94 results on '"transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS)"'
Search Results
2. The effects of prefrontal tDCS and hf-tRNS on the processing of positive and negative emotions evoked by video clips in first- and third-person
- Author
-
Pasquale La Malva, Adolfo Di Crosta, Giulia Prete, Irene Ceccato, Matteo Gatti, Eleonora D’Intino, Luca Tommasi, Nicola Mammarella, Rocco Palumbo, and Alberto Di Domenico
- Subjects
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) ,Transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) ,Emotional video ,Point of view (POV) ,Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) ,Medicine ,Science - Abstract
Abstract The causal role of the cerebral hemispheres in positive and negative emotion processing remains uncertain. The Right Hemisphere Hypothesis proposes right hemispheric superiority for all emotions, while the Valence Hypothesis suggests the left/right hemisphere's primary involvement in positive/negative emotions, respectively. To address this, emotional video clips were presented during dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) electrical stimulation, incorporating a comparison of tDCS and high frequency tRNS stimulation techniques and manipulating perspective-taking (first-person vs third-person Point of View, POV). Four stimulation conditions were applied while participants were asked to rate emotional video valence: anodal/cathodal tDCS to the left/right DLPFC, reverse configuration (anodal/cathodal on the right/left DLPFC), bilateral hf-tRNS, and sham (control condition). Results revealed significant interactions between stimulation setup, emotional valence, and POV, implicating the DLPFC in emotions and perspective-taking. The right hemisphere played a crucial role in both positive and negative valence, supporting the Right Hemisphere Hypothesis. However, the complex interactions between the brain hemispheres and valence also supported the Valence Hypothesis. Both stimulation techniques (tDCS and tRNS) significantly modulated results. These findings support both hypotheses regarding hemispheric involvement in emotions, underscore the utility of video stimuli, and emphasize the importance of perspective-taking in this field, which is often overlooked.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Comparative Efficacy of Novel Transcranial Random Noise Stimulation Versus Direct Current Stimulation on Augmenting Digital Mirror Therapy in Chronic Stroke
- Published
- 2023
4. Efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation for disorders of consciousness: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
- Author
-
Linghui Dong, Hui Li, Hui Dang, Xiaonian Zhang, Shouwei Yue, and Hao Zhang
- Subjects
BRAIN stimulation ,CONSCIOUSNESS disorders ,TRANSCRANIAL magnetic stimulation ,TRANSCRANIAL direct current stimulation ,BAYESIAN analysis - Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) in patients with disorders of consciousness (DoC) and compare differences in efficacy between different stimulation modalities. Methods: We searched the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and EMBASE databases for all studies published in English from inception to April 2023. Literature screening and quality assessment were performed independently by two investigators. Weighted mean differences (WMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to evaluate the therapeutic effects of NIBS. The Cochrane Q test and I2 statistic were used to evaluate heterogeneity between studies. Subgroup analysis was performed to identify the source of heterogeneity, and differences in efficacy between different stimulation modalities were compared by Bayesian analysis. Results: A total of 17 studies with 377 DoC patients were included. NIBS significantly improved the state of consciousness in DoC patients when compared to sham stimulation (WMD: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.46, 1.17; I2 = 78.2%, p = 0.000). When divided into subgroups according to stimulation modalities, the heterogeneity of each subgroup was significantly lower than before (I2: 0.00-30.4%, p >0.05); different stimulation modalities may be the main source of such heterogeneity. Bayesian analysis, based on different stimulation modalities, indicated that a patient's state of consciousness improved most significantly after repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). Diagnosis-based subgroup analysis showed that NIBS significantly improved the state of consciousness in patients with a minimal consciousness state (WMD: 1.11; 95% CI: 0.37, 1.86) but not in patients with unresponsive wakefulness syndrome or a vegetative state (WMD: 0.31; 95% CI: -0.09, 0.71). Subgroup analysis based on observation time showed that single treatment did not improve the state of consciousness in DoC patients (WMD: 0.28; 95% CI: -0.27, 0.82) while multiple treatments could (WMD: 1.05; 95% CI: 0.49, 1.61). Furthermore, NIBS had longterm effects on DoC patients (WMD: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.08-1.49). Conclusion: Available evidence suggests that the use of NIBS on patients with DoC is more effective than sham stimulation, and that rTMS of the left DLPFC may be the most prominent stimulation modality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. The effects of prefrontal tDCS and hf-tRNS on the processing of positive and negative emotions evoked by video clips in first- and third-person
- Author
-
La Malva, Pasquale, Di Crosta, Adolfo, Prete, Giulia, Ceccato, Irene, Gatti, Matteo, D’Intino, Eleonora, Tommasi, Luca, Mammarella, Nicola, Palumbo, Rocco, and Di Domenico, Alberto
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Editorial: Insights into the mechanisms of transcranial electrical stimulation.
- Author
-
Manjarrez, Elias, Campana, Gianluca, Mirasso, Claudio, and Battelli, Lorella
- Subjects
ELECTRIC stimulation ,TRANSCRANIAL alternating current stimulation ,TRANSCRANIAL direct current stimulation - Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. Corrigendum: Efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation for disorders of consciousness: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Author
-
Linghui Dong, Hui Li, Hui Dang, Xiaonian Zhang, Shouwei Yue, and Hao Zhang
- Subjects
non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) ,transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) ,repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) ,transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) ,disorders of consciousness (DOC) ,meta-analysis ,Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry ,RC321-571 - Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. Editorial: Insights into the mechanisms of transcranial electrical stimulation
- Author
-
Elias Manjarrez, Gianluca Campana, Claudio Mirasso, and Lorella Battelli
- Subjects
Transcranial Electrical Stimulation (TES) ,transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS) ,Transcranial Random Noise Stimulation (tRNS) ,transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) ,mechanisms of action (MoA) ,Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry ,RC321-571 - Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. Transcranial random noise stimulation over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex attenuates pain expectation and perception.
- Author
-
Li, Xiaoyun, Yao, Junjie, Lin, Xinxin, Chen, Shengxiong, Jin, Richu, and Peng, Weiwei
- Subjects
- *
PAIN perception , *PREFRONTAL cortex , *PAIN management , *PAIN measurement - Abstract
• Effects of single-session transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) over the left DLPFC on pain were assessed. • Pain expectation and perception decreased immediately after tRNS. • Analgesic effects of tRNS were mediated by modulating pain expectation. The dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) has been increasingly used as a neuromodulatory target in pain management. Transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) was shown to effectively elevate cortical excitability. Hence, this study aimed to characterize how tRNS over the left DLPFC affects pain expectation and perception, as well as the efficacy of conditioned-pain modulation (CPM) that reflects the function of the endogenous pain-inhibitory pathway. Using a randomized, double-blinded, and sham-controlled design, healthy participants were randomly recruited to receive tRNS with a direct current offset or sham stimulation. Their expectations and perceptions of painful electrocutaneous stimuli, as well as CPM efficacy were assessed before, immediately after, and 30 min after tRNS. Compared with sham stimulation, perceived-pain ratings to the painful stimuli, and expected-pain ratings before painful stimuli, attenuated immediately after tRNS, whereas this analgesic effect was ineffective 30 min after tRNS. Importantly, the immediate analgesia induced by tRNS could be accounted for by tRNS effect on attenuating expected-pain ratings before certain painful stimuli. However, CPM efficacy was not significantly affected by tRNS. These results demonstrate analgesia immediately after applying tRNS over the left DLPFC. This study provides evidence for analgesia of DLPFC-tRNS on an experimental pain model. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. Analgesia induced by anodal tDCS and high-frequency tRNS over the motor cortex: Immediate and sustained effects on pain perception
- Author
-
Junjie Yao, Xiaoyun Li, Wenyun Zhang, Xinxin Lin, Xiaohan Lyu, Wutao Lou, and Weiwei Peng
- Subjects
Pain ,Analgesia ,Expectation ,Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) ,Transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) ,Primary motor cortex (M1) ,Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry ,RC321-571 - Abstract
Background: Many studies have shown effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (a-tDCS) and high-frequency transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) on elevating cortical excitability. Moreover, tRNS with a direct current (DC)-offset is more likely to lead to increases in cortical excitability than solely tRNS. While a-tDCS over primary motor cortex (M1) has been shown to attenuate pain perception, tRNS + DC-offset may prove as an effective means for pain relief. Objective: This study aimed to examine effects of a-tDCS and high-frequency tRNS + DC-offset over M1 on pain expectation and perception, and assess whether these effects could be influenced by the certainty of pain expectation. Methods: Using a double-blinded and sham-controlled design, 150 healthy participants were recruited to receive a single-session a-tDCS, high-frequency tRNS + DC-offset, or sham stimulation over M1. The expectation and perception of electrical stimulation in certain and uncertain contexts were assessed at baseline, immediately after, and 30 min after stimulation. Results: Compared with sham stimulation, a-tDCS induced immediate analgesic effects that were greater when the stimulation outcome was expected with uncertainty; tRNS induced immediate and sustained analgesic effects that were mediated by decreasing pain expectation. Nevertheless, we found no strong evidence for tRNS being more effective for attenuating pain than a-tDCS. Conclusions: The analgesic effects of a-tDCS and tRNS showed different temporal courses, which could be related to the more sustained effectiveness of high-frequency tRNS + DC-offset in elevating cortical excitability. Moreover, expectations of pain intensity should be taken into consideration to maximize the benefits of neuromodulation.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
11. Analgesia induced by anodal tDCS and high-frequency tRNS over the motor cortex: Immediate and sustained effects on pain perception.
