Search

Benign multicystic peritoneal mesothelioma (BMPM) is a rare condition, particularly in men, and the preoperative diagnosis poses a challenge. Here, we present a case involving single‐incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) for BMPM in a 24‐year‐old man with a pelvic mass and a history of ulcerative colitis. Pelvic imaging revealed multifocal cysts, prompting the performance of SILS. The tumor was successfully resected with no residual lesions, and pathology confirmed the diagnosis of BMPM. This case represents the first documented instance of SILS being employed for BMPM in a man. BMPM, characterized by pelvic multifocal cysts, is a differential diagnosis, and SILS emerges as a viable option for both diagnosis and treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The modified Graham patch repair is a well-established technique for management of perforating foregut injuries, often learned by surgeons during general surgery training. There is, however, little to no data regarding the utilization of this technique for perforation of the distal midgut or in the re-operative field. We present two cases of midgut anastomotic complications successfully managed with modified graham patch repair at our institution. The first case is a 79-year-old female who underwent an emergent right hemicolectomy at an outside institution for management of an iatrogenic perforation during endoscopic polypectomy. Over the course of two years she underwent numerous abdominal operations, due to various complications, ultimately resulting in multiple resections and end ileostomy creation. She then had her ileostomy reversed by laparoscopic single incision (SILS) technique at our institution. This was also complicated by anastomotic leak. Intraoperatively, adequate mobilization of the anastomosis for resection was deemed not safe due to dense fibrosis and adhesions in the re-operative field; therefore, she underwent a SILS modified Graham patch repair of an ileocolic anastomotic defect with diverting loop ileostomy. Post-operatively, she had no radiographic evidence of leak from the repaired anastomosis, which facilitated successful loop ileostomy reversal five months later. Our second case is a 64-year-old male referred to our institution for management of his stage IV colon cancer. He underwent an open right hemicolectomy and hepatic metastectomy, which was complicated by anastomotic leak. The small defect was repaired via a SILS modified Graham patch technique. Five months postoperatively, he had neither radiographic nor endoscopic evidence of a leak; therefore, he successfully underwent ileostomy reversal without complication. We encourage further investigation and reporting of the role of the modified graham patch repair in management of midgut anastomotic complications, particularly when resection and re-anastomosis is unsafe due to a hostile re-operative field. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy of robotic-assisted single-incision-plus-one-port laparoscopic choledochal cyst excision (R-SILC + 1) and single-incision laparoscopic choledochal cyst (SILC) in treating pediatric choledochal cyst (CDC).MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of patients diagnosed with CDC in our hospital from June 2021 to October 2023. Among them, patients underwent either R-SILC + 1 or SILC procedures. Demographic parameters, operative details, and postoperative outcomes were studied.ResultsA total of forty-nine patients were included, with 23 children undergoing R-SILC + 1 and 26 children undergoing SILC. There were no statistically significant differences in demographic data, postoperative pain scores, and postoperative complication rates between the two groups (all p > 0.05). Compared with the SILC group, the R-SILC + 1 group demonstrated less intraoperative bleeding volume (10.4 ± 3.6 vs. 15.0 ± 3.6 ml, p

Although single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) has gained some attention as a feasible alternative to conventional multiport laparoscopic surgery (MPLS) in colonic surgery, it became less prevalent than expected. Hence, we conducted this systematic review to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and oncological outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic colectomy (SILC) with meta-analysis and discussion of the future prospect of SILS. The search was conducted from September to October 2023 using PubMed and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Articles on colorectal cancer comparing SILC with multiport laparoscopic colectomy (MPLC) from all randomized controlled trials and comparative studies with 50 patients or more per arm were examined. The primary outcomes were the intra- and postoperative complication rates, and the secondary outcomes were the perioperative and oncological outcomes. The trends of the SILS number in Japan and the trends of the number of articles on SILS in PubMed were also reviewed. There were no significant differences in perioperative complication rates, operative factors, and oncological outcomes between SILC and MPLC, although heterogeneity was observed mainly in operative factors and the total length of the skin incision was significantly shorter in SILC. Therefore, SILC is technically and oncologically feasible and safe when performed by experienced laparoscopic surgeons. The case number of SILS was gradually increasing but the rate of SILS was decreasing in Japan. The number of articles on SILS was also decreasing. SILS has gained foothold to some extent but has plateaued. The emerging new robotic platform may reappraise the concept of SILS.

Background: There have been few studies regarding the feasibility and safety of pure single-incision laparoscopic total gastrectomy (SITG) or proximal gastrectomy (SIPG) for early gastric cancer (EGC). The purpose of this study was to analyze the surgical outcome of all consecutive SITG or SIPG cases compared with multiport laparoscopic total gastrectomy (MLTG) or proximal gastrectomy (MLPG) for EGC. Methods: We analyzed all consecutive SITG or SIPG cases with double-tract reconstruction for ECG, including the initial case, between March 2013 and December 2021. SITG/SIPG was performed on patients without significant systemic comorbidities through a 3–4 cm vertical transumbilical incision. SITG/SIPG was matched to multiport laparoscopic total or proximal gastrectomy (MLTG/MLPG) cases performed in the same period using a 1:3 propensity score matching, including sex, body mass index (BMI), age and type of resection, year of operation, and institution as covariates. We compared perioperative clinicopathological characteristics and early postoperative morbidity within 1 month after surgery between the SITG/SIPG and MLTG/MLPG groups. Results: In total, 21 patients with SITG and 15 patients with SIPG were compared with those with MLTG (n = 264) and MLPG (n = 220). No conversion to an open or multiport approach occurred in the SITG/SIPG group. After matching, operation time was similar between SITG/SIPG and MLTG/MLPG (223.9 ± 63.5 min vs 234.8 ± 68.7 min, P = 0.402). Length of stay was not significantly different between SITG/SIPG and MLTG/MLPG (11.9 ± 15.4 days vs 8.4 ± 5.0 days, P = 0.210). The average number of retrieved lymph nodes was not significantly different between SITG and MLTG (53.1 ± 16.3 vs 63.2 ± 27.5, P = 0.115), but it was significantly higher in SIPG than MLPG (59.6 ± 27.2 vs 46.0 ± 19.7, P = 0.040). The overall complication rate (30.6% vs 25.9%, P = 0.666) and Clavien–Dindo grade III or higher complication rates (13.9% vs 6.5%, P = 0.175) were not significantly different between the SITG/SIPG and MLTG/MLPG groups. Conclusion: Cautious adoption of SITG/SIPG procedures for EGC is feasible and safe. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: To analyze and compare the clinical efficacy of transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic surgery TAPP(SILS-TAPP) and conventional laparoscopic TAPP(CL-TAPP) in the treatment of senile inguinal hernia. Methods: From January 2019 to June 2021, a total of 221 elderly patients (≥60 years old) with inguinal hernia received SILS-TAPP and CL-TAPP in General Surgery Department of Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University. The perioperative indicators, postoperative complications and follow-up of the two groups were compared to explore the feasibility and superiority of SILS-TAPP in the treatment of inguinal hernia in the elderly. Results: There was no difference in demographic characteristics between the two groups. The mean operation time (28.6 ± 4.2 min vs 28.2 ± 5.3 min) in the SILS-TAPP group was not significantly different from that in the CL-TAPP group (Ρ = 0.623), and there was no significant increase in hospital costs(Ρ = 0.748). The intraoperative blood loss (7.4 ± 3.4 ml), VAS score on the postoperative day (2.2 ± 0.7), mean time of resuming activity (8.2 ± 1.9 h) and mean postoperative hospital stay (0.8 ± 0.2 d) in the SILS-TAPP group were better than those in the CL-TAPP group (Ρ

