified T-cell (CAR-T) therapy. The authors present a case series of three patients who underwent SRT followed by CAR-T, resulting in successful outcomes and remission of CNS lymphoma without significant cognitive impairments. The article suggests that SRT could be a viable and effective bridging therapy for patients with CNS lymphoma before CAR-T, but further research is needed to determine the optimal dosage and timing of SRT in combination with systemic therapy. [Extracted from the article]

Abstract Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T) has been successful in treating relapsed/refractory B-cell lymphomas. However, its role in the treatment of diseases involving the central nervous system (CNS) is not well studied. We performed a multicenter retrospective cohort study to evaluate the outcomes of patients with secondary CNS lymphoma (SCNSL) who received CAR-T. Eligibility required active CNSL at the time of apheresis. The objectives included evaluation of overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), identification of predictors of complete response (CR) post-CAR-T, and assessment of risk factors for cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). Sixty-one patients were included in the analysis. The overall response rate was 68% with a CR rate of 57%. In the multivariable analysis, patients who experienced any grade CRS had higher odds of achieving CR (OR = 3.9, 95% CI = 1.01–15.39, p = 0.047). The median PFS was 3.3 months (95% CI = 2.6–6.0 months) with 6- and 12-month PFS rates of 35% and 16%, respectively. The median OS was 7.6 months (95% CI = 5.0–13.5 months) with 6- and 12-month OS rates of 59% and 41%, respectively. Any grade CRS and ICANS were 70% (n = 43) and 57% (n = 34), respectively with grade ≥ 3 CRS and ICANS rates of 16% and 44%. Factors associated with increased risk of CRS and ICANS included receiving axi-cel or having leptomeningeal ± parenchymal + CNS involvement, respectively. Despite achieving high response rates, most patients experience early relapse or death following CAR-T in SCNSL. The current study provides a benchmark for future trials exploring novel therapeutic options in SCNSL.

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T) has been successful in treating relapsed/refractory B-cell lymphomas. However, its role in the treatment of diseases involving the central nervous system (CNS) is not well studied. We performed a multicenter retrospective cohort study to evaluate the outcomes of patients with secondary CNS lymphoma (SCNSL) who received CAR-T. Eligibility required active CNSL at the time of apheresis. The objectives included evaluation of overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), identification of predictors of complete response (CR) post-CAR-T, and assessment of risk factors for cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). Sixty-one patients were included in the analysis. The overall response rate was 68% with a CR rate of 57%. In the multivariable analysis, patients who experienced any grade CRS had higher odds of achieving CR (OR = 3.9, 95% CI = 1.01–15.39, p = 0.047). The median PFS was 3.3 months (95% CI = 2.6–6.0 months) with 6- and 12-month PFS rates of 35% and 16%, respectively. The median OS was 7.6 months (95% CI = 5.0–13.5 months) with 6- and 12-month OS rates of 59% and 41%, respectively. Any grade CRS and ICANS were 70% (n = 43) and 57% (n = 34), respectively with grade ≥ 3 CRS and ICANS rates of 16% and 44%. Factors associated with increased risk of CRS and ICANS included receiving axi-cel or having leptomeningeal ± parenchymal + CNS involvement, respectively. Despite achieving high response rates, most patients experience early relapse or death following CAR-T in SCNSL. The current study provides a benchmark for future trials exploring novel therapeutic options in SCNSL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Central nervous system lymphoma is a rarity among brain tumours. The clinical course depends on location and size of the tumour. Various established treatments, including chemotherapy, radiation, and stem cell transplantation, are available. The resection of intracranial lesions is still under discussion. In our retrospective analysis, we were able to show that compared to the sole confirmation of diagnosis through stereotactic biopsy, the resection of the lesion offered a significant advantage in patient survival. Especially for singular, easily accessible lesions, resection in addition to radiotherapy/chemotherapy could have a benefit. Our findings substantiate earlier research outcomes and shall lay the foundation for forthcoming prospective investigations. Background: Central nervous system lymphoma (CNSL) is rare form of brain tumour. It manifests either as primary CNS lymphoma (pCNSL) originating within the central nervous system or as secondary CNS lymphoma (sCNSL), arising as cerebral metastases of systemic lymphoma. For a significant period, surgical resection was considered obsolete due to the favourable response to chemotherapy and the associated risk of postoperative deficits. The