Search

Background: Patients with primary Bone Sarcoma and Giant Cell Tumors in the lower extremities often require major surgery involving tumor prostheses. The postoperative course for this patient group can be complex and influenced by various factors and challenges that demand careful nursing care. This study aims to identify challenges related to the nursing care of individuals with primary bone tumors following surgery for tumor prostheses in the lower extremities. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of 15 patients treated at Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark, between November 5. 2016, and April 1. 2020 was conducted by medical record review, focusing on challenges related to postoperative nursing care. All patients with the surgery code "Bone Excision" were identified within the surgery booking system and screened for eligibility. Results: Patients experienced postoperative challenges such as severe pain, prolonged time to mobilization (mean: 4 days), and defecation (mean: 5 days). The mean length of stay at the Rigshospitalet was 13 days. Furthermore, eleven patients (73%) reported disrupted sleep and nausea. Conclusion: Patients undergoing tumor prosthesis surgery in the lower extremities face considerable postoperative challenges that contribute to a prolonged hospital stay. These challenges, including severe pain, delayed mobilization, and gastrointestinal issues, significantly impact recovery. The findings highlight the urgent need for targeted nursing interventions to address these issues effectively. Enhanced pain management protocols, early mobilization strategies, and comprehensive postoperative care plans are essential to improve patient outcomes and reduce the length of hospital stays. Addressing these challenges through dedicated nursing care is crucial for optimizing the recovery process for patients receiving lower extremity tumor prostheses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Patients with primary Bone Sarcoma and Giant Cell Tumors in the lower extremities often require major surgery involving tumor prostheses. The postoperative course for this patient group can be complex and influenced by various factors and challenges that demand careful nursing care. This study aims to identify challenges related to the nursing care of individuals with primary bone tumors following surgery for tumor prostheses in the lower extremities. Methods A retrospective cohort study of 15 patients treated at Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark, between November 5. 2016, and April 1. 2020 was conducted by medical record review, focusing on challenges related to postoperative nursing care. All patients with the surgery code “Bone Excision” were identified within the surgery booking system and screened for eligibility. Results Patients experienced postoperative challenges such as severe pain, prolonged time to mobilization (mean: 4 days), and defecation (mean: 5 days). The mean length of stay at the Rigshospitalet was 13 days. Furthermore, eleven patients (73%) reported disrupted sleep and nausea. Conclusion Patients undergoing tumor prosthesis surgery in the lower extremities face considerable postoperative challenges that contribute to a prolonged hospital stay. These challenges, including severe pain, delayed mobilization, and gastrointestinal issues, significantly impact recovery. The findings highlight the urgent need for targeted nursing interventions to address these issues effectively. Enhanced pain management protocols, early mobilization strategies, and comprehensive postoperative care plans are essential to improve patient outcomes and reduce the length of hospital stays. Addressing these challenges through dedicated nursing care is crucial for optimizing the recovery process for patients receiving lower extremity tumor prostheses.

