Back to Search Start Over

Cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures.

Authors :
Figved W
Opland V
Frihagen F
Jervidalo T
Madsen JE
Nordsletten L
Figved, Wender
Opland, Vidar
Frihagen, Frede
Jervidalo, Tore
Madsen, Jan Erik
Nordsletten, Lars
Source :
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research®. Sep2009, Vol. 467 Issue 9, p2426-2435. 10p.
Publication Year :
2009

Abstract

Hemiarthroplasty is the most commonly used treatment for displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly. There is limited evidence in the literature of improved functional outcome with cemented implants, although serious cement-related complications have been reported. We performed a randomized, controlled trial in patients 70 years and older comparing a cemented implant (112 hips) with an uncemented, hydroxyapatite-coated implant (108 hips), both with a bipolar head. The mean Harris hip score showed equivalence between the groups, with 70.9 in the cemented group and 72.1 in the uncemented group after 3 months (mean difference, 1.2) and 78.9 and 79.8 after 12 months (mean difference, 0.9). In the uncemented group, the mean duration of surgery was 12.4 minutes shorter and the mean intraoperative blood loss was 89 mL less. The Barthel Index and EQ-5D scores did not show any differences between the groups. The rates of complications and mortality were similar between groups. Both arthroplasties may be used with good results after displaced femoral neck fractures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
0009921X
Volume :
467
Issue :
9
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research®
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
105392563
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-008-0672-y