Search

Your search keyword '"van't Hooft, J"' showing total 27 results
Start Over Author "van't Hooft, J"
27 results on '"van't Hooft, J"'

2. Effects of tocolysis with nifedipine or atosiban on child outcome: follow‐up of the APOSTEL III trial

Author

Winden, Tms, Klumper, J, Kleinrouweler, Ce, Tichelaar, Ma, Naaktgeboren, Ca, Nijman, Ta, Baar, Al, Wassenaer‐leemhuis, Ag, Roseboom, Tj, Van’t Hooft, J, Roos, C, Mol, Bw, Pajkrt, E, Oudijk, Ma, Development and Treatment of Psychosocial Problems, Leerstoel Baar, Development and Treatment of Psychosocial Problems, Leerstoel Baar, Graduate School, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, APH - Methodology, Neonatology, Other Research, Epidemiology and Data Science, APH - Aging & Later Life, APH - Health Behaviors & Chronic Diseases, ARD - Amsterdam Reproduction and Development, APH - Personalized Medicine, APH - Quality of Care, Obstetrics and gynaecology, and Amsterdam Reproduction & Development (AR&D)

Subjects
Pediatrics, medicine.medical_specialty, medicine.medical_treatment, preterm labour, law.invention, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, Randomized controlled trial, Nifedipine, law, executivefunction, follow-up, Medicine, Intubation, development, follow‐up, child, 030219 obstetrics & reproductive medicine, neurodevelopment, business.industry, Mortality rate, Incidence (epidemiology), Atosiban, General Obstetrics, Obstetrics and Gynecology, preterm birth, health, infant, behaviour, nifedipine, executive function, Neonatal outcomes, tocolysis, General health, business, medicine.drug
Abstract

Objective To compare the long‐term effects of tocolysis with nifedipine or atosiban on child outcome at age 2.5–5.5 years. Design The APOSTEL III trial was a multicentre randomised controlled trial that compared tocolysis with nifedipine or atosiban in 503 women with threatened preterm birth. Neonatal outcomes did not differ between both treatment arms, except for a higher incidence of intubation in the atosiban group. Methods Parents were asked to complete four questionnaires regarding neurodevelopment, executive function, behaviour problems and general health. Main outcome measures The main long‐term outcome measure was a composite of abnormal development at the age of 2.5–5.5 years. Results Of the 426 women eligible for follow‐up, 196 (46%) parents returned the questionnaires for 115 children in the nifedipine group and 110 children in the atosiban group. Abnormal development occurred in 32 children (30%) in the nifedipine group and in 38 children (38%) in the atosiban group (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.41–1.34). The separate outcomes for neurodevelopment, executive function, behaviour, and general health showed no significant differences between the groups. Sensitivity analysis for all children of the APOSTEL III trial, including a comparison of deceased children, resulted in a higher rate of healthy survival in the nifedipine group (64 versus 54%), but there was no significant difference in the overall mortality rate (5.4 versus 2.7%). There were no significant subgroup effects. Conclusion Outcomes on broad child neurodevelopment, executive function, behaviour and general health were comparable in both groups. Neither nifedipine nor atosiban can be considered as the preferred treatment for women with threatened preterm birth. Tweetable abstract Nifedipine‐ and atosiban‐exposed children had comparable long‐term outcomes, including neurodevelopment, executive function and behaviour., Tweetable abstract Nifedipine‐ and atosiban‐exposed children had comparable long‐term outcomes, including neurodevelopment, executive function, and behaviour.

Published
2020
Full Text
View/download PDF

3. A protocol for developing a core outcome set for ectopic pregnancy.

Author

Chong K.Y., Solangon S., Kemper J., Barnhart K., Andrieu P.C., Capmas P., Chacon C., Condous G., de Waard L., Duffy J.M.N., Horne A., Memtsa M., Mol F., Oza M., Strandell A., van Wely M., van't Hooft J., Vuong L.N., Zhang J., Jurkovic D., Mol B.W., Chong K.Y., Solangon S., Kemper J., Barnhart K., Andrieu P.C., Capmas P., Chacon C., Condous G., de Waard L., Duffy J.M.N., Horne A., Memtsa M., Mol F., Oza M., Strandell A., van Wely M., van't Hooft J., Vuong L.N., Zhang J., Jurkovic D., and Mol B.W.

Abstract

Background: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating ectopic pregnancy have reported many different outcomes, which are themselves often defined and measured in distinct ways. This level of variation results in an inability to compare results of individual RCTs. The development of a core outcome set to ensure outcomes important to key stakeholders are collected consistently will guide future research in ectopic pregnancy. Study aim: To develop and implement a core outcome set to guide future research in ectopic pregnancy. Methods and analysis: We have established an international steering group of key stakeholders, including healthcare professionals, researchers, and individuals with lived experience of ectopic pregnancy. We will identify potential outcomes from ectopic pregnancy from a comprehensive literature review of published randomised controlled trials. We will then utilise a modified Delphi method to prioritise outcomes. Subsequently, key stakeholders will be invited to score potential core outcomes on a nine-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (not important) to 9 (critical). Repeated reflection and rescoring should promote whole and individual stakeholder group convergence towards consensus 'core' outcomes. We will also establish standardised definitions and recommend high-quality measurements for individual core outcomes. Trial registration: COMET 1492. Registered in November 2019.Copyright © 2021, The Author(s).

Published
2021

4. Association between convalescent plasma treatment and mortality in COVID-19: a collaborative systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Author