objective of the present study was to demonstrate the benefits of resection in CNSL patients, including extended survival and improved postoperative function. Methods: A retrospective study involving patients diagnosed with either PCNSL or SCNSL that were surgically approached at our neurosurgical department between 2010 and 2022 was conducted. Patients were categorised into three subgroups based on their neurosurgical approach: (1) stereotactical biopsy, (2) open biopsy, (3) resection. We then performed statistical analyses to assess overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Additionally, we examined various secondary factors such as functional outcome via Karnofsky Performance Index (KPS) and prognosis scoring. Results: 157 patients diagnosed with PCNSL or SCNSL were enclosed in the study. Of these, 101 underwent stereotactic biopsy, 21 had open biopsy, and 35 underwent resection. Mean age of the cohort was 64.94 years, with majority of patients being female (54.1%). The resection group showed longest OS at 44 months (open biopsy = 13 months, stereotactic biopsy = 9 months). Calculated median follow-up was 34.5 months. In the Cox regression model, postoperative KPS 70% (p < 0.001) and resection vs. stereotactic biopsy (p = 0.040) were identified as protective factors, whereas older age at diagnosis was identified as a risk factor (p < 0.001). In the one-way analysis of variance, differences in postoperative KPS were found among all groups (p = 0.021), while there was no difference in preoperative KPS among the groups. Conclusions: Our data show a favourable outcome when resection is compared to either stereotactic or open biopsy. Additionally, the marginally improved postoperative functional status observed in patients who underwent resection, as opposed to in those who underwent biopsy, provides further evidence in favour of the advantages of surgical resection for enhancing neurological deficits. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Central Nervous System (CNS) Lymphomas are aggressive brain tumors with limited treatment options. Targeting the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway yields promising responses across B-cell malignancies, but its therapeutic potential in CNS lymphomas remains unexplored. We present pre-clinical and clinical data on the pan-PI3K inhibitor Buparlisib in CNS lymphomas. In a primary CNS lymphoma-patient-derived cell line, we define the EC50. Four patients with recurrent CNS lymphoma were enrolled in a prospective trial. We evaluated Buparlisib plasma and cerebrospinal fluid pharmacokinetics, clinical outcomes, and adverse events. Treatment was well tolerated. Common toxicities include hyperglycemia, thrombocytopenia, and lymphopenia. The presence of Buparlisib in plasma and CSF was confirmed 2h post-treatment with a median CSF concentration below the EC50 defined in the cell line All four patients were evaluated for response and the median time to progression was 39 days. Buparlisib monotherapy did not lead to meaningful responses and the trial was prematurely stopped.Clinical Trial Registration: NCT02301364 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) occurs primarily in older patients and has a worse prognosis than other extranodal lymphomas. Contemporary treatment is based on high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX), which crosses the blood–brain barrier. Secondary CNS lymphoma (SCNSL) can occur concomitantly with systemic lymphoma or later at relapse and generally has a dismal outcome. We reviewed disease characteristics and outcomes of 103 patients (44 PCNSL and 59 SCNSL) treated at our center between 2015 and 2020. Median ages at diagnosis were 64 and 62 years, respectively. In both groups, diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) was the major histologic type; in SCNSL, other types were also seen. SCNSL, in contrast with PCNSL, manifested with smaller tumors or cerebrospinal fluid positivity. For SCNSL the mean interval to brain involvement was 18 months (0–138). The overall survival had a trend to worse in SCNSL; median survival 11 months versus 61 months in PCNSL (p = 0.089). Progression-free survival was similar in both groups. A significant proportion of SCNSL patients with poor performance status could not obtain CNS-directed treatments. The strongest predictor of poor outcome was ECOG performance status 2 + at diagnosis for both groups. Charlson comorbidity index was predictive only for the PCNSL cohort. Tumor size was not prognostic for survival. The number of HD-MTX cycles correlated with survival, whereas the regimen itself and average cumulative dose of methotrexate did not play a role. Our study is in line with the recent literature and confirms ongoing challenges. We discuss how the outcomes of CNS lymphomas can be improved. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract This is a case of high-risk, aggressive, high-grade medullary B-cell lymphoma presenting with new onset of neurological dysfunction following initial complete response to the standard chemoimmunotherapy. A whole-body re-staging PET using fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) integrated with computed tomography (18FDG-PET/CT) performed with clinical suspicion of arachnoiditis, eloquently demonstrated unequivocal multifocal FDG uptake by the spinal cord without evidence of systemic recurrence, leading to a clinical diagnosis of secondary CNS lymphoma, which is a rare complication of DLBCL with ominous prognosis. Four cycles of Modified-MATRIX protocol resulted in a halt in fulminant course of the disease and the patient experienced slight reversal of the neurological deficits, although not deemed clinically fit for a repeat 18FDG-PET/CT due to his poor general well-being. Repeat MRI was suggestive of partial recovery, however. The clinical stability was proven short-lived, and the patient experienced progressive lower limb weakness only 3 weeks after discharge following his last cycle of treatment. Isolated CNS relapse of lymphoma is a rare occurrence in the literature. The CNS recurrence is more often leptomeningeal or confined to the brain parenchyma rather than the spinal cord. The role of 18FDG-PET/CT in the diagnostic algorithm of secondary CNS lymphoma is unclear and its significance in risk stratification and assessing the response to treatment has not been evaluated. This case report illustrates the imaging findings of a more unusual form of the disease with multifocal intramedullary involvement of the spinal cord, and highlights imaging features of this rare condition with 18FDG-PET/CT and MRI to support decision making in good clinical practice.

Secondary central nervous system lymphoma (SCNSL) affects approximately 5% of patients with aggressive large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) and is associated with poor outcomes. This retrospective, multicenter study included 62 consecutive patients with SCNSL intended for transplant with high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX)-based induction followed by high-dose thiotepa, busulfan, melphalan, rituximab (TBMR) conditioning and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Median age was 58 years (range 20–75) and 52 (84%) patients had ECOG performance status >1 at diagnosis of SCNSL. Fifty-two (84%) patients completed induction and proceeded to TBMR/ASCT. With median follow-up 5.7 years, 5-year progression-free and overall survival rates were 53% (95% CI 39–65%) and 65% (95% CI 51–76%) for all patients and 62% (95% CI 45–74%) and 73% (95% CI 57–84%) for those undergoing TBMR/ASCT, respectively. Despite a historically poor prognosis, HD-MTX-based induction followed by TBMR/ASCT has the potential to achieve long-term survival in a substantial proportion of patients with SCNSL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Opinion statement: Referring to any central nervous system (CNS) involvement with preceding or concurrent systemic disease, secondary CNS lymphoma (SCNSL) lacks a clear standard of care and historically carries a very poor prognosis. Aggressive histologies predominate, most notably diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), with higher relative frequency in Burkitt lymphoma but lower absolute incidence. Therapeutic strategies commonly feature intensive CNS-penetrant chemotherapy, including methotrexate, cytarabine, and others. Combination regimens, novel targeted agents, and cellular therapy considerations are reviewed, noting that patients with SCNSL are often excluded from clinical trials and dedicated SCNSL studies are historically limited. Given these challenges, there has been renewed attention on CNS prophylaxis as well as strategies for early CNS detection. Prophylaxis is standard of care in Burkitt lymphoma, whereas its role in DLBCL and related histologies is increasingly unclear. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This is a case of high-risk, aggressive, high-grade medullary B-cell lymphoma presenting with new onset of neurological dysfunction following initial complete response to the standard chemoimmunotherapy. A whole-body re-staging PET using fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) integrated with computed tomography (18FDG-PET/CT) performed with clinical suspicion of arachnoiditis, eloquently demonstrated unequivocal multifocal FDG uptake by the spinal cord without evidence of systemic recurrence, leading to a clinical diagnosis of secondary CNS lymphoma, which is a rare complication of DLBCL with ominous prognosis. Four cycles of Modified-MATRIX protocol resulted in a halt in fulminant course of the disease and the patient experienced slight reversal of the neurological deficits, although not deemed clinically fit for a repeat 18FDG-PET/CT due to his poor general well-being. Repeat MRI was suggestive of partial recovery, however. The clinical stability was proven short-lived, and the patient experienced progressive lower limb weakness only 3 weeks after discharge following his last cycle of treatment. Isolated CNS relapse of lymphoma is a rare occurrence in the literature. The CNS recurrence is more often leptomeningeal or confined to the brain parenchyma rather than the spinal cord. The role of 18FDG-PET/CT in the diagnostic algorithm of secondary CNS lymphoma is unclear and its significance in risk stratification and assessing the response to treatment has not been evaluated. This case report illustrates the imaging findings of a more unusual form of the disease with multifocal intramedullary involvement of the spinal cord, and highlights imaging features of this rare condition with 18FDG-PET/CT and MRI to support decision making in good clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BackgroundThe efficacy and safety of chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in the treatment of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma has already been demonstrated. However, patients with a history of/active secondary central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma were excluded from the licensing trials conducted on two widely used CAR-T cell products, Axicabtagene ciloleucel (Axi-cel) and Tisagenlecleucel (Tisa-cel). Hence, the objective of the present review was to assess whether secondary CNS lymphoma patients would derive a benefit from Axi-cel or Tisa-cel therapy, while maintaining controllable safety.MethodTwo reviewers searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane library independently in order to identify all records associated with Axi-cel and Tisa-cel published prior to February 15, 2021. Studies that included secondary CNS lymphoma patients treated with Axi-cel and Tisa-cel and reported or could be inferred efficacy and safety endpoints of secondary CNS lymphoma patients were included. A tool designed specifically to evaluate the risk of bias in case series and reports and the ROBINS-I tool applied for cohort studies were used.ResultsTen studies involving forty-four patients were included. Of these, seven were case reports or series. The other three reports were cohort studies involving twenty-five patients. Current evidence indicates that secondary CNS lymphoma patients could achieve long-term remission following Axi-cel and Tisa-cel treatment. Compared with the non-CNS cohort, however, progression-free survival and overall survival tended to be shorter. This was possibly due to the relatively small size of the CNS cohort. The incidence and grades of adverse effects in secondary CNS lymphoma patients resembled those in the non-CNS cohort. No incidences of CAR-T cell-related deaths were reported. Nevertheless, the small sample size introduced a high risk of bias and prevented the identification of specific patients who could benefit more from CAR-T cell therapy.ConclusionSecondary CNS lymphoma patients could seem to benefit from both Axi-cel and Tisa-cel treatment, with controllable risks. Thus, CAR-T cell therapy has potential as a candidate treatment for lymphoma patients with CNS involvement. Further prospective studies with larger samples and longer follow-up periods are warranted and recommended.

Background: The efficacy and safety of chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in the treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma has already been demonstrated. However, patients with a history of/active secondary central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma were excluded from the licensing trials conducted on two widely used CAR-T cell products, Axicabtagene ciloleucel (Axi-cel) and Tisagenlecleucel (Tisa-cel). Hence, the objective of the present review was to assess whether secondary CNS lymphoma patients would derive a benefit from Axi-cel or Tisa-cel therapy, while maintaining controllable safety. Method: Two reviewers searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane library independently in order to identify all records associated with Axi-cel and Tisa-cel published prior to February 15, 2021. Studies that included secondary CNS lymphoma patients treated with Axi-cel and Tisa-cel and reported or could be inferred efficacy and safety endpoints of secondary CNS lymphoma patients were included. A tool designed specifically to evaluate the risk of bias in case series and reports and the ROBINS-I tool applied for cohort studies were used. Results: Ten studies involving forty-four patients were included. Of these, seven were case reports or series. The other three reports were cohort studies involving twenty-five patients. Current evidence indicates that secondary CNS lymphoma patients could achieve long-term remission following Axi-cel and Tisa-cel treatment. Compared with the non-CNS cohort, however, progression-free survival and overall survival tended to be shorter. This was possibly due to the relatively small size of the CNS cohort. The incidence and grades of adverse effects in secondary CNS lymphoma patients resembled those in the non-CNS cohort. No incidences of CAR-T cell-related deaths were reported. Nevertheless, the small sample size introduced a high risk of bias and prevented the identification of specific patients who could benefit more from CAR-T cell therapy. Conclusion: Secondary CNS lymphoma patients could seem to benefit from both Axi-cel and Tisa-cel treatment, with controllable risks. Thus, CAR-T cell therapy has potential as a candidate treatment for lymphoma patients with CNS involvement. Further prospective studies with larger samples and longer follow-up periods are warranted and recommended. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We analyzed 25 patients receiving whole brain radiation (WBRT) for secondary CNS lymphoma (SCNSL), grouped by consolidative intent (after complete/partial response, n = 13) vs. palliative intent (initial CNS treatment, primary refractory disease, or CNS progression, n = 12). Median WBRT dose for the consolidative and palliative cohorts were 24 Gy and 30 Gy, respectively. For 13 patients receiving consolidative WBRT, median OS was 24 months from WBRT and 2-year OS was 64%. Three patients had CNS relapse at 2, 9, and 24 months after consolidative WBRT. For 12 patients receiving palliative WBRT, median OS was 3 months from WBRT and two-year OS was 8%. All 10 patients with neurologic symptoms had documented improvement. In conclusion, consolidative WBRT after chemotherapy response led to reasonable long-term survival and may be an effective strategy for SCNSL, especially transplant-ineligible patients and/or isolated CNS recurrence. Palliative WBRT effectively improved neurologic symptoms, but survival was usually only months. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Central nervous system lymphoma (CNSL) is a rare form of extranodal non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Central nervous system lymphoma can be primary (isolated to the central nervous space) or secondary in the setting of systemic disease. Treatment of CNSL has improved since the introduction of high-dose methotrexate and aggressive consolidation regimens. However, results after treatment are durable in only half of patients, and long-term survivors may experience late neurotoxicity, impacting quality of life. Given the rarity of this disease, few randomized prospective trials exist. This leaves many questions unanswered regarding optimal first-line and salvage treatments. Recent advances in the knowledge of pathophysiology of CNSL will hopefully help the development of future treatments. This review gives an overview of the epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of immunocompetent patients with CNSL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma has traditionally had very poor outcomes however advances in management have resulted in dramatic improvements and long-term survival of patients. We describe the evidence for treatment strategies for these aggressive disorders. In primary CNS lymphoma there are randomized trial data to inform treatment decisions but these are lacking to guide management in secondary CNS lymphoma. Dynamic assessment of patient fitness and frailty is key throughout treatment, alongside delivery of CNS-bioavailable therapy and enrolment in clinical trials, at each stage of the disease. Intensive high-dose methotrexate-containing induction followed by consolidation with autologous stem cell transplantation with thiotepa-based conditioning is recommended for patients who are fit. Less intensive chemoimmunotherapy, novel agents (including Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors, cereblon targeting immunomodulatory agents, and checkpoint inhibitors in the context of clinical trials), and whole brain radiotherapy may be reserved for less fit patients or disease which is chemoresistant. Data regarding the efficacy of chimeric antigen receptor T-cells therapy is emerging, and concerns regarding greater toxicity have not been realized. Future areas of prospective studies include the identification of those at high risk of developing CNS lymphoma, management in elderly or frail patients as well as incorporating novel agents into regimens, particularly for those with chemoresistant disease., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest JK and KL have no conflicts of interest to disclose. KC: Consulting/Advisory Role: Abbvie, Roche, Takeda, BMS, Atara, Gilead, KITE, Janssen; Speakers’ Bureau: Roche, Takeda, KITE, Gilead, BMS; Conferences/Travel support: Roche, Takeda, KITE, Janssen, BMS., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The prognosis of central nervous system (CNS) relapse of systemic non-Hodgkin lymphoma is poor with 1-year survival historically at 0% to 20%. Aiming to improve these results, we performed a multicenter phase 2 study in patients with a CNS relapse, with or without concurrent systemic relapse. Treatment consisted of 2 cycles of R-DHAP alternating with high-dose methotrexate (MTX) and was combined with intrathecal rituximab. Responding patients received a third R-DHAP-MTX cycle followed by busulfan and cyclophosphamide myeloablative therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation. In patients with persistent cerebrospinal fluid lymphoma after cycle 1, the intrathecal rituximab was replaced by intrathecal triple therapy, with MTX, cytarabine, and dexamethasone. Thirty-six patients were included. Eighteen had evidence of cerebrospinal fluid lymphoma, 24 had brain parenchymal disease, and 20 (56%) had concurrent systemic disease. The overall response rate after 2 R-DHAP-MTX was 53% (19/36), with 22% (8/36) complete remission. Fifteen patients (42%) underwent a transplant. One-year progression-free survival was 19% (95% confidence interval, 9-34): 25% in patients without and 15% in patients with systemic disease. One-year overall survival was 25% (95% confidence interval, 12-40). This treatment regimen did not result in a major improvement of outcome of secondary CNS lymphoma, especially when concurrent systemic disease was present. Registered in the Dutch trial register www.trialregister.nl, NTR1757; EudraCT number 2006-002141-37. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Although the survival rates are extremely low for patients with secondary central nervous system lymphoma (SCNSL) treated with conventional chemotherapy and radiotherapy, more encouraging outcomes have recently been reported in small series with high-dose (HD) therapy and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). The optimal HD regimen for SCNSL is unknown. Despite reports of thiotepa/busulfan-based conditioning for primary CNS lymphoma, very little data exist regarding the use of this regimen for SCNSL. We analyzed 23 patients with SCNSL (median age 62 years) who underwent ASCT at two Alberta centers using thiotepa, busulfan, cyclophosphamide (TBC) in six patients prior to 2011 and rituximab-busulfan, melphalan, thiotepa (R-BuMelTt) in 17 patients after 2011. At a median follow-up of 27.8 months (4.2-113.6), the 2-year actuarial rate of progression-free survival was 76.1%. In conclusion, our results demonstrate encouraging survival outcomes for patients with SCNSL treated with R-BuMelTt and ASCT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Relapsed/refractory central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma, whether primary or secondary, is associated with poor prognosis with currently available treatment modalities, including high-dose chemotherapy-autologous stem cell transplantation. The pivotal ZUMA-1 and JULIET trials that led to FDA approval of Axicabtagene ciloleucel and Tisagenlecleucel for relapsed refractory large cell lymphoma excluded patients with CNS involvement due to concerns of increased toxicity. However, TRANSCEND study for Lisocabtagene maraleucel in relapsed refractory large cell lymphoma allowed patients with CNS involvement and reported manageable CNS toxicities in these patients. In the real-world experience, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) therapy has been deemed safe and effective for these patients with poor prognosis. In this systematic review, we analyzed available literature to evaluate the role of CAR T-cell therapy in both primary and secondary CNS lymphoma using Embase, Cochrane, and PubMed databases. A total of 14 studies, including 8 retrospective analyses and 6 prospective studies/clinical trials, were included in the qualitative synthesis to study the safety and efficacy of CAR T. Based on our analysis, CAR T-cell therapy appears to be associated with reasonable efficacy and a manageable safety for primary and secondary CNS lymphoma., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background Central nervous system lymphoma (CNSL) is typically treated with chemotherapy and external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). Optimal management of recurrent CNSL is poorly defined. Objective We aim to determine the effectiveness of stereotactic radiosurgery in the treatment of recurrent CNSL. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of patients having stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for recurrent intracranial CNSL between 1999 and 2011. Results Fourteen patients (20 tumors) underwent SRS. The median patient age was 71 years (range, 18–82 years). Seven patients (50%) had primary CNSL. All had received prior chemotherapy, and nine patients (64%) had undergone prior whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) with a median dose of 40 Gy in 25 fractions. The median preoperative Karnofsky Performance Score was 80. The median tumor volume was 6.7 cm 3 (range, 0.5–37.7); the median margin dose was 15.5 Gy (range, 10–18). Eleven patients (79%) had tumor regression ( n = 11) shown on MRI after SRS. The median overall survival after SRS was 9.5 months. No patient had a major radiation-related complication. Conclusion Stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with recurrent CNSL is well tolerated and has a high rate of radiographic response. A marginal dose of 15.5 Gy or greater, a Karnofsky score of 80 or greater, and the absence of pre-SRS WBRT were associated with significantly longer overall survival. Stereotactic radiosurgery may be beneficial as an initial salvage therapy in the treatment of recurrent CNSL for properly selected patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The recurrence of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) in the central nervous system (CNS) is rapidly fatal in most cases. Highly aggressive lymphomas, such