Search

Your search keyword '"van Veldhuizen, Harriët"' showing total 15 results
Start Over Author "van Veldhuizen, Harriët"
15 results on '"van Veldhuizen, Harriët"'

1. Incidence of Interval Colorectal Cancer After Negative Results From First-Round Fecal Immunochemical Screening Tests, by Cutoff Value and Participant Sex and Age

Author

van der Beek, A., Otte, J.A., Wiersma, Tj., Masclee, A.A.M., van Bergeijk, J., Meijer, G., de Graaf, E.J.R., van Grevenstein, W.M.U., Frasa, M., Jacobs, L.H.J., Stoker, J., Vink, G., Elferink, M.A., Toes-Zoutendijk, Esther, Kooyker, Arthur I., Dekker, Evelien, Spaander, Manon C.W., Opstal-van Winden, Annemieke W.J., Ramakers, Christian, Buskermolen, Maaike, van Vuuren, Anneke J., Kuipers, Ernst J., van Kemenade, Folkert J., Velthuysen, Marie-Louise F., Thomeer, Maarten G.J., van Veldhuizen, Harriët, van Ballegooijen, Marjolein, Nagtegaal, Iris D., de Koning, Harry J., van Leerdam, Monique E., and Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris

Published
2020
Full Text
View/download PDF

2. Real-Time Monitoring of Results During First Year of Dutch Colorectal Cancer Screening Program and Optimization by Altering Fecal Immunochemical Test Cut-Off Levels

Author

Schipper, D.L., Masclee, A.A.M., Wiersma, T.J., Otte, J.A., van der Beek, A., van Kemenade, F.J., Stoker, J., den Heeten, G.J., de Graaf, E.J.R., van Grevenstein, W.M.U., Kluiters, Y.C.M., Blankenstein, M.A., Toes-Zoutendijk, Esther, van Leerdam, Monique E., Dekker, Evelien, van Hees, Frank, Penning, Corine, Nagtegaal, Iris, van der Meulen, Miriam P., van Vuuren, Anneke J., Kuipers, Ernst J., Bonfrer, Johannes M.G., Biermann, Katharina, Thomeer, Maarten G.J., van Veldhuizen, Harriët, Kroep, Sonja, van Ballegooijen, Marjolein, Meijer, Gerrit A., de Koning, Harry J., Spaander, Manon C.W., and Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris

Published
2017
Full Text
View/download PDF

3. Socioeconomic differences in participation and diagnostic yield within the Dutch national colorectal cancer screening programme with faecal immunochemical testing

Author

van der Meulen, Miriam P., Toes-Zoutendijk, Esther, Spaander, Manon C.W., Dekker, Evelien, Bonfrer, Johannes M.G., van Vuuren, Anneke J., Kuipers, Ernst J., van Kemenade, Folkert J., van Velthuysen, M. F., Thomeer, Maarten G.J., van Veldhuizen, Harriët, de Koning, Harry J., Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris, van Leerdam, Monique E., van der Meulen, Miriam P., Toes-Zoutendijk, Esther, Spaander, Manon C.W., Dekker, Evelien, Bonfrer, Johannes M.G., van Vuuren, Anneke J., Kuipers, Ernst J., van Kemenade, Folkert J., van Velthuysen, M. F., Thomeer, Maarten G.J., van Veldhuizen, Harriët, de Koning, Harry J., Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris, and van Leerdam, Monique E.

