Search

Background: Techniques in endovascular therapy have evolved to offer a promising alternative to medical therapy alone for Type B aortic dissections (TBADs). Aim: The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare mortality and overall complications between thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) and best medical therapy (BMT) in patients with TBADs. Methods: We included randomized control trials and prospective or retrospective cohort studies that compared TEVAR and BMT for the treatment of type B aortic dissection. Multiple electronic databases were searched. Results: Thirty-two cohort studies including 150,836 patients were included. TEVAR was associated with a significantly lower 30-day mortality rate than BMT (RR = 0.79, CI = 0.63, 0.99, P = 0.04), notably in patients ≥ 65 years of age (RR = 0.78, CI = 0.64, 0.95, P = 0.01). The TEVAR group had a significantly prolonged hospital stay (MD = 3.42, CI = 1.69, 5.13, P = 0.0001) and ICU stay (MD = 3.18, CI = 1.48, 4.89, P = 0.0003) compared to the BMT. BMT was associated with increased stroke risk (RR = 1.52, CI = 1.29, 1.79, P < 0.00001). No statistically significant differences in late mortality (1, 3, and 5 years) or intervention-related factors (acute renal failure, spinal cord ischemia, myocardial infarction, respiratory failure, and sepsis) were noted between the groups. Conclusion: Our meta-analysis revealed a significant association between the TEVAR group and a decreased mortality rate of TBAD compared to the medical treatment group, especially in patients aged 65 years or older. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm our findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Non-A non-B aortic dissection (AD) is a rare and life-threatening medical emergency, and it has been controversial whether it should be managed as type B aortic dissection (TBAD). The study aims to compare in-hospital and follow-up outcomes between patients with non-A non-B AD and those with TBAD treated by endovascular based treatment (EBT). Methods: From January 2017 to December 2021, 96 consecutive patients with non-A non-B AD met the inclusion criteria and underwent EBT. Patients with TBAD were matched to patients with non-A non-B AD at a 1:1 ratio using propensity score matching analysis to correct for baseline confounding factors. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. Aortic-related events were defined as dissection-related death, aortic rupture, retrograde type A aortic dissection, reintervention, and type Ia endoleak. Results: Patients with non-A non-B AD required more TEVAR-related adjunctive procedures compared to TBAD patients during EBT and they required a longer ICU length of stay (36.0 vs 24.0 hours, P <.05) as well as a longer hospitalization (8.0 vs 7.0 days, P <.05) after EBT. There was no statistical difference in overall survival after EBT for patients with TBAD and non-A non-B AD. However, compared to patients with TBAD, non-A non-B AD patients had a higher rate of reintervention and experienced more aortic-related late events during follow-up. Conclusion: Patients with non-A non-B acute AD who are treated with EBT do not have higher in-hospital or follow-up mortality rates compared to patients with type B AD. However, there is an increased risk of reintervention and aortic-related late events after the intervention during follow-up. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair (TEVAR) is widely used for the treatment of aortic dissection. Endograft oversizing is a risk factor for stent graft-induced new entry tears and retrograde type A aortic dissection. However, there is no clear consensus on the optimal graft size selection for Stanford type B acute or subacute aortic dissection (TBAD). Herein, we examined the safety and efficacy of TEVAR using an intentionally undersized endograft to treat TBAD. This retrospective chart review study included 82 patients who underwent TEVAR for acute or subacute Stanford TBAD between 2015 and 2022. We measured the true lumen diameter just distal to the subclavian artery and opted for a stent graft of the same diameter. In instances where deformation resulting from false lumen pressure displacement was pronounced, we measured the diameter at the site just proximal to the subclavian artery. Patients' characteristics, procedural, in-hospital, and follow-up data, and aortic remodeling were analyzed. The aortic diameter was analyzed using one-way analysis of variance followed by Dunnett's test. Survival and freedom from reintervention were estimated using Kaplan-Meier curves. The follow-up rate was 98.4%. The mean age was 58.3 ± 12.3 years, and 76 were men (92.7%). The mean diameters of the stent graft and native proximal landing zone were 30.9 ± 3.2 mm and 30.8 ± 3.0 mm, respectively. The oversize rate of the stent graft in relation to the native proximal aortic diameter was 0.3% ± 4.7%. In-hospital mortality was observed in one patient, retrograde type A aortic dissection in one patient, distal stent graft-induced new entry tear in zero patients, and type 1a endoleak in 22 patients (26.8%). Type 1a endoleaks, characterized by antegrade false lumen blood flow originating from the primary entry, in 12 patients spontaneously disappeared within 1 year of follow-up. According to aortic remodeling, 59 patients (86.8%) achieved complete aortic remodeling at the aortic arch level and 51 (75.0%) at the eighth thoracic vertebral level. The diameters of the aortic arch and descending aorta were significantly reduced compared with the postoperative measurements (P <.001). Survival rates were 97.5% and 93.6% at 1 and 3 years, respectively. Freedom from reintervention was 84.7% and 84.7% at 1 and 3 years, respectively. Intentionally undersized TEVAR was safe and achieved acceptable aortic remodeling despite a high rate of type 1a endoleaks. A type 1a endoleak was acceptable as it primarily diminished during the mid-term follow-up. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Retrograde type A aortic dissection (RTAD) represents a serious complication of endovascular treatment for type B aortic dissection (TBAD). To avoid RTAD, it is recommended to land the proximal end of the stent graft in a non-dissected aortic segment. In this study, we investigated whether landing in the dissection area increased the number of events at the proximal site. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of endovascular treatments for TBAD at a single institution between 2009 and 2022. Patients were divided into two groups: group A, with a proximal landing zone entirely within the dissected area, and group B, with the proximal extent of the seal zone in the non-dissected area. We evaluated the occurrence of proximal events, including RTAD, and examined long-term outcomes to assess the validity of landing in the dissection area. Results: The study included eighty-nine patients who underwent endovascular treatment for TBAD. New intimal tears in the proximal landing site occurred in 3 cases (3.4%), with 1 case (2%) in group A and 2 cases (5.1%) in group B, showing no significant difference. Among the three cases, one (1.1%) in group B with zone 2 landing resulted in RTAD. At 60 months, the overall survival was 85%, and freedom from aorta-related mortality was 88%, with no significant difference between the groups. Conclusion: Even if the proximal landing is in a dissected area, a treatment strategy performed in zone 3 without proximal landing in zone 2, seeking a non-dissected area, can still provide sufficient therapeutic effects. Level of Evidence 3 Retrospective single-center cohort analysis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study aimed to establish a predictive model for the risk of post-thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) post-implantation syndrome (PIS) in type B aortic dissection (TBAD) patients, assisting clinical physicians in early risk stratification and decision management for high-risk PIS patients. This study retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 547 consecutive TBAD patients who underwent TEVAR treatment at our hospital. Feature variables were selected through LASSO regression and logistic regression analysis to construct a nomogram predictive model, and the model's performance was evaluated. The optimal cutoff value for the PIS risk nomogram score was calculated through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, further dividing patients into high-risk group (HRG) and low-risk group (LRG), and comparing the short to midterm postoperative outcomes between the two groups. In the end, a total of 158 cases (28.9%) experienced PIS. Through LASSO regression analysis and multivariable logistic regression analysis, variables including age, emergency surgery, operative time, contrast medium volume, and number of main prosthesis stents were selected to construct the nomogram predictive model. The model achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.86 in the training set and 0.82 in the test set. Results from calibration curve, decision curve analysis (DCA) and clinical impact curve (CIC) demonstrated that the predictive model exhibited good performance and clinical utility. Furthermore, after comparing the postoperative outcomes of HRG and LRG patients, we found that the incidence of postoperative PIS significantly increased in HRG patients. The duration of ICU stay and mechanical assistance time was prolonged, and the incidence of postoperative type II entry flow and acute kidney injury (AKI) was higher. The risk of aortic-related adverse events (ARAEs) and major adverse events (MAEs) at the first and twelfth months of follow-up also significantly increased. However, there was no significant difference in the mortality rate during hospitalization. This study established a nomogram model for predicting the risk of PIS in patients with TBAD undergoing TEVAR. It serves as a practical tool to assist clinicians in early risk stratification and decision-making management for patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective Design Setting Population Methods Main Outcome Measures Results Conclusions Pregnancy complicated with type B aortic dissection is a rare but devastating condition. Guidelines for managing this condition are lacking. We present our observation and experiences in managing five pregnant women with complicated type B aortic dissection in the second or third trimesters, aiming to gain insights that can aid in proposing an appropriate management strategy.A retrospective study.Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University.Pregnant women with complicated type B aortic dissection.Clinical data of five pregnant women with complicated type B aortic dissection admitted to Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University from January 2022 to June 2023 were collected. The clinical characteristics, treatment strategies, and corresponding maternal and infant outcomes were retrospectively analysed.Survival of mothers and foetuses.All five study participants were diagnosed with complicated type B aortic dissection by computed tomography angiography (CTA). The range of gestational weeks at admission was 27 weeks + 3 days to 36 weeks + 6 days. The first patient, planning a caesarean section (C‐section) followed by thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), died of aortic dissection rupture during C‐section. Her neonate was successfully rescued. In contrast, the remaining four patients who underwent TEVAR first survived. Among them, three patients underwent single‐stage aortic repair and delivery, while one patient received C‐section 31 days after TEVAR. Three preterm live births were recorded among these surviving mothers. Neonatal death occurred in one case with a gestational age of 29 weeks + 5 days, who had foetal distress before surgery. During the follow‐up period of up to 3 months, no maternal or infant death occurred. No device‐related or systemic complications were observed in the surviving mothers after discharge. Routine physical examinations of the four live births showed no abnormalities.For pregnant women with thoracic back pain and high suspicion of aortic dissection, CTA should be conducted promptly to prevent missed or delayed diagnosis. Maternal survival should be prioritised over foetal outcome once diagnosed. TEVAR was demonstrated to be safe and feasible for such patients. For women with complicated type B aortic dissection in late pregnancy, TEVAR followed by C‐section may be a promising treatment strategy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Malnutrition is a poor prognostic factor in a wide range of diseases. Nevertheless, there is a lack of data investigating the association between malnutrition and outcomes of patients with type B aortic dissection (TBAD) undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). Therefore, the aim of the present study was to report the prevalence and clinical impact of malnutrition assessed by the controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score in TBAD patients undergoing TEVAR. Methods: The retrospective study indicated that a total of 881 patients diagnosed with TBAD and treated with TEVAR from January 2010 to December 2017 were categorized into subgroups based on their CONUT score (low ≤5 vs. high >5). To assess the correlation between malnutrition and early and follow-up outcomes of TBAD patients, logistic and Cox regression analysis were utilized, incorporating inverse probability weighting. Results: Malnutrition was present in 20.3% of patients according to the CONUT score. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that pre-operative CONUT score modeled as a continuous variable was an independent risk factor for prolonged intensive care unit stay (odds ratio [OR], 1.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02–1.17; p = 0.015), 30-day death (OR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.19–1.72; p < 0.001), delirium (OR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.01–1.23; p = 0.035) and acute kidney injury (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.01–1.16; p = 0.027). During a median follow-up of 70.8 (46.1–90.8) months, 102 (11.8%) patients died (high CONUT group: 21.8% vs. low CONUT group: 9.0%; p < 0.001). Multivariable Cox proportional-hazards models showed that malnutrition was an independent predictor for follow-up mortality (hazard ratio, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.11–2.53; p = 0.014). Results remained consistent across various sensitivity analyses. Conclusions: Malnutrition assessed by the CONUT score could profoundly affect the early and follow-up prognosis in patients undergoing TEVAR. Routine preintervention nutritional evaluation might provide valuable prognostic information. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Techniques in endovascular therapy have evolved to offer a promising alternative to medical therapy alone for Type B aortic dissections (TBADs). Aim The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare mortality and overall complications between thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) and best medical therapy (BMT) in patients with TBADs. Methods We included randomized control trials and prospective or retrospective cohort studies that compared TEVAR and BMT for the treatment of type B aortic dissection. Multiple electronic databases were searched. Results Thirty-two cohort studies including 150,836 patients were included. TEVAR was associated with a significantly lower 30-day mortality rate than BMT (RR = 0.79, CI = 0.63, 0.99, P = 0.04), notably in patients ≥ 65 years of age (RR = 0.78, CI = 0.64, 0.95, P = 0.01). The TEVAR group had a significantly prolonged hospital stay (MD = 3.42, CI = 1.69, 5.13, P = 0.0001) and ICU stay (MD = 3.18, CI = 1.48, 4.89, P = 0.0003) compared to the BMT. BMT was associated with increased stroke risk (RR = 1.52, CI = 1.29, 1.79, P

