Search

The intensively studied Diameter problem is to find the diameter of a given connected graph. We investigate, for the first time in a structured manner, the complexity of Diameter for H-free graphs, that is, graphs that do not contain a fixed graph H as an induced subgraph. We first show that if H is not a linear forest with small components, then Diameter cannot be solved in subquadratic time for H-free graphs under SETH. For some small linear forests, we do show linear-time algorithms for solving Diameter. For other linear forests H, we make progress towards linear-time algorithms by considering specific diameter values. If H is a linear forest, the maximum value of the diameter of any graph in a connected H-free graph class is some constant dmax dependent only on H. We give linear-time algorithms for deciding if a connected H-free graph has diameter dmax, for several linear forests H. In contrast, for one such linear forest H, Diameter cannot be solved in subquadratic time for H-free graphs under SETH. Moreover, we even show that, for several other linear forests H, one cannot decide in subquadratic time if a connected H-free graph has diameter dmax under SETH.

The hyperbolicity of a graph, informally, measures how close a graph is (metrically) to a tree. Hence, it is intuitively similar to treewidth, but the measures are formally incomparable. Motivated by the broad study of algorithms and separators on planar graphs and their relation to treewidth, we initiate the study of planar graphs of bounded hyperbolicity. Our main technical contribution is a novel balanced separator theorem for planar $\delta$-hyperbolic graphs that is substantially stronger than the classic planar separator theorem. For any fixed $\delta \geq 0$, we can find balanced separator that induces either a single geodesic (shortest) path or a single geodesic cycle in the graph. An important advantage of our separator is that the union of our separator (vertex set $Z$) with any subset of the connected components of $G - Z$ induces again a planar $\delta$-hyperbolic graph, which would not be guaranteed with an arbitrary separator. Our construction runs in near-linear time and guarantees that size of separator is $\mathrm{poly}(\delta) \cdot \log n$. As an application of our separator theorem and its strong properties, we obtain two novel approximation schemes on planar $\delta$-hyperbolic graphs. We prove that Maximum Independent Set and the Traveling Salesperson problem have a near-linear time FPTAS for any constant $\delta$, running in $n\, \mathrm{polylog}(n) \cdot 2^{\mathcal{O}(\delta^2)} \cdot \varepsilon^{-\mathcal{O}(\delta)}$ time. We also show that our approximation scheme for Maximum Independent Set has essentially the best possible running time under the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH). This immediately follows from our third contribution: we prove that Maximum Independent Set has no $n^{o(\delta)}$-time algorithm on planar $\delta$-hyperbolic graphs, unless ETH fails.

The Integer Multicommodity Flow problem has been studied extensively in the literature. However, from a parameterised perspective, mostly special cases, such as the Disjoint Paths problem, have been considered. Therefore, we investigate the parameterised complexity of the general Integer Multicommodity Flow problem. We show that the decision version of this problem on directed graphs for a constant number of commodities, when the capacities are given in unary, is XNLP-complete with pathwidth as parameter and XALP-complete with treewidth as parameter. When the capacities are given in binary, the problem is NP-complete even for graphs of pathwidth at most 13. We give related results for undirected graphs. These results imply that the problem is unlikely to be fixed-parameter tractable by these parameters. In contrast, we show that the problem does become fixed-parameter tractable when weighted tree partition width (a variant of tree partition width for edge weighted graphs) is used as parameter.

We consider a natural generalization of Vertex Cover: the Subset Vertex Cover problem, which is to decide for a graph $G=(V,E)$, a subset $T \subseteq V$ and integer $k$, if $V$ has a subset $S$ of size at most $k$, such that $S$ contains at least one end-vertex of every edge incident to a vertex of $T$. A graph is $H$-free if it does not contain $H$ as an induced subgraph. We solve two open problems from the literature by proving that Subset Vertex Cover is NP-complete on subcubic (claw,diamond)-free planar graphs and on $2$-unipolar graphs, a subclass of $2P_3$-free weakly chordal graphs. Our results show for the first time that Subset Vertex Cover is computationally harder than Vertex Cover (under P $\neq$ NP). We also prove new polynomial time results. We first give a dichotomy on graphs where $G[T]$ is $H$-free. Namely, we show that Subset Vertex Cover is polynomial-time solvable on graphs $G$, for which $G[T]$ is $H$-free, if $H = sP_1 + tP_2$ and NP-complete otherwise. Moreover, we prove that Subset Vertex Cover is polynomial-time solvable for $(sP_1 + P_2 + P_3)$-free graphs and bounded mim-width graphs. By combining our new results with known results we obtain a partial complexity classification for Subset Vertex Cover on $H$-free graphs.