- Author
-
Yao, Junjie, Li, Xiaoyun, Zhang, Wenyun, Lin, Xinxin, Lyu, Xiaohan, Lou, Wutao, and Peng, Weiwei
- Abstract
Many studies have shown effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (a-tDCS) and high-frequency transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) on elevating cortical excitability. Moreover, tRNS with a direct current (DC)-offset is more likely to lead to increases in cortical excitability than solely tRNS. While a-tDCS over primary motor cortex (M1) has been shown to attenuate pain perception, tRNS + DC-offset may prove as an effective means for pain relief. This study aimed to examine effects of a-tDCS and high-frequency tRNS + DC-offset over M1 on pain expectation and perception, and assess whether these effects could be influenced by the certainty of pain expectation. Using a double-blinded and sham-controlled design, 150 healthy participants were recruited to receive a single-session a-tDCS, high-frequency tRNS + DC-offset, or sham stimulation over M1. The expectation and perception of electrical stimulation in certain and uncertain contexts were assessed at baseline, immediately after, and 30 min after stimulation. Compared with sham stimulation, a-tDCS induced immediate analgesic effects that were greater when the stimulation outcome was expected with uncertainty; tRNS induced immediate and sustained analgesic effects that were mediated by decreasing pain expectation. Nevertheless, we found no strong evidence for tRNS being more effective for attenuating pain than a-tDCS. The analgesic effects of a-tDCS and tRNS showed different temporal courses, which could be related to the more sustained effectiveness of high-frequency tRNS + DC-offset in elevating cortical excitability. Moreover, expectations of pain intensity should be taken into consideration to maximize the benefits of neuromodulation. • Effects of a-tDCS and high-frequency tRNS + DC-offset on pain were assessed. • A single-session a-tDCS induced immediate analgesic effects. • A single-session tRNS induced both immediate and sustained analgesic effects. • Analgesic effects of a-tDCS were greater when pain was expected with uncertainty. • Analgesic effects of tRNS were mediated by decreasing pain expectation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
12. Non-invasive Transcranial Electrical Stimulation in Movement Disorders
- Author
-
Jacky Ganguly, Aditya Murgai, Soumya Sharma, Dorian Aur, and Mandar Jog
- Subjects
non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) ,transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) ,transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) ,transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) ,transcranial pulsed current stimulation (tPCS) ,transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) ,Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry ,RC321-571 - Abstract
Dysfunction within large-scale brain networks as the basis for movement disorders is an accepted hypothesis. The treatment options for restoring network function are limited. Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation are now being studied to modify the network. Transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) is also a portable, cost-effective, and non-invasive way of network modulation. Transcranial direct current stimulation and transcranial alternating current stimulation have been studied in Parkinson’s disease, dystonia, tremor, and ataxia. Transcranial pulsed current stimulation and transcranial random noise stimulation are not yet studied enough. The literature in the use of these techniques is intriguing, yet many unanswered questions remain. In this review, we highlight the studies using these four potential tES techniques and their electrophysiological basis and consider the therapeutic implication in the field of movement disorders. The objectives are to consolidate the current literature, demonstrate that these methods are feasible, and encourage the application of such techniques in the near future.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
13. Non-invasive Transcranial Electrical Stimulation in Movement Disorders.
- Author
-
Ganguly, Jacky, Murgai, Aditya, Sharma, Soumya, Aur, Dorian, and Jog, Mandar
- Subjects
TRANSCRANIAL alternating current stimulation ,TRANSCRANIAL direct current stimulation ,MOVEMENT disorders ,TRANSCRANIAL magnetic stimulation ,BRAIN stimulation - Abstract
Dysfunction within large-scale brain networks as the basis for movement disorders is an accepted hypothesis. The treatment options for restoring network function are limited. Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation are now being studied to modify the network. Transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) is also a portable, cost-effective, and non-invasive way of network modulation. Transcranial direct current stimulation and transcranial alternating current stimulation have been studied in Parkinson's disease, dystonia, tremor, and ataxia. Transcranial pulsed current stimulation and transcranial random noise stimulation are not yet studied enough. The literature in the use of these techniques is intriguing, yet many unanswered questions remain. In this review, we highlight the studies using these four potential tES techniques and their electrophysiological basis and consider the therapeutic implication in the field of movement disorders. The objectives are to consolidate the current literature, demonstrate that these methods are feasible, and encourage the application of such techniques in the near future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
14. Transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) over prefrontal cortex does not influence the evaluation of facial emotions.
- Author
-
Prete, Giulia, Laeng, Bruno, and Tommasi, Luca
- Subjects
- *
PREFRONTAL cortex , *EMOTION recognition , *SUBLIMINAL perception , *EMOTIONS , *TASK analysis , *NUMBER theory - Abstract
Cerebral asymmetries for emotion processing are controversial, the right hemisphere being considered either superior in the recognition of all emotions, or superior in the recognition of negative emotions (together with the left-hemispheric superiority for positive emotions). In a number of previous studies, tDCS was applied on the left/right prefrontal cortex (PFC) in order to disentangle this issue, but the results remain controversial. We applied hf-tRNS/sham stimulation over the left/right PFC, during the presentation of neutral, angry and happy faces presented as broadband images (supraliminal condition), and as "hybrid" stimuli in which an emotional face in low spatial frequency is superimposed to the neutral expression of the same individual in high spatial frequency (subliminal condition), during a friendliness evaluation task. The results showed that angry and happy unfiltered stimuli were judged as the most unfriendly and friendly, respectively. Importantly, we found that hf-tRNS applied over the left/right PFC did not influence friendliness evaluations for emotional faces. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
15. Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation and transcranial random noise stimulation on working memory and task-related EEG in major depressive disorder.
- Author
-
Murphy, O.W., Hoy, K.E., Wong, D., Bailey, N.W., Fitzgerald, P.B., and Segrave, R.A.
- Subjects
- *
TRANSCRANIAL direct current stimulation , *SHORT-term memory , *MENTAL depression , *ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY - Abstract
• Study is the first sham-controlled comparison of tDCS and tRNS in depression. • Examined effects of stimulation on working memory and EEG. • tDCS increased upper alpha power during working memory maintenance. • tRNS did not alter oscillatory activity. • Neither tDCS nor tRNS improved working memory performance more than sham. To compare effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and transcranial random noise stimulation with a direct-current offset (tRNS + DC-offset) on working memory (WM) performance and task-related electroencephalography (EEG) in individuals with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). Using a sham-controlled, parallel-groups design, 49 participants with MDD received either anodal tDCS (N = 16), high-frequency tRNS + DC-offset (N = 16), or sham stimulation (N = 17) to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) for 20-minutes. The Sternberg WM task was completed with concurrent EEG recording before and at 5- and 25-minutes post-stimulation. Event-related synchronisation/desynchronisation (ERS/ERD) was calculated for theta, upper alpha, and gamma oscillations during WM encoding and maintenance. tDCS significantly increased parieto-occipital upper alpha ERS/ERD during WM maintenance, observed on EEG recorded 5- and 25-minutes post-stimulation. tRNS + DC-offset did not significantly alter WM-related oscillatory activity when compared to sham stimulation. Neither tDCS nor tRNS + DC-offset improved WM performance to a significantly greater degree than sham stimulation. Although tDCS induced persistent effects on WM-related oscillatory activity, neither tDCS nor tRNS + DC-offset enhanced WM performance in MDD. This reflects the first sham-controlled comparison of tDCS and tRNS + DC-offset in MDD. These findings directly contrast with evidence of tRNS-induced enhancements in WM in healthy individuals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
16. Noninvasive Brain Stimulation Techniques Can Modulate Cognitive Processing.
- Author
-
Veniero, Domenica, Strüber, Daniel, Thut, Gregor, and Herrmann, Christoph S.
- Subjects
BRAIN stimulation ,TRANSCRANIAL magnetic stimulation ,COGNITIVE therapy - Abstract
Recent methods that allow a noninvasive modulation of brain activity are able to modulate human cognitive behavior. Among these methods are transcranial electric stimulation and transcranial magnetic stimulation that both come in multiple variants. A property of both types of brain stimulation is that they modulate brain activity and in turn modulate cognitive behavior. Here, we describe the methods with their assumed neural mechanisms for readers from the economic and social sciences and little prior knowledge of these techniques. Our emphasis is on available protocols and experimental parameters to choose from when designing a study. We also review a selection of recent studies that have successfully applied them in the respective field. We provide short pointers to limitations that need to be considered and refer to the relevant papers where appropriate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
17. Analgesia induced by anodal tDCS and high-frequency tRNS over the motor cortex: Immediate and sustained effects on pain perception
- Author
-
Wenyun Zhang, Wutao Lou, Xinxin Lin, Xiaoyun Li, Junjie Yao, Weiwei Peng, and Xiaohan Lyu
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,media_common.quotation_subject ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Analgesic ,Biophysics ,Pain ,Stimulation ,Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry ,Audiology ,Transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) ,Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation ,Perception ,medicine ,Pain perception ,Humans ,Primary motor cortex (M1) ,media_common ,Transcranial direct-current stimulation ,business.industry ,Expectation ,General Neuroscience ,Motor Cortex ,Pain Perception ,Neuromodulation (medicine) ,Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Neurology (clinical) ,Primary motor cortex ,Analgesia ,business ,Motor cortex ,RC321-571 - Abstract
Background Many studies have shown effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (a-tDCS) and high-frequency transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) on elevating cortical excitability. Moreover, tRNS with a direct current (DC)-offset is more likely to lead to increases in cortical excitability than solely tRNS. While a-tDCS over primary motor cortex (M1) has been shown to attenuate pain perception, tRNS + DC-offset may prove as an effective means for pain relief. Objective This study aimed to examine effects of a-tDCS and high-frequency tRNS + DC-offset over M1 on pain expectation and perception, and assess whether these effects could be influenced by the certainty of pain expectation. Methods Using a double-blinded and sham-controlled design, 150 healthy participants were recruited to receive a single-session a-tDCS, high-frequency tRNS + DC-offset, or sham stimulation over M1. The expectation and perception of electrical stimulation in certain and uncertain contexts were assessed at baseline, immediately after, and 30 min after stimulation. Results Compared with sham stimulation, a-tDCS induced immediate analgesic effects that were greater when the stimulation outcome was expected with uncertainty; tRNS induced immediate and sustained analgesic effects that were mediated by decreasing pain expectation. Nevertheless, we found no strong evidence for tRNS being more effective for attenuating pain than a-tDCS. Conclusions The analgesic effects of a-tDCS and tRNS showed different temporal courses, which could be related to the more sustained effectiveness of high-frequency tRNS + DC-offset in elevating cortical excitability. Moreover, expectations of pain intensity should be taken into consideration to maximize the benefits of neuromodulation.
- Published
- 2021
18. Unilateral hf-tRNS over the temporal cortex does not influence pleasantness of musical chords.
- Author
-
Prete, Giulia, D'Anselmo, Anita, Brancucci, Alfredo, and Tommasi, Luca
- Subjects
- *
CEREBRAL hemispheres - Abstract
• Participants were asked to rate the pleasantness of musical chords. • hf-tRNS (1.5 mA, offset 0) was applied over the left/right auditory cortex. • Dissonant chords were rated as less pleasant than consonant chords. • hf-tRNS did not influence pleasantness of musical chords. • Unilateral temporal stimulation does not modulate musical pleasantness. The "consonance effect" is the pleasant and unpleasant evaluation attributed to consonant and dissonant music, respectively. Different studies in this domain revealed a left-hemispheric superiority for dissonance and a right-hemispheric superiority for consonance. We investigated the causal relationship between the consonance effect and the activity of the cerebral hemispheres by applying high frequency transcranial Random Noise Stimulation (hf-tRNS) over the left or right auditory cortex in a group of 24 healthy volunteers. Results confirm the consonance effect, dissonant chords being judged as more unpleasant than consonant chords, and show that hf-tRNS does not influence the pleasantness evaluations of chords. We speculate that the auditory cortex is directly involved in consonance and dissonance processing, but that pleasantness evaluations could take place in the anterior areas of the brain. This is the first evidence concerning the effects of the modulatory activity in each cerebral hemisphere and the consonance effect. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
19. Corrigendum: Efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation for disorders of consciousness: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
- Author
-
Dong L, Li H, Dang H, Zhang X, Yue S, and Zhang H
- Abstract
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1219043.]., (Copyright © 2023 Dong, Li, Dang, Zhang, Yue and Zhang.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
20. Efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation for disorders of consciousness: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
- Author
-
Dong L, Li H, Dang H, Zhang X, Yue S, and Zhang H
- Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) in patients with disorders of consciousness (DoC) and compare differences in efficacy between different stimulation modalities., Methods: We searched the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and EMBASE databases for all studies published in English from inception to April 2023. Literature screening and quality assessment were performed independently by two investigators. Weighted mean differences (WMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to evaluate the therapeutic effects of NIBS. The Cochrane Q test and I
2 statistic were used to evaluate heterogeneity between studies. Subgroup analysis was performed to identify the source of heterogeneity, and differences in efficacy between different stimulation modalities were compared by Bayesian analysis., Results: A total of 17 studies with 377 DoC patients were included. NIBS significantly improved the state of consciousness in DoC patients when compared to sham stimulation (WMD: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.46, 1.17; I2 = 78.2%, p = 0.000). When divided into subgroups according to stimulation modalities, the heterogeneity of each subgroup was significantly lower than before (I2 : 0.00-30.4%, p >0.05); different stimulation modalities may be the main source of such heterogeneity. Bayesian analysis, based on different stimulation modalities, indicated that a patient's state of consciousness improved most significantly after repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). Diagnosis-based subgroup analysis showed that NIBS significantly improved the state of consciousness in patients with a minimal consciousness state (WMD: 1.11; 95% CI: 0.37, 1.86) but not in patients with unresponsive wakefulness syndrome or a vegetative state (WMD: 0.31; 95% CI: -0.09, 0.71). Subgroup analysis based on observation time showed that single treatment did not improve the state of consciousness in DoC patients (WMD: 0.28; 95% CI: -0.27, 0.82) while multiple treatments could (WMD: 1.05; 95% CI: 0.49, 1.61). Furthermore, NIBS had long-term effects on DoC patients (WMD: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.08-1.49)., Conclusion: Available evidence suggests that the use of NIBS on patients with DoC is more effective than sham stimulation, and that rTMS of the left DLPFC may be the most prominent stimulation modality., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Dong, Li, Dang, Zhang, Yue and Zhang.)- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
21. Modulation of the dichotic right ear advantage during bilateral but not unilateral transcranial random noise stimulation.