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of surgical strategies for communicating DeBakey IIIb chronic dissecting aortic aneurysm, considering the optimal primary surgical repair to prevent aortic events. Methods: From 2002 to 2021, 101 patients with communicating DeBakey IIIb chronic dissecting aortic aneurysm who underwent surgical repair were categorized based on the primary surgical repair: 1-stage repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAAR) (n = 22) or staged repair, such as descending thoracic aneurysm repair (DTAR) (n = 43) or total arch replacement with elephant trunk implantation (TARET) (n = 25), and thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) (n = 11). Early and late postoperative outcomes were compared among the groups. Results: Early outcomes for TAAAR, DTAR, TARET, and TEVAR were associated with the incidence of stroke (9.1% vs 0% vs 4.0% vs 9.1%, respectively), spinal cord injury (13.6% vs 4.7% vs 8.0% vs 0%, respectively), and in-hospital mortality (9.1% vs 2.3% vs 0% vs 9.1%, respectively). During follow-up, the 10-year overall survival and 7-year aortic event-free rates for TAAAR, DTAR, TARET, and TEVAR were 61.8%, 71.6%, 21.5%, and 26.5% and 93.8%, 84.3%, 74.4%, and 51.4%, respectively. TAAAR had significantly higher overall survival (P = .05) and aortic event-free rates (P = .03) than TEVAR. TARET (hazard ratio, 2.27; P