Dynamic programming on various graph decompositions is one of the most fundamental techniques used in parameterized complexity. Unfortunately, even if we consider concepts as simple as path or tree decompositions, such dynamic programming uses space that is exponential in the decomposition's width, and there are good reasons to believe that this is necessary. However, it has been shown that in graphs of low treedepth it is possible to design algorithms which achieve polynomial space complexity without requiring worse time complexity than their counterparts working on tree decompositions of bounded width. Here, treedepth is a graph parameter that, intuitively speaking, takes into account both the depth and the width of a tree decomposition of the graph, rather than the width alone. Motivated by the above, we consider graphs that admit clique expressions with bounded depth and label count, or equivalently, graphs of low shrubdepth (sd). Here, sd is a bounded-depth analogue of cliquewidth, in the same way as td is a bounded-depth analogue of treewidth. We show that also in this setting, bounding the depth of the decomposition is a deciding factor for improving the space complexity. Precisely, we prove that on $n$-vertex graphs equipped with a tree-model (a decomposition notion underlying sd) of depth $d$ and using $k$ labels, we can solve - Independent Set in time $2^{O(dk)}\cdot n^{O(1)}$ using $O(dk^2\log n)$ space; - Max Cut in time $n^{O(dk)}$ using $O(dk\log n)$ space; and - Dominating Set in time $2^{O(dk)}\cdot n^{O(1)}$ using $n^{O(1)}$ space via a randomized algorithm. We also establish a lower bound, conditional on a certain assumption about the complexity of Longest Common Subsequence, which shows that at least in the case of IS the exponent of the parametric factor in the time complexity has to grow with $d$ if one wishes to keep the space complexity polynomial., Comment: Conference version to appear at the European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2023)

We study Steiner Forest on $H$-subgraph-free graphs, that is, graphs that do not contain some fixed graph $H$ as a (not necessarily induced) subgraph. We are motivated by a recent framework that completely characterizes the complexity of many problems on $H$-subgraph-free graphs. However, in contrast to e.g. the related Steiner Tree problem, Steiner Forest falls outside this framework. Hence, the complexity of Steiner Forest on $H$-subgraph-free graphs remained tantalizingly open. In this paper, we make significant progress towards determining the complexity of Steiner Forest on $H$-subgraph-free graphs. Our main results are four novel polynomial-time algorithms for different excluded graphs $H$ that are central to further understand its complexity. Along the way, we study the complexity of Steiner Forest for graphs with a small $c$-deletion set, that is, a small set $S$ of vertices such that each component of $G-S$ has size at most $c$. Using this parameter, we give two noteworthy algorithms that we later employ as subroutines. First, we prove Steiner Forest is FPT parameterized by $|S|$ when $c=1$ (i.e. the vertex cover number). Second, we prove Steiner Forest is polynomial-time solvable for graphs with a 2-deletion set of size at most 2. The latter result is tight, as the problem is NP-complete for graphs with a 3-deletion set of size 2.

For any finite set $\mathcal{H} = \{H_1,\ldots,H_p\}$ of graphs, a graph is $\mathcal{H}$-subgraph-free if it does not contain any of $H_1,\ldots,H_p$ as a subgraph. In recent work, meta-classifications have been studied: these show that if graph problems satisfy certain prescribed conditions, their complexity is determined on classes of $\mathcal{H}$-subgraph-free graphs. We continue this work and focus on problems that have polynomial-time solutions on classes that have bounded treewidth or maximum degree at most~$3$ and examine their complexity on $H$-subgraph-free graph classes where $H$ is a connected graph. With this approach, we obtain comprehensive classifications for (Independent) Feedback Vertex Set, Connected Vertex Cover, Colouring and Matching Cut. This resolves a number of open problems. We highlight that, to establish that Independent Feedback Vertex Set belongs to this collection of problems, we first show that it can be solved in polynomial time on graphs of maximum degree $3$. We demonstrate that, with the exception of the complete graph on four vertices, each graph in this class has a minimum size feedback vertex set that is also an independent set.

For a fixed set ${\cal H}$ of graphs, a graph $G$ is ${\cal H}$-subgraph-free if $G$ does not contain any $H \in {\cal H}$ as a (not necessarily induced) subgraph. A recently proposed framework gives a complete classification on ${\cal H}$-subgraph-free graphs (for finite sets ${\cal H}$) for problems that are solvable in polynomial time on graph classes of bounded treewidth, NP-complete on subcubic graphs, and whose NP-hardness is preserved under edge subdivision. While a lot of problems satisfy these conditions, there are also many problems that do not satisfy all three conditions and for which the complexity in ${\cal H}$-subgraph-free graphs is unknown. We study problems for which only the first two conditions of the framework hold (they are solvable in polynomial time on classes of bounded treewidth and NP-complete on subcubic graphs, but NP-hardness is not preserved under edge subdivision). In particular, we make inroads into the classification of the complexity of four such problems: Hamilton Cycle, $k$-Induced Disjoint Paths, $C_5$-Colouring and Star $3$-Colouring. Although we do not complete the classifications, we show that the boundary between polynomial time and NP-complete differs among our problems and also from problems that do satisfy all three conditions of the framework, in particular when we forbid certain subdivisions of the ``H''-graph (the graph that looks like the letter ``H''). Hence, we exhibit a rich complexity landscape among problems for ${\cal H}$-subgraph-free graph classes.