Axfors C., Janiaud P., Schmitt A.M., van't Hooft J., Smith E.R., Haber N.A., Abayomi A., Abduljalil M., Abdulrahman A., Acosta-Ampudia Y., Aguilar-Guisado M., Al-Beidh F., Alejandria M.M., Alfonso R.N., Ali M., AlQahtani M., AlZamrooni A., Anaya J.-M., Ang M.A.C., Aomar I.F., Argumanis L.E., Averyanov A., Baklaushev V.P., Balionis O., Benfield T., Berry S., Birocco N., Bonifacio L.B., Bowen A.C., Bown A., Cabello-Gutierrez C., Camacho B., Camacho-Ortiz A., Campbell-Lee S., Cao D.H., Cardesa A., Carnate J.M., Castillo G.J.J., Cavallo R., Chowdhury F.R., Chowdhury F.U.H., Ciccone G., Cingolani A., Climacosa F.M.M., Compernolle V., Cortez C.F.N., Costa Neto A., D'Antico S., Daly J., Danielle F., Davis J.S., De Rosa F.G., Denholm J.T., Denkinger C.M., Desmecht D., Diaz-Coronado J.C., Diaz Ponce-Medrano J.A., Donneau A.-F., Dumagay T.E., Dunachie S., Dungog C.C., Erinoso O., Escasa I.M.S., Estcourt L.J., Evans A., Evasan A.L.M., Fareli C.J., Fernandez-Sanchez V., Galassi C., Gallo J.E., Garcia P.J., Garcia P.L., Garcia J.A., Garigliany M., Garza-Gonzalez E., Gauiran D.T.V., Gaviria Garcia P.A., Giron-Gonzalez J.-A., Gomez-Almaguer D., Gordon A.C., Gothot A., Grass Guaqueta J.S., Green C., Grimaldi D., Hammond N.E., Harvala H., Heralde F.M., Herrick J., Higgins A.M., Hills T.E., Hines J., Holm K., Hoque A., Hoste E., Ignacio J.M., Ivanov A.V., Janssen M., Jennings J.H., Jha V., King R.A.N., Kjeldsen-Kragh J., Klenerman P., Kotecha A., Krapp F., Labanca L., Laing E., Landin-Olsson M., Laterre P.-F., Lim L.-L., Lim J., Ljungquist O., Llaca-Diaz J.M., Lopez-Robles C., Lopez-Cardenas S., Lopez-Plaza I., Lucero J.A.C., Lundgren M., Macias J., Maganito S.C., Malundo A.F.G., Manrique R.D., Manzini P.M., Marcos M., Marquez I., Martinez-Marcos F.J., Mata A.M., McArthur C.J., McQuilten Z.K., McVerry B.J., Menon D.K., Meyfroidt G., Mirasol M.A.L., Misset B., Molton J.S., Mondragon A.V., Monsalve D.M., Moradi Choghakabodi P., Morpeth S.C., Mouncey P.R., Moutschen M., Muller-Tidow C., Murphy E., Najdovski T., Nichol A.D., Nielsen H., Novak R.M., O'Sullivan M.V.N., Olalla J., Osibogun A., Osikomaiya B., Oyonarte S., Pardo-Oviedo J.M., Patel M.C., Paterson D.L., Pena-Perez C.A., Perez-Calatayud A.A., Perez-Alba E., Perkina A., Perry N., Pouladzadeh M., Poyato I., Price D.J., Quero A.K.H., Rahman M.M., Rahman M.S., Ramesh M., Ramirez-Santana C., Rasmussen M., Rees M.A., Rego E., Roberts J.A., Roberts D.J., Rodriguez Y., Rodriguez-Bano J., Rogers B.A., Rojas M., Romero A., Rowan K.M., Saccona F., Safdarian M., Santos M.C.M., Sasadeusz J., Scozzari G., Shankar-Hari M., Sharma G., Snelling T., Soto A., Tagayuna P.Y., Tang A., Tatem G., Teofili L., Tong S.Y.C., Turgeon A.F., Veloso J.D., Venkatesh B., Ventura-Enriquez Y., Webb S.A., Wiese L., Wiken C., Wood E.M., Yusubalieva G.M., Zacharowski K., Zarychanski R., Khanna N., Moher D., Goodman S.N., Ioannidis J.P.A., Hemkens L.G., Axfors C., Janiaud P., Schmitt A.M., van't Hooft J., Smith E.R., Haber N.A., Abayomi A., Abduljalil M., Abdulrahman A., Acosta-Ampudia Y., Aguilar-Guisado M., Al-Beidh F., Alejandria M.M., Alfonso R.N., Ali M., AlQahtani M., AlZamrooni A., Anaya J.-M., Ang M.A.C., Aomar I.F., Argumanis L.E., Averyanov A., Baklaushev V.P., Balionis O., Benfield T., Berry S., Birocco N., Bonifacio L.B., Bowen A.C., Bown A., Cabello-Gutierrez C., Camacho B., Camacho-Ortiz A., Campbell-Lee S., Cao D.H., Cardesa A., Carnate J.M., Castillo G.J.J., Cavallo R., Chowdhury F.R., Chowdhury F.U.H., Ciccone G., Cingolani A., Climacosa F.M.M., Compernolle V., Cortez C.F.N., Costa Neto A., D'Antico S., Daly J., Danielle F., Davis J.S., De Rosa F.G., Denholm J.T., Denkinger C.M., Desmecht D., Diaz-Coronado J.C., Diaz Ponce-Medrano J.A., Donneau A.-F., Dumagay T.E., Dunachie S., Dungog C.C., Erinoso O., Escasa I.M.S., Estcourt L.J., Evans A., Evasan A.L.M., Fareli C.J., Fernandez-Sanchez V., Galassi C., Gallo J.E., Garcia P.J., Garcia P.L., Garcia J.A., Garigliany M., Garza-Gonzalez E., Gauiran D.T.V., Gaviria Garcia P.A., Giron-Gonzalez J.-A., Gomez-Almaguer D., Gordon A.C., Gothot A., Grass Guaqueta J.S., Green C., Grimaldi D., Hammond N.E., Harvala H., Heralde F.M., Herrick J., Higgins A.M., Hills T.E., Hines J., Holm K., Hoque A., Hoste E., Ignacio J.M., Ivanov A.V., Janssen M., Jennings J.H., Jha V., King R.A.N., Kjeldsen-Kragh J., Klenerman P., Kotecha A., Krapp F., Labanca L., Laing E., Landin-Olsson M., Laterre P.-F., Lim L.-L., Lim J., Ljungquist O., Llaca-Diaz J.M., Lopez-Robles C., Lopez-Cardenas S., Lopez-Plaza I., Lucero J.A.C., Lundgren M., Macias J., Maganito S.C., Malundo A.F.G., Manrique R.D., Manzini P.M., Marcos M., Marquez I., Martinez-Marcos F.J., Mata A.M., McArthur C.J., McQuilten Z.K., McVerry B.J., Menon D.K., Meyfroidt G., Mirasol M.A.L., Misset B., Molton J.S., Mondragon A.V., Monsalve D.M., Moradi Choghakabodi P., Morpeth S.C., Mouncey P.R., Moutschen M., Muller-Tidow C., Murphy E., Najdovski T., Nichol A.D., Nielsen H., Novak R.M., O'Sullivan M.V.N., Olalla J., Osibogun A., Osikomaiya B., Oyonarte S., Pardo-Oviedo J.M., Patel M.C., Paterson D.L., Pena-Perez C.A., Perez-Calatayud A.A., Perez-Alba E., Perkina A., Perry N., Pouladzadeh M., Poyato I., Price D.J., Quero A.K.H., Rahman M.M., Rahman M.S., Ramesh M., Ramirez-Santana C., Rasmussen M., Rees M.A., Rego E., Roberts J.A., Roberts D.J., Rodriguez Y., Rodriguez-Bano J., Rogers B.A., Rojas M., Romero A., Rowan K.M., Saccona F., Safdarian M., Santos M.C.M., Sasadeusz J., Scozzari G., Shankar-Hari M., Sharma G., Snelling T., Soto A., Tagayuna P.Y., Tang A., Tatem G., Teofili L., Tong S.Y.C., Turgeon A.F., Veloso J.D., Venkatesh B., Ventura-Enriquez Y., Webb S.A., Wiese L., Wiken C., Wood E.M., Yusubalieva G.M., Zacharowski K., Zarychanski R., Khanna N., Moher D., Goodman S.N., Ioannidis J.P.A., and Hemkens L.G.

Abstract

Background: Convalescent plasma has been widely used to treat COVID-19 and is under investigation in numerous randomized clinical trials, but results are publicly available only for a small number of trials. The objective of this study was to assess the benefits of convalescent plasma treatment compared to placebo or no treatment and all-cause mortality in patients with COVID-19, using data from all available randomized clinical trials, including unpublished and ongoing trials (Open Science Framework, https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/GEHFX). Method(s): In this collaborative systematic review and meta-analysis, clinical trial registries (ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform), the Cochrane COVID-19 register, the LOVE database, and PubMed were searched until April 8, 2021. Investigators of trials registered by March 1, 2021, without published results were contacted via email. Eligible were ongoing, discontinued and completed randomized clinical trials that compared convalescent plasma with placebo or no treatment in COVID-19 patients, regardless of setting or treatment schedule. Aggregated mortality data were extracted from publications or provided by investigators of unpublished trials and combined using the Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman random effects model. We investigated the contribution of unpublished trials to the overall evidence. Result(s): A total of 16,477 patients were included in 33 trials (20 unpublished with 3190 patients, 13 published with 13,287 patients). 32 trials enrolled only hospitalized patients (including 3 with only intensive care unit patients). Risk of bias was low for 29/33 trials. Of 8495 patients who received convalescent plasma, 1997 died (23%), and of 7982 control patients, 1952 died (24%). The combined risk ratio for all-cause mortality was 0.97 (95% confidence interval: 0.92; 1.02) with between-study heterogeneity not beyond chance (I2 = 0%). The RECOVERY trial had 69.8% and the unpublished evidence 25.3

Published
2021

5. Association between convalescent plasma treatment and mortality in COVID-19: a collaborative systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Author