Abstract This study aimed to establish a predictive model for the risk of post-thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) post-implantation syndrome (PIS) in type B aortic dissection (TBAD) patients, assisting clinical physicians in early risk stratification and decision management for high-risk PIS patients. This study retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 547 consecutive TBAD patients who underwent TEVAR treatment at our hospital. Feature variables were selected through LASSO regression and logistic regression analysis to construct a nomogram predictive model, and the model's performance was evaluated. The optimal cutoff value for the PIS risk nomogram score was calculated through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, further dividing patients into high-risk group (HRG) and low-risk group (LRG), and comparing the short to midterm postoperative outcomes between the two groups. In the end, a total of 158 cases (28.9%) experienced PIS. Through LASSO regression analysis and multivariable logistic regression analysis, variables including age, emergency surgery, operative time, contrast medium volume, and number of main prosthesis stents were selected to construct the nomogram predictive model. The model achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.86 in the training set and 0.82 in the test set. Results from calibration curve, decision curve analysis (DCA) and clinical impact curve (CIC) demonstrated that the predictive model exhibited good performance and clinical utility. Furthermore, after comparing the postoperative outcomes of HRG and LRG patients, we found that the incidence of postoperative PIS significantly increased in HRG patients. The duration of ICU stay and mechanical assistance time was prolonged, and the incidence of postoperative type II entry flow and acute kidney injury (AKI) was higher. The risk of aortic-related adverse events (ARAEs) and major adverse events (MAEs) at the first and twelfth months of follow-up also significantly increased. However, there was no significant difference in the mortality rate during hospitalization. This study established a nomogram model for predicting the risk of PIS in patients with TBAD undergoing TEVAR. It serves as a practical tool to assist clinicians in early risk stratification and decision-making management for patients.

Abstract The potential of adverse events (AEs) after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in patients with type B aortic dissection (TBAD) has been reported. To avoid the occurrence of AEs, it is important to recognize high-risk population for prevention in advance. The data of 261 patients with TBAD who received TEVAR between June 2017 and June 2021 at our medical center were retrospectively reviewed. After the implementation of exclusion criteria, 172 patients were finally included, and after 2.8 years (range from 1 day to 5.8 years) of follow up, they were divided into AEs (n = 41) and non-AEs (n = 131) groups. We identified the predictors of AEs, and a prediction model was constructed to calculate the specific risk of postoperative AEs at 1, 2, and 3 years, and to stratify patients into high-risk (n = 78) and low-risk (n = 94) group. The prediction model included seven predictors: Age > 75 years, Lower extremity malperfusion (LEM), NT-proBNP > 330 pg/ml, None distal tear, the ratio between the diameter of the ascending aorta and descending aorta (A/D ratio) > 1.2, the ratio of the area of the false lumen to the total aorta (FL ratio) > 64%, and acute TEVAR, which exhibited excellent predictive accuracy performance and discriminatory ability with C statistic of 82.3% (95% CI 77.3–89.2%). The prediction model was contributed to identify high-risk patients of postoperative AEs, which may serve to achievement of personalized treatment and follow-up plans for patients.

Aortic dissection is a catastrophic, life-threatening event. Its management depends on the anatomic location of the intimal tear (type A v B) and the clinical presentation in type B aortic dissection. In this article, the current evidence supporting clinical practice, gaps in knowledge, and the need for more rigorous research and higher-quality studies are reviewed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: This study aims to investigate the incidence and in-hospital outcomes of surgical repair for type B aortic dissection (TBAD) in Australia. Methods: Data were obtained from the Australasian Vascular Audit (AVA) and the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). The former is a total practice audit mandated for all members of the Australian and New Zealand Society for Vascular Surgery (ANZSVS) while the latter is an independent government agency which records all healthcare data in Australia. All cases of TBAD which underwent surgical intervention (endovascular or open repair) between 2010 and 2019 were identified using prospectively recorded data from the AVA (New Zealand data was excluded). The primary outcomes were temporal trends in procedures and hospital mortality; secondary outcomes were complications and risk factors for mortality. All admissions and procedures for, and hospital deaths from, TBAD in Australia were identified in AIHW datasets using the relevant diagnosis and procedure codes, with age-standardized rates calculated for the period 2000–01 to 2018–19. Results: A total of 567 cases of TBAD underwent vascular surgical intervention (AVA data, Australia). Of these, 96.3% were treated by endovascular repair. There was an increase in the annual procedure number from 45 in 2010 to 88 in 2019. In-hospital mortality was 4.8% for endovascular repair and 19% for open repair (p = 0.021). From 2000-01 to 2018-19, the age-standardized procedure rates for TBAD (Australia) doubled, the proportion of admitted patients undergoing a procedure rose from 28% to 43%, and in-hospital deaths fell by 25%. Conclusion: There has been an increasing incidence of vascular surgical intervention for TBAD in Australia. The majority of patients received endovascular therapy while the mortality from surgically managed TBAD appears to be falling. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Weekend effect characterized by worse perioperative outcomes has been demonstrated in some surgery patients admitted on weekends, as opposed to weekdays. This study aimed to examine weekend effect on open surgical repair or thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair (TEVAR) for Stanford Type B Aortic Dissection (TBAD). Methods: Patients who underwent TBAD repair were identified in National/Nationwisde Inpatient Sample from Q4 2015-2020. Open surgery and TEVAR were examined separately. Multivariable analyses were performed comparing in-hospital perioperative outcomes of patients under weekday and weekend admission. Adjusted preoperative variables included sex, age, race, socioeconomic status, hospital characteristics, clinical symptoms, comorbidities, and elective/non-elective admission. Also, length of stay, days from admission to operation, and total hospital charge were compared. Results: Among patients who underwent open TBAD repair, 1321 were admitted on weekdays and 340 on weekends. Among patients who underwent TEVAR for TBAD, 2018 were admitted on weekdays and 440 wereadmitted on weekends. There was no difference in open repair outcomes between those admitted on weekdays vs weekends. In TEVAR, weekend admission was associated with higher post-procedural kidney failure (1.14% vs.20%, aOR = 4.11, P =.04) and superficial wound complications (2.73% vs 1.49%, aOR = 2.2, P =.03) but lower respiratory complications (5.80% vs 3.64%, aOR =.47, P =.01). Also, in TEVAR, weekend admission was associated with longer time from admission to operation (3.92 ±.27 vs 2.35 ±.09 days, P <.01). Conclusions: Renal malperfusion was a common indication for TBAD repair. TBAD patients admitted over the weekend and underwent TEVAR had higher post-procedural kidney failure, which may be due to delayed diagnosis and treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The study aimed to investigate the mechanical factors for distal stent graft‐induced new entry (dSINE) in aortic dissection patients and discussed these factors in conjunction with aortic morphology. Two patients (one dSINE and one non‐dSINE), with the same age, gender, and type of implanted stent, were selected, then aortic morphological parameters were calculated. In addition, the stent material parameters used by the patients were also fitted. Simulations were performed based on the patient's aortic model and the stent graft used. The true lumen segment at the distal stent graft was designated as the "dSINE risk zone," and mechanical parameters (maximum principal strain, maximum principal stress) were computed. When approaching the area with higher mechanical parameters in the dSINE risk zone, dSINE patient exhibited higher values and growth rates in mechanical parameters compared to non‐dSINE patient. Furthermore, dSINE patient also presented larger aortic taper ratio, stent oversizing ratio, and expansion mismatch ratio of the distal true lumen (EMRDTR). The larger mechanical parameters and growth rates in dSINE patient corresponded to a greater aortic taper ratio, stent oversizing ratio, and EMRDTR. The failure of dSINE prediction by the stent tortuosity index indicated that mechanical parameters were the fundamental reasons for dSINE development. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Right-side aortic arch concomitant with Kommerell’s diverticulum (KD) is a rare and complex ailment, and there is no consensus on the optimal strategy to deal with this congenital anomaly. We retrospectively analyzed and summary of the cases treated in our center with individual treatment methods for different situations. Methods Between September 2018 and December 2021, 10 patients experienced surgical therapy at our institution who presented with a Kommerell’s diverticulum arising from an aberrant subclavian artery from the right-side aortic arch. Four main surgical techniques were applied to those patients: 1. total arch replacement with frozen elephant trunk implantation (n = 2); 2. hybrid procedure combining open arch repair and endovascular intervention (n = 1); 3. total endovascular repair using thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) with or without left subclavian artery (LSCA) revascularization (n = 6); 4. direct repair underwent endoaneurysmorrhaphy. Clinical characteristics and outcomes were collected. Results The mean age of these 10 patients was 56.5 years (range 29–79 years) and only 1 woman. The pathology includes aortic dissection (n = 6) and aneurysm (n = 4). The mean diverticulum size was 41.4 [24.2–56.8] mm. There were no in-hospital deaths, and the median hospital stay was 22 [15–43] days. During the follow-up period (21.4 months, 1–44 months), one died of an unknown cause and one died of esophageal fistula. Two patients underwent second-stage endovascular intervention for distal lesion. And none of the patients had endoleak during the follow-up period. Conclusions Each of the procedures we have mentioned here has its advantages and disadvantages; individualized treatment should meet the appropriate indications. A single-branched stent graft is feasible and effective in the treatment of aortic disease combined with Kommerell’s diverticulum.