For any particular class of graphs, algorithms for computational problems restricted to the class often rely on structural properties that depend on the specific problem at hand. This begs the question if a large set of such results can be explained by some common problem conditions. We propose such conditions for $HH$-subgraph-free graphs. For a set of graphs $HH$, a graph $G$ is $HH$-subgraph-free if $G$ does not contain any of graph from $H$ as a subgraph. Our conditions are easy to state. A graph problem must be efficiently solvable on graphs of bounded treewidth, computationally hard on subcubic graphs, and computational hardness must be preserved under edge subdivision of subcubic graphs. Our meta-classification says that if a graph problem satisfies all three conditions, then for every finite set $HH$, it is ``efficiently solvable'' on $HH$-subgraph-free graphs if $HH$ contains a disjoint union of one or more paths and subdivided claws, and is ``computationally hard'' otherwise. We illustrate the broad applicability of our meta-classification by obtaining a dichotomy between polynomial-time solvability and NP-completeness for many well-known partitioning, covering and packing problems, network design problems and width parameter problems. For other problems, we obtain a dichotomy between almost-linear-time solvability and having no subquadratic-time algorithm (conditioned on some hardness hypotheses). The proposed framework thus gives a simple pathway to determine the complexity of graph problems on $HH$-subgraph-free graphs. This is confirmed even more by the fact that along the way, we uncover and resolve several open questions from the literature.

We show that Edge Multiway Cut (also called Multiterminal Cut) and Node Multiway Cut are NP-complete on graphs of maximum degree $3$ (also known as subcubic graphs). This improves on a previous degree bound of $11$. Our NP-completeness result holds even for subcubic graphs that are planar., Comment: Appeared in Proceedings of SWAT 2024

We initiate the investigation of the parameterized complexity of Diameter and Connectivity in the streaming paradigm. On the positive end, we show that knowing a vertex cover of size $k$ allows for algorithms in the Adjacency List (AL) streaming model whose number of passes is constant and memory is $O(\log n)$ for any fixed $k$. Underlying these algorithms is a method to execute a breadth-first search in $O(k)$ passes and $O(k \log n)$ bits of memory. On the negative end, we show that many other parameters lead to lower bounds in the AL model, where $\Omega(n/p)$ bits of memory is needed for any $p$-pass algorithm even for constant parameter values. In particular, this holds for graphs with a known modulator (deletion set) of constant size to a graph that has no induced subgraph isomorphic to a fixed graph $H$, for most $H$. For some cases, we can also show one-pass, $\Omega(n \log n)$ bits of memory lower bounds. We also prove a much stronger $\Omega(n^2/p)$ lower bound for Diameter on bipartite graphs. Finally, using the insights we developed into streaming parameterized graph exploration algorithms, we show a new streaming kernelization algorithm for computing a vertex cover of size $k$. This yields a kernel of $2k$ vertices (with $O(k^2)$ edges) produced as a stream in $\text{poly}(k)$ passes and only $O(k \log n)$ bits of memory.

Paths $P^1,\ldots,P^k$ in a graph $G=(V,E)$ are mutually induced if any two distinct $P^i$ and $P^j$ have neither common vertices nor adjacent vertices. For a fixed integer $k$, the $k$-Induced Disjoint Paths problem is to decide if a graph $G$ with $k$ pairs of specified vertices $(s_i,t_i)$ contains $k$ mutually induced paths $P^i$ such that each $P^i$ starts from $s_i$ and ends at $t_i$. Whereas the non-induced version is well-known to be polynomial-time solvable for every fixed integer $k$, a classical result from the literature states that even $2$-Induced Disjoint Paths is NP-complete. We prove new complexity results for $k$-Induced Disjoint Paths if the input is restricted to $H$-free graphs, that is, graphs without a fixed graph $H$ as an induced subgraph. We compare our results with a complexity dichotomy for Induced Disjoint Paths, the variant where $k$ is part of the input.

Paths $P_1,\ldots, P_k$ in a graph $G=(V,E)$ are mutually induced if any two distinct $P_i$ and $P_j$ have neither common vertices nor adjacent vertices. The Induced Disjoint Paths problem is to decide if a graph $G$ with $k$ pairs of specified vertices $(s_i,t_i)$ contains $k$ mutually induced paths $P_i$ such that each $P_i$ starts from $s_i$ and ends at $t_i$. This is a classical graph problem that is NP-complete even for $k=2$. We introduce a natural generalization, Induced Disjoint Connected Subgraphs: instead of connecting pairs of terminals, we must connect sets of terminals. We give almost-complete dichotomies of the computational complexity of both problems for H-free graphs, that is, graphs that do not contain some fixed graph H as an induced subgraph. Finally, we give a complete classification of the complexity of the second problem if the number k of terminal sets is fixed, that is, not part of the input.