Axfors, C, Janiaud, P, Schmitt, AM, Van't Hooft, J, Smith, ER, Haber, NA, Abayomi, A, Abduljalil, M, Abdulrahman, A, Acosta-Ampudia, Y, Aguilar-Guisado, M, Al-Beidh, F, Alejandria, MM, Alfonso, RN, Ali, M, AlQahtani, M, AlZamrooni, A, Anaya, J-M, Ang, MAC, Aomar, IF, Argumanis, LE, Averyanov, A, Baklaushev, VP, Balionis, O, Benfield, T, Berry, S, Birocco, N, Bonifacio, LB, Bowen, AC, Bown, A, Cabello-Gutierrez, C, Camacho, B, Camacho-Ortiz, A, Campbell-Lee, S, Cao, DH, Cardesa, A, Carnate, JM, Castillo, GJJ, Cavallo, R, Chowdhury, FR, Chowdhury, FUH, Ciccone, G, Cingolani, A, Climacosa, FMM, Compernolle, V, Cortez, CFN, Neto, AC, D'Antico, S, Daly, J, Danielle, F, Davis, JS, De Rosa, FG, Denholm, JT, Denkinger, CM, Desmecht, D, Diaz-Coronado, JC, Diaz Ponce-Medrano, JA, Donneau, A-F, Dumagay, TE, Dunachie, S, Dungog, CC, Erinoso, O, Escasa, IMS, Estcourt, LJ, Evans, A, Evasan, ALM, Fareli, CJ, Fernandez-Sanchez, V, Galassi, C, Gallo, JE, Garcia, PJ, Garcia, PL, Garcia, JA, Garigliany, M, Garza-Gonzalez, E, Gauiran, DT, Gaviria Garcia, PA, Giron-Gonzalez, J-A, Gomez-Almaguer, D, Gordon, AC, Gothot, A, Grass Guaqueta, JS, Green, C, Grimaldi, D, Hammond, NE, Harvala, H, Heralde, FM, Herrick, J, Higgins, AM, Hills, TE, Hines, J, Holm, K, Hoque, A, Hoste, E, Ignacio, JM, Ivanov, A, Janssen, M, Jennings, JH, Jha, V, King, RAN, Kjeldsen-Kragh, J, Klenerman, P, Kotecha, A, Krapp, F, Labanca, L, Laing, E, Landin-Olsson, M, Laterre, P-F, Lim, L-L, Lim, J, Ljungquist, O, Llaca-Diaz, JM, Lopez-Robles, C, Lopez-Cardenas, S, Lopez-Plaza, I, Lucero, JAC, Lundgren, M, Macias, J, Maganito, SC, Malundo, AFG, Manrique, RD, Manzini, PM, Marcos, M, Marquez, I, Javier Martinez-Marcos, F, Mata, AM, McArthur, CJ, McQuilten, ZK, McVerry, BJ, Menon, DK, Meyfroidt, G, Mirasol, MAL, Misset, B, Molton, JS, Mondragon, A, Monsalve, DM, Choghakabodi, PM, Morpeth, SC, Mouncey, PR, Moutschen, M, Muller-Tidow, C, Murphy, E, Najdovski, T, Nichol, AD, Nielsen, H, Novak, RM, O'Sullivan, MVN, Olalla, J, Osibogun, A, Osikomaiya, B, Oyonarte, S, Pardo-Oviedo, JM, Patel, MC, Paterson, DL, Pena-Perez, CA, Perez-Calatayud, AA, Perez-Alba, E, Perkina, A, Perry, N, Pouladzadeh, M, Poyato, I, Price, DJ, Quero, AKH, Rahman, MM, Rahman, MS, Ramesh, M, Ramirez-Santana, C, Rasmussen, M, Rees, MA, Rego, E, Roberts, JA, Roberts, DJ, Rodriguez, Y, Rodriguez-Bano, J, Rogers, BA, Rojas, M, Romero, A, Rowan, KM, Saccona, F, Safdarian, M, Santos, MCM, Sasadeusz, J, Scozzari, G, Shankar-Hari, M, Sharma, G, Snelling, T, Soto, A, Tagayuna, PY, Tang, A, Tatem, G, Teofili, L, Tong, SYC, Turgeon, AF, Veloso, JD, Venkatesh, B, Ventura-Enriquez, Y, Webb, SA, Wiese, L, Wiken, C, Wood, EM, Yusubalieva, GM, Zacharowski, K, Zarychanski, R, Khanna, N, Moher, D, Goodman, SN, Ioannidis, JPA, Hemkens, LG, Axfors, C, Janiaud, P, Schmitt, AM, Van't Hooft, J, Smith, ER, Haber, NA, Abayomi, A, Abduljalil, M, Abdulrahman, A, Acosta-Ampudia, Y, Aguilar-Guisado, M, Al-Beidh, F, Alejandria, MM, Alfonso, RN, Ali, M, AlQahtani, M, AlZamrooni, A, Anaya, J-M, Ang, MAC, Aomar, IF, Argumanis, LE, Averyanov, A, Baklaushev, VP, Balionis, O, Benfield, T, Berry, S, Birocco, N, Bonifacio, LB, Bowen, AC, Bown, A, Cabello-Gutierrez, C, Camacho, B, Camacho-Ortiz, A, Campbell-Lee, S, Cao, DH, Cardesa, A, Carnate, JM, Castillo, GJJ, Cavallo, R, Chowdhury, FR, Chowdhury, FUH, Ciccone, G, Cingolani, A, Climacosa, FMM, Compernolle, V, Cortez, CFN, Neto, AC, D'Antico, S, Daly, J, Danielle, F, Davis, JS, De Rosa, FG, Denholm, JT, Denkinger, CM, Desmecht, D, Diaz-Coronado, JC, Diaz Ponce-Medrano, JA, Donneau, A-F, Dumagay, TE, Dunachie, S, Dungog, CC, Erinoso, O, Escasa, IMS, Estcourt, LJ, Evans, A, Evasan, ALM, Fareli, CJ, Fernandez-Sanchez, V, Galassi, C, Gallo, JE, Garcia, PJ, Garcia, PL, Garcia, JA, Garigliany, M, Garza-Gonzalez, E, Gauiran, DT, Gaviria Garcia, PA, Giron-Gonzalez, J-A, Gomez-Almaguer, D, Gordon, AC, Gothot, A, Grass Guaqueta, JS, Green, C, Grimaldi, D, Hammond, NE, Harvala, H, Heralde, FM, Herrick, J, Higgins, AM, Hills, TE, Hines, J, Holm, K, Hoque, A, Hoste, E, Ignacio, JM, Ivanov, A, Janssen, M, Jennings, JH, Jha, V, King, RAN, Kjeldsen-Kragh, J, Klenerman, P, Kotecha, A, Krapp, F, Labanca, L, Laing, E, Landin-Olsson, M, Laterre, P-F, Lim, L-L, Lim, J, Ljungquist, O, Llaca-Diaz, JM, Lopez-Robles, C, Lopez-Cardenas, S, Lopez-Plaza, I, Lucero, JAC, Lundgren, M, Macias, J, Maganito, SC, Malundo, AFG, Manrique, RD, Manzini, PM, Marcos, M, Marquez, I, Javier Martinez-Marcos, F, Mata, AM, McArthur, CJ, McQuilten, ZK, McVerry, BJ, Menon, DK, Meyfroidt, G, Mirasol, MAL, Misset, B, Molton, JS, Mondragon, A, Monsalve, DM, Choghakabodi, PM, Morpeth, SC, Mouncey, PR, Moutschen, M, Muller-Tidow, C, Murphy, E, Najdovski, T, Nichol, AD, Nielsen, H, Novak, RM, O'Sullivan, MVN, Olalla, J, Osibogun, A, Osikomaiya, B, Oyonarte, S, Pardo-Oviedo, JM, Patel, MC, Paterson, DL, Pena-Perez, CA, Perez-Calatayud, AA, Perez-Alba, E, Perkina, A, Perry, N, Pouladzadeh, M, Poyato, I, Price, DJ, Quero, AKH, Rahman, MM, Rahman, MS, Ramesh, M, Ramirez-Santana, C, Rasmussen, M, Rees, MA, Rego, E, Roberts, JA, Roberts, DJ, Rodriguez, Y, Rodriguez-Bano, J, Rogers, BA, Rojas, M, Romero, A, Rowan, KM, Saccona, F, Safdarian, M, Santos, MCM, Sasadeusz, J, Scozzari, G, Shankar-Hari, M, Sharma, G, Snelling, T, Soto, A, Tagayuna, PY, Tang, A, Tatem, G, Teofili, L, Tong, SYC, Turgeon, AF, Veloso, JD, Venkatesh, B, Ventura-Enriquez, Y, Webb, SA, Wiese, L, Wiken, C, Wood, EM, Yusubalieva, GM, Zacharowski, K, Zarychanski, R, Khanna, N, Moher, D, Goodman, SN, Ioannidis, JPA, and Hemkens, LG

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Convalescent plasma has been widely used to treat COVID-19 and is under investigation in numerous randomized clinical trials, but results are publicly available only for a small number of trials. The objective of this study was to assess the benefits of convalescent plasma treatment compared to placebo or no treatment and all-cause mortality in patients with COVID-19, using data from all available randomized clinical trials, including unpublished and ongoing trials (Open Science Framework, https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/GEHFX ). METHODS: In this collaborative systematic review and meta-analysis, clinical trial registries (ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform), the Cochrane COVID-19 register, the LOVE database, and PubMed were searched until April 8, 2021. Investigators of trials registered by March 1, 2021, without published results were contacted via email. Eligible were ongoing, discontinued and completed randomized clinical trials that compared convalescent plasma with placebo or no treatment in COVID-19 patients, regardless of setting or treatment schedule. Aggregated mortality data were extracted from publications or provided by investigators of unpublished trials and combined using the Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman random effects model. We investigated the contribution of unpublished trials to the overall evidence. RESULTS: A total of 16,477 patients were included in 33 trials (20 unpublished with 3190 patients, 13 published with 13,287 patients). 32 trials enrolled only hospitalized patients (including 3 with only intensive care unit patients). Risk of bias was low for 29/33 trials. Of 8495 patients who received convalescent plasma, 1997 died (23%), and of 7982 control patients, 1952 died (24%). The combined risk ratio for all-cause mortality was 0.97 (95% confidence interval: 0.92; 1.02) with between-study heterogeneity not beyond chance (I2 = 0%). The RECOVERY trial had 69.8% and the unpublished evidence 25.3% o