Abstract Background Optimal medical therapy (OMT) for uncomplicated type B aortic dissection (uTBAD) provides excellent short-term outcomes during follow up; however, its long-term therapeutic effectiveness is unsatisfactory. This study evaluated the predictive value of systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) for adverse events among patients with acute uTBAD undergoing OMT. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database between 2013 and 2020. The primary end point in this study was composite outcomes including aortic intervention, all-cause mortality, retrograde type A aortic dissection (rTAAD) and aortic diameter growth > 5 mm. The patients were divided into high and low SII groups according to the optimal cut-off value of SII as determined using the receiver operating characteristic curve. Cox proportional hazards models were constructed to estimate the hazards ratios and identify the predictors of composite outcomes. Results A total of 124 patients with acute uTBAD who underwent OMT were enrolled. One patient died during hospitalisation. At the end of a mean follow-up duration of 51 ± 23 months, 53 (43.1%) patients experienced composite outcomes, 15 patients (12.2%) died, 31 (25.2%) underwent aortic intervention, 21 (17.1%) exhibited diameter growth of > 5 mm, and 2 developed rTAAD. The patients were divided into low SII group (n = 78, 62.9%) and high SII group (n = 46, 37.1%) as per the optimal cut-off SII value of 1449. The incidence of composite outcomes in high SII group was significantly higher than that in low SII (28 [60.9%] vs. 26[33.3%], p 1449 at the time of diagnosis is an independent predictor of OMT failure.

Abstract To evaluate the midterm efficacy of the Castor stent (CS) versus in situ fenestration (ISF) for reconstructing the left subclavian artery (LSA) in patients with type B aortic dissection (TBAD). Between July 2017 and July 2022, a total of 247 patients with TBAD were enrolled. One hundred thirty‐seven patients were treated using CSs (group A), while the remaining 110 patients received ISFs (group B). Data of the two groups were retrospectively analyzed. The success rates of surgery were 99.3% and 95.5% in groups A and B (p = .053), There were no deaths during hospitalization. During surgery, group B showed a longer surgical duration [68.0 (66.0, 77.0) vs. 62.0 (59.0, 66.0) min, p

This article presents a straightforward hybrid arch technique for treating residual type B aortic dissecting aneurysms following type A repair (replacement of the ascending aorta) that employs a frozen elephant trunk (FET) straight vascular prosthesis. The debranch-first method involves only cutting and sewing the previous ascending graft, inserting the FET from zone 0, and debranching the arch vessels using a trifurcated graft. This technique is less invasive as it eliminates the need to manipulate the dissected distal arch aneurysm. We successfully applied this technique to 3 patients, with no instances of in-hospital death, stroke, or paraplegia. The debranch-first technique, combined with zone-0 FET insertion, simplifies the redo repair of residual type B aortic dissection.

Background: Thoracoabdominal aneurysms and aortic dissections are a challenge for vascular surgeons. Open surgery, fenestrated or branched endograft, and the chimney technique are not possible in some patients, because of comorbidities or anatomical restrictions. However, the multilayer flow modulator (MFM) can be implanted in some of these patients. In this systematic review, we will describe the experience with the multilayer stent. To augment the limited number of studies available, we will include a cohort of patients from our hospital. Methods: We retrieved data on all consecutive patients treated using the MFM between May 2013 and August 2020. This included patients with type B dissections and thoracoabdominal or thoracic aneurysms who were unfit for open surgery. The systematic review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We included all the studies that used the MFM in the aortic segment. Single-arm meta-analyses were performed using OpenMeta (Brown University, Providence, RI, USA). Results: A total of 37 patients were treated in our hospital during the study period. The technical success was 97.3% and the 30-day mortality was 5.4%. In 40.5% of the included patients, the instructions for use were not followed. Offlabel implantation was associated with a higher aneurysm-related mortality. A total of 12 studies were included in the meta-analysis and the technical success was 97.8%. In 68.5%, the aneurysm sack or false lumen remained perfused, 97% of all the covered side branches remained patent. After a follow-up period of 1 year, five patients in the meta-analysis presented with a ruptured aneurysm. Conclusions: The overall quality of evidence is poor because long-term results are lacking, patients are frequently lost during follow-up and all the studies were non-comparative. Our retrospective study suggests a relatively low incidence of perioperative complications, although there was a high incidence of persistent perfusion in the aneurysm sac (102 of 149 patients). The risk of rupture at the 1-year follow-up was 2.1%. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