- Author
-
Prete, Giulia, D'Anselmo, Anita, Tommasi, Luca, Brancucci, Alfredo, and D'Anselmo, Anita
- Subjects
- *
AUDITORY perception , *TREATMENT of language disorders , *TRANSCRANIAL direct current stimulation , *COGNITIVE ability , *BRAIN stimulation , *DICHOTIC listening tests - Abstract
Transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) has been increasingly adopted to modulate perceptual and cognitive functions, but the effects on auditory perception are still relatively uncharted. Starting from the evidence that a stronger right ear advantage effect (REA) in dichotic listening positively correlates with speech sound processing, the present study was aimed at modulating the REA by means of high-frequency transcranial Random Noise Stimulation (hf-tRNS). Stimulation was applied over the auditory cortex (AC) either unilaterally (Experiment 1, N = 50) or bilaterally (Experiment 2, N = 24) during a verbal dichotic listening task. The results confirmed the REA both during the sham and the tRNS session in both Experiments. Importantly, a significant enhancement of the REA was found during bilateral hf-tRNS with respect to sham (Experiment 1). No modulation was found when hf-tRNS was applied over the left or right AC with the reference electrode placed on the contralateral shoulder, with respect to sham (Experiment 2). This finding is discussed in the light of previous stimulation studies facing the modulation of hemispheric asymmetries. Our results suggest that the effectiveness of bilateral hf-tRNS in modulating basic speech processing mechanisms could be exploited in the treatment of language impairments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
22. Transcranial Electric Stimulation Can Impair Gains during Working Memory Training and Affects the Resting State Connectivity
- Author
-
Annie Möller, Federico Nemmi, Kim Karlsson, and Torkel Klingberg
- Subjects
transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) ,working memory training ,fMRI ,resting state functional connectivity ,transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) ,Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry ,RC321-571 - Abstract
Transcranial electric stimulation (tES) is a promising technique that has been shown to improve working memory (WM) performance and enhance the effect of cognitive training. However, experimental set up and electrode placement are not always determined based on neurofunctional knowledge about WM, leading to inconsistent results. Additional research on the effects of tES grounded on neurofunctional evidence is therefore necessary. Sixty young, healthy, volunteers, assigned to six different groups, participated in 5 days of stimulation or sham treatment. Twenty-five of these subjects also participated in MRI acquisition. We performed three experiments: In the first one, we evaluated tES using either direct current stimulation (tDCS) with bilateral stimulation of the frontal or parietal lobe; in the second one, we used the same tDCS protocol with a different electrode placement (i.e., supraorbital cathode); in the third one, we used alternating currents (tACS) of 35 Hz, applied bilaterally to either the frontal or parietal lobes. The behavioral outcome measure was the WM capacity (i.e., number of remembered spatial position) during the 5 days of training. In a subsample of subjects we evaluated the neural effects of tDCS by measuring resting state connectivity with functional MRI, before and after the 5 days of tDCS and visuo-spatial WM training. We found a significant impairment of WM training-related gains associated with parietal tACS and frontal tDCS. Five days of tDCS stimulation was also associated with significant change in resting state connectivity revealed by multivariate pattern analysis. None of the stimulation paradigms resulted in improved WM performance or enhanced WM training gains. These results show that tES can have negative effects on cognitive plasticity and affect resting-state functional connectivity.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
23. Modulation of Illusory Auditory Perception by Transcranial Electrical Stimulation
- Author
-
Giulia Prete, Anita D'Anselmo, Luca Tommasi, and Alfredo Brancucci
- Subjects
Deutsch's illusion ,auditory cortex ,transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) ,transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) ,acoustic stimuli ,Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry ,RC321-571 - Abstract
The aim of the present study was to test whether transcranial electrical stimulation can modulate illusory perception in the auditory domain. In two separate experiments we applied transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (anodal/cathodal tDCS, 2 mA; N = 60) and high-frequency transcranial Random Noise Stimulation (hf-tRNS, 1.5 mA, offset 0; N = 45) on the temporal cortex during the presentation of the stimuli eliciting the Deutsch's illusion. The illusion arises when two sine tones spaced one octave apart (400 and 800 Hz) are presented dichotically in alternation, one in the left and the other in the right ear, so that when the right ear receives the high tone, the left ear receives the low tone, and vice versa. The majority of the population perceives one high-pitched tone in one ear alternating with one low-pitched tone in the other ear. The results revealed that neither anodal nor cathodal tDCS applied over the left/right temporal cortex modulated the perception of the illusion, whereas hf-tRNS applied bilaterally on the temporal cortex reduced the number of times the sequence of sounds is perceived as the Deutsch's illusion with respect to the sham control condition. The stimulation time before the beginning of the task (5 or 15 min) did not influence the perceptual outcome. In accordance with previous findings, we conclude that hf-tRNS can modulate auditory perception more efficiently than tDCS.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
24. Transcranial Random Noise Stimulation (tRNS) Shapes the Processing of Rapidly Changing Auditory Information
- Author
-
Katharina S. Rufener, Philipp Ruhnau, Hans-Jochen Heinze, and Tino Zaehle
- Subjects
transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) ,auditory processing ,auditory temporal resolution ,stochastic resonance ,resonance frequency ,Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry ,RC321-571 - Abstract
Neural oscillations in the gamma range are the dominant rhythmic activation pattern in the human auditory cortex. These gamma oscillations are functionally relevant for the processing of rapidly changing acoustic information in both speech and non-speech sounds. Accordingly, there is a tight link between the temporal resolution ability of the auditory system and inherent neural gamma oscillations. Transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) has been demonstrated to specifically increase gamma oscillation in the human auditory cortex. However, neither the physiological mechanisms of tRNS nor the behavioral consequences of this intervention are completely understood. In the present study we stimulated the human auditory cortex bilaterally with tRNS while EEG was continuously measured. Modulations in the participants’ temporal and spectral resolution ability were investigated by means of a gap detection task and a pitch discrimination task. Compared to sham, auditory tRNS increased the detection rate for near-threshold stimuli in the temporal domain only, while no such effect was present for the discrimination of spectral features. Behavioral findings were paralleled by reduced peak latencies of the P50 and N1 component of the auditory event-related potentials (ERP) indicating an impact on early sensory processing. The facilitating effect of tRNS was limited to the processing of near-threshold stimuli while stimuli clearly below and above the individual perception threshold were not affected by tRNS. This non-linear relationship between the signal-to-noise level of the presented stimuli and the effect of stimulation further qualifies stochastic resonance (SR) as the underlying mechanism of tRNS on auditory processing. Our results demonstrate a tRNS related improvement in acoustic perception of time critical auditory information and, thus, provide further indices that auditory tRNS can amplify the resonance frequency of the auditory system.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
25. Acute Benefits of Transcranial Random Noise Stimulation on Sensory and Motor Processing
- Author
-
Potok, Weronika, Wenderoth, Nicole, Polania, Rafael, and Kiper, Daniel
- Subjects
noise ,NIBS ,neuromodulation ,stochastic resonance ,Transcranial electrical stimulation ,Transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) ,Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) ,Threshold ,Contrast sensitivity ,neurophysiology ,Life sciences ,ddc:570 ,ddc:610 ,Medical sciences, medicine - Abstract
In everyday life countless stimuli are delivered to our central nervous system from the environment. The processing of incoming information is not free of noise. Even though it is counterintuitive at first, some level of background noise can have a positive impact on signal processing in the central nervous system. It has been hypothesized that neural processing can benefit from added noise via a Stochastic Resonance (SR) phenomenon. SR is a general mechanism that enhances the response of nonlinear systems to weak subthreshold signals by adding an optimal level of random noise. Using transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS), electrical noise can be added centrally to cortical circuits to modulate brain function. In this thesis, we investigated the immediate online effects of noise on the central nervous system. We probed the responsiveness of motor and visual systems in the presence and absence of electrical noise. Additionally, we explored the effects of high-frequency non- stochastic electrical stimulation on sensory processing. We began by reviewing the current literature and delineating the effects of electrical noise at the cellular, systems, and behavioral levels. We discussed the putative mechanism underpinning the effect of electrical noise stimulation on neural processing and how electrical noise might be utilized to augment sensory and motor function. In the first study, we investigated the acute effects of noise on the neural population level in awake human participants. We showed that the responsiveness of the primary motor cortex (M1) increases immediately when electrical noise is added via tRNS. In the second study, we explored the acute effects of tRNS delivered to two connected yet anatomically remote neural populations within the visual system, namely the primary visual cortex (V1) and the retina. We observed a significant decrease in the visual contrast detection threshold compared to baseline during tRNS delivery to V1 but not to the retina, suggesting that tRNS affects these neural populations differently. In the third study, we empirically tested the theoretical prediction that in addition to stochastic signals, non-stochastic signals can also cause resonance effects. We found that non-random high-frequency transcranial alternating current stimulation (hf-tACS) applied to V1 lowers the contrast detection threshold, reflecting enhanced visual detection performance. Altogether our work addresses the potential use of acute electrical noise added to cortical circuits to modulate physiology and enhance brain function. Our findings are consistent with the hypothesis that neural processing can benefit from added noise via a SR phenomenon, but also demonstrate the potential use of alternative waveforms to induce resonance-like effects. More broadly, our work sheds new light on a possible mechanism underpinning the effect of acute electrical noise stimulation on neural processing and provides a new paradigm for testing SR theory predictions in the human brain. Our results highlight the general importance and relevance of SR-like mechanisms in the human brain and will potentially lead to new developments and applications across various disciplines, including basic neuroscience, neurophysiology, computational biology, and clinical research.