Published
2021

6. Association between convalescent plasma treatment and mortality in COVID-19: a collaborative systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Author

Axfors, C., Janiaud, P., Schmitt, A. M., van't Hooft, J., Smith, E. R., Haber, N. A., Abayomi, A., Abduljalil, M., Abdulrahman, A., Acosta-Ampudia, Y., Aguilar-Guisado, M., Al-Beidh, F., Alejandria, M. M., Alfonso, R. N., Ali, M., Alqahtani, M., Alzamrooni, A., Anaya, J. -M., Ang, M. A. C., Aomar, I. F., Argumanis, L. E., Averyanov, A., Baklaushev, V. P., Balionis, O., Benfield, T., Berry, S., Birocco, N., Bonifacio, L. B., Bowen, A. C., Bown, A., Cabello-Gutierrez, C., Camacho, B., Camacho-Ortiz, A., Campbell-Lee, S., Cao, D. H., Cardesa, A., Carnate, J. M., Castillo, G. J. J., Cavallo, R., Chowdhury, F. R., Chowdhury, F. U. H., Ciccone, G., Cingolani, Antonella, Climacosa, F. M. M., Compernolle, V., Cortez, C. F. N., Costa Neto, A., D'Antico, S., Daly, J., Danielle, F., Davis, J. S., De Rosa, F. G., Denholm, J. T., Denkinger, C. M., Desmecht, D., Diaz-Coronado, J. C., Diaz Ponce-Medrano, J. A., Donneau, A. -F., Dumagay, T. E., Dunachie, S., Dungog, C. C., Erinoso, O., Escasa, I. M. S., Estcourt, L. J., Evans, A., Evasan, A. L. M., Fareli, C. J., Fernandez-Sanchez, V., Galassi, C., Gallo, J. E., Garcia, P. J., Garcia, P. L., Garcia, J. A., Garigliany, M., Garza-Gonzalez, E., Gauiran, D. T. V., Gaviria Garcia, P. A., Giron-Gonzalez, J. -A., Gomez-Almaguer, D., Gordon, A. C., Gothot, A., Grass Guaqueta, J. S., Green, C., Grimaldi, D., Hammond, N. E., Harvala, H., Heralde, F. M., Herrick, J., Higgins, A. M., Hills, T. E., Hines, J., Holm, K., Hoque, A., Hoste, E., Ignacio, J. M., Ivanov, A. V., Janssen, M., Jennings, J. H., Jha, V., King, R. A. N., Kjeldsen-Kragh, J., Klenerman, P., Kotecha, A., Krapp, F., Labanca, L., Laing, E., Landin-Olsson, M., Laterre, P. -F., Lim, L. -L., Lim, J., Ljungquist, O., Llaca-Diaz, J. M., Lopez-Robles, C., Lopez-Cardenas, S., Lopez-Plaza, I., Lucero, J. A. C., Lundgren, M., Macias, J., Maganito, S. C., Malundo, A. F. G., Manrique, R. D., Manzini, P. M., Marcos, M., Marquez, I., Martinez-Marcos, F. J., Mata, A. M., Mcarthur, C. J., Mcquilten, Z. K., Mcverry, B. J., Menon, D. K., Meyfroidt, G., Mirasol, M. A. L., Misset, B., Molton, J. S., Mondragon, A. V., Monsalve, D. M., Moradi Choghakabodi, P., Morpeth, S. C., Mouncey, P. R., Moutschen, M., Muller-Tidow, C., Murphy, E., Najdovski, T., Nichol, A. D., Nielsen, H., Novak, R. M., O'Sullivan, M. V. N., Olalla, J., Osibogun, A., Osikomaiya, B., Oyonarte, S., Pardo-Oviedo, J. M., Patel, M. C., Paterson, D. L., Pena-Perez, C. A., Perez-Calatayud, A. A., Perez-Alba, E., Perkina, A., Perry, N., Pouladzadeh, M., Poyato, I., Price, D. J., Quero, A. K. H., Rahman, M. M., Rahman, M. S., Ramesh, M., Ramirez-Santana, C., Rasmussen, M., Rees, M. A., Rego, E., Roberts, J. A., Roberts, D. J., Rodriguez, Y., Rodriguez-Bano, J., Rogers, B. A., Rojas, M., Romero, A., Rowan, K. M., Saccona, F., Safdarian, M., Santos, M. C. M., Sasadeusz, J., Scozzari, G., Shankar-Hari, M., Sharma, G., Snelling, T., Soto, A., Tagayuna, P. Y., Tang, A., Tatem, G., Teofili, Luciana, Tong, S. Y. C., Turgeon, A. F., Veloso, J. D., Venkatesh, B., Ventura-Enriquez, Y., Webb, S. A., Wiese, L., Wiken, C., Wood, E. M., Yusubalieva, G. M., Zacharowski, K., Zarychanski, R., Khanna, N., Moher, D., Goodman, S. N., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Hemkens, L. G., Cingolani A. (ORCID:0000-0002-3793-2755), Teofili L. (ORCID:0000-0002-7214-1561), Axfors, C., Janiaud, P., Schmitt, A. M., van't Hooft, J., Smith, E. R., Haber, N. A., Abayomi, A., Abduljalil, M., Abdulrahman, A., Acosta-Ampudia, Y., Aguilar-Guisado, M., Al-Beidh, F., Alejandria, M. M., Alfonso, R. N., Ali, M., Alqahtani, M., Alzamrooni, A., Anaya, J. -M., Ang, M. A. C., Aomar, I. F., Argumanis, L. E., Averyanov, A., Baklaushev, V. P., Balionis, O., Benfield, T., Berry, S., Birocco, N., Bonifacio, L. B., Bowen, A. C., Bown, A., Cabello-Gutierrez, C., Camacho, B., Camacho-Ortiz, A., Campbell-Lee, S., Cao, D. H., Cardesa, A., Carnate, J. M., Castillo, G. J. J., Cavallo, R., Chowdhury, F. R., Chowdhury, F. U. H., Ciccone, G., Cingolani, Antonella, Climacosa, F. M. M., Compernolle, V., Cortez, C. F. N., Costa Neto, A., D'Antico, S., Daly, J., Danielle, F., Davis, J. S., De Rosa, F. G., Denholm, J. T., Denkinger, C. M., Desmecht, D., Diaz-Coronado, J. C., Diaz Ponce-Medrano, J. A., Donneau, A. -F., Dumagay, T. E., Dunachie, S., Dungog, C. C., Erinoso, O., Escasa, I. M. S., Estcourt, L. J., Evans, A., Evasan, A. L. M., Fareli, C. J., Fernandez-Sanchez, V., Galassi, C., Gallo, J. E., Garcia, P. J., Garcia, P. L., Garcia, J. A., Garigliany, M., Garza-Gonzalez, E., Gauiran, D. T. V., Gaviria Garcia, P. A., Giron-Gonzalez, J. -A., Gomez-Almaguer, D., Gordon, A. C., Gothot, A., Grass Guaqueta, J. S., Green, C., Grimaldi, D., Hammond, N. E., Harvala, H., Heralde, F. M., Herrick, J., Higgins, A. M., Hills, T. E., Hines, J., Holm, K., Hoque, A., Hoste, E., Ignacio, J. M., Ivanov, A. V., Janssen, M., Jennings, J. H., Jha, V., King, R. A. N., Kjeldsen-Kragh, J., Klenerman, P., Kotecha, A., Krapp, F., Labanca, L., Laing, E., Landin-Olsson, M., Laterre, P. -F., Lim, L. -L., Lim, J., Ljungquist, O., Llaca-Diaz, J. M., Lopez-Robles, C., Lopez-Cardenas, S., Lopez-Plaza, I., Lucero, J. A. C., Lundgren, M., Macias, J., Maganito, S. C., Malundo, A. F. G., Manrique, R. D., Manzini, P. M., Marcos, M., Marquez, I., Martinez-Marcos, F. J., Mata, A. M., Mcarthur, C. J., Mcquilten, Z. K., Mcverry, B. J., Menon, D. K., Meyfroidt, G., Mirasol, M. A. L., Misset, B., Molton, J. S., Mondragon, A. V., Monsalve, D. M., Moradi Choghakabodi, P., Morpeth, S. C., Mouncey, P. R., Moutschen, M., Muller-Tidow, C., Murphy, E., Najdovski, T., Nichol, A. D., Nielsen, H., Novak, R. M., O'Sullivan, M. V. N., Olalla, J., Osibogun, A., Osikomaiya, B., Oyonarte, S., Pardo-Oviedo, J. M., Patel, M. C., Paterson, D. L., Pena-Perez, C. A., Perez-Calatayud, A. A., Perez-Alba, E., Perkina, A., Perry, N., Pouladzadeh, M., Poyato, I., Price, D. J., Quero, A. K. H., Rahman, M. M., Rahman, M. S., Ramesh, M., Ramirez-Santana, C., Rasmussen, M., Rees, M. A., Rego, E., Roberts, J. A., Roberts, D. J., Rodriguez, Y., Rodriguez-Bano, J., Rogers, B. A., Rojas, M., Romero, A., Rowan, K. M., Saccona, F., Safdarian, M., Santos, M. C. M., Sasadeusz, J., Scozzari, G., Shankar-Hari, M., Sharma, G., Snelling, T., Soto, A., Tagayuna, P. Y., Tang, A., Tatem, G., Teofili, Luciana, Tong, S. Y. C., Turgeon, A. F., Veloso, J. D., Venkatesh, B., Ventura-Enriquez, Y., Webb, S. A., Wiese, L., Wiken, C., Wood, E. M., Yusubalieva, G. M., Zacharowski, K., Zarychanski, R., Khanna, N., Moher, D., Goodman, S. N., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Hemkens, L. G., Cingolani A. (ORCID:0000-0002-3793-2755), and Teofili L. (ORCID:0000-0002-7214-1561)

