Search

Patients with primary tumor progression after stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have a second chance at complete tumor eradication with salvage local therapies, including lung resection, repeat course of SBRT, and percutaneous ablative therapies. In this paper, we presented our institutions initial experience with percutaneous high-dose-rate (HDR) brachyablation for a relapsed stage I NSCLC that had been treated with SBRT 4.3 years earlier. Lung tumor measuring approximately 5 cm in maximum tumor dimension at the time of relapse was histopathologically confirmed to be persistent squamous cell carcinoma, and successfully treated with a single fraction of 24 Gy with HDR brachyablation. Treatment was delivered via two percutaneous catheters inserted under CT-guidance, and treated in less than 20 minutes. The patient was discharged home later the same day without the need for a chest tube, and has been monitored with serial surveillance scans every 3 to 6 months without evidence of further lung cancer progression or complications at 2.8 years post-HDR brachyablation procedure and 7.8 years after initial SBRT.

Purpose: In patients with oligometastatic disease (OMD) treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), those who develop brain metastases (BrM) may have poor outcomes. We aimed to investigate variables associated with BrM development in this population. Methods: Patients with ≤ 5 extracranial metastases from solid tumors treated with SBRT from 2008 to 2016 at Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre were included. We investigated the association between covariates and CIBrM (cumulative incidence of BrM) using Fine-Gray analysis, and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) using Cox regression. We investigated the association between extracranial progression and CIBrM using time-based conditional analysis. Results: Among 404 patients, the most common primary sites were lung, colorectal, prostate, breast and kidney. Median follow-up was 49 months. Median PFS was 25 months. Median OS was 70 months. 58 patients developed BrM, and 5-year CIBrM was 16%. On multivariable analysis, number of extracranial metastases, location of metastases, total planning target volume (PTV), and time from primary diagnosis to OMD were not associated with CIBrM, although several of these variables were associated with extracranial PFS and OS. Primary site was associated with CIBrM, with colorectal and prostate cancer associated with lower CIBrM compared to lung cancer. Widespread extracranial progression (≥ 5 sites) within 24, 36, 48 and 60 months of OMD diagnosis was independently associated with higher CIBrM. Conclusion: In patients with OMD treated with SBRT, baseline variables related to extracranial disease burden and distribution were not associated with BrM development, while primary site and widespread extracranial progression were associated with BrM development. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: This study aims to investigate the prognostic impact of ground-glass opacity (GGO)-component in early-stage lung cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Methods: From January 2013 to December 2022, 239 early-stage lung cancer patients (T1-2N0M0) underwent SBRT. They were categorized into two groups based on the presence of GGO-component: 65 patients in the subsolid group with a consolidation tumor ratio (CTR) between 0.25 and 1 and 174 patients in the solid group with a CTR of 1. Lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed using Cox regression models for both univariate and multivariate analyses to identify prognostic factors. Stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was employed for adjusting confounding factors. Recurrence incidence was assessed using competing risk analysis and compared using Gray's test. Results: In the multivariate analysis, female, peripheral location, and subsolid nodules were favorable prognostic factors for LCSS; peripheral location, subsolid nodules, and adjuvant therapy were favorable prognostic factors for PFS. Between the subsolid (n = 65) and solid groups (n = 174), the median LCSS were not reached (p = 0.003), with 3-, 5-, and 9-year LCSS rates of 94.7% versus 80.3%, 90.9% versus 64.1%, 82.7% versus 53.5%, respectively. The median PFS were 72.5 months and 50.5 months (p = 0.030), with 3-, 5-, and 9-year PFS rates of 75.4% versus 61.2%, 56.6% versus 44.9%, 48.6% versus 23.3%, respectively. After stabilized IPTW (n = 240), the median LCSS were not reached (p = 0.024), with 3-, 5-, and 9-year LCSS rates of 94.0% versus 82.4%, 92.2% versus 67.7%, 85.3% versus 58.2%, respectively. The median PFS were 60.2 months and 50.5 months (p = 0.096), with 3-, 5-, and 9-year PFS rates of 73.8% versus 61.0%, 53.5% versus 46.2%, 46.8% versus 22.4%, respectively. The subsolid group had lower rates of locoregional recurrence (LRR) (10.4% vs. 25.9%, p = 0.035) and distant metastasis (DM) (17.1% vs. 37.9%, p = 0.064) compared to the solid group. Conclusions: The presence of GGO-component in the lesion is an independent prognostic factor for LCSS and PFS. Subsolid nodules treated with SBRT demonstrated better prognosis, with significantly lower rates of local-regional recurrence. We should highlight GGO-component as a practical indicator for risk stratification of SBRT patients to guide treatment decisions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: FGFR2 fusions or rearrangements occur in 13%–20% of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA). Pemigatinib, a representative FGFR inhibitor, is commonly used for targeted therapy in such patients. Additionally, brain metastasis (BM) is extremely rare in advanced iCCA, and there is currently no standard treatment strategy for advanced iCCA patients with BM. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) may exhibit synergistic antitumor effects, presenting a promising approach for advanced iCCA. Case presentation: The patient, a 58-year-old male, experienced a recurrence of iCCA following surgery and chemotherapy, with multiple metastases in the liver, lungs, and brain. Genetic testing revealed FGFR2-TXLNG-fusion, and the patient was treated with pemigatinib in combination with tislelizumab and SBRT for the BM, resulting in significant tumor shrinkage. Adverse events (AEs) such as liver dysfunction, nail loss, and dry mouth were observed during treatment, which were considered to be related to pemigatinib. These AEs were significantly alleviated after dose reduction and symptomatic treatment. Conclusion: This case presented a rare occurrence of FGFR2 fusion-positive iCCA with BM, with extremely limited data on treatment options and survival outcomes in such patients. Our study was the first to report the application of the treatment strategy combining pemigatinib with ICI and SBRT in this specific case. The combined therapy proved effective and well-tolerated, providing new insights for future treatment considerations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ventricular arrhythmias (VA) can be life‐threatening arrhythmias that result in significant morbidity and mortality. Catheter ablation (CA) is an invasive treatment modality that can be effective in the treatment of VA where medications fail. Recurrence occurs commonly following CA due to an inability to deliver lesions of adequate depth to cauterise the electrical circuits that drive VA or reach areas of scar responsible for VA. Stereotactic body radiotherapy is a non‐invasive treatment modality that allows volumetric delivery of energy to treat circuits that cannot be reached by CA. It overcomes the weaknesses of CA and has been successfully utilised in small clinical trials to treat refractory VA. This article summarises the current evidence for this novel treatment modality and the steps that will be required to bring it to the forefront of VA treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in treating non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) exhibits a remarkable therapeutic efficacy. However, its effectiveness in overcoming resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) in patients with advanced EGFR mutations (EGFRm) NSCLC remains uncertain. Objective: We aimed to analyze the effect of SBRT on patients with first-line EGFR-TKIs. Design and methods: Eligible patients with advanced NSCLC initially diagnosed with EGFRm were enrolled. Patients in the EGFR-TKIs group received only the first-generation EGFR-TKIs until disease progression or death, while the others in the EGFR-TKIs + SBRT group received EGFR-TKIs and early SBRT (dose of 40–60 Gy/5–8 F) targeting the primary lung tumor at 1 month after EGFR-TKIs. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints were treatment-related adverse effects, overall survival (OS), and sites of initial failure. Results: A total of 184 advanced NSCLC patients with EGFRm were enrolled, including 39 patients in the EGFR-TKIs + SBRT group and 145 patients in the EGFR-TKIs group. The median PFS was 15.50 months in the EGFR-TKIs + SBRT group compared to 9.33 months in the EGFR-TKIs group (p = 0.0020). However, the median OS was 29.10 months in the EGFR-TKIs + SBRT group and 26.33 months in the EGFR-TKIs group, with no significant difference observed (p = 0.22). SBRT is an independent positive prognostic factor for PFS in advanced EGFRm NSCLC. EGFR exon 19 deletion mutation (16.33 vs 11.55 months, p = 0.0087) and fewer metastases (0–5) (31.94 vs 9.59 months, p = 0.0059) were associated with improved PFS in EGFR-TKIs + SBRT versus EGFR-TKIs. Combination therapy increased radiation pneumonitis mainly in Grades 1–2 (89.74% vs 0.0%). The EGFR-TKIs + SBRT group mainly had new site failure (57.10% vs 32.10%) rather than the original site failure. Conclusion: Early SBRT for primary lung tumors may overcome targeted resistance in advanced EGFRm NSCLC patients combined with EGFR-TKIs without serious toxicities, especially for EGFR exon 19-del. Trial registration: ChiCTR-OIN-17013920. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Surgical metastasectomy has been the primary choice for local therapy in patients with lung metastasis secondary to sarcoma. Over recent decades, however, stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has been employed more extensively in the treatment of lung metastasis. SBRT is associated with less toxicity and similar outcomes compared with surgical metastasectomy. When used with chemotherapy and surgery in a multimodal treatment plan, SBRT can improve the cure rate and prolong survival. Background: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is increasingly used to treat lung metastasis (LM) in patients with soft tissue sarcoma (STS) and bone sarcoma (BS). Methods: This retrospective study evaluated the outcomes of patients with BS and STS treated with SBRT for LM between 2010 and 2023. Results: We enrolled 102 patients (51 each with STS and BS), of whom 71 were males and 31 were females (median age, 40 years; range, 11–81 years). At diagnosis, 76 and 26 patients had localized and metastatic disease, respectively, with a median of 4 recurrences (range, 1–12). Before SBRT, 75 patients received chemotherapy and 52 underwent surgery for LM, with 276 nodules treated with SBRT (median dose, 48 Gy; range, 40–52). Local control of irradiated LM was 86% at 1 year and 78% at 2 years. By 31 December 2023 (median follow-up, 4.8 years), 60 patients had died and 42 survived (20 without ongoing disease). From the first LM relapse, the median overall survival (OS) was 4.8 years and the 5-year OS was 49% (95% confidence interval, 39–60%), with no difference between STS and BS; the median OS was 2.9 years and the 5-year OS was 36% after SBRT. Chemotherapy before SBRT was a negative prognostic factor by multivariate analysis. Conclusions: Long-term follow-up shows that SBRT as part of a multimodal treatment approach has reasonable survival rates in patients with LM due to sarcoma. Compared with historical results using only surgery and chemotherapy, SBRT has improved the 5-year OS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Stereotactic body radiation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma necessitates the implantation of gold fiducial markers in the liver, resulting in artifacts on computed tomography (CT) scans, which affect radiomic feature values. Purpose: This report aims to assess the effect of these artifacts on radiomic features and how removing CT slices affects radiomic features extracted from 3D regions of interest (ROI). Methods: First, the range variation in 38 tumor contours unaffected by artifacts was assessed after sequentially and randomly removing 25%, 50%, 75% of slices. Subsequently, the agreement of feature values before and after removing ROI slices containing artifacts from 186 patients' CT scans was assessed with Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) and a Wilcoxon signed‐rank test. Results: In artifact‐free tumor volumes, at least 71% of features remain robust with up to 50% of slices removed, while 56% remains robust with up to 75% of slices removed. When comparing contours before and after removing slices containing artifacts, around a third of features in the tumor contour and surrounding area remain robust (CCC > 0.9), compared to 44% in the healthy liver. Concerning the tumor, 13% (Gray Level Size Zone Matrix) to 61% (first order) of the features remain robust (CCC > 0.9). Over 90% of features differ significantly as assessed by Wilcoxon signed‐rank test, however. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that removing slices containing artifacts is a feasible solution for the CT fiducial problem in this patient population and provides insight into which features are affected. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) involves the delivery of high-dose, highly precise radiation therapy to focal sites of gross tumor involvement. Recent advances in radiation planning and image guidance have facilitated rapid growth in the evidence for and use of SBRT, particularly for genitourinary malignancies, where the underlying radiobiology often suggests greater tumor sensitivity to SBRT than to conventionally fractionated radiation. Here, we review the evolution of SBRT for patients with prostate adenocarcinoma and renal cell carcinoma. We discuss state-of-the-art trials, indications, and future directions in the SBRT-based management of both localized and metastatic disease. With rapidly growing enthusiasm and evidence, clinical and translational research efforts on the biology and outcomes of SBRT over the coming decade will be crucial to refining the indications, technical approach, and synergistic combinations of SBRT with highly active systemic therapies and improve the efficacy and quality-of-life outcomes for patients with genitourinary malignancies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), collectively termed SRS-SBRT, are advanced treatment modalities delivering high doses of radiation in a single treatment or condensed treatment phase. Due to the small margins and steep dose gradient used in SRS-SBRT, the technical and safety considerations are more stringent than traditional radiation therapy and may include more advanced simulation, patient immobilization, treatment planning, and treatment delivery techniques. Respiratory motion management and intrafraction motion monitoring are often used during SRS-SBRT to ensure treatments are robust to both internal organ motion and patient movement during treatment. To ensure optimal treatment quality, SRS-SBRT programs should use multidisciplinary coordination of care to ensure patient-specific treatment strategies are used for optimal patient outcomes. Quality and safety considerations are presented, including peer review and external validation, for optimizing quality and adhering to national guidelines for stereotactic techniques. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in elderly patients aged 65 or older with clinical stage I–II non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), specifically examining the differences between centrally located lung tumors and peripherally located lung tumors. Methods: From April 2009 to January 2020, a total of 136 patients with 136 tumors (65 central, 71 peripheral; NSCLC) at an early stage (T1-3N0M0) were treated with SBRT at a single institution. Central/peripheral location was assessed retrospectively on planning CT scans. A propensity score matching analysis was utilized to compare the two groups. In addition, the prognosis and related toxicity were compared between the two study arms. Results: A total of 33 central tumors and 33 peripheral tumors were matched and analyzed. The results showed no significant differences in overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) between the two groups. The 2-year OS was 71.88% (95% CI, 57.87%-89.27%) in the central lung cancer group, while it was 93.94% (95% CI, 86.14%-100.00%) in the peripheral lung cancer group (P=0.462). The 2-year PFS was 43.75% in the central lung cancer group, while it was 78.79% in the peripheral lung cancer group (P=0.279). Further subgroup analysis indicated that the location of peripheral tumor have a positive impact on OS in patients with adenocarcinoma. The