- Published
- 2022
26. Does transcranial electrical stimulation enhance corticospinal excitability of the motor cortex in healthy individuals? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
- Author
-
Dissanayaka, Thusharika, Zoghi, Maryam, Farrell, Michael, Egan, Gary F., and Jaberzadeh, Shapour
- Subjects
- *
BRAIN stimulation , *MOTOR cortex , *TRANSCRANIAL alternating current stimulation , *TRANSCRANIAL direct current stimulation , *TRANSCRANIAL magnetic stimulation - Abstract
Numerous studies have explored the effects of transcranial electrical stimulation ( tES) - including anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (a- tDCS), cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (c- tDCS), transcranial alternative current stimulation ( tACS), transcranial random noise stimulation ( tRNS) and transcranial pulsed current stimulation ( tPCS) - on corticospinal excitability ( CSE) in healthy populations. However, the efficacy of these techniques and their optimal parameters for producing robust results has not been studied. Thus, the aim of this systematic review was to consolidate current knowledge about the effects of various parameters of a- tDCS, c- tDCS, tACS, tRNS and tPCS on the CSE of the primary motor cortex (M1) in healthy people. Leading electronic databases were searched for relevant studies published between January 1990 and February 2017; 126 articles were identified, and their results were extracted and analysed using RevMan software. The meta-analysis showed that a- tDCS application on the dominant side significantly increases CSE ( P < 0.01) and that the efficacy of a- tDCS is dependent on current density and duration of application. Similar results were obtained for stimulation of M1 on the non-dominant side ( P = 0.003). The effects of a- tDCS reduce significantly after 24 h ( P = 0.006). Meta-analysis also revealed significant reduction in CSE following c- tDCS ( P < 0.001) and significant increases after tRNS ( P = 0.03) and tPCS ( P = 0.01). However, tACS effects on CSE were only significant when the stimulation frequency was ≥140 Hz. This review provides evidence that tES has substantial effects on CSE in healthy individuals for a range of stimulus parameters. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
27. Enhancing anger perception in older adults by stimulating inferior frontal cortex with high frequency transcranial random noise stimulation.
- Author
-
Yang, Tao and Banissy, Michael J.
- Subjects
- *
TRANSCRANIAL Doppler ultrasonography , *RANDOM noise theory , *STOCHASTIC information theory , *STOCHASTIC processes , *FRONTAL lobe - Abstract
Extensive behavioural evidence has shown that older people have declined ability in facial emotion perception. Recent work has begun to examine the neural mechanism that contribute to this, and potential tools to support emotion perception during aging. The aim of this study was to investigate whether high frequency tRNS applied to the inferior frontal cortex would enhance facial expression perception in older adults. Healthy aged adults (60+ years) were randomly assigned to receive active high-frequency or sham tRNS targeted at bilateral inferior frontal cortices. Each group completed tests of facial identity perception, facial happiness perception and facial anger perception. These tasks were completed before and after stimulation. The results showed that, compared to the sham group, the active tRNS group showed greater gains in performance after stimulation in anger perception (relative to performance before stimulation). The same tRNS stimulation did not significantly change performance on the two other face perception tasks assessing facial identity and facial happiness perception. Examination of how inter-individual variability related to changes in anger perception following tRNS indicated that the degree of performance change in anger perception following active tRNS to inferior frontal cortex was predicted by baseline ability and gender of older adult participants. The findings suggest that high frequency tRNS may be a potential tool to aid anger perception in typical aging, but flag that performance variability and gender may interact with stimulation leading to different outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
28. Transcranial Electric Stimulation Can Impair Gains during Working Memory Training and Affects the Resting State Connectivity.
- Author
-
Möller, Annie, Nemmi, Federico, Karlsson, Kim, and Klingberg, Torkel
- Subjects
ELECTRIC stimulation ,SHORT-term memory ,COGNITIVE training ,DIRECT currents ,MAGNETIC resonance imaging - Abstract
Transcranial electric stimulation (tES) is a promising technique that has been shown to improve working memory (WM) performance and enhance the effect of cognitive training. However, experimental set up and electrode placement are not always determined based on neurofunctional knowledge about WM, leading to inconsistent results. Additional research on the effects of tES grounded on neurofunctional evidence is therefore necessary. Sixty young, healthy, volunteers, assigned to six different groups, participated in 5 days of stimulation or sham treatment. Twenty-five of these subjects also participated in MRI acquisition. We performed three experiments: In the first one, we evaluated tES using either direct current stimulation (tDCS) with bilateral stimulation of the frontal or parietal lobe; in the second one, we used the same tDCS protocol with a different electrode placement (i.e., supraorbital cathode); in the third one, we used alternating currents (tACS) of 35 Hz, applied bilaterally to either the frontal or parietal lobes. The behavioral outcome measure was the WM capacity (i.e., number of remembered spatial position) during the 5 days of training. In a subsample of subjects we evaluated the neural effects of tDCS by measuring resting state connectivity with functional MRI, before and after the 5 days of tDCS and visuo-spatial WM training. We found a significant impairment of WM training-related gains associated with parietal tACS and frontal tDCS. Five days of tDCS stimulation was also associated with significant change in resting state connectivity revealed by multivariate pattern analysis. None of the stimulation paradigms resulted in improved WM performance or enhanced WM training gains. These results show that tES can have negative effects on cognitive plasticity and affect resting-state functional connectivity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
29. Modulation of Illusory Auditory Perception by Transcranial Electrical Stimulation.
- Author
-
Prete, Giulia, D'Anselmo, Anita, Tommasi, Luca, and Brancucci, Alfredo
- Subjects
BRAIN stimulation ,ELECTRIC stimulation ,VECTION - Abstract
The aim of the present study was to test whether transcranial electrical stimulation can modulate illusory perception in the auditory domain. In two separate experiments we applied transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (anodal/cathodal tDCS, 2mA; N = 60) and high-frequency transcranial Random Noise Stimulation (hf-tRNS, 1.5mA, offset 0; N = 45) on the temporal cortex during the presentation of the stimuli eliciting the Deutsch's illusion. The illusion arises when two sine tones spaced one octave apart (400 and 800 Hz) are presented dichotically in alternation, one in the left and the other in the right ear, so that when the right ear receives the high tone, the left ear receives the low tone, and vice versa. The majority of the population perceives one high-pitched tone in one ear alternating with one low-pitched tone in the other ear. The results revealed that neither anodal nor cathodal tDCS applied over the left/right temporal cortex modulated the perception of the illusion, whereas hf-tRNS applied bilaterally on the temporal cortex reduced the number of times the sequence of sounds is perceived as the Deutsch's illusion with respect to the sham control condition. The stimulation time before the beginning of the task (5 or 15 min) did not influence the perceptual outcome. In accordance with previous findings, we conclude that hf-tRNS can modulate auditory perception more efficiently than tDCS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
30. Transcranial Random Noise Stimulation (tRNS) Shapes the Processing of Rapidly Changing Auditory Information.
- Author
-
Rufener, Katharina S., Ruhnau, Philipp, Heinze, Hans-Jochen, and Zaehle, Tino
- Subjects
RANDOM noise theory ,INFORMATION theory ,OSCILLATIONS ,AUDITORY processing disorder ,STOCHASTIC resonance ,ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY - Abstract
Neural oscillations in the gamma range are the dominant rhythmic activation pattern in the human auditory cortex. These gamma oscillations are functionally relevant for the processing of rapidly changing acoustic information in both speech and non-speech sounds. Accordingly, there is a tight link between the temporal resolution ability of the auditory system and inherent neural gamma oscillations. Transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) has been demonstrated to specifically increase gamma oscillation in the human auditory cortex. However, neither the physiological mechanisms of tRNS nor the behavioral consequences of this intervention are completely understood. In the present study we stimulated the human auditory cortex bilaterally with tRNS while EEG was continuously measured. Modulations in the participants' temporal and spectral resolution ability were investigated by means of a gap detection task and a pitch discrimination task. Compared to sham, auditory tRNS increased the detection rate for near-threshold stimuli in the temporal domain only, while no such effect was present for the discrimination of spectral features. Behavioral findings were paralleled by reduced peak latencies of the P50 and N1 component of the auditory event-related potentials (ERP) indicating an impact on early sensory processing. The facilitating effect of tRNS was limited to the processing of near-threshold stimuli while stimuli clearly below and above the individual perception threshold were not affected by tRNS. This non-linear relationship between the signal-to-noise level of the presented stimuli and the effect of stimulation further qualifies stochastic resonance (SR) as the underlying mechanism of tRNS on auditory processing. Our results demonstrate a tRNS related improvement in acoustic perception of time critical auditory information and, thus, provide further indices that auditory tRNS can amplify the resonance frequency of the auditory system. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
31. Alteration of political belief by non- invasive brain stimulation
- Author
-
Caroline eChawke and Ryota eKanai
- Subjects
dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) ,unconscious processing ,Cognitive Dissonance ,belief formation ,transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) ,political neuroscience ,Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry ,RC321-571 - Abstract
People generally have imperfect introspective access to the mechanisms underlying their political beliefs, yet can confidently communicate the reasoning that goes into their decision making process. An innate desire for certainty and security in ones beliefs may play an important and somewhat automatic role in motivating the maintenance or rejection of partisan support. The aim of the current study was to clarify the role of the DLPFC in the alteration of political beliefs. Recent neuroimaging studies have focused on the association between the DLPFC (a region involved in the regulation of cognitive conflict and error feedback processing) and reduced affiliation with opposing political candidates. As such, this study used a method of non- invasive brain simulation (tRNS) to enhance activity of the bilateral DLPFC during the incorporation of political campaign information. These findings indicate a crucial role for this region in political belief formation. However, enhanced activation of DLPFC does not necessarily result in the specific rejection of political beliefs. In contrast to the hypothesis the results appear to indicate a significant increase in conservative values regardless of participant’s initial political orientation and the political campaign advertisement they were exposed to.