Abstract

Background: Convalescent plasma has been widely used to treat COVID-19 and is under investigation in numerous randomized clinical trials, but results are publicly available only for a small number of trials. The objective of this study was to assess the benefits of convalescent plasma treatment compared to placebo or no treatment and all-cause mortality in patients with COVID-19, using data from all available randomized clinical trials, including unpublished and ongoing trials (Open Science Framework, https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/GEHFX). Methods: In this collaborative systematic review and meta-analysis, clinical trial registries (ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform), the Cochrane COVID-19 register, the LOVE database, and PubMed were searched until April 8, 2021. Investigators of trials registered by March 1, 2021, without published results were contacted via email. Eligible were ongoing, discontinued and completed randomized clinical trials that compared convalescent plasma with placebo or no treatment in COVID-19 patients, regardless of setting or treatment schedule. Aggregated mortality data were extracted from publications or provided by investigators of unpublished trials and combined using the Hartung–Knapp–Sidik–Jonkman random effects model. We investigated the contribution of unpublished trials to the overall evidence. Results: A total of 16,477 patients were included in 33 trials (20 unpublished with 3190 patients, 13 published with 13,287 patients). 32 trials enrolled only hospitalized patients (including 3 with only intensive care unit patients). Risk of bias was low for 29/33 trials. Of 8495 patients who received convalescent plasma, 1997 died (23%), and of 7982 control patients, 1952 died (24%). The combined risk ratio for all-cause mortality was 0.97 (95% confidence interval: 0.92; 1.02) with between-study heterogeneity not beyond chance (I2 = 0%). The RECOVERY trial had 69.8% and the unpublished evidence 25.3% of

Published
2021

10. Effects of tocolysis with nifedipine or atosiban on child outcome: follow‐up of the APOSTEL III trial

Author

Development and Treatment of Psychosocial Problems, Leerstoel Baar, Winden, Tms, Klumper, J, Kleinrouweler, Ce, Tichelaar, Ma, Naaktgeboren, Ca, Nijman, Ta, Baar, Al, Wassenaer‐leemhuis, Ag, Roseboom, Tj, Van’t Hooft, J, Roos, C, Mol, Bw, Pajkrt, E, Oudijk, Ma, Development and Treatment of Psychosocial Problems, Leerstoel Baar, Winden, Tms, Klumper, J, Kleinrouweler, Ce, Tichelaar, Ma, Naaktgeboren, Ca, Nijman, Ta, Baar, Al, Wassenaer‐leemhuis, Ag, Roseboom, Tj, Van’t Hooft, J, Roos, C, Mol, Bw, Pajkrt, E, and Oudijk, Ma

Published
2020

11. Developing a pre-eclampsia core outcome set. Round 1 results: 283 healthcare professionals, 41 researchers and 112 patients from 55 countries participated

Author

Duffy, JMN, Van't Hooft, J, Gale, C, Brown, M, Grobman, W, Fitzpatrick, R, Karumanchi, SA, Lucas, N, Magee, L, Mol, B, Stark, M, Thangaratinam, S, Wilson, M, Von Dadelszen, P, Williamson, P, Khan, K, Ziebland, S, McManus, RJ, and Medical Research Council

Subjects
Science & Technology, Obstetrics & Gynecology, 11 Medical And Health Sciences, Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine, Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Published
2017

15. P-hacking can be avoided with core outcome sets: preterm birth research is ready to take this leap.

Author

Hooft, J, Khan, KS, Van't Hooft, J, and Khan, K S

Subjects
PREMATURE labor, LABOR complications (Obstetrics), CLINICAL trials, PROGESTERONE, CERVICAL cerclage, LOW birth weight, PREMATURE infants, EVALUATION of medical care, PREGNANCY, PROGESTATIONAL hormones, RESEARCH
Abstract

The article by Thornton et al. establishes with data from progestogen trials something we have always feared, i.e. the corruption of reported results through selective publication of outcomes. In their analysis, trials with a predefined primary outcome showed no effect of progesterone consistently; trials that did not report a predefined primary outcome, however, had a tendency to show more promising results. Indeed this problem is so ingrained that even prospective registration of trials has not fully addressed it. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2017
Full Text
View/download PDF

16. Author Correction: Mortality outcomes with hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine in COVID-19 from an international collaborative meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Author

Axfors C, Schmitt AM, Janiaud P, Van't Hooft J, Abd-Elsalam S, Abdo EF, Abella BS, Akram J, Amaravadi RK, Angus DC, Arabi YM, Azhar S, Baden LR, Baker AW, Belkhir L, Benfield T, Berrevoets MAH, Chen CP, Chen TC, Cheng SH, Cheng CY, Chung WS, Cohen YZ, Cowan LN, Dalgard O, de Almeida E Val FF, de Lacerda MVG, de Melo GC, Derde L, Dubee V, Elfakir A, Gordon AC, Hernandez-Cardenas CM, Hills T, Hoepelman AIM, Huang YW, Igau B, Jin R, Jurado-Camacho F, Khan KS, Kremsner PG, Kreuels B, Kuo CY, Le T, Lin YC, Lin WP, Lin TH, Lyngbakken MN, McArthur C, McVerry BJ, Meza-Meneses P, Monteiro WM, Morpeth SC, Mourad A, Mulligan MJ, Murthy S, Naggie S, Narayanasamy S, Nichol A, Novack LA, O'Brien SM, Okeke NL, Perez L, Perez-Padilla R, Perrin L, Remigio-Luna A, Rivera-Martinez NE, Rockhold FW, Rodriguez-Llamazares S, Rolfe R, Rosa R, Røsjø H, Sampaio VS, Seto TB, Shahzad M, Soliman S, Stout JE, Thirion-Romero I, Troxel AB, Tseng TY, Turner NA, Ulrich RJ, Walsh SR, Webb SA, Weehuizen JM, Velinova M, Wong HL, Wrenn R, Zampieri FG, Zhong W, Moher D, Goodman SN, Ioannidis JPA, and Hemkens LG

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

17. A core outcome set for future research in ectopic pregnancy: an international consensus development study.

Author

Chong KY, Solangon S, Barnhart K, Causa-Andrieu P, Capmas P, Condous G, de Waard L, Duffy JMN, Horne AW, Memtsa M, Mol F, Oza M, Pesce R, Strandell A, van Wely M, Van't Hooft J, Vuong LN, Zhang J, Jurkovic D, and Mol BW

Subjects
Pregnancy, Female, Humans, Consensus, Delphi Technique, Treatment Outcome, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Research Design, Pregnancy, Ectopic diagnosis, Pregnancy, Ectopic epidemiology, Pregnancy, Ectopic therapy
Abstract