Streaming is a model where an input graph is provided one edge at a time, instead of being able to inspect it at will. In this work, we take a parameterized approach by assuming a vertex cover of the graph is given, building on work of Bishnu et al. [COCOON 2020]. We show the further potency of combining this parameter with the Adjacency List streaming model to obtain results for vertex deletion problems. This includes kernels, parameterized algorithms, and lower bounds for the problems of Pi-free Deletion, H-free Deletion, and the more specific forms of Cluster Vertex Deletion and Odd Cycle Transversal. We focus on the complexity in terms of the number of passes over the input stream, and the memory used. This leads to a pass/memory trade-off, where a different algorithm might be favourable depending on the context and instance. We also discuss implications for parameterized complexity in the non-streaming setting., Comment: 31 pages, 2 figures, an extended abstract appeared in the proceedings of FCT 2021, see http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86593-1_29

For the well-known Survivable Network Design Problem (SNDP) we are given an undirected graph $G$ with edge costs, a set $R$ of terminal vertices, and an integer demand $d_{s,t}$ for every terminal pair $s,t\in R$. The task is to compute a subgraph $H$ of $G$ of minimum cost, such that there are at least $d_{s,t}$ disjoint paths between $s$ and $t$ in $H$. If the paths are required to be edge-disjoint we obtain the edge-connectivity variant (EC-SNDP), while internally vertex-disjoint paths result in the vertex-connectivity variant (VC-SNDP). Another important case is the element-connectivity variant (LC-SNDP), where the paths are disjoint on edges and non-terminals. In this work we shed light on the parameterized complexity of the above problems. We consider several natural parameters, which include the solution size $\ell$, the sum of demands $D$, the number of terminals $k$, and the maximum demand $d_\max$. Using simple, elegant arguments, we prove the following results. - We give a complete picture of the parameterized tractability of the three variants w.r.t. parameter $\ell$: both EC-SNDP and LC-SNDP are FPT, while VC-SNDP is W[1]-hard. - We identify some special cases of VC-SNDP that are FPT: * when $d_\max\leq 3$ for parameter $\ell$, * on locally bounded treewidth graphs (e.g., planar graphs) for parameter $\ell$, and * on graphs of treewidth $tw$ for parameter $tw+D$. - The well-known Directed Steiner Tree (DST) problem can be seen as single-source EC-SNDP with $d_\max=1$ on directed graphs, and is FPT parameterized by $k$ [Dreyfus & Wagner 1971]. We show that in contrast, the 2-DST problem, where $d_\max=2$, is W[1]-hard, even when parameterized by $\ell$.

The well-known Disjoint Paths problem is to decide if a graph contains k pairwise disjoint paths, each connecting a different terminal pair from a set of k distinct pairs. We determine, with an exception of two cases, the complexity of the Disjoint Paths problem for $H$-free graphs. If $k$ is fixed, we obtain the $k$-Disjoint Paths problem, which is known to be polynomial-time solvable on the class of all graphs for every $k \geq 1$. The latter does no longer hold if we need to connect vertices from terminal sets instead of terminal pairs. We completely classify the complexity of $k$-Disjoint Connected Subgraphs for $H$-free graphs, and give the same almost-complete classification for Disjoint Connected Subgraphs for $H$-free graphs as for Disjoint Paths.

Paths $P_1,\ldots,P_k$ in a graph $G=(V,E)$ are mutually induced if any two distinct $P_i$ and $P_j$ have neither common vertices nor adjacent vertices (except perhaps their end-vertices). The Induced Disjoint Paths problem is to decide if a graph $G$ with $k$ pairs of specified vertices $(s_i,t_i)$ contains $k$ mutually induced paths $P_i$ such that each $P_i$ connects $s_i$ and $t_i$. This is a classical graph problem that is NP-complete even for $k=2$. We study it for AT-free graphs. Unlike its subclasses of permutation graphs and cocomparability graphs, the class of AT-free graphs has no geometric intersection model. However, by a new, structural analysis of the behaviour of Induced Disjoint Paths for AT-free graphs, we prove that it can be solved in polynomial time for AT-free graphs even when $k$ is part of the input. This is in contrast to the situation for other well-known graph classes, such as planar graphs, claw-free graphs, or more recently, (theta,wheel)-free graphs, for which such a result only holds if $k$ is fixed. As a consequence of our main result, the problem of deciding if a given AT-free graph contains a fixed graph $H$ as an induced topological minor admits a polynomial-time algorithm. In addition, we show that such an algorithm is essentially optimal by proving that the problem is W[1]-hard with parameter $|V_H|$, even on a subclass of AT-free graph, namely cobipartite graphs. We also show that the problems $k$-in-a-Path and $k$-in-a-Tree are polynomial-time solvable on AT-free graphs even if $k$ is part of the input. These problems are to test if a graph has an induced path or induced tree, respectively, spanning $k$ given vertices., Comment: An extended abstract of this paper appeared in the proceedings of SWAT 2012