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
32. Transcranial Random Noise Stimulation-induced plasticity is NMDA-receptor independent but sodium-channel blocker and benzodiazepines sensitive
- Author
-
Leila eChaieb, Andrea eAntal, and Walter ePaulus
- Subjects
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) ,transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) ,transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) ,lorazepam (LOR: GABAA receptor agonist) ,ropinirole (ROP: D2/D3 receptor agonist) ,carbamazepine (CBZ: sodium channel blocker) ,Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry ,RC321-571 - Abstract
Background: Application of transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) between 0.1 and 640 Hz of the primary motor cortex (M1) for 10 minutes induces a persistent excitability increase lasting for at least 60 minutes. However, the mechanism of tRNS-induced cortical excitability alterations is not yet fully understood. Objective: The main aim of this study was to get first efficacy data with regard to the possible neuronal effect of tRNS. Methods: Single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was used to measure levels of cortical excitability before and after combined application of tRNS at an intensity of 1mA for 10mins stimulation duration and a pharmacological agent (or sham) on 8 healthy male participants. Results: The sodium channel blocker carbamazepine showed a tendency towards inhibiting MEPs 5-60 mins poststimulation. The GABAA agonist lorazepam suppressed tRNS-induced cortical excitability increases at 0-20 and 60 min time points. The partial NMDA receptor agonist D-cycloserine, the NMDA receptor antagonist dextromethorphan and the D2/D3 receptor agonist ropinirole had no significant effects on the excitability increases seen with tRNS.Conclusions: In contrast to transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), aftereffects of tRNS are seem to be not NMDA receptor dependent and can be suppressed by benzodiazepines suggesting that tDCS and tRNS depend upon different mechanisms.
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
33. Non-Pharmacological Tools for Neuroenhancement Neuroethical Issues.
- Author
-
Erhardt, Julija and Štrac, Dubravka Švob
- Subjects
PHARMACOLOGY ,NEUROSCIENCES ,TRANSCRANIAL magnetic stimulation ,INFORMATION theory ,SOCIAL ethics - Abstract
Copyright of Synthesis Philosophica is the property of Croatian Philosophical Society and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
34. Enhancing duration processing with parietal brain stimulation.
- Author
-
Dormal, Valérie, Javadi, Amir-Homayoun, Pesenti, Mauro, Walsh, Vincent, and Cappelletti, Marinella
- Subjects
- *
TRANSCRANIAL direct current stimulation , *CEREBRAL cortex , *PARIETAL lobe , *AUTOMATICITY (Learning process) , *TRANSCRANIAL magnetic stimulation - Abstract
Numerosity and duration are thought to share common magnitude-based mechanisms in brain regions including the right parietal and frontal cortices like the supplementary motor area, SMA. Numerosity and duration are, however, also different in several intrinsic features. For instance, in a quantification context, numerosity is known for being more automatically accessed than temporal events, and durations are by definition sequential whereas numerosity can be both sequential and simultaneous. Moreover, numerosity and duration processing diverge in terms of their neuronal correlates. Whether these observed neuronal specificities can be accounted for by differences in automaticity or presentation-mode is however not clear. To address this issue, we used brain stimulation (transcranial random noise stimulation, tRNS) to the right parietal cortex or the SMA combined with experimental stimuli differing in their level of automaticity (numerosity and duration) and presentation mode (sequential or simultaneous). Compared to a no stimulation group, performance changed in duration but not in numerosity categorisation following right parietal but not SMA stimulation. These results indicate that the right parietal cortex is critical for duration processing, and suggest that tRNS has a stronger effect on less automatic processes such as duration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
35. A technical guide to tDCS, and related non-invasive brain stimulation tools.
- Author
-
Woods, A.J., Antal, A., Bikson, M., Boggio, P.S., Brunoni, A.R., Celnik, P., Cohen, L.G., Fregni, F., Herrmann, C.S., Kappenman, E.S., Knotkova, H., Liebetanz, D., Miniussi, C., Miranda, P.C., Paulus, W., Priori, A., Reato, D., Stagg, C., Wenderoth, N., and Nitsche, M.A.
- Subjects
- *
BRAIN stimulation , *BRAIN physiology , *CENTRAL nervous system , *NEUROSCIENCES , *COGNITION - Abstract
Transcranial electrical stimulation (tES), including transcranial direct and alternating current stimulation (tDCS, tACS) are non-invasive brain stimulation techniques increasingly used for modulation of central nervous system excitability in humans. Here we address methodological issues required for tES application. This review covers technical aspects of tES, as well as applications like exploration of brain physiology, modelling approaches, tES in cognitive neurosciences, and interventional approaches. It aims to help the reader to appropriately design and conduct studies involving these brain stimulation techniques, understand limitations and avoid shortcomings, which might hamper the scientific rigor and potential applications in the clinical domain. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
36. Non-invasive Brain Stimulation and Auditory Verbal Hallucinations: New Techniques and Future Directions.
- Author
-
Moseleya, Peter, Alderson-Day, Ben, Ellison, Amanda, Jardri, Renaud, and Fernyhough, Charles
- Subjects
BRAIN stimulation ,AUDITORY hallucinations ,TRANSCRANIAL alternating current stimulation ,THERAPEUTICS - Abstract
Auditory verbal hallucinations (AVHs) are the experience of hearing a voice in the absence of any speaker. Results from recent attempts to treat AVHs with neurostimulation (rTMS or tDCS) to the left temporoparietal junction have not been conclusive, but suggest that it may be a promising treatment option for some individuals. Some evidence suggests that the therapeutic effect of neurostimulation on AVHs may result from modulation of cortical areas involved in the ability to monitor the source of self-generated information. Here, we provide a brief overview of cognitive models and neurostimulation paradigms associated with treatment of AVHs, and discuss techniques that could be explored in the future to improve the efficacy of treatment, including alternating current and random noise stimulation. Technical issues surrounding the use of neurostimulation as a treatment option are discussed (including methods to localize the targeted cortical area, and the state-dependent effects of brain stimulation), as are issues surrounding the acceptability of neurostimulation for adolescent populations and individuals who experience qualitatively different types of AVH. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
37. Alteration of Political Belief by Non-invasive Brain Stimulation.
- Author
-
Chawke, Caroline and Kanai, Ryota
- Subjects
BRAIN stimulation ,DECISION making ,BELIEF & doubt ,POLITICAL campaigns & society ,RANDOM noise theory ,PREFRONTAL cortex ,NEUROSCIENCES - Abstract
People generally have imperfect introspective access to the mechanisms underlying their political beliefs, yet can confidently communicate the reasoning that goes into their decision making process. An innate desire for certainty and security in ones beliefs may play an important and somewhat automatic role in motivating the maintenance or rejection of partisan support. The aim of the current study was to clarify the role of the DLPFC in the alteration of political beliefs. Recent neuroimaging studies have focused on the association between the DLPFC (a region involved in the regulation of cognitive conflict and error feedback processing) and reduced affiliation with opposing political candidates. As such, this study used a method of non-invasive brain simulation (tRNS) to enhance activity of the bilateral DLPFC during the incorporation of political campaign information. These findings indicate a crucial role for this region in political belief formation. However, enhanced activation of DLPFC does not necessarily result in the specific rejection of political beliefs. In contrast to the hypothesis the results appear to indicate a significant increase in conservative values regardless of participant's initial political orientation and the political campaign advertisement they were exposed to. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