Objective: To address methodological deficiencies in published randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews, this study has developed a core outcome set to guide future research in ectopic pregnancy (EP)., Design: To identify potential outcomes, we performed a comprehensive literature review and interviews with individuals with lived experience in EP. Potential core outcomes were then entered into a 3-round Delphi survey. A total of 154 participants from 6 continents, comprising health care professionals, researchers, and individuals with lived experience in EP, completed all 3 rounds of the Delphi survey. Outcomes were prioritized at 3 consensus development meetings, and recommendations were developed on how to report these outcomes where possible., Setting: Not applicable., Patient(s): Health care professionals, researchers, and individuals with lived experience in EP., Intervention(s): Not applicable., Main Outcome Measure(s): Consensus for inclusion in core outcome set., Result(s): Six outcomes reached full consensus, including treatment success, resolution time, the number of additional interventions, adverse events, mortality and severe morbidity, and treatment satisfaction., Conclusion(s): The core outcome set with 6 outcomes for EP will help standardize reporting of clinical trials, facilitate implementation of findings into clinical practice, and enhance patient-centered care., (Copyright © 2023 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

18. Association between convalescent plasma treatment and mortality in COVID-19: a collaborative systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Author

Axfors C, Janiaud P, Schmitt AM, Van't Hooft J, Smith ER, Haber NA, Abayomi A, Abduljalil M, Abdulrahman A, Acosta-Ampudia Y, Aguilar-Guisado M, Al-Beidh F, Alejandria MM, Alfonso RN, Ali M, AlQahtani M, AlZamrooni A, Anaya JM, Ang MAC, Aomar IF, Argumanis LE, Averyanov A, Baklaushev VP, Balionis O, Benfield T, Berry S, Birocco N, Bonifacio LB, Bowen AC, Bown A, Cabello-Gutierrez C, Camacho B, Camacho-Ortiz A, Campbell-Lee S, Cao DH, Cardesa A, Carnate JM, Castillo GJJ, Cavallo R, Chowdhury FR, Chowdhury FUH, Ciccone G, Cingolani A, Climacosa FMM, Compernolle V, Cortez CFN, Costa Neto A, D'Antico S, Daly J, Danielle F, Davis JS, De Rosa FG, Denholm JT, Denkinger CM, Desmecht D, Díaz-Coronado JC, Díaz Ponce-Medrano JA, Donneau AF, Dumagay TE, Dunachie S, Dungog CC, Erinoso O, Escasa IMS, Estcourt LJ, Evans A, Evasan ALM, Fareli CJ, Fernandez-Sanchez V, Galassi C, Gallo JE, Garcia PJ, Garcia PL, Garcia JA, Garigliany M, Garza-Gonzalez E, Gauiran DTV, Gaviria García PA, Giron-Gonzalez JA, Gómez-Almaguer D, Gordon AC, Gothot A, Grass Guaqueta JS, Green C, Grimaldi D, Hammond NE, Harvala H, Heralde FM, Herrick J, Higgins AM, Hills TE, Hines J, Holm K, Hoque A, Hoste E, Ignacio JM, Ivanov AV, Janssen M, Jennings JH, Jha V, King RAN, Kjeldsen-Kragh J, Klenerman P, Kotecha A, Krapp F, Labanca L, Laing E, Landin-Olsson M, Laterre PF, Lim LL, Lim J, Ljungquist O, Llaca-Díaz JM, López-Robles C, López-Cárdenas S, Lopez-Plaza I, Lucero JAC, Lundgren M, Macías J, Maganito SC, Malundo AFG, Manrique RD, Manzini PM, Marcos M, Marquez I, Martínez-Marcos FJ, Mata AM, McArthur CJ, McQuilten ZK, McVerry BJ, Menon DK, Meyfroidt G, Mirasol MAL, Misset B, Molton JS, Mondragon AV, Monsalve DM, Moradi Choghakabodi P, Morpeth SC, Mouncey PR, Moutschen M, Müller-Tidow C, Murphy E, Najdovski T, Nichol AD, Nielsen H, Novak RM, O'Sullivan MVN, Olalla J, Osibogun A, Osikomaiya B, Oyonarte S, Pardo-Oviedo JM, Patel MC, Paterson DL, Peña-Perez CA, Perez-Calatayud AA, Pérez-Alba E, Perkina A, Perry N, Pouladzadeh M, Poyato I, Price DJ, Quero AKH, Rahman MM, Rahman MS, Ramesh M, Ramírez-Santana C, Rasmussen M, Rees MA, Rego E, Roberts JA, Roberts DJ, Rodríguez Y, Rodríguez-Baño J, Rogers BA, Rojas M, Romero A, Rowan KM, Saccona F, Safdarian M, Santos MCM, Sasadeusz J, Scozzari G, Shankar-Hari M, Sharma G, Snelling T, Soto A, Tagayuna PY, Tang A, Tatem G, Teofili L, Tong SYC, Turgeon AF, Veloso JD, Venkatesh B, Ventura-Enriquez Y, Webb SA, Wiese L, Wikén C, Wood EM, Yusubalieva GM, Zacharowski K, Zarychanski R, Khanna N, Moher D, Goodman SN, Ioannidis JPA, and Hemkens LG

Subjects
Humans, Immunization, Passive, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, SARS-CoV-2, Treatment Outcome, COVID-19 Serotherapy, COVID-19 therapy
Abstract

Background: Convalescent plasma has been widely used to treat COVID-19 and is under investigation in numerous randomized clinical trials, but results are publicly available only for a small number of trials. The objective of this study was to assess the benefits of convalescent plasma treatment compared to placebo or no treatment and all-cause mortality in patients with COVID-19, using data from all available randomized clinical trials, including unpublished and ongoing trials (Open Science Framework, https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/GEHFX )., Methods: In this collaborative systematic review and meta-analysis, clinical trial registries (ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform), the Cochrane COVID-19 register, the LOVE database, and PubMed were searched until April 8, 2021. Investigators of trials registered by March 1, 2021, without published results were contacted via email. Eligible were ongoing, discontinued and completed randomized clinical trials that compared convalescent plasma with placebo or no treatment in COVID-19 patients, regardless of setting or treatment schedule. Aggregated mortality data were extracted from publications or provided by investigators of unpublished trials and combined using the Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman random effects model. We investigated the contribution of unpublished trials to the overall evidence., Results: A total of 16,477 patients were included in 33 trials (20 unpublished with 3190 patients, 13 published with 13,287 patients). 32 trials enrolled only hospitalized patients (including 3 with only intensive care unit patients). Risk of bias was low for 29/33 trials. Of 8495 patients who received convalescent plasma, 1997 died (23%), and of 7982 control patients, 1952 died (24%). The combined risk ratio for all-cause mortality was 0.97 (95% confidence interval: 0.92; 1.02) with between-study heterogeneity not beyond chance (I 2  = 0%). The RECOVERY trial had 69.8% and the unpublished evidence 25.3% of the weight in the meta-analysis., Conclusions: Convalescent plasma treatment of patients with COVID-19 did not reduce all-cause mortality. These results provide strong evidence that convalescent plasma treatment for patients with COVID-19 should not be used outside of randomized trials. Evidence synthesis from collaborations among trial investigators can inform both evidence generation and evidence application in patient care., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Published
2021
Full Text
View/download PDF

19. A protocol for developing a core outcome set for ectopic pregnancy.

Author

Chong KY, Solangon S, Kemper J, Barnhart K, Andrieu PC, Capmas P, Chacon C, Condous G, de Waard L, Duffy JMN, Horne A, Memtsa M, Mol F, Oza M, Strandell A, van Wely M, Van't Hooft J, Vuong LN, Zhang J, Jurkovic D, and Mol BW

Subjects
Consensus, Delphi Technique, Female, Humans, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Pregnancy, Treatment Outcome, Pregnancy, Ectopic diagnosis, Pregnancy, Ectopic therapy, Research Design
Abstract

Background: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating ectopic pregnancy have reported many different outcomes, which are themselves often defined and measured in distinct ways. This level of variation results in an inability to compare results of individual RCTs. The development of a core outcome set to ensure outcomes important to key stakeholders are collected consistently will guide future research in ectopic pregnancy., Study Aim: To develop and implement a core outcome set to guide future research in ectopic pregnancy., Methods and Analysis: We have established an international steering group of key stakeholders, including healthcare professionals, researchers, and individuals with lived experience of ectopic pregnancy. We will identify potential outcomes from ectopic pregnancy from a comprehensive literature review of published randomised controlled trials. We will then utilise a modified Delphi method to prioritise outcomes. Subsequently, key stakeholders will be invited to score potential core outcomes on a nine-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (not important) to 9 (critical). Repeated reflection and rescoring should promote whole and individual stakeholder group convergence towards consensus 'core' outcomes. We will also establish standardised definitions and recommend high-quality measurements for individual core outcomes., Trial Registration: COMET 1492 . Registered in November 2019., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Published
2021
Full Text
View/download PDF

21. Author Correction: Mortality outcomes with hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine in COVID-19 from an international collaborative meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Author