Sarcomas of the extremities are rare entities, the treatment of which requires special expertise. Even if the treatment of patients is always interdisciplinary, the surgical R0 resection is the key point of each curatively intended treatment. In addition to resection in sano, the aim is to preserve the extremities and function, so that defect reconstruction after resection plays a decisive role. Due to the heterogeneity of tumors as well as their localization and extent, reconstruction is always an individually adapted treatment. Modular tumor endoprostheses are often used in this context, which can be constructed according to the size of the defect. The transplantation of autologous or allogeneic bone is also frequently used alone or as an additive procedure. Patient-specific (mega)prostheses are used particularly for pelvic tumors. Defect reconstruction using scaffold-based procedures from the field of tissue engineering is being tested as a promising procedure for the future. This article provides an overview of the treatment principles for sarcomas of the extremities and their individual reconstruction options. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Tumor prostheses of the distal femur after revision surgery is associated with high rates of aseptic loosening, which has introduced great challenges to the survival of patients, but only a few studies have evaluated their X-ray imaging. The purpose of this study was to analyze the risk factors for recurrence of aseptic loosening and make recommendations to reduce the incidence of aseptic loosening after revision surgery of tumor prostheses in the distal femur. Method A retrospective analysis was performed on 23 patients who had revision surgery for distal femur prostheses due to aseptic loosening between June 2002 and June 2021. They were divided into two groups based on the condition of the prostheses after revision surgery: loosening group (9 patients) and control group (14 patients). Following the initial replacement, the length and diameter of the prosthetic intramedullary stem were measured through the standard full-length anteroposterior X-ray imaging of both lower limbs. The osteotomy length, femoral length and diameter, femoral intramedullary stem diameter, hip-knee-ankle angle (HKAA), mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), mechanical medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA), and so on were measured as well. Following that, statistical analysis was performed. Results Patients in the loosening group had statistically significant differences in the ratio of prostheses length to femur length (71.89 ± 6.62) and the ratio of intramedullary stem diameter to femoral diameter (25.50 ± 6.90) (P

Background: Tumor prostheses of the distal femur after revision surgery is associated with high rates of aseptic loosening, which has introduced great challenges to the survival of patients, but only a few studies have evaluated their X-ray imaging. The purpose of this study was to analyze the risk factors for recurrence of aseptic loosening and make recommendations to reduce the incidence of aseptic loosening after revision surgery of tumor prostheses in the distal femur. Method: A retrospective analysis was performed on 23 patients who had revision surgery for distal femur prostheses due to aseptic loosening between June 2002 and June 2021. They were divided into two groups based on the condition of the prostheses after revision surgery: loosening group (9 patients) and control group (14 patients). Following the initial replacement, the length and diameter of the prosthetic intramedullary stem were measured through the standard full-length anteroposterior X-ray imaging of both lower limbs. The osteotomy length, femoral length and diameter, femoral intramedullary stem diameter, hip-knee-ankle angle (HKAA), mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), mechanical medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA), and so on were measured as well. Following that, statistical analysis was performed. Results: Patients in the loosening group had statistically significant differences in the ratio of prostheses length to femur length (71.89 ± 6.62) and the ratio of intramedullary stem diameter to femoral diameter (25.50 ± 6.90) (P < 0.05), when compared to the control group. The HKAA (175.58 ± 2.78), mLDFA (94.42 ± 2.57), and the deviation angle between the lower limb alignment and the tibial prostheses force line (2.23 ± 1.09) in the loosening group were significantly different from those in the control group (P < 0.05) on postoperative radiographs of the entire length of the lower limbs. The lowest score in intramedullary manubrium I indicated less osteolysis, while the highest score in intramedullary manubrium III indicated the most serious osteolysis, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Our study suggests that the use of longer and thicker intramedullary stems can effectively decrease the occurrence of aseptic loosening. Additionally, it is important to avoid using the original prostheses and reconstruct the standard line of lower limb force to further reduce the incidence of aseptic loosening. It is crucial to closely monitor the distal segment of the intramedullary stem for osteolysis after surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Tumor prostheses are associated with a high infection risk. The main pathogens involved in these infections include Staphylococcus spp., followed by Streptococcus spp. These pathogens usually form a biofilm that covers the implants, which is a matrix of extracellular polymeric substances containing sessile microbial cells connected to one another. Prompt diagnosis is challenging due to the highly varying clinical symptoms and the lack of specific preoperative and intraoperative diagnostic tests. However, the development of