Back to Search Start Over

Expectant parents' preferences for mode of delivery and trade-offs of outcomes for breech presentation.

Authors :
Kok M
Gravendeel L
Opmeer BC
van der Post JA
Mol BW
Source :
Patient Education & Counseling. Aug2008, Vol. 72 Issue 2, p305-310. 6p.
Publication Year :
2008

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess patients' preferences and trade-offs for mode of delivery in case of breech presentation at term. METHODS: Eighty women (40 with a foetus in breech presentation and 40 with a foetus in cephalic presentation) with a gestational age from 36 weeks onwards were offered scenarios of vaginal and caesarean breech delivery in which 1-month and 2-year neonatal and maternal complication rates were varied; expectant fathers (when present) were interviewed separately. Thresholds for complication rates where patients switch preferences were visualised graphically in trade-off curves. Differences in preference thresholds were tested using the Wilcoxon signed ranks test. RESULTS: Caesarean delivery was the preferred mode of delivery for breech presentation in 65% of the patients interviewed. The trade-off questions showed that the 2-year neonatal outcome after breech delivery was the most important outcome for the mothers, whereas the fathers were more influenced by the maternal outcome. CONCLUSION: When realistic assumptions for complications are made, most women prefer a caesarean delivery over vaginal delivery for at term breech presentation. In the balance of pros and cons, 2-year neonatal outcome is the most important factor in the decision between caesarean and vaginal delivery. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: The results of this study can be used by the clinician to help patients weigh risk, benefit, and potential harm with regard to breech delivery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
07383991
Volume :
72
Issue :
2
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Patient Education & Counseling
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
105680896
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2008.04.008