Abstract Background We compared the surgical outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) and conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS) for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). Methods We performed single-incision gastric wedge resection on prospectively-enrolled 15 consecutive patients with gastric GIST between November 2020 and April 2022 in a single tertiary center. The early perioperative outcomes of these patients were compared to those of patients who underwent CLS. The indications did not differ from those for conventional laparoscopic procedures for gastric GIST. Results In total, 30 patients were assigned to the SILS (n = 15) and CLS (n = 15) groups. There were no significant differences in the estimated blood loss and intraoperative blood transfusion between the SILS and CLS groups. There were no intraoperative complications or conversions to multiple-port or open surgery in the SILS group. Proximally located tumors were more commonly treated with CLS than with SILS (P = 0.045). GISTs located in the greater curvature were more commonly treated with SILS than with CLS, although the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.08). The mean incision length in the SILS group was 4.1 cm shorter than that in the CLS group (3.2 ± 0.7 and 7.3 ± 5.2 cm, respectively, P = 0.01). The postoperative analgesic dose was significantly lower in the SILS than in the CLS group (0.4 ± 1.4 and 2.1 ± 2.3, respectively P = 0.01). Also, the duration of postoperative use of analgesic was shorter in SILS than in CLS (0.4 ± 0.7 and 2.0 ± 1.8, respectively, P = 0.01). There were no significant differences in the early postoperative complications between the groups. Conclusions SILS is as safe, feasible, and effective for the treatment of gastric GIST as CLS with comparable postoperative complications, pain, and cosmesis. Moreover, SILS can be considered without being affected by the type or location of the tumor.

Purpose: Although there have been numerous studies on single-incision laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (SIL-IHR), the short- and long-term outcomes in patients from a large single institution who underwent single-incision laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernioplasty (SIL-TAPP) have rarely been reported. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the short- and long-term outcomes of SIL-TAPP and its safety and feasibility in patients from a large single institution. Methods: The details of 1,054 procedures in 966 patients who underwent SIL-TAPP at the Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University from January 2015 to October 2022 were retrospectively analysed. SIL-TAPP was performed completely through the umbilicus using conventional laparoscopic instruments. Short-term and long-term outcomes of SIL-TAPP were collected by outpatient and telephone follow-ups. In addition, we further compared the operation time, length of postoperative hospital stay, and postoperative complications of patients with simple and complicated unilateral inguinal hernias. Results: A total of 1,054 procedures were performed for 878 unilateral inguinal hernias and 88 bilateral inguinal hernias. In total, there were 803 (76.2%) indirect inguinal hernias, 192 (18.2%) direct inguinal hernias, 51 (4.8%) femoral hernias and 8 (0.8%) combined hernias. The mean operative time was 35.5 ± 17.0 min for unilateral inguinal hernias and 51.9 ± 25.5 min for bilateral inguinal hernias. There was one (0.1%) conversion to two-incision laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernioplasty. No intraoperative haemorrhages, inferior epigastric vessel injury or nerve damage occurred. Postoperative complications were minor and could be resolved without surgical intervention. The mean length of hospital stay was 1.3 ± 0.8 days. The median follow-up was 44 months, no trocar hernia occurred, and there was one (0.1%) recurrence. The operation time in the complicated inguinal hernia group was significantly higher than that in the simple inguinal hernia group (38.9 ± 22.3 vs. 35.0 ± 15.6, p = 0.025). The length of postoperative hospital stay and complication rate of the complicated inguinal hernia group were slightly higher than those of the simple inguinal hernia group, but the difference was not statistically significant. Conclusion: SIL-TAPP is safe and technically feasible, and both short- and long-term outcomes are acceptable. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To analyze and compare the clinical efficacy of transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic surgery TAPP(SILS-TAPP) and conventional laparoscopic TAPP(CL-TAPP) in the treatment of senile inguinal hernia. From January 2019 to June 2021, a total of 221 elderly patients (≥60 years old) with inguinal hernia received SILS-TAPP and CL-TAPP in General Surgery Department of Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University. The perioperative indicators, postoperative complications and follow-up of the two groups were compared to explore the feasibility and superiority of SILS-TAPP in the treatment of inguinal hernia in the elderly. There was no difference in demographic characteristics between the two groups. The mean operation time (28.6 ± 4.2 min vs 28.2 ± 5.3 min) in the SILS-TAPP group was not significantly different from that in the CL-TAPP group (Ρ = 0.623), and there was no significant increase in hospital costs(Ρ = 0.748). The intraoperative blood loss (7.4 ± 3.4 ml), VAS score on the postoperative day (2.2 ± 0.7), mean time of resuming activity (8.2 ± 1.9 h) and mean postoperative hospital stay (0.8 ± 0.2 d) in the SILS-TAPP group were better than those in the CL-TAPP group (Ρ < 0. 05).There was no statistical difference in the overall incidence of intraoperative (Ρ = 0.128) and postoperative complications (Ρ = 0.125) between the two groups. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery TAPP (SILS-TAPP) is feasible and effective in elderly patients, providing a new alternative surgical method for patients who can tolerate general anesthesia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: We compared the surgical outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) and conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS) for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). Methods: We performed single-incision gastric wedge resection on prospectively-enrolled 15 consecutive patients with gastric GIST between November 2020 and April 2022 in a single tertiary center. The early perioperative outcomes of these patients were compared to those of patients who underwent CLS. The indications did not differ from those for conventional laparoscopic procedures for gastric GIST. Results: In total, 30 patients were assigned to the SILS (n = 15) and CLS (n = 15) groups. There were no significant differences in the estimated blood loss and intraoperative blood transfusion between the SILS and CLS groups. There were no intraoperative complications or conversions to multiple-port or open surgery in the SILS group. Proximally located tumors were more commonly treated with CLS than with SILS (P = 0.045). GISTs located in the greater curvature were more commonly treated with SILS than with CLS, although the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.08). The mean incision length in the SILS group was 4.1 cm shorter than that in the CLS group (3.2 ± 0.7 and 7.3 ± 5.2 cm, respectively, P = 0.01). The postoperative analgesic dose was significantly lower in the SILS than in the CLS group (0.4 ± 1.4 and 2.1 ± 2.3, respectively P = 0.01). Also, the duration of postoperative use of analgesic was shorter in SILS than in CLS (0.4 ± 0.7 and 2.0 ± 1.8, respectively, P = 0.01). There were no significant differences in the early postoperative complications between the groups. Conclusions: SILS is as safe, feasible, and effective for the treatment of gastric GIST as CLS with comparable postoperative complications, pain, and cosmesis. Moreover, SILS can be considered without being affected by the type or location of the tumor. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Robotic-assisted single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) is becoming an increasingly widespread field worldwide due to the benefits it brings to both the patient and the surgeon. The goal of this study is to develop a secure robotic solution for SILS, focusing specifically on urology, by identifying and addressing various safety concerns from an early design stage. Starting with the medical tasks and protocols, the technical specifications of the robotic system as well as potential; hazards have been identified. By employing competitive engineering design methods such as Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Risk assessment, and Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA), a safe design solution is proposed. A set of experiments is conducted to validate the proposed concept, and the results strongly support the development of the experimental model. The Finite Element Analysis (FEA) method is applied to validate the mechanical architecture within a set of simulations, demonstrating the compliance of the robotic system with the proposed technical specifications and its capability to safely perform SILS procedures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: The study was performed to verify the results of single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) through the ileostomy site for low rectal cancer compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS). Materials and Methods: From January 2019 to November 2021, 133 patients with low rectal cancer underwent single-incision (n = 27) or conventional (n = 106) methods of low anterior rectal resection surgery with ileostomy. All patients were balanced by propensity score matching for basic information in a ratio of 1:2, resulting in 27 and 54 in SILS and CLS groups, respectively. Results: Relative to the CLS group, the SILS group exhibited fewer leucocyte changes, shorter time to first exhaust and first bowel sounds, shorter length of hospital stay and lower Visual Analogue Score on post-operative days (POD2) and POD3. Intraoperative or post-operative complications or readmissions were comparable between the two groups. The oncologic results remained consistent between the two groups other than the number of lymph nodes dissected in group no. 253. Conclusions: Single-incision laparoscopic low rectal resection surgery through the ileostomy site has advantages in terms of reduced post-operative pain, shorter post-operative exhaust time and length of hospital stay while also achieving oncologic outcomes similar to those of conventional laparoscopy. It can be an alternative procedure for patients with low rectal cancer who require ileostomy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In recent years, there has been an expansion in the development of simulators that use virtual reality (VR) as a learning tool. In surgery where robots are used, VR serves as a revolutionary technology to help medical doctors train in using these robotic systems and accumulate knowledge without risk. This article presents a study in which VR is used to create a simulator designed for robotically assisted single-uniport surgery. The control of the surgical robotic system is achieved using voice commands for laparoscopic camera positioning and via a user interface developed using the Visual Studio program that connects a wristband equipped with sensors attached to the user's hand for the manipulation of the active instruments. The software consists of the user interface and the VR application via the TCP/IP communication protocol. To study the evolution of the performance of this virtual system, 15 people were involved in the experimental evaluation of the VR simulator built for the robotic surgical system, having to complete a medically relevant task. The experimental data validated the initial solution, which will be further developed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) is a recent advancement in minimally invasive techniques for colorectal cancer (CRC). However, SILS is a technically challenging procedure for novice surgeons. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes of SILS for CRC performed by novice surgeons compared with those performed by well‐experienced surgeons. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 1004 consecutive patients with stage I‐IV CRC who underwent SILS between May 2009 and December 2018, using propensity score‐matched analysis. Results After propensity score‐matching, we enrolled 344 patients (n = 172 in each group). Before matching, significant group‐dependent differences were observed in terms of age (P = 0.034) and tumor location (P

