Back to Search Start Over

The role of dual-time combined 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography in the staging and restaging workup of locally advanced rectal cancer, treated with preoperative chemoradiation therapy and radical surgery.

Authors :
Capirci C
Rubello D
Pasini F
Galeotti F
Bianchini E
Del Favero G
Panzavolta R
Crepaldi G
Rampin L
Facci E
Gava M
Banti E
Marano G
Capirci, Carlo
Rubello, Domenico
Pasini, Felice
Galeotti, Fabrizio
Bianchini, Enzo
Del Favero, Giuseppe
Panzavolta, Riccardo
Source :
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics. Aug2009, Vol. 74 Issue 5, p1461-1469. 9p.
Publication Year :
2009

Abstract

<bold>Purpose: </bold>In patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) staging and, after preoperative chemo-radiation therapy (CRT), restaging workup could be useful to tailor therapeutic approaches. Fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography ([(18)F]FDG-PET) is a promising tool for monitoring the effect of antitumor therapy. This study was aimed to evaluate the possible role of dual time sequential FDG-PET scans in the staging and restaging workup of LARC. <bold>Methods and Materials: </bold>Eighty-seven consecutive patients with LARC were enrolled. CRT consisted of external-beam intensified radiotherapy (concurrent boost), with concomitant chemotherapy PVI 5-FU (300 mg/m(2)/day) followed 8-10 weeks later by surgery. All patients underwent [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT before and 5-6 weeks later after the completion of CRT. Measurements of FDG uptake (SUV(max)), and percentage of SUV(max) difference (Response Index = RI) between pre- and post-CRT [(18)F]FDG-PET scans were evaluated. <bold>Results: </bold>Six of 87 patients were excluded due to protocol deviation. Following CRT, 40/81 patients (49%) were classified as responders according to Mandard's criteria (TRG1-2). The mean pre-CRT SUV(max) was significantly higher than post-CRT (15.8, vs 5.9; p < 0.001). The mean RI was significantly higher in responders than in nonresponder patients (71.3% vs 38%; p = 0.0038). Using a RI cut-off of 65% for defining response to therapy, the following parameters have been obtained: 84.5% sensitivity, 80% specificity, 81.4% positive predictive value, 84.2% negative predictive value, and 81% overall accuracy. <bold>Conclusion: </bold>These results suggest the potential role of [(18)F]FDG-PET in the restaging workup after preoperative CRT in LARC. RI seems the best predictor to identify CRT response. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
03603016
Volume :
74
Issue :
5
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
105385042
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.10.064