Search

Sex differences in the outcomes of advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and the profiles of tumor-infiltrating immune cells (TIICs) remain unclear. We retrospectively evaluated data from 563 patients with RCC receiving systemic therapy, including first-line dual ICI combinations (i.e., immunotherapy [IO]-IO), combinations of ICIs with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) (i.e., IO-TKI), TKI monotherapy, and subsequent nivolumab monotherapy. Survival and tumor response were compared between the sexes in each treatment group, and TIIC profiles were compared using 116 RCC tumor samples analyzed by flow cytometry. Progression-free survival (PFS) was shorter in female than in male patients in the IO-IO (p = 0.0227) and nivolumab monotherapy (p = 0.0478) groups. Furthermore, sex remained an independent factor for shorter PFS after adjusting for covariates in the IO-IO (p = 0.0340) and nivolumab monotherapy (p = 0.0322) groups. In contrast, PFS was not significantly different between sexes in the IO-TKI or TKI monotherapy groups (p > 0.05). Overall survival and objective response rates were not significantly different between the sexes in any of the treatment groups (p > 0.05). Some TIIC populations, including that of CD8 + T cells (p = 0.0096), decreased to a greater extent in female than in male patients in the advanced-stage population. In conclusion, the effectiveness of ICIs on PFS was lower in female patients than in male patients, potentially because of the different profiles of the immune microenvironment, particularly the decreased number of CD8 + T cells in females. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BackgroundMelanoma is among the most malignant immunologic tumor types and is associated with high mortality. However, a considerable number of melanoma patients cannot benefit from immunotherapy owing to individual differences. This study attempts to build a novel prediction model of melanoma that fully considers individual differences in the tumor microenvironment.MethodsAn immune-related risk score (IRRS) was constructed based on cutaneous melanoma data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Single-sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA) was used to calculate immune enrichment scores of 28 immune cell signatures. We performed pairwise comparisons to obtain scores for cell pairs based on the difference in the abundance of immune cells within each sample. The resulting cell pair scores, in the form of a matrix of relative values of immune cells, formed the core of the IRRS.ResultsThe area under the curve (AUC) for the IRRS was over 0.700, and when the IRRS was combined with clinical information, the AUC reached 0.785, 0.817, and 0.801 for the 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival, respectively. Differentially expressed genes between the two groups were enriched in staphylococcal infection and estrogen metabolism pathway. The low IRRS group showed a better immunotherapeutic response and exhibited more neoantigens, richer T-cell receptor and B-cell receptor diversity, and higher tumor mutation burden.ConclusionThe IRRS enables a good prediction of prognosis and immunotherapy effect, based on the difference in the relative abundance of different types of infiltrating immune cells, and could provide support for further research in melanoma.

Background: Despite the progress in early diagnosis and treatment, prognosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAAD) is still poor. Basic leucine zipper and W2 domain-containing protein 1 (BZW1) and protein 2 (BZW2) are attached to the basic leucine zipper (bZIP) superfamily. Recently, BZW1 was identified as an important role in glycolysis of PAAD. However, the comprehensive reports about BZW1/2 in PAAD are not sufficient. Methods: RNA-seq data in the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) databases were retrospectively analyzed. We explored the expression of BZW1/2 in PAAD tissues and the associations between BZW1/2 and prognosis. In addition, the potential roles of BZW1/2 in tumor microenvironment (TME) of PAAD were analyzed. Finally, clinicopathological data of 49 patients with PAAD in our institution were collected. Immunohistochemistry was used to determine the expression of BZW1/2 in PAAD samples. Results: BZW1 and BZW2 were upregulated in PAAD tissues compared to normal tissues (p < 0.05). The expression of BZW1/2 were not significantly correlated with gender, grade and stage of PAAD (p > 0.05). High expression of BZW2 was an independent predictor for poor prognosis of PAAD (HR 1.834, 95%CI 1.303-2.581, p = 0.001). And a nomogram to predict overall survival (OS) of PAAD was established with a C-index of 0.685. BZW1 and BZW2 expression were positively associated with T cell mediated immune response to tumor cell and Th2 cells in xCell database. Tumor Immune Single-Cell Hub (TISCH) analyses indicated that BZW1 and BZW2 were mainly expressed in B cells and malignant cells. External cohort furtherly validated that high expression of BZW1 and BZW2 were predictors for poor prognosis of PAAD. Conclusion: We found that BZW1 and BZW2 are highly expressed in malignant cells and B cells in the TME of PAAD. BZW2 is an independent predictor for OS of PAAD. BZW1 and BZW2 expression are positively associated with T cell mediated immune response to tumor cell and Th2 cells in PAAD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Liver hepatocellular carcinoma (LIHC) remains a global health challenge with a low early diagnosis rate and high mortality. Therefore, finding new biomarkers for diagnosis and prognosis is still one of the current research priorities.Methods: Based on the variation of gene expression patterns in different stages, the LIHC-development genes (LDGs) were identified by differential expression analysis. Then, prognosis-related LDGs were screened out to construct the LIHC-unfavorable gene set (LUGs) and LIHC-favorable gene set (LFGs). Gene set variation analysis (GSVA) was conducted to build prognostic scoring models based on the LUGs and LFGs. ROC curve analysis and univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis were carried out to verify the diagnostic and prognostic utility of the two GSVA scores in two independent datasets. Additionally, the key LCGs were identified by the intersection analysis of the PPI network and univariate Cox regression and further evaluated their performance in expression level and prognosis prediction. Single-sample GSEA (ssGSEA) was performed to understand the correlation between the two GSVA enrichment scores and immune activity.Result: With the development of LIHC, 83 LDGs were gradually upregulated and 247 LDGs were gradually downregulated. Combining with LIHC survival analysis, 31 LUGs and 32 LFGs were identified and used to establish the LIHC-unfavorable GSVA score (LUG score) and LIHC-favorable GSVA score (LFG score). ROC curve analysis and univariate/multivariate Cox regression analysis suggested the LUG score and LFG score could be great indicators for the early diagnosis and prognosis prediction. Four genes (ESR1, EHHADH, CYP3A4, and ACADL) were considered as the key LCGs and closely related to good prognosis. The frequency of TP53 mutation and copy number variation (CNV) were high in some LCGs. Low-LFG score patients have active metabolic activity and a more robust immune response. The high-LFG score patients characterized immune activation with the higher infiltration abundance of type I T helper cells, DC, eosinophils, and neutrophils, while the high-LUG score patients characterized immunosuppression with the higher infiltration abundance of type II T helper cells, TRegs, and iDC. The high- and low-LFG score groups differed significantly in immunotherapy response scores, immune checkpoints expression, and IC50 values of common drugs.Conclusion: Overall, the LIHC-progression characteristic genes can be great diagnostic and prognostic signatures and the two GSVA score systems may become promising indices for guiding the tumor treatment of LIHC patients.