Abstract Background The clinical impact of single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) for descending colon cancer (DCC) is unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of SILS for DCC compared with multi-port laparoscopic surgery (MPLS). Methods We retrospectively analyzed 137 consecutive patients with stage I–III DCC who underwent SILS or MPLS at two high-volume multidisciplinary tertiary hospitals between April 2008 and December 2018, using propensity score-matched analysis. Results After propensity score-matching, we enrolled 88 patients (n = 44 in each group). SILS was successful in 97.7% of the matched cohort. Compared with the MPLS group, the SILS group showed significantly less blood loss and a greater number of harvested lymph nodes. Morbidity rates were similar between groups. Recurrence pattern did not differ between groups. No significant differences were found between groups in terms of 3-year disease-free and overall survivals. Conclusion SILS appears safe and feasible and can provide satisfactory oncological outcomes for patients with DCC.

Background: Single-incision laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation for descending colon cancer is technically challenging. Standardization of the surgical procedures is therefore needed. Methods: In a Trendelenburg position with left side elevated, the sigmoid mesocolon is mobilized using a medial-to-lateral approach, and the left colic artery and inferior mesenteric vein (IMV) are divided after radical lymphadenectomy along the inferior mesenteric artery, preserving the superior rectal artery. The descending mesocolon is mobilized from the retroperitoneal planes up to the dorsal surface of the pancreas using medial and lateral approaches. Next, changing the surgical position to a reverse Trendelenburg position with left side elevated, the omental bursa is opened, and the transverse mesocolon is separated from the inferior border of the pancreas. The splenocolic ligament and lateral attachment are then divided, matching the previous medial dissection of the retroperitoneum, and the splenic flexure is fully mobilized. The IMV is divided again at the inferior border of the pancreas. The left branch of the middle colic artery is also divided. Results: Forty-seven consecutive patients with DCC underwent single-incision laparoscopic CME with CVL. One patient required an additional port. Median operative time, blood loss, and number of harvested lymph nodes were 240 min (interquartile range [IQR], 195-257 min), 5 mL (IQR, 5-52 mL), and 21 (IQR, 13-29), respectively. Morbidity rate was 5.9%. Median duration of hospitalization was 9 days (IQR, 7-11 days). Conclusions: Single-incision laparoscopic CME with CVL is safe and feasible for DCC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Total abdominal colectomy with end ileostomy is the first stage of the three-stage surgical treatment of medically refractory ulcerative colitis. Laparoscopic surgery is a safe approach offering several benefits. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery is an alternative minimally invasive approach providing excellent cosmetic results. Literature on single-incision laparoscopic clockwise continuous total abdominal colectomy in the treatment of ulcerative colitis is limited. Aim of the study is to describe our surgical technique and report the outcomes. Methods: Medically refractory ulcerative colitis patients who underwent single-incision laparoscopic clockwise continuous total abdominal colectomy with end ileostomy by a single surgeon between January 2013 and December 2020 at our tertiary care center are included. Patient charts were reviewed retrospectively. Results: 52 patients were included in the final analysis. 51.9% patients were male with the median age of 31.5 years and body mass index of 22.2 kg/m2. Median duration of operation was 100 min with estimated blood loss of 50 ml. There were no intraoperative complications, conversions to conventional laparoscopy or open surgery. Postoperative complications were reported in 13 (25%) patients with most common being ileus (17.3%). 3 patients had surgical site infections. 2 patients had postoperative bleeding requiring blood transfusion. 2 patients had reoperation within postoperative 30 days. Median length of hospital stay was 2 days. No mortalities were reported. Conclusion: Single-incision laparoscopic clockwise continuous approach is safe and effective in ulcerative colitis patients undergoing total abdominal colectomy with end ileostomy. Further prospective randomized studies are warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: In surgery for colorectal cancer, dissection of the lymph nodes and fatty tissue around the root of the inferior mesenteric artery is important from an oncologic point of view. However, it is debatable whether it is better to preserve or remove the left colic artery (LCA). This study aimed to compare D3 lymphadenectomy with versus without LCA preservation in single‐incision laparoscopic surgery for sigmoid and rectosigmoid cancer. Methods: A total of 1138 patients underwent surgery for colorectal cancer between April 2011 and December 2018 at Fukui Prefectural Hospital. This propensity score‐matched retrospective study analyzed the data of 163 patients: 42 patients with LCA preservation (group A) and 129 without LCA preservation (group B). Clinical and oncological outcomes were compared between the two groups. Results: There were no significant differences between groups A and B in patient characteristics, surgical outcomes, including the 5‐year overall survival rate (75% vs. 64.2%, hazard ratio [HR] 1.34, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.37–4.30), 5‐year disease‐free survival rate (85.7% vs. 85.7%, HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.24–4.22), and 5‐year cancer‐specific survival rate (92.8% vs. 89.3%, HR 1.50, 95% CI 0.25–11.4). Conclusion: There were no significant differences in the short‐ and long‐term outcomes of patients who underwent single‐incision laparoscopic surgery with D3 lymphadenectomy with versus without LCA preservation. This suggests that LCA preservation is safe and feasible in single‐incision laparoscopic surgery for sigmoid and rectosigmoid colon cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Erythropoietic protoporphyria (EPP) is a rare hereditary subtype of cutaneous porphyria characterized by photosensitivity. Increased exposure to light irradiation may precipitate acute liver failure, and surgical light‐induced intestinal burns and perforations are known to occur. We report a case of EPP in a patient who underwent laparoscopic partial cecectomy for appendiceal mucocele. A 55‐year‐old man with EPP was presented for treatment of appendiceal mucocele. A light test using two types of laparoscopes (Companies O and S) was performed preoperatively. Light from the laparoscope manufactured by Company O caused photosensitivity; this effect was not observed with light from the laparoscope manufactured by Company S. Therefore, we performed laparoscopic partial cecectomy through a single umbilical incision using the laparoscope from Company S. Except for the incision site, the patient's skin was completely covered using surgical drapes. No intra‐ or postoperative complications were observed. Histopathological examination of the resected specimen revealed a low‐grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) is a recent advancement in minimally invasive techniques for colorectal cancer (CRC). However, SILS is a technically challenging procedure for novice surgeons. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes of SILS for CRC performed by novice surgeons compared with those performed by well‐experienced surgeons. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 1004 consecutive patients with stage I‐IV CRC who underwent SILS between May 2009 and December 2018, using propensity score‐matched analysis. Results: After propensity score‐matching, we enrolled 344 patients (n = 172 in each group). Before matching, significant group‐dependent differences were observed in terms of age (P = 0.034) and tumor location (P < 0.001). After matching, preoperative clinical factors were similar between groups, but operative time was longer in the Novice group (213 vs 171 min, P < 0.001). Other operative factors and morbidity rates did not differ significantly between groups. The number of harvested lymph nodes was smaller in the Novice group (23 vs 25, P = 0.040), and the number of patients with lymph node metastases was smaller in the Novice group (57 vs 86, P = 0.002). The 3‐year disease‐free survival rate was 85.8% in the Novice group and 89.9% in the Experienced group (P = 0.512). Three‐year overall survival rate was 92.2% in the Novice group and 90.0% in the Experienced group (P = 0.899). Conclusion: SILS for CRC was safely performed by novice surgeons under the guidance of well‐experienced surgeons, and could provide satisfactory oncological outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The clinical impact of single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) for descending colon cancer (DCC) is unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of SILS for DCC compared with multi-port laparoscopic surgery (MPLS). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 137 consecutive patients with stage I–III DCC who underwent SILS or MPLS at two high-volume multidisciplinary tertiary hospitals between April 2008 and December 2018, using propensity score-matched analysis. Results: After propensity score-matching, we enrolled 88 patients (n = 44 in each group). SILS was successful in 97.7% of the matched cohort. Compared with the MPLS group, the SILS group showed significantly less blood loss and a greater number of harvested lymph nodes. Morbidity rates were similar between groups. Recurrence pattern did not differ between groups. No significant differences were found between groups in terms of 3-year disease-free and overall survivals. Conclusion: SILS appears safe and feasible and can provide satisfactory oncological outcomes for patients with DCC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Single-port laparoscopic duodenojejunostomy employing semi-Kocherization performed for a patient with superior mesenteric artery (SMA) syndrome is presented in this report. A 24-year-old woman missed meals due to work pressure, and her body weight decreased from 42 kg to 27 kg within 6 months. After this severe weight loss, she suffered from postprandial abdominal pain. An enhanced computed tomography revealed that the aortomesenteric angle was 11° (narrow), and the distance was short at 4.5 mm. Duodenography also revealed dilatation of the proximal duodenum. These findings led to a diagnosis of SMA syndrome, and we performed single-port laparoscopic duodenojejunostomy. We first dissected the fusion between the duodenum and transverse mesocolon, such as Kocherization, enough to mobilize the duodenum; this procedure was termed semi-Kocherization. A gauze was placed in the dissected space for a landmark from the transverse mesocolon side. We confirmed the gauze at the duodenum’s lateral side, then opened the transverse mesocolon, and pulled the duodenum out. We performed side-to-side duodenojejunostomy. The postoperative course was unremarkable, and she gained 4 kg within 2 months of discharge. Semi-Kocherization is shown to be an effective technique to increase duodenal mobility for performing anastomosis, and single-port laparoscopic surgery can reduce wounds and increase cosmesis.

Objective To investigate the safety and feasibility of transumbilical single-incision laparoscopy in radical operation for right colonic cancer. Methods A retrospective study was conducted in 60 patients who underwent laparosco-pic radical right hemicolectomy for colonic cancer from January 2019 to June 2020 in Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery Changshu Second People’s Hospital combined with Department of Surgery Ruijin Hospital Shanghai. The patients were divided into group of single-incision laparoscopic surgery(SILS) (n=30) and group of conventional five-port laparoscopic surgery(CLS) (n=30). Patient demographics, operative details and postoperative complications were compared between two groups. Results No significant differences were observed in length of incision, intraoperative blood loss, largest diameter of tumor, postoperative feeding time, extraction time of drainage tube, postoperative hospital stay, pathologic stage and lymph node harvest between SILS group and CLS group. Compared with CLS group, SILS group showed that all longer operative time [(185.17±12.28) min vs. (127.83±16.70) min], lower mean pain score (visual analog scale) [(3.30±0.79) vs. (3.97±0.72)] on the first postoperative day and earlier postoperative evacuation time [(2.70±0.54) d vs. (3.97±0.49) d)] with statistical significant difference (P0.05). One case with postoperative anastomotic leakage in both SILS group and CLS group (P>0.05). No tumor recurrence was present in 2 groups during the period of follow-up (11.0±0.6) months. Conclusions Clinical efficacy in single-incision laparoscopy would be similar to CLS for radical resection of right colonic cancer.