An aberrant right subclavian artery is a rare aortic arch anomaly where the right subclavian artery arises from the proximal part of the descending thoracic aorta and distal to origin of left subclavian artery. It usually courses behind the esophagus. Type B aortic dissection along with aberrant right subclavian artery is not common. A middle-aged man presented with complaints of epigastric pain and on evaluation was found to have aberrant right subclavian artery with type B aortic dissection. A total arch replacement with frozen elephant trunk surgery and an extra-anatomic bypass of right subclavian artery were performed. Type B aortic dissection is more often an incidental finding and its association with aberrant right subclavian artery is unusual. Such association should be identified and treated accordingly to avert clinical complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: An aberrant right subclavian artery (ARSA) is the most common congenital variant of the aortic arch and occurs in 0.5–1.8% of the population. Most patients with ARSA remain asymptomatic; however, symptoms associated with ARSA include dysphagia, esophageal compression, and airway obstruction. Surgical intervention is indicated if the ARSA becomes symptomatic or is related to aneurysmal dilatation. Even without symptoms, it carries the risk of rupture or dissection, and aggressive surgical therapy is recommended. The coexistence of type B dissection and ARSA is relatively rare, and the cause of this anomaly is unclear; however, some authors have reported that the acute angle of the ARSA weakens the aortic wall, inducing aortic dissection. Several surgical methods, such as thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), the frozen elephant trunk method, and open surgery, have been used to manage this lesion. Reconstruction of ARSA is challenging in any surgical procedure. Case presentation: We present an uncommon case of coexistent type B aortic dissection and aberrant right subclavian artery (ARSA) in a 72-year-old man. Left anterolateral thoracotomy was chosen to treat the enlarged descending thoracic aortic aneurysm in this case; in situ reconstruction was difficult because the dissection involved the ARSA. Hence, preoperatively, a right common carotid artery (RCCA)-to-ARSA bypass was performed via the right supraclavicular approach, followed by thoracic descending aortic artery reconstruction. The prior RCCA-to-ARSA bypass allowed ligation of the central side of the ARSA, thereby securing a bloodless field in the distal anastomosis. Conclusion: This lesion can be successfully repaired by open surgery with a two-stage approach: right common carotid artery-to-ARSA bypass followed by thoracic aortic replacement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Optimal Medical Therapy (OMT) has been the accepted mode of treatment for uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection (uTBAD). There is growing evidence that despite the short-term benefits of OMT, patients suffer deleterious consequences in the long-term with OMT alone. Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair (TEVAR) along with OMT has emerged as an alternative option for patients with uTBAD. This study evaluates the available literature for TEVAR + OMT as an alternative to OMT for treatment of uTBAD. In addition, issues related to TEVAR as a treatment for uTBAD are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Stanford type B aortic dissection (TB‐AD) is a life‐threatening vascular condition with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Currently, thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is widely performed to treat TB‐AD, and some studies have analyzed the influence of stents on hemodynamics using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models. However, the accuracy of TB‐AD simulation models are not satisfactory, they are often constructed as a regular ideal model. Furthermore, it is unclear which tear should be closed for the best treatment when there are multi entry tears. Purpose: The aims of this paper were to provide an assessment method for the selection of the surgical closure location for type B aortic dissection. Five 3D models of multiple entry tears in type B aortic dissection were produced using real patient computed tomography (CT) images to perform hemodynamic analyses of flow velocity streamlines, wall pressure, and wall shear stress. Methods: A Boolean operation was adopted to establish 3D models with multiple entry tears in type B aortic dissection based on patient‐specific CT images. The Mimics and Ansys plug‐in The Integrated Computer Engineering and Manufacturing code for Computational Fluid Dynamics (ICEM CFD) software were applied to mesh the 3D models. The flow velocity streamlines, wall pressures, and wall shear stresses were then analyzed in the finite element analysis software Fluent. Five 3D models were produced to compare the hemodynamic characteristics of different entry tear numbers, as well as the changes of different closure positions before and after closure. Results: The false lumen of the model with two entry tears had a higher wall pressure than that of model with multiple entry tears, which may tend to squeeze the true lumen and expand the false lumen. The load distribution of the vessel in the model with multiple entry tears had a more balanced flow velocity, and its wall pressure and shear stress were lower than that of model with two entry tears. For aortic dissection with two entry tears, the closure of the proximal entry tear was recommended, which helped to isolate and thrombose the false lumen, thereby improving the blood supply function of the true lumen. Because the postoperative vascular flow velocity and mechanical load performance of the vascular wall were still higher than those of normal blood vessels, the postoperative blood vessels remained pathological, and TEVAR did not restore the blood vessels to their original healthy state. Conclusions: Type B aortic dissection with two entry tears tend to squeeze the true lumen and expand the false lumen, resulting in a new entry tear and deterioration into multiple entry type B aortic dissection. The model of the vessel with multiple entry tears had a more balanced distribution in flow velocity and a smaller wall pressure and shear stress than that of the vessel with two entry tears. The closure of the proximal entry tear was considered an ideal solution for type B aortic dissection with two entry tears. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To evaluate the midterm efficacy of the Castor stent (CS) versus in situ fenestration (ISF) for reconstructing the left subclavian artery (LSA) in patients with type B aortic dissection (TBAD). Between July 2017 and July 2022, a total of 247 patients with TBAD were enrolled. One hundred thirty‐seven patients were treated using CSs (group A), while the remaining 110 patients received ISFs (group B). Data of the two groups were retrospectively analyzed. The success rates of surgery were 99.3% and 95.5% in groups A and B (p =.053), There were no deaths during hospitalization. During surgery, group B showed a longer surgical duration [68.0 (66.0, 77.0) vs. 62.0 (59.0, 66.0) min, p <.001] and intraoperative fluoroscopy time [18.0 (16.0, 20.0) vs. 16.0 (14.0, 18.0) min, p <.001] than group A. The follow‐up duration was similar for both groups (44.0 vs. 43.0 months, p =.877), and no patient died. Stent‐related complications were significantly lower in group A than in group B (1.5% vs. 8.4%, p =.009). Group A had fewer instances entry flow (0.7% vs. 4.7%, p =.048) and stent stenosis (0.7% vs. 2.8%, p =.206) than group B. All reintervention cases (4.7%) were from group B (p =.011). The rate of false aortic lumen thrombosis was significantly higher in group A than in group B (84.6% vs. 72.9%, p =.024). Both CSs and ISFs are evidently safe, feasible, and effective in achieving positive early outcomes in patients undergoing treatment for TBAD. Notably, at midterm follow‐up, CSs appeared to be superior to ISF in terms of reducing stent‐related complications and minimizing the need for reintervention. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Optimal medical therapy (OMT) for uncomplicated type B aortic dissection (uTBAD) provides excellent short-term outcomes during follow up; however, its long-term therapeutic effectiveness is unsatisfactory. This study evaluated the predictive value of systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) for adverse events among patients with acute uTBAD undergoing OMT. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database between 2013 and 2020. The primary end point in this study was composite outcomes including aortic intervention, all-cause mortality, retrograde type A aortic dissection (rTAAD) and aortic diameter growth > 5 mm. The patients were divided into high and low SII groups according to the optimal cut-off value of SII as determined using the receiver operating characteristic curve. Cox proportional hazards models were constructed to estimate the hazards ratios and identify the predictors of composite outcomes. Results: A total of 124 patients with acute uTBAD who underwent OMT were enrolled. One patient died during hospitalisation. At the end of a mean follow-up duration of 51 ± 23 months, 53 (43.1%) patients experienced composite outcomes, 15 patients (12.2%) died, 31 (25.2%) underwent aortic intervention, 21 (17.1%) exhibited diameter growth of > 5 mm, and 2 developed rTAAD. The patients were divided into low SII group (n = 78, 62.9%) and high SII group (n = 46, 37.1%) as per the optimal cut-off SII value of 1449. The incidence of composite outcomes in high SII group was significantly higher than that in low SII (28 [60.9%] vs. 26[33.3%], p < 0.01). Patients with high SII demonstrated significantly higher mortality rate than those with a low SII (11 [23.9%] vs. 5 [6.4%], respectively; p < 0.01). In addition, the high SII group had significantly higher rate of aortic-related reinterventions than the low SII group (16 [34.8%] vs. 15 [19.2%], p = 0.03). Multivariable Cox analyses showed that a high SII score was independently associated with composite outcomes rate (hazard ratio, 2.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.22–3.78; p < 0.01). Conclusions: The long-term therapeutic effectiveness of OMT alone in patients with acute uTBAD is unsatisfactory. An SII > 1449 at the time of diagnosis is an independent predictor of OMT failure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Right-side aortic arch concomitant with Kommerell's diverticulum (KD) is a rare and complex ailment, and there is no consensus on the optimal strategy to deal with this congenital anomaly. We retrospectively analyzed and summary of the cases treated in our center with individual treatment methods for different situations. Methods: Between September 2018 and December 2021, 10 patients experienced surgical therapy at our institution who presented with a Kommerell's diverticulum arising from an aberrant subclavian artery from the right-side aortic arch. Four main surgical techniques were applied to those patients: 1. total arch replacement with frozen elephant trunk implantation (n = 2); 2. hybrid procedure combining open arch repair and endovascular intervention (n = 1); 3. total endovascular repair using thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) with or without left subclavian artery (LSCA) revascularization (n = 6); 4. direct repair underwent endoaneurysmorrhaphy. Clinical characteristics and outcomes were collected. Results: The mean age of these 10 patients was 56.5 years (range 29–79 years) and only 1 woman. The pathology includes aortic dissection (n = 6) and aneurysm (n = 4). The mean diverticulum size was 41.4 [24.2–56.8] mm. There were no in-hospital deaths, and the median hospital stay was 22 [15–43] days. During the follow-up period (21.4 months, 1–44 months), one died of an unknown cause and one died of esophageal fistula. Two patients underwent second-stage endovascular intervention for distal lesion. And none of the patients had endoleak during the follow-up period. Conclusions: Each of the procedures we have mentioned here has its advantages and disadvantages; individualized treatment should meet the appropriate indications. A single-branched stent graft is feasible and effective in the treatment of aortic disease combined with Kommerell's diverticulum. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BackgroundThe left subclavian artery (LSA) can be intentionally covered by a stent graft to acquire adequate landing zones for a proximal entry tear near the LSA during thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). The Castor single-branched stent graft is designed to treat type B aortic dissection (TBAD) to retain the LSA during TEVAR. This study investigates clinical outcomes, aortic remodeling, and abdominal aortic perfusion patterns after TEVAR with the novel Castor device.MethodsFrom November 2020 to June 2023, 29 patients with TBAD involving the LSA were treated with the Castor single-branched stent graft. In-hospital clinical outcome and aortic computed tomography angiography (CTA) data were analyzed. CTA was performed preoperatively and at follow-up to observe stent morphology; branch patency; endoleak; change in true lumen (TL), false lumen (FL), and transaortic diameters; and abdominal aortic branch perfusion pattern.ResultsThe technical success rate was 96.6%. One failure was that the branch section did not completely enter the LSA and the main body migrated distally. No in-hospital mortality, paraplegia, or stroke occurred. During follow-up, one type Ib endoleak, four distal new entry tears, and one recurrent type A dissection arose from a new entry tear at the ascending aorta, no stent migration was observed, and the branch patency rate was 100%. At the thoracic aorta, TL diameters significantly increased, FL diameters markedly decreased, and FL was partially or completely thrombosed in most patients at follow-up. At the abdominal aorta, we observed 33.3% of TL growth and 66.7% of TL stabilization or shrinkage. The initial TL ratio at iliac bifurcation negatively predicted abdominal TL growth after TEVAR with a cutoff of 21.0%. Of the 102 abdominal aortic branches, 94.1% of the branches showed no change in perfusion pattern, 3.9% of the branches had an increased TL perfusion, and 2.0% of the branches had an increased FL contribution.ConclusionThe Castor unibody single-branched stent graft offers an efficient endovascular treatment for TBAD involving the LSA. TEVAR with the Castor device effectively induced thoracic FL thrombosis and thoracic TL enlargement and resulted in abdominal TL growth when the initial TL ratio at iliac bifurcation is less than 21.0%. Abdominal aortic branch perfusion patterns remain relatively stable after TEVAR with the Castor stent graft.

