Back to Search Start Over

CT, MR, US,18F-FDG PET/CT, and their combined use for the assessment of cervical lymph node metastases in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

Authors :
Yoon DY
Hwang HS
Chang SK
Rho YS
Ahn HY
Kim JH
Lee IJ
Yoon, Dae Young
Hwang, Hee Sung
Chang, Suk Ki
Rho, Young-Soo
Ahn, Hwoe Young
Kim, Jin Hwan
Lee, In Jae
Source :
European Radiology. Mar2009, Vol. 19 Issue 3, p634-642. 9p.
Publication Year :
2009

Abstract

The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the diagnostic value of four different imaging methods-computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, ultrasonography (US), and (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/CT-and their combined use for preoperative detection of cervical nodal metastases in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Sixty-seven patients (58 men and 9 women; mean age, 60.1 years) with head and neck SCCs underwent CT, MR, US, and PET/CT before surgery. First, each study was reviewed separately for the presence of nodal metastases. Then, the value of combined images was assessed based on a confidence rating score for each modality assigned by observers. These results were verified, on a level-by-level basis, with histopathologic findings. Histopathologic examination revealed nodal metastases in 74 of 402 nodal levels. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 77.0%, 99.4%, and 95.3% for CT and MR; 78.4%, 98.5%, and 94.8% for US; and 81.1%, 98.2%, and 95.0% for PET/CT, respectively. The comparison of these modalities showed no statistically significant difference among them (p > 0.05). The combination of CT, MR, US, and PET/CT improved sensitivity (86.5%), without loss of specificity (99.4%) and accuracy (97.0%), although the difference failed to reach statistical significance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
09387994
Volume :
19
Issue :
3
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
European Radiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
105446264
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-008-1192-6