Background: Appendicitis is one of the common pathologies encountered in surgical practice. Except in minority of the cases, the treatment is usually surgical. Till recent past, open appendectomy has been the procedure of choice for appendicitis. With increasing expertise in laparoscopic surgeries more and more surgeons are utilizing the laparoscopic approach for appendectomy. Laparoscopic surgeries have distinct advantages such as less surgical trauma, improved and quick postoperative recovery, and esthetic results. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) is rapidly gaining acceptability in young population because of its cosmetic advantages. Moreover, these surgeries also avoid the risk of port-site hernias and the possibility of wound infection. Aims and Objective: The purpose of this study is to present our initial experience with this surgery using a single incision laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) using conventional instruments. Materials and Methods: This was a prospective cohort study conducted in the department of surgery of a tertiary care medical college situated in an urban area. The duration of the study was 2 years. All adult patients diagnosed to be having uncomplicated appendicitis and undergoing appendectomy by SILS were included in this study on the basis of a predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Pre-operative data collected included age, sex, weight, duration of complaint, concomitant medical conditions (like ischemic heart disease, chronic obstructive airway disease, diabetes mellitus, pancreatitis, and liver cirrhosis) and previous upper or lower abdominal surgery. All patients were treated by SILS except 1 patient in whom the procedure was converted to open surgery. Mean surgical time, Intraoperative procedure details and postoperative complications were studied in all the cases. p < 0.05 was taken as statistically significant. Statistical analysis was done using SSPS 21.0 software. Results: Out of 30 patients in this study 26 patients were female and 4 patients were male. The male to female ratio was found to be 1:6.15. Mean age of studied cases was found to be 26.2 years. Operative time required for the first 15 cases in an average was 120.00 min however it was reduced for the next 15 cases was 73.73 min. Overall time required in an average was 96.86 min. Out of 30 cases, The procedure was completed with Single Incision LA in 23 Patients, i.e., 76.6 %. In the initial cases, we started with two 5 mm and one 10mm port. To reduce crowding we replaced the 5 mm port to 3 mm port. The 10 mm port was also replaced by 5 mm in the past few cases in 1 patient the procedure was converted to open surgery. The analysis of postoperative complications showed that five patients had Post-Operative wound Infection. One patient had post-operative peritonitis. Conclusion: SILS is a feasible and safe surgical method for appendectomy and is being increasingly preferred particularly by young patients due to its excellent cosmetic results.

30973388 3 Chatzizacharias NA, Dajani K, Koong JK, Jah A. The role of the single incision laparoscopic approach in liver and pancreatic resectional surgery. The high lymph node retrieval numbers and low lymph node ratios (22, 15, and 24; 0.091, 0.067, and 0.042 on Patient No. 1, 2, and 3 respectively) revealed the qualified D2 lymph node dissections during the SILPD.[4] A low threshold of procedure conversion should be kept in mind for patient and oncologic safety. Keywords: Distal cholangiocarcinoma; Single-incision laparoscopic surgery; Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; Pancreatoduodenectomy; Whipple procedure EN Distal cholangiocarcinoma Single-incision laparoscopic surgery Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma Pancreatoduodenectomy Whipple procedure 2402 2408 7 11/10/22 20221101 NES 221101 Previous Presentation: This report was presented in part at the 32 nd World Congress of International Association of Surgeons, Gastroenterologists and Oncologists (IASGO) in Taipei, Taiwan, November 20-22, 2021. 5 A In a multi-incision laparoscopic surgery, the instruments make a loop with transverse and vertical movements. [Extracted from the article]