A path in an edge-colored graph is rainbow if no two edges of it are colored the same, and the graph is rainbow-connected if there is a rainbow path between each pair of its vertices. The minimum number of colors needed to rainbow-connect a graph $G$ is the rainbow connection number of $G$, denoted by $\text{rc}(G)$. A simple way to rainbow-connect a graph $G$ is to color the edges of a spanning tree with distinct colors and then re-use any of these colors to color the remaining edges of $G$. This proves that $\text{rc}(G) \le |V(G)|-1$. We ask whether there is a stronger connection between tree-like structures and rainbow coloring than that is implied by the above trivial argument. For instance, is it possible to find an upper bound of $t(G) -1$ for $\text{rc}(G)$, where $t(G)$ is the number of vertices in the largest induced tree of $G$? The answer turns out to be negative, as there are counter-examples that show that even $c\cdot t(G)$ is not an upper bound for $\text{rc}(G))$ for any given constant $c$. In this work we show that if we consider the forest number $f(G)$, the number of vertices in a maximum induced forest of $G$, instead of $t(G)$, then surprisingly we do get an upper bound. More specifically, we prove that $\text{rc}(G) \leq f(G) + 2$. Our result indicates a stronger connection between rainbow connection and tree-like structures than that was suggested by the simple spanning tree based upper bound.

We consider the classical problems (Edge) Steiner Tree and Vertex Steiner Tree after restricting the input to some class of graphs characterized by a small set of forbidden induced subgraphs. We show a dichotomy for the former problem restricted to $(H_1,H_2)$-free graphs and a dichotomy for the latter problem restricted to $H$-free graphs. We find that there exists an infinite family of graphs $H$ such that Vertex Steiner Tree is polynomial-time solvable for $H$-free graphs, whereas there exist only two graphs $H$ for which this holds for Edge Steiner Tree. We also find that Edge Steiner Tree is polynomial-time solvable for $(H_1,H_2)$-free graphs if and only if the treewidth of the class of $(H_1,H_2)$-free graphs is bounded (subject to P $\neq$ NP). To obtain the latter result, we determine all pairs $(H_1,H_2)$ for which the class of $(H_1,H_2)$-free graphs has bounded treewidth.

Given a vertex-colored graph, we say a path is a rainbow vertex path if all its internal vertices have distinct colors. The graph is rainbow vertex-connected if there is a rainbow vertex path between every pair of its vertices. In the Rainbow Vertex Coloring (RVC) problem we want to decide whether the vertices of a given graph can be colored with at most $k$ colors so that the graph becomes rainbow vertex-connected. This problem is known to be NP-complete even in very restricted scenarios, and very few efficient algorithms are known for it. In this work, we give polynomial-time algorithms for RVC on permutation graphs, powers of trees and split strongly chordal graphs. The algorithm for the latter class also works for the strong variant of the problem, where the rainbow vertex paths between each vertex pair must be shortest paths. We complement the polynomial-time solvability results for split strongly chordal graphs by showing that, for any fixed $p\geq 3$ both variants of the problem become NP-complete when restricted to split $(S_3,\ldots,S_p)$-free graphs, where $S_q$ denotes the $q$-sun graph.

Let $\mathcal{C}$ and $\mathcal{D}$ be hereditary graph classes. Consider the following problem: given a graph $G\in\mathcal{D}$, find a largest, in terms of the number of vertices, induced subgraph of $G$ that belongs to $\mathcal{C}$. We prove that it can be solved in $2^{o(n)}$ time, where $n$ is the number of vertices of $G$, if the following conditions are satisfied: * the graphs in $\mathcal{C}$ are sparse, i.e., they have linearly many edges in terms of the number of vertices; * the graphs in $\mathcal{D}$ admit balanced separators of size governed by their density, e.g., $\mathcal{O}(\Delta)$ or $\mathcal{O}(\sqrt{m})$, where $\Delta$ and $m$ denote the maximum degree and the number of edges, respectively; and * the considered problem admits a single-exponential fixed-parameter algorithm when parameterized by the treewidth of the input graph. This leads, for example, to the following corollaries for specific classes $\mathcal{C}$ and $\mathcal{D}$: * a largest induced forest in a $P_t$-free graph can be found in $2^{\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(n^{2/3})}$ time, for every fixed $t$; and * a largest induced planar graph in a string graph can be found in $2^{\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(n^{3/4})}$ time., Comment: Appeared on IPEC 2019