Abstract

Background CRC mortality rates are higher for individuals with a lower socioeconomic status (SES). Screening could influence health inequalities. We therefore aimed to investigate SES differences in participation and diagnostic yield of FIT screening. Methods All invitees in 2014 and 2015 in the Dutch national CRC screening programme were included in the analyses. We used area SES as a measure for SES and divided invitees into quintiles, with Quintile 1 being the highest SES. Logistic regression analysis was used to compare the participation rate, positivity rate, colonoscopy uptake, positive predictive value (PPV) and detection rate across the SES groups. Results Participation to FIT screening was significantly lower for Quintile 5 (67.0%) compared to the other Quintiles (73.0% to 75.1%; adjusted OR quintile 5 versus quintile 1: 0.73, 95%CI: 0.72–0.74), as well as colonoscopy uptake after a positive FIT (adjusted OR 0.73, 95%CI: 0.69–0.77). The detection rate per FIT participant for advanced neoplasia gradually increased from 3.3% in Quintile 1 to 4.0% in Quintile 5 (adjusted OR 1.20%, 95%CI 1.16–1.24). As a result of lower participation, the yield per invitee was similar for Quintile 5 (2.04%) and Quintile 1 (2.00%), both being lower than Quintiles 2 to 4 (2.20%-2.28%). Conclusions Screening has the potential to reduce health inequalities in CRC mortality, because of a higher detection in participants with a lower SES. However, in the Dutch screening programme, this is currently offset by the lower participation in this group.

Published
2022

4. Socioeconomic differences in participation and diagnostic yield within the Dutch national colorectal cancer screening programme with faecal immunochemical testing

Author

van der Meulen, Miriam P., primary, Toes-Zoutendijk, Esther, additional, Spaander, Manon C. W., additional, Dekker, Evelien, additional, Bonfrer, Johannes M. G., additional, van Vuuren, Anneke J., additional, Kuipers, Ernst J., additional, van Kemenade, Folkert J., additional, van Velthuysen, M. F., additional, Thomeer, Maarten G. J., additional, van Veldhuizen, Harriët, additional, de Koning, Harry J., additional, Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris, additional, and van Leerdam, Monique E., additional

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

6. Incidence of Interval Colorectal Cancer After Negative Results From First-Round Fecal Immunochemical Screening Tests, by Cutoff Value and Participant Sex and Age

Author

Toes-Zoutendijk, Esther, primary, Kooyker, Arthur I., additional, Dekker, Evelien, additional, Spaander, Manon C.W., additional, Opstal-van Winden, Annemieke W.J., additional, Ramakers, Christian, additional, Buskermolen, Maaike, additional, van Vuuren, Anneke J., additional, Kuipers, Ernst J., additional, van Kemenade, Folkert J., additional, Velthuysen, Marie-Louise F., additional, Thomeer, Maarten G.J., additional, van Veldhuizen, Harriët, additional, van Ballegooijen, Marjolein, additional, Nagtegaal, Iris D., additional, de Koning, Harry J., additional, van Leerdam, Monique E., additional, Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris, additional, van der Beek, A., additional, Otte, J.A., additional, Wiersma, Tj., additional, Masclee, A.A.M., additional, van Bergeijk, J., additional, Meijer, G., additional, de Graaf, E.J.R., additional, van Grevenstein, W.M.U., additional, Frasa, M., additional, Jacobs, L.H.J., additional, Stoker, J., additional, Vink, G., additional, and Elferink, M.A., additional

Published
2020
Full Text
View/download PDF

7. 90 – Post-Colonoscopy Mortality in a Fit-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Program

Author

Kooyker, Arthur I., primary, Toes-Zoutendijk, Esther, additional, Winden, Annemieke Opstal-van, additional, Spaander, Manon, additional, Dekker, Evelien, additional, Buskermolen, Maaike, additional, van Vuuren, Anneke, additional, Kuipers, Ernst J., additional, van Kemenade, Folkert J., additional, van Veldhuizen, Harriët, additional, Thomeer, Maarten G., additional, Nagtegaal, Iris D., additional, Ramakers, Christian, additional, van Ballegooijen, Marjolein, additional, De Koning, Harry, additional, Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris, additional, and van Leerdam, Monique, additional

Published
2019
Full Text
View/download PDF

8. 91 – Interval Cancers After a Negative Faecal Immunochemical Test in the First Screening Round in the Netherlands for Two Cut-Off Levels