Axfors C, Schmitt AM, Janiaud P, Van't Hooft J, Abd-Elsalam S, Abdo EF, Abella BS, Akram J, Amaravadi RK, Angus DC, Arabi YM, Azhar S, Baden LR, Baker AW, Belkhir L, Benfield T, Berrevoets MAH, Chen CP, Chen TC, Cheng SH, Cheng CY, Chung WS, Cohen YZ, Cowan LN, Dalgard O, de Almeida E Val FF, de Lacerda MVG, de Melo GC, Derde L, Dubee V, Elfakir A, Gordon AC, Hernandez-Cardenas CM, Hills T, Hoepelman AIM, Huang YW, Igau B, Jin R, Jurado-Camacho F, Khan KS, Kremsner PG, Kreuels B, Kuo CY, Le T, Lin YC, Lin WP, Lin TH, Lyngbakken MN, McArthur C, McVerry BJ, Meza-Meneses P, Monteiro WM, Morpeth SC, Mourad A, Mulligan MJ, Murthy S, Naggie S, Narayanasamy S, Nichol A, Novack LA, O'Brien SM, Okeke NL, Perez L, Perez-Padilla R, Perrin L, Remigio-Luna A, Rivera-Martinez NE, Rockhold FW, Rodriguez-Llamazares S, Rolfe R, Rosa R, Røsjø H, Sampaio VS, Seto TB, Shahzad M, Soliman S, Stout JE, Thirion-Romero I, Troxel AB, Tseng TY, Turner NA, Ulrich RJ, Walsh SR, Webb SA, Weehuizen JM, Velinova M, Wong HL, Wrenn R, Zampieri FG, Zhong W, Moher D, Goodman SN, Ioannidis JPA, and Hemkens LG

Published
2021
Full Text
View/download PDF

22. The long-term effect of prenatal progesterone treatment on child development, behaviour and health: a systematic review.

Author

Simons NE, Leeuw M, Van't Hooft J, Limpens J, Roseboom TJ, Oudijk MA, Pajkrt E, Finken M, and Painter RC

Subjects
Child, Female, Humans, Pregnancy, Risk Assessment methods, Risk Assessment statistics & numerical data, Child Development drug effects, Premature Birth prevention & control, Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects chemically induced, Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects diagnosis, Progesterone pharmacology
Abstract

Background: Progesterone is widely used in prenatal care. However, long-term effects of prenatal progesterone treatment on child development are unclear., Objectives: To evaluate long-term outcomes in children after prenatal progesterone treatment., Search Strategy: MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to 24 May 2020., Selection Criteria: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) reporting outcomes in children born to women who received progesterone treatment (compared with placebo or another intervention) during any trimester in pregnancy., Data Collection and Analysis: Two authors independently selected and extracted data. We used the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for randomised trials and Quality In Prognosis Studies., Main Results: Of 388 papers, we included seven articles based on five RCTs, comprising 4222 measurements of children aged 6 months to 8 years. All studies compared progesterone to placebo in second and/or third trimester for the prevention of preterm birth. Meta-analysis (two studies, n = 890 children) showed no difference in neurodevelopment as assessed by the Bayley-III Cognitive Composite score at 2 years between children exposed to progesterone versus placebo (Standardised Mean Difference -0.04, 95% Confidence Interval -0.26 to 0.19), I 2  = 22%. Heterogeneity prohibited additional meta-analyses. Other long-term outcomes showed no differences., Conclusions: Our systematic review comprising a multitude of developmental measurements with a broad age range did not find evidence of benefit or harm in offspring prenatally exposed to progesterone treatment for the prevention of preterm birth. We identified an urgent need for follow-up studies of prenatal progesterone administration in early pregnancy and effects in offspring beyond early childhood., Tweetable Abstract: Progesterone to prevent preterm birth: no effect on child development. Outcomes after first trimester progesterone are unclear., (© 2020 The Authors. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Published
2021
Full Text
View/download PDF

23. Mortality outcomes with hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine in COVID-19 from an international collaborative meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Author

Axfors C, Schmitt AM, Janiaud P, Van't Hooft J, Abd-Elsalam S, Abdo EF, Abella BS, Akram J, Amaravadi RK, Angus DC, Arabi YM, Azhar S, Baden LR, Baker AW, Belkhir L, Benfield T, Berrevoets MAH, Chen CP, Chen TC, Cheng SH, Cheng CY, Chung WS, Cohen YZ, Cowan LN, Dalgard O, de Almeida E Val FF, de Lacerda MVG, de Melo GC, Derde L, Dubee V, Elfakir A, Gordon AC, Hernandez-Cardenas CM, Hills T, Hoepelman AIM, Huang YW, Igau B, Jin R, Jurado-Camacho F, Khan KS, Kremsner PG, Kreuels B, Kuo CY, Le T, Lin YC, Lin WP, Lin TH, Lyngbakken MN, McArthur C, McVerry BJ, Meza-Meneses P, Monteiro WM, Morpeth SC, Mourad A, Mulligan MJ, Murthy S, Naggie S, Narayanasamy S, Nichol A, Novack LA, O'Brien SM, Okeke NL, Perez L, Perez-Padilla R, Perrin L, Remigio-Luna A, Rivera-Martinez NE, Rockhold FW, Rodriguez-Llamazares S, Rolfe R, Rosa R, Røsjø H, Sampaio VS, Seto TB, Shahzad M, Soliman S, Stout JE, Thirion-Romero I, Troxel AB, Tseng TY, Turner NA, Ulrich RJ, Walsh SR, Webb SA, Weehuizen JM, Velinova M, Wong HL, Wrenn R, Zampieri FG, Zhong W, Moher D, Goodman SN, Ioannidis JPA, and Hemkens LG

Subjects
Adult, COVID-19 complications, COVID-19 virology, Child, Chloroquine administration & dosage, Combined Modality Therapy adverse effects, Combined Modality Therapy methods, Comorbidity, Female, Humans, Hydroxychloroquine administration & dosage, International Cooperation, Odds Ratio, Patient Participation statistics & numerical data, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Infectious drug therapy, Pregnancy Complications, Infectious virology, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic statistics & numerical data, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 mortality, Chloroquine adverse effects, Hydroxychloroquine adverse effects, Pregnancy Complications, Infectious mortality, COVID-19 Drug Treatment
Abstract

Substantial COVID-19 research investment has been allocated to randomized clinical trials (RCTs) on hydroxychloroquine/chloroquine, which currently face recruitment challenges or early discontinuation. We aim to estimate the effects of hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine on survival in COVID-19 from all currently available RCT evidence, published and unpublished. We present a rapid meta-analysis of ongoing, completed, or discontinued RCTs on hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine treatment for any COVID-19 patients (protocol: https://osf.io/QESV4/ ). We systematically identified unpublished RCTs (ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, Cochrane COVID-registry up to June 11, 2020), and published RCTs (PubMed, medRxiv and bioRxiv up to October 16, 2020). All-cause mortality has been extracted (publications/preprints) or requested from investigators and combined in random-effects meta-analyses, calculating odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), separately for hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine. Prespecified subgroup analyses include patient setting, diagnostic confirmation, control type, and publication status. Sixty-three trials were potentially eligible. We included 14 unpublished trials (1308 patients) and 14 publications/preprints (9011 patients). Results for hydroxychloroquine are dominated by RECOVERY and WHO SOLIDARITY, two highly pragmatic trials, which employed relatively high doses and included 4716 and 1853 patients, respectively (67% of the total sample size). The combined OR on all-cause mortality for hydroxychloroquine is 1.11 (95% CI: 1.02, 1.20; I² = 0%; 26 trials; 10,012 patients) and for chloroquine 1.77 (95%CI: 0.15, 21.13, I² = 0%; 4 trials; 307 patients). We identified no subgroup effects. We found that treatment with hydroxychloroquine is associated with increased mortality in COVID-19 patients, and there is no benefit of chloroquine. Findings have unclear generalizability to outpatients, children, pregnant women, and people with comorbidities.

