Search

Reintervention is commonly required postsurgical mitral valve replacement (SMVR) or repair due to bioprosthetic valve and annuloplasty ring degeneration. However, redo SMVR is associated with a high risk of morbidity and mortality. Postsurgical transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) is a safe and less-invasive alternative that has repeatedly been shown to be associated with improved survival and lower rates of complications compared with redo SMVR. Comprehensive patient evaluation and thorough procedural planning are key to successful TMVR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: Transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) has become a feasible alternative to surgical mitral valve replacement (SMVR) in selected patients at high surgical risk. The risk of valve thrombosis following SMVR and TMVR, and the optimal antithrombotic therapy following these procedures, remains uncertain. We aimed to compare the incidence of bioprosthetic mitral valve thrombosis (bMVT) after SMVR and TMVR, and the incidence of bMVT between patients on different antithrombotic regimens., Methods and Results: A literature search of Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library was performed between January 2000 and August 2024. Random-effects models were used to derive pooled estimates of the incidence of bMVT in the absence of prior or active endocarditis and valve thrombosis. 47 studies (6170 patients, total follow-up 9541.8 patient-years) were eligible for inclusion. The overall incidence of bMVT was 5.05 (95%CI 3.18-8.01, I2 = 82%) per 100-patient-years. Subclinical bMVT was more common than clinically significant bMVT: incidence 19.11 vs 7.91 per 100-patient-years, adjusted incidence rate ratio (aIRR) 4.62 (95%CI 1.39-15.36), p = 0.012. bMVT was numerically more common after TMVR than SMVR, but the comparison was not statistically significant: incidence 7.03 vs 0.58 per 100-patient-years, aIRR 2.19 (95%CI 0.72-6.72), p = 0.170. Patients on vitamin-K antagonists (VKA) had a lower incidence of bMVT than patients on direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC; incidence 5.72 vs 17.08, aIRR 0.31, 95%CI 0.13-0.73, p = 0.007)., Conclusions: bMVT is not uncommon, with numerically higher incidence in transcatheter compared to surgical valves, but the comparison was not statistically significant. VKAs are associated with a lower incidence of bMVT compared to DOACs., (© The Author(s) 2025. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

BackgroundTranscatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) has emerged as an alternative to redo surgery. TMVR compared with redo surgical mitral valve replacement (SMVR) in patients with mitral prosthesis failure remains limited. In this study, we performed a meta-analysis to assess the outcomes of TMVR (including valve-in-valve and valve-in-ring) versus redo surgery for mitral prosthesis failure.MethodsWe comprehensively searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library databases according to predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria, and then we extracted data. We compared the outcomes of TMVR and redo SMVR for mitral prosthesis failure in terms of the in-hospital mortality, stroke, renal dysfunction, vascular complication, pacemaker implantation, exploration for bleeding, paravalvular leak, mean mitral valve gradient, 30-day mortality, and 1-year mortality.ResultsNine retrospective cohort studies and a total of 3,038 patients were included in this analysis. Compared with redo SMVR for mitral prosthesis failure, TMVR was associated with lower in-hospital mortality [odds ratios (OR): 0.44; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.30–0.64; P < 0.001], stroke (OR: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.29–0.67; P = 0.0001), renal dysfunction (OR: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.37–0.75; P = 0.0003), vascular complication (OR: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.43–0.78; P = 0.004), pacemaker implantation (OR: 0.23; 95% CI: 0.15–0.36; P < 0.00001), and exploration for bleeding (OR: 0.24; 95% CI: 0.06–0.96; P = 0.04). Conversely, redo SMVR had lower paravalvular leak (OR: 22.12; 95% CI: 2.81–174.16; P = 0.003). There was no difference in mean mitral valve gradient (MD: 0.04; 95% CI: −0.47 to 0.55; P = 0.87), 30-day mortality (OR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.36–1.17; P = 0.15), and 1-year mortality (OR: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.63–1.45; P = 0.84).ConclusionIn patients with mitral prosthesis failure, TMVR is associated with lower in-hospital mortality and lower occurrence of postoperative complications, except for paravalvular leak. TMVR offers a viable alternative to the conventional redo surgery in selected patients.

