Back to Search
Start Over
The Meanings of Middle English Wight.
- Source :
-
Chaucer Review . 2015, Vol. 50 Issue 1/2, p178-197. 20p. - Publication Year :
- 2015
-
Abstract
- E. Talbot Donaldson's emendation of CT, III 117 to "And of so parfit wis a wrighte ywroughte," not adopted in the recent Variorum volume, rests on insufficiently established evidence. I demonstrate that Donaldson himself retracts crucial aspects of his argument; that Middle English usage shows both ambiguity and significant overlap between the word wight and divine beings (especially the second person of the Trinity); that Chaucer, who adheres to Donaldson's categorical distinction in Troilus, abandons it in the Canterbury Tales; and that various writers in the Christian tradition designate as the Creator (the point at issue in this line) Jesus the Christ: the second person of the Trinity whom it is unambiguously possible to call a wight. Donaldson's emendation remains possible, but the case for making it is much weaker than we have long supposed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Subjects :
- *CHRISTIANITY in literature
*JESUS Christ in literature
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 00092002
- Volume :
- 50
- Issue :
- 1/2
- Database :
- Academic Search Index
- Journal :
- Chaucer Review
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 103611545
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.5325/chaucerrev.50.1-2.0178