Back to Search Start Over

Effect of re-irradiation for painful bone metastases on urinary markers of osteoclast activity (NCIC CTG SC.20U).

Authors :
Chow, Edward
DeAngelis, Carlo
Chen, Bingshu E.
Azad, Azar
Meyer, Ralph M.
Wilson, Carolyn
Kerba, Marc
Bezjak, Andrea
Wilson, Paula
Nabid, Abdenour
Greenland, Jonathan
Rees, Gareth
Vieth, Reinhold
Wong, Rebecca K.S.
Hoskin, Peter
Source :
Radiotherapy & Oncology. Apr2015, Vol. 115 Issue 1, p141-148. 8p.
Publication Year :
2015

Abstract

Purpose The NCIC CTG Symptom Control.20 randomized trial (SC.20) confirmed the effectiveness of re-irradiation to painful bone metastases. This companion study correlates urinary markers of osteoclast activity with response to re-irradiation, survival and skeletal related events (SREs). Methods Pain response was assessed using the International Consensus Endpoints. Urinary markers of bone turnover-pyridinoline (PYD), deoxypyridinoline (DPD), N-telopeptide (NTX), Alpha and Beta cross-laps of C-telopeptide (CTX)-before and 1 month after re-irradiation were correlated to response to re-irradiation and then to both, either or none of the initial and re-irradiation: frequent responders (response to both); eventual responders (response to re-irradiation only); eventual non-responders (response to initial radiation only), and absolute non-responders (no response to both). Results Significant differences between 40 responders and 69 non-responders to re-irradiation existed for PYD ( p = 0.03) and DPD ( p = 0.04) at baseline. When patients were categorized as frequent responders ( N = 34), eventual responders (6), eventual non-responders (59) and absolute non-responders (10), the mean values of all markers in the absolute non-responders at baseline and the follow-up were about double those for the other three groups with statistically significant difference for DPD ( p = 0.03) at baseline. Absolute non-responders had the worst survival. The few occurrences of the SREs did not allow meaningful comparisons among the groups. Conclusion There were significant differences between responders and non-responders to re-irradiation for PYD and DPD at baseline. The urinary markers in the absolute non-responders were markedly elevated at both baseline and follow-up with a statistically significant difference for DPD at baseline. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
01678140
Volume :
115
Issue :
1
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Radiotherapy & Oncology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
103087743
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2015.02.025