molecular biology techniques such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based methods and next-generation sequencing (NGS) over the past decade has improved the diagnostic accuracy for periprosthetic infections. Despite their high sensitivity, these methods have a high rate of false positive results. Surgical management with one- or two-stage revision surgery is mandatory for eradication of these infections. This study consolidates the current knowledge regarding the risk factors, microbiology, diagnosis, and treatment of infections of tumor prostheses. Several causes contribute to the high infection rate in tumor prostheses, including extensive tissue dissection and patients' immunosuppression due to the neoplastic disease. Most of these infections develop within the first 2 years following surgery with 70% of them occurring during the first year, while they are often associated with a low pathogen burden. The pathogenesis of infections in tumor prostheses is linked to bacteria developing in biofilms. Approximately half of them are caused by Staphylococcus spp., followed by Streptococcus spp., Enterococcus spp., and Enterobacteriaceae spp., while multiple pathogens may be isolated in up to 25% of the cases, with coagulase-negative Staphylococci (CoNS) and Enterococccus spp. being the most frequent pair. Although early detection and timely management are essential for complete resolution of these challenging infections, prompt diagnosis is problematic due to the highly varying clinical symptoms and the lack of specific preoperative and intraoperative diagnostic tests. Surgical management with one- or two-stage revision surgery is the mainstay for successful eradication of these infections. The recent advances in laboratory diagnostics and the development of biofilm-resistant prostheses over the past years have been areas of great interest, as research is now focused on prevention strategies. The aim of this study is to review and consolidate the current knowledge regarding the epidemiology, risk factors, microbiology, and diagnosis of infections of tumor prostheses, and to review the current concepts for their treatment and outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Limb salvage surgery (LSS) is the preferred method for treatment of patients with sarcomas and to a greater extent also to patients with metastatic bone disease. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the adaptive remodeling of the periprosthetic cortical bone after insertion of a tumor prosthesis with cemented stem. Methods A prospective study of 21 patients (F/M = 12/9), mean age 55 years (range 15–81) with metastatic bone disease (n = 9), sarcomas (n = 8) or aggressive benign tumors (n = 4) who underwent bone resection due to a tumor, and reconstruction with a tumor-prosthesis (Zimmer® Segmental 130 mm straight fluted cemented stem with trabecular metal (TM) collars) in the proximal femur (n = 10), distal femur (n = 9) or proximal tibia (n = 2). Measurements of bone mineral density (BMD) (g/cm2) were done postoperatively and after 3, 6, and 12 months using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. BMD was measured in 4 regions of interest around the cemented stem and in one region of interest 1 cm proximal from the ankle joint of the affected limb and measurement of the contralateral ankle was used as reference. Repeated measures ANOVA and students paired t-test was used to evaluate BMD changes over time. Results At 1-year follow-up, BMD decreased compared to baseline in all four regions of interest with a statistically significant bone loss of 8–15%. The bone loss was most pronounced (14–15%) in the 2 regions of interest closest to the trabecular metal (TM) collar and lowest (8%) adjacent to the tip of the stem. Conclusion After 1 year the decrease in bone mineral density of the ankle on the affected limb was 9% and the contralateral ankle was close to baseline, thus suggesting that the periprosthetic bone mineral density changes during follow-up, mainly are caused by stress shielding and immobilization. Trial registration The study was approved by the Scientific Ethical Committee of the Capital Region of Denmark (J. No. H-2-2014-105) and the Danish Data Protection Agency (J. No.: 2012–58-00004 ).

Several causes contribute to the high infection rate in tumor prostheses, including extensive tissue dissection and patients’ immunosuppression due to the neoplastic disease. Most of these infections develop within the first 2 years following surgery with 70% of them occurring during the first year, while they are often associated with a low pathogen burden. The pathogenesis of infections in tumor prostheses is linked to bacteria developing in biofilms. Approximately half of them are caused by Staphylococcus spp., followed by Streptococcus spp., Enterococcus spp., and Enterobacteriaceae spp., while multiple pathogens may be isolated in up to 25% of the cases, with coagulase-negative Staphylococci (CoNS) and Enterococccus spp. being the most frequent pair. Although early detection and timely management are essential for complete resolution of these challenging infections, prompt diagnosis is problematic due to the highly varying clinical symptoms and the lack of specific preoperative and intraoperative diagnostic tests. Surgical management with one- or two-stage revision surgery is the mainstay for successful eradication of these infections. The recent advances in laboratory diagnostics and the development of biofilm-resistant prostheses over the past years have been areas of great interest, as research is now focused on prevention strategies. The aim of this study is to review and consolidate the current knowledge regarding the epidemiology, risk factors, microbiology, and diagnosis of infections of tumor prostheses, and to review the current concepts for their treatment and outcomes.