INTRODUCTION: Heterogeneity in the epidemiology, management, and in-hospital outcomes of patients with acute aortic syndromes can be found among male and female populations. This study aims to analyze sex-related differences in a cohort of patients treated in a tertiary university center. METHODS: All patients admitted with acute aortic syndromes between January 2012 and January 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. A descriptive analysis of the data was performed, and the results were queried to explore sex-related differences according to the type of aortic syndrome, type of treatment (medical or surgical – conventional or endovascular), and the temporal phase of the disease in which this treatment occurred. A multivariable logistic regression was undertaken to identify variables associated with higher in-hospital mortality. Variables were included if statistically significant in the univariable analysis or if considered medically relevant. RESULTS: A total of 116 patients (69% male) were included. Women were older (median age [interquartile range]: 64.6 years [40–85 years], n=36 versus 58.7 [23–84], n=80; P=0.034), had a higher proportion of intramural hematoma (19.4% versus 5.0%, P=0.014) and a lower proportion of aortic dissection (72.2% versus 88.8%, P=0.026) compared to men. Both sexes were more frequently treated with medical therapy alone (33.6%). However, women had a trend towards a lower proportion of open surgical management compared to men (16.7% versus 23.8%, P=0.391), as well as higher in-hospital mortality associated with this type of treatment (50.0% versus 21.1%, P=0.169). Additionally, women were associated with a higher conversion to endovascular or open surgery when first managed conservatively (13.9% versus 3.8%, P=0.046). In binary logistic regression, age was associated with higher in-hospital mortality (OR 1.056 [95% CI, 1.01-1.10]; P=0.014), but not female sex (OR 1.133 [95% CI, 0.39-3.30]; P=0.819). CONCLUSION: Women were older, had more intramural hematoma, and were associated with a higher conversion from medical to surgical treatment. After multivariable regression, age was associated with higher in-hospital mortality, but female sex was not. Larger cohorts are needed to understand if intervention in female patients will have an impact on intra-hospital mortality.

