Back to Search Start Over

Dermatology Residency Selection Criteria with an Emphasis on Program Characteristics: A National Program Director Survey.

Authors :
Gorouhi, Farzam
Alikhan, Ali
Rezaei, Arash
Fazel, Nasim
Source :
Dermatology Research & Practice. 2014, p1-8. 8p.
Publication Year :
2014

Abstract

Background. Dermatology residency programs are relatively diverse in their resident selection process. The authors investigated the importance of 25 dermatology residency selection criteria focusing on differences in program directors' (PDs') perception based on specific program demographics. Methods. This cross-sectional nationwide observational survey utilized a 41-itemquestionnaire that was developed by literature search, brainstorming sessions, and online expert reviews. The data were analyzed utilizing the reliability test, two-step clustering, and K-means methods as well as other methods. The main purpose of this study was to investigate the differences in PDs' perception regarding the importance of the selection criteria based on program demographics. Results. Ninety-five out of 114 PDs (83.3%) responded to the survey. The top five criteria for dermatology residency selection were interview, letters of recommendation, United States Medical Licensing Examination Step I scores, medical school transcripts, and clinical rotations. The following criteria were preferentially ranked based on different program characteristics: "advanced degrees," "interest in academics," "reputation of undergraduate and medical school," "prior unsuccessful attempts to match," and "number of publications."Conclusions. Our survey provides up-to-date factual data on dermatology PDs' perception in this regard. Dermatology residency programs may find the reported data useful in further optimizing their residency selection process. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
16876105
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Dermatology Research & Practice
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
100483199
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/692760