Background: We developed laparoscopic transfistulous bile duct exploration (LTBDE) for Mirizzi syndrome (MS) McSherry type II in September 2011. Then, single-incision LTBDE (SILTBDE) was adopted as a preferred technique since August 2013. This retrospective study aims to analyze the outcome of LTBDE in 7.7 years and to compare SILTBDE with four-incision LTBDE (4ILTBDE). Methods: Seventeen consecutive patients underwent LTBDE for MS McSherry type II from September 2011 to May 2019. Transfistulous removal of the impacted stone(s), choledochoscopic bile duct exploration, and primary closure of the gallbladder remnant were performed without biliary drainage. Results: The sex ratio is 12:5 (male: female) with an average age of 39.4 ± 10.3 (24–56) years. Ten patients (58.8%) had their diagnoses of MS established by preoperative imaging. According to the Csendes classification, three type II (17.6%), nine type III (52.9%), and five type IV (29.4%) were identified. The operative time was 264.8 ± 60.3 min (156–358 min). The stone clearance rate was 100%. The postoperative hospital stay was 4.7 ± 1.9 (2–10) days. No procedure was converted to an open operation. Two postoperative transient hyperamylasemia (11.8%) and one superficial wound infection (5.9%) occurred and all recovered well under conservative treatment (Clavien-Dindo grade I). During an average 2.2-year follow-up period, no biliary stricture or stone recurrence occurred. No significant difference exists between the SILTBDE and 4ILTBDE groups. Nevertheless, an insignificant trend of shorter postoperative hospital stay was observed in the former. A diagnosis of MS Csendes type IV implicates prolonged total and postoperative hospital stays (p < 0.01). Conclusions: LTBDE is safe and efficacious for MS McSherry type II. It provides a simple solution for various types of MS and avoids undesirable complications following bilioenteric anastomosis. SILTBDE is comparable to 4ILTBDE for selected patients. Patients with MS Csendes type IV need more time to recover after surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: There are little data concerning the long-term outcome of single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) for colon cancer. Therefore, we investigated not only the short-term outcomes but also the long-term outcomes of SILS for right-side colon cancer. Methods: We retrospectively compared short- and long-term outcomes of SILS and conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS) for right-sided colon cancer in our institution. Intergroup differences of short-term outcomes were evaluated using χ2 or Fisher exact tests and 2-sample Student t tests. The disease-free survival rates (long-term outcome) of stage II and III patients were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using log-rank tests. Results: There were 290 operations conducted for right-side (cecum and ascending) colorectal cancers from April 2011 to July 2018. Open surgery was performed in 12 cases from start to the operation. SILS was performed in 196 cases and CLS in 55 cases. One patient underwent intraoperative conversion from SILS to laparotomy for bleeding control. In addition, 1 port was added to SILS in 3 cases. These 4 cases were included in the analysis as the SILS group according to the principle of intent to treat. Background: Factors including age, gender, body mass index, performance status, and tumor stage were not statistically different between the SILS and CLS groups. In short-term outcomes, the number of harvested lymph nodes was not statistically different. SILS required less operating time (p < 0.001) and resulted in a reduced bleeding volume (p < 0.001). There was no statistical difference in the frequency of overall complications (p = 0.06). The disease-free survival of stage II and III patients was not statistically different between the 2 groups. Conclusions: With the proper adaptation of SILS by an experienced surgeon, the short- and long-term outcomes of SILS were not inferior to those of CLS. Therefore, SILS could be a treatment option for right-sided colon cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The paper presents the singularity analysis and the geometric optimization of a 6-DOF (Degrees of Freedom) parallel robot for SILS (Single-Incision Laparoscopic Surgery). Based on a defined set of input/output constraint equations, the singularities of the parallel robotic system are determined and geometrically interpreted. Then, the geometric parameters (e.g., the lengths of the mechanism links) for the 6-DOF parallel robot for SILS are optimized such that the robotic system complies with an operational workspace defined in correlation with the SILS task. A numerical analysis of the singularities showed that the operational workspace is singularity free. Furthermore, numerical simulations validate the parallel robot for the next developing stages (e.g., designing and prototyping stages). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To compare the efficacy of robotic-assisted single-incision-plus-one-port laparoscopic choledochal cyst excision (R-SILC + 1) and single-incision laparoscopic choledochal cyst (SILC) in treating pediatric choledochal cyst (CDC)., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of patients diagnosed with CDC in our hospital from June 2021 to October 2023. Among them, patients underwent either R-SILC + 1 or SILC procedures. Demographic parameters, operative details, and postoperative outcomes were studied., Results: A total of forty-nine patients were included, with 23 children undergoing R-SILC + 1 and 26 children undergoing SILC. There were no statistically significant differences in demographic data, postoperative pain scores, and postoperative complication rates between the two groups (all p  > 0.05). Compared with the SILC group, the R-SILC + 1 group demonstrated less intraoperative bleeding volume (10.4 ± 3.6 vs. 15.0 ± 3.6 ml, p  < 0.05), a shorter indwelling time of the abdominal drainage tube [5(5,6) vs. 7(5.8,8.3) d, p  < 0.05], a shorter postoperative fasting time [4(3,4) vs. 6(5,7) d, p  < 0.05], and a shorter postoperative discharge time [6(6,7) vs. 8(6,11) d, p  < 0.05]. However, the R-SILC + 1 group had a longer operation time [388(295,415) vs. 341(255.8,375.2) min, p  < 0.05] and higher hospitalization cost (7.9 ± 0.4 vs. 3.2 ± 0.3 ten thousand, p  < 0.05)., Conclusion: Compared with the SILC group, the R-SILC + 1 group demonstrated clear advantages in treating pediatric CDC, but it is associated with a prolonged learning curve and operation time, and high costs. With improvements in physician experience and technological advancements, its potential will be further unleashed., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (© 2024 Zhang, Chen, Lin, Wang, Qiu and Li.)

BackgroundTraditional open gastric cancer surgery has evolved from porous to reduced-hole, single-hole, or even natural cavity surgery to laparoscopic surgery, due to the continuous development of minimally invasive concepts and medical technologies, as well as awareness for the concept of rapid recovery. Conventional laparoscopic radical gastrectomy is quite mature in age at the moment, but how to progress to minimally invasive surgery without increasing the difficulty of surgery while ensuring clinical safety and feasibility is worth further investigation. Therefore, the clinical safety and feasibility of reduced port laparoscopic radical gastrectomy were assessed in this study.MethodsInformation on the clinical data of patients undergoing laparoscopic radical gastric cancer surgery in a single centre between May 2020 and May 2022 was collected, and a total of 232 patients were included in this study according to the study protocol design. The clinical data of 232 patients with gastric cancer treated by two different surgical methods, namely, reduced port laparoscopic surgery (RPLS) or conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS), were retrospectively analysed. The intraoperative indices, postoperative pathological indices, and short-term postoperative complications (within 30 days) of the two different surgical methods were evaluated, as well as the surgical methods’ feasibility and short-term postoperative recovery effect.ResultsThere was no significant difference between the general data of patients with RPLS and CLS (P > 0.05). Compared with CLSG, the operation time, digestive tract reconstruction time and lymph node dissection time of RPLSG are shorter. The intraoperative blood loss was less, and the incision was minimally invasive (P 0.05).ConclusionsThe treatment of gastric cancer with RPLS has good safety, feasibility and short-term postoperative effects, which is in line with the implementation of the modern concept of rapid rehabilitation surgery.

In recent years, there has been an expansion in the development of simulators that use virtual reality (VR) as a learning tool. In surgery where robots are used, VR serves as a revolutionary technology to help medical doctors train in using these robotic systems and accumulate knowledge without risk. This article presents a study in which VR is used to create a simulator designed for robotically assisted single-uniport surgery. The control of the surgical robotic system is achieved using voice commands for laparoscopic camera positioning and via a user interface developed using the Visual Studio program that connects a wristband equipped with sensors attached to the user’s hand for the manipulation of the active instruments. The software consists of the user interface and the VR application via the TCP/IP communication protocol. To study the evolution of the performance of this virtual system, 15 people were involved in the experimental evaluation of the VR simulator built for the robotic surgical system, having to complete a medically relevant task. The experimental data validated the initial solution, which will be further developed.