38. What do you feel if I apply transcranial electric stimulation? Safety, sensations and secondary induced effects.
- Author
-
Fertonani, Anna, Ferrari, Clarissa, and Miniussi, Carlo
- Subjects
- *
TRANSCRANIAL direct current stimulation , *SOMATOSENSORY cortex , *SENSES , *DISCONTENT , *ADVERSE health care events , *COMPARATIVE studies , *DATA analysis - Abstract
Objective The goals of this work are to report data regarding a large number of stimulation sessions and to use model analyses to explain the similarities or differences in the sensations induced by different parameters of tES application. Methods We analysed sensation data relative to 693 different tES sessions. In particular, we studied the effects on sensations induced by different types of current, categories of polarity and frequency, different timing, levels of current density and intensity, different electrode sizes and different electrode locations (areas). Results The application of random or fixed alternating current stimulation (i.e., tRNS and tACS) over the scalp induced less sensation compared with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), regardless of the application parameters. Moreover, anodal tDCS induced more annoyance in comparison to other tES. Additionally, larger electrodes induced stronger sensations compared with smaller electrodes, and higher intensities were more strongly perceived. Timing of stimulation, montage and current density did not influence sensations perception. The analyses demonstrated that the induced sensations could be clustered on the basis of the type of somatosensory system activated. Finally and most important no adverse events were reported. Conclusion Induced sensations are modulated by electrode size and intensity and mainly pertain to the cutaneous receptor activity of the somatosensory system. Moreover, the procedure currently used to perform placebo stimulation may not be totally effective when compared with anodal tDCS. Significance The reported observations enrich the literature regarding the safety aspects of tES, confirming that it is a painless and safe technique. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
39. Facial gender and hemispheric asymmetries: A hf-tRNS study.
- Author
-
Prete, Giulia, Malatesta, Gianluca, and Tommasi, Luca
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
40. The differential effect of low- versus high-frequency random noise stimulation in the treatment of tinnitus.
- Author
-
Joos, Kathleen, Ridder, Dirk, and Vanneste, Sven
- Subjects
- *
TINNITUS treatment , *NEUROPLASTICITY , *RANDOM noise theory , *BRAIN stimulation , *IMMUNOMODULATORS , *PSYCHOLOGICAL distress , *TRANSCRANIAL direct current stimulation - Abstract
Tinnitus is the sensation of a ringing, buzzing, roaring or hissing sound in the absence of an external sound. As tinnitus has been related to hyperactivity and synaptic plasticity changes in the central auditory system, invasive and noninvasive neuromodulation methods have been used to interfere with this underlying mechanism to reduce tinnitus loudness and distress. Recently, transcranial random noise stimulation applied over the auditory cortex induced a more pronounced effect on tinnitus loudness than transcranial direct current and alternating current stimulation. We performed tRNS over the temporoparietal cortex in 154 patients with non-pulsatile tinnitus. A total of 119 patients received low-frequency tRNS (lf-tRNS), 19 high-frequency tRNS (hf-tRNS) and 16 whole frequency spectrum tRNS (wf-tRNS). The effect was evaluated by using the numeric rating scale loudness and distress pre- and post-stimulation. This study revealed a significant reduction in tinnitus loudness when lf-tRNS and hf-tRNS were applied as well as a reduction in tinnitus-related distress with lf-tRNS. Moreover, we observed a significantly more pronounced reduction in loudness and distress in pure tone (PT) tinnitus compared to narrow band noise (NBN) tinnitus when hf-tRNS was applied, a difference that could not be obtained with lf-tRNS. Based on these results, tRNS might be a promising treatment option for non-pulsatile tinnitus; however, we cannot yet provide a clear mechanistic explanation for the different results obtained with different types of stimulation, i.e., lf-tRNS, hf-tRNS and wf-tRNS, or with different types of tinnitus, i.e., PT and NBN tinnitus. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
41. Transcranial random noise stimulation-induced plasticity is NMDA-receptor independent but sodium-channel blocker and benzodiazepines sensitive.
- Author
-
Chaieb, Leila, Antal, Andrea, and Paulus, Walter
- Subjects
TRANSCRANIAL magnetic stimulation ,BRAIN stimulation ,EVOKED potentials (Electrophysiology) ,METHYL aspartate receptors ,GLUTAMATE receptors - Abstract
Background: Application of transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) between 0.1 and 640 Hz of the primary motor cortex (M1) for 10 min induces a persistent excitability increase lasting for at least 60 min. However, the mechanism of tRNS-induced cortical excitability alterations is not yet fully understood. Objective: The main aim of this study was to get first efficacy data with regard to the possible neuronal effect of tRNS. Methods: Single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was used to measure levels of cortical excitability before and after combined application of tRNS at an intensity of 1mA for 10 min stimulation duration and a pharmacological agent (or sham) on eight healthy male participants. Results: The sodium channel blocker carbamazepine showed a tendency toward inhibiting MEPs 5-60 min poststimulation. The GABA
A agonist lorazepam suppressed tRNS-induced cortical excitability increases at 0-20 and 60 min time points. The partial NMDA receptor agonist D-cycloserine, the NMDA receptor antagonist dextromethorphan and the D2 /D3 receptor agonist ropinirole had no significant effects on the excitability increases seen with tRNS. Conclusions: In contrast to transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), aftereffects of tRNS are seem to be not NMDA receptor dependent and can be suppressed by benzodiazepines suggesting that tDCS and tRNS depend upon different mechanisms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
42. Combining functional magnetic resonance imaging with transcranial electrical stimulation
- Author
-
Catarina eSaiote, Zsolt eTuri, Walter ePaulus, and Andrea eAntal
- Subjects
fMRI ,Neuromodulation ,transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) ,non-invasive brain stimulation ,transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) ,transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) ,Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry ,RC321-571 - Abstract
Transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) is a neuromodulatory method with promising potential for basic research and as a therapeutic tool. The most explored type of tES is transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), but also transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) and transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) have been shown to affect cortical excitability, behavioral performance and brain activity. Although providing indirect measure of brain activity, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) can tell us more about the global effects of stimulation in the whole brain and what is more, on how it modulates functional interactions between brain regions, complementing what is known from electrophysiological methods such as measurement of motor evoked potentials. With this review, we aim to present the studies that have combined these techniques, the current approaches and discuss the results obtained so far.
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
43. Non-invasive Transcranial Electrical Stimulation in Movement Disorders
- Author
-
Mandar Jog, Jacky Ganguly, Aditya Murgai, Soumya Sharma, and Dorian Aur
- Subjects
Movement disorders ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Stimulation ,Review ,lcsh:RC321-571 ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,medicine ,transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) ,lcsh:Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry ,transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) ,030304 developmental biology ,Transcranial alternating current stimulation ,Dystonia ,0303 health sciences ,transcranial pulsed current stimulation (tPCS) ,Transcranial direct-current stimulation ,business.industry ,General Neuroscience ,medicine.disease ,Transcranial magnetic stimulation ,Electrophysiology ,Brain stimulation ,transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) ,medicine.symptom ,non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) ,business ,transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) ,Neuroscience ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery - Abstract
Dysfunction within large-scale brain networks as the basis for movement disorders is an accepted hypothesis. The treatment options for restoring network function are limited. Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation are now being studied to modify the network. Transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) is also a portable, cost-effective, and non-invasive way of network modulation. Transcranial direct current stimulation and transcranial alternating current stimulation have been studied in Parkinson’s disease, dystonia, tremor, and ataxia. Transcranial pulsed current stimulation and transcranial random noise stimulation are not yet studied enough. The literature in the use of these techniques is intriguing, yet many unanswered questions remain. In this review, we highlight the studies using these four potential tES techniques and their electrophysiological basis and consider the therapeutic implication in the field of movement disorders. The objectives are to consolidate the current literature, demonstrate that these methods are feasible, and encourage the application of such techniques in the near future.