Published
2021
Full Text
View/download PDF

24. The worldwide clinical trial research response to the COVID-19 pandemic - the first 100 days.

Author

Janiaud P, Axfors C, Van't Hooft J, Saccilotto R, Agarwal A, Appenzeller-Herzog C, Contopoulos-Ioannidis DG, Danchev V, Dirnagl U, Ewald H, Gartlehner G, Goodman SN, Haber NA, Ioannidis AD, Ioannidis JPA, Lythgoe MP, Ma W, Macleod M, Malički M, Meerpohl JJ, Min Y, Moher D, Nagavci B, Naudet F, Pauli-Magnus C, O'Sullivan JW, Riedel N, Roth JA, Sauermann M, Schandelmaier S, Schmitt AM, Speich B, Williamson PR, and Hemkens LG

Subjects
Betacoronavirus, COVID-19, China, Coronavirus Infections prevention & control, Humans, Pandemics prevention & control, Pneumonia, Viral prevention & control, SARS-CoV-2, Clinical Trials as Topic, Coronavirus Infections drug therapy, Health Services Research trends, Pneumonia, Viral drug therapy
Abstract

Background : Never before have clinical trials drawn as much public attention as those testing interventions for COVID-19. We aimed to describe the worldwide COVID-19 clinical research response and its evolution over the first 100 days of the pandemic. Methods: Descriptive analysis of planned, ongoing or completed trials by April 9, 2020 testing any intervention to treat or prevent COVID-19, systematically identified in trial registries, preprint servers, and literature databases. A survey was conducted of all trials to assess their recruitment status up to July 6, 2020. Results: Most of the 689 trials (overall target sample size 396,366) were small (median sample size 120; interquartile range [IQR] 60-300) but randomized (75.8%; n=522) and were often conducted in China (51.1%; n=352) or the USA (11%; n=76). 525 trials (76.2%) planned to include 155,571 hospitalized patients, and 25 (3.6%) planned to include 96,821 health-care workers. Treatments were evaluated in 607 trials (88.1%), frequently antivirals (n=144) or antimalarials (n=112); 78 trials (11.3%) focused on prevention, including 14 vaccine trials. No trial investigated social distancing. Interventions tested in 11 trials with >5,000 participants were also tested in 169 smaller trials (median sample size 273; IQR 90-700). Hydroxychloroquine alone was investigated in 110 trials. While 414 trials (60.0%) expected completion in 2020, only 35 trials (4.1%; 3,071 participants) were completed by July 6. Of 112 trials with detailed recruitment information, 55 had recruited <20% of the targeted sample; 27 between 20-50%; and 30 over 50% (median 14.8% [IQR 2.0-62.0%]). Conclusions: The size and speed of the COVID-19 clinical trials agenda is unprecedented. However, most trials were small investigating a small fraction of treatment options. The feasibility of this research agenda is questionable, and many trials may end in futility, wasting research resources. Much better coordination is needed to respond to global health threats., Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed., (Copyright: © 2020 Janiaud P et al.)

Published
2020
Full Text
View/download PDF

25. Methods used to assess outcome consistency in clinical studies: A literature-based evaluation.

Author

Rogozińska E, Gargon E, Olmedo-Requena R, Asour A, Cooper NAM, Vale CL, and Van't Hooft J

Subjects
Databases, Bibliographic, Diagnostic Tests, Routine, Humans, Delivery of Health Care, Outcome Assessment, Health Care statistics & numerical data, Publications, Treatment Outcome
Abstract

Evaluation studies of outcomes used in clinical research and their consistency are appearing more frequently in the literature, as a key part of the core outcome set (COS) development. Current guidance suggests such evaluation studies should use systematic review methodology as their default. We aimed to examine the methods used. We searched the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) database (up to May 2019) supplementing it with additional resources. We included evaluation studies of outcome consistency in clinical studies across health subjects and used a subset of A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) 2 (items 1-9) to assess their methods. Of 93 included evaluation studies of outcome consistency (90 full reports, three summaries), 91% (85/93) reported performing literature searches in at least one bibliographic database, and 79% (73/93) was labelled as a "systematic review". The evaluations varied in terms of satisfying AMSTAR 2 criteria, such that 81/93 (87%) had implemented PICO in the research question, whereas only 5/93 (6%) had included the exclusions list. None of the evaluation studies explained how inconsistency of outcomes was detected, however, 80/90 (88%) concluded inconsistency in individual outcomes (66%, 55/90) or outcome domains (20%, 18/90). Methods used in evaluation studies of outcome consistency in clinical studies differed considerably. Despite frequent being labelled as a "systematic review", adoption of systematic review methodology is selective. While the impact on COS development is unknown, authors of these studies should refrain from labelling them as "systematic review" and focus on ensuring that the methods used to generate the different outcomes and outcome domains are reported transparently., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Published
2020
Full Text
View/download PDF

26. Child outcomes after placement of a cervical pessary in women with a multiple pregnancy: A 4-year follow-up of the ProTWIN trial.

Author

Simons NE, van de Beek C, van der Lee JH, Opmeer BC, van Wassenaer-Leemhuis AG, van Baar AL, Steenis L, Liem S, Schuit E, Bekedam D, Mol BWJ, and Van't Hooft J

Subjects
Adult, Cervical Length Measurement, Child, Preschool, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Surveys and Questionnaires, Cervix Uteri, Pessaries, Pregnancy, Multiple, Premature Birth prevention & control
Abstract

Introduction: The ProTWIN trial previously showed no beneficial effect of treatment with a cervical pessary vs usual care to prevent preterm birth in women with a multiple pregnancy. However, in women with a midtrimester short cervix (<38 mm), pessary did reduce the composite outcome of neonatal morbidity and mortality. This follow-up study evaluates the long-term outcomes of all children born to mothers who participated in the ProTWIN trial at 4 years of age., Material and Methods: Parents received the Ages and Stages Questionnaire, Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire and a health questionnaire. All questionnaires were reported separately and as a combined outcome (abnormal child outcome). A linear mixed effects model was used to adjust for correlated data in twins and correction for confounders was performed. In exploratory analysis, a composite outcome of death or survival with abnormal child outcome was used by combining extrapolated data on child outcome with survival data. All data were analyzed for the total group and the subgroup of women with midtrimester short cervix., Results: Of the original 813 women of the ProTWIN trial, we approached 579, of whom 258 participated (45%) in follow-up. We received questionnaires of 514 children (281 pessary vs 233 control), with 119 children in the subgroup of women with midtrimester short cervix. An abnormal child outcome was found in 23% in the pessary group vs 16% in the control group (odds ratio 1.58; 95% confidence interval 0.94-2.65). In exploratory analysis with extrapolated data on child outcome (n = 815), no difference in abnormal child outcome was seen between the pessary and control group. In the subgroup of women with a short cervix (n = 268), this composite outcome indicated a favorable outcome for children born to mothers with pessary., Conclusions: In women with a multiple pregnancy, the use of a cervical pessary did not improve development, behavior or physical outcomes of the surviving children at age 4., (© 2019 The Authors. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology (NFOG).)

Published
2019
Full Text
View/download PDF

27. Predicting developmental outcomes in premature infants by term equivalent MRI: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Author

Van't Hooft J, van der Lee JH, Opmeer BC, Aarnoudse-Moens CS, Leenders AG, Mol BW, and de Haan TR

Subjects
Female, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Male, Reproducibility of Results, Sensitivity and Specificity, Brain pathology, Developmental Disabilities diagnosis, Infant, Premature, Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Abstract

Background: This study aims to determine the prognostic accuracy of term MRI in very preterm born (≤32 weeks) or low-birth-weight (≤1500 g) infants for long-term (>18 months) developmental outcomes., Methods: We performed a systematic review searching Central, Medline, Embase, and PsycInfo. Two independent reviewers performed study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment. We documented sensitivity and specificity for three different MRI findings (white matter abnormalities (WMA), brain abnormality (BA), and diffuse excessive high signal intensity (DEHSI)), related to developmental outcomes including cerebral palsy (CP), visual and/or hearing problems, motor, neurocognitive, and behavioral function. Using bivariate meta-analysis, we estimated pooled sensitivity and specificity and plotted summary receiver operating characteristic (sROC) curves for different cut-offs of MRI., Results: We included 20 papers published between 2000 and 2013. Quality of included studies varied. Pooled sensitivity and specificity values (95 % confidence interval (CI)) for prediction of CP combining the three different MRI findings (using normal/mild vs. moderate/severe cut-off) were 77 % (53 to 91 %) and 79 % (51 to 93 %), respectively. For prediction of motor function, the values were 72 % (52 to 86 %) and 62 % (29 to 87 %), respectively. Prognostic accuracy for visual and/or hearing problems, neurocognitive, and/or behavioral function was poor. sROC curves of the individual MRI findings showed that presence of WMA provided the best prognostic accuracy whereas DEHSI did not show any potential prognostic accuracy., Conclusions: This study shows that presence of moderate/severe WMA on MRI around term equivalent age can predict CP and motor function in very preterm or low-birth-weight infants with moderate sensitivity and specificity. Its ability to predict other long-term outcomes such as neurocognitive and behavioral impairments is limited. Also, other white matter related tests as BA and DEHSI demonstrated limited prognostic value., Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO CRD42013006362.

Published
2015
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results