Search

El presente artículo de investigación expone un análisis crítico fundamentado en lo expuesto por la jurisprudencia constitucional en consonancia con la descripción de la naturaleza jurídica del derecho disciplinario como rama independiente del derecho, generándose la pregunta problema así planteada ¿Cómo opera el activismo judicial en el procedimiento disciplinario? En tal sentido, la investigación plantea 3 objetivos, a saber: 1) establecer la naturaleza del activismo judicial en el proceso disciplinario; 2) descubrir cuáles son las causales del activismo judicial en el proceso disciplinario determinado en la Ley 734 de 2002; 3) determinar la forma de consolidar el derecho al debido proceso dentro del derecho disciplinario garante. Y así, luego de la valoración mencionada, se determinó lo que día tras día sucede en la esfera del derecho disciplinario en los procesos seguidos en contra de funcionarios públicos o de particulares que ejercen funciones públicas con el fin de establecer la forma en que opera el activismo judicial, en lo que respecta a la calificación de las faltas y a la imposición de sanciones. Así, en la actualidad nacional se evidencia la necesidad de elaborar e implementar una nueva normativa disciplinaria que contenga en todo el articulado el principio de legalidad que prevalece en todo el ordenamiento jurídico interno, en especial en la aplicación del ius punendi estatal. The present research article exposes a critical analysis based on the foregoing by the constitutional courts in accordance with the description of the legal nature of the disciplinary law as independent branch of law, generating the question problem thus raised: How operates the judicial activism in the disciplinary procedure? In this regard, the research raises 3 objectives namely: 1) establish the nature of judicial activism in the disciplinary process; 2) find out what are the grounds for judicial activism in the particular disciplinary process in the Act 734 of 2002; 3) determine how to strengthen the right to due process within the secured disciplinary law. And so, after the aforementioned valuation could be determined what happens day after day in the field of disciplinary law in the processes followed against public officials or private individuals who exercise public functions in order to establish how it works the judicial activism with respect to the qualification of the faults and the imposition of sanctions. Thus, currently national is evidence the need of develop and implement a new regulatory disciplinary that contains in all the articulated the principle of legality that prevails in all the ordering legal internal especially in application of the ius punendi state.

International audience; This article investigates various developments over that year that helped (or are helping) reshape European Union data privacy law, building around two important events: the Court of Justice of the European Union's Google Spain decision, applying a form of a "right to be forgotten," and the Paris terrorist attacks on the satirical journal Charlie Hebdo in January 2015 after which additional security measures involving websites and surveillance in France were adopted and advances on an EU directive on PNR data were made.The EU member state court decisions that came in the wake of the Google Spain decision and that give a right to individuals in the EU to have certain search engine results delisted, which raise issues for Internet search engines, publishers of information, and potentially other Internet intermediaries, are discussed, as are Google’s attempts to come to terms with the Google Spain decision.In addition, this article covers the continuing EU member state data protection agency enforcement action on Google's privacy policy, that were detailed in the author’s prior article – "European Data Privacy Law Developments," with lessons being drawn for businesses regarding privacy policies and data protection compliance generally.The surveillance measures discussed apply to electronic and other communication methods and introduce possibilities in France for mass data collection. Thus, the French legislation adopted in part in reaction to terrorist attacks, described by some as analog to the U.S. Patriot Act – evidences modifications related to security affecting the business legal environment for internet and telecommunications companies and others. Similarly, EU efforts to allow greater passenger data sharing following the Charlie Hebdo attacks also show the continuing tension between data privacy – considered a fundamental right in the EU – and security.Finally, ongoing work on the European Union data protection law reform – which will apply to non-European companies offering goods or services to individuals in Europe or monitoring their behavior – is detailed.

This panel will discuss the scope of the recently disclosed surveillance activities of the US National Security Agency, and the efforts underway in the EU and the United States to respond. The emphasis will be on promoting a political response to the unlawful surveillance. Speakers will include NGOS, government officials, and technical experts.

A Lei n. 8.080/1990 que rege o Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS) inclui no seu texto a Vigilância Epidemiológica/VE, ampliando o seu conceito. Todavia, legalmente este campo da saúde pública permanece subordinado à Lei n. 6.259/1975. Projetos de Lei vêm sendo elaborados para substituir esta última; porém, não estão em consonância com a Lei n. 8.080. Ademais, a promulgação do novo Regulamento Sanitário Internacional (RSI/2005) exige que o país elabore instrumento legal para atender às exigências desse Código Sanitário. Este artigo tem como objetivo apresentar algumas reflexões sobre os Ante-projetos de Lei apresentados e possíveis repercussões no processo de consolidação dos princípios que orientam a Reforma Sanitária Brasileira. Descreve-se a criação e desenvolvimento do Sistema Nacional de Vigilância Epidemiológica no Brasil e destaca-se que a Lei à qual a VE está subordinada, ainda que promulgada em plena Ditadura Militar, não previa sanções aos indivíduos. No entanto, os referidos Anteprojetos contemplam a instituição de infrações e crimes sanitários, fato rechaçado pela comunidade que milita no campo da Saúde Coletiva, por entender que tais dispositivos são autoritários, invasivos à liberdade individual e violam direitos que asseguram a dignidade da pessoa humana. Caso necessário, recomenda-se que uma nova Lei para o SNVS seja consentânea com o Estado Democrático de Direito e com princípios da Reforma Sanitária Brasileira e do SUS. Ressalta-se que medidas restritivas sejam transitórias e cuidadosamente elaboradas, para que, em nome da necessidade do uso de força para controle de riscos à saúde, atos arbitrários não venham a ser cometidos pelas autoridades. The Law 8.080/90 which regulates the Brazilian National Public Health System includes the Epidemiologic Surveillance, expanding the concept. However legally this field of public health remains subject to the Law 6.259/1975. Bills are being drafted to replace the latter, but they are not in accordance to the 8.080 Act. Morever the promulgation of the new International Health Regulations (RSI/2005) requires that the country elaborates legal instrument to meet the demands of the International Code. This article aims to present some reflections on the preliminaries drafts of laws presented and their possible implications in the process of consolidation of principles that guide the Brazilian Sanitary Reform. It describes the creation and development of the National System of Epidemiological Surveillance in Brazil, highlighting the Law to which the Epidemiologic Surveillance is subject. Moreover, this Law has been promulgated during the military dictatorship it did not mention punishments against individuals. However, these preliminaries drafts of projects include the establishment of health violations and crimes which is rejected by the community involved with the field of Public Health, once this community believes that such devices are authoritarians, restraints of the individual freedom and that they violate rights such as the human dignity. If it is necessary, it is recommended that a new Law for the National System of Epidemiological Surveillance should be in accordance to the Rule of Law and democratic principles of the Brazilian Health Reform and the Brazilian National Public Health System. It is emphasized that restrictive measures should be transitor and carefully elaborate to avoid arbitrary acts from authorities, on behalf of the necessity of using force to control risks to health.