1. Optimal endoscopy timing in elderly patients presenting with acute non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
- Author
-
Cagir, Yavuz, Durak, Muhammed Bahaddin, and Yuksel, Ilhami
- Abstract
Background: To evaluate the optimal endoscopy time in elderly patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB) based on clinical outcomes. Methods: Patients over 65 years of age presenting with NVUGIB are three patient groups based on endoscopy timing: very early endoscopy (< 12 h), early endoscopy (12–24 h) and late endoscopy (> 24 h). Endoscopic intervention was undertaken during the first 12 h for patients who had unstable hemodynamic settings, ongoing bleeding, or a low hematocrit despite transfusion. The clinical outcomes investigated were: The primary endpoint was 30-day mortality, with the need for endoscopic intervention, rebleeding, and length of hospital stay considered as secondary endpoints. Results: The study population was 468, 260 of whom were ≥ 65 years. Based on the timing of endoscopy, very early endoscopy (within 12 h) was performed in 180 (69.2%) patients aged > 65 years and 150 (72.1%) younger patients (p > 0.05). Early endoscopy (12–24 h) was performed in patients aged > 65 years and younger patients 53 (20.4%) vs. 41 (19.7%), respectively, while late endoscopy (24–48 h) was performed in 27 (10.4%) vs. 17 (8.2%) patients, respectively (p > 0.05, for all parameters). The clinical results of subgroups based on endoscopy time in the ≥ 65 population and comparisons between groups. When groups were compared, it was found that the very early endoscopy group had a considerably lower likelihood of need for surgical/radiological intervention than the late endoscopy group [3 (1,7) vs. (3,7), p = 0.016], and 30-day mortality rates by the endoscopy timing were statistically significantly different in the very early group (15.6%), early endoscopy group (7.5%), and late endoscopy group (29.6%) (p < 0.05, for all groups). Endoscopy time within 24–48 h (late) (OR: 3.133, 95%Cl: 1.127–8.713, p: 0.029) was an independent predictor of rebleeding during the hospital stay. Conclusions: Early endoscopy may benefit the management of acute UGIB, especially in the elderly population with high comorbidities and the severity of bleeding. Highlights: UGIB is a significant clinical concern in older persons, who have higher rates of hospitalized adverse events and death than young patients. Because mortality tends to be higher in older patients with UGIB, determining the best endoscopic time becomes even more difficult. Close monitoring, risk stratification, and good endoscopic and medical treatment are important approaches for decreasing poor clinical outcomes in the elderly with UGIB. Very early endoscopy group over the age of 65 is associated with less surgical/radiological intervention and lower 30-day mortality. The establishment of a health assessment strategy for older patients presenting with acute UGIB should be advantageous, considering the rise in comorbidities associated with aging concomitant medications, and various chronic diseases that have contributed to morbidity and death. Early endoscopy may be beneficial in the therapy of acute UGIB, particularly in the elderly with significant comorbidities and severe bleeding. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF