Back to Search Start Over

Patient-reported urinary incontinence following stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors :
Chen, Leonard N
Suy, Simeng
Wang, Hongkun
Bhagat, Aditi
Woo, Jennifer A
Moures, Rudy A
Kim, Joy S
Yung, Thomas M
Lei, Siyuan
Collins, Brian T
Kowalczyk, Keith
Dritschilo, Anatoly
Lynch, John H
Collins, Sean P
Source :
Radiation Oncology. 2014, Vol. 9 Issue 1, p148-148. 1p.
Publication Year :
2014

Abstract

<bold>Purpose: </bold>Urinary incontinence (UI) following prostate radiotherapy is a rare toxicity that adversely affects a patient's quality of life. This study sought to evaluate the incidence of UI following stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for prostate cancer.<bold>Methods: </bold>Between February, 2008 and October, 2010, 204 men with clinically localized prostate cancer were treated definitively with SBRT at Georgetown University Hospital. Patients were treated to 35-36.25 Gray (Gy) in 5 fractions delivered with the CyberKnife (Accuray). UI was assessed via the Expanded Prostate Index Composite (EPIC)-26.<bold>Results: </bold>Baseline UI was common with 4.4%, 1.0% and 3.4% of patients reporting leaking > 1 time per day, frequent dribbling and pad usage, respectively. Three year post treatment, 5.7%, 6.4% and 10.8% of patients reported UI based on leaking > 1 time per day, frequent dribbling and pad usage, respectively. Average EPIC UI summary scores showed an acute transient decline at one month post-SBRT then a second a gradual decline over the next three years. The proportion of men feeling that their UI was a moderate to big problem increased from 1% at baseline to 6.4% at three years post-SBRT.<bold>Conclusions: </bold>Prostate SBRT was well tolerated with UI rates comparable to conventionally fractionated radiotherapy and brachytherapy. More than 90% of men who were pad-free prior to treatment remained pad-free three years following treatment. Less than 10% of men felt post-treatment UI was a moderate to big problem at any time point following treatment. Longer term follow-up is needed to confirm late effects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1748717X
Volume :
9
Issue :
1
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Radiation Oncology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
103832885
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-9-148