Back to Search Start Over

Description and evaluation of tropospheric chemistry and aerosols in the Community Earth System Model (CESM1.2).

Authors :
Tilmes, S.
Lamarque, J.-F.
Emmons, L. K.
Kinnison, D. E.
Ma, P.-L.
Liu, X.
Ghan, S.
Bardeen, C.
Arnold, S.
Deeter, M.
Vitt, F.
Ryerson, T.
Elkins, J. W.
Moore, F.
Spackman, R.
Source :
Geoscientific Model Development Discussions. 2014, Vol. 7 Issue 6, p8875-8940. 66p.
Publication Year :
2014

Abstract

The Community Atmosphere Model (CAM), version 5, is now coupled to extensive tropospheric and stratospheric chemistry, called CAM5-chem, and is available in addition to CAM4-chem in the Community Earth System Model (CESM) version 1.2. Both configurations are well suited as tools for atmospheric-chemistry modeling studies in the troposphere and lower stratosphere, whether with internally derived "free running" (FR) meteorology, or "specified dynamics" (SD). The main focus of this paper is to compare the performance of these configurations against observations from surface, aircraft, and satellite, as well as understand the origin of the identified differences. We partic ularly focus on comparing present-day methane lifetime estimates within the different model configurations, which range between 7.8 years in the SD configuration of CAM5- chem and 8.8 years in the FR configuration of CAM4-chem. We find that tropospheric surface area density is an important factor in controlling the burden of the hydroxyl radical (OH), which causes differences in tropical methane lifetime of about half a year between CAM4-chem and CAM5-chem. In addition, different distributions of nitrogen oxides (NOx) produced from lightning production explain about half of the difference between SD and FR model versions in both CAM4-chem and CAM5-chem. Remaining differences in the tropical OH burden are due to enhanced tropical ozone burden in SD configurations compared to the FR versions, which are not only caused by differences in chemical production or loss, but also by transport and mixing. For future studies, we recommend the use of CAM5-chem, due to improved aerosol description and inclusion of aerosol-cloud interactions. However, smaller tropospheric surface area density in the current version of CAM5-chem compared to CAM4-chem results in larger oxidizing capacity in the troposphere and therefore a shorter methane lifetime. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
19919611
Volume :
7
Issue :
6
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Geoscientific Model Development Discussions
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
100314116
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmdd-7-8875-2014