The Planar Steiner Tree problem is one of the most fundamental NP-complete problems as it models many network design problems. Recall that an instance of this problem consists of a graph with edge weights, and a subset of vertices (often called terminals); the goal is to find a subtree of the graph of minimum total weight that connects all terminals. A seminal paper by Erickson et al. [Math. Oper. Res., 1987] considers instances where the underlying graph is planar and all terminals can be covered by the boundary of $k$ faces. Erickson et al. show that the problem can be solved by an algorithm using $n^{O(k)}$ time and $n^{O(k)}$ space, where $n$ denotes the number of vertices of the input graph. In the past 30 years there has been no significant improvement of this algorithm, despite several efforts. In this work, we give an algorithm for Planar Steiner Tree with running time $2^{O(k)} n^{O(\sqrt{k})}$ using only polynomial space. Furthermore, we show that the running time of our algorithm is almost tight: we prove that there is no $f(k)n^{o(\sqrt{k})}$ algorithm for Planar Steiner Tree for any computable function $f$, unless the Exponential Time Hypothesis fails., Comment: 32 pages, 8 figures, accepted at SODA 2019

We show that Odd Cycle Transversal and Vertex Multiway Cut admit deterministic polynomial kernels when restricted to planar graphs and parameterized by the solution size. This answers a question of Saurabh. On the way to these results, we provide an efficient sparsification routine in the flavor of the sparsification routine used for the Steiner Tree problem in planar graphs (FOCS 2014). It differs from the previous work because it preserves the existence of low-cost subgraphs that are not necessarily Steiner trees in the original plane graph, but structures that turn into (supergraphs of) Steiner trees after adding all edges between pairs of vertices that lie on a common face. We also show connections between Vertex Multiway Cut and the Vertex Planarization problem, where the existence of a polynomial kernel remains an important open problem.

A fundamental graph problem is to recognize whether the vertex set of a graph $G$ can be bipartitioned into sets $A$ and $B$ such that $G[A]$ and $G[B]$ satisfy properties $\Pi_A$ and $\Pi_B$, respectively. This so-called $(\Pi_A,\Pi_B)$-Recognition problem generalizes amongst others the recognition of $3$-colorable, bipartite, split, and monopolar graphs. In this paper, we study whether certain fixed-parameter tractable $(\Pi_A,\Pi_B)$-Recognition problems admit polynomial kernels. In our study, we focus on the first level above triviality, where $\Pi_A$ is the set of $P_3$-free graphs (disjoint unions of cliques, or cluster graphs), the parameter is the number of clusters in the cluster graph $G[A]$, and $\Pi_B$ is characterized by a set $\mathcal{H}$ of connected forbidden induced subgraphs. We prove that, under the assumption that NP is not a subset of coNP/poly, \textsc{$(\Pi_A,\Pi_B)$-Recognition} admits a polynomial kernel if and only if $\mathcal{H}$ contains a graph with at most $2$ vertices. In both the kernelization and the lower bound results, we exploit the properties of a pushing process, which is an algorithmic technique used recently by Heggerness et al. and by Kanj et al. to obtain fixed-parameter algorithms for many cases of $(\Pi_A,\Pi_B)$-Recognition, as well as several other problems., Comment: Full version of the corresponding article in the Proceedings of the 26th Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA '18), 35 pages, 7 figures

We consider two optimization problems in planar graphs. In Maximum Weight Independent Set of Objects we are given a graph $G$ and a family $\mathcal{D}$ of objects, each being a connected subgraph of $G$ with a prescribed weight, and the task is to find a maximum-weight subfamily of $\mathcal{D}$ consisting of pairwise disjoint objects. In Minimum Weight Distance Set Cover we are given an edge-weighted graph $G$, two sets $\mathcal{D},\mathcal{C}$ of vertices of $G$, where vertices of $\mathcal{D}$ have prescribed weights, and a nonnegative radius $r$. The task is to find a minimum-weight subset of $\mathcal{D}$ such that every vertex of $\mathcal{C}$ is at distance at most $r$ from some selected vertex. Via simple reductions, these two problems generalize a number of geometric optimization tasks, notably Maximum Weight Independent Set for polygons in the plane and Weighted Geometric Set Cover for unit disks and unit squares. We present quasi-polynomial time approximation schemes (QPTASs) for both of the above problems in planar graphs: given an accuracy parameter $\epsilon>0$ we can compute a solution whose weight is within multiplicative factor of $(1+\epsilon)$ from the optimum in time $2^{\mathrm{poly}(1/\epsilon,\log |\mathcal{D}|)}\cdot n^{\mathcal{O}(1)}$, where $n$ is the number of vertices of the input graph. Our main technical contribution is to transfer the techniques used for recursive approximation schemes for geometric problems due to Adamaszek, Har-Peled, and Wiese to the setting of planar graphs. In particular, this yields a purely combinatorial viewpoint on these methods., Comment: 31 pages, 5 figures, accepted at ESA 2018