Abstract Background Stent graft-induced new entry (SINE), defined as the stent graft-induced formation of a new entry point for blood to enter an area, is increasingly being observed after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for Stanford type B aortic dissection worldwide. We herein describe a case of Stanford type A aortic dissection due to proximal SINE after TEVAR for Stanford type B dissection. Case presentation This case involved a 58-year-old man with type A aortic dissection due to SINE. Six years previously, he had developed severe back pain and was diagnosed with type B aortic dissection after computed tomography examination. Because the primary entry was positioned at the descending aorta, we conducted TEVAR for exclusion of the entry with a GORE TAG conformable thoracic aortic graft. He was thereafter followed by our hospital. Six years later, he developed jaw pain and was examined at another hospital. He was transferred to our hospital because of the possibility of type A dissection. Computed tomography revealed type A aortic dissection with proximal site SINE. Emergency partial arch replacement was conducted, and he was discharged on postoperative day 27. Because the entry was at the lesser curve of the arch, we excluded the entry and conducted partial arch replacement. Conclusions In this case, proximal SINE occurred 6 years after TEVAR. Because SINE may occur even in the long term after TEVAR, careful follow-up is necessary.

Purpose: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for type B aortic dissection (TBAD) is already well introduced, but the best time point to perform TEVAR has not been defined. This study was to report mid- to long-term outcomes and aortic remodeling of TEVAR in patients with TBAD. Materials and Methods: In total, 318 TBAD patients from June 2001 to May 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into 3 groups depending on interval between dissection onset to TEVAR: acute (0–7 days), subacute (8–30 days), and chronic (>30 days). Clinical and morphological data were collected and analyzed. Results: The follow-up aorta-related mortality rates in the 3 groups were 17.6%, 2.6%, 4.2%, and the proximal stent-induced new entry rates were 11.8%, 1.6%, 2.8%, respectively. Aortic remodeling was satisfied in both the acute and subacute group, but the false lumen diameter did not decrease (p>0.05) in the chronic group. Compared with the VIRTUE classification (acute, 0–14 days; subacute, 15–92 days; chronic, >92 days), mid- to long-term outcomes of patients within the first overlapped interval between the 2 classifications (8–14 days) were similar to that of subacute patients (15–30 days), while aortic remodeling of patients in the second overlapped interval (31–92 days) was similar to that of chronic patients (>92 days). Conclusions: This study suggests that TEVAR for subacute TBAD is associated with a low long-term rate of aorta-related death. Aortic remodeling of chronic dissections is not satisfactory. Additional results suggest that the subacute phase (8–30 days) may be the optimal time to perform TEVAR for uncomplicated TBAD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the postoperative and intermediate outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients with type B aortic dissection (TBAD) undergoing TEVAR at our single center from January 2010 to December 2020. Patients with pre-existing ESRD were enrolled as the study group. One hundred consecutive patients from September 2013 to March 2015 without ESRD were included as the control group. The primary and secondary outcomes were adverse events and survival, respectively. Kaplan–Meier curves of survival and freedom from adverse events were calculated and analyzed using the log-rank univariate test. Multivariable analysis was used to isolate the effects of ESRD. Results: A total of 39 patients with ESRD and TBAD underwent TEVAR during the study period. The median follow-up time of patients with and without ESRD was 45 and 46 months, respectively. There was significant difference between the survival at 4 years of patients with and without ESRD (72.8% vs 94.9%; p = 0.011). Meanwhile, the incidence of adverse events was significantly higher in patients with ESRD (p = 0.026). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that ESRD (OR, 2.46; p = 0.049) and peripheral artery disease (OR, 4.11; p = 0.002) were the predictors of adverse events. Conclusions: The rates of adverse events and survival expectancy were poor in patients with ESRD and TBAD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: The utility of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in Type B Aortic dissections (TBAD) continues to advance at a growing rate. The purpose of this research was to investigate our management strategy and early-mid-term outcomes of endovascular procedures for TBAD, in a single tertiary center. Material and Methods: Sixty-six eligible TBAD patients (2 hyperacute complicated, 12 acute complicated and 52 uncomplicated) were enrolled in this single-center, retrospective cohort study between January 2016 and January 2023. The endpoints of the study were technical success, early and late morbidity and mortality, reinterventions throughout the follow-up period, as well as late open conversion. Results: Technical success was achieved in all cases. Early mortality was seen in only 3 patients (4.5%). Only patients with one hyperacute and two acute complicated TBAD (cTBAD) had early death. There was one late mortality in an acute cTBAD patient, who developed retrograde type A dissection two months after TEVAR. The median follow-up period was 26.1±13.7 months. Six reinterventions were performed for extension of dissection or covering the entries distally (9.1%). No endoleak, graft infection or migration were observed. Open surgical repair was performed; however, the patient did not survive. Conclusion: Early results of TEVAR in elective TBAD is trouble-free. Carrying the patients to the subacute phase seems to be the most suitable timing for TEVAR. Anti-stimulus and anti-hypertensive treatment with surveillance programme is mandatory for this patient cohort. Pre-emptive TEVAR has satisfactory results; however, long-term results are mandatory for further recommendations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Stent graft-induced new entry (SINE), defined as the stent graft-induced formation of a new entry point for blood to enter an area, is increasingly being observed after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for Stanford type B aortic dissection worldwide. We herein describe a case of Stanford type A aortic dissection due to proximal SINE after TEVAR for Stanford type B dissection. Case presentation: This case involved a 58-year-old man with type A aortic dissection due to SINE. Six years previously, he had developed severe back pain and was diagnosed with type B aortic dissection after computed tomography examination. Because the primary entry was positioned at the descending aorta, we conducted TEVAR for exclusion of the entry with a GORE TAG conformable thoracic aortic graft. He was thereafter followed by our hospital. Six years later, he developed jaw pain and was examined at another hospital. He was transferred to our hospital because of the possibility of type A dissection. Computed tomography revealed type A aortic dissection with proximal site SINE. Emergency partial arch replacement was conducted, and he was discharged on postoperative day 27. Because the entry was at the lesser curve of the arch, we excluded the entry and conducted partial arch replacement. Conclusions: In this case, proximal SINE occurred 6 years after TEVAR. Because SINE may occur even in the long term after TEVAR, careful follow-up is necessary. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Anas Abu Bokha, Chen-He Li, Ming-Yang Song, Xiang Wei, Rui Li Division of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence: Rui Li, Division of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, People’s Republic of China, Email lr_hbwh@yeah.netPurpose: Inflammation is a hallmark of the initial development and progression of aortic dissection. This study aimed to investigate the predictive value of preoperative neutrophils in aorta-related adverse events (AAEs) after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for type B aortic dissection (TBAD).Patients and Methods: A total of 80 patients with TBAD undergoing TEVAR were enrolled in our hospital. Preoperative inflammatory markers, including white blood cells (WBCs), neutrophils, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and plasma high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), were measured. Circulating neutrophil subpopulation was determined by flow cytometry. Kaplan–Meier curve was performed to determine whether neutrophil subsets independently predicted aorta-related adverse events (AAEs) after TEVAR.Results: Compared with control group, the prevalence of hypertension and the levels of inflammatory indicators including WBCs, total neutrophils, NLR, immature neutrophils and hs-CRP were significantly higher in TBAD patients. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve showed that NLR, absolute number of total neutrophils and percent CD10− immature neutrophils had excellent area under curves. During the 18-month follow-up, 16 (20.0%) were reported to occur AAEs, while 4 deaths (5.0%) were documented. Percent immature neutrophil was markedly higher in TBAD patients experiencing AAEs as compared with those without AAEs. Kaplan–Meier curve and Cox regression analysis demonstrated that percent immature neutrophil was the only predictor correlated with the occurrence of AAEs (hazard ratio 7.66, 95% CI: 2.91, 20.17, P = 0.018).Conclusion: Increased CD10− immature neutrophils could act as a potential biomarker related to long-term adverse outcomes in TBAD patients following TEVAR.Keywords: type B aortic dissection, thoracic endovascular aortic repair, aorta-related adverse events, neutrophil subsets