Objectives. To study the long-term outcomes of mitral valve replacement with mechanical or biological valve prostheses in native mitral valve infective endocarditis patients. Desing. We conducted a retrospective, nationwide, multicenter cohort study with patients aged ≤70 years who were treated with mitral valve replacement for native mitral valve infective endocarditis in Finland between 2004 and 2017. Results. The endpoints were all-cause mortality, ischemic stroke, major bleeding, and mitral valve reoperations. The results were adjusted for baseline features (age, gender, comorbidities, history of drug abuse, concomitant surgeries, operational urgency, and surgical center). The median follow-up time was 6.1 years. The 12-year cumulative mortality rates were 36% for mechanical prostheses and 74% for biological prostheses (adj. HR 0.40; CI: 0.17–0.91; p = 0.03). At follow-up, the ischemic stroke had occurred in 19% of patients with mechanical prosthesis and 33% of those with a biological prosthesis (adj. p = 0.52). The major bleeding rates within the 12-year follow-up period were 30% for mechanical prosthesis and 13% for a biological prosthesis (adj. p = 0.29). The mitral valve reoperation rates were 13% for mechanical prosthesis and 12% for a biological prosthesis (adj. p = 0.50). Drug abuse history did not have a significant modifying impact on the results (interaction p = 0.51 for mortality and ≥0.13 for secondary outcomes). Conclusion. The use of mechanical mitral valve prosthesis is associated with lower long-term mortality compared to the biological prosthesis in non-elder native mitral valve infective endocarditis patients. The routine choice of biological mitral valve prostheses for this patient group is not supported by the results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose of Review: Repeat surgery for failed mitral valve prostheses and repairs are fraught with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Therefore, clinicians have evolved transcatheter technology as an alternative therapy. This review serves as an update as the field has moved out of the early learning curve of treating postsurgical mitral valve failures. Recent Findings: Mitral valve-in-valve procedures have higher rates of technical success and better in-hospital and 1-year mortality rates than mitral valve-in-ring cases. The higher rates of complications, including left ventricular outflow tract obstruction, paravalvular leak, valve embolization, and need for a 2nd valve, may explain these outcomes. Summary: Mitral valve-in-ring procedures have attenuated outcomes as compared to valve-in-valve. Clinicians should be cognizant of the nuanced complexities and the potential for suboptimal outcomes in using balloon-expandable valves for mitral valve-in-ring procedures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background The main aims of this study were to examine the incidence and in-hospital outcomes of mechanical and bioprosthetic surgical mitral valve replacement (SMVR) among patients with and without T2DM. Methods We performed a retrospective study using the Spanish National Hospital Discharge Database from 2001 to 2015. We included patients with SMVR codified in their discharge report. We grouped admissions by diabetes status. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to compare outcomes of isolated SMVR. Results We identified 42,937 patients (16.41% with T2DM). Incidence rates of mechanical and bioprosthetic SMVR were higher among T2DM patients than among non-T2DM patients. In both groups of patients, the use of bioprosthetic SMVR increased over time. The use of mechanical valves remained stable among T2DM patients. In T2DM and non-T2DM patients with mechanical SMVR, in hospital mortality (IHM) and MACCE decreased significantly (p

Background: We investigated the long‐term outcomes of mitral valve replacement (MVR) in native mitral valve infective endocarditis (IE). Methods: Multicentre, population‐based cohort register study consisted of 1233 consecutive adult patients treated with first‐time MVR in Finland. Mitral valve IE was diagnosed in 170 of these patients. Propensity score matching resulted in 134 pairs with balanced baseline characteristics. The median follow‐up was 6.1 years. Results: Pre‐operative native mitral valve IE was associated with an increased hazard of 10‐year mortality (38.8% vs 30.5%; HR 2.13; CI 1.17‐3.85; P =.013) after MVR. Occurrence of major bleeding was higher in IE patients (26.0%) vs non‐IE patients (23.4%) during the 10‐year follow‐up (HR 2.80; CI 1.01‐7.77; P =.048). Hospital admission duration after MVR was longer in IE patients (median 28 vs 11 days; P <.0001). Cumulative ischaemic stroke rate was similar between patient groups (12.1% in IE vs 15.1% in non‐IE; P =.493). Re‐sternotomy was performed in 13.4% of IE patients and 9.0% of non‐IE patients (P =.261). Conclusions: Patients with native mitral valve IE have a higher risk of death and major bleeding after MVR than matched patients without IE. Results highlight the importance of complication prevention in these patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: A systematic approach to quantify mitral annular calcification (MAC) in all-comers by multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) is essential to guide treatment, but lacking.Methods: From September 2015 to July 2019, 82 patients with MAC underwent MDCT at two institutions to evaluate for surgical mitral valve replacement (SMVR), transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR), or medical management. Type 1 MAC was defined as <270° annular calcium and Type 2 as ≥270°. Absence/presence of predicted left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction with virtual valve placement was used to further define Type 2 MAC into 2A/B for our treatment algorithm.Results: Type 1 MAC was present in 51.2%, Type 2A in 18.3%, and Type 2B in 30.5%. Operable Type 1 patients (50.0%) underwent hybrid transatrial TMVR or SMVR. Type 2A underwent a variety of treatments, and Type 2B surgical candidates (40.0%) underwent hybrid transatrial TMVR secondary to difficult suture anchoring with significant MAC and predicted LVOT obstruction. At a follow-up of 29.6 ± 12.0 months, mortality was 42.7% with 46.3% in the intervention group and 39.0% in the medical group (p = 0.47). All percutaneous TMVR patients expired. This translated to a disproportionate number of Type 2A deaths (80.0% with intervention), but all were high/extreme surgical risk. The hybrid TMVR group consisted of 95.0% Type 1/2B patients and had a lower Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of operative mortality (7.4% vs. 9.2%, p = 0.43)/mortality.Conclusions: The highest mortality was seen in percutaneous TMVR Type 2A MAC patients, but they were at the greatest risk. Here we provide an objective MAC treatment algorithm for all-comers based on operability/anatomy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of this study was to assess 1-year clinical outcomes among high-risk patients with failed surgical mitral bioprostheses who underwent transseptal mitral valve-in-valve (MViV) with the SAPIEN 3 aortic transcatheter heart valve (THV) in the MITRAL (Mitral Implantation of Transcatheter Valves) trial. The MITRAL trial is the first prospective study evaluating transseptal MViV with the SAPIEN 3 aortic THV in high-risk patients with failed surgical mitral bioprostheses. High-risk patients with symptomatic moderate to severe or severe mitral regurgitation (MR) or severe mitral stenosis due to failed surgical mitral bioprostheses were prospectively enrolled. The primary safety endpoint was technical success. The primary THV performance endpoint was absence of MR grade ≥2+ or mean mitral valve gradient ≥10 mm Hg (30 days and 1 year). Secondary endpoints included procedural success and all-cause mortality (30 days and 1 year). Thirty patients were enrolled between July 2016 and October 2017 (median age 77.5 years [interquartile range (IQR): 70.3 to 82.8 years], 63.3% women, median Society of Thoracic Surgeons score 9.4% [IQR: 5.8% to 12.0%], 80% in New York Heart Association functional class III or IV). The technical success rate was 100%. The primary performance endpoint in survivors was achieved in 96.6% (28 of 29) at 30 days and 82.8% (24 of 29) at 1 year. Thirty-day all-cause mortality was 3.3% and was unchanged at 1 year. The only death was due to airway obstruction after swallowing several pills simultaneously 29 days post-MViV. At 1-year follow-up, 89.3% of patients were in New York Heart Association functional class I or II, the median mean mitral valve gradient was 6.6 mm Hg (interquartile range: 5.5 to 8.9 mm Hg), and all patients had MR grade ≤1+. Transseptal MViV in high-risk patients was associated with 100% technical success, low procedural complication rates, and very low mortality at 1 year. The vast majority of patients experienced significant symptom alleviation, and THV performance remained stable at 1 year. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The main aims of this study were to examine the incidence and in-hospital outcomes of mechanical and bioprosthetic surgical mitral valve replacement (SMVR) among patients with and without T2DM. Methods: We performed a retrospective study using the Spanish National Hospital Discharge Database from 2001 to 2015. We included patients with SMVR codified in their discharge report. We grouped admissions by diabetes status. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to compare outcomes of isolated SMVR. Results: We identified 42,937 patients (16.41% with T2DM). Incidence rates of mechanical and bioprosthetic SMVR were higher among T2DM patients than among non-T2DM patients. In both groups of patients, the use of bioprosthetic SMVR increased over time. The use of mechanical valves remained stable among T2DM patients. In T2DM and non-T2DM patients with mechanical SMVR, in hospital mortality (IHM) and MACCE decreased significantly (p < 0.001) from 2001 to 2015. T2DM patients had an overall 11.37% IHM, compared with 10.76% among non-T2DM patients (p = 0.176). Regarding MACCE figures were 14.72% vs. 14.22% (p = 0.320) after mechanical SMVR. Total crude IHM were 14.29% for T2DM patients and 15.13% for those without T2DM with bioprosthetic SMVR (p = 0.165) and 18.22 vs. 19.64%, for a MACCE (p = 0.185). Using PSM we found that the IHM and the MACCE of isolated SMVR did not differ significantly between patients with or without T2DM beside the type of valve