occurrence of local failure, regional failure, or distant failure was comparable between central and peripheral tumors. There was no statistically significant difference in toxicity between the central and the peripheral tumor groups. Conclusion: The outcomes of SBRT for central tumors versus peripheral lung tumors in elderly patients with early-stage NSCLC were similar. SBRT demonstrated a similar level of safety in terms of toxicity for both central and peripheral lung tumors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aimin Zhang,3 Tao Zhang,3 Xiaofang Zhao,7 Xiaoyun Chang,3 Xuezhang Duan1– 31 307 Clinical College of PLA, ANHUI Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China; 2The Fifth Clinical College, ANHUI Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, People's Republic of China; 3Department of Radiation Oncology, Senior Department of Oncology, The Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China; 4Department of Oncology, Kaifeng People's Hospital, Kaifeng, Henan, People's Republic of China; 5Laboratory of Epigenetics at Institutes of Biomedical Sciences, and Intelligent Medicine Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China; 6Department of Radiation Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, Guangxi, People's Republic of China; 7Graduate School of PLA Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China *These authors contributed equally to this work Correspondence: Xuezhang Duan, 307 Clinical College of PLA, ANHUI Medical University, No. 8 East Street, Fengtai District, Beijing, People's Republic of China, Email [email protected] Purpose: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a micro-invasive treatment for early-stage HCC patients. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has also been proven an effective and safe treatment for HCC patients. This multi-center study is to compare the efficacy of computed tomography (CT)-guided RFA and CT-based SBRT in naïve HCC patients with tumor diameters ≤ 5 cm. Patients and Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 1001 treatment-naïve HCC patients from three hospitals or medical centers. The patients received RFA (n = 481) or SBRT (n = 520) treatment between December 2011 and May 2019. Furthermore, subgroup analyses of all patients were conducted based on Couinaud's classification of liver segments. Results: After matching, the local control (LC) rates of the SBRT group were better than those of the RFA group (p=0.024*), which mainly referred to the patients whose tumors were located in the S7/S8 (p=0.006*). Among patients with tumors located in S1, nineteen patients (19/21) underwent SBRT. The 1-, 3- and 5-year LC rates were 100%, 87.8% and 87.8% in the SBRT group, and the 1-, 3- and 5-year OS rates were 100%, 69.8% and 69.8%, respectively. Moreover, the OS rates in S5/S6 group in RFA were higher than those in SBRT group. Conclusion: The LC rates were better in the SBRT group than in the RFA group for the patients with lesions localized in S7/S8, and SBRT could also be a therapeutic option for patients with lesions in S1. Moreover, patients with tumors located in S5/S6 were better candidates for RFA treatment than SBRT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Risk-adapted stereotactic body radiation therapy is preferred over conventional radiotherapy at the authors' institution based on the hypothesis that even with a lower than recommended dose, stereotactic body radiation therapy would yield better local control than conventional radiotherapy. This retrospective study was performed to verify the hypothesis. Data from 34 patients with non-small cell lung cancer, who underwent risk-adapted stereotactic body radiation therapy delivered in 4 fractions between 2012 and 2018, were analyzed. The 3-year local control rate for patients receiving 42-44 Gy, 40 Gy, and 32-38 Gy was 80.8%, 75.0%, and 66.7%, respectively. The 3-year overall survival rate was 63.5%, 63.5%, and 40.0%, respectively. Three patients experienced grade 3 toxicities, with no toxicities > grade 3 observed. The results support the use of risk-adapted stereotactic body radiation therapy, both with a relatively high dose and a low dose. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To investigate the treatment outcomes of extracranial oligometastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Materials and methods: The clinical data of 388 extra-cranial oligometastatic CRC (≤ 5 lesions) patients and 463 lesions treated with SBRT at 19 cancer institutions were retrospectively analyzed. The prognostic factors predicting overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and local control (LC) were assessed in uni- and multivariable analyses. Results: The median age was 62 years (range, 29–92 years). The majority of the patients (90.5%) received surgery and systemic treatment for their primary tumor, had ≤ 2 metastasis (83.3%), had single organ involvement (90.3%), and staged using flouro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET/CT) (76%). The median fraction and total radiation doses were 10 Gy (range: 6–34 Gy) and 50 Gy (range: 8–64 Gy), respectively, delivered in a median of 4 fractions (range: 1–8). The median follow-up time for the entire cohort was 30.7 months (interquartile range: 27.0–34.3 months). The 3‑year OS, PFS, and LC rates were 64.0%, 42.3%, and 72.7%, respectively. The 3‑year LC rate was significantly higher in patients receiving BED10 ≥ 100 Gy than those receiving BED10 < 100 Gy (76.0% vs. 67.3%; p = 0.04). The 3‑year PFS and OS rates were higher in patients receiving BED10 ≥ 100 Gy than those receiving BED10 < 100 Gy (33.2% vs. 25.2%; p = 0.03; 53.7% vs. 44.8%; p = 0.02). Single metastasis and complete response after SBRT were independent prognostic factors for survival in multivariable analysis. Conclusions: In this multi-center study, we demonstrated that SBRT is an effective treatment option of metastatic lesions in oligometastatic CRC patients by providing promising LC rates. Higher SBRT doses beyond BED10 ≥ 100 Gy were associated with improved LC and survival. LC of treated lesion and lower tumor burden after SBRT were associated with better outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ObjectivesImmunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors has shown only limited success in the management of metastatic soft tissue sarcoma. Overall response rates (ORR) with single agent pembrolizumab were 18% and median PFS was 18 weeks on the clinical trial SARC028. One strategy to improve the responses to immunotherapy is with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), which can enhance the antitumor CD8 T cell response through the release of tumor-specific antigens, potentially priming a more diverse class of T cell receptors.MethodsThis is a phase 0, pilot prospective study taking place at a single center with 2 arms. In Arm A, patients are treated with pembrolizumab 400 mg IV infusion on day 1 of a 42-day cycle. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is delivered in 1-5 fractions starting on C1D15-28 and given every other day. In Arm B, patients who have started an immune checkpoint inhibitor within 60 days are treated with SBRT in addition to the current therapy.ResultsIn this study we outline testing the feasibility of adding SBRT to pembrolizumab.ConclusionThe ultimate goal of combination therapy is improved overall response, including tumors not treated with SBRT. This trial can be found registered online: NCT05488366.

Introduction: Lung cancer management in patients with pacemakers presents unique challenges. This report examines the utilization of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in such a patient population. Case Presentation: A 75-year-old former smoker with a dual-chamber pacemaker presented with inoperable lung adenocarcinoma. SBRT (48 Gy in 4 fractions) was chosen following multidisciplinary consultation and thorough pretreatment evaluation by a rhythmologist to assess pacemaker integrity. Continuous cardiac monitoring during SBRT detected no arrhythmias. Adjuvant therapy consisted of radiotherapy alone due to the patient’s health status and limited evidence supporting chemotherapy in this context. At the 18-month follow-up, no cancer recurrence was observed, and regular device checks confirmed pacemaker integrity. Conclusion: This case demonstrates the successful management of inoperable lung adenocarcinoma with SBRT in a patient with a pacemaker. It underscores the significance of interdisciplinary cooperation and careful patient assessment to optimize treatment outcomes in this challenging clinical scenario.