In this paper, we consider tree decompositions, branch decompositions, and clique decompositions. We improve the running time of dynamic programming algorithms on these graph decompositions for a large number of problems as a function of the treewidth, branchwidth, or cliquewidth, respectively. On tree decompositions of width $k$, we improve the running time for Dominating Set to $O(3^k)$. We generalise this result to $[\rho,\sigma]$-domination problems with finite or cofinite $\rho$ and $\sigma$. For these problems, we give $O(s^k)$-time algorithms, where $s$ is the number of `states' a vertex can have in a standard dynamic programming algorithm for such a problems. Furthermore, we give an $O(2^k)$-time algorithm for counting the number of perfect matchings in a graph, and generalise this to $O(2^k)$-time algorithms for many clique covering, packing, and partitioning problems. On branch decompositions of width $k$, we give an $O(3^{\frac{\omega}{2}k})$-time algorithm for Dominating Set, an $O(2^{\frac{\omega}{2}k})$-time algorithm for counting the number of perfect matchings, and $O(s^{\frac{\omega}{2}k})$-time algorithms for $[\rho,\sigma]$-domination problems involving $s$ states with finite or cofinite $\rho$ and $\sigma$. Finally, on clique decompositions of width $k$, we give $O(4^k)$-time algorithms for Dominating Set, Independent Dominating Set, and Total Dominating Set. The main techniques used in this paper are a generalisation of fast subset convolution, as introduced by Bj\"orklund et al., now applied in the setting of graph decompositions and augmented such that multiple states and multiple ranks can be used. Recently, Lokshtanov et al. have shown that some of the algorithms obtained in this paper have running times in which the base in the exponents is optimal, unless the Strong Exponential-Time Hypothesis fails., Comment: Preliminary parts of this paper have appeared under the title `Dynamic Programming on Tree Decompositions Using Generalised Fast Subset Convolution' on the 17th Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2009), and under the title `Faster Algorithms on Branch and Clique Decompositions' on the 35th International Symposium Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2010)

In algorithmic graph theory, a classic open question is to determine the complexity of the Maximum Independent Set problem on $P_t$-free graphs, that is, on graphs not containing any induced path on $t$ vertices. So far, polynomial-time algorithms are known only for $t\le 5$ [Lokshtanov et al., SODA 2014, 570--581, 2014], and an algorithm for $t=6$ announced recently [Grzesik et al. Arxiv 1707.05491, 2017]. Here we study the existence of subexponential-time algorithms for the problem: we show that for any $t\ge 1$, there is an algorithm for Maximum Independent Set on $P_t$-free graphs whose running time is subexponential in the number of vertices. Even for the weighted version MWIS, the problem is solvable in $2^{O(\sqrt {tn \log n})}$ time on $P_t$-free graphs. For approximation of MIS in broom-free graphs, a similar time bound is proved. Scattered Set is the generalization of Maximum Independent Set where the vertices of the solution are required to be at distance at least $d$ from each other. We give a complete characterization of those graphs $H$ for which $d$-Scattered Set on $H$-free graphs can be solved in time subexponential in the size of the input (that is, in the number of vertices plus the number of edges): If every component of $H$ is a path, then $d$-Scattered Set on $H$-free graphs with $n$ vertices and $m$ edges can be solved in time $2^{O(|V(H)|\sqrt{n+m}\log (n+m))}$, even if $d$ is part of the input. Otherwise, assuming the Exponential-Time Hypothesis (ETH), there is no $2^{o(n+m)}$-time algorithm for $d$-Scattered Set for any fixed $d\ge 3$ on $H$-free graphs with $n$-vertices and $m$-edges., Comment: A preliminary version of the paper, with weaker results and only a subset of authors, appeared in the proceedings of IPEC 2016

A disconnected cut of a connected graph is a vertex cut that itself also induces a disconnected subgraph. The decision problem whether a graph has a disconnected cut is called Disconnected Cut. This problem is closely related to several homomorphism and contraction problems, and fits in an extensive line of research on vertex cuts with additional properties. It is known that Disconnected Cut is NP-hard on general graphs, while polynomial-time algorithms are known for several graph classes. However, the complexity of the problem on claw-free graphs remained an open question. Its connection to the complexity of the problem to contract a claw-free graph to the 4-vertex cycle $C_4$ led Ito et al. (TCS 2011) to explicitly ask to resolve this open question. We prove that Disconnected Cut is polynomial-time solvable on claw-free graphs, answering the question of Ito et al. The centerpiece of our result is a novel decomposition theorem for claw-free graphs of diameter 2, which we believe is of independent interest and expands the research line initiated by Chudnovsky and Seymour (JCTB 2007-2012) and Hermelin et al. (ICALP 2011). On our way to exploit this decomposition theorem, we characterize how disconnected cuts interact with certain cobipartite subgraphs, and prove two further novel algorithmic results, namely Disconnected Cut is polynomial-time solvable on circular-arc graphs and line graphs.

