Back to Search
Start Over
Detection of neck recurrence in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer: comparison of ultrasound, contrast-enhanced CT and (18)F-FDG PET/CT using surgical pathology as a reference standard: (ultrasound vs. CT vs. (18)F-FDG PET/CT in recurrent thyroid cancer).
- Source :
-
European Radiology . Oct2012, Vol. 22 Issue 10, p2246-2254. 9p. - Publication Year :
- 2012
-
Abstract
- <bold>Objectives: </bold>To compare the diagnostic performance of ultrasound, contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) and (18)F-FDG positron emission tomography (PET)/CT for detecting recurrent differentiated thyroid cancer in the neck.<bold>Methods: </bold>Twenty patients who had undergone previous surgery for differentiated thyroid cancer (19 papillary carcinomas; 1 medullary carcinoma) and presented with pathologically proven recurrence in the neck were included. All patients had undergone ultrasound, CT and PET/CT in the 2 months before further surgery. In each patient, ultrasound, CT and PET/CT images were retrospectively reviewed to determine the presence of loco-regional recurrence by level-by-level analysis. Imaging results were correlated with the histological evaluation of the neck dissection as a standard of reference.<bold>Results: </bold>Recurrences were found at 52 out of 110 cervical nodal levels surgically explored. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were 69.2 %, 89.7 % and 80.0 % for ultrasound; 63.5 %, 94.8 % and 80.0 % for CT; and 53.8 %, 79.3 % and 67.3 % for PET/CT, respectively. ROC analysis revealed higher diagnostic performance with ultrasound than with PET/CT for detecting recurrent tumour.<bold>Conclusions: </bold>Although no significant difference was found among the three techniques, the sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound and CT were higher than those of PET/CT for the evaluation of cervical recurrence in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer.<bold>Key Points: </bold>• Ultrasound, CT and ( 18 ) F-FDG PET/CT can all detect recurrent thyroid cancer. • Ultrasound and CT have higher sensitivity and specificity. • Ultrasound, CT and ( 18 ) F-FDG PET/CT frequently demonstrated discordant findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 09387994
- Volume :
- 22
- Issue :
- 10
- Database :
- Academic Search Index
- Journal :
- European Radiology
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 104364712
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-012-2470-x