Abstract This study evaluates dosimetric differences in Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) for lung tumors using plans of Gamma Knife, and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT), Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) plans based on Linear Accelerator, aiming to inform the reader of appropriate treatment strategy selection. Ten patients with 23 lung tumor lesions treated with SBRT at Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University were analyzed. Plans of Gamma Knife, and VMAT, IMRT plans based on Linear Accelerator were created for each lesion, totaling 18 plans per type. Lesions were treated with 30–50 Gy in 5–10 fractions. Dosimetric parameters, including gradient index (GI), heterogeneity index (HI), conformity index (CI), and doses to the plan target volumes (PTVs), the gross tumor volumes (GTVs) and organs at risk (OARs) were compared. Plans of Gamma Knife showed superior HI and GI, higher PTV and GTV doses, and reduced doses to the ipsilateral and contralateral lungs, esophagus, spinal cord, and heart compared to VMAT and IMRT plans (p

Abstract Background Local therapies may benefit patients with oligometastatic cancer. However, there were limited data about pancreatic cancer. Here, we compared the efficacy and safety of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to the primary tumor and all oligometastases with SBRT to the primary tumor alone in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. Methods A retrospective review of patients with synchronous oligometastatic pancreatic cancer (up to 5 lesions) receiving SBRT to all lesions (including all oligometastases and the primary tumor) were performed. Another comparable group of patients with similar baseline characteristics, including metastatic burden, SBRT doses, and chemotherapy regimens, receiving SBRT to the primary tumor alone were identified. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints were progression frees survival (PFS), polyprogression free survival (PPFS) and adverse events. Results There were 59 and 158 patients receiving SBRT to all lesions and to the primary tumor alone. The median OS of patients with SBRT to all lesions and the primary tumor alone was 10.9 months (95% CI 10.2–11.6 months) and 9.3 months (95% CI 8.8–9.8 months) (P

Abstract Normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models for radiation pneumonitis (RP) in lung cancer patients with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), which based on dosimetric data from treatment planning, are limited to patients who have already received radiation therapy (RT). This study aims to identify a novel predictive factor for lung dose distribution and RP probability before devising actionable SBRT plans for lung cancer patients. A comprehensive correlation analysis was performed on the clinical and dose parameters of lung cancer patients who underwent SBRT. Linear regression models were utilized to analyze the dosimetric data of lungs. The performance of the regression models was evaluated using mean squared error (MSE) and the coefficient of determination (R 2). Correlational analysis revealed that most clinical data exhibited weak correlations with dosimetric data. However, nearly all dosimetric variables showed "strong" or "very strong" correlations with each other, particularly concerning the mean dose of the ipsilateral lung (MI) and the other dosimetric parameters. Further study verified that the lung tumor ratio (LTR) was a significant predictor for MI, which could predict the incidence of RP. As a result, LTR can predict the probability of RP without the need to design an elaborate treatment plan. This study, as the first to offer a comprehensive correlation analysis of dose parameters, explored the specific relationships among them. Significantly, it identified LTR as a novel predictor for both dose parameters and the incidence of RP, without the need to design an elaborate treatment plan.

Abstract Breast conserving treatment typically involves surgical excision of tumor and adjuvant radiotherapy targeting the breast area or tumor bed. Accurately defining the tumor bed is challenging and lead to irradiation of greater volume of healthy tissues. Preoperative stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) which target tumor may solves that issues. We conducted a systematic literature review to evaluates the early toxicity and cosmetic outcomes of this promising treatment approach. Secondary we reviewed pathological complete response (pCR) rates, late toxicity, patient selection criteria and radiotherapy protocols. We retrieved literature from PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane, ScienceDirect, and ClinicalTrials.gov. The study adhered to the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Ten prospective clinical trials (7 phase II, 3 phase I), encompassing 188 patients (aged 18–75 years, cT1-T3 cN0-N3 cM0, primarily with ER/PgR-positive, HER2-negative status,), were analyzed. Median follow-up was 15 months (range 3–30). Treatment involved single-fraction SBRT (15-21Gy) in five studies and fractionated (19.5–31.5Gy in 3 fractions) in the rest. Time interval from SBRT to surgery was 9.5 weeks (range 1–28). Acute and late G2 toxicity occurred in 0–17% and 0–19% of patients, respectively, G3 toxicity was rarely observed. The cosmetic outcome was excellent in 85–100%, fair in 0–10% and poor in only 1 patient. pCR varied, showing higher rates (up to 42%) with longer intervals between SBRT and surgery and when combined with neoadjuvant systemic therapy (up to 90%). Preoperative SBRT significantly reduce overall treatment time, enabling to minimalize volumes. Early results indicate excellent cosmetic effects and low toxicity. Graphical abstract

Introduction Methods Results Conclusion We investigated the clinical outcomes of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) alone versus SBRT after incomplete transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for a single recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) smaller than 5 cm.We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent SBRT for a single recurrent HCC ≤5 cm, without vascular invasion or extrahepatic metastasis. Patients were divided into the SBRT‐alone group and the TACE‐SBRT group. The primary outcome was the local control (LC) rate, and secondary outcomes were survivals and treatment‐related toxicities. We additionally conducted a propensity score matching (PSM) analysis.A total of 477 patients were available for analysis. Among them, 54 patients received SBRT without prior treatment to the target lesion (SBRT‐alone group), whereas 423 patients received SBRT for viable HCC after TACE (TACE‐SBRT group). The 3‐year LC rates did not differ between the two groups (SBRT‐alone group, 88.6% vs. TACE‐SBRT group, 89.6%, P = 0.918). The 3‐year rates of overall survival, out‐of‐field intrahepatic recurrence‐free survival and recurrence‐free survival were also not significantly different (P = 0.479, 0.290 and 0.273, respectively). Even after PSM, LC and survival rates at 3 years were not significantly different.SBRT alone demonstrated comparable local control and survival outcomes to SBRT following incomplete TACE. SBRT alone may be considered an alternative treatment option for a single recurrent HCC smaller than 5 cm when curative treatments or TACE are not feasible. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Lung cancer management in patients with pacemakers presents unique challenges. This report examines the utilization of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in such a patient population. Case Presentation: A 75-year-old former smoker with a dual-chamber pacemaker presented with inoperable lung adenocarcinoma. SBRT (48 Gy in 4 fractions) was chosen following multidisciplinary consultation and thorough pretreatment evaluation by a rhythmologist to assess pacemaker integrity. Continuous cardiac monitoring during SBRT detected no arrhythmias. Adjuvant therapy consisted of radiotherapy alone due to the patient’s health status and limited evidence supporting chemotherapy in this context. At the 18-month follow-up, no cancer recurrence was observed, and regular device checks confirmed pacemaker integrity. Conclusion: This case demonstrates the successful management of inoperable lung adenocarcinoma with SBRT in a patient with a pacemaker. It underscores the significance of interdisciplinary cooperation and careful patient assessment to optimize treatment outcomes in this challenging clinical scenario. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Heterogeneous Black populations encounter significant obstacles in accessing cancer care, yet research on lung cancer treatment disparities remains limited. This study investigates whether the disparity in receiving curative‐intent treatment (curative‐intent surgery and/or stereotactic body radiation therapy [SBRT]) for early‐stage non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) between non‐Hispanic Whites (NHWs) and total Blacks extends to diverse Black populations, including US‐born, Afro‐Haitian, West Indian Black, and Hispanic Black individuals. Methods: This cross‐sectional study included all Florida cancer registry early‐stage NSCLC cases 2005–2017, linked to individual‐level discharge data containing comorbidity and specific treatment details (surgery and/or SBRT). Multivariable logistic regression assessed the association between race/ethnicity and the receipt of curative‐intent treatment, while accounting for sociodemographic factors (poverty, age, insurance, and smoking status) and clinical variables. Results: Among 55,655 early‐stage NSCLC patients, 71.1% received curative‐intent treatment: 72.1% NHW and 59.7% Black (non‐Hispanic and Hispanic) individuals. Black patients had 35% lower odds (ORadj, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.59–0.70) of receiving curative‐intent treatment compared to NHW patients. ORs varied from 0.57 (95% CI, 0.59–0.70) for Hispanic Black to 0.76 (95% CI, 0.56–1.02) for West Indian Black. Remarkably, Black‐White disparities persisted despite the availability of curative treatment options (SBRT) for both high Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) observed among US‐born Blacks and surgery for low CCI patients among all other Black subgroups. Conclusions: Pronounced disparities in accessing curative‐intent treatments for early‐stage NSCLC were evident across all Black subgroups, regardless of treatment availability and comorbidity profile. These findings underscore the need to address Black heterogeneity and prompt further research to rectify treatment disparities in early‐stage NSCLC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Ultrahigh-dose-rate therapy, known as FLASH radiotherapy (RT), is an emerging cancer treatment technique that offers similar tumor control to conventional RT but with the enhanced protection of normal tissue through the FLASH-sparing effect. Preclinical studies on animals and cell lines show promising results. This is significant for patients with recurrent tumors and reirradiation cases, where conventional RT has high toxicity rates. FLASH-RT can potentially improve tumor control while reducing side effects and preserving quality of life. Among the FLASH modalities, proton therapy stands out for its superior dosimetric and delivery characteristics, making it a safe and effective option for human malignancies. Despite its potential, proton Bragg peak FLASH for HN cancer remains underexplored, and this review highlights the novel proton conformal FLASH techniques, which allow for high-quality plans while minimizing radiation exposure to critical organs at risk (OARs) for HN cancer reirradiation. Ultrahigh-dose-rate therapy, also known as FLASH radiotherapy (RT), is an emerging technique that is garnering significant interest in cancer treatment due to its potential to revolutionize therapy. This method can achieve comparable tumor control to conventional-dose-rate RT while offering the enhanced protection of normal tissue through the FLASH-sparing effect. This innovative technique has demonstrated promising results in preclinical studies involving animals and cell lines. Particularly noteworthy is its potential application in treating head and neck (HN) cancers, especially in patients with challenging recurrent tumors and reirradiation cases, where the toxicity rates with conventional radiotherapy are high. Such applications aim to enhance tumor control while minimizing side effects and preserving patients' quality of life. In comparison to electron or photon FLASH modalities, proton therapy has demonstrated superior dosimetric and delivery characteristics and is a safe and effective FLASH treatment for human malignancies. Compared to the transmission proton FLASH, single-energy Bragg peak FLASH is a novel delivery method that allows highly conformal doses to targets and minimal radiation doses to crucial OARs. Proton Bragg peak FLASH for HN cancer has still not been well studied. This review highlights the significance of proton FLASH in enhancing cancer therapy by examining the advantages and challenges of using it for HN cancer reirradiation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Chinese Medical Equipment Journal is the property of Chinese Medical Equipment Journal Editorial Office and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Simple Summary: Stereotactic ablative radiation (SAbR) is a focused, high-dose radiation technique used to treat cancers that have spread to the adrenal glands. One of the feared consequences of this therapy is causing adrenal insufficiency in patients, which is a lack of adrenal function; however, the rates and severity at which this occurs in patients are still poorly studied. We studied patients with 66 treated adrenal glands using SAbR, which demonstrated that this technique was effective at controlling cancer sites with a control rate of 75% at 1 year. The risk of patients developing adrenal insufficiency in the entire cohort was significant at 14%, with a median time of 4.3 months. There was a higher risk in patients who had both adrenal glands treated with SAbR, or who had received a prior surgical removal of their other adrenal gland prior to SAbR therapy, with 44% of these patients developing adrenal insufficiency. Background: Adrenal metastases are often treated with stereotactic ablative radiation (SAbR). We aimed to assess the incidence, timing, and factors associated with the development of primary adrenal insufficiency (PAI) following SAbR. Methods: A retrospective cohort study comprised 66 consecutive patients (73% men, median age 61 years) who underwent SAbR for adrenal metastasis. Results: The series encompassed metastases from renal cell carcinoma (41%), lung tumors (38%), colorectal adenocarcinoma (9%), melanoma (5%), and others (7%). Median follow-up was 17 months from SAbR. Nine (14%) patients developed PAI at a median of 4.3 months (range, 0.7–20.2). The incidence of PAI was 44% in patients with prior adrenalectomy receiving unilateral SAbR, 44% with bilateral SAbR, 2% with unaffected contralateral gland, and 0% with bilateral metastases treated with unilateral SAbR. PAI was associated with prior adrenalectomy (odds ratio [OR] 32) and bilateral SAbR (OR 8.2), but not age, sex, metastasis size, or biological effective dose. Post-SAbR 6-month and 1-year local control rates were 82% and 75%, respectively. Conclusions: Patients undergoing SAbR for adrenal metastasis are at high risk of developing PAI. PAI is associated with bilateral SAbR and contralateral adrenalectomy. PAI is unlikely with a remaining unaffected adrenal gland or in the setting of bilateral adrenal metastases with unilateral SAbR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: This study aimed to identify factors associated with local recurrence after spinal stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), focusing on patient movement during treatment and tumor characteristics. Methods: A total of 48 patients who underwent spinal SBRT alone without surgery from August 2017 to October 2022 were evaluated. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify factors associated with local recurrence, including patient movement and tumor characteristics such as soft tissue involvement and tumor volume. Patient movement during treatment was measured using cone beam computed tomography before and after irradiation. Results: Among the included cases, 68.7% and 42.6% had soft tissue involvement and movement exceeding 1 mm, respectively. The median follow-up duration for local recurrence was 11.6 (range: 0.7–44.9) months, whereas the median duration to local recurrence was 6.3 months. Within 12 months, 29.3% of the patients experienced local recurrence, among whom 43.9% moved ≥ 1 mm during treatment, whereas 15.8% did not move. Univariable analysis found that both soft tissue involvement (OR = 10.3, 1.21–87.9; p = 0.033) and patient movement ≥ 1 mm (OR = 5.75, 1.45–22.8; p = 0.013) were associated with local recurrence. Multivariable analysis identified patient movement as an independent prognostic factor for local recurrence (OR = 5.15, 1.06–25.0; p = 0.042). Conclusion: Our results suggest that patient movement during spinal SBRT was associated with local recurrence, emphasizing the need for better immobilization techniques and shorter delivery times to improve tumor control. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The primary treatment for stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in medically inoperable patients is stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). The current study aimed to retrospectively analyze patients who underwent SBRT. Methods: A total of 188 patients with stage I NSCLC treated with SBRT between 2014 and 2020 were enrolled. Local control (LC), progressionfree survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and treatment-related toxicities were analyzed. Results: Patients were mostly male (65.7%, n=71), with a median age of 68 (56-88). Based on tumor size and location, 69 patients (63.9%) received between 50 and 60 Gy in 5 fractions, 26 patients (24.1%) received 54 Gy in 3 fractions, 11 patients (10.2%) received 60 Gy in 8 fractions, and 2 patients (1.8%) received 60 Gy in 3 fractions. The median follow-up time was 32 months (12-47 months). Locoregional relapse occurred in 11 patients, among whom 4 (3.7%) developed distant metastasis. The 3-year LC, OS, and PFS rates were 89.5%, 83%, and 72%, respectively. Advanced age and presence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were associated with a decreased 3-year OS. In smokers and those with large tumor volumes, PFS decreased to 3 years. No grade 3 or 4 treatment-related toxicities were observed. Conclusion: SBRT is a fast, safe, and valuable therapeutic approach for patients with early-stage medically inoperable NSCLC, providing significant tumor control rates with low toxicity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To identify risk factors for the long‐term persistent genitourinary toxicity (GUT) after stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for localized prostate cancer (PCa). Methods: A total of 306 patients who underwent SBRT at our institution between March 2017 and April 2022 were retrospectively evaluated. SBRT was performed at 35 Gy in five fractions over 5 or 10 days. Factors related to the long‐term persistence of acute GUT after SBRT were analyzed. Results: During the median follow‐up period of 39.1 months, 203 (66%) patients experienced any grade of acute GUT, which remained in 78 (26%) patients 6 months after SBRT. Multivariate analysis revealed that age ≥75 years was consistently a significant independent risk factor for any grade of acute GUT 6, 12, and 24 months after SBRT (hazard ratio [HR] 2.31, p = 0.010; HR 2.84, p = 0001; and HR 3.05, p = 0.009, respectively). Older age was not a significant risk factor for the development of grade ≥2 acute GUT. The duration of acute GUT was significantly longer in the older group than in the nonolder group (median duration = 234 vs. 61 days, p < 0.001), and the incidence of persistent GUT was significantly more frequent in the older group beyond 6 months after SBRT. Conclusions: Older age is a significant independent risk factor for the long‐term persistent GUT after SBRT for localized PCa. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Radiotherapy (RT) synergizes with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB). CD1c(BDCA-1)+/CD141(BDCA-3)+ myeloid dendritic cells (myDC) in the tumor microenvironment are indispensable at initiating effector T-cell responses and response to ICB. Methods: In this phase II clinical trial, anti-PD-1 ICB pretreated oligometastatic patients (tumor agnostic) underwent a leukapheresis followed by isolation of CD1c(BDCA-1)+/CD141(BDCA-3)+ myDC. Following hypofractionated stereotactic body RT (3 × 8 Gy), patients were randomized (3:1). Respectively, in arm A (immediate treatment), intratumoral (IT) ipilimumab (10 mg) and avelumab (40 mg) combined with intravenous (IV) pembrolizumab (200 mg) were administered followed by IT injection of myDC; subsequently, IV pembrolizumab and IT ipilimumab/avelumab were continued (q3W). In arm B (contemporary control arm), patients received IV pembrolizumab, with possibility to cross-over at progression. Primary endpoint was 1-year progression-free survival rate (PFS). Secondary endpoints were safety, feasibility, objective response rate, PFS, and overall survival (OS). Results: Thirteen patients (10 in arm A, eight non-small cell lung cancer, and five melanoma) were enrolled. Two patients crossed over. One-year PFS rate was 10% in arm A and 0% in arm B. Two patients in arm A obtained a partial response, and one patient obtained a stable disease as best response. In arm B, one patient obtained a SD. Median PFS and OS were 21.8 weeks (arm A) versus 24.9 (arm B), and 62.7 versus 57.9 weeks, respectively. An iatrogenic pneumothorax was the only grade 3 treatment-related adverse event. Conclusion: SBRT and pembrolizumab with or without IT avelumab/ipilimumab and IT myDC in oligometastatic patients are safe and feasible with a clinically meaningful tumor response rate. However, the study failed to reach its primary endpoint. Trial registration number: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04571632 (09 AUG 2020). EUDRACT: 2019-003668-32. Date of registration: 17 DEC 2019, amendment 1: 6 MAR 2021, amendment 2: 4 FEB 2022. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: This case study discusses a 37-year-old man who presented with stage IV (cT3N1M1a) sigmoid colon cancer that had metastasized to the liver. The patient underwent stereotactic body radiation therapy using real-time, fiducial-based, triggered-imaging guidance and amplitude-based respiratory gating at exhalation. In addition to the cancer diagnosis, the patient was deaf and had a substantial medical and surgical history for other comorbidities. Discussion: Although deaf patients account for a small percentage of those undergoing radiation therapy, this treatment has the potential to be more inclusive to this group, which the authors accomplished using a novel approach. Providing instructions to enable the patient to breathe in a consistent, periodic, and reproducible manner via sign-language interpretation and visual setup was key to providing equitable care. Conclusion: The multidisciplinary team must work to ensure that deaf patients are not excluded from gating treatment protocols typically achieved through verbal coaching. With appropriate visual setup, sign-language interpretation, and coaching through translation, culturally competent care can be provided successfully and seamlessly. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Spine stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for the treatment of metastatic disease is increasingly utilized owing to improved pain and local control over conventional regimens. Vertebral body collapse (VBC) is an important toxicity following spine SBRT. We investigated our institutional experience with spine SBRT as it relates to VBC and spinal instability neoplastic score (SINS). Records of 83 patients with 100 spinal lesions treated with SBRT between 2007 and 2022 were reviewed. Clinical information was abstracted from the medical record. The primary endpoint was post-treatment VBC. Logistic univariate analysis was performed to identify clinical factors associated with VBC. Median dose and number of fractions used was 24 Gy and 3 fractions, respectively. There were 10 spine segments that developed VBC (10%) after spine SBRT. Median time to VBC was 2.4 months. Of the 11 spine segments that underwent kyphoplasty prior to SBRT, none developed subsequent VBC. No factors were associated with VBC on univariate analysis. The rate of vertebral body collapse following spine SBRT is low. Prophylactic kyphoplasty may provide protection against VBC and should be considered for patients at high risk for fracture. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Local therapies may benefit patients with oligometastatic cancer. However, there were limited data about pancreatic cancer. Here, we compared the efficacy and safety of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to the primary tumor and all oligometastases with SBRT to the primary tumor alone in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. Methods: A retrospective review of patients with synchronous oligometastatic pancreatic cancer (up to 5 lesions) receiving SBRT to all lesions (including all oligometastases and the primary tumor) were performed. Another comparable group of patients with similar baseline characteristics, including metastatic burden, SBRT doses, and chemotherapy regimens, receiving SBRT to the primary tumor alone were identified. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints were progression frees survival (PFS), polyprogression free survival (PPFS) and adverse events. Results: There were 59 and 158 patients receiving SBRT to all lesions and to the primary tumor alone. The median OS of patients with SBRT to all lesions and the primary tumor alone was 10.9 months (95% CI 10.2–11.6 months) and 9.3 months (95% CI 8.8–9.8 months) (P < 0.001). The median PFS of two groups was 6.5 months (95% CI 5.6–7.4 months) and 4.1 months (95% CI 3.8–4.4 months) (P < 0.001). The median PPFS of two groups was 9.8 months (95% CI 8.9–10.7 months) and 7.8 months (95% CI 7.2–8.4 months) (P < 0.001). Additionally, 14 (23.7%) and 32 (20.2%) patients in two groups had grade 3 or 4 treatment-related toxicity. Conclusions: SBRT to all oligometastases and the primary tumor in patients with pancreatic cancer may improve survival, which needs prospective verification. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models for radiation pneumonitis (RP) in lung cancer patients with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), which based on dosimetric data from treatment planning, are limited to patients who have already received radiation therapy (RT). This study aims to identify a novel predictive factor for lung dose distribution and RP probability before devising actionable SBRT plans for lung cancer patients. A comprehensive correlation analysis was performed on the clinical and dose parameters of lung cancer patients who underwent SBRT. Linear regression models were utilized to analyze the dosimetric data of lungs. The performance of the regression models was evaluated using mean squared error (MSE) and the coefficient of determination (R2). Correlational analysis revealed that most clinical data exhibited weak correlations with dosimetric data. However, nearly all dosimetric variables showed "strong" or "very strong" correlations with each other, particularly concerning the mean dose of the ipsilateral lung (MI) and the other dosimetric parameters. Further study verified that the lung tumor ratio (LTR) was a significant predictor for MI, which could predict the incidence of RP. As a result, LTR can predict the probability of RP without the need to design an elaborate treatment plan. This study, as the first to offer a comprehensive correlation analysis of dose parameters, explored the specific relationships among them. Significantly, it identified LTR as a novel predictor for both dose parameters and the incidence of RP, without the need to design an elaborate treatment plan. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths globally, with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounting for over 85% of cases and poor prognosis in advanced stages. This study explored shifts in circulating metabolite levels in NSCLC patients versus healthy controls and examined the effects of conventionally fractionated radiation therapy (CFRT) and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). We enrolled 91 NSCLC patients (38 CFRT and 53 SBRT) and 40 healthy controls. Plasma metabolite levels were assessed using semi-targeted metabolomics, revealing 32 elevated and 18 reduced metabolites in patients. Key discriminatory metabolites included ethylmalonic acid, maltose, 3-phosphoglyceric acid, taurine, glutamic acid, glycocolic acid, and d-arabinose, with a combined Receiver Operating Characteristics curve indicating perfect discrimination between patients and controls. CFRT and SBRT affected different metabolites, but both changes suggested a partial normalization of energy and amino acid metabolism pathways. In conclusion, metabolomics identified distinct metabolic signatures in NSCLC patients with potential as diagnostic biomarkers. The differing metabolic responses to CFRT and SBRT reflect their unique therapeutic impacts, underscoring the utility of this technique in enhancing NSCLC diagnosis and treatment monitoring. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Oncologic back pain, infection, inflammation, and trauma are the only specific etiologies of chronic low back pain (CLBP) in contrast to most patients who have non-specific CLBP. In oncologic patients developing CLBP, it is critically important to perform further investigation to exclude spinal metastases (SM).The incidence of cancer is increasing, with 15.7–30% developing SM. In the case of symptomatic SM, we can distinguish three main categories: tumor pain; mechanical pain due to instability, with or without pathologic fractures; and metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) or radicular compression. Treatment of SM-related pain is dependent on these categories and consists of symptomatic treatment, target therapy to the bone, radiotherapy, systemic oncologic treatment, and surgery. The care for SM is a multidisciplinary concern, with rapid evolutions in all specialties involved. It is of primordial importance to incorporate the knowledge of specialists in all participating disciplines, such as oncology, radiotherapy, and spinal surgery, to determine the adequate treatment to preserve ambulatory function and quality of life while limiting the burden of treatment if possible. Awareness of potential SM is the first and most important step in the treatment of SM-related pain. Early diagnosis and timely treatment could prevent further deterioration. In this review, we explore the pathophysiology and symptomatology of SM and the treatment options for SM-related pain: tumor pain; mechanical pain due to instability, with or without pathologic fractures; and MESCC or radicular compression. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aim: This study aimed to investigate the association between liver volume change and hepatic decompensation and compare the risk of hepatic decompensation in patients with liver cirrhosis (LC) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who underwent stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Methods: A retrospective review of SBRT‐treated HCC and compensated LC without HCC patients was conducted. Liver volume was measured using auto‐segmentation software on liver dynamic computed tomography scans. The decompensation event was defined as the first occurrence of refractory ascites, esophageal variceal bleeding, hepatic encephalopathy, or spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. We evaluated the association between the rate of liver volume decrease and hepatic decompensation and compared decompensation events between the SBRT and LC cohorts using propensity score matching. Results: A total of 138 patients from the SBRT cohort and 488 from the LC cohort were analyzed. The rate of liver volume decrease was associated with the risk of decompensation events in both cohorts. The 3‐year rate of decompensation events was significantly higher in the group with a liver volume decreasing rate > 7%/year compared with the group with a rate < 7%/year. In the propensity score‐matched cohort, the 3‐year rate of decompensation events after a single session of SBRT was not significantly different from that in the LC cohort. Conclusions: The rate of liver volume decrease was significantly associated with the risk of hepatic decompensation in both HCC patients who received SBRT and LC patients. A single session of SBRT for HCC did not result in a higher decompensation rate compared with LC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: The adrenal glands represent a frequent localization area for metastases of various primary tumors. The standard of care for treating adrenal metastases is currently surgical resection, but radiotherapy is becoming a feasible and well-tolerated treatment alternative. However, the literature shows contradictory results regarding the optimal local treatment for adrenal metastases. This study analyzed oncological outcomes (local control, progression free survival, and overall survival) and complication rates after stereotactic body radiotherapy or surgical resection of adrenal metastases to further asses the benefits of stereotactic body radiotherapy. To our knowledge, this analysis is the first direct comparison of stereotactic body radiotherapy and adrenalectomy for adrenal metastases. Background: This single-center retrospective study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity profiles of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and surgical resection in patients with adrenal metastases originating from solid tumors. Methods/Materials: Patients with advanced tumor conditions or comorbidities typically received SBRT, whereas those considered physically fit underwent standard surgical treatment. Endpoints included local control (LC), progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and complication rates (CR). Results: 41 patients with 48 adrenal metastases were included, with 27 (65.9%) patients receiving SBRT and 14 (34.1%) patients undergoing adrenalectomy. One- and two-year LC values were 100% for both periods after adrenalectomy, and 70.0% and 52.5% after SBRT (p = 0.001). PFS showed values of 40.2% and 32.1% at one and two years after adrenalectomy and of 10.6% for both periods after SBRT (p = 0.223). OS was 83.3% both one and two years after surgery and 67.0% and 40.2% after SBRT (p = 0.031). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding acute complications (p = 0.123). Conclusion: Despite potential confounders, adrenalectomy exhibited statistically significant superior LC and OS compared to SBRT in managing adrenal metastases, while both treatment methods displayed acceptable toxicity profiles. However, patient selection bias must be taken into account when directly comparing the two therapy modalities. Nevertheless, the study provides new and important results for the scientific and medical communities regarding oncological outcomes after SBRT or surgical resection of adrenal metastases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Breast conserving treatment typically involves surgical excision of tumor and adjuvant radiotherapy targeting the breast area or tumor bed. Accurately defining the tumor bed is challenging and lead to irradiation of greater volume of healthy tissues. Preoperative stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) which target tumor may solves that issues. We conducted a systematic literature review to evaluates the early toxicity and cosmetic outcomes of this promising treatment approach. Secondary we reviewed pathological complete response (pCR) rates, late toxicity, patient selection criteria and radiotherapy protocols. We retrieved literature from PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane, ScienceDirect, and ClinicalTrials.gov. The study adhered to the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Ten prospective clinical trials (7 phase II, 3 phase I), encompassing 188 patients (aged 18–75 years, cT1-T3 cN0-N3 cM0, primarily with ER/PgR-positive, HER2-negative status,), were analyzed. Median follow-up was 15 months (range 3–30). Treatment involved single-fraction SBRT (15-21Gy) in five studies and fractionated (19.5–31.5Gy in 3 fractions) in the rest. Time interval from SBRT to surgery was 9.5 weeks (range 1–28). Acute and late G2 toxicity occurred in 0–17% and 0–19% of patients, respectively, G3 toxicity was rarely observed. The cosmetic outcome was excellent in 85–100%, fair in 0–10% and poor in only 1 patient. pCR varied, showing higher rates (up to 42%) with longer intervals between SBRT and surgery and when combined with neoadjuvant systemic therapy (up to 90%). Preoperative SBRT significantly reduce overall treatment time, enabling to minimalize volumes. Early results indicate excellent cosmetic effects and low toxicity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a therapeutic option in the guidelines for liver primaries after standard strategies like surgery or thermoablation have failed. To assess its efficacy and safety, we reviewed all patients treated by SBRT for a hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) over a six-year period. Methods and materials: The study included all patients treated by SBRT for HCC between April 2015 and November 2021 in the University Cancer Institute at Toulouse-Oncopole. All patients were inoperable and not eligible for thermoablation, or after a failure. All tumor sizes were included and cirrhosis up to Child-Pugh B was accepted. Local control (LC), overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Treatment response was assessed using mRECIST criteria. Toxicity was graded using CTCAE (v4.0). Results: One hundred and nine patients with 118 lesions were treated. Half underwent prior standard treatment. Median dose was 50 Grays in five fractions for most patients. Chronic liver disease represented 90.8 % of cases with a median age of 69 years. Median tumor size was 4.0 cm. Median follow-up was 22.2 months [95 %CI: 15.1–30.4]. LC, OS and PFS at two years were 82.4 % [95 %CI: 71.3; 89.5], 73.2 % [95 %CI: 61.5; 81.8] and 35.8 % [95 %CI: 25.1; 46.7], respectively. Acute toxicities occurred in 20.2 % of patients, including 10.1 % grade 3–4 and 1.8 % grade 5. Late toxicities occurred in 5.5 % of patients including 4.6 % grade 3–4. Grade ≥ 3 toxicity was related to digestive perforation or liver failure. Conclusion: SBRT provides good LC with an acceptable safety profile. It can be used in several settings such as salvage therapy or in combination with validated treatment. Prospective randomized trials are needed to validate SBRT as a standard alternative.