- Published
- 2020
44. Combining functional magnetic resonance imaging with transcranial electrical stimulation.
- Author
-
Saiote, Catarina, Turi, Zsolt, Paulus, Walter, and Antal, Andrea
- Subjects
MAGNETIC resonance imaging ,ELECTRIC stimulation ,DIAGNOSTIC imaging ,MAGNETIC fields ,RANDOM noise theory - Abstract
Transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) is a neuromodulatory method with promising potential for basic research and as a therapeutic tool. The most explored type of tES is transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), but also transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) and transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) have been shown to affect cortical excitability, behavioral performance and brain activity. Although providing indirect measure of brain activity, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) can tell us more about the global effects of stimulation in the whole brain and what is more, on how it modulates functional interactions between brain regions, complementing what is known from electrophysiological methods such as measurement of motor evoked potentials. With this review, we aim to present the studies that have combined these techniques, the current approaches and discuss the results obtained so far. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
45. The Role of Timing in the Induction of Neuromodulation in Perceptual Learning by Transcranial Electric Stimulation.
- Author
-
Pirulli, Cornelia, Fertonani, Anna, and Miniussi, Carlo
- Abstract
Abstract: Background: Transcranial electric stimulation (tES) protocols are able to induce neuromodulation, offering important insights to focus and constrain theories of the relationship between brain and behavior. Previous studies have shown that different types of tES (i.e., direct current stimulation – tDCS, and random noise stimulation – tRNS) induce different facilitatory behavioral effects. However to date is not clear which is the optimal timing to apply tES in relation to the induction of robust facilitatory effects. Objective/hypothesis: The goal of this work was to investigate how different types of tES (tDCS and tRNS) can modulate behavioral performance in the healthy adult brain in relation to their timing of application. We applied tES protocols before (offline) or during (online) the execution of a visual perceptual learning (PL) task. PL is a form of implicit memory that is characterized by an improvement in sensory discrimination after repeated exposure to a particular type of stimulus and is considered a manifestation of neural plasticity. Our aim was to understand if the timing of tES is critical for the induction of differential neuromodulatory effects in the primary visual cortex (V1). Methods: We applied high-frequency tRNS, anodal tDCS and sham tDCS on V1 before or during the execution of an orientation discrimination task. The experimental design was between subjects and performance was measured in terms of d' values. Results: The ideal timing of application varied depending on the stimulation type. tRNS facilitated task performance only when it was applied during task execution, whereas anodal tDCS induced a larger facilitation if it was applied before task execution. Conclusion: The main result of this study is the finding that the timing of identical tES protocols yields opposite effects on performance. These results provide important guidelines for designing neuromodulation induction protocols and highlight the different optimal timing of the two excitatory techniques. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
46. Transcranial electrical stimulation (tES – tDCS; tRNS, tACS) methods.
- Author
-
Paulus, Walter
- Subjects
- *
TRANSCRANIAL magnetic stimulation , *ELECTROMAGNETIC induction , *NEURAL stimulation , *NEUROPLASTICITY , *ELECTRIC noise - Abstract
Weak transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) with a homogenous DC field at intensities of around 1 mA induces long-lasting changes in the brain. tDCS can be used to manipulate brain excitability via membrane polarisation: cathodal stimulation hyperpolarises, while anodal stimulation depolarises the resting membrane potential, whereby the induced after-effects depend on polarity, duration and intensity of the stimulation. A variety of other parameters influence tDCS effects; co-application of neuropharmacologically active drugs may most impressively prolong or even reverse stimulation effects. Transcranial alternating stimulation (tACS) and random noise stimulation (tRNS) are used to interfere with ongoing neuronal oscillations and also finally produce neuroplastic effects if applied with appropriate parameters. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]
- Published
- 2011
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
47. Increasing Human Brain Excitability by Transcranial High-Frequency Random Noise Stimulation.
- Author
-
Terney, Daniella, Chaieb, Leila, Moliadze, Vera, Antal, Andrea, and Paulus, Walter
- Subjects
- *
BRAIN stimulation , *BRAIN function localization , *NEURAL stimulation , *ELECTRICITY in medicine , *ELECTRIC stimulation , *ELECTRODIAGNOSIS , *NEUROLOGY - Abstract
For >20 years, noninvasive transcranial stimulation techniques like repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and direct current stimulation (tDCS) have been used to induce neuroplastic-like effects in the human cortex, leading to the activity-dependent modification of synaptic transmission. Here, we introduce a novel method of electrical stimulation: transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS), whereby a random electrical oscillation spectrum is applied over the motor cortex. tRNS induces consistent excitability increases lasting 60 min after stimulation. These effects have been observed in 80 subjects through both physiological measures and behavioral tasks. Higher frequencies (100-640 Hz) appear to be responsible for generating this excitability increase, an effect thatmaybe attributed to the repeated opening of Na+channels. In terms of efficacy tRNS appears to possess at least the same therapeutic potential as rTMS/tDCSin diseases such as depression, while furthermore avoiding the constraint of current flow direction sensitivity characteristic of tDCS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2008
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
48. A technical guide to tDCS, and related non-invasive brain stimulation tools
- Author
-
Adam J. Woods, Andre R. Brunoni, Felipe Fregni, Walter Paulus, Emily S. Kappenman, David Liebetanz, Leonardo G. Cohen, Davide Reato, Michael A. Nitsche, Christoph Herrmann, Pablo Celnik, Carlo Miniussi, Helena Knotkova, Andrea Antal, Marom Bikson, Charlotte J. Stagg, Pedro C. Miranda, Paulo S. Boggio, and Nicole Wenderoth
- Subjects
Methodology review ,Design ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Clinical Neurology ,Stimulation ,Transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) ,Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation ,050105 experimental psychology ,Article ,03 medical and health sciences ,(tDCS) ,0302 clinical medicine ,Cognition ,Physiology (medical) ,medicine ,Safety ,Technical guide ,Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) ,Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) ,Transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) ,(tACS) Transcranial random noise stimulation ,Humans ,0501 psychology and cognitive sciences ,Transcranial direct-current stimulation ,(tRNS) ,05 social sciences ,Non invasive ,food and beverages ,Brain ,Sensory Systems ,Transcranial alternating current stimulation ,Technical Guide ,Neurology ,Brain stimulation ,Transcranial direct current stimulation ,Neurology (clinical) ,Psychology ,Neuroscience ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery - Abstract
Transcranial electrical stimulation (tES), including transcranial direct and alternating current stimulation (tDCS, tACS) are non-invasive brain stimulation techniques increasingly used for modulation of central nervous system excitability in humans. Here we address methodological issues required for tES application. This review covers technical aspects of tES, as well as applications like exploration of brain physiology, modelling approaches, tES in cognitive neurosciences, and interventional approaches. It aims to help the reader to appropriately design and conduct studies involving these brain stimulation techniques, understand limitations and avoid shortcomings, which might hamper the scientific rigor and potential applications in the clinical domain., Clinical Neurophysiology, 127 (2), ISSN:1388-2457, ISSN:1872-8952
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
49. The causal involvement of the right supramarginal gyrus in the subjective experience of time: A hf-tRNS study.
- Author
-
Prete, Giulia, Lucafò, Chiara, Malatesta, Gianluca, and Tommasi, Luca
- Subjects
- *
AUDITORY perception , *VISUAL perception , *VISUAL accommodation , *TIME perception , *RIGHTS - Abstract
• Duration-tuned neural populations in the right SMG play a role in time perception. • Adaptation can elicit aftereffects in the perceived duration of time intervals. • hf-tRNS revealed the causal role of the right SMG in subjective experience of time. Neural populations in the supramarginal gyrus (SMG) of the right hemisphere have been shown to be involved in processing the subjective experience of time, particularly because of their selectivity to specific temporal durations. To directly investigate this relationship, we applied high-frequency transcranial Random Noise Stimulation (hf-tRNS) on the right SMG during a duration judgment task: 24 participants were required to judge the duration of a test visual stimulus (350, 450, 550, 650 ms) as shorter or longer than the duration of a reference auditory stimulus (500 ms). In half of the trials this procedure was preceded by a visual adaptation paradigm, used as a tool to manipulate the subjective experience of time: for 12 participants the adaptor was shorter than the test (250 ms), and for 12 participants it was longer than the test (750 ms). All participants performed an online hf-tRNS session and a sham control session. For each participant and for each condition, the Point of Subjective Equality (PSE) was calculated and results revealed an expected negative aftereffect in the group exposed to a longer adaptor. Moreover, hf-tRNS modulated participants' performance with respect to sham, confirming the involvement of the right SMG in temporal experience. Importantly, only in the group exposed to the longer adaptor, PSE values were higher during stimulation than during sham, only after the adaptation procedure (no difference emerged in trials without adaptation). This pattern of results confirms recent neuroimaging findings, and adds a direct evidence of the causal role of this area in subjective time experience. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
50. Facial gender and hemispheric asymmetries: A hf-tRNS study
- Author
-
Giulia Prete, Luca Tommasi, and Gianluca Malatesta
- Subjects
General Neuroscience ,05 social sciences ,Biophysics ,Transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) ,050105 experimental psychology ,Gender categorization ,lcsh:RC321-571 ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Hemispheric asymmetry ,0501 psychology and cognitive sciences ,Neurology (clinical) ,Faces ,Psychology ,lcsh:Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery ,Cognitive psychology - Published
- 2017
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.