A well-studied coloring problem is to assign colors to the edges of a graph $G$ so that, for every pair of vertices, all edges of at least one shortest path between them receive different colors. The minimum number of colors necessary in such a coloring is the strong rainbow connection number ($\src(G)$) of the graph. When proving upper bounds on $\src(G)$, it is natural to prove that a coloring exists where, for \emph{every} shortest path between every pair of vertices in the graph, all edges of the path receive different colors. Therefore, we introduce and formally define this more restricted edge coloring number, which we call \emph{very strong rainbow connection number} ($\vsrc(G)$). In this paper, we give upper bounds on $\vsrc(G)$ for several graph classes, some of which are tight. These immediately imply new upper bounds on $\src(G)$ for these classes, showing that the study of $\vsrc(G)$ enables meaningful progress on bounding $\src(G)$. Then we study the complexity of the problem to compute $\vsrc(G)$, particularly for graphs of bounded treewidth, and show this is an interesting problem in its own right. We prove that $\vsrc(G)$ can be computed in polynomial time on cactus graphs; in contrast, this question is still open for $\src(G)$. We also observe that deciding whether $\vsrc(G) = k$ is fixed-parameter tractable in $k$ and the treewidth of $G$. Finally, on general graphs, we prove that there is no polynomial-time algorithm to decide whether $\vsrc(G) \leq 3$ nor to approximate $\vsrc(G)$ within a factor $n^{1-\varepsilon}$, unless P$=$NP.

A graph $G$ is a $(\Pi_A,\Pi_B)$-graph if $V(G)$ can be bipartitioned into $A$ and $B$ such that $G[A]$ satisfies property $\Pi_A$ and $G[B]$ satisfies property $\Pi_B$. The $(\Pi_{A},\Pi_{B})$-Recognition problem is to recognize whether a given graph is a $(\Pi_A,\Pi_B)$-graph. There are many $(\Pi_{A},\Pi_{B})$-Recognition problems, including the recognition problems for bipartite, split, and unipolar graphs. We present efficient algorithms for many cases of $(\Pi_A,\Pi_B)$-Recognition based on a technique which we dub inductive recognition. In particular, we give fixed-parameter algorithms for two NP-hard $(\Pi_{A},\Pi_{B})$-Recognition problems, Monopolar Recognition and 2-Subcoloring. We complement our algorithmic results with several hardness results for $(\Pi_{A},\Pi_{B})$-Recognition., Comment: A preliminary version of this paper appears in the proceedings of SWAT 2016. A journal version of this paper appears in Journal of Computer and System Sciences, volume 92, 2018. This ArXiv paper additionally discusses relations to the iterative localization technique (Heggernes et al., Information and Computation, 2013)

Consider the Maximum Weight Independent Set problem for rectangles: given a family of weighted axis-parallel rectangles in the plane, find a maximum-weight subset of non-overlapping rectangles. The problem is notoriously hard both in the approximation and in the parameterized setting. The best known polynomial-time approximation algorithms achieve super-constant approximation ratios [Chalermsook and Chuzhoy, SODA 2009; Chan and Har-Peled, Discrete & Comp. Geometry 2012], even though there is a $(1+\epsilon)$-approximation running in quasi-polynomial time [Adamaszek and Wiese, FOCS 2013; Chuzhoy and Ene, FOCS 2016]. When parameterized by the target size of the solution, the problem is $\mathsf{W}[1]$-hard even in the unweighted setting [Marx, FOCS 2007]. To achieve tractability, we study the following shrinking model: one is allowed to shrink each input rectangle by a multiplicative factor $1-\delta$ for some fixed $\delta>0$, but the performance is still compared against the optimal solution for the original, non-shrunk instance. We prove that in this regime, the problem admits an EPTAS with running time $f(\epsilon,\delta)\cdot n^{\mathcal{O}(1)}$, and an FPT algorithm with running time $f(k,\delta)\cdot n^{\mathcal{O}(1)}$, in the setting where a maximum-weight solution of size at most $k$ is to be computed. This improves and significantly simplifies a PTAS given earlier for this problem [Adamaszek et al., APPROX 2015], and provides the first parameterized results for the shrinking model. Furthermore, we explore kernelization in the shrinking model, by giving efficient kernelization procedures for several variants of the problem when the input rectangles are squares., Comment: 25 pages, 2 figures