Search

This research focuses on answering the question of how Metro TV and TVOne implemented peaceful journalism in the Kanjuruhan Stadium tragedy in October 2022. The incident, which killed 135 people and injured 583 people, then developed as a conflict between the police, match organizers, and football supporters, especially Aremania. In the news, conflict issues are always an exciting topic to discuss. Events that contain conflict naturally attract people and have more sales potential than mediocre events. Therefore, researchers are interested in examining how conflict is framed by the media, especially TV, from a Peace Journalism perspective. Using Descriptive Qualitative Research Methods with framing analysis Robert N. Entman 1) Define Problem, 2) Diagnose Causes, 3) Make a Moral Judgment (moral decision maker), 4) Treatment Recommendation (Problem-Solving) and the concept of peace journalism, namely orientation to truth, society, peace, and problem-solving. The results of this research indicate that from the four framing analysis units and the concept of peace journalism, it can be seen that TVOne has implemented three of the four fundamental concepts of peace journalism, namely oriented toward peace, society, and conflict resolution efforts. This is marked by highlighting issues that focus on victims and losses of conflict and providing space to talk to each figure in the conflict. Meanwhile, Metro TV, of the four components of peaceful journalism analysis, only 1 focuses on efforts to implement peaceful journalism, namely problem solving. Metro TV focuses more on efforts to find the cause of the conflict and resolve the conflict by blaming one particular party but does not focus on the deep sorrow of the victims.

his study aims to describe the differences in human rights news reporting in the iNews Pagi, Kabar Utama tvOne, and Tribunnews Update programs. This study used a qualitative descriptive method with the help of Norman Fairclough's theory of critical discourse analysis, especially the analysis of textual representation. The data were in the form of the transcription of the news "Moeldoko Diusir Massa" in Kabar Utama tvOne, "Moeldoko Diusir Aktivis HAM" in iNews Pagi, and “Detik-Detik Moeldoko Kena Skakmat & Diusir” in Tribunnews Update at the period of 18-19 November 2021. The data were collected by listening and note-taking techniques. Based on the results of the analysis, Kabar Utama tvOne and Tribunnews Update programs used the words diusir, penolakan and ditolak . The grammar used showed the situation. Besides, the intra-sentence conjunctions used yang and dan as explanations and additions in sentences, and namun as a conjunction between sentences. Meanwhile, in iNews Pagi reporting, the dominant clause used active transitive sentences with menolak and mengusir. Then, the coherence between one clause and another had a foreground relationship that supports each other. The similarity of the data was the series of clauses and clause combinations, while the difference was in the clauses.

Ahmad Dhani telibat dalam kasus ujaran kebencian dan akhirnya divonis bersalah atas cuitannya di Twitter. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui bagaimana TvOne membingkai berita kasus ujaran kebencian yang dilakukan oleh Ahmad Dhani. Model framing yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah model framing milik Robert N. Entman yang berfokus pada pemilihan isu dan penonjolan aspek dari suatu berita. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan menggunakan tiga berita TvOne pada periode November 2017 sampai Februari 2019 sebagai unit analisisnya, yang dianalisa dengan melihat teks, durasi dan scene. Berdasarkan element framing Entman yaitu Define Problem, Diagnose Cause, Moral Judgement, dan Treatment Recommendation, hasil penelitian menunjukkan tiga hal dalam pemberitaan tersebut, yaitu ketidakberimbangan narasumber, pengulangan narasi Ahmad Dhani tidak bersalah, dan kontroversi UU ITE di Indonesia. Ahmad Dhani was involved in the case of hate speech and was ultimately convicted of his post on Twitter. This study aims to find out how TvOne framed the case of hate speech committed by Ahmad Dhani. The framing model used in this study is Robert N. Entman's framing model, focusing on the selection of issues and highlighting aspects of a story. This study used a qualitative method using three TvOne clips from November 2017 until February 2019 as the unit of analysis, analyzed by looking at the text, duration and scene. Based on Entman's framing elements such as Define Problem, Diagnosis Cause, Moral Judgment, and Treatment Recommendation, the results of the study identified three frames in the news, including the imbalance of the sources, the narrative of Ahmad Dhani's innocence, and the controversy over the ITE Law in Indonesia.