Background: Limb salvage surgery (LSS) is the preferred method for treatment of patients with sarcomas and to a greater extent also to patients with metastatic bone disease. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the adaptive remodeling of the periprosthetic cortical bone after insertion of a tumor prosthesis with cemented stem.Methods: A prospective study of 21 patients (F/M = 12/9), mean age 55 years (range 15-81) with metastatic bone disease (n = 9), sarcomas (n = 8) or aggressive benign tumors (n = 4) who underwent bone resection due to a tumor, and reconstruction with a tumor-prosthesis (Zimmer® Segmental 130 mm straight fluted cemented stem with trabecular metal (TM) collars) in the proximal femur (n = 10), distal femur (n = 9) or proximal tibia (n = 2). Measurements of bone mineral density (BMD) (g/cm2) were done postoperatively and after 3, 6, and 12 months using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. BMD was measured in 4 regions of interest around the cemented stem and in one region of interest 1 cm proximal from the ankle joint of the affected limb and measurement of the contralateral ankle was used as reference. Repeated measures ANOVA and students paired t-test was used to evaluate BMD changes over time.Results: At 1-year follow-up, BMD decreased compared to baseline in all four regions of interest with a statistically significant bone loss of 8-15%. The bone loss was most pronounced (14-15%) in the 2 regions of interest closest to the trabecular metal (TM) collar and lowest (8%) adjacent to the tip of the stem.Conclusion: After 1 year the decrease in bone mineral density of the ankle on the affected limb was 9% and the contralateral ankle was close to baseline, thus suggesting that the periprosthetic bone mineral density changes during follow-up, mainly are caused by stress shielding and immobilization.Trial Registration: The study was approved by the Scientific Ethical Committee of the Capital Region of Denmark (J. No. H-2-2014-105) and the Danish Data Protection Agency (J. No.: 2012-58-00004 ). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Sarcomas of the extremities are rare entities, the treatment of which requires special expertise. Even if the treatment of patients is always interdisciplinary, the surgical R0 resection is the key point of each curatively intended treatment. In addition to resection in sano, the aim is to preserve the extremities and function, so that defect reconstruction after resection plays a decisive role. Due to the heterogeneity of tumors as well as their localization and extent, reconstruction is always an individually adapted treatment. Modular tumor endoprostheses are often used in this context, which can be constructed according to the size of the defect. The transplantation of autologous or allogeneic bone is also frequently used alone or as an additive procedure. Patient-specific (mega)prostheses are used particularly for pelvic tumors. Defect reconstruction using scaffold-based procedures from the field of tissue engineering is being tested as a promising procedure for the future. This article provides an overview of the treatment principles for sarcomas of the extremities and their individual reconstruction options., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.)