Author

Toes-Zoutendijk, Esther, primary, Kooyker, Arthur I., additional, Dekker, Evelien, additional, Spaander, Manon, additional, Winden, Annemieke Opstal-van, additional, Ramakers, Christian, additional, Buskermolen, Maaike, additional, van Vuuren, Anneke, additional, Kuipers, Ernst J., additional, van Kemenade, Folkert J., additional, van Velthuysen, Marie-Louise F., additional, Thomeer, Maarten G., additional, van Veldhuizen, Harriët, additional, Nagtegaal, Iris D., additional, De Koning, Harry, additional, van Leerdam, Monique, additional, and Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris, additional

Published
2019
Full Text
View/download PDF

9. Quality Monitoring of a FIT-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Program

Author

Toes-Zoutendijk, Esther, primary, Bonfrer, Johannes M G, primary, Ramakers, Christian, primary, Thelen, Marc, primary, Spaander, Manon C W, primary, Dekker, Evelien, primary, van der Meulen, Miriam P, primary, Buskermolen, Maaike, primary, van Vuuren, Anneke J, primary, Kuipers, Ernst J, primary, van Kemenade, Folkert J, primary, van Velthuysen, Marie-Louise F, primary, Thomeer, Maarten G J, primary, van Veldhuizen, Harriët, primary, van Ballegooijen, Marjolein, primary, de Koning, Harry J, primary, van Leerdam, Monique E, primary, and Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris, primary

Published
2019
Full Text
View/download PDF

10. Landelijke monitoring en evaluatie van het bevolkingsonderzoek naar darmkanker in Nederland 2014-2017:Het eerste evaluatierapport

Author

Opstal-van Winden, Annemieke W.J., Kooyker, Arthur, Zoutendijk, Esther, Buskermolen, Maaike, Spaander, Manon, Dekker, Evelien, van Vuuren, Hanneke, van Kemenade, Folkert, Ramakers, Christian, Nagtegaal, Iris D., van Veldhuizen, Harriët, Thomeer, Maarten, van Velthuysen, Marie-Louise, van Ballegooijen, Marjolein, Bonfrer, Hans M.G., de Koning, Harry, Kuipers, Ernst, van Leerdam, Monique E., Vogelaar, Iris, Opstal-van Winden, Annemieke W.J., Kooyker, Arthur, Zoutendijk, Esther, Buskermolen, Maaike, Spaander, Manon, Dekker, Evelien, van Vuuren, Hanneke, van Kemenade, Folkert, Ramakers, Christian, Nagtegaal, Iris D., van Veldhuizen, Harriët, Thomeer, Maarten, van Velthuysen, Marie-Louise, van Ballegooijen, Marjolein, Bonfrer, Hans M.G., de Koning, Harry, Kuipers, Ernst, van Leerdam, Monique E., and Vogelaar, Iris

Published
2019

11. Su1736 - Results of the Dutch Fit-Based Colorectal Screening Program in 2016: Impact of Increasing the Cut-off Level on Participation and Yield in the Second Round

Author

Kooyker, Arthur I., primary, Toes-Zoutendijk, Esther, additional, Spaander, Manon, additional, Dekker, Evelien, additional, Buskermolen, Maaike, additional, Kuipers, Ernst J., additional, Nagtegaal, Iris D., additional, Ramakers, Christian, additional, van Veldhuizen, Harriët, additional, van Ballegooijen, Marjolein, additional, De Koning, Harry, additional, van Vuuren, Anneke, additional, van Kemenade, Folkert J., additional, van Velthuysen, Marie-Louise F., additional, Thomeer, Maarten G., additional, van Leerdam, Monique, additional, and Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris, additional

Published
2018
Full Text
View/download PDF

12. Real-Time Monitoring of Results During First Year of Dutch Colorectal Cancer Screening Program and Optimization by Altering Fecal Immunochemical Test Cut-Off Levels

