Search

Background: Radiation associated angiosarcoma (RAAS) of the breast is a rare malignancy with poor survival. Optimal treatment strategies remain uncertain due to a lack of data, and vary between surgery alone and a combination of surgery with (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and/or re-irradiation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential benefit of taxane based NACT., Methods: In this retrospective single center study, all patients with RAAS of the breast treated between 1994 and 2024 are included. Since 2018, NACT is considered a treatment option for this patient population in our institute. The difference in oncological outcomes of patients with and without NACT were compared., Results: Thirty-five women were included. Thirteen (37 %) received NACT of which five (39 %) also had neoadjuvant re-irradiation with hyperthermia. Eleven patients (85 %) received paclitaxel, the other two (15 %) had doxorubicine/docetaxel. Complete pathological response was found in 69 % (n = 9). Median follow up was 41 months (range 24-56) for patients with NACT and 44 (range 20-108) for patients without NACT. In the NACT group, only one patient developed a recurrence after 6.5 years. Patients with NACT had improved oncological outcomes compared to patients without NACT in terms of 3-year local recurrence free survival (100% vs. 63.9 %, p = 0.14), distant metastasis free survival (100 % vs. 47.5 %, p = 0.005), and overall survival (100% vs. 56.1 %, p = 0.016)., Conclusion: In this study, neoadjuvant taxanes for RAAS of the breast leads to improved distant metastasis free survival and overal survival in patients treated with NACT compared to no NACT., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest N. Steeghs provided consultation or attended advisory boards for Boehringer Ingelheim, Ellipses Pharma, GlaxoSmithKline, Incyte, Luszana. N Steeghs received research grants from Abbvie, Actuate Therapeutics, Amgen, Array, Ascendis Pharma, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Blueprint Medicines, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Cantargia, CellCentric, Cogent Biosciences, Cresecendo Biologics, Cytovation, Deciphera, Dragonfly, Eli Lilly, Exelixis, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, IDRx, Immunocore, Incyte, InteRNA, Janssen, Kinnate Biopharma, Kling Biotherapeutics, Lixte, Luszana, Merck, Merck Sharp & DohmeMerck Sharp & Dohme, Merus, Molecular Partners, Navire Pharma, Novartis, Numab Therapeutics, Pfizer, Relay Pharmaceuticals, Revolution Medicin, Roche, Sanofi, Seattle Genetics, Taiho, Takeda. All outside the submitted work, all payment to the Netherlands Cancer Institute. W. van der Graaf: Advisory boards SpringworkTx, Agenus and PTC Therapeutics (all to the institute) and research grants from Eli Lilly (to the Institute). W. van Houdt: advisory boards of Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Sanofi, Novartis, Sirius Pintuition, Belpharma. All payment to the Netherlands Cancer Institute., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Background: Localization of non-palpable melanoma, Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) and soft tissue sarcoma (STS) lesions can be difficult due to size, location, and obesity of patients or fibrosis due to previous treatments. Magnetic seed localization (MSL) is a common method to localize non-palpable breast lesions, but the feasibility of MSL for non-palpable melanoma, MCC and STS lesions has not yet been described., Methods: In this retrospective single center cohort study, all consecutive patients between January 2021 and October 2023 who had a resection of a non-palpable melanoma, MCC or STS lesion guided by Sirius Pintuition, a MSL technique, were included. The primary endpoint was successful lesion localization during surgery and the secondary endpoints were seed migration, negative resection margins, and complications., Results: Seventy-nine seeds were placed for 76 lesions, which were resected during 68 surgeries in 61 patients. All lesions (100 %) were localized and resected. Median time of surgery was 44 min. No seed migration was observed. A negative resection margin was achieved for 60 (78.9 %) lesions. Clavien Dindo grade ≥2 complications occurred in 7.4 %., Conclusion: Magnetic seed localization with Sirius Pintuition is feasible for both non-palpable melanoma, MCC, and STS lesions., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: WJ Van Houdt reports financial support was provided by Sirius Medical Systems B.V. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.)