Introduction: Single‐incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) for colon cancer is a recent innovation in minimally invasive surgery that can improve short‐term outcome. However, several biases exist in current favorable comparisons of SILS with conventional laparoscopic (CL) surgery. Moreover, the oncological outcomes in SILS remain unclear. The aim of this study was to identify outcomes following SILS and CL for right colectomy using a propensity score‐matched analysis. Methods: A total of 553 patients underwent curative resection for right colon cancer (58 SILS and 495 CL). After propensity score matching, 58 patients in each group were matched. Results: Before matching, median age was younger (p = 0.037) and clinical stage was lower (p < 0.001) in the SILS group. After matching, operation time was shorter (172 versus 193 min, p = 0.007) and blood loss was less (12 versus 20 mL, p = 0.037) in the SILS group. Most of the SILS cases were performed (43.1%) or supervised (51.7%) by an expert surgeon. Median follow‐up duration was 30 and 37 mo in the SILS and CL groups, respectively. Three‐year relapse‐free survival was 92.5% and 92.4% (p = 0.781); and overall survival was 100% versus 98.1% (p = 0.177). Conclusions: Under the control of expert surgeons, SILS appeared to be a safe and feasible approach and had similar oncological outcomes compared with CL in a propensity score‐matched cohort of patients with right‐sided colon cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) for rectal cancer is technically challenging, and its clinical impact is unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes of SILS for rectal cancer compared with multi-port laparoscopic surgery (MPLS). Patients and methods: We retrospectively analyzed 357 consecutive patients with stage I–III rectal cancer located in the rectosigmoid or upper rectum who underwent SILS or MPLS between January 2012 and December 2016, using propensity score-matched analysis. Results: After propensity score-matching, we enrolled 204 patients (n = 102 per group). Before matching, significant group-dependent differences were observed in tumor location (p < 0.001). After matching, preoperative clinical factors were similar between groups. SILS was successful in 73.5% of cases, an additional port was required in 23.5%, and 2.9% were converted to open surgery. Compared to the MPLS group, the SILS group showed shorter operative time (192 vs. 211 min, p = 0.015) and shorter postoperative hospital stay (9 vs. 11 days, p = 0.038). Other operative factors and morbidity rates did not differ significantly between groups. The number of harvested lymph nodes was smaller in the SILS group (24) than in the MPLS group (27, p = 0.008). Postoperative recurrence did not differ between groups, either before or after matching. No significant differences in 3-year disease-free, 3-year local recurrence-free, or 5-year overall survival were found between groups. Conclusions: SILS is safe, is feasible, and offers satisfactory oncological outcomes in selected patients with rectosigmoid or upper rectal cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Single-port access (SPA) laparoscopic surgery and vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) have many advantages. The objective of the present study is to compare patient characteristics, operative details, and postoperative outcomes between the two surgical methods. Patients who were planned to undergo vNOTES or SPA laparoscopic surgery between April 2020 and June 2021 were prospectively enrolled. The surgical method was determined by a single surgeon after imaging results evaluation and a physical exam. Those who had favorable pelvic conditions without any evidence of adhesion were scheduled for vNOTES. A total of 33 patients underwent a vNOTES hysterectomy while 40 patients received a SPA laparoscopic hysterectomy. All surgeries were performed by one surgeon. The proportion of the patients who had a history of vaginal delivery was significantly higher in the vNOTES group. The operative time for port installation was significantly longer in the vNOTES group, but the total operative time was shorter compared to the SPA group. The postoperative pain scores 12 h after the operations were also significantly lower in the vNOTES group. Other surgical outcomes were comparable between the two groups. The present study demonstrated that the early operative outcomes of vNOTES hysterectomy were comparable to those of SPA hysterectomy. It also highlights the importance of adequate patient selection when determining surgical methods based on imaging results and physical examinations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal hernia repair (TEP) is a widely used treatment for inguinal hernia. Single-incision laparoscopic TEP (SILTEP) has attracted the attention of several surgeons, given its superior cosmetic results and patient satisfaction, as well as comparable outcomes to multiport surgery. Nonetheless, no relevant studies have evaluated the learning curve (LC) of SILTEP in terms of both operation time (OT) and surgical failure. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the LC of SILTEP for inguinal hernia. Methods: Medical records of 180 patients who underwent SILTEP performed by a single surgeon from a single institution between October 2012 and November 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. The LC was analyzed using the moving average method and cumulative sum control chart (CUSUM) for OT and surgical failure. Surgical failure was defined as the need for additional ports, open conversion, severe postoperative complications (Clavien–Dindo ≥ IIIa), and recurrence. Eight patients who underwent combined surgery or bilateral hernia repair were excluded from the OT analysis. Results: From CUSUM graphs, the study period was divided into three phases: OT-phases 1 (1st–32nd), 2 (33rd–83rd), and 3 (84th–172nd) for OT and failure-phases 1 (1st–29th), 2 (30th–58th), and 3 (59th–180th) for surgical failure. Mean OTs were statistically different in the three OT phases (64.6 vs. 50.8 vs. 35.2 min; p < 0.001). Open conversion (31.0% vs. 0% vs. 2.5%) and additional port insertion (6.9% vs. 24.1% vs. 2.5%) stabilized consecutively at failure-phases 2 and 3 (p < 0.001). Surgical failure rates decreased to 5.7% by failure-phase 3 (37.9% vs. 24.1% vs. 5.7%; p < 0.001). Conclusion: For an experienced laparoscopic surgeon, we estimated that approximately 60 cases are needed to overcome the LC for SILTEP in terms of both reducing OT and achieving a surgical failure rate < 10%. Further proficiency could be achieved after approximately 85 SILTEP procedures with a stable OT of approximately 35 min. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background We have introduced the Senhance Digital Laparoscopy System and actively use for colorectal cancer surgery. Recently, we also try to perform surgery by reduce port as less invasive method. For the first time, we report a case of single-incision plus one-port transverse colectomy using Senhance system. Case presentation The case was a 57-year-old woman, diagnosed with transverse colon cancer referred to our department. The preoperative diagnosis was cT1bN0M0, Stage I. We performed single-incision plus one-port transverse colon resection using Senhance system without any problems. The operative time was 203 min and the blood loss was 35 ml. Conclusion We report the first case of single-incision plus one-port transverse colectomy using Senhance system. We trust this approach will find increasing use, enabling a safer means of minimally invasive robotic surgery.

Background: Studies find similar perioperative outcomes between single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) and conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS) for colon cancer. However, few have reported long-term outcomes of SILS versus CLS. We aimed to compare long-term postoperative and oncologic outcomes as well as perioperative outcomes between SILS and CLS for colon cancer. Methods: A total of 641 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer from July 2009 to September 2014 were eligible for the study. Data from 300 of these patients were used for analysis after propensity score-matching (n = 150 per group). Variables associated with short- and long-term outcomes were analyzed. Results: The SILS group had a shorter mean total incision length, less postoperative pain, and a similar mean rate of incisional hernia (2.7% versus 3.3%) compared with the CLS group. The 7-year overall and disease-free survival rates were 92.7% versus 94% (p = 0.673) and 85.3% versus 84.7% (p = 0.688) in the SILS and CLS groups, respectively. Conclusions: Compared with CLS, SILS for colon cancer appeared to be safe in terms of perioperative and long-term postoperative and oncologic outcomes. The results suggested that SILS is a reasonable treatment option for colon cancer for a selected group of patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Epidermoid cyst arising from the cecum is extremely rare. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery is the latest innovation in minimally invasive surgery, and shortens incisions, improves cosmesis, and reduces postoperative pain. We report here the first description of a patient with epidermoid cyst of the cecum treated by ileocecal resection by single-incision laparoscopic surgery. Case presentation A 20-year-old woman presented to our hospital with abdominal pain in the right lower quadrant. Abdominal contrast-enhanced computed tomography showed a 56 × 35-mm cystic mass in the ileocecal area. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a 56 × 43-mm, T1-hypointense, T2-hyperintense mass attached to the cecum. Gastrointestinal tumor or duplication cyst was suspected, and ileocecal resection was performed using single-incision laparoscopic surgery. Intraoperative examination showed the tumor as a round, whitish mass arising from the cecum. Operation time was 162 min, and intraoperative blood loss was 10 ml. Macroscopic examination showed a 56 × 45-mm elastic-hard, whitish, round mass arising from the cecal wall. Microscopic examination revealed the cyst wall lined by keratinized stratified squamous epithelium. No malignant findings were identified. The final diagnosis was epidermoid cyst of the cecum. The postoperative course was uneventful and she was discharged on postoperative day 5. Conclusions A rare case of cecal epidermoid cyst is reported. Single-incision laparoscopic colectomy using an organ retractor represents a promising option for treating cecal epidermoid cyst.