BackgroundFGFR2 fusions or rearrangements occur in 13%–20% of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA). Pemigatinib, a representative FGFR inhibitor, is commonly used for targeted therapy in such patients. Additionally, brain metastasis (BM) is extremely rare in advanced iCCA, and there is currently no standard treatment strategy for advanced iCCA patients with BM. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) may exhibit synergistic antitumor effects, presenting a promising approach for advanced iCCA.Case presentationThe patient, a 58-year-old male, experienced a recurrence of iCCA following surgery and chemotherapy, with multiple metastases in the liver, lungs, and brain. Genetic testing revealed FGFR2-TXLNG-fusion, and the patient was treated with pemigatinib in combination with tislelizumab and SBRT for the BM, resulting in significant tumor shrinkage. Adverse events (AEs) such as liver dysfunction, nail loss, and dry mouth were observed during treatment, which were considered to be related to pemigatinib. These AEs were significantly alleviated after dose reduction and symptomatic treatment.ConclusionThis case presented a rare occurrence of FGFR2 fusion-positive iCCA with BM, with extremely limited data on treatment options and survival outcomes in such patients. Our study was the first to report the application of the treatment strategy combining pemigatinib with ICI and SBRT in this specific case. The combined therapy proved effective and well-tolerated, providing new insights for future treatment considerations.

Pronounced T cell exhaustion characterizes immunosuppressive tumors, with the tumor microenvironment (TME) employing multiple mechanisms to elicit this suppression. Traditional immunotherapies, such as immune checkpoint blockade, often fail due to their focus primarily on T cells. To overcome this, we utilized a proinflammatory cytokine, interleukin (IL)-12, that re-wires the immunosuppressive TME by inducing T cell effector function while also repolarizing immunosuppressive myeloid cells. Due to toxicities observed with systemic administration of this cytokine, we utilized lipid nanoparticles encapsulating mRNA encoding IL-12 for intratumoral injection. This strategy has been proven safe and tolerable in early clinical trials for solid malignancies. We report an unprecedented loss of exhausted T cells and the emergence of an activated phenotype in murine pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and IL-12mRNA. Our mechanistic findings reveal that each treatment modality contributes to the T cell response differently, with SBRT expanding the T cell receptor repertoire and IL-12mRNA promoting robust T cell proliferation and effector status. This distinctive T cell signature mediated marked growth reductions and long-term survival in local and metastatic PDAC models. This is the first study of its kind combining SBRT with IL-12mRNA and provides a promising new approach for treating this aggressive malignancy.

Introduction: We compared the dosimetric characteristics of the target and organs at risk (OARs) as well as the preliminary clinical outcomes between two accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) techniques. Methods: Forty-four patients diagnosed with left-sided early breast cancer who underwent APBI using either interstitial brachytherapy (IB) or stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) with CyberKnife (CK) were retrospectively reviewed. The dosimetric parameters of the target and OARs were compared. Preliminary clinical outcomes, including tumor control and acute toxicity, were analyzed. Results: Treatment plans with CK demonstrated a better cardiac dose-sparing effect. Radiation doses to the heart at V150cGy for the CK and IB groups were 24.4 % and 60.4 %, respectively (p

PurposeTo identify any clinical or dosimetric parameters that predict which individuals may benefit from on-table adaptation during pancreas stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) with MRI-guided radiotherapy.Methods and materialsThis was a retrospective study of patients undergoing MRI-guided SBRT from 2016 to 2022. Pre-treatment clinical variables and dosimetric parameters on the patient's simulation scan were recorded for each SBRT course, and their ability to predict for on-table adaptation was analyzed using ordinal logistic regression. The outcome measure was number of fractions adapted.ResultsSixty-three SBRT courses consisting of 315 fractions were analyzed. Median prescription dose was 40 Gy in five fractions (range, 33-50 Gy); 52% and 48% of courses were prescribed ≤40 Gy and >40 Gy, respectively. The median minimum dose delivered to 95% (D95) of the gross tumor volume (GTV) and planning target volume (PTV) was 40.1 Gy and 37.0 Gy, respectively. Median number of fractions adapted per course was three, with 58% (183 out of 315) total fractions adapted. On univariable analysis, the prescription dose (>40 Gy vs ≤40 Gy), GTV volume, stomach V20 and V25, duodenum V20 and dose maximum, large bowel V33 and V35, GTV dose minimum, PTV dose minimum, and gradient index were significant determinants for adaptation (all p

Insulinoma is the most common functional neuroendocrine tumor of the pancreas, with the main clinical symptom being hypoglycemia. The standard treatment is surgery, but some patients are not eligible for surgery, while in those operated on, the risk of perioperative complications is up to 30%. Diazoxide treatment to prevent hypoglycemia is effective only in 50% of patients. To prevent tumor growth and hormonal excess, stereotactic radiotherapy may be an alternative to surgical treatment. In our paper, we present two cases of patients with insulinoma treated successfully with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT).

Shane S Neibart,1 Shalini Moningi,1 Krishan R Jethwa2 1Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; 2Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USACorrespondence: Shalini Moningi, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA, Tel +01 (781) 624-4700, Email Shalini_Moningi@dfci.harvard.eduIntroduction: For patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC), who are candidates for radiation therapy, dose-escalated radiation therapy (RT) offers unique benefits over traditional radiation techniques. In this review, we present a historical perspective of dose-escalated RT for LAPC. We also outline advances in SBRT delivery, one form of dose escalation and a framework for selecting patients for treatment with SBRT.Results: Techniques for delivering SBRT to patients with LAPC have evolved considerably, now allowing for dose-escalation and superior respiratory motion management. At the same time, advancements in systemic therapy, particularly the use of induction multiagent chemotherapy, have called into question which patients would benefit most from radiation therapy. Multidisciplinary assessment of patients with LAPC is critical to guide management and select patients for local therapy. Results from ongoing trials will establish if there is a role of dose-escalated SBRT after induction chemotherapy for carefully selected patients.Conclusion: Patients with LAPC have more therapeutic options than ever before. Careful selection for SBRT may enhance patient outcomes, pending the maturation of pivotal clinical trials.Keywords: pancreatic cancer, stereotactic body radiation therapy, locally advanced pancreatic cancer, ablative radiation therapy