Internal herniation (IH) is a common problem after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery (RYGB). Routine closure of the mesenteric defects (MDs) reduces the risk of IH. Only very few articles report on risk factors for IH or describe detailed closing techniques. There is no consensus yet on the best closing method. The objective of this study is to determine the optimal stapling method for closure of MDs after RYGB. All performed RYGB procedures in our high-volume bariatric institute were included. Quality of the closure was scored in the categories poor, sub-optimal, and optimal, to see if the quality of the closure would predict the chance of reopening of the MDs and, therefore, the chance of IH. During any type of laparoscopy in the follow-up of the patient, the conditions of the MDs were stated, for example during diagnostic laparoscopy in symptomatic patients suspicious for IH or during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Technically well-executed closure of Petersen's space (PS) with two rows of staples had a greater chance of still being closed upon re-inspection compared to closure with one row (odds ratio = 8.1; 95% confidence interval [1.2-53.2], p = 0.029). Optimal closure of the MD at the jejuno-jejunostomy (JJ-space, JJS) resulted in more closed JJSs upon re-inspection compared to sub-optimal closure (odds ratio = 3.6 [CI 95% 0.8-16.1], p = 0.099). Non-optimally closed MDs had higher reopening rates and, therefore, pose an additional risk for IH. Our classification provides a quality assessment of MD closure during RYGB and gives insight into how to optimize surgical technique., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Neoadjuvant imatinib is considered for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) when decreased tumor size provides less extensive surgery and higher R0 resection rates. This study evaluates the effectivity and safety of neoadjuvant imatinib for large or locally advanced GIST., Patients and Methods: From the prospective database of the Dutch GIST Consortium, all patients who underwent surgery after neoadjuvant imatinib at our center between 2009 and 2022 were selected. Independent and blinded assessment of surgical strategy was performed by two surgeons, based on anonymized computed tomography (CT) scans before and after neoadjuvant imatinib., Results: Of 113 patients that received neoadjuvant imatinib, 108 (95%) [mean age 61.6, standard deviation (SD) 11.5, 54% male] underwent a GIST resection. Of all GISTs, 67% was localized in the stomach and 25% in the duodenum or small intestine. In 74% of the patients with GIST, a KIT exon 11 mutation was found. Decreased tumor size was seen in 95 (88%) patients. Having a KIT exon 11 mutation [odds ratio (OR) 5.64, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.67-19.1, p < 0.01] or not having a mutation (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.04-0.89, p = 0.04) were positive and negative predictive values for partial response, respectively. In 55 (51%) patients, there was deescalation of surgical strategy after neoadjuvant imatinib. Surgical complications were documented in 16 (15%) patients (n = 8, grade II; n = 5, grade IIIa; n = 3, grade IIIb) and R0 resection was accomplished in 95 (89%) patients. The 5-year disease-free and overall survival were 80% and 91%, respectively., Conclusion: This study shows that neoadjuvant imatinib is effective and safe for patients with large or locally advanced GIST., (© 2023. Society of Surgical Oncology.)

Background: Neoadjuvant systemic therapy has shown promising results in the treatment of high-risk stage III melanoma; however, the effects on surgery are currently unknown. This study aims to compare the surgical outcomes, in terms of postoperative complications, postoperative morbidity, duration of surgery and textbook outcomes, of patients with high-risk stage III melanoma who received neoadjuvant systemic therapy followed by lymph node dissection with patients who received an upfront lymph node dissection., Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, patients with high-risk stage III melanoma treated with neoadjuvant anti-PD1 and anti-CTLA4 in the OpACIN (NCT02437279) and OpACIN-neo (NCT02977052) trial between October 2014 and August 2018 were included and compared to patients who received upfront surgery in the same time period., Results: A total of 120 patients were included in this study, of whom 44 received neoadjuvant systemic therapy and 76 underwent upfront surgery. There was no significant difference in the overall rate of postoperative complications between the neoadjuvant group and the upfront surgery group (31.8% versus 36.8%, p = 0.578) and neither in rate of postoperative morbidity (seroma 56.8% versus 57.9%, p = 0.908) (lymphedema 22.7% versus 13.2%, p = 0.175). There was a non-significant difference towards a slightly longer duration of surgery after neoadjuvant immunotherapy (105 versus 90 min, p = 0.077). There were no differences in textbook outcomes (50% versus 49%, p = 0.889)., Conclusion: This study shows that the surgical outcomes for patients who underwent a lymph node dissection after neoadjuvant systemic immunotherapy or underwent upfront lymph node dissection for high-risk stage III melanoma are comparable., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: AvA declares to have received advisory Board & Consultancy Honoraria: Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, MSD-Merck, Merck-Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Provectus, Sanofi, Sirius Medical, 4SC. Research Grants: Amgen, Merck-Pfizer. MW declares a research grant received from Novartis. WvH declares to have received advisory Board & Consultancy Honoraria for Amgen, Belpharma, Novartis, MSD-Merck, Sanofi. All unrelated to the current work under consideration. All remaining authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)