• Currently there are no accepted international guidelines for the correct placement of reconstruction prostheses in the axial plane. • The linea aspera is not a reliable landmark for the axial rotation of femoral implants. • The position of the linea aspera is highly dependent on the osteotomy height and differs between individual patients. • Preoperative assessment of the linea aspera is advocated in order to reduce the chance of malrotation. Currently there are no accepted international guidelines for the correct placement of reconstruction prostheses in the axial plane of the femur after en bloc resection. The most accepted method is based on the linea aspera as an intraoperative landmark, indicating posterior. This study was conducted to address the reliability of the linea aspera as a landmark for rotational alignment. 50 CT angiographies of the right limb were used for this purpose. These 2D images were reconstructed into 3D models using proprietary software (materialize NV, Leuven, Belgium). The posterior condylar line was used as a reference axis. The orientation of the linea aspera was described as the angle between the perpendicular line to the PCL, through the center of the diaphysis, and the lateral (α) and medial labium (β). The linear mixed model shows that the α- and β-angles are significantly associated with the distance from the joint line (p <0.001) and vary significantly between subjects (p <0.001). The α-angle has the lowest variance and approximates more closely true posterior, while the median β-angle never overlaps true posterior. When a surgeon would blindly rely on the linea aspera as a posterior landmark roughly 78% of the femoral implants would exceed the accepted ±3° deviation around the surgical transepicondylar axis (sTEA) as defined in total knee replacement. The linea aspera is not a reliable landmark for axial rotation of femoral implants. The position is highly dependent on the osteotomy height and in addition differs between individual patients. Preoperative assessment of the linea aspera is advocated in order to reduce the risk of malrotation. As the height of the osteotomy cannot always be determined correctly preoperatively, a table was designed as a guideline for how much a deviation from the planned resection height will affect the rotation of the implant. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Restoring femoral rotation alignment and limb length after distal femur resection and endoprosthetic reconstruction is crucial to avoid poor outcomes. This technical note presents a simple and reliable intraoperative technique for restoring femoral rotation and length during distal femur resection and endoprosthetic reconstruction without the need for extensive preoperative planning or complex perioperative modalities. The method utilizes an external fixator frame as a guiding device to assess and restore the native alignment. This approach provides a practical alternative to relying solely on the position of the linea aspera, which has been shown to be an unreliable landmark for rotational alignment. Implementing this technique can contribute to improved functional outcomes in patients undergoing distal femur endoprosthetic reconstruction., (© 2023 The Authors.)

Während vor etwa 3 Dekaden die Amputation als kurative Therapiestrategie regelhaft durchgeführt wurde, steht heute der Extremitätenerhalt im Fokus und führt in Kombination mit der adjuvanten Radiatio zu keiner höheren Rezidivrate.Ein Extremitätenerhalt wird nur dann empfohlen, wenn tumorfreie Ränder zu erreichen sind und der Extremitätenerhalt zu einer besseren Funktion führt als eine Amputation. Die Modularität ist das besondere Merkmal von Tumorendoprothesen und bildet die Basis für die weitgehende Flexibilität des Operateurs sowie die umfassenden Gelenk- und Knochenrekonstruktionsmöglichkeiten. Die Erfolge der Entwicklung von modularen Tumorprothesen müssen vor dem Hintergrund der Komplikationen und Revisionsraten diskutiert werden.In Studien zu Megaprothesen der unteren Extremität wurde über eine 10-jährige Standzeit von 77-100 % und über eine 10-Jahres-Fehlerrate von 22 % berichtet. Aufgrund der geringeren mechanischen Belastung sind die Ergebnisse an der oberen Extremität besser. Die Infektionsraten beim proximalen Humerusersatz sind gering. Demgegenüber stehen Infektionsraten von etwa 20-25 % beim proximalen oder distalen Femurersatz bzw. proximalen Tibiaersatz. Funktionelle Einschränkungen sind insbesondere an der unteren Extremität und dort speziell beim proximalen Tibiaersatz zu erwarten, während die Ergebnisse nach proximalem Femurersatz und an der oberen Extremität gut sind.Studien zur Lebensqualität nach Extremitätenerhalt durch Tumorprothesen sollten auch die Problematik der Komplikations- und Revisionsrate sowie funktionelle Aspekte berücksichtigen, um belastbarere Aussagen für die Entscheidung Amputation vs. Extremitätenerhalt im Einzelfall treffen zu können. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purposes:Bone tumours have been a tragedy for the patient in any time period. In the majority of the cases it occurs in children or young adults. In the past the affected limbs could not be spared and the overall prognosis was poor. Methods:Chemotherapy successfully introduced for the purpose of overcoming the poor overall prognosis (Rosen and Jaffe) and tumour prostheses were invented for the purpose of salvaging the affected limbs (Marcove, Scales, Campanacci, Sivas, Salzer). According to the Vienna Tumour Registry in 1968, the first custom-made Vitallium prosthesis for the proximal femur was implanted in a parosteal osteosarcoma. Results: In Vienna, as a result of the successful chemotherapy the surgical methods for bone tumours changed to limb sparing methods also . A modular ceramic prosthesis for the proximal humerus was introduced by Salzer. From 1975 -1982 16 custom-made endoprosthesis (1) for the knee region were implanted which were replaced by the KMFTR in 1982 (2, Kotz modular femur tibia reconstruction system) which was introduced at the “2nd ISOLS” to an international group of experts. The successful system was followed by the HMRS (Howmedica modular resection system) in 1988. At that time, especially in children, the rotation-plasty of Borgreve was adopted for tumours of the knee region (2). A scientific survey of 70 patients with rotation-plasty until 1991 showed excellent clinical and oncologic results. Later a similar approach was used in upper extremity tumours as “resection replantation” with surprisingly good results. Sophisticated technologies with growing mechanisms allowed the use of endoprostheses even in children (3) for the purpose of substitution since the mutilating rotation-plasty in 1996. Conclusion: For almost 100 years efforts have been undertaken to improve the treatment of bone tumours. Surgery was aiming to keep the function of the limbs by tumour resection instead of amputation. Together with successful chemotherapy, which saves lives, an adequate surgery could stepwise salvage the function of the limb. Body integrity was the final aim for the diseased. Finally, by the effort of the International Societies like ISOLS and EMSOS the survival of malignant bone tumour patients improved from 20% to 80 % with good function quality by sophisticated operative techniques and improved tumour prostheses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Among 40 patients with primary malignant tumors of the knee joint who underwent reconstruction of the affected limb with tumor prosthesis, revision was required in 7 due to stem breakage or loosening. Subjects and methods: In the 7 cases undergoing revision, conditions and background factors at the time of breakage, the breakage site, time of revision, models of previous and new prostheses, stem diameters before and after revision, details of the revision (blood loss, operative time), and the presence or absence of adjuvant therapy were determined. Results: The replacement site was the distal femur in 5 and proximal tibia in 2. Revision was performed 6 years and 2 months after the previous prosthesis placement on average. The broken prosthesis model was KMFTR in 4 and HMRS and the physio-hinge type in one each. Revision due to loosening was performed in a case requiring replacement with Growing Kotz prosthesis. The model was switched to HMRS in 3, and the stem diameter was changed to 12 mm in 3 KMFTR breakage cases. The mean stem diameters were 11.2 and 10.2 mm in the non-revision and revision groups. The respective resection rates were 36 and 45%. The mean functional evaluation was 70.1% before and 76.2% after revision. Conclusion: To reduce the risk of tumor prosthesis breakage, the amount of bone resection should be limited to 30% or less in the affected bone, the stem diameter should be at least 12 mm, and the stem shape should be fitted to the anatomical shape of the femur. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Malignant bone and soft tissue tumors are usually surgically removed with an envelope of healthy tissue as a barrier. If located in the long bones of the upper and lower extremity, this approach leads to a large bone defect commonly affecting a joint. One way to rebuild the bone defect and the neighboring joint is the use of a megaprosthesis that is anchored in the remaining bone comparable to a conventional joint replacement. In general this approach is popular as it provides early stability and allows the affected patient to begin rehabilitation early on. However, complications leading to long-term unplanned reoperation are common. This article provides an overview of current implant survival, types of complication and long-term outcomes of megaprostheses used following tumor resection. Megaprosthetic reconstruction of segmental bone defects following sarcoma resection is a frequently chosen surgical approach in orthopedic oncology. While the use of megaprostheses has gained popularity over the last decades and such implants are increasingly used for metastatic reconstructions and in non-tumor cases, there still is a high risk of long-term complications leading to revision surgery. This article investigates current implant survivorship, frequency and types of complications as well as functional outcomes of upper and lower limb megaprosthetic reconstructions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]