Author

Toes-Zoutendijk, Esther, primary, van Leerdam, Monique E., additional, Dekker, Evelien, additional, van Hees, Frank, additional, Penning, Corine, additional, Nagtegaal, Iris, additional, van der Meulen, Miriam P., additional, van Vuuren, Anneke J., additional, Kuipers, Ernst J., additional, Bonfrer, Johannes M.G., additional, Biermann, Katharina, additional, Thomeer, Maarten G.J., additional, van Veldhuizen, Harriët, additional, Kroep, Sonja, additional, van Ballegooijen, Marjolein, additional, Meijer, Gerrit A., additional, de Koning, Harry J., additional, Spaander, Manon C.W., additional, Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris, additional, Schipper, D.L., additional, Masclee, A.A.M., additional, Wiersma, T.J., additional, Otte, J.A., additional, van der Beek, A., additional, van Kemenade, F.J., additional, Stoker, J., additional, den Heeten, G.J., additional, de Graaf, E.J.R., additional, van Grevenstein, W.M.U., additional, Kluiters, Y.C.M., additional, and Blankenstein, M.A., additional

Published
2017
Full Text
View/download PDF

13. The value of models in informing resource allocation in colorectal cancer screening – 1 the case of the Netherlands

Author

van Hees, Frank, Zauber, Ann G., van Veldhuizen, Harriët, Heijnen, Marie-Louise A., Penning, Corine, de Koning, Harry J., van Ballegooijen, Marjolein, and Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris

Subjects
Occult Blood, Humans, Program Development, Colorectal Neoplasms, Article, Early Detection of Cancer, Decision Support Techniques, Netherlands, Resource Allocation
Abstract

In May 2011, the Dutch government decided to implement a national programme for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening using biennial faecal immunochemical test (FIT) screening between ages 55 and 75.[1] Decision modelling played an important role in informing this decision, as well as in the planning and implementation of the programme afterwards. In this overview, we illustrate the value of models in informing resource allocation in CRC screening, using the role that decision modelling has played in the Dutch CRC screening programme as an example.

Published
2015

14. Mo1706 Optimizing Screening Programs by Real-Time Monitoring: Outcomes of the National Colorectal Cancer FIT-Based Screening Program of the Netherlands

Author

Toes-Zoutendijk, Esther, primary, van Leerdam, Monique, additional, Dekker, Evelien, additional, van Hees, Frank, additional, van Kemenade, Folkert, additional, van der Meulen, Miriam P., additional, van Vuuren, Anneke, additional, Kuipers, Ernst J., additional, Bonfrer, Johannes M.G., additional, Biermann, Katharina, additional, Thomeer, Maarten, additional, van Veldhuizen, Harriët, additional, de Koning, Harry, additional, Spaander, Manon, additional, and Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris, additional

Published
2016
Full Text
View/download PDF

15. [Faecal occult blood test for colorectal cancer screening: high quality for a good price].

Author

van Veldhuizen H, Bonfrer JM, and Kuipers EJ

Subjects
Adenoma diagnosis, Adenoma economics, Adenoma prevention & control, Colonoscopy, Colorectal Neoplasms economics, Colorectal Neoplasms prevention & control, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Humans, Mass Screening methods, Colorectal Neoplasms diagnosis, Early Detection of Cancer economics, Early Detection of Cancer standards, Occult Blood
Abstract

The Dutch National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) awarded the immunochemical faecal occult blood test (IFOBT) to FOB Gold of Sentinel following a European call for tenders. The contract-awarding procedure included the application of quality knock-out criteria, which were met by two suppliers. The decisive factor was the best price/quality ratio. A recent review indicated that, at present, no single IFOBT is better than any other. The decision to opt for a test manufactured by a different supplier than was used in the previous screening pilots made it necessary to re-determine the cut-off value. This value has now been set (88 ng/ml) and is confirmed by a laboratory test. Colonoscopy-related capacity planning, as well as its diagnostic yield, depends on numerous factors; therefore, the RIVM is currently monitoring the referral percentage and number of adenomas detected and is collaborating on quality terms. Any necessary adjustments are to be made during the introduction of the screening test.

Published
2013

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results