as lymphoblastic and Burkitt lymphomas, carry a high risk of CNS relapse. CNS relapse in intermediately aggressive subtypes, such as diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, is uncommon, but not rare. The risk of CNS relapse in indolent lymphomas is low. Prognostic markers of CNS relapse include elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase levels, the presence of B symptoms, and extranodal involvement at more than one site. Most centers give prophylactic CNS chemotherapy to patients considered at high risk of CNS recurrence. However, definitions of risk factors vary, and there is a lack of consensus regarding prophylaxis indications. More research is needed to define which patients might benefit from CNS prophylaxis at initial treatment and to find the optimal regimen for prophylaxis. A variety of treatments have been used to treat CNS relapse, but current regimens have had little success in extending survival after CNS relapse. Although long-term survival has been reported in a minority of patients with isolated CNS recurrence after treatment with methotrexate, more effective regimens are needed if survival times after relapse are to be prolonged. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

An 86-year-old woman in a wheelchair was accompanied by her husband and son as she visited our outpatient clinic due to disturbed consciousness and fever. Twenty-seven years earlier, she had been diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis and had been treated with methotrexate (MTX) and low-dose prednisolone (PSL). She stopped taking MTX four years previously when she was diagnosed with diffuse large B cell lymphoma of the paranasal sinus. Her lymphoma went into remission after six cycles of systemic immunochemotherapy. MRI after hospitalization revealed a lesion in the splenium of the corpus callosum that was hyperintense on diffusion-weighted imaging and which had low apparent diffusion coefficient values. An analysis of the cerebrospinal fluid revealed no atypical cells. The MRI findings were atypical, but her consciousness disturbance improved, leading to the diagnosis of mild encephalitis/encephalopathy with a reversible splenial lesion, which would be associated with a transient consciousness disturbance with a good course. However, her consciousness worsened over the next 3 weeks. One month later, a contrast-enhanced MRI showed an enlarged lesion in the callosum as well as new lesions, and the diagnosis of secondary CNS lymphoma was made. Brain biopsy is often not feasible. Less invasive and highly accurate diagnostic methods are needed, such as the identification of a spinal fluid tumor marker.

Aim: To describe the long-term outcomes of patients with lymphoma in the CNS treated with rituximab, temozolomide and high-dose methotrexate without consolidation therapy., Patients & Methods: A retrospective cohort study of 46 consecutive patients with primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL, 27 patients) or secondary CNS involvement of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL, 19 patients) who were treated with rituximab on day 1 in combination with high-dose methotrexate (days 1 and 15) and temozolomide (days 1-5) in 28-day cycles without further consolidation., Results: Median follow-up was 21.2 months. Patients received a median of five cycles (range 1-15). Median overall survival (OS) was 26 months and median progression-free survival was 8.6 months. At 3 years, 37% of patients were alive and without evidence of disease. The patients with PCNSL had a significantly higher response rates (ORR 81 vs 47%; p = 0.015) and longer median OS (55.3 vs 4.8 months; p < 0.01) than those with secondary CNS DLBCL. Toxicities were mild and manageable., Conclusion: The rituximab, temozolomide and methotrexate regimen is an effective therapy for patients with PCNSL without the toxicities typically associated with consolidation therapy., Competing Interests: Financial & competing interests disclosure The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties. No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.

Introduction: Making the diagnosis of secondary CNS involvement in lymphoma can be difficult due to unspecific signs and symptoms, limited accessibility of brain/myelon parenchyma and low sensitivity and/or specifity of imaging and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) examination currently available. Areas covered: MRI of the total neuroaxis followed by CSF cytomorphology and flow cytometry are methods of choice when CNS lymphoma (CNSL) is suspected. To reduce the numerous pitfalls of these examinations several aspects should be considered. New CSF biomarkers might be of potential diagnostic value. Attempts to standardize response criteria are presented. Expert commentary: Diagnosing CNSL remains challenging. Until diagnostic methods combining high sensitivity with high specifity are routinely introduced, high level of awareness and optimal utilization of examinations currently available are needed to early diagnose this potentially devastating disease.