replacement. Among T2DM patients, those who received bioprosthetic valves had higher IHM (14.29% vs. 11.37%; p = 0.003) and a higher rate of MACCE (18.22% vs. 14.72%; p = 0.001) than T2DM patients with mechanical SMVR. Conclusions: In Spain from 2001 to 2015, the incidence rates of hospitalization to undergo mechanical or bioprosthetic SMVR were higher among the population suffering T2DM than among the non-T2DM population. In both groups of patients the use of bioprosthetic SMVR increased over time and the use of mechanical valves remained stable in T2DM. T2DM patients have IHM and MACCE after mechanical and bioprosthetic SMVR which are not significantly different to those found among non-diabetic patients. Among T2DM patients, the crude IHM was significantly higher in those who received a bioprosthetic SMVR than those with mechanical SMVR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Despite the superiority of mitral valve repair, surgical mitral valve replacement (SMVR) remains an important intervention for patients with valve stenosis, infective endocarditis and complex mitral valve degeneration. There has been an increasing popularity in the worldwide use of biological valves due to the avoidance of long-term anti-coagulation and recent advancements in transcatheter techniques. We aim to evaluate the trend, early clinical outcomes and the choice of prostheses use in isolated SMVR over a 23 years period in the United Kingdom. All patients (n = 13,147) who underwent elective or urgent isolated SMVR from March 1996 to April 2019 were identified from the National Adult Cardiac Surgery Audit database. Trends in clinical outcomes, predicted/observed mortality of patients and the utilization of biological prostheses across 5 different age groups: <50, 50–59, 60–69, 70–79 and ≥80 years old were investigated. Early clinical outcomes associated with the use of mechanical and biological mitral valve prostheses in patients between the age of 60–70 years old were analysed. The number of isolated SMVR performed has remained stable with approximately 600 cases annually since 2010. The in-hospital/30-day mortality rate has decreased from 7.41% (1996) to 3.92% (2018), despite the EuroScore II increasing from 1.42% in 1996 to 2.43% in 2018. Biological prostheses usage increased across all age group, and particularly in the 60–69 and 70–79 group, from 17.86% and 53.85% in 1996 to 48.85% and 82.38% in 2018, respectively. The use of mechanical prostheses was reduced in patients between the age of 50–59 from 100% in 1996 to 80.65% in 2018. There were no differences in short term outcomes among patients aged 60–70 years who received either a biological or mechanical prostheses. There has been a significant reduction in surgical mitral valve replacement early in-hospital mortality, despite an observed increase in the risk profile of patients over 23 years. A shifting trend in valve replacement choices was observed with a rise in the use of biological prostheses, particularly within the 60–69 and 70–79 age group. Early in hospital outcomes for patients aged 60–70 were not determined by the implanted valve type. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The rising preference for percutaneous mitral valve-in-valve replacement (ViV TMVR) over redo surgical mitral valve replacement (MVR) is primarily due to its reduced bleeding risk. This report details a bloodless redo MVR performed for mitral stenosis post-ViV TMVR. We present detailed intraoperative findings, including images of the extracted bioprosthetic valves and cardiac anatomy, providing valuable insights into the surgical complexities encountered. The case underscores the importance of meticulous planning and execution in redo MVR, especially in patients with a history of multiple valve interventions. Additionally, this report discusses the potential complications associated with ViV TMVR, contributing to the evolving understanding of this procedure's long-term outcomes. Our findings highlight the need for careful consideration of patient-specific factors and the inherent risks of redo valve surgeries, aiming to improve patient outcomes in complex cardiac cases., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright © 2023, Tsukioka et al.)

Background: Paravalvular Leak (PVL) refers to the retrograde flow of blood in the space between an implanted cardiac valve and native tissue. These are unfortunately but luckily relatively uncommon complications of prosthetic valve replacement that, especially when moderate or severe, have important clinical consequences., Objective: Addressing PVL requires a multidisciplinary team to properly diagnose this process and choose the corrective option most likely to result in success., Methods: A comprehensive literature search was undertaken to formulate this narrative review., Results: This review highlights the complex nature of PVL and the promising contemporary treatments available., Conclusion: Clinicians should be adept at recognizing PVL and characterizing it using multimodality imaging. Using the many available tools and a multidisciplinary approach should lead to favorable outcomes in patients with PVL., (Copyright© Bentham Science Publishers; For any queries, please email at epub@benthamscience.net.)