Immunoscore can accurately predict the prognosis of patients with stage I–III colorectal cancer. However, whether it can be used to predict the prognosis of colorectal cancer peritoneal metastases (CRCPM) remains to be validated. We analyzed peritoneal and ovarian metastases in 68 patients with CRCPM. The immunoscore (IS) was based on the infiltration level of CD3+ and CD8+ T cells, whereas the TBM score was derived from the infiltration level of CD3+, CD8+, CD20+ and CD163+ cells to tumor microenvironment (TME). The predictive value of IS and TBM scores for relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients with CRCPM was analyzed using Kaplan Meier curve and Cox multivariate models. Significant difference in the infiltration levels of different immune cell subtypes in primary lesions, peritoneal metastasis and ovarian metastasis were compared using t-test.CRCPM patients with high IS (>1), high TBM1 score (≥2) or high TBM2 score (≥2) had a significantly longer OS (IS: median OS, not reached vs 23 months, p = .0078; TBM1: not reached vs 21.5 months, p = .013; TBM2: 39.3 months vs 15.2 months, p = .001). On the other hand, patients with high IS had a trend of improved RFS (13.4 months vs 11.0 months, p = .067). However, TBM1 and TBM2 score has no predictive utility for RFS. Multivariate analysis revealed that IS, TBM1 and TBM2 can accurately predict OS, but not RFS. Finally, the infiltration level of CD3+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, CD20+ B cells, and CD68+ macrophage was significantly higher in peritoneal metastatic tissue and ovarian metastatic tissue, relative to primary tumor tissues.The IS and TBM score of peritoneal metastases could effectively predict OS of patients with CRCPM. Peritoneal metastasis of colorectal cancer decreased the infiltration level of T and B cells.

Abstract Background Prognostic factors aid in the stratification and treatment of cancer. This study evaluated prognostic importance of tumor infiltrating immune cell in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma. Methods Profiles of infiltrating immune cells and clinicopathological data were available for 78 OSCC patients with a median follow-up of 48 months. The infiltrating intensity of CD8, CD4, T-bet, CD68 and CD57 positive cells were assessed by immunohistochemistry. Chi-square test was used to compare immune markers expression and clinicopathological parameters. Univariate and multivariate COX proportional hazard models were used to assess the prognostic discriminator power of immune cells. The predictive potential of immune cells for survival of OSCC patients was determined using ROC and AUC. Results The mean value of CD8, CD4, T-bet, CD68 and CD57 expression were 28.99, 62.06, 8.97, 21.25 and 15.75 cells per high-power field respectively. The patient cohort was separated into low and high expression groups by the mean value. Higher CD8 expression was associated with no regional lymph node metastasis (p = 0.033). Patients with more abundant stroma CD57+ cells showed no metastasis into regional lymph node (p = 0.005), and early clinical stage (p = 0.016). The univariate COX regression analyses showed that no lymph node involvement (p