Search

Investigating the wind speed flow field and aerodynamic characteristics of shelterbelts with different structural features is of significant importance for the rational arrangement of shelterbelts and the mitigation of windblown sand disasters. Considering five cross-sectional shapes of shelterbelts (rectangle, windward right-angle triangle, leeward right-angle triangle, isosceles triangle, and parabolic) and four layout forms (single shelterbelt, L-shaped network, U-shaped network, and rectangular network), we conducted computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations using the large eddy simulation (LES) turbulence model to understand mean wind speed flow field and turbulence structure of shelterbelts with different structural features, and investigated the effects of shelterbelt cross-sectional shapes and layout forms on windbreak indicators, such as protection distance and area. We considered tree canopies as porous media and conducted simulation with the 'Tsujimatsu' shelterbelt in Japan with a total height (H) of 7 m, canopy height of 5.8 m, and a canopy base width of 2 m. The results showed that the average relative errors of mean wind speed and turbulent kinetic energy at different heights obtained by numerical simulations and field measurement were small, being 5.5% and 12%, respectively, indicating that the porous medium canopy model successfully reproduced the mean wind speed and turbulent kinetic energy in the leeward area of the shelter-belt. The rectangular cross-section shelterbelt, with the largest canopy volume, significantly obstructed airflow. The mean wind speed and turbulent kinetic energy showed a notable reduction in the leeward area near the shelterbelt, especially in the upper region (z ≥ 0.5H, where z denoted the height), showing the largest protection range. The parabolic cross-section shelterbelt ranked second in terms of protection range, followed by shelterbelts with windward right-angle, leeward right-angle, and isosceles triangular cross-sections. In the downstream area where horizontal distance x ≥ 10H, the mean wind speed and turbulent kinetic energy of shelterbelts with different cross-sectional shapes tended to be the same. Comparing the flow field structures of single shelterbelts and L-shaped, U-shaped, and rectangular networks, it revealed that the more shelterbelts oriented perpendicular to the incoming wind speed, the more pronounced the wind speed attenuation behind the canopy, a longer distance would be required for airflow to recover to the incoming wind speed. In contrast, the wind protection effect of shelterbelts paralleled to the wind direction was extremely limited, making the U-shaped and rectangular networks more effective in wind protection than single shelterbelts and L-shaped networks. The findings would provide references for the structural configuration and optimal layout of shelterbelt systems. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

[Objective] The characteristics of sand and dust transport amount and particle size on the windward and leeward sides of a natural Populus euphratica riparian forest at the Arghan section of the lower reaches of the Tarim River under the prevailing wind direction were studied in order to provide a theoretical basis for its windbreak and sand fixation capacity. [Methods] Sediments were collected from two windward sites (Y1 and Y2) and two leeward sites (B1 and B2) of the forest at five heights of 10, 30, 50, 100, and 150 cm near the surface using a BSNE sand collector. The particle size characteristics of the sand samples were then measured using a Microtrac S3500 laser diffraction particle size analyzer. [Results] ① The horizontal flux of sand and dust in the four sample plots followed either a power function or exponential function distribution, and total sediment transport followed the order of Y1 > Y2 > B1 > B2. The sediment transport for each sample plot decreased with increasing height from the soil surface. ② The reduction of sediment on the leeward side compared with the windward side ranged from 35% to 80% less than on the windward side, indicating that the natural P. euphratica riparian forest in the lower reaches of the Tarim River has obvious windbreak and sand fixation benefits. ③ The average particle size of sand grains at all heights was 80~93 μm, mainly composed of extremely fine sand. The particle size frequency curve showed a single peak distribution, and the sand dust composition was simple, mainly composed of local sand sources. [Conclusion] The sediment transport on the leeward side of the natural P. euphratica riparian forest in the study area was lower than that of the windward side. Average particle size was smaller and sorting performance was better on the leeward side than on windward side. The average particle size smaller than that of the windward side, the sorting was better than that of the windward side, the kurtosis was narrower than that of windward side, and skewness is slightly smaller than that of the windward side. The P. euphratica riparian forest exhibited obvious windbreak and sand fixation benefits, and can be used as an effective measure to reduce the damage by wind and sand transport in the study area.