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate tip-to-base intentional laceration of the anterior mitral leaflet to prevent left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (LAMPOON) in patients undergoing transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) in annuloplasty rings or surgical mitral valves., Background: LAMPOON is an effective adjunct to TMVR that prevents left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (LVOTO). Laceration is typically performed from the base to the tip of the anterior mitral leaflet. A modified laceration technique from leaflet tip to base may be effective in patients with a prosthesis that protects the aortomitral curtain., Methods: This is a multicenter, 21-patient, consecutive retrospective observational cohort. Patients underwent tip-to-base LAMPOON to prevent LVOTO and leaflet overhang, or therapeutically to lacerate a long anterior mitral leaflet risking or causing LVOTO. Outcomes were compared with findings from patients in the LAMPOON investigational device exemption trial with a prior mitral annuloplasty., Results: Twenty-one patients with a annuloplasty or valve prosthesis-protected mitral annulus underwent tip-to-base LAMPOON (19 preventive, 2 rescue). Leaflet laceration was successful in all and successfully prevented or treated LVOTO in all patients. No patients had significant LVOTO upon discharge. There were 2 cases of unintentional aortic valve injury (1 patient underwent emergency transcatheter aortic valve replacement and 1 patient underwent urgent surgical aortic valve replacement). In both cases, the patients had a supra-annular ring annuloplasty, and the retrograde aortic guiding catheter failed to insulate the guidewire lacerating surface from the aortic root. All patients survived to 30 days. Compared with classic retrograde LAMPOON, there was a trend toward shorter procedure time., Conclusions: Tip-to-base laceration is a simple, effective, and safe LAMPOON variant applicable to patients with an appropriately positioned mitral annular ring or bioprosthetic valve. Operators should take care to insulate the lacerating surface from adjacent structures., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures This work was supported by the Emory Structural Heart and Valve program intramural funds and by National Institutes of Health Grant No. Z01-HL006040. Dr. Lisko’s employer has contracts for BASILICA analysis with Medtronic and Edwards Lifesciences. Dr. Babaliaros has served as a consultant for Edwards Lifesciences and Abbott Vascular; has an employer with research contracts for clinical investigation of transcatheter aortic, mitral, and tricuspid devices from Edwards Lifesciences, Abbott Vascular, Medtronic, and Boston Scientific; and owns equity interest in Transmural Systems. Drs. Khan and Rogers have served as a proctor for Edwards Lifesciences and Medtronic. Drs. Khan, Lederman, and Rogers are co-inventors on patents, assigned to the National Institutes of Health, on devices for electrosurgical leaflet laceration. Dr. Paone has served as a consultant and proctor for Edwards Lifesciences. Dr. McCabe has served as consultant for Edwards Lifesciences, Boston Scientific, and Teleflex. Dr. Grubb has served as a speaker, proctor, and principal investigator for Edwards Lifesciences; served as a speaker, proctor, and advisory board member for Boston Scientific; and served as a speaker, proctor, principal investigator, advisory board member, and national principal investigator for Medtronic. Dr. Lederman has served as the principal investigator on a cooperative research and development agreement between National Institutes of Health and Edwards Lifesciences for transcatheter modification of the mitral valve. Dr. Greenbaum has served as a proctor for Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, and Abbott Vascular; owns an equity interest in Transmural Systems; and has an employer with research contracts for clinical investigation of transcatheter aortic, mitral, and tricuspid devices from Edwards Lifesciences, Abbott Vascular, Medtronic, and Boston Scientific. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objectives: To assess the clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes of patients diagnosed with infective endocarditis (IE) after edge-to-edge mitral valve repair with the MitraClip device., Background: Transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair has emerged as an alternative to surgery in high-risk patients. However, few data exist on IE following transcatheter mitral procedures., Methods: Four electronic databases (PubMed, Google Scholar, Embase, and Cochrane Library) were searched for original published studies on IE after edge-to-edge transcatheter mitral valve repair from 2003 to 2017., Results: A total of 10 publications describing 12 patients with definitive IE (median age 76 years, 55% men) were found. The mean logistic EuroSCORE/EuroSCORE II were 41% and 45%, respectively. The IE episode occurred early (within 12 months post-procedure) in nine patients (75%; within the first month in five patients). Staphylococcus aureus was the most frequent (60%) causal microorganism, and severe mitral regurgitation was present in all cases but one. Surgical mitral valve replacement (SMVR) was performed in most (67%) patients, and the mortality associated with the IE episode was high (42%)., Conclusions: IE following transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair is a rare but life-threatening complication, usually necessitating SMVR despite the high-risk profile of the patients. These results highlight the importance of adequate preventive measures and a prompt diagnosis and treatment of this serious complication., (© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)