Background: Long-term outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic colectomy (SILC) for colon cancer (CC), as practiced in real-world settings, especially in relation to disease stage, have not been established. We examined, retrospectively, both short- and long-term outcomes of SILC versus those of multiport laparoscopic colectomy (MPLC) performed for CC in a propensity-score-matched cohort. Methods: The study involved 263 patient pairs matched 1:1 from among 691 patients who, between January 2008 and May 2014, underwent either SILC or MPLC for a primary solitary CC at our hospital. Short-term and long-term operative outcomes were compared between the two groups. Results: Operation time was the only surgical outcome that varied significantly between the two groups (p = 0.0004). Overall 5-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) in the SILC group was 93.7 (95% CI 89.6–96.2)%, and CSS per pathological stage (I, II and III) was 98.5 (90.0–99.8)%, 96.0 (88.2–98.7)%, and 88.3 (79.6–93.6)%, respectively, whereas overall 5-year CSS in the MPLC group was 93.3 (89.4–95.9)%, and CSS per pathological stage was 100%, 95.4 (88.3–98.3)%, and 84.1 (74.1–90.8)% (p = 0.5278, 0.2679, 0.7666, and 0.9073), respectively. Overall 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) in the SILC group was 94.0 (90.2–96.4)%, and 3-year DFS per pathological stage was 98.6 (90.4–99.8)%, 90.1 (81.4–95.0)%, and 79.0 (69.4–86.2)%, respectively, whereas overall 3-year DFS in the MPLC group was 93.2 (89.4–95.7)%, and 3-year DFS per pathological disease stage was 100%, 94.5 (87.4–97.7)% and 75.5 (64.7–83.8)% (p = 0.2829, 0.7401, 0.4335 and 0.8518), respectively. Thus, oncological outcomes did not differ significantly between groups. Incisional hernia occurred in 21 (8.0%) SILC group patients and 17 (6.5%) MPLC group patients, without a significant between-group difference (p = 0.6139). Conclusion: Our data indicate that perioperative and oncological outcomes of SILC performed for CC are comparable to those of MPLC performed for CC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Single-port laparoscopic duodenojejunostomy employing semi-Kocherization performed for a patient with superior mesenteric artery (SMA) syndrome is presented in this report. A 24-year-old woman missed meals due to work pressure, and her body weight decreased from 42 kg to 27 kg within 6 months. After this severe weight loss, she suffered from postprandial abdominal pain. An enhanced computed tomography revealed that the aortomesenteric angle was 11° (narrow), and the distance was short at 4.5 mm. Duodenography also revealed dilatation of the proximal duodenum. These findings led to a diagnosis of SMA syndrome, and we performed single-port laparoscopic duodenojejunostomy. We first dissected the fusion between the duodenum and transverse mesocolon, such as Kocherization, enough to mobilize the duodenum; this procedure was termed semi-Kocherization. A gauze was placed in the dissected space for a landmark from the transverse mesocolon side. We confirmed the gauze at the duodenum's lateral side, then opened the transverse mesocolon, and pulled the duodenum out. We performed side-to-side duodenojejunostomy. The postoperative course was unremarkable, and she gained 4 kg within 2 months of discharge. Semi-Kocherization is shown to be an effective technique to increase duodenal mobility for performing anastomosis, and single-port laparoscopic surgery can reduce wounds and increase cosmesis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Appendicitis is one of the common pathologies encountered in surgical practice. Except in minority of the cases, the treatment is usually surgical. Till recent past, open appendectomy has been the procedure of choice for appendicitis. With increasing expertise in laparoscopic surgeries more and more surgeons are utilizing the laparoscopic approach for appendectomy. Laparoscopic surgeries have distinct advantages such as less surgical trauma, improved and quick postoperative recovery, and esthetic results. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) is rapidly gaining acceptability in young population because of its cosmetic advantages. Moreover, these surgeries also avoid the risk of port-site hernias and the possibility of wound infection. Aims and Objective: The purpose of this study is to present our initial experience with this surgery using a single incision laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) using conventional instruments. Materials and Methods: This was a prospective cohort study conducted in the department of surgery of a tertiary care medical college situated in an urban area. The duration of the study was 2 years. All adult patients diagnosed to be having uncomplicated appendicitis and undergoing appendectomy by SILS were included in this study on the basis of a predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Pre-operative data collected included age, sex, weight, duration of complaint, concomitant medical conditions (like ischemic heart disease, chronic obstructive airway disease, diabetes mellitus, pancreatitis, and liver cirrhosis) and previous upper or lower abdominal surgery. All patients were treated by SILS except 1 patient in whom the procedure was converted to open surgery. Mean surgical time, Intraoperative procedure details and postoperative complications were studied in all the cases. p < 0.05 was taken as statistically significant. Statistical analysis was done using SSPS 21.0 software. Results: Out of 30 patients in this study 26 patients were female and 4 patients were male. The male to female ratio was found to be 1:6.15. Mean age of studied cases was found to be 26.2 years. Operative time required for the first 15 cases in an average was 120.00 min however it was reduced for the next 15 cases was 73.73 min. Overall time required in an average was 96.86 min. Out of 30 cases, The procedure was completed with Single Incision LA in 23 Patients, i.e., 76.6 %. In the initial cases, we started with two 5 mm and one 10mm port. To reduce crowding we replaced the 5 mm port to 3 mm port. The 10 mm port was also replaced by 5 mm in the past few cases in 1 patient the procedure was converted to open surgery. The analysis of postoperative complications showed that five patients had Post-Operative wound Infection. One patient had post-operative peritonitis. Conclusion: SILS is a feasible and safe surgical method for appendectomy and is being increasingly preferred particularly by young patients due to its excellent cosmetic results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Objective: To analyze the benefit and feasibility of single-incisional laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal (SIL TEP) repair compared with those of conventional laparoscopic TEP (CL TEP). Methods: The procedure of laparoscopic herniorrhaphy includes medial, lateral, and sac dissection with mesh positioning. The actual procedure performed during SIL TEP is the same as those of CL TEP, except for the number of incisions. We performed SIL TEP in 23 patients with an inguinal hernia. The operative and short-term outcomes, including postoperative complications and recurrence, were analyzed and compared with 140 cases of CL TEP. Results: Age, gender, BMI, comorbidity, ASA score, and types of hernia were similar in both groups. Also, operation time, open or transabdominal preperitoneal conversion rate, length of hospital stay, postoperative complication rate, and recurrence were not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusion: SIL TEP is as feasible and safe a procedure as laparoscopic herniorrhaphy. Surgeons familiar with single-incision laparoscopic surgeries like appendectomy or cholecystectomy can begin to perform SIL TEP for hernia repair. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]