Copyright of Bulletin of Soil & Water Conservation is the property of Bulletin of Soil & Water Conservation Editorial Office and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The farm-shelter forest network is a complex grid protection system, with a windbreak that is distinctly different from that of the single shelterbelt. We selected the farm-shelter forest network of a jujube field in the Tarim Basin of northwest China and used a combination of field measurements and wind tunnel tests to determine the optimal spacing interval between principal shelterbelts. The wind speed reductive curve of the farm-shelter forest network showed a gradual wind speed tendency to stability. Therefore, a model was established based on the energy transfer balance between the upper and the lower airflows for a steady wind speed. The prediction error of the model was found to be < 1%. The model results indicated that increasing the spacing interval between principal shelterbelts from 10 to 20 H, where H is the shelterbelt height, maintained more than 70% of the windbreak effect of the farm-shelter forest network. If the spacing interval between principal shelterbelts were to be increased from 10 to 20 H, the jujube planting area would be increased by 0.54%. Therefore, a thorough consideration of the windbreak effect of each shelterbelt, the synergistic effects of shelterbelts, the windbreak effects of tall crops, and the effects of temperature and humidity in farm-shelter forest networks indicates that increasing the spacing interval will not only maintain the windbreak effect, but it will also reduce the side effects of shelterbelts, increase the planting area, favor mechanized operation, and improve planting efficiency. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Investigating the wind speed flow field and aerodynamic characteristics of shelterbelts with different structural features is of significant importance for the rational arrangement of shelterbelts and the mitigation of wind-blown sand disasters. Considering five cross-sectional shapes of shelterbelts (rectangle, windward right-angle triangle, leeward right-angle triangle, isosceles triangle, and parabolic) and four layout forms (single shelterbelt, L-shaped network, U-shaped network, and rectangular network), we conducted computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations using the large eddy simulation (LES) turbulence model to understand mean wind speed flow field and turbulence structure of shelterbelts with different structural features, and investigated the effects of shelterbelt cross-sectional shapes and layout forms on windbreak indicators, such as protection distance and area. We considered tree canopies as porous media and conducted simulation with the 'Tsujimatsu' shelterbelt in Japan with a total height ( H ) of 7 m, canopy height of 5.8 m, and a canopy base width of 2 m. The results showed that the average relative errors of mean wind speed and turbulent kinetic energy at different heights obtained by numerical simulations and field measurement were small, being 5.5% and 12%, respectively, indicating that the porous medium canopy model successfully reproduced the mean wind speed and turbulent kinetic energy in the leeward area of the shelterbelt. The rectangular cross-section shelterbelt, with the largest canopy volume, significantly obstructed airflow. The mean wind speed and turbulent kinetic energy showed a notable reduction in the leeward area near the shelterbelt, especially in the upper region ( z ≥0.5 H , where z denoted the height), showing the largest protection range. The parabolic cross-section shelterbelt ranked second in terms of protection range, followed by shelterbelts with windward right-angle, leeward right-angle, and isosceles triangular cross-sections. In the downstream area where horizontal distance x ≥10 H , the mean wind speed and turbulent kinetic energy of shelterbelts with different cross-sectional shapes tended to be the same. Comparing the flow field structures of single shelterbelts and L-shaped, U-shaped, and rectangular networks, it revealed that the more shelterbelts oriented perpendicular to the incoming wind speed, the more pronounced the wind speed attenuation behind the canopy, a longer distance would be required for airflow to recover to the incoming wind speed. In contrast, the wind protection effect of shelterbelts paralleled to the wind direction was extremely limited, making the U-shaped and rectangular networks more effective in wind protection than single shelterbelts and L-shaped networks. The findings would provide references for the structural configuration and optimal layout of shelterbelt systems.

For high-speed railways (HSR) in wind prone regions, wind barriers are often installed on bridges to ensure the running safety of trains. This paper analyzes the effect of wind barriers on the running safety of a high-speed train to cross winds when it passes on a bridge. Two simply-supported (S-S) PC bridges in China, one with 32 m box beams and the other with 16 m trough beams, are selected to perfonn the dynamic analyses. The bridges are modeled by 3-D finite elements and each vehicle in a train by a multi-rigid-body system connected with suspension springs and dashpots. The wind excitations on the train vehicles and the bridges are numerically simulated, using the static tri-component coefficients obtained from a wind tunnel test, taking into account the effects of wind barriers, train speed and the spatial correlation with wind forces on the deck. The whole histories of a train passing over the two bridges under strong cross winds are simulated and compared, considering variations of wind velocities, train speeds and without or with wind barriers. The threshold curves of wind velocity for train running safety on the two bridges are compared, from which the windbreak effect of the wind barrier are evaluated, based on which a beam structure with better performance is recommended. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To investigate the aerodynamic effect of wind barriers on a high-speed train-bridge system, a sectional model test was conducted in a closed-circuit-type wind tunnel. Several different cases, including with and without barriers, with different barrier heights and porosity rates, and with different train arrangements on the bridge were taken into consideration; in addition, the aerodynamic coefficients of the train-bridge system were measured. It is found that the side force and rolling moment coefficients of the vehicle are efficiently reduced by a single-side wind barrier, but for the bridge deck these values are increased. The height and porosity rate of the barrier are two important factors that influence the windbreak effect. Train arrangement on the bridge will considerably influence the aerodynamic properties of the train-bridge system. The side force and rolling moment coefficients of the vehicle at the windward side are larger than at the leeward side. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]