1. Content Validity of the Modified Functional Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (f-SARA) Instrument in Spinocerebellar Ataxia.
- Author
-
Potashman, Michele, Rudell, Katja, Pavisic, Ivanna, Suminski, Naomi, Doma, Rinchen, Heinrich, Maggie, Abetz-Webb, Linda, Beiner, Melissa, Kuo, Sheng-Han, Rosenthal, Liana, Zesiwicz, Theresa, Fife, Terry, van de Warrenburg, Bart, Ristori, Giovanni, Synofzik, Matthis, Perlman, Susan, Schmahmann, Jeremy, and LItalien, Gilbert
- Subjects
Clinical outcome assessment ,Cognitive debriefing ,Concept elicitation ,Spinocerebellar ataxia ,f-SARA ,Humans ,Spinocerebellar Ataxias ,Male ,Female ,Middle Aged ,Adult ,Severity of Illness Index ,Reproducibility of Results ,Aged ,Gait ,Disease Progression - Abstract
The functional Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (f-SARA) assesses Gait, Stance, Sitting, and Speech. It was developed as a potentially clinically meaningful measure of spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA) progression for clinical trial use. Here, we evaluated content validity of the f-SARA. Qualitative interviews were conducted among individuals with SCA1 (n = 1) and SCA3 (n = 6) and healthcare professionals (HCPs) with SCA expertise (USA, n = 5; Europe, n = 3). Interviews evaluated symptoms and signs of SCA and relevance of f-SARA concepts for SCA. HCP cognitive debriefing was conducted. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, coded, and analyzed by ATLAS.TI software. Individuals with SCA1 and 3 reported 85 symptoms, signs, and impacts of SCA. All indicated difficulties with walking, stance, balance, speech, fatigue, emotions, and work. All individuals with SCA1 and 3 considered Gait, Stance, and Speech relevant f-SARA concepts; 3 considered Sitting relevant (42.9%). All HCPs considered Gait and Speech relevant; 5 (62.5%) indicated Stance was relevant. Sitting was considered a late-stage disease indicator. Most HCPs suggested inclusion of appendicular items would enhance clinical relevance. Cognitive debriefing supported clarity and comprehension of f-SARA. Maintaining current abilities on f-SARA items for 1 year was considered meaningful for most individuals with SCA1 and 3. All HCPs considered meaningful changes as stability in f-SARA score over 1-2 years, 1-2-point change in total f-SARA score, and deviation from natural history. These results support content validity of f-SARA for assessing SCA disease progression in clinical trials.
- Published
- 2024