ObjectiveTo evaluate the outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for type B aortic dissection (TBAD) with aberrant right subclavian artery (ARSA).MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on patients with TBAD and ARSA who underwent TEVAR between the period of January 2017 and December 2022. Patient demographics, computed tomography angiography (CTA) measurements, surgical procedures, and postoperative outcomes were reviewed.ResultsA total of 9 patients (6 males and 3 females) were included in the study. 4 ARSA were reconstructed, 3 by periscope technique and 1 by in vitro fenestration technique. 3 left subclavian arteries (LSA) were reconstructed, 1 by the chimney technique and 2 by the single-branched stent technique. 2 patients underwent reconstruction of both ARSA and LSA. The overall technical success rate was 100%, with no occurrences of stroke, paraplegia, or mortality within 30 days. 1 patient experienced immediate type Ia endoleak, which resolved after 3 months. 1 patient developed weakness in the right upper limb, while 1 patient presented mild subclavian steal syndrome (SSS); both cases showed recovery during follow-up. The average follow-up duration was 35.6 ± 11.1 months, during which no reinterventions, deaths, or strokes were observed.ConclusionOur limited experience involving 9 patients demonstrates that early and mid-term outcomes of TEVAR for the treatment of TBAD with ARSA are satisfactory.

Objective: The incidence of type B aortic dissection (TBAD) is increasing worldwide; however, the underlying pathomechanisms are not conclusively understood. This study explores the geometric architecture of the aortic arch and supra-aortic branches in TBAD patients as opposed to non-TBAD patients. Methods: Patient characteristics were retrieved from archived medical records. Computer-assisted tomography (CAT) scans of patients with TBAD and carotid stenosis (CS) from two high-volume centers were analyzed. Various aortic arch parameters and take-off angles of the supra-aortic branches of TBAD patients were measured following centerline normalization in comparison CS patients. A compression index (C-index) was calculated from the para-sagittal, and a torsion index (T-index) was calculated from the para-coronal take-off angles of the supra-aortic branches to analyze aortic arch tortuosity. Results: A total of 199 CAT scans were analyzed, namely, 85 in the TBAD group and 114 in the CS group. The average age was 61.5 ± 13.1 years among the TBAD patients and 71 ± 9.3 years among the CS patients. We found a significantly higher proportion of type III aortic arch configurations in TBAD patients compared with CS patients. Further, the aortic arch angle was steeper in the TBAD group. In the para-sagittal plane, the left subclavian artery (LSA) take-off angle was less steep in TBAD patients. In the para-coronal plane, the left carotid artery (LCA) had a less steep take-off angle, while the LSA had a more obtuse take-off angle in the TBAD group when compared with the CS group. In addition, the inter-vessel distance was increased in TBAD patients. Finally, the T-index was increased, suggesting a significant torsion resulting from the deviating take-off angles of the supra-aortic branches supplying the left half of the body as opposed to the innominate artery (IA) in TBAD patients. Conclusions: Our results suggest several aortic arch-specific geometric configurations in patients suffering from TBAD that significantly differ from those in CS patients. Further functional studies are needed to verify the pathogenetic relevance of our results and their disease-specific causality. Although our data are not mechanistically explorative, they may serve as a basis for identifying future patients with aortic arch morphology at higher risk for TBAD development and who may benefit from more stringent adjustment of risk factors as a primary prevention concept. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The aim of this research is to determine the optimum blood pressure (BP) control goal for hypertensive type B aortic dissection (TBAD) patients undergoing surgery. Methods: Between January 2019 and April 2021, 259 hypertensive TBAD patients undergoing surgery were included in the research. 98 patients received intensive BP control with a target of systolic BP (SBP) < 120 mmHg, and 161 received standard BP control targeting SBP between 120 and 140 mmHg. Clinical data from two groups were compared. Results: Patients who received intensive BP control experienced a significantly higher incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) postoperatively (21/98, 21.4% vs 14/161, 8.7%, p = 0.004). The intensive group took more anti-hypertensive drugs per day compared with the standard group (1.9 vs 1.5, p < 0.001). Triple-drug combination treatment was more frequent in the intensive group (38.8% vs 14.3%, p < 0.001), as were angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB; 67.3% vs 44.7%, p 0.001), and thiazide-like diuretic (44.9% vs 18.0%, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Intensive BP control treatment increases the incidence of AKI and raises the utilization of the anti-hypertensive drug, but did not reduce the operative mortality and late mortality in TBAD patients undergoing surgical repair. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Acute type B aortic dissection (ATBD) is a rare yet serious cardiovascular event that potentially has an impact on health related quality of life (HRQoL). However, long term follow up data on this topic are scarce. This study aimed to review the long term HRQoL among patients treated for ATBD. In this multicentre, cross sectional survey study, consecutive treated patients with ATBD between 2007 and 2017 in four referral centres in the Netherlands were retrospectively included and baseline data were collected. Between 2019 and 2021 the 36 Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) was sent to all surviving patients (n = 263) and was compared with validated SF-36 scores in the Dutch general population stratified by age and sex. In total, 144 of 263 surviving patients completed the SF-36 (response rate 55%). Median (IQR) age was 68 (61, 76) years at completion of the questionnaire, and 40% (n = 58) were female. Initial treatment was medical in 55% (n = 79), endovascular in 41% (n = 59), and surgical in 4% (n = 6) of ATBD patients. Median follow up time was 6.1 (range 1.7–13.9; IQR 4.0, 9.0) years. Compared with the general population, patients scored significantly worse on six of eight SF-36 subdomains, particularly physical domains. Apart from bodily pain, there were no substantial differences in HRQoL between male and female ATBD patients. Compared with sex matched normative data, females scored significantly worse on five of eight subdomains, whereas males scored significantly lower on six subdomains. Younger patients aged 41–60 years seemed more severely impaired in HRQoL compared with the age matched general population. Treatment strategy did not influence HRQoL outcomes. Follow up time was associated with better Physical and Mental Component Summary scores. Long term HRQoL was impaired in ATBD patients compared with the Dutch general population, especially regarding physical status. This warrants more attention for HRQoL during clinical follow up. Rehabilitation programmes including exercise and physical support might improve HRQoL and increase patients' health understanding. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]